XistentialAngst's Blog, page 88
August 14, 2016
fandeadgloves:
bug-catcher-in-viridian-forest:
I was looking...

bug-catcher-in-viridian-forest:
I was looking at the screenshot from @fandeadgloves‘s meta, and that next to Sholto is the human bi flag.
Omg you’re totally right! Hilarious and awesome. I went and rewatched the moment. I like how Small pulls the pink(gay) lady from behind the blue (strait) lady into position to form the flag. Then he pushes Sholto out from behind the bearded man in the blue shirt toward the bi flag and stabs him in the same move. WTF. I love it. :D @vanetti
August 13, 2016
M for mutant
Since ASIP we’ve been wondering what exactly Moriarty is. A man, an organization? Whatever it is, it mutates.
Mutates into what it kills within itself. And the animals linked to them serve as a symbol.
…eh, what?
Let’s see the villains linked to animals and what happens to said villains, and the things M-Theory has to say about them:
S1 Ep 2 villain, General Shan, gets killed with a shot to her head. Had Zhi Zhu as a subordinate. Zhi Zhu was known as a Bird Spider. Jim Moriarty is known as a spider in S2.
S2 Ep 3 villain Jim Moriarty is linked to magpies (the Thieving Magpie in the Crown Jewels theft and the magpie wax seal): “shots” himself in the head. Mary is linked to magpies in S3.
S3 baddie Charles A. Magnussen, known as a shark, gets killed/ SHOT IN THE HEAD.
S4 baddie will be linked to sharks, that is if we believe what we saw in last setlock. AND GUESS HOW THEY WILL DIE PLEASE LET IT BE MARY SO SHE GETS A SHOT IN THE HEAD, PLEASE
Ok that’s cool, but what the everloving fuck does this means?!?
Interesting stuff on the villains. I really hope we get some backstory in S4 (on Mary/Moriarty). Is CAM really dead? We’ll see!
I believe in tjlc but I can't believe that Irene wasn't romantically attracted to Sherlock. I watched HLV again, when Sherlock is dying Moriarty says 'The Woman will cry' Why would she cry if everything she did was just an act? Unless it wasn't.
Hey Nonny,
No no, I totally get where you are going with this, and I had to sit and think about this.
This is taking place in Sherlock’s mind palace, and SHERLOCK THINKS Irene fell in love with him. Perhaps he still thought that when she went to rescue her. And I think in a way, she did; she respects a kindred spirit and wants the best for Sherlock. But I don’t believe she was IN love with him. There was an intellectual attraction, certainly, and loved him for his devotion to John. In his mind palace, Irene is representative of his lust and desires, so he translated that into her physical self being sad at his death.
That’s honestly the best I’ve got for you. I welcome other interpretations.
constancecream:
watsrn:
This blog is the story of two men and their frankly...
"In general we are reminded that the word ‘heimlich’ (heimisch) is not unambiguous, but belongs to..."
-
Freud’s essay Uncanny (x)
The Johnlock narrative and the choice of “Hamish” for John Watson’s middle name.
(via mathildalocks)
Why John’s bisexuality is the MOST important reveal BBC Sherlock can orchestrate
Dr John Watson is bisexual in canon, granted I think he leans towards the gay side of the Kinsey scale, and have taken into account his genesis in the Victorian era which caused him to be socially prone to relationships with women, but all in all I believe John is bisexual in canon. In BBC Sherlock, John’s bisexuality is repressed, and by preponderance, he courts females. However in our show our version of John falls deeply in love with men whilst keeping women at an emotional distance. It’s beautiful in it’s complexity and nuance, a person centred, in depth look at a bisexual man. One to be studied, no doubt, in the context of the evolution of Dr Watson and bisexuality on screen.
Now once we get the reveal, the confirmation of John and Sherlock as a couple, there will be a huge song and dance in the media about ‘gay Holmes and Watson’, we will hear and read a great deal about a ‘gay’ Sherlock Holmes, and I am betting that John’s bisexuality will get less recognition. Because you see bisexuality is the great unknown, the big fear of hetero-normativity. [Now some sarcasm] Far more a threat than gay men or lesbians, because after all you can ‘tell’ who they are! You can segregate them. But the bisexuals? They hide in the straight’s midst and they are so sneaky and confusing that it’s best to just pretend they don’t exist. Society still does not understand or even recognise bisexuals. If a man checks out a woman then he MUST be straight, if a woman is married to a man then she must be straight, right? Right?
Bisexuality is not even a consideration. Sexual fluidity is not understood. Therefore to have John Watson, with his history of girlfriends and a wife, to finally end up deeply and irrevocably in love with a man, will be of the utmost importance. Of course there will be anger over it, rejection of it’s authenticity, feelings of being tricked by the writers [het baiting] and accusations of pandering to the fan base, but once all the fuss dies down, there will be, on film, a deeply nuanced journey of a male bisexual, and that my friends is a big fucking deal. Thank God, they chose Martin Freeman to give us this multilayered performance over the course of 7 years, as he has been stellar in his portrayal of one man’s journey to discover himself and true love. [And I haven’t even seen his performance in series 4 yet]
Revealing Sherlock as a gay man in TSOT was bold, it was beautiful, but not as ground breaking as the reveal of John as a bisexual man will be, THIS is the thing that the heteronormative viewpoint will not have seen, will not expect. The writers were correct in clarifying Sherlock’s sexuality earlier than John’s. [Yes they threw in the clue of Sholto, but that will have gone under the radar for most het viewers] Just to finally witness the struggles of a bisexual journey on screen is groundbreaking, but the response will speak volumes of the society we live in and the lack of even basic recognition of the bisexual next door, or across the desk, in the seat next to us on the tube or on the bus, or even in the same bed.
Dr John Watson has been bisexual all this time, over 130 years, and we are on the cusp of seeing this man in all his glory. The bisexuality that was so misunderstood, so ignored, that it precluded a vast amount of people for over a century, to realise they were reading an epic love affair.
ironerik:
“The mirror of erised. It shows us nothing more or...

Sherlock finds the mirror of the erised and as he looks into it he sees John step up behind him.

"Oh, John, I was just-" he whirls around but John's not there.

(bonus)
“The mirror of erised. It shows us nothing more or less than the deepest, most desperate desire of our hearts.”
based on this.
awesome
waitingforgarridebs:
bug-catcher-in-viridian-forest:
I was...

bug-catcher-in-viridian-forest:
I was looking at the screenshot from @fandeadgloves‘s meta, and that next to Sholto is the human bi flag.
![]()
Do you remember when @shipperpenguin88 found the human rainbow flag following Sherlock in TEH? (x)
XistentialAngst's Blog
- XistentialAngst's profile
- 15 followers
