Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 23

Put a fork in Sweden

Because’s its done. Cooked. And thoroughly burnt to a crisp.

PeterSweden @PeterSweden7

NEW RULING IN SWEDEN: People have a right to become Swedish citizens without having to prove one’s identity.

Another decision by the Swedish court that could set a troubling precedent: even though his identity is unknown, an Iraqi man – presumably, you never really can be sure with immigration agencies – was given Swedish citizenship by the Higher Migration Court in Sweden at the end of May. In the verdict (PDF) the court came to the conclusion that, because it was impossible for the defendant to go to Iraq to prove his identity:

“WF [the defendant] has therefore done what can reasonably be expected of him to strengthen his identity. WF has been a resident in Sweden for almost ten years and has maintained himself.  These details of his identity, which speak for him, provide an exemption from the claim of reinforced identity. Even though the documents provided by WF are simple acts of nature and can not strengthen his identity, they give some support for the information provided about his identity. Furthermore, WF lives in Sweden with his wife and children, who are all Swedish citizens. The Migration Supreme Court considers on overall assessment, that WF has made his identity probable and that he, therefore, can be granted exemption from the requirement to prove his identity. WF complies with others Conditions in Section 11 of the Citizenship Act for granting Swedish citizenship. The appeal must, therefore, be upheld.”

Why would any government allow for citizenship to be handed out to essentially unknown persons? What is the need? And why has the danger of allowing the right to vote to what could be a war criminal, as easily as an innocent victim of war crimes, be so overlooked? Is Swedish citizenship worth so little it can be bestowed on John Does?

The precedent the Swedish court has now established might enable and even encourage thousands of fraudulent applications.

They are not Swedish. They will never be Swedish. They have to go back.

The Swedes have been taught not to value their country, their culture, or their longevity. They’ve devalued it where anyone can become Swedish because we’re all equal. If so, why not let Palestinians walk into Israel. After all, anyone can be Israeli right?

Those who cannot perceive a threat, will not be equipped to survive it. Sweden very well may not survive their own impending and often times welcomed demographic demise.

HRC plays the pussy card. Again.

Muh Russia and muh Comey and muh misogyny still prevail!

Hillary Clinton delivered her most forceful critique of President Donald Trump’s 2016 victory on Tuesday, taking personal responsibility for her failed campaign but also pointed to the timing of a letter from FBI Director James Comey and Russian interference as factors.

It was indeed a thing of beauty. Comey’s letter couldn’t have been better timed. But then again, everyone who took that letter seriously were people who already knew she was a crook. Those already voting for her really didn’t care.

“If the election had been on October 27, I would be your president,” she told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour at a Women for Women event in New York. “I take absolute personal responsibility. I was the candidate, I was the person who was on the ballot. I am very aware of the challenges, the problems, the shortfalls that we had,” Clinton said, before adding that she was “on the way to winning until a combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me and got scared off.”

Wait wait wait… so she takes full responsibility, but Comey and Russia? That’s not taking full responsibility, sweetheart.

Clinton, who is currently writing a book that partly reflects on her 2016 loss, added, “The reason I believe we lost were the intervening events in the last 10 days.”
The event marks the latest where Clinton, in a stinging rebuke to Trump, both blames herself for the 2016 loss but also casts the current President as someone aided by outside factors, including the Russian government.

So Trump blasts Syria, a Russian ally, and threatens to indict Julian Assange who helped to get him elected via those same Wikileaks but he’s still entwined with the Russians?

Oh for the love of god…

After Clinton noted the 3 million more votes she won than Trump, Amanpour joked that the President would soon tweet about the comment.
“Fine. Better than the interfering in foreign affairs,” Clinton said. “If he wants to tweet about me than I am happy to be the diversion because we have lot of things to worry about. He should worry less about the election and my winning the popular vote than doing some other things that would be important for the country.”

Did she honestly say “better than interfering in foreign affairs?” You murdered Gaddafi, the leader of Libya! You single handedly caused the migrant crisis wreaking havoc in Europe right now through foreign intervention! Not to mention that the U.S. has openly interfered with many foreign elections. Obama told the British that they should vote for the Remain campaign. And that’s only a small example.

Clinton, aides and friends say, has grown more at peace with her loss in recent months, but is still focused on the interference by the Russian government, especially the fact that WikiLeaks began releasing John Podesta’s hacked emails hours after the damaging “Access Hollywood” Trump tape was released.

More at peace? You know that woman is suffering hard core. She looks it.

Clinton, as she has done in the past, also hung part of her 2016 loss on misogyny.
“Yes, I do think it played a role. I think other things did as well,” Clinton said.
But repeatedly, Clinton came back to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s role in the 2016 election and how he was able to tilt the scale in favor of Trump and against her.

Misogyny? Really? And yet, she claims to take personal responsibility. 53% of American women voted for Trump. That’s a lot of self-hating misogynistic women. Or maybe… just maybe… they saw you as the conniving murderer that you are! You belong in prison! Whatever happened to “Lock Her Up”? We need to make that trend again.

Killary once again plays the pussy card.

DENIED!

Black Supremacist Stabbing in Austin

But but but but but… you can’t be racist against white people! Or so I’ve been told by loving and tolerant liberals.

AUSTIN, Texas— An attacker with a machete-like knife fatally stabbed one person and wounded at least three others Monday on the University of Texas campus, and police had a suspect in custody, authorities said.

Travis County Emergency Medical Services tweeted that one person died at the scene near a gym. The others were taken to the hospital with potentially serious wounds. There also were reports of additional patients with non-life-threatening injuries, the agency said.

Student Rachel Prichett said she was standing in line at a food truck outside the gym when she saw a man with a knife that resembled a machete approach the person standing behind her.

“The guy was standing next to me,” Prichett said. “He grabbed him by the shoulder and shoved the knife in it. I just started running as fast as I could.”

Ray Arredondo, 22, said he was walking to his car when a mass of students near the gym started running.

“They were just screaming, ‘Run! Get out of here!'” Arredondo said.

He later saw what looked like CPR being performed on someone outside the front door of the gym. Another student, Arredondo said, was sitting on a bench being treated for cuts to the head or neck.

Student Peter Hasse said he saw police put a suspect in handcuffs and into a patrol car. The man in custody seemed calm, Hasse said.

Authorities cordoned off the scene to keep students away as a large contingent of state and local police, including officers in helicopters, swarmed the area.

The University of Texas is blocks from downtown Austin and the Texas Capitol building and is one of the nation’s largest universities.

The attack occurred in the central campus, just a short walk from the administration building and landmark clock tower that was scene of a mass shooting in 1966.

Remember everyone… if you fight for people of color and minorities they’ll always cherish you for your wonderful efforts and be grateful that you helped them to reach that wondrous fantasy land called “equality”. In fact, they’ll cherish you so much that they’ll prop you up as one of the good white people. They won’t slaughter you like they did to the whites in Haiti and the current white residents in South Africa who are begging to be repatriated back to the Europe. 

Just Show Up

We have no choice. We need people on the ground.

The left-wing activists behind the anti-conservative riots at Berkeley have ties to one of the nation’s most prominent pro-pedophilia organizations.

The Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights, and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary — more commonly referred to as By Any Means Necessary or BAMN — is one of the militant leftist groups waging a campaign against conservatives and Trump supporters in Berkeley. The group’s planned aggressive demonstrations against conservative commentator Ann Coulter and the students coming to hear her talk led to the cancellation of Coulter’s speech this week due to safety concerns.

BAMN’s parent organization worked directly with the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in the years just before it founded BAMN, according to NAMBLA documents reviewed by The Daily Caller. In addition, a member of that parent organization said to have founded BAMN is an admitted member of NAMBLA, which she has described as the victim of a “witch-hunt.”

BAMN, which did not return a phone call and voicemail seeking comment, was founded by the Revolutionary Workers League, a small, Detroit-based Marxist organization. Many of BAMN’s leading members over the years have also been RWL members.

When YAF turned their back on Ann Coulter, and then when Ann Coulter refused to appear at UC Berkeley, it proved one thing. Conservatives as a party aren’t capable of handling the battles that are bound to break out. They’ve conserved nothing. Standing up and speaking is always great, but when the radical left purposefully threatens and engages in violence to intimidate our side into silence, we have to show that we won’t be intimidated. YAF and Coulter backing out shows that intimidation works against the paleo conservatives. We can’t allow that to continue. We have to show up. Because at the end of the day these SJWs can be knocked over with a feather. They throw bricks, glass bottles, and spray people with pepper spray because they can’t throw punches. 

The leftists we’re fighting now are backed by a pro-pedophilia organization. We cannot allow such degeneracy to win the day. We have enough keyboard warriors. We have to show up. If that’s just attending a protest and protecting your own against flying wine bottles, so be it. I plan on doing my part. More to come.

 

PhilosoChat#23 | Bre Faucheux Discusses Cultural Marxist Subversion in the Arts

I was honored to have a discussion with Rocking Mr. E last week on the subversion of the arts through cultural Marxism. I hope you enjoy.

Alt Talk | Summer Reelz ft. Lawn Gnome

I’ve been suffering from white genocide fatigue a bit lately. So it was a lot of fun to have a conversation about movies with my dear friend, the Lawn Gnome. 

I will be gone over the weekend from my blog. I will resume the fight next week. Take care.

And the young cucks flee…

You can expect cucks to cuck cuckingly every time. Especially on college campuses.

Young America’s Foundation (YAF) has pulled out of Ann Coulter’s Thursday event at UC Berkeley, blaming the college for allowing left-wing extremists to terrorize conservatives on campus.

“When Young America’s Foundation confirmed Ann Coulter would speak at UC-Berkeley as part of YAF’s nationwide campus lecture program on April 27, we assumed UC Berkeley would take all steps necessary to ensure the safety of students attending the educational event,” the group declared in a blog post on Tuesday. “In the meantime we discovered that the University of California Police Department at Berkeley has an official ‘stand-down’ policy for any situation that develops on campus as long as the situation doesn’t involve the imminent loss of life, allowing the leftist thugs who have terrorized Berkeley’s campus to do so without consequence.”

“As of 4:00 p.m. today, Young America’s Foundation will not be moving forward with an event at Berkeley on April 27 due to the lack of assurances for protections from foreseeable violence from unrestrained leftist agitators,” they continued. “Berkeley should be ashamed for creating this hostile atmosphere.”

YAF added that they are still pushing forward with their lawsuit against the college, and that the group “looks forward to the day when First Amendment freedoms are enjoyed by conservative students.”

“Ms. Coulter may still choose to speak in some form on campus, but Young America’s Foundation will not jeopardize the safety of its staff or students,” they concluded. “For information on Ms. Coulter’s plans, please contact her directly.”

I have a very difficult time believing that YAF didn’t know that there would be massive security risks. After all, the presence of Milo and Lauren Southern didn’t go unnoticed by the Antifa who destroyed both events. And given that the police stood down on both occasions, they certainly had to know what they were getting into when Ann Coulter was initially booked. And even if they didn’t at the time, giving “safety” as an excuse is pathetic given that safety has rarely if ever been provided before.

They’re cowards. Plain and simple.

The intolerance for free speech on university campuses, particularly UC Berkeley is just one more reason why such universities need to have their funding pulled. These institutions are beyond saving. Let them fall and don’t bother wasting more money trying to save them. You can’t kill a source by chopping away the limbs. You have to get it at the root. Universities are a root for why so many young adults are graduating with little to no skills, a ton of debt they can’t pay off, and frightening socialist ideas that cause them rationalize the need for violence against those they disagree with.

Maybe the real reason Ann Coulter is a threat to the lefties is because she’s sounding more and more like an Alt Right woman every time she speaks. She even acknowledges white genocide.

Our movement is growing and it will continue to grow.

 

 

Why Men Should Avoid Teaching

Beware of the eyes!

If I had known that eye contact can lead to mental health problems, I could have missed out on so many meaningless courses in school. Sick day anyone?

Students who avoid making eye contact with their peers could be guilty of racism, according to Oxford University’s latest guidance.

The university’s Equality and Diversity Unit has advised students that “not speaking directly to people” could be deemed a “racial microaggression” which can lead to “mental ill-health”.

Other examples of “everyday racism” include asking someone where they are “originally” from, students were told.

Oxford University’s Equality and Diversity Unit explains in its Trinity term newsletter that “some people who do these things may be entirely well-meaning, and would be mortified to realise that they had caused offence.

“But this is of little consequence if a possible effect of their words or actions is to suggest to people that they may fulfil a negative stereotype, or do not belong”.

Universities have been accused of pandering to the “snowflake generation” of students, who are seen as over-sensitive and quick to take offence.

Dr Joanna Williams, a lecturer in higher education the University of Kent, said the guidance was “completely ridiculous” and will make students “hyper-sensitive” about how they interact with one another.

“Essentially people are being accused of a thought crime,” Dr Williams told The Telegraph. “They are being accused of thinking incorrect thoughts based on an assumption of where they may or may not be looking.”

Dr Williams, who is author of Academic Freedom in an Age of Conformity, said that Oxford University’s guidance was “overstepping the mark” by telling students “how they should feel and think”.

 I think it’s safe to say that the university overstepped the mark when they actually thought implementing a Equality and Diversity Unit was a good idea.



So not making eye contact is racist. Soon making eye contact will be deemed racist as well. Only one way to fix this. We can’t have eyes.

#NotAllEyes

Wait, that’s not it.

#EyeControl

No. No. No.

#EyePrivilege

Yeah. That works!

Muh diversity = no writing

The sacred publishing industry will shoot themselves in the foot before admitting that their push for diversity is doing exactly what I always said it would do. Drive people apart.

The end result of this “cultural appropriation” craze is that there’s no place for a white writer. I’ve been told by several editors to change names so that it has a “more diverse representation”. In essence, I’m told that I can’t put in a western civilization caucasian culture through names (of course, as a Hispanic writer, I may be culturally appropriating that now that I think about it…). If you can’t write that, and you can’t write other cultures, the logical conclusion is you’re NOT ALLOWED TO WRITE.

This is crazy in the land of the free, censoring what can be said and told only by certain segments of the population. It’s gotten so far out of hand that I’m to the point where I’ve advocated against gatekeepers before: but I think it’s high time writers write-off all traditional publishing. If this is the end result, you cannot create what you want, you cannot think the way you think, you cannot have been unfortunate to be born with a certain skin color, you cannot worship God and be outspoken about it, you cannot vote the wrong way and have it be known. That’s a lot of cannots! And that mentality is squashing the pool of artistic talent out there, as well as killing sales. Readers don’t want to be told what’s appropriate for them to read either.

Write what we want and stick to the narrative. Otherwise you have committed wrong think and shall be expelled!

I’ve heard of white writers being forced to change their name. Particularly male authors. For women who love claiming muh oppression for not getting published or for PoC doing the same, there are an awful lot of white males using female pen names to get published these days. And it works. The link above for this article talks about it.

If you’re white and male, don’t bother with traditional publishers. Don’t give worth to their constant need for validation. And don’t ever let them clarify your own.