Muhammad Rasheed's Blog, page 2

Bitter Communist Sleeper Agent Breaks Cover!

[original cartoon pending]
CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Bitter Communist Sleeper Agent Breaks Cover!" Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Freeman Grey - [MEME] Leaving religion doesn't mean you're lost, rather it implies you choose courage over conformity.

Muhammad Rasheed - All atheists sound the same and post the same 11 memes. There's definitely conformity there. The "free thinker" label they cooked up is the most hilariously ironic self-burn in all of fake-philosophy.

Freeman Grey - @Muhammad... explain brother. Atheists that I know walk their own path and aren't trapped in the psychological, so called spiritual or cultural boxes the religious folks are. We embrace more diversity and see the big picture behind all of religion. Control. It's more pervasive than any political system and pimps the poor, peddles misinformation, and those wanting to follow failed traditions of their ancestors. The world in my opinion would be so much better and advanced without barbaric religiously institutions. Especially the Christian ones.

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "explain brother."

Under scientific posts they always post the same rhetoric, pretending they champion scientific discovery while trying to force their poor understanding of science discovery into their little boxes. Under religious posts, they always post the same strawman fallacies and act like they are mic drops, while avoiding the actual arguments theists put forward. They always copy/paste philosophical tripe from other famous atheists and pretend that posting them makes them "walk their own path."

Freeman wrote: "Atheists that I know walk their own path"

Do they? At this point, I don't even think y'all know what that means.

Freeman wrote: "and aren't trapped in the psychological"

You're trapped in a pseudo-philosophical "free thinker" La-La Land of your own invention that is an adolescent, shallow rebellion against tradition.

Freeman wrote: "so called spiritual"

You've never studied it. You just reject it because you don't like rules or boundaries or whatever.

Freeman wrote: "or cultural boxes the religious folks are."

lol That just means you want to have your own separate culture based on theft and hedonism and pandemic levels of STDs.

Freeman wrote: "We embrace more diversity"

You hide your lust for degeneracy behind "diversity" rhetoric.

Freeman wrote: "and see the big picture behind all of religion."

Meanwhile, no one strawmans more than atheists talking about religion. You all have no idea what you are talking about and are frequently too lazy to just look up the basics.

Freeman wrote: "Control."

The point of civilization is to control the sociopathic degenerates among us. If you rebel against societal controls, what does that say about you?

Freeman wrote: "It's more pervasive than any political system"

You sound like you're reading off an ignorant atheist pamphlet. Show your work if ye are truthful. Do you have any facts to back this claim, or is this a tenet of your blind faith atheist religion that I reject because there's literally nothing supporting it?

Freeman wrote: "and pimps the poor"

Corporate pimps the poor. And corporate hates religion just as much as you do. And so do the communists for that matter.

Freeman wrote: "peddles misinformation"

That's literally what you're doing in this sentence.

Freeman wrote: "and those wanting to follow failed traditions of their ancestors."

Remember the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the USSR? What's a bigger symbol of 'failed tradition' than the biggest official supporter of atheism falling on its head?

Freeman wrote: "The world in my opinion"

Your opinion is composed of a folio of silly memes.

Freeman wrote: "would be so much better and advanced without barbaric religiously institutions. Especially the Christian ones."

The theists—both Christians and Muslims—led all of the modern milestones in science discovery over the last, so what are you going on about? Everything the atheist scientists assumed about the material universe during the 20th century turned out to be false based on the findings around the cosmic microwave background/relic radiation, so you people can't pretend to have a monopoly on thought, reason and science. You're just a bunch of close-minded kids having a tantrum because you want your communist orgies.

Freeman Grey - You cook up lovely word salads, but the tastes still remains the same old thing. Religion is not good. And I'm not aware of an atheist pamphlet 😆. You putting all your eggs in a basket where you hope your reward happens after death 😆 Religious folk are the most degenerate people on earth. Also I don't paste and copy other atheists stuff. I use my own brain and speak from it 😆 you sound illogical like usual ADOS man. Religion will continue to hamper mankind's potential. Nothing I said was meant to be a mic drop. Your words stated here definitely weren't word drops. I still remember battling it out with you on the old herotalk forum. You come off as self righteous simp afraid to expand your scientific perspective. And I went to one of the best STEM highschools in my state as a youth. I know a lot about science. I Wonder how much does ADOSman actually know about religion. In particular Islam which is all paste and copy rhetorical fantasy and BS from a shady figure you call Muhammad. Let me guess, you were named after him ? 😆 Religion and conformity < Science and nonconformity

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "You cook up lovely word salads"

That's what people say when their vocabulary is weak and they don't know sh*t.

Atheists are dumb as f*ck.

Muhammad Rasheed - Freeman wrote: "Religion is not good"

Based on what? Your desire to frolic on Epstein Island?

Freeman wrote: "Religious folk are the most degenerate people on earth"

Said the guy who literally wants to frolic on Epstein Island guilt-free.

Freeman wrote: "Also I don't paste and copy other atheists stuff."

And you're also a bald-faced liar. Like I can't see your never-ending stream of copy/pasted bullsh*t. You're famous for it even among atheists.

Freeman wrote: "I use my own brain"

I'll assume you're talking about these giggle emojis, because you're dumb as f*ck. Not once have you ever backed up your bullsh*t with facts, reason, logic. I don't think atheists know how to.

Freeman wrote: "you sound illogical like usual ADOS man"

You're an African. Ah. No wonder.

Freeman wrote: "Religion will continue to hamper mankind's potential"

All of the major modern scientific milestones were developed by theists (Isaac Newton? Hello?) and you can't prove a single one of your ignorant-assed points. Just dumb.

Freeman wrote: "I still remember battling it out with you on the old herotalk forum."

That means I kicked your worthless ass and you're still butthurt over it. Tracking.

Freeman wrote: "You come off as self righteous simp"

I'm better than you. Hurts, doesn't it?

Freeman wrote: "afraid to expand your scientific perspective."

Please don't pretend like you know anything about science, or I'd just have to f*ck you up again like I did on Herotalk.

Freeman wrote: "And I went to one of the best STEM highschools in my state as a youth"

And you either dropped out because it was too hard, or you are lying again.

Freeman wrote: "I know a lot about science"

Clearly not.

Freeman wrote: "In particular Islam which is all paste and copy rhetorical fantasy and BS from a shady figure you call Muhammad."

We both know you don't know anything about Islam and its prophet, but please go there so I can embarrass your punk ass in front of all your little friends.

Freeman wrote: "Let me guess, you were named after him ? 😆"

I was named after my dad, but I like how your demonstration of "non-conformity" shows you being a stereotype propagandist. smh

Freeman Grey - @Richard Diamond... you see this ??

Richard Diamond - @Freeman... I'm seeing this fuckery. This dude pees sitting down.

Richard Diamond - @Muhammad... nigga. You on my list too for this fuckery.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Richard...

What.

In the ENTIRE f*ck.

Is THIS?

Muhammad Rasheed - You look like you were 3D printed by Rose O'Neill.

Richard Diamond - Thanks for proving to the universe and Allah you are a fucking idiot.

Muhammad Rasheed - Do you believe this is what 'Allah' looks like in your world?

You do, don't you?

Richard Diamond - I have a better comeback, but your mom got dibs on my come in her throat

Richard Diamond - Do you pee like a bitch?

Muhammad Rasheed - Oh, wait. That's the VP in your profile pic. lol

Sorry, I thought that worthless ghoul was you based on the vulgar uncouth of your regular discourse. I'll assume you're a piece-of-sh*t atheist, too, since vulgar uncouth is literally all you have to support your worldview?

Richard Diamond - You ignorant pork rind, HOW the everloving fuck does cussing entail my WORLDVIEW? Fuckdongles like you get a subscription to grammarly and now you think you have mastered multi syllable words.

Muhammad Rasheed - It encompasses your entire worldview because when given the opportunity to prove me wrong, it's literally all you had.

And it's still all you have. You armchair Facebook atheists are universally dumb as f*ck.

Richard Diamond - My worldview is to fuck with small dicked religious assholes that think their invisible skydaddy has any FUCKING POWER OVER MY WORLD VIEW.

My worldview is to eat whatever food I want without some ghost being upset.

My worldview is to put my penis in any consenting adult I choose regardless of gender OR sex. YES those are TECHNICALLY different.... the BEST kind of different.

At one pm on Friday I am not OBLIGATED to sit on the floor and listen to some asshole yap about Ibliss and his demon horde, hiding in TVs and other stupid shit instead of being a 90ft kaiju.

You don't want this smoke . You'll need to take another Shahada because you gonna get proverbially pegged.

Muhammad Rasheed - You don't have any "smoke," son. You've just confirmed that you—just like everyone else in your silly armchair atheist clan—have not a single fact to back your emotion-fueled claims. You're just vulgar & uncouth. That's all you have, and it doesn't make you smart nor valuable. You're just a fool.

Richard Diamond - Bitch please. You think atheists are a solitary group, therefore I'm technically smarter than you. You head is so far up your bitch ass that you practically feel NOT being religious is being in a religion. Do you have 4 wives? I think THATS MORALLY UNCOUTH. Tell Mr, and everyone here your feelings towards Jews, especially the ones unaliving Palestinians. Drop the facade and show me your jihad face. How old will your wives be? You need to train them young to ensure she's pure, right?

Muhammad Rasheed - Richard wrote: "Bitch please."

Literally all you have to support your position is vulgarity and uncouth. That's what you've embraced as your worldview. You're a willfully ignorant, vulgar uncouth person, who somehow thinks his expression of vulgar uncouth is a trait of nobility or whatever.

Richard wrote: "You think atheists are a solitary group"

lol Social media armchair atheists are definitely a solitary group. You all act and post the exact same way, you all have a proud NOTHING to back your poorly-thought out, often blindly copy/pasted claims, and you all function as a moronic hive mind.

Richard wrote: "therefore I'm technically smarter than you"

awww... look at the stupid atheist think it's performing logic. #adorbs

Richard wrote: "You head is so far up your bitch ass that you practically feel NOT being religious is being in a religion"

Every single atheist you know follows tenets of faith that make up your atheist worldview. It definitely functions as a religious belief system. The difference is that modern science actually supports the major claims of my religion, while a proud nothing at all supports yours.

Richard wrote: "Do you have 4 wives?"

Why would I? It doesn't even make sense that you're asking me that considering you don't know anything at all about the religion of Islam outside of gossip and rumors you picked up here-n-there from half-assed paying attention to casual political rhetoric. Why step over the main core parts of what makes Islam what it is to ask me about something that has nothing at all to do with the Five Pillars or the Articles of Faith that actually make the religion? Do you think randomly asking me something you don't understand at all, that you picked up in the streets from you don't even know where, somehow magically makes you smart?

Richard wrote: "I think THATS MORALLY UNCOUTH."

Who cares what you think about a topic you're too lazy to study?

Richard wrote: "Tell Mr, and everyone here your feelings towards Jews, especially the ones unaliving Palestinians."

What does that have to do with the topic? Can you even explain what you're trying to say in straight talk, or do you stop at shallowly throwing stuff against the wall to see what gets a rise out of me because you lack any actual tools of discourse as an uncouth fool?

Richard wrote: "Drop the facade"

How would you be able to discern a Muslim from a facade-wearing Muslim? What measure would you use?

Richard wrote: "and show me your jihad face."

You picked up that word in the streets during the 9/11 war machine, huh? lol

Jim Kelly - @Freeman... What is ADOS?

Muhammad Rasheed - @Jim... It's the American Descendants of Slavery ethnic group name ("Black Americans") used by the political advocacy group. This ass clown decided to mix my critique of ineffectual atheism philosophy with the political advocacy group because atheists are degenerate dumbasses, and this one in particular is a hostile African immigrant who hates my people.

Jim Kelly - Thank ypu. I did not know that. You think Freeman Grey hates ADOS?

Muhammad Rasheed - There's literally no reason to disparage ADOS in a theist-vs-atheist argument. He's only bringing it up out of resentment.

Jim Kelly - If you are only arguing about Theology, then yes. But don't you think that he is only trolling?

Muhammad Rasheed - At first I did, until he mentioned that he was carrying around some old baggage from the past and was resentful about it.

Now I understand fully.

Jim Kelly - So, it is personal with hin. He seems to be spending too much time shitposting and reposting, you think he is making money from it in some way?

Muhammad Rasheed - I do have another FB Friend who makes money regularly posting memes in a scheduled cycle. He may be signed up in that or a similar program.

See Also:  

The Slut Loophole by M. Rasheed

Artifacts of the Black Superheroes by M. Rasheed

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Flimsy Rhetoric of the Modern Hate Monger

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Flimsy Rhetoric of the Modern Hate Monger." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

John Kraft - Still true.

John Kraft - [FB Memory - 4 Years Ago] I have often wondered about why Whites are racists, and no other race is......

Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this?

There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.

And then there are just Americans.. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.

You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'... And that's OK..

You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you....

So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.

You have Black History Month.

You have Cesar Chavez Day.

You have Yom Hashoah.

You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.

You have the NAACP.

You have BET....

If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists.

If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.

If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.

If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.

Wonder who pays for that??

A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.

There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US .

Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.

If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.

But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

You rob us, car jack us, and shoot at us.

But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

I am proud...... But you call me a racist.

Why is it that only whites can be racists??

That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country.

We won't stand up for ourselves!

BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

It's not a crime YET.... But getting very close!

Copied from a friend

Muhammad Rasheed - There's nothing about this rant that's true. You all literally ignore the history of U.S. race relations to conjure a false narrative so you can pretend to be something other than you've demonstrated.

You are the racist because 1.) it was your idea to permanently delegate the chattel bondsman class to American Black people by law, 2.) you refused to heed the abolitionists and free the bondsman as the right thing to do because of your lusts, and 3.) you did everything in your power to prevent the former slave class from being competitive equals in the open free markets, to the point of an epidemic of domestic terror.

Muhammad Rasheed - John posted: "That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country"

Name one right that you lost, please.

John Kraft - @Muhammad... Guess I should have edited it to privilege since most of what people think of rights aren't. The only right anyone has is the right to die but some reason suicide is illegal. Anything else is a privilege given or supported by someone stronger. Go into the woods or many other countries and claim rights and you won't get shit unless you force it.

Muhammad Rasheed - John wrote: "Guess I should have edited it to privilege since most of what people think of rights aren't."

So, the whole "we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country" emotional hate troll rhetoric was a complete lie. Tracking.

John Kraft - Yes there were many democrats back then and many of them have the same views now. Back then Lincoln wanted to send all the blacks back and start over but that didn't work out. Many Chinese, Irish, and "indentured servants" had a miserable time in the United States. It was almost as bad as conditions during Genghis Khan or even in Africa with tribal warfare.

Or if you want to look at it from a humanitarian point of view. Which was worse slavery or death? The tribes were busy killing each other until they realized the dumb whites would give them money to not kill each other. Some of the ones sold even managed to not die and ended up with better conditions than tribal warfare.

Muhammad Rasheed - John wrote: "Yes there were many democrats back then and many of them have the same views now."

This is not a partisan issue, it's a U.S. race relations issue between white people versus the American descendants of slavery. Both Democratic Party whites and Republican Party whites hate, resent and exploit my people.

John wrote: "Back then Lincoln wanted to send all the blacks back and start over but that didn't work out."

Work me for my free labor for 230-years and then send me "back" to the alien land that sold me to the Dutch East India Company in the first place. Of course it didn't work out; the plan was poorly thought out and genuinely stupid.

John wrote: "Many Chinese, Irish, and 'indentured servants' had a miserable time in the United States."

U.S. immigration was weaponized against the former slave class to prevent us from having a labor monopoly. Whites favored the immigrant class over us, no matter how badly you try to claim they were treated. You certainly don't treat any of them like a low class citizen now, do you? Stop trying to make me feel sympathy for a people you brought over specifically to be my rivals and co-enemies.

John wrote: "It was almost as bad as conditions during Genghis Khan or even in Africa with tribal warfare."

What does any of that have to do with the hypocrisy of U.S. race relations in "the land of the free?" You're always trying to conjure fake excuses to justify being an evil d*ck.

John wrote: "Or if you want to look at it from a humanitarian point of view."

You're trying to retcon history in your favor while pretending to be a champion of humanitarianism?

John wrote: "Which was worse slavery or death? The tribes were busy killing each other..."

I'm not interested in what you think life in Africa was like as you try to use the fake rhetoric to justify your own evils. We're talking about American life, American laws, American culture and American traditions. A foreign people from 400-years-ago have zero bearing on what our two peoples do TODAY in OUR COUNTRY.

The tribes hated and killed and enslaved each other in Old Europe, too, so should I bring that up to the white conservatives who stormed the Capitol Bldg? Stop being ridiculous.

See Also: The Right Tool for the Job by M. Rasheed

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

A Race Battle Under the Cross

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Race Battle Under the Cross." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE  below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Q: What are some movie mistakes that only made them better?

Wairia - In the film Passion of the Christ, James Caviezel, the lead actor who portrayed Jesus Christ, recently revealed a painful behind-the-scenes mistake that ended up in the final cut of the movie.

In an exclusive interview with Fox, James Caviezel told Fox News contributor and host Raymond about a serious injury he sustained while filming the scene of Jesus' walk through the streets of Jerusalem's Old City, the path that Jesus took to his crucifixion. In the scene, Caviezel was carrying a heavy wooden cross, as Jesus would have, but he fell, and the cross came down hard on top of him.

"As I went down, the cross... it actually struck my head and buried my head in the sand. And I bit through my tongue," he said, "Now, in the tape, you'll see streams of blood coming down from my lip. That's actually my own blood.”

Despite the blistering pain on his shoulder, he worked through the pain and delivered his lines to actress Maia Morgenstern, who played the Virgin Mary.

"At this time, the shoulder is out and I was trying everything I had to get my arm over [the cross]," he continued, "And it looks like it's the most extraordinary take because it looks like I'm cherishing our cross, which is our faith, and hugging it but in the most beautiful way.

"It wasn't beautiful to me," he acknowledged with a laugh, "because it hurt like hell... my AC joint had been torn."

Seems like playing Jesus comes at a cost of personal suffering.

Muhammad Rasheed - Fortunately the actor had millions of dollars at his disposal to throw at a simple medical procedure, so it’s all good. Praise God.

Michael Fairgate - My friend who is now a priest, played a Jesus stunt double in our Passion Play. He was actually whipped on his back and legs by two Roman guards who couldn’t hear him yelling to stop because of the loud music. He felt like the real Jesus.

Muhammad Rasheed - Is your friend black and the two ‘Roman’ actors white? If so, then I call bs on them not being able to hear him. lol

David Nelson - Why do you have to bring race into everything?

Muhammad Rasheed - It was already built into everything. That’s literally the system that your identity group setup.

Mark Fisher - This graphic is a bunch of headlines without any substance or references 🤔 🙄 (much like most news media today). However, as a kid I remember 2 issues that really effected black/African American people. One was the attempt at bussing kids to other schools in the area to try to make education more ‘fair ‘ , and the other was how renters illegally discriminated against minorities (mainly African American) in the rental market and realtors/banks/neighbors in the home market. No one wanted ‘them’ in their neighborhood. Reality is strewn with problems to solve without stoking the fire on made up crap. Help, follow, lead, or get out of the way.

Muhammad Rasheed - Mark wrote: “This graphic is a bunch of headlines without any substance or references 🤔 🙄”

It’s actually a graphic collage I made myself from screenshots of the article titles.

Mark wrote: “the attempt at bussing kids to other schools in the area to try to make education more ‘fair‘”

After the Brown v. Board of Education case, the 1954 Supreme Court determined that “separate but equal” was a nonsensical concept based on the history of U.S. race relations, and ruled that the only way the long abused American descendants of slavery could have equal quality education as whites, was to attend the same schools alongside whites. Whites responded by refusing to comply to social progress, and decided they liked being unfair and demonic to the former slave class. For those who ever wondered at the origin of the anti-Black “low IQ” slur, it’s because whites are well aware that they refused compliance with the landmark 1954 SCOTUS decision and deliberately withhold quality education from the Black American (ADOS) community and mock us for it. #EvilInTheLand

Mark wrote: “and the other was how renters illegally discriminated against minorities (mainly African American) in the rental market and realtors/banks/neighbors in the home market.”

That info is included within my collage graphic that you dismissed.

Mark wrote: “Reality is strewn with problems to solve without stoking the fire on made up crap”

There is no “made up crap” in my collage. You’re just evil and only care about your own group at the expense of mine as you have for the last 400+ years. Shame on you.

Mark Fisher - Judge not lest you be judged by the same standard. I never said which side of the argument was right. Your judgements about me and my group are purely based on ignorance. So go away 🧌 troll.

Muhammad Rasheed - Mark wrote: “Judge not lest you be judged by the same standard.”

Matthew 7:1-5 advises against condemning others, particularly when one's own flaws are greater. I will gladly pit my flaws against yours as a representative of the diabolical fiend of legend ANY DAY. lol

Mark wrote: “I never said which side of the argument was right.”

Truth, facts, logic & reason determine which side of an argument is objectively right. Who asked you anything? Obviously, you're the proud enemy of truth.

Mark wrote: “Your judgements about me and my group are…”

…are supported by the facts of history which you blindly dismissed like a coward in your very first sentence in this thread.

Mark wrote: “So go away 🧌 troll.”

Said the guy trolling under MY comment after being triggered by uncomfortable truths. lol Thanks for playing, bud.

Frank Besser - @Muhammad... Yikes. Hope you stretched before that reach…

Muhammad Rasheed - Frank wrote: “Hope you stretched before that reach”

Even if I wasn’t kidding, what happened in the last 400 yrs that would objectively make something think that quip was “reaching?” I don’t get it.

What is it that you want me to believe about how white people behave towards Black people that is markedly different from what the facts of history show up into the modern day?

Frank Besser - Because slavery is no longer legal in USA?

The fact you don’t believe what was written and needed to bring race into this otherwise harmless story so you can wrap your mind around it is laughable and absurd. Hence the joke..

Muhammad Rasheed - Frank wrote: “Because slavery is no longer legal in USA?”

It’s still legal, they just call it something else in the modern day. The slave holder class weren’t going to let their gravy train go that easily.

Frank wrote: “The fact you don’t believe what was written”

Was I required to? lol I don’t believe the prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) was tortured & crucified anyway.

Frank wrote: “and needed to bring race into this otherwise harmless story so you can wrap your mind around it is laughable and absurd. Hence the joke..”

All I did was make my own joke upon that joke and every white person in the universe got red-faced triggered instead of either laughing it off, groaning and rolling your eyes, or just ignoring it.

It doesn’t take a PhD social-scientist to understand why you lot have an absolute screaming fit tantrum whenever the subject comes up even in a light jokey way like this one.

John M - @Muhammad... Imagine making an entire race of people your enemy on the basis of their skin color. Ill pray for you, my friend.

Muhammad Rasheed - @John M... Imagine thinking U.S. race relations was only about “skin color.” #gaslight

Obviously, it was always about money and political power. It was only about ‘skin color’ before the rise of European Imperialism.

John M - Im blacker than you and live in America, stop the virtue signaling victim card bullshit. Im a first generation immigrant, and i am well off as a doctor, things I couldnt dream of in my home country. No man can tell me that America isnt the greatest place in the world for opportunity regardless of skin color / who you are. My lived experience means more to me than any article or news piece you can drop, Muhammad. If you want to hate this great nation, that is your prerogative. Life is difficult and terrible, and foreign policy aside, I haven't seen a country in history do better than the US in terms of equity and quality of life for its citizens. You can keep hating from the outside, or better yet, attempt to make something of your nation instead of hating others. If you are an American, be happy you don’t have the perspective of people like me who came from the outside in. Have a great day, ill pray for you.

Muhammad Rasheed - John M wrote: “Im blacker than you and live in America”

You’re operating a faceless anonymous account. That means you’re a white person by default.

John M wrote: “stop the virtue signaling victim card bullshit”

Stop the racism, lying and gaslighting.

John M wrote: “Im a first generation immigrant”

That means saying you were “blacker” than me was ignorant. U.S. race relations history isn’t about “skin color” discrimination, it’s about lineage & heritage discrimination. The American descendants of slavery (ADOS) are economically discriminated against because the former slave holder descendants don’t want us to fairly compete with them in the markets. They prefer to deal with the “POC” immigrants because you all don’t bring the same historical baggage guilt-trip. Your usage of the term “victim card” means you side with white supremacy as a loyal lackey.

John M wrote: “My lived experience means more to me than any article or news piece you can drop, Muhammad.”

My ethnic group’s 400+ year experience in this nation we’ve built means more to me than any leeching parasitic immigrant too cowardly to stay and fix the sh*thole they escaped from.

John M wrote: “If you want to hate this great nation”

Between the two of us, I’m not the one who ran from his country. I stayed to fix the problems using the system’s infrastructure, while you ran from yours because it’s either hopelessly corrupt beyond repair, or you’re an international grifter who’s just following the easy money. Probably a bit of both.

Anyway, I don’t hate my country. I hate the white supremacist ideology and all those who support it. They stand out with their usage of slurs like “victim card.”

John M wrote: “I haven't seen a country in history do better than the US in terms of equity and quality of life for its citizens”

Despite the recent rhetoric in the national news, the USA’s government was made to be pro-immigrant. Our immigration policy was weaponized against ADOS back during Reconstruction, so of course you feel the way you feel.

John M wrote: “You can keep hating from the outside”

lol How am I on the “outside” when I’ve been here since before the Revolutionary War?

John M wrote: “or better yet, attempt to make something of your nation”

That’s literally what political activism is for. lol

John M wrote: “instead of hating others.”

Stop choosing a position worthy of hatred. Learn how to empathize and work with people different from you. Anti-Black American discrimination is evil.

John M wrote: “ill pray for you”

You white supremacists pray only to mammon. Keep it.

John M - Thats a whole lot of baseless assumptions. Seems like you have a picture of what is in your mind “an enemy” and find that said picture in everyone and everything you come across. I wasnt saying ill pray for you out of disrespect, im genuinely sad for someone such as yourself, people like you come in all sorts of flavors but they all have the same thing in common: Their boogyman is everywhere, and is everyone they see any disagreement with.

I have seen my fair share of American discrimination being a black man in a white neighborhood. It is absolutely nothing compared to a vast majority of the world, and nothing compared to how people in my country were persecuted. Look in the mirror and realize how good you really have it.

As for my country, yea you are correct it is beyond redemption, it is at the epicenter of a religious war that sees no end. My criticism was not for people escaping their fate, it is towards those who hate the very country who provided them solitude.

As for my identity, I plan on keeping it anonymous as to protect my livelihood from crazy people online. Im telling you who I am. Who you think I am is your own prerogative and not one im willing to convince you of and put myself out there in the process. Call me coward or whatever you want, I have a family to care for.

Muhammad Rasheed - John M wrote: “Thats a whole lot of baseless assumptions”

That’s a foolish comment considering you’re on record rejecting news articles as primary information sources because they make you uncomfortable.

John M wrote: “Seems like you have a picture of what is in your mind ‘an enemy’”

Said the guy who rejected my well-documented position using a common white supremacist slur.

John M wrote: “I wasnt saying ill pray for you out of disrespect”

Your entire position is hostile and disrespectful, so why would your personal idea/expression of “prayer” have any meaning to me?

John M wrote: “im genuinely sad for someone such as yourself”

I suggest you change utterly before the fruit of your karma catches up to you.

John M wrote: “people like you come in all sorts of flavors but they all have the same thing in common: Their boogyman is everywhere, and is everyone they see any disagreement with."

I posted the proof of the problems my people routinely deal with and you dismissed it and mocked me.

John M wrote: “I have seen my fair share of American discrimination being a black man in a white neighborhood”

You claimed you were a first generation immigrant, and you keep defaulting to shallow “skin color” bigotry while you ignored my examples of actual systemic racism that my people have dealt with for centuries.

John M wrote: “it is towards those who hate the very country who provided them solitude.”

Which means you have no idea what you are talking about. You are a disrespectful alien in someone else’s country, enjoying the privileges of a special favored immigrant class over the long-abused former slave class. You invented your own rhetoric to make your parasitic lifestyle somehow noble in your eyes.

John M wrote: “As for my identity, I plan on keeping it anonymous”

I expect cowardly hate trolls to act like cowardly hate trolls.

John M - I'm not ignoring the discrimination faced by black people in America, that is well known, documented and understood history. My point is that TODAY you have the same, if not more opportunities as I do. You can call me “alien” or whatever comment you want, it just shows the hate in your heart. You are so deeply rooted in rhetoric that you’re blinded to recognize your own privileges. To think that someone would look at me and you and be able to tell one of us is an African immigrant and the other is African American and then treat us different is beyond foolish. As long as you think you are a victim you will continue to live as one, you are a prisoner to your ideology.

Muhammad Rasheed - John M wrote: “I am not ignoring the discrimination faced by black people in America, that is well known, documented and understood history.”

Most of your own “understanding” is composed of historical retcons and propagandist misinformation.

John M wrote: “My point is that TODAY you have the same, if not more opportunities as I do.”

As a legal, natural born U.S. citizen, I certainly have more opportunities than the poor Nigerians (or whoever) you left behind in the mudhole you escaped from to come be a parasite in my country, but the U.S. immigrant class has infiltrated my government, made it MORE corrupt than what the villainous sons of the Confederacy laid, and given themselves privileges over me using the organized crime monopolization of power & influence model developed during the Prohibition era. Perhaps president Trump is trying to fix it with his deportation policies? It’s hard to tell since he himself is from an immigrant clan, so maybe he’s just trying to get one up on his clique’s rivals and nothing more.

John M wrote: “You can call me ‘alien’ or whatever comment you want”

Put your seatbelt on.

John M wrote: “it just shows the hate in your heart”

Why wouldn’t I hate those who came to my country as parasites, schemed with my traditional enemy against me, and here I find them on social media talking trash, gaslighting at me and mocking me with “akata” slurs? What about that behavior inspires friendship and good cheer to you?

John M wrote: “You are so deeply rooted in rhetoric that you’re blinded to recognize your own privileges.”

Said the alien who has done nothing but parrot misinformation rhetoric.

John M wrote: “To think that someone would look at me and you and be able to tell one of us is an African immigrant and the other is African American and then treat us different is beyond foolish.”

Contrary to popular belief, U.S. race relations isn’t about shallow racial phenotype traits, but about lineage & heritage. U.S. immigration was purposely weaponized against the American descendants of slavery (ADOS) to prevent us from having a labor monopoly—African and Caribbean blacks are favored over ADOS by white people because of this historical fact. You are either aware of this and are lying and gaslighting at me, or you are just ignorant of U.S. race relations.

John M wrote: “As long as you think you are a victim”

There are few things worse than aliens fake-lecturing at me on behalf of their white supremacist handlers.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

A Lone Voice of Counter-Bias

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "A Lone Voice of Counter-Bias." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Uppity Negress Redux - The thing I find most interesting about Derek Dixon’s claims about Tyler Perry is that Derek says his character was written to play directly into what Tyler told him his “perfect man” would be. 

And that is something I’ve long felt about Tyler Perry as a writer- that he uses his characters to explore and perform his personal biases, fantasies, and demons. 

It’s why I don’t watch his dysfunctional ass work.

Uppity Negress Redux - And it’s interesting to me that those fantasies overwhelmingly center abused blk women.

Muhammad Rasheed - Uppity wrote: "It’s why I don’t watch his dysfunctional ass work."

Uppity wrote: "And it’s interesting to me that those fantasies overwhelmingly center abused blk women."

It seems like people are critiquing a caricature of Perry's body of work while having only watched maybe one or two of the films themselves.

Uppity Negress Redux - @Muhammad... or, I’ve watched enough of his work to notice persistent patterns and despite insistence that I haven’t watched enough, each time I decide to give his work another try it was more of the same and I decided to divest completely rather than continuously allow his delusional fans who lack media literacy and taste try to convince me otherwise.

Have a good one.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Uppity... I'm not a Perry fan, I just noticed the same types of critiques paired with "I don't watch his stuff" comments. It seemed suspicious.

Uppity Negress Redux - it’s not suspicious. You just don’t like them.

Muhammad Rasheed - I only watched a few of his films myself, and was turned off by him from the Mo'Nique scandal. It did make my red flag go up when I saw the dog pile critiques against him before that, which I'll admit I didn't like, even though his product isn't marketed towards me.

This is my first time hearing about the sexual abuse allegations.

Uppity Negress Redux - then you need to unpack why you automatically assume ppls opinions must be based on something other than the work.

Are you granting him unearned benefit of the doubt simply because he’s a blk man? Do you see how that’s problematic when most of his critics are blk women with valid concerns about how he represents us?

Muhammad Rasheed - Uppity wrote: "then you need to unpack why you automatically assume ppls opinions must be based on something other than the work."

When I first noticed it, the critiques came from my direct demographic—Black American Male Superhero Genre Fans & Creators—and I thought they were just being unfair because their own tastes were so specialized. Then I remember Spike Lee's critique, which seemed very much like hater mess, similar to how salty Scorsese sounds over the modern superhero film trend.

Uppity wrote: "Are you granting him unearned benefit of the doubt simply because he’s a blk man?"

It had more to do with how he "came out of nowhere" with his first film's success, taking the Hollywood cartel by surprise. Then his subsequent power moves where he was able to film major blockbusters on his own lot impressed me. I could see why the establishment would deliberately try to sabotage his track for anti-Black American reasons of the usual sort. That's the bag where my suspicions would come from when I'd see a lot of people across various platforms all saying the same thing against him, like a mass troll attack. Not saying you were a part of that, that's just how it was starting to come across to me.

Uppity wrote: "Do you see how that’s problematic when most of his critics are blk women with valid concerns about how he represents us?"

I certainly understand why people would feel that way about it from that viewpoint. It's not my position to claim it wasn't true.

Uppity Negress Redux - this critique has been around since literally his plays before he even started shows and movies so the idea that it only surfaced “out of nowhere” with his movies is actually factually untrue. 😑

Muhammad Rasheed - Uppity wrote: "so the idea that it only surfaced 'out of nowhere' with his movies"

The "out of nowhere" part referenced his first movie's success, because the mainstream wasn't tracking his 'chitlin circuit' plays and had no idea who he was. That's what I meant with that part.

Michelle - @Muhammad... Tyler Perry movies that center an abused/traumatized black woman

A Fall from Grace

Why I Get Married

Why Did I Get Married Too

The Family That Preys

I Can Do Bad All By Myself

Diary of a Mad Black Woman

Meet the Browns

Straw

Duplicity

Mea Culpa

Nobody's Fool

Acrimony

Do we see a pattern yet? Or are we pretending that we're all making this up?

Uppity Negress Redux - @Muhammad... Literally his movies have similar critiques to the plays meaning he just added a Hollywood budget to the same trash. That means they’re not “out of nowhere”, they’re a direct continuation of the pattern which is what this post is about. Why that pattern exists.

I’m disengaging. Be best.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Uppity... Back in 2003, my fiancé, her daughter and mom all went to see his play when Perry's play came to Detroit. I had no idea who he was, and only heard a positive buzz around him at the time. When Diary of a Mad Black Woman the film came out a couple years later, I wanted to see it to see what the hype I remembered was about. My family's built-in fandom made me inclined to not judge it too harshly, and I was a sucker for his backstory and success.

Muhammad Rasheed - Michelle wrote: "Tyler Perry movies that center an abused/traumatized black woman [...] Do we see a pattern yet? Or are we pretending that we're all making this up?"

My peers at the time used to say that his work was bad, and they didn't like that he did the same stories all the time, critiques which seemed hypocritically unfair to me, considering other writer/directors were famous for doing the same types of comedies and the same types of mob movies, buddy cop movies, etc. There seemed to be brand new "Black Codes" rules conjured for Perry.

Uppity Negress Redux - @Muhammad... so then you’re the one who seems biased and unfamiliar with the body of work. Not the critics. Be best.

Kamal Williams - @Muhammad... nah homie, you're wrong. His movies overwhelmingly involve black women who are unnecessarily put through the ringer, to the point of being borderline trauma porn. And we can ha e a very long discussion on how his stories are riddled with plot holes and the characters constantly act in a way normal people wouldn't. And I'm not talking about in an "action-hero-suspension-of-belief" way, I'm talking about in a "no one would ever do that" type of way

Muhammad Rasheed - Kamal wrote: "unnecessarily put through the ringer"

Do you consider the over-the-top violence displayed in films by Tarantino to be unnecessarily putting his characters through the ringer?

Muhammad Rasheed - Kamal wrote: "And we can ha e a very long discussion on how his stories are riddled with plot holes and the characters constantly act in a way normal people wouldn't"

I would argue that there isn't a single film script out there that doesn't suffer from the same. The Uppity Negress may be able to provide a nuanced and well-thought out critique for the material, but it's difficult to read the same from you.

Kamal Williams - no, because the violence in Tarantino movies 1) is exaggerated and stylized, and 2) actually serves a point. And I didnt say violence per se, but the trauma that he ONLY inflicts on Black women. They are his favorite victims, for some reason

Uppity Negress Redux - @Kamal... not only that, but Tarantino is absolutely critiqued for his gratuitous violence and use of profanity.

So the question is, goes this man tune in to a different frequency when the critique is leveraged towards BM?

Muhammad Rasheed - Kamal wrote: "no"

Ah. So the rules are magically different for Quentin and he gets your blessing, even while he's calling you 'n1993r' all the time. I see.

Kamal wrote: "because the violence in Tarantino movies 1) is exaggerated and stylized"

How is that different from: "the characters constantly act in a way normal people wouldn't [...] in a 'no one would ever do that' type of way"? Is that not the very definition of exaggerated & stylized? #BlackCodes

Kamal wrote: "and 2) actually serves a point"

It's pretty clear that the point of Perry's stories is to show women overcome adversity, usually from the Christian spiritual theme. It seems obvious from here.

Kamal wrote: "And I didnt say violence per se, but the trauma that he ONLY inflicts on Black women"

You're babbling.

Kamal wrote: "They are his favorite victims, for some reason"

I'm pretty sure that most high-profile writer/directors have their signature tales they prefer to tell. Do you sound the same way when talking about Tim Burton's work?

Muhammad Rasheed - @Kamal... Lots of film makers are impotently critiqued over their 'gratuitous violence and use of profanity,' but is it of the same intensity, with political force backing, as the critiques against Perry's artistic expression? I personally thought it was incredibly irresponsible to have Killmonger shoot that Black woman in the face as his introduction to us in a 'movement' film everyone took their kids to see (but it was alright because he was cute and he called Angela "Auntie," I guess). The lack of an uproar fuels my red flag suspicions over the Perry mass critiques (separate from the sexual abuse allegations, of course).

Brandi Cryer - @Muhammad... I've watched the majority of his projects cuz my mom is a fan. I agree with Uppity Negress Redux. You only need to watch one or two and see its the same script.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Brandi... The Uppity Negress said she watched a few and was turned off, and then came back later to watch some and confirmed there was a consistent theme she disagreed with. Her sampling and analysis is closer to an objective scientific method than just watching two movies and then lazily deciding to side with the mindless hive mind as you're suggesting.

Muhammad Rasheed - I'm not a fan of his work because I prefer the speculative fiction genres over human interest tales. I don't care about what he chooses to create as an artist; it doesn't seem over-the-top to me, just a specialized niche.

Muhammad Rasheed - Brandi wrote: "now that bw are critiquing him they're defending him"

Madea Cartoon Study #1 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)

A Word on the Most Popular anti-Tyler Perry Critiques (Sunday, September 25, 2011)

I felt Perry burned himself after the way he treated Mo'Nique, which to me meant he was corrupted by the power from the new circles he moved in.

Taniku Ikyg - @Muhammad... one or two? Would you keep watching a directors work of you didn't like it? What I'm hearing is to keep watching because maybe ONE day the blk wmn won't suffer? I'm pretty sure 99% of his work the blk wmn suffers

Muhammad Rasheed - Taniku wrote: "one or two?"

Probably.

Taniku wrote: "Would you keep watching a directors work of you didn't like it?"

I don't follow Perry's work, not because I don't like it, but because I prefer other genre stories than what he produces. I don't watch films that I don't like, even from celebrated directors. I can't stand Scorsese and will never watch another mob flick.

Taniku wrote: "What I'm hearing is to keep watching because maybe ONE day the blk wmn won't suffer?"

Then you must have read someone else's post and only thought it was me. My position is that most of the anti-Perry voices I hear come from a mass troll attack primarily made up of easily manipulated sheep. The goal is to remove a powerful, but indiscrete Black American from his position, and confiscate his holdings.

Taniku wrote: "I'm pretty sure 99% of his work the blk wmn suffers"

And I'm equally pretty sure that 99% of those women characters successfully overcame whatever the story's conflict was in a Christian testimony based template. #AndStillIRise

Alison Mason - @Muhammad... you don’t have to watch every film in its entirety to know the general theme. I’ve seen enough clips and memes to fully understand what type of movies he creates, which is why I don’t watch them. The only film I’ve watched recently was Straw and it was so upsetting that I was unsettled for days. That’s enough to not watch anything else he creates

Muhammad Rasheed - Alison wrote: "you don’t have to watch every film in its entirety to know the general theme."

They were mad because he makes stories from a subgenre of Black women overcoming relationship conflict in a Christian testimony theme. For some reason, Perry isn't allowed to make such films and it offends them.

Alison wrote: "I’ve seen enough clips and memes to fully understand what type of movies he creates, which is why I don’t watch them."

Makes sense. If you've decided you don't want to watch those types of stories then you certainly shouldn't.

Alison wrote: "The only film I’ve watched recently was Straw and it was so upsetting that I was unsettled for days."

I'll assume that Perry sent some goons to your house and forced you to watch Straw at gun point. How terrible. He shouldn't do such things. I'm surprised you didn't lead with that, or press charges for that matter.

Alison wrote: "That’s enough to not watch anything else he creates"

I would've thought you would have come to that conclusion beforehand after watching all the clips and memes as you said.

Alison Mason - I know all about Tyler Perry’s work, he’s been around for years. I did watch Straw because it was trending and people were saying it was a great movie—- I was skeptical before I watched it and watching it only reconfirmed what I already knew. I’ve never been a fan and I’m still not. He likes the idea of black womens’ grief

Muhammad Rasheed - Alison wrote: "I know all about Tyler Perry’s work, he’s been around for years."

Yes, and you said you'd watched so many clips and memes, that it made you a high-level expert.

Alison wrote: "I did watch Straw because it was trending and people were saying it was a great movie—-"

Which is why this line is so weird. Suddenly you forgot who Tyler Perry was it seems, and what? Subjected yourself to material you said was unacceptable to the point of needing to cancel him permanently.

Alison wrote: "I was skeptical before I watched it"

Sure, because of all those clips and memes you saw that made you an expert on any and everything Tyler Perry. I'm tracking.

Alison wrote: "and watching it only reconfirmed what I already knew."

I guess I can support thoroughness as an extreme sport?

Alison wrote: "I’ve never been a fan and I’m still not."

But you watched Straw (2025) anyway which gives the impression of a daredevil thrill ride stunt.

Alison wrote: "He likes the idea of black womens’ grief"

Are they still grieving by the end of the films, or do they successfully negotiate the stories' conflicts to triumph in the end under the Christian testimony banner? #AndStillIRise

Alison Mason - you’re arguing in bad faith. I didn’t say I was a “high-level expert.” That would be quite embarrassing to be a “high-level expert” in Tyler Perry films. And why are you writing Straw (2005) like that? Is there another version from another year? This conversation got odd really quickly. You seem to have a vested interest in this producer and his work. Enjoy.

Muhammad Rasheed - Alison wrote: "you’re arguing in bad faith."

Am I?

Alison wrote: "I didn’t say I was a 'high-level expert.'”

Perhaps I'm guilty of a little hyperbole, but you did say you "fully understood" the type of material he makes based on watching some clips and memes. lol

Alison wrote: "That would be quite embarrassing to be a 'high-level expert' in Tyler Perry films."

"Fully understood" means a very specific thing.

Alison wrote: "And why are you writing Straw (2005) like that?"

Is this a new #BlackCode law you're about to spring on a Black man? Oh noooz...!

Alison wrote: "Is there another version from another year?"

I was just pointing out that despite you "fully understanding" EXACTLY what Perry's work was about, you deliberately subjected yourself to his latest film in this very year and then writhed on the ground in self-inflicted agony. Forgive me, but it's hard to feel sorry for something like that. It's objectively silly, like you have too many goofy white friends who like to play faux-victims. Remember that one Tweet of the white lady that put the paper target on her forehead and claimed this is what is was like being a white woman in America, and the respond was, "Perfect. Because it's not real and you put it on your head yourself." That's how your Straw (2025) experience reads.

Alison wrote: "This conversation got odd really quickly."

Heh.

Alison wrote: "You seem to have a vested interest in this producer and his work."

I don't watch as many clips and memes as you, so I'm still a lightweight.

Alison wrote: "Enjoy."

I have. Thank you for the exchange. Peace.

Tay Arianna - @Muhammad... you’re being willfully obtuse for the sake of it and you KNOW it. There’s bettter ways to cling to rich black people than to uphold ones who CONSTANTLY write blk woman trauma p0rn. But then again as a fellow blk man of Tyler you probably enjoy it too because you all enjoy nothing more than to see us suffer. We don’t want to see that for YEARS ON END. But you don’t care because yall just need to have that “exceptional negro” even if that means stepping on black women.

Muhammad Rasheed - Tay wrote: "you’re being willfully obtuse"

People only say that to me when their argument is made up of 99.999% nonsensical political propaganda, or they see me arguing with political propagandists and they aren't skilled enough in the rhetoric to tag-in to help. So, they start yelling at me like this.

May I help you, ma'am? What do you want? For me to stand still while you fuss at me?

Jesse Harrison McLeod - @Muhammad... I only need to watch a couple to spot a pattern. I don't need to step in dog s*** more than once to tell you that I don't like it. Go touch grass, please.

Muhammad Rasheed - Jesse wrote: "I only need to watch a couple to spot a pattern"

That's not very scientific. It's odd that you think this proclamation functions as some kind of flex. I'll assume it's performative for Her Lady and the local minions, too.

Jesse wrote: "I don't need to step in dog s*** more than once to tell you that I don't like it."

Sure.

Jesse wrote: "Go touch grass, please."

Hm. If I disconnect from the Internet and go outside where the grass is, I will find people who think exactly like you do standing out there on their phones. I'd rather just stay here.

What else do you have?

Meaghen Couvillon Haynie - @Uppity... they're also as formulaic as scooby doo episodes

Muhammad Rasheed - @Meaghen... Did Tyler Perry also make the Scooby Doo episodes? Or is this another #BlackCodes law that Black American men are not allowed to be formulaic in their art?

Tay Arianna - @Muhammad... okay dude. So you had nothing to say so you started pulling words out of a hat. Political propaganda???? Where was my comment political???? If anyone is saying something nonsensical it’s you with this COMPLETE straw man argument. Please seek help.

Muhammad Rasheed - Tay wrote: "Political propaganda????"

Yes. The argument is presented through a socio-political propaganda POV.

["Social commentary from a progressive blk, femme lens"]

See?

Tay wrote: "Where was my comment political????"

Yours wasn't, because you aren't skilled in the rhetoric. That's why you're so loud & fussy.

Tay wrote: "it’s you with this COMPLETE straw man argument"

I didn't accuse you of performing a political propaganda argument. I said you wanted to, but couldn't, so you just started yelling. It appears to be your style. I'm good with it since it's all you have. Just don't abuse me with it, is all.

Meaghen Couvillon Haynie - @Muhammad... I was over scooby doo before I was out of elementary school because it was predictable and formulaic. Lazy writing is lazy writing.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Meaghen... The Scooby Doo show is still out. Are you boycotting it for its offensive formulaic template, or only product that Black people make when they do it?

Tay Arianna - @Muhammad... nobody was “yelling” but proceed with wanting to be a victim. I wasn’t going to address that part but since you KEEP saying that for whatever reason. As I said please seek help. And you literally did accuse me of performing a political propaganda argument. Go read your own stuff. You’re not very good at this. At. All.

Now I’m done giving you jerking material. 🤨

Muhammad Rasheed - Tay wrote: "nobody was 'yelling'”

You used 700-question marks at a time. How is that not yelling?

Tay wrote: "but proceed with wanting to be a victim"

"..and she hurt my feelings, officer. 😥"

Tay wrote: "I wasn’t going to address that part"

Oh, wait... are you actually addressing stuff? I thought you were just fussing at me. What's this new thing?

Tay wrote: "but since you KEEP saying that for whatever reason. As I said please seek help."

I seek help by commenting on FB. 😬

Tay wrote: "And you literally did accuse me of performing a political propaganda argument."

You should calm down (for once) and go back and reread it.

Tay wrote: "Go read your own stuff."

"And she stole my line, officer. 😥"

Tay wrote: "You’re not very good at this. At. All."

Meh.

Tay wrote: "Now I’m done giving you jerking material. 🤨"

You're very selfish.

Ebónné Latrice - @Muhammad... the way you're vigorously defending his clear pattern makes me side eye your work. Are you defending Tyler because the same patterns also persist in YOUR work so you feel like this is also a direct critique of you?

Muhammad Rasheed - @Ebónné... No, I don't do relationship drama human interest stories. I do horror, fantasy and superhero genre blend.

Meaghen Couvillon Haynie - @Muhammad... I just said they're both lazy writing. The problematic stuff were things I learned later. And im not about to try to get "enlightened yt girl points" by giving you a scorecard of black artists i support, as though that would prove anything to anyone. You're not fooling anyone. You want a fight and will ignore anything that doesnt point to that aim. Im very sorry this is how you have to get your dopamine hits.

Muhammad Rasheed - Meaghen wrote: "And im not about to try to get 'enlightened yt girl points'"

And I oop...! 👀

*block*

Uppity Negress Redux - Important context to the Tyler Perry lawsuit. Derek Dixon went to the EEOC first and got his right to sue through them. 

In case you’re unaware of what the EEOC is and what they do- it’s their job to pre-investigate the validity of claims like Dixon’s. The EEOC does not grant the right to sue in cases with no substantial evidence of wrongdoing. It usually is in response to the employer denying mediation. 

I have a pending EEOC case against a former employer and the process is very thorough. 

To me, this gives the claims additional validity. Mr Dixon did not go for a money grab. He tried to assert his rights to a harassment free work place. We ALL have that RIGHT.

Muhammad Rasheed - Uppity wrote: "Mr Dixon did not go for a money grab. He tried to assert his rights to a harassment free work place."

I wonder if this would open the door for others to get the money grab suits?

Uppity Negress Redux - @Muhammad... I don’t care what victims ask for money or how much. I care if they were victimized and I don’t trust anyone who doesn’t or who focuses on anything but that.

Shari Careathers - @Muhammad... so you just read one section of the entire post, huh?

Muhammad Rasheed - @Shari... That's the part that stood out to me.

Lauren Moreland - @Muhammad... maybe ask yourself why that stuck out to you and why you made that connection

Muhammad Rasheed - Lauren wrote: "maybe ask yourself why that stuck out to you"

No need. I already know why it stood out to me. I wondered if it was a long-term strategy with multiple components to it.

Uppity Negress Redux - @Muhammad... at this point, it’s very clear that you have a bias on the topic.

My comments is not the place for you to unpack it.

I’m sure there’s some place on the Internet for it. It’s not here.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Uppity... awww. Yes, ma'am. 😔

See Also :
Madea Cartoon Study #1

Madea Cartoon Study #2

Madea versus Mammy

A Word on the Most Popular anti-Tyler Perry Critiques

Critiquing the Critics of Tyler Perry

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Discerning the Assurances of God

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Discerning the Assurances of God." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Darko Bulatovic - Muslims, knowing Allah allowed for Jews and Christians to mislead them self by corrupting the text, what assurance did you get from Allah that you are special in that regard?
Muhammad Rasheed - The question asks me, as a Muslim, to ignore common sense and historical knowledge to blindly convert to the caricatured strawman form of Islam that xenophobic online hate trolls invented to mock the faith.
There’s a network of online Christian missionaries (Sam Shamoun, Christian Prince, GodLogic, etc.) who specialize in using semantic word play and the deliberate twisting of Islamic concepts to convert their preferred prey—third world, poorly-studied ‘cultural Muslims’—to Christianity, and “Allah allowed for Jews and Christians to mislead them self[sic]” is one of those disingenuous twists. It gives the impression that the Qur’an is saying that the Jews and Christians went into a zombie-like trance and inadvertently corrupted their texts without realizing it, when in fact, the corruption was very much a conscious, deliberate act, the mentality of which was not present among the early Muslims, whose fire of faith zeal inspired them to actively want to preserve the Word of God their prophet preached with full devotion. Obviously, the Jews and Christians NEVER had such an attitude about their books, and seemed to take for granted that there would always be a new prophet coming along to return them to the Path (while they protested the holy mission kicking-n-screaming, mind you), so they held no sense of urgency that they should strictly record what the prophets preached from their Lord.
Allah allowed this because it is humanity’s job to manage our affairs based on what was revealed. If we decide to mismanage the gifts given to us by our Guardian Lord—no matter who we are—then we will answer for our choices on the Day of Judgment. The Question’s author wants to pin his people’s poor guardianship of their book on God, when that demonstration of a lack of accountability is not how any of this works at all.
Darko Bulatovic - Haha there is a difference between you and me.
I know I will stand to Allah alone and have to prove I loved those who believe in Him.
Muhammad Rasheed - Those who directly corrupted the text will be held accountable for what they did, and those of you who blindly support their corruption will be held accountable for what you did. And you will indeed do so standing alone before your Lord.
Darko Bulatovic - What will be with people like you? Who know nothing for certain but judged by hear-say? You have shown evidence or detailed knowledge of what exactly? Of nothing.
Muhammad Rasheed - Darko wrote: “What will be with people like you?”
Whatever God so Wills, naturally. In scripture, He said that people like me—who believe in our Lord unseen—will receive forgiveness and a great reward.
Darko wrote: “Who know nothing for certain but judged by hear-say?”
Do you think the inerrant Word of God is “hear-say?” How foolish.
Darko wrote: “You have shown evidence or detailed knowledge of what exactly? Of nothing.”
Am I expected to believe that a creature like you is somehow a respecter of knowledge & evidence? lol The nature of your original question above reveals this is not at all the case.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Decoding the Flimsy 'Who is White?' Rhetoric

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "Decoding the Flimsy 'Who is White?' Rhetoric." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

James Fell - 

A Trojan could have prevented this Troy.

Greg Lose - Honestly doesnt even look all that while….

Muhammad Rasheed - @Greg... He looks exactly like a white guy. He may not be a Michael B. Jordan alpha-specimen among the race, but he definitely displays the white racial phenotype kit.

Nikolai Hermansen - @Greg... He looks Balkan tbh. Some Slavic, Turkish, maybe Mongolic dna.

Just based of visual cues, but of course I can’t know for sure.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Nikolai... Are those "races" listed, or nationalities/ethnicities? Are there currently whites, blacks and Asian racial phenotypes living in the Balkans, Slav, Turkey and Mongolia?

Nikolai Hermansen - @Muhammad... Those are a mix of phenotypes and ethnicities.

The Turkic peoples (those that live in Turkey today), originally came from the steppes over near Mongolia and western China, they migrated east, and thus Turks spread into the Balkans.

None of those are black, mongolic is pretty wide in terms of history. The mongol empire was ginormous, and much of its population were Turkic-mongolic peoples of the steppes. Some of their successor states ruled large swaths of Eastern Europe for centuries, and thus they also spread from there.

The Slavs, I believe, came down from the now southern Russian plains/steppes, the bulgars migrated from around the urals down to modern day Bulgaria in around the 7th century AD.

Muhammad Rasheed - 

ME: "Are there currently whites, blacks and Asian racial phenotypes living in the Balkans, Slav, Turkey and Mongolia?"

YOU: "The Turkic peoples (those that live in Turkey today), originally came from"

There are lots of diverse groups in Turkey and in these other places, from many different backgrounds. Of the people currently living in Turkey, are there representatives of the white, black and Asian racial phenotype?

Nikolai Hermansen - Dude, don’t be rude.

There are some. But there’s more than just one phenotype for each of those groups. There isn’t just one “white phenotype”, and so on.

There are many types of people in Turkey, but the main population, those of TURKIC origin, came from the steppes, as I said.

How is this even relevant to what I said? Why are you bringing in race? I was just taking a loose guess about his genetic heritage based on his fave.

Muhammad Rasheed - Nikolai wrote: "Dude, don’t be rude."

What did I post that was rude?

Nikolai wrote: "But there’s more than just one phenotype for each of those groups. There isn’t just one 'white phenotype,' and so on."

This is 100% my point in every way. There's a difference between racial phenotype "race" versus nationalities/ethnicities. This guy may be Balkan, Slavic, Turkish, but he also has the white racial phenotype kit. 

Bringing up his ethnic/nationality in a racial discussion is irrelevant, and even could be considered a clumsy misdirection attempt.

Nikolai Hermansen - He looks mostly mongolic/turkic in my opinion, how is that white phenotype? Would you considering mongols and Turks white? Many don’t.

It’s not as easy as just saying “he’s white”. There’s much more to it, especially when it comes to ethnicity. And I didn’t bring up nationality, I brought up ethnicity, which is extremely relevant in a conversation* about the look of a person.

And are you trying to accuse me of misdirection, or what? And for what?

Muhammad Rasheed - Nikolai wrote: "He looks mostly mongolic/turkic in my opinion, how is that white phenotype?"

He has light skin, a thin nose, straight hair and a round eye. These are the Caucasoid racial features.

Nikolai wrote: "Would you considering mongols and Turks white?"

Which returns me to my original question—are there whites, blacks and Asian representatives of the three racial phenotype groups living in those nations? What does nationality have to do with race?

Nikolai wrote: "Many don’t."

You're attempting to use the Appeal to the Majority logical fallacy to prove a point? Curious.

Nikolai wrote: "It’s not as easy as just saying 'he’s white.'"

It is if you have eyes to see with. If you're ignoring what's real to operate from behind a deceitful ideology, then the faux-complexity can come into it.

Nikolai wrote: "There’s much more to it"

Not organically.

Nikolai wrote: "especially when it comes to ethnicity"

lol Ethnicities often contain multiple racial groups, especially those that fell within the very racially diverse Ottoman Empire.

Nikolai wrote: "And I didn’t bring up nationality"

Meanwhile, both Turkey and Mongolia are nations.

Nikolai wrote: "I brought up ethnicity, which is extremely relevant in a conversation* about the look of a person."

Only if you're attempting to create confusion from behind the tenets of an ideology-based mindset.

Nikolai wrote: "And are you trying to accuse me of misdirection, or what?"

Sure, if it turns out that's what you're actually doing.

Nikolai wrote: "And for what?"

Well, from here it looks like the point is to pretend that only the most attractive white people are authentically "real" white people, while the ugly ones are somehow magically not, apparently so that you can advocate for Hitler's Aryan Ideal doctrine. White nationalist racist hate trolls do that type of clown-world foolishness all the time, where they pretend that Gabourey Sidibe and Lester Green are the average Black people and only Brad Pitt and Taylor Swift are the only true-authentic look for white people.

See Also:

The History Exposed When the Facts Routinely Glossed Over by the Mainstream Narrative are Scrutinized

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

The True Religion of the Israelite Prophets

 

[original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The True Religion of the Israelite Prophets." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Conscious - [MEME] "God was always invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand." ~Richard Feynman

Muhammad Rasheed - Notably, Dr. Feynman stopped being so publicly vocal and confident in his atheist beliefs once the cosmic microwave background radiation was discovered which proved the universe had a beginning, as described in Big Bang Theory. The implications shook Feynman, disturbed him to his core. Einstein, too, was forced to re-evaluate his opinions of "Who is God?" from these findings.

Zoraiz J. Khan - @Conscious... This is the most retarded argument in the history of theology,Judaism started because of pharaohs oppression, Christianity was found because of Romans oppression,Islam was found in order to tackle the societal injustice of arab, Anyone using this argument is either uneducated or plain retard.

Muhammad Rasheed - Zoraiz wrote: "Judaism started because of pharaohs oppression"

Judaism started when the Pharisees used the talmudic rulings to dictate the religion instead of the Tanakh. The religion of Moses and the other Israelite prophets was not Judaism, it was called Bani Israel.

Zoraiz J. Khan - @Muhammad... wait what? bani israel was a group not a religion bani israel were descendants of jacob,How can you possibly confuse religion with term used for descendants?

Muhammad Rasheed - Zoraiz J. Khan It was both the name of a group and the name of the religion of the Israelite prophets.

"Judaism" is tied specifically to the Talmud. Note that the Beta Israel group of Ethiopia had never heard of the Talmud or Judaism. Their expression of the religion was frozen from the Solomonic era when they left Jerusalem.

Zoraiz J. Khan -  Judaism is tied to judah, Kingdom of judah when kingdo of david and Solomon was split.... Nothing to do with talmud, Regardless It's irrelevant to the point i made.

Muhammad Rasheed - What they chose to name it is different from its actual origin and usage. Judaism is not the ancient religion of the prophets, it was created by the Pharisees.

In fact, the messiah, son of Mary attempted to bring back Bani Israel to the people and return them to the Path of the Lord thy God, but he was opposed by the leaders of the colluding Pharisee & Sadducee cliques, who jealously guarded their power monopoly.

Zoraiz J. Khan - One can say the same about bani israel, It's an arabic word isn't? It means children of israel and again it's not a religion but a noun used for Descendants of jacob...

Muhammad Rasheed - Zoraiz wrote: "It's an arabic word isn't?"

It means the same in both Hebrew and Arabic. In Hebrew, 'bani' also means "built" among other things. Its use as the title of the prophets' religion is not unusual as you're trying to force it to be.

You are unaware of the concept of the synonym?

Muhammad Rasheed - The Ethiopian Jewish clan called themselves Beta Israel—'bet' meaning 'house' in Hebrew. "Built" and "house" clearly share a root, providing more insight into an expanded usage of Bani Israel beyond what you want to confine it to.

Zoraiz J. Khan - After spending my whole life in Saudi Arabia I'm pretty certain bani means children of in Arabic...like Bani Hashim Bani israel...why you're wasting your time?

Muhammad Rasheed - I didn't deny that it means child, son, posterity in its most common usage; I said it also means these other things.

You're advocating to force it to mean ONLY one thing, ignoring the synonyms, which looks suspicious and dubious.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

The Annoying Séance Readings of Corny Fandom

Spectrum Fantastic Art Live - “Jimi Hendrix: The Last Supper“ by Jean “Moebius” Giraud.

Dan Alcaxzar - Jimi would’ve absolutely loved this

Muhammad Rasheed - 🙄

Dan Alcaxzar - ????

Muhammad Rasheed - This you?

Dan Alcaxzar - jimi was a creative in every sense, he was known to be an art lover and admirer of surrealism. Wouldn’t be a stretch to assume he would’ve loved the art of Moebius. Just my opinion.

Muhammad Rasheed - Expressing the opinion of what another person from an alien ethnic group & culture would have loved or not, as if it were a definitive truth, is weird.

Hendrix could have expressed an admiring appreciation for Moebius' draftsmanship, while being repulsed by the choice in iconography/symbolism as filtered through the politics of his day. You don't know.

**********************

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Annoying Séance Readings of Corny Fandom." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

________________________________

Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

Real World Knowledge Can Limit Understanding of The Force

 Freeman Grey - 

Muhammad Rasheed - She was not a master of The Force, so her innate sensitivity didn't move him. What Darth Vader incorrectly thought he knew of Leia's background at that point prevented him from connecting any Force sensitivity dots swirling around her. Only during Return of the Jedi (1983) did he realize what those Force connectors actually meant, when Luke gave away his own feelings for her while in hiding .

J. Richard Stevens - Darth Vader didn't sense that Luke was his son in the same movie?

Is he supposed to have some kind of force sensitive paternity testing power?

Muhammad Rasheed - @J. Richard... Vader seemed to realize that Luke was his son pretty early on, sometime during the Empire Strikes Back (1980), at least.

J. Richard Stevens - @Muhammad... well, if you read the comics, you can find out exactly the point when he did.

But my point was that he could tell Luke was strong with the force, but had no idea of his parentage.

So the real question should’ve been whether Vader sensed force sensitivity in Leia, not why he couldn’t tell she was his daughter. 

Muhammad Rasheed - J. Richard wrote: "well, if you read the comics"

No, thank you. I only care for the first 3-films and to a limited degree, The Phantom Menace. The rest of that material is of bad fan-fiction quality and irritates me.

J. Richard wrote: "So the real question should’ve been whether Vader sensed force sensitivity in Leia"

Considering the Jedi and Co. are always commenting on how sensitive non-Force users are "strong in The Force" and "The Force is strong with this one," et cetera, this doesn't appear to be a serious question at all.

See Also: 

Batman versus The Force by M. Rasheed

"If You Only Knew the Power of the FORCE." by M. Rasheed

________________________________
Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!

The Worse Fandom of Any Sport

 [original cartoon pending]

CITATION
Rasheed, Muhammad. "The Worse Fandom of Any Sport." Cartoon. The Official Website of Cartoonist M. Rasheed 00 Date 20XX. Pen & ink w/Adobe Photoshop color.

CLICK & SUBSCRIBE below for the Artist's Description of this #MRasheedCartoons image:

M. Rasheed on YouTube!

M. Rasheed on BitChute!

**************************

Cedric Green - BOXING 🥊

 

Muhammad Rasheed - Calisthenics and bodybuilding are not combat systems.

Kyrillos Bon - @Muhammad... running is. Look at Mayweather.

Muhammad Rasheed - @Kyrillos... I'm actually a big fan of the skills that make up the Sweet Science (offense, defense, skill-in-techniques, battle strategy, fitness/stamina, etc.), so I don't consider the high-level ability to strike your opponent without receiving damage in return to be a negative. The pros are supposed to be highly-skilled and well-rounded.

I don't have any respect for two under-skilled palookas who just slug it out without even trying to block or get out of the way (see: Gatti vs Ward). I prefer a chess match as the boxers try to solve one another's puzzle as two elites.

Ignorant fans who don't appreciate true boxing are bad for the sport because, as the people who pay for event tickets and pay-per-views, boxing industry execs will market to them. This in turn causes the coaches not to teach certain fundamentals because the ignorant fans won't appreciate them and will actually boo the fighters if they see high-level skills. Ignorant fans ruin the culture of the sport.

See Also: The Corrosion of Quality Boxing by M. Rasheed

________________________________
Get a signed copy of M. Rasheed's first novel!