Randy Green's Blog, page 420
December 27, 2013
Who’s Your Daddy Now? – Part 1
The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.” [Luke 1:35]
Once upon a time there was this young Jewish maiden of lowly estate. Her name was Miriam of the tribe of Judah. Well, a strange thing happened to her on the way to bed one night. Would you believe an honest to goodness angel from heaven appeared to her? Yes, he did! What do you mean, “No, he did not!” Did so.
Anyway, Miriam was taken aback. Don’t ask me why. Just because she was a young lass of probably 14 years old or thereabouts and all alone in the dark, that was no reason for her to get all scaredy cat on us. Well, maybe it was. Nowadays we are so numbed at the unusual by TV and movie syfy, that we no longer have the good sense to get scared out of our gourd should a strange man appear to us glowing in the dark.
But Miriam had no TV set. She was broke and couldn’t afford one. Besides, no one bothered to invent a TV set yet, so the malls and internet wholesalers didn’t carry them. Come to think of it, there weren’t any malls or internet back then either. Those guys didn’t bother to invent anything, it would seem! But enough of this. Let’s exit Digression Boulevard and return to Miriam, shall we?
She saw this glowing alien and her knees began knocking rather loudly. So the alien attempted to comfort her with gentle words. He said, “Fear not, Miriam!” Unfortunately, but the alien was not accustomed to life on earth and mere mortals with sensitive ears. When he spoke those words, the walls of Miriam’s lowly abode rattled and shook fiercely. She well-nigh leaped out of her nightie!
So the alien, er, I mean angel, started over. He whispered in very small, soft words, “Don’t be afraid, little lass. You’re going to have a baby boy soon.”
Miriam was no longer afraid. Now she was offended! After all, she wasn’t a trollop. She wasn’t easy. She was a deeply godly young lady. She was saving herself for her future husband, she wanted that alien to know. How dare this alien, er, I mean angel, accuse her of being promiscuous! Why the nerve of this, this, this…whatever he is! Miriam retorted, “You lunatic! I’m a virgin, and virgins don’t have babies! Didn’t your mama ever teach you about the birds and the bees?”
In reply the angel uttered the remarkable words we quoted at the beginning of this post. In our next post we will continue this fantastically wonderful saga.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Genesis: Volume 1 and Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Once upon a time there was this young Jewish maiden of lowly estate. Her name was Miriam of the tribe of Judah. Well, a strange thing happened to her on the way to bed one night. Would you believe an honest to goodness angel from heaven appeared to her? Yes, he did! What do you mean, “No, he did not!” Did so.
Anyway, Miriam was taken aback. Don’t ask me why. Just because she was a young lass of probably 14 years old or thereabouts and all alone in the dark, that was no reason for her to get all scaredy cat on us. Well, maybe it was. Nowadays we are so numbed at the unusual by TV and movie syfy, that we no longer have the good sense to get scared out of our gourd should a strange man appear to us glowing in the dark.
But Miriam had no TV set. She was broke and couldn’t afford one. Besides, no one bothered to invent a TV set yet, so the malls and internet wholesalers didn’t carry them. Come to think of it, there weren’t any malls or internet back then either. Those guys didn’t bother to invent anything, it would seem! But enough of this. Let’s exit Digression Boulevard and return to Miriam, shall we?
She saw this glowing alien and her knees began knocking rather loudly. So the alien attempted to comfort her with gentle words. He said, “Fear not, Miriam!” Unfortunately, but the alien was not accustomed to life on earth and mere mortals with sensitive ears. When he spoke those words, the walls of Miriam’s lowly abode rattled and shook fiercely. She well-nigh leaped out of her nightie!
So the alien, er, I mean angel, started over. He whispered in very small, soft words, “Don’t be afraid, little lass. You’re going to have a baby boy soon.”
Miriam was no longer afraid. Now she was offended! After all, she wasn’t a trollop. She wasn’t easy. She was a deeply godly young lady. She was saving herself for her future husband, she wanted that alien to know. How dare this alien, er, I mean angel, accuse her of being promiscuous! Why the nerve of this, this, this…whatever he is! Miriam retorted, “You lunatic! I’m a virgin, and virgins don’t have babies! Didn’t your mama ever teach you about the birds and the bees?”
In reply the angel uttered the remarkable words we quoted at the beginning of this post. In our next post we will continue this fantastically wonderful saga.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Genesis: Volume 1 and Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 26, 2013
It’s Christmas. I’m Inspired! – Part 3
And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” [Luke 2:13-14, KJV]
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
Here’s the bottom line. To assert someone is attempting to smuggle in heresy by asserting God is “pleased with” or “has favor toward” sinful man—well, that is what it is, viz., mere assertion. Some folks hear the Gospel and are born again as sons of God. We’re in His family. I beg the pardon of our learned savant self-styled, but God most assuredly is well pleased with His own kids. His favor does rest on His own sons and daughters.
A learned savant ought to first learn before he attempts to teach. If he doesn’t hunger and thirst enough to put in long hours alone with the Lord and His Word; if he isn’t inclined to learn what he can from those whom the Lord has chosen to teach; if he hasn’t the foggiest about the Greek and Hebrew texts—ai yai yai! What makes such a one believe the Lord has called him to be a teacher?!? Let me answer that. His pride is at the root of the problem. He needs to repent of his sin and seek the Lord’s will for his life.
During this blessed time of the year, let’s get real with the Lord, even as He is real with us. He did give us His one and only Son to die on our behalf. Now that is some gift! He is worth spending our time with, our Bible open and mouth in prayer. It doesn’t matter which Bible of the three I listed you have open either. You won’t go wrong with any of them, dear friends. Let’s worship the Lord and thank Him for His Word, not argue about things we know little to nothing about. Have a blessed Christmas!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
Here’s the bottom line. To assert someone is attempting to smuggle in heresy by asserting God is “pleased with” or “has favor toward” sinful man—well, that is what it is, viz., mere assertion. Some folks hear the Gospel and are born again as sons of God. We’re in His family. I beg the pardon of our learned savant self-styled, but God most assuredly is well pleased with His own kids. His favor does rest on His own sons and daughters.
A learned savant ought to first learn before he attempts to teach. If he doesn’t hunger and thirst enough to put in long hours alone with the Lord and His Word; if he isn’t inclined to learn what he can from those whom the Lord has chosen to teach; if he hasn’t the foggiest about the Greek and Hebrew texts—ai yai yai! What makes such a one believe the Lord has called him to be a teacher?!? Let me answer that. His pride is at the root of the problem. He needs to repent of his sin and seek the Lord’s will for his life.
During this blessed time of the year, let’s get real with the Lord, even as He is real with us. He did give us His one and only Son to die on our behalf. Now that is some gift! He is worth spending our time with, our Bible open and mouth in prayer. It doesn’t matter which Bible of the three I listed you have open either. You won’t go wrong with any of them, dear friends. Let’s worship the Lord and thank Him for His Word, not argue about things we know little to nothing about. Have a blessed Christmas!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 25, 2013
It’s Christmas. I’m Inspired! – Part 2
And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” [Luke 2:13-14, KJV]
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
Anyway, it was Christmas time and this good man wanted to warn his flock about the dangers of “heresy”. If it wasn’t King Jamie’s authorized version, then Paul didn’t use it and Jesus didn’t use it and Peter probably didn’t either! He quoted Luke 2:13-14 as a part of his sermon, using KJV of course. (He was no heretic!) Then he paused momentarily, glanced around at the congregation, and warned them about the “modern” translations.
According to our learned savant, the “modern” translations smuggled in heresies beneath the surface and between the lines. Satan was the mastermind, judging by his impressions, and all the world was in his throes. Not to fear: the learned savant was here! He quoted the NIV and the NASB (see above) to prove his point.
On earth peace, good will toward men. “That’s what King James says. Now looky here at the NIV,” On earth peace among men with whom He is pleased. “And the NASB is just as bad,” On earth peace to those on whom his favor rests. That much alone PROVES the modern versions are heresy, brothers and sisters. God isn’t please with any man. His favor doesn’t rest on any man because all men are sinners!” The room was silent, like the night before Christmas when all through the house…
I personally have no problem with any of the three translations, dear friends. I’ve read each one multiple times and enjoyed doing so every time. I’ve read many others too, but I find these the better choices. Truth be told, I read both Testaments in Hebrew and Greek too. Let me translate my own rendition of Luke 2:13-14 straight from the Greek.
Glory in the highest to God, and upon earth peace among men with whom He is well pleased.
It would be easy enough to translate “with whom He is well pleased” (NIV) by the words “to those on whom His favor rests” (NASB). The words bear both definitions. I don’t want to lose you with too many technicalities, so let’s leave it at that. We will continue this in our next post.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
Anyway, it was Christmas time and this good man wanted to warn his flock about the dangers of “heresy”. If it wasn’t King Jamie’s authorized version, then Paul didn’t use it and Jesus didn’t use it and Peter probably didn’t either! He quoted Luke 2:13-14 as a part of his sermon, using KJV of course. (He was no heretic!) Then he paused momentarily, glanced around at the congregation, and warned them about the “modern” translations.
According to our learned savant, the “modern” translations smuggled in heresies beneath the surface and between the lines. Satan was the mastermind, judging by his impressions, and all the world was in his throes. Not to fear: the learned savant was here! He quoted the NIV and the NASB (see above) to prove his point.
On earth peace, good will toward men. “That’s what King James says. Now looky here at the NIV,” On earth peace among men with whom He is pleased. “And the NASB is just as bad,” On earth peace to those on whom his favor rests. That much alone PROVES the modern versions are heresy, brothers and sisters. God isn’t please with any man. His favor doesn’t rest on any man because all men are sinners!” The room was silent, like the night before Christmas when all through the house…
I personally have no problem with any of the three translations, dear friends. I’ve read each one multiple times and enjoyed doing so every time. I’ve read many others too, but I find these the better choices. Truth be told, I read both Testaments in Hebrew and Greek too. Let me translate my own rendition of Luke 2:13-14 straight from the Greek.
Glory in the highest to God, and upon earth peace among men with whom He is well pleased.
It would be easy enough to translate “with whom He is well pleased” (NIV) by the words “to those on whom His favor rests” (NASB). The words bear both definitions. I don’t want to lose you with too many technicalities, so let’s leave it at that. We will continue this in our next post.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 24, 2013
It’s Christmas. I’m Inspired! – Part 1
And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” [Luke 2:13-14, KJV]
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
As a kid back in the days before the American Revolution (ha ha), I grew up on the King James Version of the Bible (KJV). The first quotation of Luke 2 above was repeated from memory every Christmas, at the reenactment of the Christmas story in my parents’ church. I knew those words by heart, let me tell you. They rang out true and pure, with no adulteration attached. By no means should a single word ever be changed or the syntax be rearranged. Heresy ‘twould be!
It never dawned on me to wonder why it would be heresy. Go figure, why don’cha. I mean, when the Holy Spirit inspired the Christmas story (as well as all the rest of Scripture), there were no English words included! The original manuscripts of the Old Testament were penned in Hebrew, with a small part in Aramaic (a language akin to Hebrew). The New Testament originally was penned in koine Greek (aka the Greek used by the everyday average Joe at the time).
So why, then, by the reckoning of some folks, is it heresy if the Bible is translated differently than old King Jamie authorized? I’ll give you a hint. It begins with a “t” and ends with an “n”, and in-between come the letters “raditio”. Did you decipher the hint okay. You see, it’s much easier on our noggins to learn something when we’re young, taking it at face value because we are taught it by the adults, and nevermore wavering a hairs’ breadth to the right or to the left of it. “Twould be heresy!
Once upon a time, oh, say around 1991-ish, my family and I attended a little startup church in Massachusetts, a couple of blocks from our house. The pastor was a kindly young soul, a self-starter who ignored formal education in favor of knowing it all without having to learn first.
I mean to be kind, honest I do, dear friends. But more harm is done amongst Christians by well-meaning folks who figure the Lord just needs them so desperately to be a teacher of the Bible. It doesn’t occur to them to check and see if the Lord gave them a speaking gift in the first place, or whether He called them to a preaching/teaching ministry. No need to bother the Lord with that. I’ll leave Him in peace and just take care of the matter myself. Uh, it doesn’t work that way! We will continue this in our next post.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
And suddenly there appeared with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom He is pleased.” [Luke 2:13-14, NASB]
Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” [Luke 2:13-14, NIV]
As a kid back in the days before the American Revolution (ha ha), I grew up on the King James Version of the Bible (KJV). The first quotation of Luke 2 above was repeated from memory every Christmas, at the reenactment of the Christmas story in my parents’ church. I knew those words by heart, let me tell you. They rang out true and pure, with no adulteration attached. By no means should a single word ever be changed or the syntax be rearranged. Heresy ‘twould be!
It never dawned on me to wonder why it would be heresy. Go figure, why don’cha. I mean, when the Holy Spirit inspired the Christmas story (as well as all the rest of Scripture), there were no English words included! The original manuscripts of the Old Testament were penned in Hebrew, with a small part in Aramaic (a language akin to Hebrew). The New Testament originally was penned in koine Greek (aka the Greek used by the everyday average Joe at the time).
So why, then, by the reckoning of some folks, is it heresy if the Bible is translated differently than old King Jamie authorized? I’ll give you a hint. It begins with a “t” and ends with an “n”, and in-between come the letters “raditio”. Did you decipher the hint okay. You see, it’s much easier on our noggins to learn something when we’re young, taking it at face value because we are taught it by the adults, and nevermore wavering a hairs’ breadth to the right or to the left of it. “Twould be heresy!
Once upon a time, oh, say around 1991-ish, my family and I attended a little startup church in Massachusetts, a couple of blocks from our house. The pastor was a kindly young soul, a self-starter who ignored formal education in favor of knowing it all without having to learn first.
I mean to be kind, honest I do, dear friends. But more harm is done amongst Christians by well-meaning folks who figure the Lord just needs them so desperately to be a teacher of the Bible. It doesn’t occur to them to check and see if the Lord gave them a speaking gift in the first place, or whether He called them to a preaching/teaching ministry. No need to bother the Lord with that. I’ll leave Him in peace and just take care of the matter myself. Uh, it doesn’t work that way! We will continue this in our next post.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my books Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 23, 2013
Magi Tricks – Part 2
Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?”...After coming into the house they saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell to the ground and worshiped Him. Then, opening their treasures, they presented to Him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh [Matthew 2:1-2, 11].
Because the gifts given to Jesus by the magi were identified as gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh, someone assumed that one magi gave gold, another frankincense, and still a third myrrh, making for three magi. But there could just as well have been two magi, with one giving gold and frankincense and the other myrrh. Or both could have given all three varieties of gifts. Then again, there could have been 317 magi with some giving gold and others giving…
Well, you get the point. The Bible doesn’t tell us how many magi came to visit Jesus, so we cannot possibly know the answer to that question. If we assume we know based upon our own wit and wisdom, we will create traditions to take the place of the Bible. And that can’t be a good thing!
Oh, by the way, we began with the question, “How many magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day?” It’s really a trick question. You see, even if the Bible had recorded that exactly three wise men came to see Jesus, nonetheless the answer is still not “three”.
“Huh?” mumbles a befuddled reader as he shakes his head and looks lost. “Come again, teacher.”
Let’s read some more Scripture and you will understand.
Then Herod secretly called the magi and determined from them the exact time the star appeared…Then when Herod saw that he had been tricked by the magi, he became very enraged, and sent and slew all the male children who were in Bethlehem and all its vicinity, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the magi [Matthew 2:7, 16].
It happened like this. Jesus was born and a special star appeared in the sky. During that period of history all the world was watching for the Jewish Messiah to appear. These Gentile easterners, perhaps from Persia, were stargazing, being astronomers and watching for that special star. They saw it, prepared provisions for the long caravan journey to Jerusalem, then arrived two years later. That is the meaning of Matthew 2:16, as quoted above.
So you see, no magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day. They came two years later! And there was no baby any longer because Jesus was two years old. Aha. Gotcha. Trick questions rule!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Because the gifts given to Jesus by the magi were identified as gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh, someone assumed that one magi gave gold, another frankincense, and still a third myrrh, making for three magi. But there could just as well have been two magi, with one giving gold and frankincense and the other myrrh. Or both could have given all three varieties of gifts. Then again, there could have been 317 magi with some giving gold and others giving…
Well, you get the point. The Bible doesn’t tell us how many magi came to visit Jesus, so we cannot possibly know the answer to that question. If we assume we know based upon our own wit and wisdom, we will create traditions to take the place of the Bible. And that can’t be a good thing!
Oh, by the way, we began with the question, “How many magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day?” It’s really a trick question. You see, even if the Bible had recorded that exactly three wise men came to see Jesus, nonetheless the answer is still not “three”.
“Huh?” mumbles a befuddled reader as he shakes his head and looks lost. “Come again, teacher.”
Let’s read some more Scripture and you will understand.
Then Herod secretly called the magi and determined from them the exact time the star appeared…Then when Herod saw that he had been tricked by the magi, he became very enraged, and sent and slew all the male children who were in Bethlehem and all its vicinity, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the magi [Matthew 2:7, 16].
It happened like this. Jesus was born and a special star appeared in the sky. During that period of history all the world was watching for the Jewish Messiah to appear. These Gentile easterners, perhaps from Persia, were stargazing, being astronomers and watching for that special star. They saw it, prepared provisions for the long caravan journey to Jerusalem, then arrived two years later. That is the meaning of Matthew 2:16, as quoted above.
So you see, no magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day. They came two years later! And there was no baby any longer because Jesus was two years old. Aha. Gotcha. Trick questions rule!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 22, 2013
Magi Tricks – Part 1
Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews?”...After coming into the house they saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell to the ground and worshiped Him. Then, opening their treasures, they presented to Him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh [Matthew 2:1-2, 11].
Let’s have a pop quiz today! How many magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day? Don’t be bashful now. You won’t flunk the course if you get it wrong. Go ahead. Give it your best shot.
“I know! I know! Pick me!” splutters an overly eager reader in the back of the room, his hand bobbing up and down like apples in a bucket of water. Unable to control his excitement, he blurts out the answer without waiting for an
acknowledgment, “Three! There were three wise men!” Gasping for air our learned scholar then sits back down, satisfied he can do no wrong. Then he waits for the accolades to come pouring in from around the world.
Well, I’ll give it to him. The traditional answer is “three magi”. He is right traditionally. But I am a Christian, so I believe the Bible to be the Word of God, not man’s traditions. Which prompts the question, “What does the Bible say about it?” That is Question #2 on the pop quiz. Any takers?
“I know the answer to that one, teacher,” a rather calm and composed fellow announces. His demeanor is in stark contrast to our overly eager brother who answered “three”. “The Bible says that magi or wise men came from the east. How many came is not stated, so we don’t really know how many.” And then he quietly retires to his seat, making no waves and waiting on no fanfare.
Thank you, kind sir. Your answer, both verbally and by example, teaches us truth. There can be no more fitting an answer than to quote the Bible. It is infallible. It is inerrant. It is inspired by the Holy Spirit. My words and yours are, contrariwise, fallible, errant, and inspired by sinners. Nothing could be further from the truth than to proclaim the wit and wisdom of tradition. As Rule #2 for Bible study teaches, The Bible is our sole and final authority in all matters of faith and practice.
We will continue this pop quiz in our next posting. See you then.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Let’s have a pop quiz today! How many magi came to see the baby Jesus on Christmas Day? Don’t be bashful now. You won’t flunk the course if you get it wrong. Go ahead. Give it your best shot.
“I know! I know! Pick me!” splutters an overly eager reader in the back of the room, his hand bobbing up and down like apples in a bucket of water. Unable to control his excitement, he blurts out the answer without waiting for an
acknowledgment, “Three! There were three wise men!” Gasping for air our learned scholar then sits back down, satisfied he can do no wrong. Then he waits for the accolades to come pouring in from around the world.
Well, I’ll give it to him. The traditional answer is “three magi”. He is right traditionally. But I am a Christian, so I believe the Bible to be the Word of God, not man’s traditions. Which prompts the question, “What does the Bible say about it?” That is Question #2 on the pop quiz. Any takers?
“I know the answer to that one, teacher,” a rather calm and composed fellow announces. His demeanor is in stark contrast to our overly eager brother who answered “three”. “The Bible says that magi or wise men came from the east. How many came is not stated, so we don’t really know how many.” And then he quietly retires to his seat, making no waves and waiting on no fanfare.
Thank you, kind sir. Your answer, both verbally and by example, teaches us truth. There can be no more fitting an answer than to quote the Bible. It is infallible. It is inerrant. It is inspired by the Holy Spirit. My words and yours are, contrariwise, fallible, errant, and inspired by sinners. Nothing could be further from the truth than to proclaim the wit and wisdom of tradition. As Rule #2 for Bible study teaches, The Bible is our sole and final authority in all matters of faith and practice.
We will continue this pop quiz in our next posting. See you then.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Numbers: Volume 4 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Does the Bible Contradict Itself? – Part 2
Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes [Proverbs 26:4-5].
Proverbs 26:4 does not have to do with the same concept as in verse 5. The first half of each verse is worded identically, except that the words “Do not” in verse 4 don’t occur in verse 5. But it is the second half of each verse which identifies the subject matter. Let’s vet them and see.
Both verses tell why we should or should not answer a fool according to his folly. The context for verse 4 is that, if we do, you yourself will be just like him. The teaching is simple enough when we consider the context. To be “just like him” we must behave just like him. The context, then, has to do with our behavior. The fool scoffs and scorns, sneers and jeers, and generally acts contemptible. If I respond to him with the same behaviors, I will be just like him. Am I not right?
Now let’s vet verse 5. In this verse we are told to answer a fool according to his folly, the exact opposite of verse 4. This is what leads the gainsayers to bluster windy speeches about Biblical contradictions. However, the second half of the verse furnishes the context, and it is not the same context as we saw in verse 4. Listen to verse 5: or he will be wise in his own eyes. In verse 4 the person who answered the fool in his folly was the subject. In verse 5 the fool is the subject. Very different contexts, you see.
The reason why we MUST answer the fool in his folly is to refute his foolishness. Otherwise he (and many like him) will be emboldened to persevere with their foolishness. We want to disperse the darkness with the light, not turn away and permit the darkness to persevere. So we gently and systematically set forth the errors of the fool’s way, while simultaneously laying out the truth in plain English for all to understand.
Verse 4, then, teaches that we mustn’t respond to the fool in his folly by imitating his folly. He scoffs, but we don’t. He sneers, but we don’t. He jeers, but we don’t. Otherwise we are being fools in their folly along with him! And that doesn’t get rid of the foolishness, does it?
Contrariwise, verse 5 teaches that we must respond to the fool in his folly by being prudent and self-controlled, gentle and humble, yet still bold and adamant with respect to the truth. In that way his folly is exposed, both by noting his lack of logic and by presenting the true logic.
Words to be found in theology textbooks:
• inerrancy: the Bible contains no errors
• infallibility: the Bible is absolutely trustworthy and doesn’t lead us astray
• inspiration: the Holy Spirit (Who is God) led God’s chosen men to write down His Word in such a way that their personalities were included (i.e., they were not mere robots or automatons), but with the Holy Spirit still overseeing the process so that what was written was exactly what the Lord wanted written, no more and no less.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Proverbs 26:4 does not have to do with the same concept as in verse 5. The first half of each verse is worded identically, except that the words “Do not” in verse 4 don’t occur in verse 5. But it is the second half of each verse which identifies the subject matter. Let’s vet them and see.
Both verses tell why we should or should not answer a fool according to his folly. The context for verse 4 is that, if we do, you yourself will be just like him. The teaching is simple enough when we consider the context. To be “just like him” we must behave just like him. The context, then, has to do with our behavior. The fool scoffs and scorns, sneers and jeers, and generally acts contemptible. If I respond to him with the same behaviors, I will be just like him. Am I not right?
Now let’s vet verse 5. In this verse we are told to answer a fool according to his folly, the exact opposite of verse 4. This is what leads the gainsayers to bluster windy speeches about Biblical contradictions. However, the second half of the verse furnishes the context, and it is not the same context as we saw in verse 4. Listen to verse 5: or he will be wise in his own eyes. In verse 4 the person who answered the fool in his folly was the subject. In verse 5 the fool is the subject. Very different contexts, you see.
The reason why we MUST answer the fool in his folly is to refute his foolishness. Otherwise he (and many like him) will be emboldened to persevere with their foolishness. We want to disperse the darkness with the light, not turn away and permit the darkness to persevere. So we gently and systematically set forth the errors of the fool’s way, while simultaneously laying out the truth in plain English for all to understand.
Verse 4, then, teaches that we mustn’t respond to the fool in his folly by imitating his folly. He scoffs, but we don’t. He sneers, but we don’t. He jeers, but we don’t. Otherwise we are being fools in their folly along with him! And that doesn’t get rid of the foolishness, does it?
Contrariwise, verse 5 teaches that we must respond to the fool in his folly by being prudent and self-controlled, gentle and humble, yet still bold and adamant with respect to the truth. In that way his folly is exposed, both by noting his lack of logic and by presenting the true logic.
Words to be found in theology textbooks:
• inerrancy: the Bible contains no errors
• infallibility: the Bible is absolutely trustworthy and doesn’t lead us astray
• inspiration: the Holy Spirit (Who is God) led God’s chosen men to write down His Word in such a way that their personalities were included (i.e., they were not mere robots or automatons), but with the Holy Spirit still overseeing the process so that what was written was exactly what the Lord wanted written, no more and no less.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 20, 2013
Does the Bible Contradict Itself? – Part 1
Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes [Proverbs 26:4-5].
“Looky there! A contradiction in the Bible! I knew it! I knew! The Bible does too contain errors! See! This proves it!”
Such are the rantings of typical worldly gainsayers. They search high and low, devoting themselves exclusively to disproving the Bible. They spend inordinate amounts of time sniffing like an old hound dog for the evidence to “prove” what they’ve already determined to be the case. They are staunch card-carrying activists in the anti-Bible brigade. The motto of this organization is, Don’t confuse me with the facts. I’ve already made up my mind!
But is there really a contradiction in Proverbs 26, between verse 4 and verse 5? A lot is at stake here, doctrines like,
• Biblical inerrancy
• Biblical infallibility
• Holy Spirit inspiration
We mustn’t be slapdash in drawing conclusions based on appearance, dear friends, lest we enjoy having egg on the face! As Rule # 4 for Bible study states: When something in the Bible is not understandable or seems in error, consider that our understanding is more likely in error than is God’s! Amen to that.
“Okay then, teacher,” challenges our local skeptic. “You think you know so much. Explain the contradiction if you can.” And then he sits back on his haunches, a smug look on his face and his chest puffed outward several inches.
Why thank you for the invite, my dear gainsayer. I’ll be glad to…only I didn’t say I could explain everything, only that we mere mortals are more likely in error than is God. Plus I can’t explain the contradiction because there is no contradiction. It is circular reasoning to assert that something nonexistent exists, and then demand that it be explained! Nice try though. It seems to work out there among the worldly folk.
The so-called “contradiction” is merely ostensible, on the surface, superficial. Those who are content to go by first impressions might see one. But to understand the Bible, we must learn the truth of Proverbs 2:4, that we search for the truth as hard as we would search for buried treasure. Half-hearted and perfunctory rituals won’t cut it, dear friends.
Rats. We're out of time today. We will conclude this topic on the morrow. For now let's go have a visit with Jesus.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
“Looky there! A contradiction in the Bible! I knew it! I knew! The Bible does too contain errors! See! This proves it!”
Such are the rantings of typical worldly gainsayers. They search high and low, devoting themselves exclusively to disproving the Bible. They spend inordinate amounts of time sniffing like an old hound dog for the evidence to “prove” what they’ve already determined to be the case. They are staunch card-carrying activists in the anti-Bible brigade. The motto of this organization is, Don’t confuse me with the facts. I’ve already made up my mind!
But is there really a contradiction in Proverbs 26, between verse 4 and verse 5? A lot is at stake here, doctrines like,
• Biblical inerrancy
• Biblical infallibility
• Holy Spirit inspiration
We mustn’t be slapdash in drawing conclusions based on appearance, dear friends, lest we enjoy having egg on the face! As Rule # 4 for Bible study states: When something in the Bible is not understandable or seems in error, consider that our understanding is more likely in error than is God’s! Amen to that.
“Okay then, teacher,” challenges our local skeptic. “You think you know so much. Explain the contradiction if you can.” And then he sits back on his haunches, a smug look on his face and his chest puffed outward several inches.
Why thank you for the invite, my dear gainsayer. I’ll be glad to…only I didn’t say I could explain everything, only that we mere mortals are more likely in error than is God. Plus I can’t explain the contradiction because there is no contradiction. It is circular reasoning to assert that something nonexistent exists, and then demand that it be explained! Nice try though. It seems to work out there among the worldly folk.
The so-called “contradiction” is merely ostensible, on the surface, superficial. Those who are content to go by first impressions might see one. But to understand the Bible, we must learn the truth of Proverbs 2:4, that we search for the truth as hard as we would search for buried treasure. Half-hearted and perfunctory rituals won’t cut it, dear friends.
Rats. We're out of time today. We will conclude this topic on the morrow. For now let's go have a visit with Jesus.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 19, 2013
The Fork in the Road
Give me an undivided heart, that I may fear your name [Psalm 86:11].
I was on my way to be the guest preacher at a church to which I had never before been. In fact I had never been to the town in which it was located. I had never passed that way before.
The cautious and prepared soul who lives within me didn't like taking chances. So I had someone from the church give me directions. Wouldn't you know it? As is often the case when directions are furnished by the locals, vital details are left out under the assumption the newbie knows the territory. Since the locals know their turf so well, it doesn't occur to them those from elsewhere don't!
So here I was, driving down the roads and keeping in step with the directions afforded me. I turned left when the directions said to, and in the same manner I turned right at the prescribed times. I zigged when told to and zagged when that was the direction given.
Who woulda thunk it? Suddenly there was a fork in the road. Do I go left or do I go right? Hmm. Let's see. What do the directions say? Uh, they don't... Ah oh, what to do? I could imitate the king of Babylon on his way to sack Jerusalem. Here's how he resolved being caught on the horns of his dilemma:
For the king of Babylon stands at the parting of the way, at the head of the two ways, to use divination; he shakes the arrows, he consults the household idols, he looks at the liver [Ezekiel 21:21].
So much for that plan. Think I'll go with Plan B. So I hopped out of the car and flagged down the first passerby I saw. "Hey! How do I get to ...?" It worked a bit better than the whole divination scene. That's not my thing.
The Psalmist didn't much care for the divination scene either. He wasn't keen on the idea of facing life's crossroads with a divided heart. The thought of having a fork in the heart's road didn't cut it with him. He wrestled with the angel until daybreak, refusing to surrender. "Give me an undivided heart, O Lord! I must fear Your name, not doubt You and be indecisive at the crossroads."
The words of Psalm 86:11 are embedded in the hard disk of my gray matter. I ponder them anew frequently. I too want an undivided heart to fear the Lord, to fear Him as a loving, but righteous, Heavenly Father. He won't hesitate to take me to the woodshed, should He deem that profitable in promoting my spiritual maturity.
Don't we do the same for our kids? If not, then we are not much suited to be Christian parents. Let's ponder this concept a space and see how the Lord will work in our lives.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Genesis: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
I was on my way to be the guest preacher at a church to which I had never before been. In fact I had never been to the town in which it was located. I had never passed that way before.
The cautious and prepared soul who lives within me didn't like taking chances. So I had someone from the church give me directions. Wouldn't you know it? As is often the case when directions are furnished by the locals, vital details are left out under the assumption the newbie knows the territory. Since the locals know their turf so well, it doesn't occur to them those from elsewhere don't!
So here I was, driving down the roads and keeping in step with the directions afforded me. I turned left when the directions said to, and in the same manner I turned right at the prescribed times. I zigged when told to and zagged when that was the direction given.
Who woulda thunk it? Suddenly there was a fork in the road. Do I go left or do I go right? Hmm. Let's see. What do the directions say? Uh, they don't... Ah oh, what to do? I could imitate the king of Babylon on his way to sack Jerusalem. Here's how he resolved being caught on the horns of his dilemma:
For the king of Babylon stands at the parting of the way, at the head of the two ways, to use divination; he shakes the arrows, he consults the household idols, he looks at the liver [Ezekiel 21:21].
So much for that plan. Think I'll go with Plan B. So I hopped out of the car and flagged down the first passerby I saw. "Hey! How do I get to ...?" It worked a bit better than the whole divination scene. That's not my thing.
The Psalmist didn't much care for the divination scene either. He wasn't keen on the idea of facing life's crossroads with a divided heart. The thought of having a fork in the heart's road didn't cut it with him. He wrestled with the angel until daybreak, refusing to surrender. "Give me an undivided heart, O Lord! I must fear Your name, not doubt You and be indecisive at the crossroads."
The words of Psalm 86:11 are embedded in the hard disk of my gray matter. I ponder them anew frequently. I too want an undivided heart to fear the Lord, to fear Him as a loving, but righteous, Heavenly Father. He won't hesitate to take me to the woodshed, should He deem that profitable in promoting my spiritual maturity.
Don't we do the same for our kids? If not, then we are not much suited to be Christian parents. Let's ponder this concept a space and see how the Lord will work in our lives.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Genesis: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
December 18, 2013
Too Heavenly Minded – Part 2
For I long to see you so that I may impart some spiritual gift to you, that you may be established; that is, that I may be encouraged together with you while among you, each of us by the other’s faith, both yours and mine [Romans 1:11-12].
Sadly, but most readers come upon a new chapter and believe the subject changes. And they quote a verse to prove a point, as if the verse takes place in a vacuum. That is, they take the words out of context. Rule #1 for Bible study states, a text without a context is a pretext. Those are vital words to live by, dear people.
Should we read verse 11 as if it occurs in a vacuum, we might very well correlate the “spiritual gift” here with Paul’s topic in 1 Corinthians 12 and 14. In Corinthians Paul discusses the spiritual gifts imparted by the Holy Spirit to each Christian, the purpose of which is to equip the Christian with ability to perform a specific ministry to which the Lord calls the Christian. But that topic is not even remotely discussed by Paul in Romans 1!
Verse 12 makes this obvious by defining the term “spiritual gift”, as it is used in Romans 1. Listen: that is, that I may be encouraged together with you while among you, each of us by the other’s faith, both yours and mine. See! The “spiritual gift” here consists of being “encouraged…by the other’s faith”. The phrase “spiritual gift” in Romans 1:11, then, refers to a blessing which results when we Christians see the Lord working in each of our lives. It occurs when we have true fellowship together.
Biblical fellowship (aka koinonia) always has the Lord and His Word as its axis. If we sit around the church fellowship hall, filling our faces with food and discussing the football game or the best sales at the mall—dear friends, that has nothing to do with fellowship! Just because it occurs in the church building does not make it “spiritual”.
Paul’s “spiritual gift” in Romans 1:11 has to do with sharing how the Lord is working in my life. It has to do with sharing a Bible verse which impacted me. It has to do with the Lord and His Word. When we get to that point in our churches, then true Biblical fellowship takes place…at which time all of us receive a “spiritual gift”.
Isn’t that wonderful? Wouldn’t it be great to go to church in order to receive suchlike spiritual gifts? Amen to that, brother! Amen to that, sister! Let’s do it, okay?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Genesis: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Sadly, but most readers come upon a new chapter and believe the subject changes. And they quote a verse to prove a point, as if the verse takes place in a vacuum. That is, they take the words out of context. Rule #1 for Bible study states, a text without a context is a pretext. Those are vital words to live by, dear people.
Should we read verse 11 as if it occurs in a vacuum, we might very well correlate the “spiritual gift” here with Paul’s topic in 1 Corinthians 12 and 14. In Corinthians Paul discusses the spiritual gifts imparted by the Holy Spirit to each Christian, the purpose of which is to equip the Christian with ability to perform a specific ministry to which the Lord calls the Christian. But that topic is not even remotely discussed by Paul in Romans 1!
Verse 12 makes this obvious by defining the term “spiritual gift”, as it is used in Romans 1. Listen: that is, that I may be encouraged together with you while among you, each of us by the other’s faith, both yours and mine. See! The “spiritual gift” here consists of being “encouraged…by the other’s faith”. The phrase “spiritual gift” in Romans 1:11, then, refers to a blessing which results when we Christians see the Lord working in each of our lives. It occurs when we have true fellowship together.
Biblical fellowship (aka koinonia) always has the Lord and His Word as its axis. If we sit around the church fellowship hall, filling our faces with food and discussing the football game or the best sales at the mall—dear friends, that has nothing to do with fellowship! Just because it occurs in the church building does not make it “spiritual”.
Paul’s “spiritual gift” in Romans 1:11 has to do with sharing how the Lord is working in my life. It has to do with sharing a Bible verse which impacted me. It has to do with the Lord and His Word. When we get to that point in our churches, then true Biblical fellowship takes place…at which time all of us receive a “spiritual gift”.
Isn’t that wonderful? Wouldn’t it be great to go to church in order to receive suchlike spiritual gifts? Amen to that, brother! Amen to that, sister! Let’s do it, okay?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Genesis: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. For more info please visit these sites to purchase my books:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
