Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 7

November 16, 2017

YouTube Censors Mark Collett

As if Twitter’s purge of Alt Right and even tame Alt Lte accounts wasn’t bad enough, Mark Collett’s recent YouTube/Podcast video pertaining to the United Kingdom’s recent propaganda of pushing anti-white sentiments into the holiday spirit was pulled from YouTube in a matter of hours.


Given that the authoritarians don’t want you to see it, go give it a watch, a retweet, and share it where ever possibly.


The banned video can be found here: https://www.minds.com/MarkCollett


and his comments on the matter are below:



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 16, 2017 11:45

November 14, 2017

Alt Right 101 | The LGBT Agenda | #4

Video Version:



 


Audio Version can be found on Spreaker.


Backup Audio:



https://brefaucheux.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/alt-right-101-lgbt-4-mp3.mp3


In This Episode We Discuss:



1:42 An introduction to the topic
3:50 How LGBT rights is presented by the left vs how they behave
9:25 How the LGBT community is used as a weapon
12:29 Science suppressed by the pink mafia
16:18 Sexualization of pre-pubescent children
26:30 The slippery slope of normalizing the unthinkable
30:44 The pedophilia/molestation connection
37:25 The attack on the traditional family unit
46:32 The trickle effects of the LGBT agenda
52:23 Red Cross case study

Mark Collett Links:


Mark’s Book: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

Mark’s Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/user/mark318i


Bre Faucheux Links:


Website: http://brefaucheux.com/

Podcast: http://27crowsradio.com/

Support my work: https://www.paypal.me/BreFaucheux


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 14, 2017 07:03

November 9, 2017

Germany acknowledges third gender?

Every time I think we’ve reached peak degeneracy, the world surprises me.


Germany’s top court has called on the country’s parliament to legally recognize a ‘third gender’ which allows intersex people to identify as neither male nor female. Germany could become the first European country to allow a third gender on birth certificates.


The current law on civil status discriminates against intersex people as it rules out “the registration of a gender other than ‘male’ or ‘female,’” the Federal Constitutional Court said in a ruling on Wednesday. The German parliament should introduce new provisions into current legislation by December 31, 2018, it said.


‘X’ gender: Germans no longer have to classify their kids as male or female

The court made its ruling in favor of an appeal brought earlier this year by an intersex person whose name hasn’t been revealed in the German media. The person was registered as female but chromosome analysis showed that the plaintiff was neither male nor female. The person brought the appeal to the top court after several lower courts had ruled against the bid for gender change in the birth register.


“Even if this person chose the option ‘no entry’ [for gender], it would not reflect that the complainant does not see themself as a genderless person, but rather perceives themself as having a gender beyond male or female (sic),” according to the ruling. Civil status is not “a marginal issue,” but rather a “position of a person within the legal system, as stated by the law,” the statement said. The German constitution does not require civil status to be “exclusively binary in terms of gender,” it added.


Germany’s Third Option activist organization has hailed the court’s decision. “We are completely overwhelmed and speechless. That’s a small revolution in the gender area,” the group wrote on Twitter.


I suddenly have an urge to go back and watch some more Stephen McNallen videos. The age of Wotan can’t come fast enough. The Germanic people need a miracle.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 09, 2017 10:30

November 7, 2017

H-1B Visas are Indentured Servitude

Apparently (((Joshua Brustein))) thinks it’s okay to lecture Americans on how bad it is for companies and immigrants right now who come on H-1B visas. Little does he admit that these visas make slaves of foreigners and cheat American workers out of jobs that they’d be more than willing to do. 


Donald Trump came into office promising a restrictive new approach to immigration and there has been little question about his intention to follow through — with one seeming exception. Despite its enthusiastic rhetoric about the H-1B program, which provides temporary visas to high-skilled workers, the administration failed to make significant changes in time to impact the program’s annual lottery this April, leaving some who had anticipated action fuming. It has also declined to take up any of the legislative proposals for H-1B overhaul.


But a crackdown has been in the works, albeit more quietly. Starting this summer, employers began noticing that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was challenging an unusually large number of H-1B applications. Cases that would have sailed through the approval process in earlier years ground to a halt under requests for new paperwork. The number of challenges — officially known as “requests for evidence” or RFEs — are up 44 percent compared to last year, according to statistics from USCIS. The percentage of H-1B applications that have resulted in RFEs this year are at the highest level they’ve been since 2009, and by absolute number are considerably higher than any year for which the agency provided statistics.


The H-1B program is controversial largely because IT firms based in India have used it to hire for rote computer programming jobs. These firms, like Infosys Ltd. and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., have been working to reduce their reliance on the program, in anticipation of a less receptive political landscape. The overall number of H-1B applications dropped this year for the first time in five years. The skeptical eye the government is taking to applications has extended to all types of employers, according to immigration lawyers. Many are rethinking their own use of H-1B as a result.


It’s unclear how many applications are actually being rejected. In the meantime, the uncertainly alone is taking a toll on those who rely on the visas to work. Some applicants whose cases remained unresolved by Oct. 1, the annual effective date for new visas, have been sent home from their jobs. There are no official statistics tracking how many people are in this situation, but multiple immigration lawyers said this is the first year they’re seeing it occur in any significant numbers.


Even though Silicon Valley sees the H-1B program as one of its top political priorities, this campaign of reform by red tape has avoided the frantic political fights surrounding other aspects of immigration, like the proposed travel ban or the cancellation of DACA, a program for those who came to the country as undocumented children. After the recent terrorist attack in New York, Trump called for the elimination of another visa lottery program – the Diversity Visa Lottery – saying immigration should be merit-based. This mirrors past calls his administration has made to eliminate the H-1B lottery as a way to punish those who use it improperly.


Instead, says Peter Roberts, an immigration lawyer whose clients include large multinationals and startups, the administration is punishing everyone. He said many of this year’s challenges were “beyond ridiculous, trumped-up requests — no pun intended — issued either without legal basis or making no sense from a common sense standpoint,” and questioned whether they’d stand up. “How do you change the way we live? You can change the laws, or you can change the way we interpret them,” he said. “This is the latter.”


For Centro, a company in Chicago that makes technology for ad agencies, the problems started this summer. Centro had applied for visas for three young employees who already had the legal right to work for a limited time after graduating from college. One of the applications had been chosen in the H-1B lottery. Emilie Clark, the company’s director of human resources, happily called the employee to tell him his immigration status was settled for the next three years.

But the employee called Clark back in August, terrified that something had gone wrong. He’d received a letter from USCIS saying it would reject his application unless Centro proved the position required someone with specialized skills. Clark was surprised. She’d been helping people apply for visas for four years, and this was the first time she’d ever seen such a letter.


To Clark’s eyes, the position — which consisted of writing algorithms and required knowledge of multiple programming languages as well as a solid understanding of relational data storage systems — wasn’t a borderline case. He had ended up at Centro after it hired a former manager of his, who recruited him to join the company. Clark pulled together everything the agency asked for as quickly as she could, but the employee’s status is still in limbo. (He continues to work on his initial visa.)


The man, who was born in India and went to school in the U.S., declined an interview request and asked not to be identified by name. “Every employee that we have on an H-1B, or going for any visa, they’re all really nervous,” Clark explained. Other employers and workers facing RFEs also declined to speak on the record because they were concerned doing so would impact their unresolved cases.

“We’re entering a new era,” said Emily Neumann, an immigration lawyer in Houston who has been practicing for 12 years. “There’s a lot more questioning, it’s very burdensome.” She said in past years she’s counted on 90 percent of her petitions being approved by Oct. 1 in years past. This year, only 20 percent of the applications have been processed. Neumann predicts she’ll still have many unresolved cases by the time next year’s lottery happens in April 2018.

USCIS declined an interview request, sending a written statement instead. “USCIS officers use currently existing policy that interprets existing statutory and regulatory requirements to evaluate petitions and make an eligibility determination,” it said. “As done in the past, officers evaluate each petition on a case-by-case basis to determine if a petition qualifies for the benefit being requested.” Critics of the program have always called for stricter scrutiny of applications, which fit into Trump’s broader promise for “extreme vetting” of all potential immigrants.


There are ample signs that the Trump administration has a broader overhaul in mind. It staffed the USCIS with those who worked for Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, a longtime critic of H-1B visas who in January proposed scrapping the H-1B lottery altogether in favor of a system prioritizing higher-paid jobs. A spokesperson for USCIS says that plan is still being considered. In April, Trump issued an executive order asking federal agencies to increase their scrutiny of the program. In a briefing with reporters at the time, a senior administration official floated the idea that administrative steps like raising application fees could also serve to reshape the program without the need for new laws or regulations.

Dick Burke, the CEO of Envoy, a Chicago-based immigration services firm, said many of his clients feel besieged by RFEs, which have more than doubled, and site visits, which are also up significantly. “I never try to divine the intent of anyone, particularly in terms of this administration,” he said. “But the sentiment of our customers is that they’re looking for ticky-tack violations to make things more difficult.”


Many employers have spent the last year musing whether they can continue to rely on the H-1B program at all. Clark of Centro says the company is considering relocating some employees who are having visa problems to offices overseas.


Venkat Narayanan, a partner at Aegis Company, a small software and consulting firm in the Seattle area, says his experience this year has left him afraid of the H-1B program. It’s always been a long shot. Aegis applied for a half-dozen visas this spring, and only one of them made it through the lottery. The year before, Aegis secured a visa for someone filing a type of job he’s filled with H-1B workers in the past. So Narayanan set up a client project for the prospective new employee, a woman who was living in Dehli, India, at the time.


USCIS challenged the application in August, which irked Narayanan because he had provided everything the agency had asked for. Narayanan was doubly annoyed because, without someone else to handle the new contract, it fell to him directly. For the last month, Narayanan has been spending four or five hours each morning doing the work himself, forgoing his own primary responsibility, which is to bring in new clients. “We might not make the profit we were expecting because of these issues,” he said. “We are afraid of on-boarding new H-1B employees, because of the unknown world.”


These people are NOT “skilled workers.” And the very idea that we should have standards for immigrants coming in seems to offend the author of this article. The companies that hire foreign rather than American should pay huge taxes for doing so. 


And if I may be empathetic for one moment to the foreigners who accept these visas, consider that if they quit, they get sent back (which I’m not against, but consider it). Therefore they must endure any conditions these companies set forth regardless of how inhumane or cruel they might be just to be able to stay and make more money than they can in their home country. Not enough to live well, but more than they would normally.


Companies that hire foreigners are the lowest of the low. Let their profits bleed.


Slavery isn’t dead. It just took on a new form. And that form is H-1B visas.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 07, 2017 10:05

November 6, 2017

Alt Right 101 | What is a Cuckservative? | #3

Video Version:



Audio Version on Spreaker.


Backup Audio:



https://brefaucheux.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/alt-right-101-cuckservatives-3-mp3.mp3

In This Episode We Discuss:



2:40 What is conservatism and why it has failed
7:00 Why conservatives are seen as moral cowards by the Alt Right
9:10 How conservatives betray their own base of supporters
11:52 Conservatives always disavow those to their right
14:22 The Confederate monument controversy
16:38 The “fiscally conservative and socially liberal” lie
22:18 Conservatives fail to appeal to their own
23:36 How cuckservatives draw false equivalencies with their base and the left
26:17 How conservatives often describe themselves as “progressive”
30:08 How the game has changed and conservatives don’t realize it
31:42 Democrats are the new fascists nonsense
37:25 “Spreading democracy” & “with us or against us” mentality
44:15 No, Ronald Reagan was not a good conservative
46:26 No, David Cameron was not a good conservative
49:00 Distractions used as our jobs disappear
53:37 In the end, there’s only one party

Quotes:



“Conservatives don’t want to actually reach out to their own support base. They’re too bothered about reaching out to their enemies on the left and trying to be seen as the nice guys, trying to play by their enemy’s rules, than they are to actually appealing to people who would their core voters.”
“I would wager that if I was to sit in a room with your average conservative (small C), they would find more in common with me and I would find more in common with them than either of us would have in common with some who was a rabid leftie and a member of Antifa.”
“We are not conservatives. We are not just trying to defend a point. We want to preserve western civilization, but we want to better western civilization.

Mark Collett Links:


Mark’s Book: http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

Mark’s Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/user/mark318i


Bre Faucheux links:


Website: http://brefaucheux.com/

Podcast: http://27crowsradio.com/

Support my work: https://www.paypal.me/BreFaucheux


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 06, 2017 16:45

November 5, 2017

November 3, 2017

Steven Franssen | Make Self Knowledge Great Again

Video Version:



Audio version is available on Spreaker.


Backup Audio:



https://brefaucheux.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/steve-franssen-podcast-mp3.mp3

In This Episode We Discuss:



1:05 Steve’s political awakening
5:50 How Steve discovered the Alt Right
11:27 Steven’s interest in writing
16:58 The journey to self-knowledge
21:55 How young people in the Alt Right can use self-knowledge
22:30 Carl Jung’s theory of the inner child
24:00 Self-knowledge in practice
25:45 The future of the Alt Right
29:20 How the GOP is always on the defense
32:02 Learning your audience’s perception of you
35:07 The attacks on masculinity in reality and pop culture
40:00 What is true masculinity?
43:45 Steven’s writing process
51:10 How insert lessons and principles into literature

Quotes:


– “If you sit and feel your feelings and have a dialogue with yourself, you start to come up with some interestingg tidbits that really help you with your life. I think a lot of people want easy answers. And self-knowledge is like exercising a muscle. It’s a discipline.”

– “A lot of young guys have been dispossessed of their society. This is America. Aren’t we the inheritors of America? What happened? What happened along the way? People get into history and start to understand this (self knowledge), and you can do this on a personal level too. It will make you a much more effective advocate for identitarianism, philosophy, whatever it is that you want to do, because you’ll take out the neurosis.”

– “True masculinity is about pioneering. It’s about adventuring. It’s about exploring. And yeah, there’s a bit of conquering in there. But it’s not about being a brute…feminism hijacked what masculinity means.”


Steven’s Links:



Twitter: https://twitter.com/stevefranssen

Steven’s book: https://www.amazon.com/Make-Self-Knowledge-Great-Again-Principles-ebook/dp/B06WWRVG7P/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1509727332&sr=8-1&keywords=make+self+knowledge+great+again


Bre’s Links:


Website: https://brefaucheux.com

Support my work: https://paypal.me/brefaucheux


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 03, 2017 15:00

November 2, 2017

Diversity Visa, oh the Irony!

While merit immigration won’t save us and I would of course like a complete shut down immigration, it’s hard to deny that it would be a step up. And diversity certainly isn’t a merit.


President Donald Trump is calling for “Merit Based immigration” following the deadly truck attack in New York City that killed eight people and injured 11.


Trump says on Twitter Wednesday that the driver in Tuesday’s attack “came into our country through what is called the ‘Diversity Visa Lottery Program,’ a Chuck Schumer beauty.”


Officials said the attacker is an immigrant from Uzbekistan who came to the U.S. legally in 2010. They haven’t said whether he came in through the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program, which covers immigrants from countries with low rates of immigration to the U.S.


Trump tweeted, “We are fighting hard for Merit Based immigration, no more Democrat Lottery Systems. We must get MUCH tougher (and smarter).”


Assimilation is a lie. This man had seven years to “assimilate” even though we know Islam preaches the exact opposite. It preaches to either lie to convert people to Islam or not to assimilate at all.


Bottom line, this attack was completely preventable. And that fact that the man was brought in on a ‘diversity’ visa proves what I’ve been saying all along. Diversity is bullshit.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 02, 2017 09:29

Bre Faucheux's Blog

Bre Faucheux
Bre Faucheux isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Bre Faucheux's blog with rss.