Muhammad Rasheed's Blog, page 3
April 9, 2025
The Corrosion of Quality Boxing

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Corrosion of Quality Boxing." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.
CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:
M. Rasheed on YouTube!
M. Rasheed on BitChute!
**************************
Q: Why doesn't Deontay Wilder take boxing lessons? He has been boxing fairly seriously for a while now and seems fairly athletic, and yet his skills are universally criticized as very deficient. Is there a reason he doesn't fix that?
Muhammad Rasheed - There are three components to becoming a boxer:
1.) Physical Fitness.
Boxing is a very physically demanding activity, and to pull it off and hope to win against game opponents you must have your body conditioned to high levels of strength, speed, stamina/endurance and well-tuned reflexes.
2.) Skill in Techniques.
Mastery of the weapons of boxing — how and why to be on your guard, how and why to be in the correct and proper stance and maintain it while moving in any direction, how to punch correctly, how to correctly throw the different kinds of punches and why they are thrown— is critical to enabling you to inflict effective offense while protecting your body from damage in return.
3.) Battle Strategy.
The ability to penetrate the opponent’s defense by using tried & true game play, forcing openings with clever combinations and thinking-on-your-feet weakness exploitation, maximizing personal strengths to dominate exploited weakness, skillful usage of ring generalship to corner the opponent and set traps, are all the difference between mere competence versus true mastery of ‘The Sweet Science.’
Boxing trainers no longer teach all three of these to the fighters (I doubt the new generation of trainers even know them) because the sport of boxing doesn’t cater towards the knowledgeable true fans of the discipline. Instead they accommodate the ignorance of the ‘casual fan’ who doesn’t appreciate the high-level chess match of two superbly skilled technicians trying to solve the other’s puzzle; all they want to see is the crude slug-fest brawl such as can be found in a drunken bar fight. Consequently, boxers have grown less and less skilled in the actual ‘Sweet Science’ of the discipline with each passing era, until today we find a dominant heavyweight champion in the form of Deontay Wilder [this post was written 6-years ago].
Bursting with extreme natural talent, a ferocious fighting heart, focused passion and commitment to hard work in the gym to throw ALL of his eggs into the first boxing component of physical fitness, Wilder has demonstrated that this alone is enough to plow through a division of fighters who really don’t know what they are doing when squaring off against another game fighter. Yet the big men aren’t the only ones deficient in the basic powers of a professional boxer. The celebrated 50–0 record of Floyd “Money” Mayweather, Jr. and his seemingly uncanny ability to make the vast majority of his wins against quality opponents look easy, owes a great deal of that to the fact that he is uniquely superbly trained in the above listed three components of boxing by his very old school father and uncle. His opponents couldn’t beat him because they really didn’t know how to fight!
For example, in the Mayweather vs. Robert Guerrero fight, although the challenger was very fit, he never tried to use any actual boxing techniques/strategy to neutralize Mayweather’s effectiveness—he just spent the entire fight doing the literal exact same thing and getting more and more flustered. By contrast, after spending a few rounds feeling Guerrero’s style out, Floyd drew upon his large repertoire of tools and used what was most effective against the opponent in front of him, with zero adjusted counter response from Guerrero.
Watching Deontay Wilder fight Tyson Fury was frustrating because I was rooting for the champion to win, but it was clear that if Wilder really knew how to fight correctly, he would have penetrated Fury’s sloppy, rudimentary guard earlier to put him away. His raw talent and superior endurance alone were enough to carry him through until he was finally able to catch Fury for the controversial draw, but for the sequel, I would very much like to see Wilder get his boxing skills up so we don’t have to see these two unnecessarily wade out into the deep waters of the later rounds again. Based on how the boxing entertainment industry flows, however, I’m not holding my breath for such a miracle.
See Also:
To Socially Engineer a Plastic Great White Hope by M. Rasheed
The Art of Greed by M. Rasheed

________________________________
Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!


March 29, 2025
Hy Eisman (27 Mar 1927 – 27 Mar 2025)

Hy Eisman was my lettering teacher at the Joe Kubert School of Cartoon and Graphic Art, Inc. in the mid-1990s.
One day, he saw me drawing my Fleischer Bros animation inspired version of Popeye, and he had me get up, sat at my desk, and drew a signed drawing of Popeye for me in his own comic strip model style. He also gave me lots of tips & pointers in how to use the dip pens he insisted we learn. I took to the Speedball B-6 so well, that when he saw my classwork pages, Hy assumed I was cheating and using the Rapidograph® tech pens (which I actually despised). He expressed genuine pleasure when I assured him I was using the B-6 as instructed, and he went out of his way to give me additional tricks & tips for my tool kit. I took this success at my first time using the Speedball B-6 as a sign that cartooning was indeed my calling, and not just a stubborn wish I held onto. This experience was very precious to me because the viciously anti-cartooning attitude of my undergrad illustration teachers contrasted absurdly with Hy's demonstrated loving-kindness in teaching me the skills of my chosen medium.
Hy was very old school in his approach, and believed in the 'drilling-to-mastery' teaching style of the classic schoolmarm. I had zero problems with his class, nor with him, and genuinely appreciated every moment.

February 12, 2025
A Confederate in the Midst

ADOS Advocacy Foundation - 🇺🇸 Happy Black History Month! Here are three takeaways from the Kendrick’s halftime show.
Mike Drake - It's just strange that black folks took such a long time to come around to Trump ? Democrats forced you through legislation to live in poverty. To live with terrible education. America is a pretty simple place the more you contribute to the benefit of the country the more Pride you have in it regardless of what anybody else has ! No the government may not always like you and there are plenty of people in the world no matter what color they are you should steer clear of ? Take pride in your home you have as much rights to it and obligation to it has anyone else
Muhammad Rasheed - @Mike... ADOS is not a pro-Trump/pro-GOP movement. Why are you here spreading misinformation?
Mike Drake - @Muhammad... I have a different stake in the game much more serious than Trump my family helps start this country. Tread lightly and have a good day sir
Muhammad Rasheed - lol My family helped start the country, built it and kept it on track to even becoming a country during its darkest days. You can tread lightly and be less enthusiastic about spreading misinformation. Thanks.
Raymond Brown - @Muhammad... That’s what they do!!
Andrea Carter - @Mike... Trump had nothing to do with the artistic messaging. Have you been under a rock this past year to not know about the message Kendrick was sending Drake and all global siphoned who flatten Black culture? There are young GenZ Black Brits on TikTok who have recently been getting skewered by their overreach in not knowing they think they are us and don't know that we are not flat with them running us. It had to be done: the message. And even on a micro level, it was about Black Americans descended of US Chattel slavery who grew up in that area of Los Angeles. Not Georgia, not NY, not Hawaii. While we cousins around the country took pride, we knew even on the micro level we are not them. But he let thst slide because we are kinfolk who can also have their backs to anthem "not like us". This isn't a song Black Canadians, those from Africa, or the Caribbean can gesture to us because we don't want to be like them. So, none of the show is/was about the Trump Effect. It was bound to play out this artistry no matter who won the election. This was a long overdue missive to Black interlocuters to stop it.
Mike Drake - @Andrea... black Americans need to respect they are Americans you were put in cages in Africa by your black brothers and sisters when you continued to war against them and lost ! You were then sold to the Dutch East India Company and brought to the United States. Half my family killed the other half of my family for the dream of freedom. Not because anybody had any notion of freedom for black folks in the world at the time. And if they didn't if the United States didn't do that whether you like it or not whether that's fair or not to say you would still be living in dung Huts in Africa there are still people doing that ! You don't have to respect me or the president learn to respect yourself. Respect a debt that you can never pay back to this country and the citizens that died for you not one minute of it 600,000 ! Don't give me a minute of blah blah blah it was so horrible of course it was it was bad for the Irish it was bad for f****** everyone except for an elite few members of the world it's still the same problem ! You like the idea of division because it makes you look special or gives you some form of power or Equity but it's a joke. And no I don't watch football since they've been taking a knee but from what I hear so was Kendrick Lamar's performance a joke
Annette Wilcox - Mike... Our history predates Trump by centuries. Unfortunately rappers have always been fascinated with his gilded BS since the 80s. Unfortunately, Blacks who voted for him (and everyone else) will learn the hard way that all that’s shiny isn’t gold. Trump‘s number one interest is himself and mark my word he will sell Black people down the river faster than  Andrew Johnson.
Dams have given lip service to black issues for the last 30 years, but Republicans haven’t given anything. It’s always been a choice in the US between the good cop bad cop.
Muhammad Rasheed - Mike wrote: "black Americans need to respect they are Americans"
The American Descendants of Slavery respect our country that we built, and our own hefty & unique contributions to her culture, more than anyone. We're the only American citizens who don't have another national flag to wave—the USA is the only country we know.
Mike wrote: "put in cages in Africa by your black brothers and sisters"
That line is ignorant. Our ancestors were captured by ethnic enemies that didn't even speak our people's language.
Mike wrote: "Half my family killed the other half of my family for the dream of freedom. Not because anybody had any notion of freedom for black folks in the world at the time"
More ignorance. The Confederates tried to expand the American cotton planter enterprise farther South, and the president refused. So they waged war. The Union soldiers were losing until the president allowed my enslaved ancestors to fight in exchange for our freedom—that's how the war was ultimately won.
Mike wrote: "Respect a debt that you can never pay back to this country and the citizens that died for you not one minute of it 600,000 !"
Yet MORE ignorance. Your ancestors fought in the Civil War as paid soldiers with benefits to keep the nation together. That's why you fought. My people fought for the promise of freedom from the shackles. The US government owes my people Reparations for both the 230-years of chattel slavery, and the next 150-years of domestic terror and discrimination up to the present day. We don't owe you anything. In fact, members of your clan were still receiving Civil War era pensions just until the last 20-years or so.
Mike wrote: "you would still be living in dung Huts in Africa"
Africa looks the way it does right now because the European Imperialists destroyed it over the last 500-years to turn it into their personal playground and reap the resources without having to pay sovereign nations market prices.
Mike wrote: "You don't have to respect me or the president learn to respect yourself."
You're lecturing from a position of hostile, biased ignorance. Advocating for myself and my own people in our own country IS an act of self-respect, doofus.
Mike wrote: "it was it was bad for the Irish"
This is a myth. The Irish took part in the American slave institution and were enriched from it. They themselves were never slaves, but paid indentured servants.
Mike wrote: "it was bad for f****** everyone"
It was worse for us. We were slaves and we had to legally put up with your savage barbarity with no one to advocate for us.
Mike wrote: "except for an elite few members of the world it's still the same problem !"
An elite few that YOU currently support and demand they give you privilege over my people—the same as back then. smh
Mike wrote: "You like the idea of division"
You created the division, both the wealthy among you and your poor. YOU created the racial division in the nation by enforcing my enslavement and the later jim crow laws. YOU like the idea of division because you are the only one who actually benefitted from it. What the f*ck are you talking about?
Mike wrote: "because it makes you look special or gives you some form of power"
That's literally the reason YOIU created the nation's racial division so you could be the "white" privileged class, you hypocritical idiot.
Mike wrote: "And no I don't watch football"
Why did you go out of your way to post your ignorant tripe in these comments?
Mike wrote: "since they've been taking a knee"
You agree with police brutality and the broken criminal justice system then?
Mike wrote: "but from what I hear"
From whom?
Mike wrote: "so was Kendrick Lamar's performance a joke"
It was actually great. You're just an anti-Black American racist.
Mike Drake - @Muhammad... I love yall to much not to call you out on bullsh!t ! But I don't try to hate anyone. All I wisj for yall is your best and maybe more ! Look there is always love there. Sometimes we need to call each other out ? But not because we wish each other the evils of the world! Because eventually we are supposed to be at one table regardless of it being many.
Muhammad Rasheed - Mike wrote: "I love yall to much not to call you out on bullsh!t !"
You don't know enough to discern between bullsh*t and truth. And your white supremacist biases prevent you from caring to fix the deficiency.
Mike wrote: "But I don't try to hate anyone."
Yet, you believe wishing ADOS remained in a permanent subserviently state is somehow an expression of "love." You sound like a sociopath.
Mike wrote: "All I wisj for yall is your best"
Our BEST is to be economically included in the open free markets as wealth-building ownership equals with whites, and to be paid what our government owes us for generations of accrued discrimination.
Mike wrote: "Look there is always love there."
Love consists of more than shallow platitudes, Mike.
Mike wrote: "Sometimes we need to call each other out ?"
In order to do that from a position that actually holds value, you need to start with TRUTH—not the fabricated ideologies of our most hated enemies.
Mike wrote: "But not because we wish each other the evils of the world! Because eventually we are supposed to be at one table regardless of it being many."
We don't wish evil on anyone; all we want is to finally be free in our own country and enjoy the benefits & privileges long withheld from us.
*************************************
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Confederate in the Midst." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


February 9, 2025
Great White Hopes, Thoughts & Racism
[original cartoon image pending]
Jonny "Bones" Jones - In 24 hours I’ll be making a huge announcement! #Andstill
@DannyH0214 - Wouldn’t it be “and still” if Tom wins? He’s already the defending champ
Muhammad Rasheed - Tom isn't any kind of champ. All he has is an intervening period, provisional/temporary belt that should have vanished the second Jon walked into the Octagon with Stipe.
@Chetmagnum - You’d be right if you weren’t so wrong. Tom is still listed as the Interim on the official rankings, and is the real undisputed champ in the eyes of 90% of this sports fanbase
Muhammad Rasheed - Chet wrote: "You’d be right if you weren’t so wrong"
I'm very right.
Chet wrote: "Tom is still listed as the Interim"
That fake title should've vanished at the moment of JonesVsMiocic
Chet wrote: "of this sports fanbase"
Boxing & MMA have the objectively worst fans in all of sports.
@DannyH0214 - You’re one of the fans brother
Muhammad Rasheed - Hm. Am I?
If that were true, I'd watch this upcoming du Plessis vs. Strickland 2 horsesh*t.
I just want to fast forward to whatever this is that Jon is planning.
I'm a fan of the concept of "mixed-martial arts" and its potential—potential demonstrated by the Franklin vs Silva I and Rua vs Jones fights.
I'm not a fan of the culture that the worst fans in all of sport have grown & cultivated. I HATE these f*cks...
@MMAlcoholic69 - So you’re wrong then basically? Should is just your option dumb ass. Also Jon is gay
Muhammad Rasheed - MMAlcy wrote: "So you’re wrong then basically?"
I'm not wrong at all. Being sick of your never-ending sh*t is the righteous position.
MMAlcy wrote: "Should is just your option dumb ass"
I thought you lot were supposed to be dying off from heroin ODs and depression or whatever? Please hurry.
MMAlcy wrote: "Also Jon is gay"
No, this is just classic projection. All white males are homosexual. You can tell by the humor theme throughout your Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) flick, combined with your sociopathic derision of Captain Marvel (2019) and the She-Hulk show.

@MMAlcoholic69 - Very weird guy aren’t you mate, nevermind your obsession with another man but seriously what on earth are you talking about?
Muhammad Rasheed - "Mate?"
Where are you from, worthless? Australia? UK?
MMAlcy wrote: "what on earth are you talking about?"
1.) Your entire demographic is homosexual
2.) You like to project that fact on everyone else
3.) You hate your race's own women with a sociopathic passion as a key trait of your 'White Brosky' homosexual lifestyle.
@MMAlcoholic69 - My man what is wrong with you 😂 all these gay accusations while you idolise another man. I thought homosexuality was against your religion. You want to talk about demographics let’s talk about how you lot marry your cousins. You’re all inbred half breeds
Muhammad Rasheed - Tell me who can possibly be more hypocritical than your weird-ass clan?
Do you even bother to check the transcripts of the last thing you posted before you start typing? lol #ignorant

MMAlcy wrote: "while you idolise another man"
I worship only God. You believe anything less than blind support for what a racist white homo says is idol-worship, huh?
MMAlcy wrote: "I thought homosexuality was against your religion"
More projection. Tsk.
MMAlcy wrote: "let’s talk about how you lot marry your cousins. You’re all inbred half breeds"
You appear to have me confused with the Ishmaelites. Most Muslims aren't Arabs, bud. You should pick up a book one day and try to actually learn something other than new sodomy techniques.
@MMAlcoholic69 - I think you might be confused about your own religion. There’s a reason followers of your religion are fleeing to Christian/western nations like mine. The only successful Muslim countries are ones built on slavery and blood with zero freedom. And you live in America😂😂 go home
Muhammad Rasheed - MMAlcy wrote: "I think you might be confused about your own religion"
You literally confused me with a Semite ethnic group. Cousin-marrying is not part of my own ethnic group's culture. In fact, YOU are more likely to do it than I am.
MMAlcy wrote: "There’s a reason followers of your religion are fleeing to Christian/western nations like mine"
This is so stupid. 🙄 There are almost 2-billion Muslims world-wide from literally every single ethnicity and nationality, but you think they are all the same. smdh
MMAlcy wrote: "The only successful Muslim countries are ones built on slavery and blood with zero freedom"
lol You don't actually know anything about Muslim countries, and you—as a white—hate it when non-whites have freedom. So why even bring it up?
MMAlcy wrote: "And you live in America"
Duh. My people built America.
@MMAlcoholic69 - All that talk yet we all know your fuckers marry your cousins 😂 all at war in your own countries so you flee to successful western societies. Your people didn’t build shit except the worst culture the world has ever seen. You’re a little nerd quit talking tough pussy 😂😂
Muhammad Rasheed - MMAlcy wrote: "All that talk yet we all know your fuckers marry your cousins"
I'm not an Arab.

MMAlcy wrote: "all at war in your own countries"
The USA is my country. It's the only flag I know. Modern nationalism wasn't even a thing when my ancestors were forcefully brought to North America.
@MMAlcoholic69 - You’re all the same. If it’s not your own family you marry it’s little kids. Best part is you’ve been calling me white but I’m darker than you bruh 😂corny lil nerd
Muhammad Rasheed - MMAlcy wrote: "so you flee to successful western societies"
The obscene great wealth of Western society was built from my people's free slave labor, chief.
MMAlcy wrote: "Your people didn’t build shit"
Except Western Civilization as you know it with our blood, sweat & tears. Don't forget THAT part.
MMAlcy wrote: "except the worst culture the world has ever seen"
Meanwhile, the entire world mimics my culture lustfully, and actively tries to steal it for themselves, like we were Ancient Egypt. lol
MMAlcy wrote: "You’re a little nerd quit talking tough pussy 😂"
Believe whatever you like. 😇
MMAlcy wrote: "You’re all the same"
♪ Theeere's the racist white douche bag we all know. ♫
You couldn't hold that sh*t in even for an extra minute, could you? lol Worthless ass...
@OGRickDiggler - Who beat the current champ to win their title, Jon or Tom? Neither. Until they fight each other their belts are no different
Muhammad Rasheed - Jon has the championship belt. That's VERY different from the fake intervening period, provisional/temporary interim belt that was only provided due to impatience & jackassery.
@OGRickDiggler - Intervening what does that even mean here? Neither beat the champ to get their belt, Jon beat 1 guy in the division who lost to the champ and was gifted the belt, let's not act like he is some HW juggernau, he got the title based on his name and what he did at LW.
Muhammad Rasheed - Rick wrote: "he got the title based on his name and what he did at LW"
Yes, Jon got the title based on his past accomplishments and that performance against Gane.
Aspinall is overhyped because he's the current Great White Hope of this period.
Rick wrote: "Intervening what does that even mean here?"
It means that while the recognized champion was healing, the company impatiently fabricated a fake title in the meantime.
@OGRickDiggler - The word is interim, not intervene.. and as I said neither guy beat the champ to be the champ. Jones' belt doesn't mean any more when he got it off one fight in the division against a guy who lost to the former champ, then he fights a washed Stipe..
Muhammad Rasheed - Rick wrote: "The word is interim, not intervene.."
lol Intervening is one of the defining terms for interim. Jesus you're dumb.
Rick wrote: "and as I said neither guy beat the champ to be the champ"
It's just as stupid now as the first time you said it.
Rick wrote: "Jones' belt doesn't mean any more"
It means whatever the governing body that controls it wants it to mean, i.e., that Jon is the current recognized champion. lol
@OGRickDiggler - His past accomplishments in another division.. Aspinall has hype because of his accomplishment at HW, accomplishment Jon will never attain.
Muhammad Rasheed - Rick wrote: "Aspinall has hype because of his..."
...Great White Hope status given him by a legion of uncouth white racists.
Rick wrote: "accomplishment at HW"
Tom's accomplishments are mid. Jon's goal was to move up to HW and dominate and to defeat The Greatest HW of All Time™. Anything else is extra.
@DannyH0214 - Racist much?
Muhammad Rasheed - lol
The only reason you want Tom to win is because you hate the very idea of a dominant Black American champion, but you think calling you out on your classic anti-Black racism is "racist."
What an uncouth clown you are, hillbilly. lol
@DannyH0214 - I’m not even white? Do some research clown. I’m anti drugs and PEDs. Idc if Jon is Black, Indian, white, or Asian. He’s still the heavily disputed heavyweight champ and a cheater. You should tell the UFC the definition of interim and not us because they’re the ones that still have Tom as champ.
Muhammad Rasheed - Danny wrote: "I’m not even white?"
The question mark means you're unsure? lol
Stop lying to me, boy. Grow up.
Danny wrote: "He’s still the heavily disputed heavyweight champ"
lol He's not disputed. You clowns are just butthurt racists.
Danny wrote: "and a cheater"
🤣 #ClownWorld
Danny wrote: "You should tell the UFC the definition of interim and not us because"
No need. They're just coddling their racist fanbase.
@OGRickDiggler - If there's an interim champ, the champions belt is in fact disputed you fucking retard.
Muhammad Rasheed - The interim belt was put out there because the butthurt racists like you were trying to sabotage the champ's career while he was healing from his injury.
His championship status was never in dispute. You're just a bunch of assholes.
@DannyH0214 - It was a fun debate until you ruined it making it about race because it’s your only defense for a wife beating drug taking black man. Cheers and have a good day.
Muhammad Rasheed - Danny wrote: "It was a fun debate"
How was it a debate? 🤨 Do you even know what that means?
Danny wrote: "a wife beating drug taking"
lol Literally all of your favorite white entertainers are wife-beating drug addicts, and you celebrate them for it. #RacistHypocrites
@OGRickDiggler - Buddy, you're making racist comments and saying others are racist? If Jones was white you wouldn't be sick riding him so much.
Muhammad Rasheed - I didn't make any racist comments. 🤷🏼♂️
If Jon was white, it's true that I'd probably barely know who he was, just as much as you are seething in resentment that the greatest fighter in the sport is a Black American🇺🇸.
You HATE it, don't you? 😏
@OGRickDiggler - Buddy, one of my favorite fighter is/was DC.. see you like you, I don't like fighters or people for that matter based on their skin color, and that's the difference between a racist like yourself and me.
Muhammad Rasheed - "I don't like fighters or people for that matter based on their skin color"
Me neither. You saw I pointedly posted the USA flag emoji, right? What does that tell you? Is Old Glory "racial?"
@OGRickDiggler - You're really reaching to try to deny your racism.. why lie and act like you aren't
Muhammad Rasheed - Just Google what "racism" means, read the definition, and unfuck yourself, please.
@OGRickDiggler - I know the meaning you dimwit, that's why I said you're a racist. Why do you insist that you're not?
Muhammad Rasheed - Rick wrote: "I know the meaning"
You CLEARLY do not. 🙄
Just look up the definition, read it, comprehend it, and unfuck yourself. There's a lad.
@OGRickDiggler - You're allowing your emotions to get the better of you, clearly you're racist toward white people and for some reason you think everyone can't see your bullshit facade.
Muhammad Rasheed - You don't know what "emotions" are either, huh?
Add that one to your list.
Rick wrote: "and for some reason"
I expect you to lie. That's your thing.
@OGRickDiggler - So you're just going to continue saying people don't know what words mean as a away to deflect from your obvious racism? Pretty telling that you have known defense for your racism when that's what you fall back on. Just admit you are..
Muhammad Rasheed - Rick wrote: "So you're just going to continue saying people don't know what words mean"
It's easy because people give away what they actually know when they start running their mouths. You can practically read their minds, while they imagine they're pulling a fast one or bluffing.

@OGRickDiggler - This is hilarious.. you started running your racist mouth, got called on it while and thought you were pulling a fast one on people and have been deflecting ever since.. hello pot, kettle calling!
Muhammad Rasheed - What did I say that was racist towards whites? 😏 Post the screenshot and let's analyze it together. #TeachableMoment
You're one of those guys who prides himself on "fast-talking" with the "gift-of-gab." You think it makes you superior to people with formal education, but you also use your rudimentary skills to commit petty grifts.
This is a slimeball cultural trait, not one of intelligence.

Weaponizing an Old, Clownish, Cultural Trait for Racism Support by M. Rasheed
#MRasheedCartoons #ReadYourSowell

(i'll assume the headsets link up to ChatGPT)
@OGRickDiggler - Lol you're still doing it 😅👍
Muhammad Rasheed - Go ahead and post your proof that I've been racist against whites. Let's see it so we can wrap this up.
@OGRickDiggler - You could've wrapped it up a long time ago and just admitted you're a racist but you want to continue to deflect and talk in circles like every racist trying to put on the facade that they're not racist.
Muhammad Rasheed - Just post your screenshot proof so we can analyze it together, please.
@OGRickDiggler - Still keeping the act up huh?
Muhammad Rasheed - Anytime you're ready. Let's go.
@OGRickDiggler - Am I the "Great white hope"
Muhammad Rasheed - lol F*ck no. You're just a hate troll on the Internet.
The current Great White Hope is Tom Aspinall.
@OGRickDiggler - Let that racism run through you.
Muhammad Rasheed - You don't know what "racism" means, and you seem okay with it.
You don't seem to realize that using words without knowing what they mean makes you look like a dumbass.
*************************************
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Great White Hopes, Thoughts & Racism." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


December 10, 2024
The Special Significance of 'Messiah' and 'Gospel'
Muhammad Rasheed -

orthodox Chasidic Jew from Israel;
historian and consultant
to the court in Jerusalem
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Sounds like a pharisee 😂
Muhammad Rasheed - The Pharisees rejected Jesus' messiahship, while the Muslims accept it. So, how is this particular Jew displaying Pharisee traits? The Muslims would never have schemed with the Roman government to try and have the Christ killed.
I think you people have replaced critical thinking with giggle emojis.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - What is the work of the Messiah? What was His purpose really? Lemme see how knowledgeable you are about the Messiah.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "What is the work of the Messiah?"
To preach the Gospel to the lost sheep of the House of Israel; to return them to the Path of their forefathers and instruct them in scripture & wisdom.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - So makes Him different from other prophets of that's the only work? And then every other prophets should be called messiahs.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - What do you even mean by "the Gospel"?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "So makes Him different from other prophets of that's the only work? And then every other prophets should be called messiahs."
Bingo. #BeliefInTheProphets
"Messiah" means anointed one/chosen one. They were ALL chosen, were they not? lol
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "What do you even mean by 'the Gospel?'"
The pure revelation God sent down to Jesus, that the latter preached to his people during his earthly lifetime.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - So then why Jesus only was called the Messiah?
If the Gospel means "pure revelation..." As you defined it, does that mean every other prophet's "revelation" is Gospel, even your prophet, i.e Gospel of Muhammad?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "So then why Jesus only was called the Messiah?"
Because he was chosen as the Jew's last chance to be saved by a prophet from among their own—he was specially chosen just for them with a special miracle to test their faith—he was cut off from their precious patriarchal bloodline. The Comforter came later as the universal prophet for the gentiles.
Ibn Malik wrote: "If the Gospel means 'pure revelation...' As you defined it"
I didn't say the word "Gospel" meant pure revelation, Mr. Strawman. You asked me what did I mean when I used the term. The Gospel is a portion of the pure revelation that God sent to all the prophets.
Muhammad Rasheed - You giggle a lot. Is this your fentanyl addiction?

Ibn Malik Al-Masih - How do you mean specially chosen, for special miracle, was other prophets not specifically chosen with special miracles?
What do you mean He was cut off from their precious patriarchal bloodline?
By your definition, bro, Gospel is a portion... Still saying same thing, back to the question, if you claim Muhammad had some portion of pure revelation does that mean the quran is a gospel?
What does Gospel mean?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "How do you mean specially chosen"
Because the Christ didn't have a father—he was purposely cut off from his patriarchal bloodline, which is important for the children of Israel for their monarchy traditions. Without a father, they would be force to chose their king because of his righteousness as the messenger of God.
Of course, they failed that test.
Ibn Malik wrote: "What do you mean He was cut off from their precious patriarchal bloodline?"
Jesus didn't have a father, he only had a matriarchal bloodline.
Ibn Malik wrote: "By your definition, bro, Gospel is a portion..."
Jesus still expected his followers to keep the Law of Moses, remember? His Gospel was only a supplement, not a replacement.
Ibn Malik wrote: "if you claim Muhammad had some portion of pure revelation does that mean the quran is a gospel?"
No. The Qur'an is a full and complete Book, like the Book of Moses before it. The Gospel is the limited message sent specifically to the lost sheep of the House of Israel.
Ibn Malik wrote: "What does Gospel mean?"
The actual definition is "good news."
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Are you afraid or angry at my giggle.
Focus on the question pls.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "Are you afraid"
Why would I be "afraid" of foolishness?
Ibn Malik wrote: "or angry at my giggle."
Why would I be "angry" at someone with zero knowledge who can't stop giggling like a lunatic?
Ibn Malik wrote: "Focus on the question pls."
You should focus on leaning knowledge and stop being a performative clown who giggles because he has no real argument to counter with.

Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Thanks for answering those questions. Focusing on the Gospel for now...
But are you saying the quran is not Gospel because it is a full and complete book? Then why is it called Gospel ie. Good news?
Muhammad Rasheed - Only a portion of the Qur'an represents the limited Good News portion of Jesus' message to the children of Israel.
Remember, Jesus said he actually had much more to teach, but it would have to come after him, brought by the Comforting Spirit of Truth. That's what the Qur'an represents—a fuller explanation of the Law of Moses.
The Qur'an has a Good News message for the Jews, but it also has a warning and messages for the Christians, for the believers, for the fence-sitters, and for the pagans. It also has a special Good News message for those who love doing Good and who know God is real in their hearts.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Remember Melchizedek didn't have a father too, does that mean he was a messiah too?
Cut off from the bloodline, without a father the will be forced...??? But the whole Jews in Jesus' time regarded Him as son of David. So what do you mean they failed the test?
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Ok, focus on those questions, ignore my giggles.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "Remember Melchizedek didn't have a father too, does that mean he was a messiah too?"
Messiah means "anointed one/chosen one." It has nothing to do with his patriarchal bloodline. All of the prophets are technically messiahs since God chose them all. Jesus' special title of messiah comes from him purposely being the Jews' last chance to have a messenger come to them from their own nation.
Ibn Malik wrote: "But the whole Jews in Jesus' time regarded Him as son of David."
Through whose bloodline? Joseph? Joseph was not his blood father.
Ibn Malik wrote: "So what do you mean they failed the test?"
According to your own religion, the Jews rejected Jesus and schemed to have him killed. Is that not a failure on their part?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "ignore my giggles"
Maybe you enjoy being a weirdo.

Muhammad Rasheed - You're all like that. You fill your knowledge void with giggle emojis. It's very strange. The less knowledge you have, the more giggle emojis you post. Every day.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - You must be angry about the giggling... Just ignore it pls.
Muhammad Rasheed - How can I ignore it when you're filling up my Notification box with it?

Ibn Malik Al-Masih - So are you saying Jesus was the messiah because He was a last prophet to the Jews?
Where'd you get that?
Joseph was not His father by blood, but Jesus is known to be from the family of line of David... Therefore regards to that it became their knowledge that Jesus was from royal family isn't it?Don't do Oliver twist bro, which test did the Jews failed exactly?
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "So are you saying Jesus was the messiah because He was a last prophet to the Jews?"
I'm saying he was singled out to have that particular title because it specifically meant he was the final chance the Jews had to have the return of the Prophetic Monarchy (David & Solomon).
Ibn Malik wrote: "Where'd you get that?"
I can read and comprehend what I read.
Ibn Malik wrote: "Joseph was not His father by blood, but Jesus is known to be from the family of line of David..."
From Mary's bloodline? The matriarchal side? Or from Joseph? If it's from Joseph, then it's not real.
Ibn Malik wrote: "Therefore regards to that it became their knowledge that Jesus was from royal family isn't it?"
Whose bloodline is Jesus connected to David from? lol
Ibn Malik wrote: "Don't do Oliver twist bro"
You're the one in new territory right now, and you're obviously not used to working your own brain.
Ibn Malik wrote: "which test did the Jews failed exactly?"
They were challenged—spiritually—to accept the messiah as their King even though he didn't have a father, with no patriarchal tie to the crown. They were forced to accept his kingship through the prophetic office and righteousness alone, which is what God wants humankind to focus on in the first place.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - Any true Christian who reads your answers will know that you are speaking total nonsense.
Muhammad Rasheed - The "true Christians" recognize that the messiah was only a human prophet, and not a divine entity. The true Christians are Muslims.
Ibn Malik Al-Masih - You really tried, many head knowledge and cunningly devised to look like you know what you are saying but actually you don't.
So I giggle to your ignorance even though you look brave. And I know you feel stupid as I giggled 🤣😂🤣.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ibn Malik wrote: "So I giggle to your ignorance"
What stands out is that you lack an intelligent counter-argument. All you have are impotent giggle emojis. What does that mean?
*************************************
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Special Significance of 'Messiah' and 'Gospel.'" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


December 7, 2024
Fake Race Activism to Save Fake Racial Representation
ComicsPriceGuide.com - hmmmm

Muhammad Rasheed - White creators make a blaxploitation-era "black character" and then pretends he's white. 🤨
That doesn't hit the way you imagined it did.
Christopher Corral - The only one that actually makes a difference would be Luke Cage. Because if he were white then it'd change everything. As for Hulk, Invisible Woman and The Thing though most of us wouldn't like the change had they been the originals I think all would be the same as they are now they'd just be known for those specific colors mentioned here.
Muhammad Rasheed - Christopher wrote: "Because if he were white then it'd change everything"
White creators make a fake "black character" —who isn't anchored to any lineage/heritage — and then arbitrarily make him white. What would that change exactly?
Brett Hampton - @Muhammad... What do you mean when you say "isn't anchored to any lineage/heritage"? I'm not challenging or arguing; just curious as to what your reasoning is.
Christopher Corral - @Muhammad... You serious? The character is black and was one of the few black super heroes at a time when black people had it more rough than today and so there was some relatability when Luke Cage's story took place in slum neighborhoods. The culture and personality also had to do with him being black. So if he had been white none of that would have been the same at all. What you want a white Luke Cage growing up in a black neighborhood beating up bad guys? That's just not relatable. Yes you have Spider-Man going into bad neighborhoods but the guy lived in a suburban neighborhood with his aunt so yeah definitely different.
Muhammad Rasheed - Brett wrote: "What do you mean when you say 'isn't anchored to any lineage/heritage?'"
Meaning, he comes across as unauthentic. Just a generic "black" figure designed to fill a quota so that a white-owned company can pretend to make some kind of phony social progress difference.
Muhammad Rasheed - Christopher wrote: "You serious?"
Yes.
Christopher wrote: "The character is black"
Is he though? What 'black' ethnic group does he belong to? The Black American descendants of slavery? Obama's black? Kamala's black? Miles Morales' black? As a Black man, how am I supposed to identify with a shallow, plastic "black" character created by a white man who didn't give a sh*t about those questions, and wouldn't be able to tell the difference?
Christopher wrote: "and was one of the few black super heroes at a time when black people"
...were pushed out of wealth-building media ownership and couldn't represent themselves. So white creators get to make money on fake "black" characters they publish to fill the void, and I get to hear shallow & weird justifications for this class systemic racism point by folks like you.

Real Systemic Racism by M. Rasheed
See Also:
A Fake Hero to Fake Save Us from Real Systemic Racism
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Fake Race Activism to Save Fake Racial Representation" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


December 1, 2024
Shenanigans Forever!
Ty Templeton -

Late to the party, I know: Just saw Black Panther 2, Wakanda Forever, and though I probably wouldn't have chosen to center the sequel around a dead character, if they're going to go that route to honour the late Chadwick Boseman, they probably couldn't have made a better film. Almost perfect in tone, action, character, narrative, and a delightful twist or two that actually got me. And I'm burying the lede: It's equally a Namor film, and wow, do they get so much of Namor bang-on. To be honest, the Marvel purist in me wished his name had really been Namor and that he'd been from a city actually called Atlantis, but other than those two minor quibbles, they get everything else about him RIGHT. And I dig the Mayan connection to the feathers in his legend. But the arrogance, the flying ankle wings, the green trunks, the rash anger. I was thrilled. And Riri Williams as Ironheart? Yes, please. All the characters had well considered story arcs, we weren't timid about our lesbian couple, and Shuri was oustanding in her grief and resolve to triumph over it. It might have run ten minutes too long and could have used a few lighter moments, but overall, it leapt up to being one of my top tier Marvel movies, up there with Winter Soldier and Iron Man (and Black Panther 1).
Muhammad Rasheed - Ty wrote: "we weren't timid about our lesbian couple"
They refused to recast Black Panther so they could replace him with a lesbian couple?
Oh.
Greg Kirkpatrick - @Muhammad... that’s all you got out of all of that? SMH.
Ty Templeton - @Muhammad... I think the word "so" is doing more heavy lifting than it can handle.
Muhammad Rasheed - @Greg... I've grown sensitive to the people with all the power and wealth deliberately taking swipes at my people and labeling it "progress."
Enough is enough.
Muhammad Rasheed - @Ty... I see similar shenanigans going on with the Blade project, and the suspicious reasons the script keeps being sent back for rewrites. Mass media is trying to saddle my people with the LGBT baggage in a textbook 'force teaming' effort.
Naturally, I disapprove.
David Branson - @Muhammad... How is having a lesbian couple “taking swipes” at anyone? Aren’t they also Black?
Ty Templeton - @Muhammad... Where we likely disagree is somewhat revealed in the use of pejorative phrases like "Saddle my people with the LGBT baggage" which assumes a priori that there is baggage to be saddled when dealing with queer representation. Tread carefully, btw: I got two LGBT kids. I tend to think of them as human first, and baggage as a distant second.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "How is having a lesbian couple 'taking swipes' at anyone? Aren’t they also Black?"
That's a great question. The answer is part of the dismantling of the Civil Rights Movement, which came to its end—not by Dr. King's Dream coming true—but by the assassination of our most effective leaders, and the infiltration and disbanding of our most effective organizations under Hoover's COINTELPRO program. After that, the infrastructure of the Civil Rights Movement was handed over to other identity groups (including white women feminism, LGBT and 'POC' immigrants), as the Black American liberation struggle was completely abandoned.
So now, pretending that helping these other groups is the same thing as "progress" for the long neglected Black American is the new thing.
Guide Encourages Activists to 'Force Team' Trans-Identified Males with Racial Minorities | 4W.PUB
Muhammad Rasheed - Ty wrote: "Tread carefully, btw: I got two LGBT kids."
And I have two Black American kids. Like you, I'm also tired of derogatory things said about them, and megacorporate scheming to show them in a poor light from multiple anti-Black American angles.
Ty Templeton - We certainly agree that corporate powers show black kids and culture in a poor light all day, and we're both tired of it. I'm not sure including gay characters in an all black cast (or mostly black) is showing anyone in a "poor light" though, and that's where you lose me. There might be a fundamental difference between us there that cannot be reconciled, as I see queer people as positive people. All the ones I know I clever, funny, loving people, baby.
Muhammad Rasheed - My issue is the corporate-political decision to pointedly not show antiracism activism for Black Americans in mass media product, but to replace it with LGBT activism with my Black image to promote it.
Regardless of whether there are actually homosexual Black Americans or not, the lgbt political movement is a white-founded and white-led political movement, that is using both the infrastructure of the Black American liberation freedom struggle and the image of the Black American to drive it. It's okay to bring up "racism" in a Jewish context, but to bring it up in the still unaddressed Black American context gets me attacked by white liberals as well as the conservative crowd.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Ty Templeton - I agree with most of what you said, we likely part at the edge. My belief is that LGBT activism is meant to include, not divide, you may see other motivators or facilitators involved. Your opinions are welcome here, so long as we don't use pejorative language -- you know the kind I mean.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ty wrote: "My belief is that LGBT activism is meant to include, not divide"
This is objectively not the case since the LGBT political movement is literally driven by our traditional political foes who first went out of their way to abuse government resources to dismantle the Black American freedom struggle with murder and espionage. There is not a single part of American history that does not reflect exploitation, plunder and division against my people by that one.
Muhammad Rasheed - And now he's trying to bully me into giving up my people's centuries old struggle to take up the banner of his causes (see: Whoopi's 2-week suspension for correctly pointing out that the Holocaust wasn't a "racism" issue since it was literally 'white-on-white' crime).
Ruby d'Anjou Smith - @Muhammad... "objectively"? This is utterly as subjective as can be. This is the same nonsense as Dave Chappelle's expressed belief that the LGBTQ activist movement is whyte, and that's why he was "allowed" to be transphobic.
And please don't end up doing another lengthy info dump as a response to it. Lots and lots of fancy words don't hide your dislike of the LGBTQ community.
Muhammad Rasheed - Ruby wrote: "'objectively?'"
Yes.
Ruby wrote: "This is utterly as subjective as can be."
No, it's actually based on the history of civil rights in the USA. You know it as "CRT" from behind your marxist propaganda shield.
Ruby wrote: "This is the same nonsense as Dave Chappelle's expressed belief that the LGBTQ activist movement is whyte"
Look up "Harvey Milk" and see the 'force teaming' article I posted above.
Ruby wrote: "and that's why he was 'allowed' to be transphobic."
He's not transphobic. You're being very emotional.
Ruby wrote: "And please don't end up doing another lengthy info dump as a response to it."
Don't respond to my comments. Save your emotional blurting for your peers.
Ruby wrote: "Lots and lots of fancy words don't hide your dislike of the LGBTQ community."
I don't have time to dislike the LGBT community; I'm too busy advocating for my own long-neglected group.
David Branson - There absolutely are an amazing number of gay Black people. My god what is this “regardless of whether there are…” business? What do you mean about the idea that the LGBT political movement is driven by your traditional political foes? Right-wingers?
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "There absolutely are an amazing number of gay Black people."
Objection: Relevancy.
David wrote: "My god what is this 'regardless of whether there are…' business?"
Politics is about using the system for the uplift of political identity groups. One particular identity group has dedicated itself to making sure my political identity group stays as a wealthless bottom caste in our own country, even though we were the ones whose free slave labor built her.
David wrote: "What do you mean about the idea that the LGBT political movement is driven by your traditional political foes? Right-wingers?"
The traditional political foes of the Black American former slave class are white people. Both the Right-wingers and the Left-wingers are guilty in this, playing a twisted, evil game of 'Good Cop/Bad Cop' throughout the centuries to keep my people disenfranchised and economically excluded, and ESPECIALLY here in the post-Civil Rights Era.
David Branson - We’re going to disagree about a bunch of this. Peace be with you.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "We’re going to disagree about a bunch of this"
What factual information do you hold that supports your opposing view?
Let me guess: You had a Black girlfriend or ex-wife or whatever, so that magically means that the white liberal hasn't also worked to keep my people disenfranchised and economically excluded?
#Paternalism #Gradualism

David Branson - Sorry, did I say I was going to continue to argue with you?
I’ve never had a girlfriend or wife of any color, unless you count this date I went on in junior high. My partner and I were together for seventeen years till he died of Covid, though.
I’m sorry to hear about any white liberals who have done what you describe.
But I’m not in the mood to continue arguing with you. Take care.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "I’ve never had a girlfriend or wife of any color"
I said "or whatever." 🙄
David wrote: "unless you count this date I went on in junior high"
Of course that counts. I'm confident if I hadn't brought it up first, you would have referenced it as the magic move that meant the white liberal is somehow not just as fiercely anti-Black American as your partisan counterparts. The anecdotal fallacy is your go-to move, after-all. You love it.
Was your late partner Black, by the way?
David Branson - What the hell are you talking about? I went on a date with a girl in junior high. She wasn’t Black. I’m gay. (My partner wasn’t Black either.) I have absolutely no idea what anecdotal fallacy you’re talking about. I didn’t bring one up. And I don’t particularly love them either. I don’t know you.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "I went on a date with a girl in junior high. She wasn’t Black."
Oh, then why did you even bring her up then? 🤨 If you're going to stay and trade, then you should at least pay attention. Geez.
David Branson - You introduced the idea that I had had a Black girlfriend or wife. My response was that I didn’t have a girlfriend or wife of ANY color, with the exception of going out on a date with a girl in junior high. Why would you say that I love anecdotal fallacies? We’ve never interacted before. You know nothing about me.
David Branson - And why would I mention going out on a date with a girl in junior high as a “magic move” that has anything whatsoever to do with racism??
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "You introduced the idea that I had had a Black girlfriend or wife."
That was the theme.
David wrote: "My response was that I didn’t have a girlfriend or wife of ANY color, with the exception of going out on a date with a girl in junior high"
Based on the established theme, that's why I thought the JHS girl was Black.
David wrote: "Why would you say that I love anecdotal fallacies?"
Stereotyping your team.
David wrote: "We’ve never interacted before. You know nothing about me."
So? Did you forget how stereotypes work? Your demographic perfected its usage, after-all.
David wrote: "And why would I mention going out on a date with a girl in junior high as a 'magic move' that has anything whatsoever to do with racism??"
Generally, the white liberal uses the anecdotal fallacy as part of his gaslighting technique. I started setting my watch by it a while ago.
Muhammad Rasheed - Despite your indignant protests, it's just a matter of time before you revert to type, assuming you stick around.
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Shenanigans Forever!" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


November 24, 2024
A Six-Year Old's Understanding
Breaking Brad - Calvin & Hobbes Lovers 😂🤣😂

Muhammad Rasheed - Calvin's excuse is that he's only six-years-old and can't be expected to have read the material.
Adults have no business sounding like a six-year-old when the answers to those basic-level questions are in the scriptures revealed for the purpose.
Claudio Guastavino - @Muhammad... are u fu**ing serious, are you???
Now, the truth is that EVEN a six years old can get a grasp of all the bull...
Think about it mate.
Muhammad Rasheed - @Claudio... I know the difference between what the religions actually teach versus the atheist mess blindly parroted by uninformed liberal types. Watterson's best stuff stayed away from the topics he knew nothing about.
John Wilcox - @Muhammad... Well, it's just growing up. At about 6 years old, I had such doubts about Santa Claus, Then maybe 7 or 8 years later, I questioned religion and realised that there is no God, except, like Santa Claus, as a construct of human thinking. Since then, for over half a century, I have been a happy atheist.
Muhammad Rasheed - John wrote: "and realised that there is no God"
Making the decision to reject God without doing any research to investigate the theist claims, isn't a "realization." Realization involves knowledge and insight. Atheists don't have that on this topic, based on their blind rejection connected to a false know-it-all mentality on the topic. And when they are among one another, they just reinforce the shallow, fake-deep tropes they carry.
Brian Mitchell - M. Rasheed wrote: "And then they are among one another, they just reinforce the tropes they carry."
You must see that this applies equally to those who attend religious ceremonies purely on the basis of social habit and/or cultural pressure. Being able to recite memorised scriptural passages does not amount to the kind of inward investigation you assume all atheists incapable of.
Muhammad Rasheed - Brian wrote: "You must see that this applies equally to those who attend religious ceremonies purely on the basis of social habit and/or cultural pressure."
Okay, there's a difference between the material being available but the people are too lazy to study what they profess to believe versus your clan who viciously reject the material while magically proclaiming what you refused to study to be a fiction with zero certain knowledge.
Brian wrote: "Being able to recite memorised scriptural passages does not amount to the kind of inward investigation you assume all atheists incapable of."
Who said that 'study' only consisted of rote memorization? Where is that written? I find it unreasonable that you expect me to take on the uninformed and uncritical opinions of my faith by hostile and biased outsiders as if it is fact just because you want to believe it's true. Why would I do that?
Larry Arsenault - @Muhammad Rasheed... If someone wants to believe in a religion and it helps them through their life while not harming others, I can support it. But Likewise if someone believes there is no "God" as a single being or thing, then i support that too with the same reservations. For me, no one can prove there is a God and it is impossible to disprove something that isn't there. Simply believing in a God because somebody wrote it in a book in ancient times is not proof. How come a God only appeared to the ancients and remember, most of those people were ignorant, superstitious. Today many people claim to "know" God, but many if not all of those people are imposters using religion to make money. My personal belief is we are learning to take the difficult step a child must take when becoming an adult - responsibility for their life. There are good words in the Bible, Buddhist texts and the Tao. The old testament is mainly about survival (I have not read the Koran). The main theme the originators from which religions are formed, basically seems to be "Do unto others as you woud have them do unto you." Simple words, but not easy to follow. But that is all the religion i need and just may be the religion we will adopt. Peace please.
Muhammad Rasheed - Larry wrote: "I can support it"
If you haven't taken the time to study the material to understand it, why do you think your endorsement from any angle would hold value? Why would assume your opinion of the subject is equally as valid as the subject matter expert's?
This is my problem with the atheist mind. You walk around with a bag of strawman effigies you've invented off-the-cuff that you typically pretend IS the religion, and then you actually expect the theists to sign off on your fabrications that you invented to mock my sacred belief system. It's a very weird approach to take with any subject objectively, so why do you think it's okay to perform this circus with organized religion?
Larry wrote: "(I have not read the Koran)"
Yet you are pseudo-lecturing at me about a book I am not bound to for reasons explicitly stated in the Qur'an. You're wasting my time with this rant that holds no insights or value to me.
Muhammad Rasheed - It's not okay to walk around with an uninformed 6-year-old's level of understanding of a complex subject as an adult while trying to argue it like you actually know something.
Somehow you all have convinced yourselves that this behavior is intelligent. The comic strip above demonstrates that Watterson is willfully ignorant about the topic and thinks that his ignorance is somehow a badge of honor. Then you all high-fived it in support, which outs you also as ignorant.
Please note that the knowledge is actually available for study. It's not locked in a booby-trapped cave in a lost Middle Eastern city, or whatever.
Case Edwards - @Muhammad... First of all it’s a great comic strip, not an excuse for you to preach. I’ve read your ridiculous book cover to cover and studied many of the other religions as well. I have an informed opinion and used to simply disagree with people like you. The smug self righteousness of your ilk has led me to actively despise your kind, so well done. The only reason for me to want a god to exist is the hope it’s keeping hell hot for you. Sad that’s not the case.
Muhammad Rasheed - Case wrote: "First of all it’s a great comic strip"
The Calvin and Hobbes strip in general is objectively great, sure. This one specifically is ignorant trash.
Case wrote: "not an excuse for you to preach"
The strip itself is preaching ignorant foolishness in a fake-deep package. Typical of the atheist.
Case wrote: "I’ve read your ridiculous book cover to cover and studied many of the other religions as well"
That's a lie, also typical of the atheist. [“The great outline of research comes to light best in dialog.” ~Otto Toeplitz]
Case wrote: "I have an informed opinion"
Clearly not. You have a triggered opinion.
Case wrote: "The smug self righteousness of your ilk has led me to actively despise your kind"
lol The talking without a single point of informed knowledge about the subject while trying to influence public opinion from a red commie tactic has led me to despise your kind. I guess that makes us even, wot?
Case wrote: "The only reason for me to want a god to exist"
Holy crap, who cares what you think? Just take the hellfire you've chosen and try to keep all your screaming to a moderate volume.
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Six-Year Old's Understanding." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


November 14, 2024
Fake Proselytizing of the Red Agent
Kiska Shigemura -

David Goliath - Bullshit! That is not what it says or what it means. Those who work should enjoy the fruits of their labor and workers should have a say in how the work gets done.
Muhammad Rasheed -

David Goliath - @Muhammad... That quote literally describes America and especially Wall Street today. A system that enshrines the 1%, a class that cannot be topped by ordinary people who buys elections pouring in billions. A class of people that fills the airwaves with lies about how awesome everything is even as the streets and schools crumble? That doesn't sound like anything else to you?
Muhammad Rasheed - @David... As long as the capitalist structure remains, there's always a chance that they can lose their spot. That's the part they hate ("Competition is a sin!" ~J.D. Rockefeller) and why they scheme to replace the entire system with the communist model to permanently secure their status.
David Goliath - Take a good look around what competition? We have less market competition NOW than we had in the 80s and that's why things are more expensive. Rockefeller hated competition because he lost profits. Communism doesn't mean you don't have a car or a house ot means that the company that built the car is owned and operated by the people who worked there. In capatalism today we just replaced kings and lords with CEOs and lords with shareholders.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "take a good look around what competition?"
We're in the Second Gilded Age. The monopolists have clearly won. Their next goal is to formally flip the nation's economic structure over to communism and synch in their status forever...
...or at least until the Big War, or whatever.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "Communism doesn't mean you don't have a car or a house ot means that the company that built the car is owned and operated by the people who worked there"
I have zero interest in the cold definition as printed on the pamphlet tracts, only in how it actually functioned in real life and who invented it and who would benefit from it.
Communism is end state crony-corporatism and is the ultimate goal of the billionaire monopolists.
David Goliath - If you don't have any interest in it then call it something else. My brother in Christ the end stage of capitalism is fascism. Marx thought that the capitalistic system would inevitably destroy itself. The oppressed workers would become alienated and ultimately overthrow the owners to take control of the means of production themselves, ushering in a classless society.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "if you don't have any interest in it then call it something else."
No need. There's half a million terms for it. The one I used works well enough.
David wrote: "My brother in Christ"
Does my name give the impression I am a Christian? Curious.
David wrote: "the end stage of capitalism is fascism"
More cold pamphlet proselytizing. That means nothing to me. At all. You may as well be earnestly trying to explain why an elephant-headed idol is blue.
David Goliath - Are you a worker? That's all that matters.
Muhammad Rasheed - Truth matters.
Muhammad Rasheed - David wrote: "are you a worker? That's all that matters."
lol That's what it sounds like when colluding cliques of fiends plan to manipulate the working class to maintain a self-interested caste system they control.
No, thanks, commie.
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Fake Proselytizing of the Red Agent." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________SUBSCRIBE and receive a FREE! Weapon of the People eBook by M. Rasheed!


May 9, 2024
[A TELEPLAY] ADOS Man vs White Feminist

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "[A TELEPLAY] ADOS Man vs White Feminist." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 2024. [cartoon pending] Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.
CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:
M. Rasheed on YouTube!
M. Rasheed on BitChute!
*************************************
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - Why do men?
Muhammad Rasheed - Because who else...? You? A WOMAN???
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!
Stop.
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - Considering most of societywas matriarchal yes me. A woman.
Muhammad Rasheed - Psh!
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) – I mean. Weren't you broughtinto the world by a woman? Isn't that something men can't do? Haven't younoticed historically when a woman is in power and loves her country, thateverything does better under her leadership? Tomatoes at you sir 🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "I mean. Weren't youbrought into the world by a woman?"
I was brought into the world by God who used the woman asHis portal.
CHASTIDY: "Isn't that something men can't do?"
OBJECTION! - Relevancy.
CHASTIDY: "Haven't you noticed historically when awoman is in power and loves her country, that everything does better under herleadership?"
lol No.
I'm of the American Descendants of Slavery group.
CHASTIDY: "Tomatoes at you sir 🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅"
WHAT A WOMANLY THING TO DO!
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - And I've got Native Americanblood? What does race have to do with it?
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "And I've got NativeAmerican blood?"
Here:
Paying to Play Indian: The Dawes Rolls and the Legacy of $5 Indians
CHASTIDY: "What does race have to do with it?"
With Native Americans? Literally nothing. Here:
Native Americans Tell Warren to Renounce Ancestry Claim After DNA Test
Ahead of her 2020 campaign launch, Warren took a much-criticized DNA test to prove a family story that she had Native American ancestry and stymie Trump's attacks. After an ensuing uproar, and criticism from some Native Americans, Warren contacted the Cherokee Nation to apologize, the Intercept reported.
The new letter had been in the works for about three months, Pierce told Insider. He insisted that the timing was not politically motivated, but acknowledged that "the context of her seeking the Democratic nomination presents us with an opportunity to try to pressure her."
The letter states that "while the average American thinks of Native Americans as a racial category, we are actually a political group. Our rights are based on citizenship in sovereign Nations and those Nations' treaty relationship to the United States."
But with the feminism thing, there is a nefariousconnection:

Muhammad Rasheed - In all seriousness, you may wish toadjust your rhetoric when discussing the matter with the Woke among theAmerican Descendants of Slavery, who are the traditional victims of white womenwhile they engage in their domestic power struggles with white men.
We may now return to the playful banter...
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - I did not ever buy a slave.Your issue is NOT with me. It is with the person who originally started sellingslaves. And those who bought them then.
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "I did not ever buy aslave."
Psh. You own stock in one of the several publicly-traded for-profit prisons. #StopTheCap
CHASTIDY: "Your issue is NOT with me."
Sure, it is. U.S. white people are the ones deliberately keeping my ethnicgroup in an artificially impoverished state. You shoot down all of our effortsto fix the issue, and then force-team your own pet political agendas onto mine.lol
CHASTIDY: "It is with the person who originally startedselling slaves. And those who bought them then.”
Let me guess, you're going to try to pretend the PortugueseAngolan Anthony Johnson actually invented slavery in America or somethingsimilar? lol Try it so I can show you something. :)
CHASTIDY: "And those who bought them then.”
Those who bought them, then passed the amassed wealth down to you, as yourgenerations protect that system at my expense, being the most relevant aspectsof history for our purposes, yes?
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - Also, I stand up for anyone Isee being mistreated. That being said. This isn't a race conversation. We aswhite women are actually paid less than a black man. The only man who makesless than a white woman is a Hispanic man. And NATIVE AMERICAN WOMEN. Are paidthe least of all. Just by BEING a man you have more privilege than a woman. Youdon't have to agree but that just facts.
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - You're just mad because I saida WOMAN can do just as much IF NOT MORE. Damn. Keep giving me engagement tho!!!
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - I don't own stock? I'm 24! Idkwhy you're getting mad at ME. I didn't do anything to you. I live in anIMPOVERISHED STATE, they're keeping ALL OF THE WORKING CLASS DOWN. Why can'tyou see it's not a race issue? Not everything is about race
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) – IM LITERALLY POOR!!! Who doyou think I am??? I'm laughing! Like IM SO POOR!!!!
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) - Also just an FYI my mother'sside of the family didn't come here until her mother came over from Irelanddog. On my dad's side were French Jewish and Native American. So idk. Maybestop talking?
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "Also, I stand up foranyone I see being mistreated."
I'm talking about at the systemic level here. It's easy todo contrived, posed "charity" for the 'Gram.
CHASTIDY: "That being said. This isn't a raceconversation."
lol This is the USA—literally EVERYTHING remains a raceconversation until ADOS are made whole. You can't kick that can down the roadforever.
CHASTIDY: "We as white women are actually paid lessthan a black man."
You're being silly. White Americans control 90% of the $136trillion in national household wealth, as ADOS control less than 6% of it. Also,MOST of the homeless unemployed are ADOS people, even as you all bring overmore and more "migrants" to push us out of American life altogether.
CHASTIDY: "The only man who makes less than a whitewoman is a Hispanic man."
"Hispanic" men are white people. They literallyhelped write the jim crow laws that oppressed my people.
CHASTIDY: "And NATIVE AMERICAN WOMEN."
Are just more white people playing a long-con so they candouble-dip as both the high-caste of the nation's socio-economic structurewhile they pretend to be a protected minority.
CHASTIDY: "Are paid the least of all."
Sure, while they continue to collect billions in governmentassistance and reparations checks.
CHASTIDY: "Just by BEING a man you have more privilegethan a woman."
lol White women control half of the 90% of the nation'snational household wealth while my people are functionally wealthless in ourown country.
CHASTIDY: "You don't have to agree but that justfacts."
You don't know what a "fact" means.
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "You're just mad because Isaid a WOMAN"
Lower your voice before I get mad, toots.
CHASTIDY: "can do just as much IF NOT MORE."
Actually, I missed that part. I came in at the "Why do men?" mark.
CHASTIDY: "Damn."
No cursing in the house. It's not lady-like.
CHASTIDY: "Keep giving me engagement tho!!!"
Bet. lol
Muhammad Rasheed - CHASTIDY: "IM LITERALLYPOOR!!!"
Lower your voice before you catch the back of my hand. Even though I'm a Man, Idon't have limitless patience. Have a care.
CHASTIDY: "Who do you think I am???"
A white people. Your version of "poor" is not the same as my group's.You weren't legally being forced into an artificial impoverished state forcenturies.
CHASTIDY: "I'm laughing!"
Just like a broad. smh
CHASTIDY: "Like IM SO POOR!!!!"
Your "poor" isn't my poor (see: Flint MI and Jackson MS).
Muhammad Rasheed – CHASTIDY: "Also just an FYI mymother's side of the family didn't come here until her mother came over fromIreland dog."
Oh, good. Watch this:
Black people suffer the most racism in Ireland, report finds | Irish Times

CHASTIDY: "On my dad's side were French Jewish"
The Jews were heavily complicit in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, the Americanchattel slave institution at all levels, in the jim crow schemes, and they weremost complicit in exploiting my group with force-teaming grifts (see: The Black& Jewish Alliance).
CHASTIDY: "and Native American."
That again? Here:
Paying to Play Indian: The Dawes Rolls and the Legacy of $5 Indians
CHASTIDY: "So idk. Maybe stop talking?"
You're stepping out of line, sweetheart. I suggest you dial it back.
Chastidy (@chastidy_leeann) – M. Rasheed wrote: “Lower yourvoice before you catch the back of my hand. Even though I'm a Man, I don't havelimitless patience. Have a care.”
God damn. Okay. Yes. Threaten to backhand me. Fuck off
Muhammad Rasheed - Sounds like you like it.
Or you just don't listen. 🤔
*************** Chastidy Blocked Me ***************