S.K. Dunstall's Blog, page 22

In defense of ebooks as being … just like books

“The ebook is a stupid product. It is exactly the same as print, except it’s electronic. There is no creativity, no enhancement, no real digital experience.”

Arnaud Nourry, Hachette Group CEO (from ‘The ebook is a stupid product: no creativity no enhancement,’ says Hachette Group CEO‘ by Harsimran Gill)

 

 

 

Why does everyone persist in bagging the ebook?

It’s a book. and books took six hundred years to settle into what they are today.

Why do people insist on trying to turn the ebook into something it doesn’t need to be? Is there anything wrong with a book simply in a different format?

As a reader, all I want between me and my imagination is printed words. That’s what makes reading so much fun. I work out the rest. It’s my world, my interpretation of it.

I don’t need to be distracted from that by things that pull me out of the story.

I read ebooks more than I read paperback for two reasons. First, space. Space in my bag, space in my house. Second, portability. I can start reading on my PC at home, or my iPad, but while I’m waiting for the tram I’ll pull out my phone and read it on there, instead. (Space again, because I already carry a computer around in my bag.)

There’s also the added advantage that I get to save a few trees while I’m reading.

Enhanced ebooks. They’re called movies. They’re called computer games. They’re called choose your own adventures. And a whole lot of other things, too.

The book—paper or electronic—is the medium, not the message.

Oh, and by the way, the ebook is evolving, just not the way most people anticipated.

The evolved ebook?  It’s called an audiobook.

The internet is a writer’s research paradise

A white room, and how you would see it under infrared.

But first … a Goodreads giveaway.

The advanced reader copies (ARCs) for Stars Uncharted arrived at the editor’s office the other day. We haven’t seen them yet, but our editor says they look good.

Then, lo and behold, Sherylyn is searching Goodreads and what does she see? A giveaway. ARCs for Stars Uncharted. The Ace marketing department is on the ball. And they’re giving away lots of copies.

So, if you want to read an advanced copy of Stars Uncharted, head over to Goodreads and enter the giveaway. They’re giving away 30 copies, so the odds are good.

The giveaway ends on 1 March.  Go for it.

And second

Warning: Australian spelling. Colour is one of those words that can jar when you see it spelt with a u if you’re not used to it. The u is meant to be there. (Remember, grey is a colour, but gray is a color. :-))

 

The internet is a writer’s research paradise

Back in my early working days I worked on online shopping software for a hardware company. It was an old green-screen program, with a modem that plugged into the phone line.  (Showing my age here.)  I forget how the whole thing worked, all I know is that the buyer logged into the computer, dialled the hardware company’s computer, connected, and then laboriously loaded their order in.

Sometimes the phone line dropped out part-way through. When that happened, the poor buyer had to dial back in and start the whole process again.

Even I, working in the computer industry, wondered if online shopping would ever take off.

Look at us now, buying books and other things online with one click.

Online shopping is wonderful, of course, but there’s another part of the world wide web that is a writer’s paradise.

Research.

In the second Stars Uncharted book we have a character who can see into the infrared and ultra violet spectrums.

Where do we start even thinking about what he might see?

Once upon a time we’d have hit the libraries. Not just the local library, either, but some of the university libraries.  It would be a long and arduous process.

Now we hit the internet first.

Yes, there is a lot of incorrect information on the internet, but it’s a great starting point for research. People put some amazing stuff on there. Especially the science. And the architecture, and the pictures of places, and the … I could go on forever. There is so much good information, good images, good detail.

I mean, look at this amazing post, 10 Examples of How Animals See – Images That Show Us The World Through Their Eyes. By Morgans Lists*

This is exactly the sort of research we need for our book.

What did we get out of this?

If our guy can see fully through the visible spectrum and into ultra violet and infrared, how might he do it?  (He’s been modded. Modding is introduced in Stars Uncharted.)

Here’s what we got just from the Morgans List article above.

Birds are tetrachromats. Their four types of cone cells let them see red, green, blue and ultra violet together
Dogs only have two cones, blue and yellow but not red and green. Their vision can be compared to a human who is colour blind
Mantis shrimps use a set of filters to separate ultraviolet light into discrete colours that get picked up by the animal’s photoreceptors
Bees have colour receptors for blue and green but also for the UV spectrum

There is so much information here.

From here we look up rods and cones and photoreceptors, and the information expands.

 

Art, created specifically for photographing in ultra-violet light

How much research is enough?

Yes, even soft science fiction requires research.

It’s a rabbit hole, and it’s easy to fall into a research heaven and reader hell.Putting all that lovely research into your book, because it’s interesting, and because you know it now.

That’s why, nowadays, when writing the first draft of a book we stop at the internet research.

We make notes on what we think is important, but enough is enough.  Later on, once the book is closer to completion, we go over some of the science to be sure it’s as correct as we can make it. Talk to experts, if we can. Research more.

 

Science fiction still needs to make that leap from science to fiction

You can research as much as you like, but somewhere along the way, as a science fiction writer, you have to make the leap that takes you away from real science into the science fiction.

We did that with Stars Uncharted.

Elements high in the periodic table are unstable. They take massive equipment to generate, and they only last for a fraction of a second. But there’s a theory called the island of stability, where the protons and neutrons in the atoms balance (magic numbers) and remain stable, meaning that the element might remain stable too.

You won’t find the island of stability or magic numbers in Stars Uncharted (at least, I don’t think you will), but it was such a cool idea. We had to use it.

 

 

* Morgans Lists—it’s not clear if Morgans Lists the name of the site or the name of the author. Apologies if I’ve failed to credit the author. (And if you are the author, let me know, because it’s a beautiful list.)  The site is now on Google+.

 

 

Sorry, but you probably won’t be in our book

Back when we were writing Alliance there was a schoolgirl helping out at the hairdressing salon Sherylyn goes to.  She was in her fifth year at secondary school.  Her name was Pearl*.  Pearl was a lovely, talented, outgoing girl, and she wanted to be in our book.

“Name one of your characters after me.  Please.  I’ll take your book to school and show everyone my name is there.”

“We’ll see,” we said.  “But we’re not promising anything.”

Because for us, naming the character is one of the first things we settle on, and until we have that name, the character isn’t really a character, they’re just a nebulous nonentity. Some people say the character grows to suit their name.  For us, the name makes the character who he or she is.

We did think about renaming one of our characters for Pearl, but we knew she’d want to be a main character.  Or at least, a secondary character with some page time.

There was only one character she could possibly be.

Spacer Darelani Tinatin.

We couldn’t change Tinatin to Pearl.  It would have changed Tinatin’s character altogether.

Pearl Tinatin might have worked, because we only ever used Tinatin’s first name the once, but Pearl wanted something she could point to in the book to show, “Look, this is me.”  One mention didn’t cut it.

Pearl wouldn’t even have liked Tinatin.  She wanted to be the hero.

Pearl left the salon before we had to make a decision on the names.  Which was somewhat of a relief, actually.

It has taught us one thing.  Don’t say, “We’ll see,” to a question like that, because people take that to mean, “Yes.”

So if you ask us to put you into one of our books, you’ll understand why our answer will be a flat-out, “Sorry, but no.”

 

 

* It wasn’t really, it was another jewel name, but we’ve changed her name so we can write about her.

Write drunk, revise sober

Famous writers, including the below-mentioned Papa. But can you identify the others?

Hemingway supposedly once said, “Write drunk, revise sober.”

I say supposedly, because there is no real evidence that he said it, and certainly no evidence that he drank while writing.  In fact, another famous quote attributed to him is:

“Jeezus Christ! Have you ever heard of anyone who drank while he worked? You’re thinking of Faulkner…”

Hemingway drank. There’s no doubt about that, but I’m inclined to believe he did it after he’d finished writing for the day.

I mean, have you ever tried to write while drunk?

Write drunk

Let’s define drunk.

One glass of wine is not drunk.  Two glasses?  Not sober, but no, not really drunk either. Three glasses? Probably.

Let’s say you’ve shared a bottle of wine.  (A standard glass of wine is 100ml. A standard bottle, 750ml.)  You’re a little under the weather.

(We did this last night, which is what gave me the idea for this blog.)

“I’ll think I’ll finish that chapter I was writing earlier.”

You go in, open the document. Stare at it.  Write a couple of words. Stare at it some more.  Your head droops.  Droops a bit more.  Eyes cross.

“I can’t do this. I’m going to bed.”

Some people may be able to write drunk.  Neither of us can, we’re in our respective beds, snoring loudly.

Revise sober

That’s pretty much common sense really. You need a clear head to revise properly.

Interestingly, though, when we do the read-aloud, the almost-last revision of the book, we’d sit down with a glass of wine (one glass, not three) and make it a fun social event.  Especially back when Mum was alive and could read with us.

My judging criteria for shorter stories

The Locus Poll and Survey opened on 1 February.  This allows you to nominate best science fiction, fantasy, horror, YA and debut novels, among other things. The results are presented at the Locus Awards in June.

The categories are a lot like the Hugos and the Nebulas, except that instead of just a single best novel of speculative fiction, they divide the best novel prize into separate science fiction, fantasy, horror and young adult categories.

When I was younger the awards didn’t seem as prominent as they are now. I don’t know if that’s just my perception, but the internet seems to have made them more dominant that they used to be.

I like the way they showcase the best novels in each major sub-genre of speculative fiction.

It’s the one poll I vote in.  (Normally, anyway. This year, for the first time, I became a supporting member of WorldCon, which means I can also vote for the Hugos.)

So I had my list of novels I wanted to vote for. Skipped the ones, like horror, that I don’t read, and went down the list.

For novels, I vote for stories that have the trifecta. Great characters, interesting stories, excellent world-building.

When I got to the shorter stories, however, I have different criteria.

I only need one or two of these to consider a shorter story nomination-worthy.

The story that I marked as my number one novelette choice had a tired plot, and while the main character was good, no one else stood out. But the world-building, and the idea behind it. Oh, wow.

My judging criteria for short stories

The Locus Poll and Survey opened on 1 February.  This allows you to nominate best science fiction, fantasy, horror, YA and debut novels, among other things. The results are presented at the Locus Awards in June.

The categories are a lot like the Hugos and the Nebulas, except that instead of just a single best novel of speculative fiction, they divide the best novel prize into separate science fiction, fantasy, horror and young adult categories.

When I was younger the awards didn’t seem as prominent as they are now. I don’t know if that’s just my perception, but the internet seems to have made them more dominant that they used to be.

I like the way they showcase the best novels in each major sub-genre of speculative fiction.

It’s the one poll I vote in.  (Normally, anyway. This year, for the first time, I became a supporting member of WorldCon, which means I can also vote for the Hugos.)

So I had my list of novels I wanted to vote for. Skipped the ones, like horror, that I don’t read, and went down the list.

For novels, I vote for stories that have the trifecta. Great characters, interesting stories, excellent world-building.

When I got to the short stories, however, I have different criteria.

I only need one or two of these to consider a short story nomination-worthy.

The story that I marked as my number one choice had a tired plot, and while the main character was good, no one else stood out. But the world-building, and the idea behind it. Oh, wow.

How we learned to be more tolerant of continuity errors in books

Ghost horses, for reasons which will become clear in the post.

Recently, Sherylyn was reading a book, where halfway through, the protagonist’s horse dies.

That’s fine—well, not fine really, but these things happen in stories—except that, some chapters on, the protagonist is back riding that same horse, and continues to ride it for the rest of the novel.

Books with errors like these take you out of the story.  We’ve both been known to stop reading when errors like this happen.  This time, Sherylyn just shrugged, and kept reading.

“Sure,” she said.  “The horse is supposed to be dead, but it’s easy to make a mistake like that. And I’m enjoying the story.”

Since we got published, we’re a lot more forgiving of continuity errors in books.

We’ve made a few of our own.  One particularly egregious one in Linesman—or it might have been Alliance—that nearly slipped through was where Ean and company were attacked by a ship that had been destroyed many pages earlier. That got picked up by the copy editor.

Thank goodness for copy editors, is all I can say.

The thing is, when you’re editing, especially when you’re editing to a deadline, you can make mistakes.  Unless you’re a really organised writer (sad to say, not us yet) you’ve read the book so many times you just can’t, possibly, read the whole thing through once more. Or if you do read it through, you’re reading what you expect to see, not what’s really on the page.

There’s one place for errors to creep in.

A beta read will pick them up, or your own reread after you have put the book aside for a while. If you have the time.  But what if you’re making edits as a result of the beta read?

Another place for errors to creep in is in the edits you do after you send your finished story away, and your editor letter comes back, with notes and recommendations for changes.  We have this mad scramble to make the changes in the time given.  We don’t know about other writers, but we move chunks of the book around at this time. And we often add scenes. Like maybe, an extra fight.  Which is how we ended up with Ean being chased by a spaceship that had been destroyed earlier.

You’re doing this to a deadline, too.  While you try your hardest to fix every single issue that your changes have introduced, you’re always rushed, you’re on a deadline, and you’re too close to the work.

That’s why we’re so grateful for those second and third editing eyes at the publisher.

And why we’re more tolerant nowadays of continuity errors that once would have thrown us out of a story.  Especially on a writer’s earlier books.  We don’t like them, and work hard to avoid them, but they are so easy to miss.

A new year, a new look … and a newsletter

Site redesign

We’ve updated our website. The old site had been around a while, and didn’t scale super well on mobiles and tablets. So we’ve gone for a new look.

Over the next few weeks we’ll fine-tune it, but the basic design is there.

It has changed the way some images are presented.  We have gone back and updated the last few weeks’ posts, but we won’t do them all. As a result, you will see that a lot of the old blogs don’t appear to have images associated with them.  They do, but they’re not displayed until you actually view the post itself.

 

Newsletter

We have also introduced a newsletter.  If you want to receive a quarterly newsletter from us, why don’t you subscribe?

It’s hard to test newsletters.  Once you subscribe, that’s it. You can’t resend it to yourself, and short of signing up to multiple dummy emails (not something we want to do), we have to believe it’s okay.

If you do sign up, you should receive your first newsletter straight away. If you don’t get that newsletter, please let us know and we’ll see if we can find what the problem is.  This is new technology for us, and until we’ve used it a while we’re nervous about it.

 

Outside of that

We’re still working on the drafts of the book to be delivered after Stars Uncharted. We are both adding lots of words, and taking out just as much. Sherylyn’s really on a roll writing this week, which is good.

The story is starting to settle, and feel like a story we want to read/write.

The Last Jedi

This amazing kirigami (paper craft) spaceship created by Marc Hagan Guirey, from his latest book Star Wars Kirigami. Image from starwars.com

We saw The Last Jedi the other day.

Too many movies have given away the whole story in the trailers, so before we went, I tried very hard to avoid reading or seeing anything about The Last Jedi.

Over Christmas-new year break the internet was full of opinions about the latest Star Wars movie.  I tried to avoid them, but I could still see that there was controversy about the movie.  Some people liked it; some people appeared to hate it.

I was strong. I didn’t read any reviews or spoiler-nominated articles. I stuck to the entertainment news, like the red carpet, with Kelly Marie Tran becoming excited when she saw someone cosplaying her character.

The theatre was nearly full.  Not bad for the first session of the day for a movie that had been out three weeks.

The Last Jedi was wonderful.  I enjoyed it. And Rose, you are as great as the actress playing you. Can’t wait to see you in the next movie.

Cover art for Stars Uncharted

Having a book published takes time, but there are landmarks along the way.

Selling the book. That’s a given.

Signing the contract, which can often happen later than you expect it to.

Delivery and acceptance, which is when your editor finally says, “Yes, I’m happy with the edits you have made to this book.”

Copy edits, when you start to see what the finished book looks like.

The first time you see the cover.

Advanced reader copies, when you get physical books to hand out to people.

Publication.

The first time you see the cover

The first time you see your cover, however, isn’t necessarily the first time you can share it.  We first saw a cover for Stars Uncharted in early November.  It went through another iteration after that, and we saw the nearly-final one in early December.  Even then, you can’t show anyone until the publishing team sign it off.  So you end up sitting on this awesome cover, bursting to show someone, and you can’t.

So here we present, at long last, the cover for Stars Uncharted.

We think it’s awesome. Don’t you.