Adam Fenner's Blog, page 16

This is the sum of… – Review

Dave Williams

dust motes floating in the shaft of sunlight coming through a library’s tall windows
plus
the smell of coffee
plus
how that cloud resembles a palace
plus
tree leaves changing from a safe green to a fiery orange/red, like each stem is a lit match
plus
saying “effervescence” out loud
plus

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In This is the sum of…, the poet takes a series of small, everyday moments and weaves them together into a picture of a pleasant, quietly content day. The poem focuses on the ordinary—things like the smell of coffee, the sound of a baby giggling, or the feel of a crisp apple picked on an afternoon outing—but by gathering them together, the poet creates something larger, something richer than the sum of its parts. What’s striking about the poem is how these fleeting moments come together to form a complete experience, one that’s full of life, humor, and simple joy. The poem doesn’t try to capture grand or dramatic events, but instead celebrates the tiny details that often go unnoticed, showing that these small things are, in fact, what make life meaningful.

The poem’s structure reflects this idea of accumulation. The repeated use of “plus” creates a sense of addition, almost like a formula or mathematical equation. Each line adds a new detail to the picture, building on what came before, and the structure mimics the process of gathering sensory experiences throughout a day. It’s as if each “plus” represents a small, separate moment that, when put together, creates a larger whole. The poet plays with the idea of “addition,” not just in the structural sense, but also in the way each moment contributes to the overall feeling of the poem. The “plus” doesn’t just connect fragments; it suggests that every small moment has value, that each contributes to a greater richness. In this way, the poem feels like a series of equations, where the sum of these sensory experiences equals a beautiful, balanced whole.

The sensory moments in the poem—dust motes in sunlight, the smell of coffee, the sight of a cloud resembling a palace—are common experiences, yet they become extraordinary because the poet draws attention to them. These images could easily be overlooked, but when placed next to each other, they form a kind of rhythm, a flow that mimics the pulse of a day. The comparison of tree leaves changing from green to fiery red “like each stem is a lit match” adds energy to the poem, while the act of saying “effervescence” out loud introduces a playful moment, suggesting that even a word can create something alive and bubbling. In this sense, the poem captures how even the smallest details—things that seem insignificant on their own—are vital pieces in the puzzle of life.

At the same time, the poem doesn’t shy away from the imperfections of a day. The mention of Harold’s endless talk about fantasy football is a reminder that not every moment is perfect. Some are annoying, some are trivial, but they’re all part of the fabric of a real day. The poet doesn’t hide this fact but instead incorporates it into the experience, adding to the feeling of authenticity. In this way, the poem feels grounded in the everyday, capturing not just the moments of peace and beauty, but also the moments of irritation and mundanity. It’s this balance between the small joys and small annoyances that makes the poem feel true to life.

The tone of the poem is light and almost playful. The poet doesn’t take these moments too seriously but instead revels in their simplicity. The lightheartedness of the poem is underscored by the warm, quiet appreciation of everyday life. There’s no rush in the way the poet describes these moments. The description of a cat sleeping in a sunspot or the sound of rain tapping on a car roof is full of a kind of gentle mindfulness. The poet isn’t asking us to analyze or reflect too deeply; instead, the invitation is to notice and appreciate the small moments that make up a life. It’s a reminder to slow down and savor what’s around us.

In the end, This is the sum of… is a celebration of life’s simplicity. It shows how the small things—moments of sensory pleasure, fleeting thoughts, even the minor inconveniences—add up to create something full, something rich. The poem offers a picture of a day well-lived, not because of any one moment, but because of all the tiny things that contribute to the larger experience. There’s nothing dramatic here, but that’s the point. The beauty of the poem lies in how it reveals the quiet joys that make up a good day. It suggests that we don’t need grand events to feel alive—just a collection of small, simple moments that, when gathered together, form a life that’s full and complete.

On Mathematics and Poetry

To delve more into the details of how Mathematics and Poetry are interrelated, check out these three articles:

STEM Series: Discovering Math in Poetry – From Acorn Naturalists

How Poetry and Math Intersect – From the Smithsonian

The Patterns of Poetry: On the Mathematical and Poetic Value of Numbers – From Lit Hub

Photo by Piero Nigro on Unsplash

Things I Know, Believe, and Imagine – Review

Lauren Scott

I know hearts can shatter if beaten down,
and souls can be crushed if pounded,
and those judging others
appear to be close-minded.
I believe people should live
the life they were intended.

I believe differences afford knowledge.
Why is violence the chosen solution
for those who loathe a culture or religion?

I imagine everyone opening their
hearts and minds…
Can you envision this landscape,
like spring blooming every day,
budding across borders and state lines?
A glorious bridge connecting us all…
if only.

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In “Things I Know, Believe, and Imagine,” the speaker presents a raw exploration of the painful divide between violence and love, offering a blend of personal convictions, reflections on the state of the world, and hopeful imaginings for a better future. The poem starts by acknowledging the harsh realities of human suffering, particularly the emotional and physical toll of violence. The speaker knows firsthand how hearts can shatter and souls can be crushed, painting a stark picture of the damage caused by judgment, hate, and fear. This sense of disillusionment sets the stage for the speaker’s deeper reflections on what could be—a world grounded in empathy, understanding, and love.

The structure of the poem mirrors the speaker’s thought process, alternating between declarative statements of certainty (“I know” and “I believe”) and more speculative, hopeful musings (“I imagine”). This shift is significant because it allows the reader to see both the speaker’s grounded understanding of the world and their desire to move beyond the pain they see. The first part of the poem starts with what the speaker knows, followed by what they believe, which provides a glimmer of hope amidst the violence. For instance, the speaker believes that people should live the life they were intended to, free from hate and misunderstanding. This idea of living authentically is an invitation to reflect on the deeper, more compassionate life that could be if only humanity embraced empathy and acceptance.

As the poem progresses, the speaker imagines a world where differences are seen as sources of knowledge rather than division. They imagine hearts and minds opening, where love “blooms every day” across borders. This vision of hope is tempered with a clear recognition of reality—“if only.” The idealism of the speaker’s vision doesn’t erase the knowledge that the world is far from this hopeful state. Still, the speaker doesn’t give up on the possibility of change, continuing to imagine a world where love holds the center, despite the persistence of violence.

The tone of the poem is a mix of sorrow and hope, with an undercurrent of frustration. There’s no sugarcoating the damage that violence causes, yet there’s a steady belief that love can heal those wounds. Love is not depicted as a passive emotion but as an active force that requires effort and commitment. The speaker believes that love should be at the center of human life, and they position it as the solution to the violence and division we often see in the world. This is evident in their declaration that “Love should remain the center of all humankind.” It’s clear that love, in this context, is not just an ideal, but a force that can repair the damage caused by violence.

What sets the poem apart is its refusal to offer simple answers or resolutions. While the speaker imagines a better world, they don’t pretend it will be easy to achieve. Instead, they challenge the reader to confront the forces of hate and division that persist in society. This challenge comes in the form of the open-ended question, “What should we do differently?” This question is not a rhetorical one; it’s an invitation to action. The poem leaves readers with the responsibility to figure out how they can contribute to the vision of a world centered on love and understanding.

In the end, the poem doesn’t resolve the conflict between violence and love. It asks us to sit with that tension, to reflect on how we can close the gap between what we know—violence causes harm—and what we imagine could be—love can heal. The speaker imagines a world where love is the answer, but that world is not a given; it’s something we have to actively work toward. The poem is a call to action, urging us to take responsibility for the world we create, one small action at a time. It challenges us to turn our knowledge of violence into a commitment to love, to take steps, however small, to heal the brokenness around us.

Photo by Andrey K on Unsplash

They Never Knew – Review

Lesley Scoble

young men lie
where poppies grew;
they never knew
they would die that day,
in blood-stained mud
and where they lay
another dawn will rise;
and on this land
of final cries,
a new field of poppies,
…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In “They Never Knew,” the poppy becomes a central symbol, linking the bloodshed of war with the memory of those who died. The poem is a meditation on the tragic nature of war, focusing on how the sacrifices of soldiers are remembered long after their deaths. Through its imagery of poppies growing in the fields where young men die, the poem explores the idea that even though the soldiers did not understand the true cost of their sacrifice, their memory endures.

The poem opens with a simple yet powerful image: “young men lie / where poppies grew.” This line ties the soldiers’ deaths directly to the land, which becomes a grave marked by the symbol of the poppy. The poppy is a well-known symbol of remembrance, especially for those who died in war, and in this poem, it represents both the blood spilled on the battlefield and the ongoing act of remembering those who gave their lives. The repetition of “they never knew” reinforces the tragic inevitability of their deaths, suggesting that the young men had no way of understanding the lasting impact their deaths would have on the world.

As the poem progresses, the poppies take on a deeper significance. In the second stanza, the poet writes, “a new field of poppies, / red, / will grow.” The color red directly ties the flowers to the blood of the fallen soldiers, reinforcing the connection between the poppies and the violence of war. Even though the land will eventually heal, as indicated by the “strong trees” that will stand where “splintered woods decay,” the memory of the dead remains, symbolized by the poppies that continue to grow. The repetition of the poppy throughout the poem suggests that the cycle of war and remembrance is unbroken, with each new conflict bringing more bloodshed, but also more remembrance.

The poppies also represent a bridge between the past, present, and future. As the land transforms over time—“shell-blasted fields of requiem” eventually giving way to trees and healing—poppies continue to grow “with stains of blood.” Even as nature attempts to renew itself, the bloodshed of war lingers, and the poppies stand as a permanent reminder of the lives lost. The final line of the poem—“we will remember them”—pulls the responsibility of remembrance into the present. The poppies are not only markers of the past; they are a call to the living to honor those who sacrificed their lives, ensuring that the pain of war does not fade from memory.

The poem’s structure mirrors the passing of time, with short, fragmented stanzas that give each image room to breathe and resonate. The repetition of phrases like “they never knew” and “we will remember them” emphasizes the continuity of memory. The poppies, which grow from the blood of the fallen, become a way of linking generations. The soldiers may have died without understanding the weight of their sacrifice, but the poppies—and the memory of their sacrifice—will live on.

In the end, the poem doesn’t offer answers to the questions about the futility of war or the reasons behind it. Instead, it focuses on the enduring symbol of the poppy as a reminder of the bloodshed, the sacrifice, and the responsibility to remember. The poppies are a lasting mark of both mourning and remembrance, urging us to reflect on the past while acknowledging the ongoing legacy of those who died. Through this simple but powerful image, the poem reminds us that the blood of war is not easily forgotten, and it is our duty to carry that memory forward.

Author’s note: I have been so buried in work that I didn’t realize Veteran’s day was this week until halfway through the day. This would have been a better theme for Monday, but since I didn’t stumble onto Lesley’s poem until today, here we are.

Poppies for Remembrance

The red poppy is one of the most recognizable symbols of remembrance, particularly for those who died during World War I. Its association with wartime sacrifice began with the devastation of the Western Front and was later solidified through poetry, fundraising efforts, and public campaigns. Today, it serves as a lasting tribute to those who lost their lives in war, especially on Remembrance Day and Memorial Day.

The poppy’s journey as a symbol of remembrance begins in the fields of northern France and Belgium during World War I. The war, which took place from 1914 to 1918, ravaged the landscape of Europe, leaving behind torn-up fields and a soil stained with blood. Despite the destruction, a resilient red flower—Papaver rhoeas, the corn poppy—began to bloom in the battle-scarred land. This simple, bright flower, often found growing in disturbed soil, became a symbol of both the horror and the resilience of the war’s aftermath.

In 1915, Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae, a Canadian physician serving on the front lines, wrote the famous poem “In Flanders Fields” after witnessing the death of his close friend in the Second Battle of Ypres. The poem, which describes poppies growing among the graves of fallen soldiers, captured the image of the red flower as a poignant symbol of sacrifice and remembrance. The line “In Flanders fields the poppies blow, / Between the crosses, row on row” became etched in the collective memory of many, and the red poppy came to symbolize both the blood shed during the war and the memory of those who died.

McCrae’s poem inspired Moina Michael, an American professor, to adopt the poppy as a personal symbol of remembrance. In 1918, she wrote her own poem, “We Shall Keep the Faith,” and vowed to wear a red poppy every day to honor the soldiers who had died. Michael’s dedication led to the idea of using artificial poppies to raise money for veterans and their families. In 1920, the American Legion adopted the red poppy as its official symbol of remembrance, and the poppy began to be sold as a way to fund programs supporting veterans.

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, Frenchwoman Anna Guérin also recognized the power of the poppy as a symbol. She worked with the American Legion to promote the flower and organized efforts in France to sell artificial poppies as a means of raising funds for war orphans. Guérin’s campaign spread to the United Kingdom, where the Royal British Legion held its first “Poppy Appeal” in 1921. The appeal was a huge success, raising over £106,000, a significant sum at the time, for veterans’ welfare. The British Legion then established a factory in Richmond to manufacture the poppies, employing disabled veterans to make the artificial flowers. This tradition continues today, with millions of poppies being produced each year.

The poppy’s symbolism extends beyond World War I. It serves as a reminder of all those who have died in military service, and its use has spread worldwide. In the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, the poppy is worn on November 11, Remembrance Day (or Armistice Day), to honor those who died in the Great War and subsequent conflicts. In the United States, the poppy is worn on Memorial Day to remember those who sacrificed their lives in military service.

In addition to the traditional red poppy, other colors of poppies are now used to commemorate specific aspects of war. White poppies symbolize peace and a commitment to non-violence, while purple poppies honor the animals who lost their lives in conflict.

The poppy remains a powerful symbol of both sacrifice and remembrance. Its origins on the battlefields of World War I, where it flourished amidst the devastation, reflect the resilience of the human spirit and the enduring need to remember the cost of war. Through the ongoing efforts of organizations around the world, the poppy continues to serve as a tribute to those who gave their lives in the hope of a better future.

You may learn more from these sources:
Arlington.us – The Significance of Poppies for Remembrance
History Channel.com – The WWI Origins of the Poppy as a Remembrance Symbol
Imperial War Museum – Why We Wear Poppies On Remembrance Day

Photo by Henry Be on Unsplash

Forest Park for your Soul – Review

Milena Alien

in the rain things look clean
gloomy trees seem serene
love the smell, hugging fog
miles and miles of trails to walk
wildwood trail, take me up
where dreams get unstuck

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In “Forest Park for Your Soul,” rain is more than just a weather condition—it’s a transformative force. The poem begins by suggesting that rain makes everything feel “clean,” not just in the physical sense, but emotionally and spiritually. The rain clears away the heaviness of the world, giving the forest a fresh, almost mystical quality. As the rain falls, “gloomy trees seem serene,” turning what could be dark and oppressive into something peaceful. The trees, often symbols of endurance, become softer, gentler under the rain’s influence. The poem reflects how nature, through the simple act of rainfall, can reset the world around us, making it feel more tranquil and inviting.

This cleansing power of rain continues throughout the poem. It doesn’t just change how things look, but how they feel. The smell of the air, the fog “hugging” the trees, and the coolness of the ground all contribute to a heightened sense of mystery. The poem invites us to pay attention to these details, to notice how the rain brings out the hidden, elusive parts of the forest. The fog blurs the boundaries between what is clear and what is mysterious, and the rain makes everything feel more alive with secret histories.

The rain also plays a symbolic role in the speaker’s journey through the forest. The long trails of the park are more than just paths—they represent a deeper, reflective experience. As the speaker walks through this rain-soaked world, they’re not just moving physically, but also emotionally, perhaps letting go of what is “stuck” in their mind. The rain, in this sense, isn’t just part of nature’s backdrop; it’s an active participant in the experience, helping to clear the mind and make space for reflection.

The poem also introduces elements of mystery, particularly with the “witch’s castle,” a half-destroyed structure standing alone in the woods. The rain seems to make the castle even more enigmatic, adding layers of history and intrigue. No one knows how the castle came to be, and its partially ruined state suggests that time—and the rain—have erased part of its story. This abandoned castle stands as a symbol of the unknown, a reminder that there are mysteries in nature that we can sense but can never fully explain.

In the end, the poem doesn’t offer answers. It doesn’t try to explain the mysteries of the forest or the magic of the rain. Instead, it invites the reader to embrace the unknown and to appreciate nature’s beauty, especially in its fleeting, rain-soaked moments. The line “come again, see the magic while you can” serves as a gentle reminder that the magic of the forest, like the rain, is temporary—it’s a gift that we can only experience if we are present enough to notice it.

Overall, the poem celebrates the power of rain to transform the world around us. It cleanses, softens, and deepens our connection to nature, making the ordinary feel extraordinary. Through the rain, the speaker finds not just a physical landscape but a space for introspection and mystery, a place where the unknown is not something to fear, but something to be embraced. “Forest Park for Your Soul” shows that rain isn’t just a weather event; it’s a key to unlocking the deeper, hidden magic of the world around us.

Witches House

The Stone House, also known as the Witch’s Castle or Witches Castle, is a two-story structure located in Forest Park in Portland, Oregon. Originally commissioned by the Bureau of Parks in 1929, it was designed by architect Ernest F. Tucker as a public restroom, pavilion, and storage room. Construction was completed by the Works Progress Administration in 1935-1936. However, the building’s water line was destroyed during the 1962 Columbus Day Storm, and due to lack of funding for repairs, the structure was left in a state of disrepair.

Over the years, the Stone House has become a popular spot for graffiti, with local media describing it as a ruined, eerie structure. In 2015, it was noted for its “Tolkien-esque” appearance, though often marred by vandalism. By 2016, the graffiti was cleaned off, but the building remained a favorite destination for curious visitors and photographers. The structure has gained a reputation for its spooky ambiance, with some even associating it with occult activities. High school students, for example, have been known to gather there for parties, referring to the site as “Witches.”

In recent years, the Stone House has become a point of interest in Portland’s cultural landscape. It has been included in lists of the Pacific Northwest’s “coolest and creepiest abandoned places” and continues to attract hikers and tourists despite its condition. While some view it as a symbol of neglected public infrastructure, others embrace its haunting charm. In 2022, the building was featured in Portland Witch House, a book documenting countercultural rituals and outsider religion, cementing its status as a local icon with a mysterious and somewhat eerie reputation.

You may find this image here. 

Ophelia – Review

Barbara Leonhard

There is a willow grows aslant a brook…

~Shakespeare, Hamlet

When the old willow weeps,
her shoulders bend to the sun,
her ancient songs resound
in tune with us

Her light binds us to her limbs

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In the poem Ophelia, the poet uses the image of the willow tree to explore themes of grief, healing, and renewal. Drawing inspiration from the tragic Ophelia of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, who drowns after falling from a willow tree, the poet shifts the focus from death to the cycles of mourning and recovery. The willow, traditionally associated with sorrow, becomes a symbol of resilience and solace, suggesting that grief and healing are intertwined in the natural world.

The willow tree is central to the poem, and it is presented as both a figure of sorrow and strength. Early lines describe the willow as “weeping,” with its “shoulders bending to the sun,” and its “ancient songs” resonating in tune with us. These “songs” are not just noises, but rhythms that echo human grief, indicating that nature is not just a backdrop to human emotion but an active participant. The willow’s connection to human suffering is deep, as if it shares in our pain and offers comfort. This connection is reinforced when the poet says, “Her light binds us to her limbs,” suggesting that the tree serves as a spiritual bridge between the natural world and human experience, providing not only comfort but a sense of unity.

The poet’s decision to focus on the willow in the context of Ophelia’s death is significant. In Hamlet, Ophelia’s tragic end occurs when she falls from the very tree that this poem embraces. In that moment, the willow is a symbol of fragility, representing Ophelia’s vulnerability. However, the poem transforms this image. Rather than being a symbol of collapse, the willow becomes a symbol of endurance. The tree’s “strength to stand firm as we battle” and its “skirt” that “shelters the fallen” show that even in times of despair, nature can offer protection and comfort. The willow’s ability to stand tall despite the weight of sorrow reflects the resilience needed to navigate grief.

The poem also explores the idea of the willow’s tears. “In her tears, no regrets,” the poet writes. The willow’s tears are not signs of weakness but expressions of quiet mourning that need no apology. This highlights the natural world’s way of processing grief—subtle, ongoing, and part of a larger cycle of life. It suggests that, unlike humans who may be overwhelmed by emotion, nature mourns in its own quiet, steady way. The willow’s tears, then, symbolize a natural acceptance of sorrow, not as something to be fixed, but something to be felt and endured.

The poem’s structure supports these themes of endurance and healing. It is free-flowing, with no rigid rhyme or meter, much like the sway of a willow tree itself. The repetition of certain phrases, like “her” and “in her,” ties the poem together, creating a sense of interconnectedness between the willow, grief, and healing. The tone is reflective and gentle, inviting readers to take time with their sorrow and to find peace in nature’s steady rhythm. The poem does not rush through grief but instead acknowledges it as something gradual and quiet, like the growth of a tree or the passage of time.

The poet’s personal connection to the willow adds emotional depth to the poem. In their comments, the poet reflects on the recent loss of a family member and the hope that the poem’s recognition brings. This personal mourning aligns with the willow’s symbolism of endurance and rebirth, showing that even in the darkest times, there is potential for renewal. The willow not only symbolizes sorrow but also offers hope—its ability to recover from injury and regrow quickly speaks to the possibility of healing.

Ophelia uses the natural world to frame human emotion, offering a perspective on grief that is not just about loss but about resilience, renewal, and finding solace in the steady rhythms of life. Through the willow, the poet invites us to understand that, like nature, we too have the capacity to endure, to mourn, and eventually to heal. The willow stands as a quiet reminder that even in our sorrow, we are held by something larger than ourselves.

Photo by Hendrik Will on Unsplash

I’ll Be There – Review

Mia Winhertt

I am not white.
I am not black.
I am certainly grey.
But when you need me,
I’ll be there.

I can be selfish.
I can be unreasonable.
I can be stubborn.
But when you start falling,
I’ll be there.

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

“I’ll Be There” explores the messy, contradictory nature of love and relationships. The poem doesn’t offer an idealized or perfect vision of love but instead focuses on the complex, often imperfect commitment that defines deep, real connections. From the start, the speaker introduces a sense of duality, stating they are “not white” or “not black” but “certainly grey.” This line sets the tone for the poem’s exploration of life’s gray areas, suggesting that relationships, like people, are rarely simple or easily categorized. The grayness symbolizes the complexity of human connections—where contradictions exist side by side and where love is both imperfect and unwavering.

Throughout the poem, the speaker openly acknowledges their flaws. They describe themselves as “selfish,” “unreasonable,” and “stubborn,” qualities that might make relationships difficult. Yet, despite these imperfections, they promise, “I’ll be there” when needed. This repetition of the phrase throughout the poem serves to underline the main theme: love is not about being perfect but about being present. Even when the speaker is frustrating or hard to love, their commitment remains constant. The poem suggests that real love isn’t about always getting it right or solving problems; sometimes, it’s about simply showing up.

The speaker’s contradictions—the selfishness alongside the devotion, the stubbornness alongside the promise of support—mirror the dualities present in many relationships. Love can be both challenging and dependable. It’s not always easy, but it’s still there when it matters most. The repetition of “I’ll be there” becomes a form of quiet strength. It reflects the kind of love that endures, even when things aren’t perfect or when both people involved are difficult in their own ways. It’s a reassurance that, no matter the ups and downs, love will persist, even in the most difficult moments.

The poem also touches on the idea that love doesn’t need constant validation. “You don’t have to ask me / You don’t have to doubt it” implies that true love doesn’t require constant reaffirmation. Even when the speaker acknowledges their flaws and admits to driving others crazy, the commitment to being there remains unchanged. It’s a love that endures despite the imperfections, a reminder that the most enduring relationships are built not on perfection but on presence.

In the final lines, the speaker says, “Because that’s who I am / Because that’s how I live / Because that’s how I love,” embracing their flaws as part of who they are. This acceptance of imperfection ties back to the central theme of duality—love is not without its struggles, but it’s constant and reliable nonetheless. The speaker’s flaws don’t make their love any less genuine; in fact, they highlight the authenticity of it. It’s love that doesn’t shy away from the messy parts of life but continues to show up, even when things aren’t ideal.

“I’ll Be There” is a powerful reflection on the complexity of relationships. It recognizes that love, in its truest form, isn’t about being flawless but about being present. The speaker’s imperfections don’t diminish their commitment—they highlight the reality that love is messy, sometimes difficult, but always enduring. The poem reminds us that relationships aren’t defined by perfection, but by the steady presence of love, even when things aren’t easy.

Photo by PHUOC LE on Unsplash

Drilling, Drilling, Drilling – Review

Ingrid

We will be drilling, drilling, drilling 
while you’re filling, filling, filling
your gas-guzzling juggernauts with discount fuel.

We will be grinning, grinning, grinning 
while we’re winning, winning, winning 
and we feel we are, god-like, ordained to rule.

We’ll keep on drilling, drilling, drilling 
while you’re drowning, drowning, drowning 
in your cars, swept away by the flash-floods.

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

“Drilling, Drilling, Drilling” is a blunt critique of the climate crisis and how humanity keeps making the same mistakes in the face of mounting environmental damage. The poem highlights the repetitive and destructive actions that drive the climate crisis, showing how the system refuses to change even as the consequences grow worse. The repetition in the poem mirrors the unending cycle of exploitation and denial that characterizes our approach to the environment.

The poem’s central theme is about humanity’s failure to learn from its environmental mistakes. The repeated use of “drilling” symbolizes the relentless extraction of oil and the ongoing cycle of consumption and degradation that fuels the climate crisis. “Filling,” the act of fueling vehicles, contrasts with this, suggesting that ordinary people are also part of the problem, continuing to support a system that harms the planet. No matter how severe the consequences get, the same actions continue. This constant, mindless repetition highlights how stuck we are in a cycle of destruction.

The poem also sharply critiques the people who benefit from this system—the powerful few who profit from fossil fuels while the rest of the world suffers. The “grinning” and “winning” of those in control are described in a grotesque way, showing how indifferent and entitled they feel. The line “god-like, ordained to rule” hints at the dangerous mindset that some in power have, believing they have a divine right to exploit the planet without facing consequences. This sense of entitlement, combined with greed, is a key part of the poem’s message. Those benefiting from the destruction continue to ignore or downplay the suffering they cause.

At the same time, the poem shows how those who are most affected by climate change—the ones “drowning” in floods or “floating” down landslides—are trapped in the cycle with no control. Even when the reality of climate destruction becomes impossible to ignore, people still react in ways that don’t address the root causes. The line “So keep on voting, voting, voting” captures the sense that political solutions, like voting, are futile if the system itself doesn’t change. People protest, they react, but nothing really shifts. The system continues to run as it always has.

The imagery of “fiddling, fiddling, fiddling” while the world burns emphasizes the indifference of those in power. Instead of taking meaningful action to address the crisis, the powerful are portrayed as distracted or detached from the reality of the destruction they’re causing. The “prayers” for “the goods” are a false hope, reflecting how some people still believe that things will work out without having to make real changes. This apathy is a major theme of the poem, showing how those in power cling to failed systems, hoping for an easy fix while the planet continues to burn.

What’s striking about the poem is how it captures the sense of repetition, both in the structure and in the real-life actions it describes. The constant cycling of words like “drilling” and “filling” mirrors the way we keep repeating the same mistakes. The final line, “gold: some instinct animal’s inside,” sums up the message: humanity’s greed is not just a rational choice but an instinct, a deep, primal force that overpowers our concern for long-term survival.

In the end, “Drilling, Drilling, Drilling” is a bleak reflection of humanity’s failure to break out of its destructive patterns. It shows how the people who benefit from the exploitation of the environment remain indifferent, while those who suffer can do little to change the system. The repetitive structure and dark tone emphasize how stuck we are, and how the cycle of destruction will continue unless we make a fundamental change. Whether we can break free from this pattern in time is uncertain, but the poem makes it clear that without a shift in behavior, the destruction will only get worse.

Photo by Clyde Thomas on Unsplash

Oh, bother- brothers – Review

 Sadje

Three brothers gifted while all I wanted was a sister 
The older one a tyrant, though only senior by measly two years 
The one closest to my age was just younger by fifteen months 
We were mostly on the best of terms, supporting each other in times of need 
Unless we were fighting like cats and dogs, tearing out each other’s hair 
The youngest was the baby of the family, more like my own child than a sibling 
…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes 

Analysis

In “Oh, Bother- Brothers”, the speaker takes us through the evolution of sibling relationships, from the chaos and closeness of childhood to the emotional distance that often comes with aging. The poem is an honest reflection on how family bonds change over time—what starts as intense, sometimes combative, relationships evolve into more distant and formal ones. It’s a story of growing up, growing apart, and accepting that relationships are not always as intimate as they once were.

The poem begins with a feeling of dissatisfaction. The speaker starts by saying, “Three brothers gifted while all I wanted was a sister,” which sets up an immediate sense of longing. The speaker’s desire for a sister suggests a wish for a different kind of relationship, one that might have been less competitive or combative. Instead, the speaker had brothers, each with their own personality and role in the family dynamic. The older brother, called a “tyrant,” looms large despite only being two years older, showing how the oldest sibling often plays a dominant role in family life. Then there’s the sibling closest in age, with whom the speaker alternates between support and intense conflict—“fighting like cats and dogs, tearing out each other’s hair.” The dynamic between them is full of highs and lows, full of love and rivalry. Finally, the youngest is described as more of a child than a sibling, evoking the protective role the speaker might have taken toward him.

As the poem moves forward, there’s a shift in tone. The speaker reflects on the present: “Now we all are grown up, gray-haired, above fifty all of us.” This line marks a clear transition from childhood to adulthood, where the emotional intensity of those earlier years seems to have faded. The fights and moments of closeness that once defined the sibling relationships are now forgotten. Instead, what remains is a more formal connection—“strained by the distance between us.” The use of the word “formal” suggests that the siblings now interact more out of obligation than emotional connection. What was once spontaneous and deeply felt has become routine.

In the later lines, the speaker mentions the saying, “Blood is thicker than water,” which is often used to remind people of the strength of family ties. But here, it feels more like a reminder to check in on each other, even if those connections feel shallow or detached. The phrase “No news is good news!” further illustrates this emotional distance, as the speaker suggests that sometimes, not hearing from a sibling might be the easiest way to keep things calm. These lines capture the bittersweet reality that while family may remain important, the deep emotional bonds of childhood have faded into something more distant.

The structure of the poem, with its free verse form and varying line lengths, mirrors the unpredictable nature of sibling relationships. There’s no rigid pattern, just as there’s no predictable way relationships will evolve over time. The tone moves from frustration and longing in childhood to nostalgia and resignation in adulthood, reflecting the emotional journey the speaker has gone through with their brothers.

Overall, “Oh, Bother- Brothers” is a candid exploration of how sibling relationships can evolve over time. It speaks to the universal experience of growing up, where the intensity of childhood relationships often gives way to the more distant, formal connections of adulthood. The poem doesn’t shy away from the reality that family bonds can weaken with time, but it also acknowledges that those bonds, even if changed, are still there in some form.

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Shadows

Avinight

Shadows I can see,
of things that are gonna be,
Shadows left behind,
because they aren't needed, right?

Reflections they show, 
Of Future,

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

Analysis

In the poem “Shadows,” the speaker challenges the common view that shadows are dark and negative, encouraging readers to see them instead as evidence of light. The central idea of the poem is that shadows are not to be feared or avoided, but rather, they are the natural result of light. The speaker asks us to reconsider our assumptions about shadows and understand them as part of a greater balance between light and darkness.

At the core of the poem is the relationship between light and darkness. Shadows, often viewed as dark or even sinister, are shown to be proof of light’s presence. The speaker writes, “They are considered dark, / even though, / they prove, / the presence of light.” This challenges the traditional view of shadows as something negative. Instead, the poem suggests that shadows exist because light is shining on an object, and thus, shadows should be seen as signs that light is at work, not as symbols of evil or absence.

“Shadows” touches on the impermanence of…shadows. The speaker mentions that shadows represent things that are “gonna be” or “left behind,” highlighting their temporary and shifting nature. Just like moments in life, shadows change constantly, reflecting the past, present, or future. This idea deepens the theme of shadows being more than just dark shapes; they are fluid, always in motion, and always tied to the presence of light.

The poem’s structure mirrors the theme of shifting shadows. It follows a free verse form, with no set rhyme or rhythm. This lack of structure reflects how shadows change shape and appearance based on the light around them. The short, fragmented lines create a sense of movement, echoing how shadows are not fixed but fluid, adapting to the light source. The simplicity of the language makes the poem feel reflective and accessible, inviting readers to think about shadows in a deeper way without distraction.

The straightforward language also helps convey the poem’s main message clearly. The speaker doesn’t use overly complicated metaphors, but instead keeps the focus on the idea that shadows are a natural part of life, created by the light. This direct approach helps readers engage with the poem’s ideas and understand that shadows should not be feared, but recognized as evidence that light is present.

This piece also reflects the author’s personal experience of being misjudged. The speaker compares the misunderstanding of shadows to how people are often judged based on surface-level impressions. Just as shadows are wrongly seen as dark or negative, introverted or quiet people can be misjudged as unfriendly or rude. The poem encourages readers to question their biases and reconsider how they perceive both shadows and people. The speaker asks, “Who said shadows are bad?” to challenge us to think about why we view certain things in a particular way.

The tone of the poem is calm and reflective. The speaker is not trying to make an aggressive argument but rather gently invites the reader to reconsider their views. The poem’s message is one of acceptance and understanding, suggesting that shadows, like people, have value and purpose. Shadows are not negative; they are a result of light, and we should appreciate them as part of the natural balance in the world. The poem encourages us to embrace the presence of shadows as proof that light exists and is shaping the world around us.

“Shadows” is a thoughtful poem that uses the image of shadows to explore the balance between light and darkness. Through its simple structure and language, the poem challenges readers to reconsider their assumptions about shadows and to see them not as dark or negative, but as proof of the presence of light. The poem encourages us to look beyond surface appearances and recognize the deeper connections between light, darkness, and the world around us. Ultimately, it reminds us that shadows are not to be feared but celebrated as part of the larger flow of light in our lives.

Photo by David Werbrouck on Unsplash

Water, Beautiful Water

Chris Hall

shall we go?
we have wooden boats
five of us

we will row
gently but swiftly
here we go;

…

You may find the rest of the poem here.

Analysis

In “Water, Beautiful Water,” the speaker creates a peaceful scene in nature, where clear water, tall mountains, and deep air come together to form a calm and beautiful moment. The poem’s imagery captures the simple beauty of nature, but it also reminds us that such moments are brief. This mix of peace and the awareness of time passing gives the poem a bittersweet tone.

The poem starts with a simple yet powerful image: five people in wooden boats, gently rowing across clear water. The wooden boats suggest a humble connection to nature, while the clarity of the water reflects the beauty of the surroundings. The image of the mountains “staring up” brings the landscape to life, making the mountains seem like quiet, watchful companions to the rowers. This anthropomorphism suggests that the mountains are timeless, always present, and unmoved by the passing of time, which contrasts with the rowers’ awareness that their moment on the water is limited.

The line “air breathes deep” connects the rowers with the natural world around them. The breath of the air gives a sense of life and vitality, adding to the feeling of harmony in the scene. The repeated word “row” mimics the calm, steady motion of rowing, reinforcing the peaceful atmosphere. The use of words like “lovely” and “wonderful” shows the speaker’s deep appreciation for the beauty of the moment.

However, despite the calm beauty of the scene, the speaker soon acknowledges that time is running out. The final line, “such a shame we only have an hour,” shifts the tone from peaceful enjoyment to quiet regret. This line reminds us that even the most beautiful moments in nature are temporary. The word “shame” highlights the sadness the speaker feels about how quickly time passes. The briefness of the hour becomes a symbol for how time often feels too short when we are fully immersed in a beautiful moment.

The poem’s simple structure and steady rhythm reflect the gentle motion of the boats, while the repetition of “row” adds to the feeling of time moving forward. The tone of the poem starts with contentment but shifts to a sense of loss, reminding us that peaceful moments don’t last forever. Overall, “Water, Beautiful Water” captures the fleeting nature of time, encouraging us to appreciate the present while recognizing that it will soon slip away.

Photo by Mukul Joshi on Unsplash