Marguerite Bennett's Blog, page 292

June 27, 2016

Photo



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 27, 2016 00:00

June 26, 2016

buzzfeed:

There’s a Chrome extension that replaces...









buzzfeed:



There’s a Chrome extension that replaces “Millennials” with “Snake People” and it’s pretty great. [x]


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 18:00

medievalpoc:

medievalpoc:


While Murray assumes considerable...



medievalpoc:



medievalpoc:




While Murray assumes considerable real estate in the foreground of the painting, there is great care in the representation of Belle. She is not darkened nor obscured, her gaze is fixed and direct; she is smiling and is dressed as an aristocrat. The portrait is exceptional for these reasons.


Other images of the period present a black identity negatively and these images exist in great abundance. And what we learn from looking back at these images is telling: the white European perception of our bodies, our beauty rendered in such monstrous ways to the edification of whiteness is the tool of white supremacy.


We are very much still negotiating the impact of seeing images that erase and obscure black beauty and humanity today.


Our blended histories have yet to be accurately represented in popular consciousness, so every old story uncovered becomes a new retelling and a demand that we examine some painful truths about our past and how it shapes our present.



-Syreeta McFadden, “Belle Navigates Blurred Lines Between Race, Gender, and Class in 18th Century Britain” (feministing.com)


Medievalpoc posts tagged “Dido Elizabeth Belle



Someone recently asked me about the first thing I saw or read that seeded the idea for medievalpoc. 


This portrait of Dido Elizabeth Belle was included in a presentation for Honors Interdisciplinary History of Western Civ (part 2 i think), a nine-credit course in a program I was in back in college, years ago. And even being a part of something that intensive (the full program had 24 req’d credits of JUST interdisciplinary history), I’m pretty sure this was the only painting of its kind I saw.


Making these images more accessible to educators and students (in or outside of institutions!) is one of the main goals of this project, because I know from experience that sometimes art can inspire us in ways we never expected or imagined.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 15:01

superdames:

“Lucy and Sophie Say Goodbye” is a newspaper strip...





superdames:



“Lucy and Sophie Say Goodbye” is a newspaper strip from the early 1900s (circa 1905 here) about two women who just can’t bear to part from one another.


In each strip, Lucy and Sophie are completely oblivious to the hazards and chaos around them, while the women say long goodbyes and kiss on the mouth. 


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 12:01

rachelbearenson:

carol danvers + the motto









rachelbearenson:



carol danvers + the motto


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 09:01

Photo



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 06:00

sparklingcleanlies:

attackfishscales:

agnellina:

tikkunolamorgtfo:

agnellina:

tikkunolamorgtfo:
...

sparklingcleanlies:



attackfishscales:



agnellina:



tikkunolamorgtfo:



agnellina:



tikkunolamorgtfo:



kuklarusskaya:



teasyntara:



princessxbilbo:



collababortion:



partycockroach:



holytaxidermybatman:



“they couldn’t make the Maximoffs Jewish because they can’t make any reference to Magneto”


did u kno…. magneto is not the only jewish person in the world……



this is bullshit all my jewish friends are related to magneto



It’s true I am



Me too



also me



ok so
I’ve been holding back but I need to tell you
I too am related to magneto because I am jewish so



I feel like I need to step in here and clarify that not every Jewish person is related to Magneto.


Basically, all Jews can be divided into four groups based on tribal ancestry: Cohenim, Levites, Israelites, and Magnetoim. Halachically, only Jews who are descended from Magneto through the paternal line are Magnetoim, although you can become a Magnetoim through marriage. For example, my mother’s family are Levites, but because my paternal grandfather wasn’t Jewish, I was, for most of my life, an Israelite. However, my husband is a Magnetoim, so now I am, as well. When we have children, they will also be Magnetoim.


I hope that explains everything!



Also, if you are a non-genetically Jewish adoptee adopted by Jewish parents OR a genetically Jewish adoptee adopted by non-Jewish parents you’re automatically a Magnetoim. It’s a little known Halachic quirk.



Yeah, the Halacha on this is really wonky, because while adoptees automatically fall under the umbrella of Magnetoim, Gerim are usually designated as Israelites, unless they possess the ability to bend metal at will, in which case, they are halachically Magnetoim by default.



Yup! I remember hearing a d'var Torah on this a few years back. It’s really interesting! 



So, uh, what about ethnic Jewish people who can trace their metalbending back to a Bei Fong on the gentile side of their family?



I think it depends on which side you’re inheriting your ability to control metal from. Jewishness is derived from the mother, while lineage is derived from the father. So it depends on a) if the Bei Fong converted, b) if they were male or female and c) if that side of your family it maternal or paternal.


A ger Bei Fong father on the paternal side would mean that you’re inheriting Magnetoim lineage (see above, re: gerim with the ability to control metal). On the other hand the Halacha is a little confused if the metal-control is not inherited from a Jewish parent, because a non-Jewish father usually makes you Israelite by default.


It IS possible to be an Israelite with metal control abilities– although, IIRC, many such modern Jews of liberal bent feel free to identify as Magnetoim out of solidarity. Some conservative Jews frown on that practice because it confuses lineage and might complicate the situation if we ever end up with a new Holy Temple.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 03:00

potbelliedgeek:

So my mom is shopping in a supermarket, wearing a full hijab and jilbab (commonly...

potbelliedgeek:



So my mom is shopping in a supermarket, wearing a full hijab and jilbab (commonly misnamed as a burka) and the whole time she is there, this kid is staring at her. Won’t stop staring. Just looking with wide-eyed shock. The lil feller isn’t any older than four. She doesn’t think much of it, she is used to far worse than just a few stares. Until the very end when the kid and his mom are behind her in the checkout, and he leans up and whispers loudly: “I LOVE YOU BATMAN”


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 26, 2016 00:00

June 25, 2016

weights-cardio-repeat:

aboundofcolor:

onefitmama:

isyourcomput...



weights-cardio-repeat:



aboundofcolor:



onefitmama:



isyourcomputeratorrunning:



onefitmama 



Goals!



fucking epic



Lmao the way he sits back down




aw bless them i hope they become friends

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 25, 2016 18:00

"Fashion is one of the very few forms of expression in which women have more freedom than men. And I..."

“Fashion is one of the very few forms of expression in which women have more freedom than men. And I don’t think it’s an accident that it’s typically seen as shallow, trivial, and vain. It is the height of irony that women are valued for our looks, encouraged to make ourselves beautiful and ornamental… and are then derided as shallow and vain for doing so. And it’s a subtle but definite form of sexism to take one of the few forms of expression where women have more freedom, and treat it as a form of expression that’s inherently superficial and trivial. Like it or not, fashion and style are primarily a women’s art form. And I think it gets treated as trivial because women get treated as trivial.”

-

Fashion is a Feminist Issue: Greta Christina

  (via

vogueltalia

)

I feel like this about lingerie and specifically the value people place on lingerie (which is very often women’s work). The devaluation of things associated with women and women’s labor is reified in garments that are almost exclusively seen on women’s bodies. There’s this overwhelming sense that the labor associated with sewing, say, a bra is valueless, and that the laborer should be willing to work for free…or at least for inhumanely cheap wages. Culturally, I think this devaluation also ties into a lot of other things (for example, in America, puritanical Protestantism and its suspicions of the body, and, globally, the taken-for-granted exploitation of people of color), but I’ve just been idly pondering the way lingerie links up with many other conversations. And that’s not even getting into all the other expectations surrounding lingerie and how women are penalized for not conforming. Lift your breasts, but don’t wear push-ups. Wear underwear, but make sure it’s invisible. And so forth and so on. (I’m on my phone, by the way. Please pardon any typos.)

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 25, 2016 15:01

Marguerite Bennett's Blog

Marguerite Bennett
Marguerite Bennett isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Marguerite Bennett's blog with rss.