Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 26

Children Will Always Be Weapons of War

I’m sharing this spectacular piece done by Red Ice TV on how and why children are used as weapons for war, but only wars that serve a very particular purpose.

President of America, Not the World

When Ann is on, she’s ON!

War is like crack for presidents. It confers instant gravitas, catapulting them to respectability, bypassing all station stops. They get to make macho pronouncements on a topic where every utterance is seen as august.

On the other hand, Trump’s Syrian misadventure is immoral, violates every promise he ran on, and could sink his presidency.

Left to his own devices, uncontaminated by Washington group-think, Trump gets it right.

Back in 2013, when President Obama was being egged on to attack Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack far more sweeping than this latest one, Trump tweeted:

— Aug. 29, 2013:

“What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.”

— Aug. 31, 2013:

“Be prepared, there is a small chance that our horrendous leadership could unknowingly lead us into World War III.”

— Sept. 1, 2013:

“If the U.S. attacks Syria and hits the wrong targets, killing civilians, there will be worldwide hell to pay. Stay away and fix broken U.S.”

On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly stated that he had no interest in starting “World War III over Syria,” saying, “We have bigger problems than Assad.” His policy position was: “Let Syria and ISIS fight. I look at Assad — and Assad looks better than the other side.”

Trump was right on every point.

Assad is one of the least bad leaders in the entire Middle East. He’s not a murderous thug like Saddam, has no rape rooms, isn’t into jihad, protects Christians, and is fighting ISIS. He provided us with intelligence on al-Qaida after 9/11. He does not have crazy Islamic police slapping women around or throwing gays off buildings. (That would be our beloved ally, Saudi Arabia.)

Trump was also correct about Assad’s opponents being far worse, containing large helpings of both ISIS and al-Qaida.

As awful as it was to see those dead children, Trump knew that America’s first duty is to our own children.

We have never succeeded at turning a Third World dictatorship into a paradise. The history of these things is that removing a Middle Eastern strongman always makes things worse — for example, in Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Egypt.

We leap in, thinking we’re helping the poor devils under the thumb of a dictator — and then the new tribe takes over and oppresses everyone else, usually much more brutally, while hating us even more than the old tribe did.

If voters wanted more Middle Eastern wars, there were plenty of other candidates offering that: Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham, Carly Fiorina, and Hillary Clinton, for example. And we must never forget Jeb! though it proved surprisingly easy to do so in 2016.

But we picked Trump.

While most of the left wailed about the return of Nazi Germany under Trump, savvier liberals saw his vulnerability: flattery. All we have to do is praise him! You’ll be shocked at how easy it is.

And, boy, did they lay it on thick with the Syrian misadventure. No sucker’s bait was left on the floor. Cable news hosts gushed, “Trump became president of the United States tonight!” On MSNBC, Brian Williams called the bombing “beautiful” three times in less than a minute. Sen. Lindsey Graham (one of the “women of the Senate,” according to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) compared Trump to Reagan. The New York Times headlined an article, “On Syria Attack, Trump’s Heart Came First.”

My nightmare scenario: Trump and Jared watching TV together and high-fiving: DID YOU SEE THE NEWS! THEY LOVE YOU! All Trump had to do was pointlessly bomb another country, and it was as if a genie had granted his every wish.

Looking for some upside to this fiasco, desperate Trump supporters bleated that bombing Assad had sent a message to North Korea. Yes, the message is: The Washington establishment is determined to manipulate the president into launching counterproductive military strikes. Our enemies — both foreign and domestic — would be delighted to see our broken country further weaken itself with pointless wars.

Was America strengthened by the Iraq War? The apparently never-ending Afghanistan War? Vietnam? This is how great powers die, which is exactly what the left wants.

Administration policy was heading in the wrong direction at 90 mph, but thank God, Trump seems to have grabbed the steering wheel and hit the brakes. Notwithstanding the hopes and dreams of Clausewitzian military strategist Nikki Haley, we will not be engaging in regime change in Syria or starting World War III with Russia today.

We want the “president of America” back — not “the president of the world.”

I’m disappointed. I’m angry. I considered washing down the black pill with a bottle of whiskey. I often wonder if the collapse is inevitable. This previous week was proof to me that it doesn’t really matter who’s in office. The collapse might very well happen regardless. Hillary Rotten Clinton would only have gotten us there faster. She was always going to suck worse. 

Trump has already claimed that we won’t be going to war with Syria. HRC acted as though she couldn’t wait to get boots on the ground. 

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. I want to hope. But I’ll always be prepared for the worst. Especially in a world where the U.S. is still behaving as though we have the right to police the world rather than just our own country. 

Video to come on Syria soon.

 

[image error]

Elora, Bre and Rebecca – Femininity in the Modern World

I was honored to be featured again on Red Ice TV along with Elora from TheBlondeButterMaker and Rebecca from BlondeInTheBellyoftheBeast on Red Ice TV. We discussed everything from health, fertility, femininity, and dating.

I hope you enjoy it.

[image error]

To little too late

With the demographics already changed and the birth rate of whites in the country not currently at replacement levels, this might be a speech that’s a little too late for Sweden.

The Prime Minister of Sweden has vowed his country will ‘never go back’ to recent levels of mass immigration after it emerged the terrorist who killed four people in a truck attack was a failed asylum seeker.

Stefan Löfven pledged to change his country’s liberal attitude, insisting the massive influx allowed during the 2015 migrant crisis would never happen again.

Rakhmat Akilov, from Uzbekistan, hijacked the lorry and deliberately drove into pedestrians on central Stockholm’s main shopping street on Friday afternoon.

It was a copycat of the attack carried out in London last month, when Khalid Masood killed four pedestrians and injured dozens more with a Hyundai 4×4. Swedish police said there were clear similarities.

Akilov is thought to have carried out reconnaissance along his route days earlier.

Four were killed and 15 injured when he drove a 30-ton truck down a pedestrianised area and smashed into a department store. Chris Bevington, a 41-year-old father-of-two from Britain, was killed close to his office.

One can blame the liberalism gone mad in Sweden as much as they want, but until you have control of the schools and influence the children to not only take pride in their heritage but to also have a sense of self-preservation against outside threats, these words are too late for Lofven’s people.

I might hope for Sweden, but it’s a situation of hope for the best and prepare for the worst. If they don’t encourage their young to have happy healthy marriages and to out-breed their invaders, they’re days might already be numbered.

Glorification or Bust

W.T.F.

I don’t feel as though I have the qualifications or enough information to make a truthful post on the events of last night. Many Trump supporters are calling his air strike a betrayal. Morons on the left are praising it because sad pictures and muh Russia. Even bigger idiots on the left are still against Trump because Obama NEVER bombed the Middle East or Syria *coughcough*. The Alt Right is sadly discovering that if Trump can’t stop the U.S. from decline, then the decline itself is inevitable. If anything this is a strong argument for becoming a prepper like one of those weirdos who lives in the woods. 

And to anyone who says HRC would have been better, we in the Alt Right are acutely aware that HRC would have done this within her first week as President. She stated her desire to do so many times. 

I will be away from my blog for the next three to four days because I will be out of town. I intend to use some of my time waiting to hear all sides. I intend to weigh heavily on Trump’s actions. I intend to decide how I feel and make a video on it next week, although I won’t deny I’m quite disappointed at the moment. But I don’t want to be one of those people who jams subscription boxes with yet another video raining down on everyone with this opinion or another. But the fact that HRC, McCain, Graham, Al Qaeda, and ISIS are all praising the attack should tell you everything. This was a big victory for the establishment we’re fighting so hard to tear down.

In the meantime, here’s a video and a blog post by two brilliant men, Stefan Molyneux and Vox Day.

 

Vox Day’s Blog: http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/04/blunder-or-complete-debacle.html

With all that being said, the U.S. is not the international police. We don’t always know who the bad guy is. But man oh man, we like to think that we do. If getting further and further red pilled has taught me anything, it’s that the good guys in history are never who you think they are. History is a mess of he said she said and the victors always write the history books.

UPDATE: It has been suggested by Vox Day that this attack was a fake out of some sort. Again, I’m reserving overall judgement until I hear more and analyze all that’s presenting in the days to come. This is still very concerning, but it appears as though there might be a tiny white pill. Let’s hope for the best but prepare for the worst.

Brave University Professor Speaks Out Against White Extinction

The Signs of a Dying Nation

It’s painful to see a nation degrade itself into so much self-hatred that they harm their own for speaking out against the injustices being done to them.

Germany’s Cabinet on Wednesday approved a new bill that punishes social networking sites if they fail to swiftly remove illegal content such as hate speech or defamatory fake news.

Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Cabinet agreed on rules that would impose fines of up to 50 million euros (53.4 million dollars) on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms.

German Justice Minister Heiko Maas said that the companies offering such online platforms are responsible for removing hateful content. He said the new bill would not restrict the freedom of expression, but intervene only when criminal hatred or intentionally false news are posted.

Germany poses a particular problem for U.S.-owned social networking sites accustomed to American standards of free speech. Due to its Nazi past, Germany bans public Holocaust denial and any overt promotion of racism. The issue has come to the fore amid the recent influx of migrants to Germany, which has sparked a backlash among some Germans including a rise in online vitriol.

Social networks need to ensure that obviously criminal content — as defined by German law — will be deleted within 24 hours and other illegal content after seven days.

“Just like on the streets, there is also no room for criminal incitement on social networks,” Maas said.

“The internet affects the culture of debate and the atmosphere in our society. Verbal radicalization is often a preliminary stage to physical violence,” he added.

The minister pointed out that social networks don’t delete enough punishable content, citing research that he said showed Twitter deletes just 1 percent of illegal content flagged by users, while Facebook deletes 39 percent.

Maas also said that measures to combat hate speech and so-called fake news will ultimately have to be taken at the European level to be effective.

The bill still needs parliamentary approval.

If Germany’s parliament approves of this bill, I will consider Germany a lost nation. A nation that won’t let their people speak out against their own dispossession and charges their own people for merely speaking against the injustice being done to them is nothing more than a totalitarian regime with the mask of ‘tolerance’ over their bureaucrats’s wretched faces.

I can’t imagine the amount of self-hatred the Germany people have endured to allow this to happen to their once great nation.

Communism won. Slap anyone who tells you otherwise.

Deny Deny Deny!

All the reasons why the American people don’t trust the hoaxing media all wrapped up in a single day of CNN “very fake news” coverage.

Since news broke Monday that the Obama Administration’s National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, directed the “unmasking” of NSA intercepts of Trump associates, CNN has raced to shoot down the blockbuster report.

CNN Tonight’s Don Lemon went so far as to announce he would ignore the news at all costs.

While interviewing a Democratic congressman, CNN’s Chris Cuomo claimed it was “demonstrably untrue” Rice sought surveillance of the Trump team, even as that’s exactly what yesterday’s reports prove.

Over the last 24 hours, the network has also repeatedly called on its chief national security correspondent — who was also a political appointee in the Obama White House — Jim Sciutto, to dismiss the reports as a non-story; Sciutto has even excused Rice claiming ignorance of the unmasking scandal two weeks ago, arguing Rice “wasn’t aware” what unmasking Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) was referring to.

And on Tuesday’s “New Day,” anchor Alisyn Camerota openly pleaded with Sen. John McCain to write-off the news as unimportant.

Last night, Lemon began “CNN Tonight” with an announcement that the Rice report a “fake scandal ginned up by right-wing media and Trump” that he would not be baited into justifying with coverage.

“On this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending,” it’s legitimate, he said. “Nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the American people, by creating a diversion. Not going to do it.”

I find this pattern vaguely familiar.

While reading Andrew Breitbart’s ‘Righteous Indignation,’ I took careful note of how he described left wing hoaxing media outlets and how they would deliberately try to deny a story that was very plausible if it caused significant damage to their side. Breitbart was one of the key players in helping to uncover the truth being the Monica Lewinksy scandal. He pursued it because he knew that if it had been a conservative president who was sexually involved with an intern, it would make headline news instantaneously. But because the hoaxing media ignored it so much until it was un-ignorable, he wouldn’t let it go.

Sound familiar? That’s because it’s happening all over again. CNN knows that their own side is taking a hit. So they don’t want to “insult their viewer’s intelligence” by asking them to do the unthinkable and think critically.

Fewer Americans Trust Hoaxing Media

What gave it away?

While most Americans say that both traditional and online media are reporting “fake news,” they’re more than twice as likely to attribute the falsehoods to deliberate deception rather than to incompetence, a new poll by Monmouth University reveals.

Nearly two-thirds (63%) of Americans say they’re either “regularly” (27%) or “occasionally” being fed fake news by traditional major TV and newspaper outlets.

Asked to cite the reason that these media report fake news, 39% say they do it “On purpose in order to push an agenda,” while only 17% say it is “By accident or because of poor fact checking.” Another 32% denied that traditional TV and newspaper media report fake news.

Regarding online news websites, Americans are even more distrustful, as 80% say these Internet outlets post fake news either regularly (41%) or occasionally (39%).

More than half (54%) say these news websites are doing it deliberately to push an agenda – more than three times those who blame unintentional mistakes and faulty research (17%). Only 11% say online news websites do not publish fake news.

By party, Democrats are much more trusting of both traditional and online media than are either Republicans or Independents. Half (50%) of Democrats say traditional major TV and newspaper outlines do not report fake news, compared to 29% of Independents and 15% of Republicans.

Likewise, regarding online news, 21% of Democrats say these websites do not report fake news, while only 7% of Independents and 4% of Republicans are as trusting.

Anyone who trusts the mainstream media for their news is willingly allowing their own manipulation. A quick Google search or even the slightest effort on an individual’s part can help to disprove even the most casual of mainstream “news” articles.

During the election, CNN featuring nothing but articles trashing Trump, meanwhile with a huge banner to the right hand side that side “I’m With Her” along with a donation box for HRC’s campaign. Huffington Compost and Washington Compost are nothing but left wing blogs. And then the media wondered why their candidate lost the election.

As it turns it, good traditional hard working Americans don’t like being lied to, then bullied mercilessly for their decisions merely because they don’t align with the media’s view of the moral high ground.