M.E. Brines's Blog
March 26, 2020
Corona Virus Chaos
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) states between twelve thousand and sixty-one thousand people die from the flu every year in the US. In 2016 37,461 people died from automobile crashes—that's more than 102 a day. These deaths happen every year and nobody issues panic orders to shut down the entire economy, yet as of March 23, only 16,496 have died of COVID-19 worldwide. They've put the whole world under house arrest for something that hasn't even killed half the number of people that die in automobile crashes each year in just the US.
We're told by the same media we all derided a month ago for peddling "fake news" that COVID is different—that we'd better panic because we're all gonna get it and eighty million of us are going to die—and we believe them. They quote "scientific" studies that show COVID has this huge fatality rate—but are those accurate? Who can say?
Doctor Wolfgang Wodarg can. He states that 14% of flu is typically caused by the corona virus so this disease is nothing new. Further he stated in this interview (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitica... ) that because the test kits were scarce, and because they only test people who go to the hospital with very bad cases, that of course the mortality rate is skewed because the people who don't get all that sick are never tested. They only test the few people who are so sick they took themselves to the hospital. The thousands more who stay home and shrug it off over the weekend with chicken soup and NyQuil never get tested, so the results show a massive mortality rate because they never test anybody who isn't deathly ill.
In Italy, the nation with the highest death rate, 99.2% of the dead already had another disease when they died and the vast majority were seventy years-old or older. (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/in... ) They don't die of COVID; they die of pneumonia, kidney failure, or other complications.
So why, if this virus is just a variant of the usual flu, has it become a worldwide panic? Because "Never let a crisis go to waste" has become "let's create our own crisis."
The-powers-that-be need a panic. The last few years there have been major and increasing worldwide protests and demonstrations against Globalism. Brexit, protests against the immigrant crisis in both Europe and the US, the Yellow Jackets in France, and major protests in Hong Kong, Spain, Greece and Italy threaten the status quo. Nearly a quarter of the world is in turmoil. (https://www.foxnews.com/world/one-in-... )The-powers-that-be need something to end the resistance, and a global pandemic is perfect. The pro-democracy protesters in China vanished as soon as this virus scare hit the streets.
Here in the US, Democrats have dreamed for years of an economic collapse that prevents Trump's re-election—and here's their chance. A stock market crash followed by a Greater Depression is perfect to drive people into dependence on The-Powers-that-be. Massive unemployment and a collapse of the Middle Class into poverty will neuter opposition to Globalism. Quarantines and curfews prevent protests and rallies, and anyone who flouts them is a "public danger" that can be hauled off and held indefinitely in "quarantine" without trial. When granted emergency dictatorial powers for the "health emergency," several Democrat mayors have already issued orders to ban and confiscate firearms in their towns—something they could never have gotten past the city council otherwise.
The big New York banks have proposed putting the Federal Reserve, a private corporation they own, in charge of the US Treasury, printing trillions of dollars backed by nothing to bail out whoever they choose—the power to reward their crooked friends and destroy the enemies of Globalism.
The Justice Department has already asked Congress (privately, of course) for the ability to have judges detain people indefinitely without trial. Pandemic Patriot Act 2.0 is just around the corner with further restrictions on what liberties we have left after the last one, which didn't do a thing to end the "War on Terror." (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitica... )
In France, you can't even leave your home now without written authorization. As of last Friday, March 20, here in America, the "land of the free," various government entities and corporations are issuing travel papers to their employees so they won't be arrested during a potential corona virus curfew. Why? Because they know a Pandemic Patriot Act regime is coming where "show us your papers" will become just as ominous as it was in those old 1940's war movies. (https://www.zerohedge.com/political/t... )
There is even talk of implanting computer chips inside us (for our own good, of course) to better track who has the virus, all the better to control us with. (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wo... )
Who benefits from all this? The Mainstream Press benefits from the increase in their ratings as panicked populations huddle around their screens for the latest bulletin. The medical community gets billion-dollar grants for research and treatments. The crisis management people finally get to use their fancy toys. Everybody wins!
The malaria drug that treats COVID has been known to be effective against the virus since 2005! (More proof the Corona virus is nothing new.) Yet the public just now finds out about the drug last week, months after the disease became front-page news. Why? Because Big Pharma kept it quiet, hoping for (and getting) huge government grants to study and treat the virus. They can't make a fortune off some out-of-patent- protection generic malaria drug, but you can bet when The-powers-that-be require all of us to get tested, probably multiple times, that the drug companies are going to need dump trucks to haul their profits to the bank.
We're all being played like puppets. Welcome to the same old New World Order, now on steroids.
Trump has recently avoided several attempts by the CIA to foment a Third World War against Iran, Syria, and China. Sooner or later he'll either give in or be replaced, just as JFK was for not cooperating. This whole fake epidemic is good practice for the last two steps in establishing their Global Government. First, a world war to crush the last few nations outside their control—ever wonder why the media always bashes China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea? They're supposedly a threat to us. But if you check the real statistics, eighty percent of world military spending today is by the US and its allies—a greater percentage of world military power than the Nazis had even at the height of World War II. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of... ) We have troops in more countries today than they ever did. And we overthrow the governments of any of our allies who "stray" just like the Nazis did. (Not surprising since the CIA took in four thousand Nazi intelligence operators at its founding after World War II, but I digress.)
After that final world war, The-powers-that-be will use the same methods they used in this fake pandemic when they introduce their fake extraterrestrial alien disclosure "threat" to justify a one-world government—with them in total control, naturally. If you want to see the evidence of this plan for yourself, read The Report from Iron Mountain (their own plans for a global government leaked in 1964) (https://www.amazon.com/Report-Iron-Mo... ) or my book, The Red Pill. (https://www.smashwords.com/books/view... )
Or go back and believe what your Masters want you to believe. Pay no attention to the man behind that curtain pulling those levers. He's not really there. Just make sure your papers are in order next time you try to go outside.
We're told by the same media we all derided a month ago for peddling "fake news" that COVID is different—that we'd better panic because we're all gonna get it and eighty million of us are going to die—and we believe them. They quote "scientific" studies that show COVID has this huge fatality rate—but are those accurate? Who can say?
Doctor Wolfgang Wodarg can. He states that 14% of flu is typically caused by the corona virus so this disease is nothing new. Further he stated in this interview (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitica... ) that because the test kits were scarce, and because they only test people who go to the hospital with very bad cases, that of course the mortality rate is skewed because the people who don't get all that sick are never tested. They only test the few people who are so sick they took themselves to the hospital. The thousands more who stay home and shrug it off over the weekend with chicken soup and NyQuil never get tested, so the results show a massive mortality rate because they never test anybody who isn't deathly ill.
In Italy, the nation with the highest death rate, 99.2% of the dead already had another disease when they died and the vast majority were seventy years-old or older. (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/in... ) They don't die of COVID; they die of pneumonia, kidney failure, or other complications.
So why, if this virus is just a variant of the usual flu, has it become a worldwide panic? Because "Never let a crisis go to waste" has become "let's create our own crisis."
The-powers-that-be need a panic. The last few years there have been major and increasing worldwide protests and demonstrations against Globalism. Brexit, protests against the immigrant crisis in both Europe and the US, the Yellow Jackets in France, and major protests in Hong Kong, Spain, Greece and Italy threaten the status quo. Nearly a quarter of the world is in turmoil. (https://www.foxnews.com/world/one-in-... )The-powers-that-be need something to end the resistance, and a global pandemic is perfect. The pro-democracy protesters in China vanished as soon as this virus scare hit the streets.
Here in the US, Democrats have dreamed for years of an economic collapse that prevents Trump's re-election—and here's their chance. A stock market crash followed by a Greater Depression is perfect to drive people into dependence on The-Powers-that-be. Massive unemployment and a collapse of the Middle Class into poverty will neuter opposition to Globalism. Quarantines and curfews prevent protests and rallies, and anyone who flouts them is a "public danger" that can be hauled off and held indefinitely in "quarantine" without trial. When granted emergency dictatorial powers for the "health emergency," several Democrat mayors have already issued orders to ban and confiscate firearms in their towns—something they could never have gotten past the city council otherwise.
The big New York banks have proposed putting the Federal Reserve, a private corporation they own, in charge of the US Treasury, printing trillions of dollars backed by nothing to bail out whoever they choose—the power to reward their crooked friends and destroy the enemies of Globalism.
The Justice Department has already asked Congress (privately, of course) for the ability to have judges detain people indefinitely without trial. Pandemic Patriot Act 2.0 is just around the corner with further restrictions on what liberties we have left after the last one, which didn't do a thing to end the "War on Terror." (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitica... )
In France, you can't even leave your home now without written authorization. As of last Friday, March 20, here in America, the "land of the free," various government entities and corporations are issuing travel papers to their employees so they won't be arrested during a potential corona virus curfew. Why? Because they know a Pandemic Patriot Act regime is coming where "show us your papers" will become just as ominous as it was in those old 1940's war movies. (https://www.zerohedge.com/political/t... )
There is even talk of implanting computer chips inside us (for our own good, of course) to better track who has the virus, all the better to control us with. (https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wo... )
Who benefits from all this? The Mainstream Press benefits from the increase in their ratings as panicked populations huddle around their screens for the latest bulletin. The medical community gets billion-dollar grants for research and treatments. The crisis management people finally get to use their fancy toys. Everybody wins!
The malaria drug that treats COVID has been known to be effective against the virus since 2005! (More proof the Corona virus is nothing new.) Yet the public just now finds out about the drug last week, months after the disease became front-page news. Why? Because Big Pharma kept it quiet, hoping for (and getting) huge government grants to study and treat the virus. They can't make a fortune off some out-of-patent- protection generic malaria drug, but you can bet when The-powers-that-be require all of us to get tested, probably multiple times, that the drug companies are going to need dump trucks to haul their profits to the bank.
We're all being played like puppets. Welcome to the same old New World Order, now on steroids.
Trump has recently avoided several attempts by the CIA to foment a Third World War against Iran, Syria, and China. Sooner or later he'll either give in or be replaced, just as JFK was for not cooperating. This whole fake epidemic is good practice for the last two steps in establishing their Global Government. First, a world war to crush the last few nations outside their control—ever wonder why the media always bashes China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea? They're supposedly a threat to us. But if you check the real statistics, eighty percent of world military spending today is by the US and its allies—a greater percentage of world military power than the Nazis had even at the height of World War II. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of... ) We have troops in more countries today than they ever did. And we overthrow the governments of any of our allies who "stray" just like the Nazis did. (Not surprising since the CIA took in four thousand Nazi intelligence operators at its founding after World War II, but I digress.)
After that final world war, The-powers-that-be will use the same methods they used in this fake pandemic when they introduce their fake extraterrestrial alien disclosure "threat" to justify a one-world government—with them in total control, naturally. If you want to see the evidence of this plan for yourself, read The Report from Iron Mountain (their own plans for a global government leaked in 1964) (https://www.amazon.com/Report-Iron-Mo... ) or my book, The Red Pill. (https://www.smashwords.com/books/view... )
Or go back and believe what your Masters want you to believe. Pay no attention to the man behind that curtain pulling those levers. He's not really there. Just make sure your papers are in order next time you try to go outside.
January 30, 2020
Review of The Man in the High Castle
This is a review of the TV show The Man in the High Castle. SPOILERS
Based on the book by Phillip K. Dick, the show went four seasons on Amazon Prime. I initially enjoyed it because if you've ever read any of my books, the show followed my standard plot formula: Nazi villains, alternate history, weird technology, and lots of drama.
The writing wasn't predictable. Each episode generally left me surprised and wanting to find out how the characters got out of their new predicament. I especially enjoyed how the character Juliana wasn't just some feminist bad-ass that kicks butt because she's a strong social justice icon. The first episode established she was skilled in judo, so when she throws a Nazi agent off a bridge a couple episodes later, it's totally believable. Her trauma and remorse then for having just killed someone was also very realistic and believable. Given her experiences, that she later gradually developed into a female Jason Bourne was equally believable.
To someone like myself, who grew up in the 1960s, the show was more like a horror flick—a terrifying vision of my country under Nazi occupation. I think the writers did an excellent job of showing what America would have been like.
The show did an exceptional job of dressing the sets. The only thing I noticed that was out of place or unrealistic was the size of Hitler's office. While large, the set didn't compare to his real supermarket-sized palatial office. Also in the show he had a picture of President Hindenburg on the wall when the real Hitler had one of Henry Ford. Hitler hated Hindenburg but adored Ford's book about eugenics.
I found it interesting that Occupied California didn't look like anything had been fixed or updated since 1945. Everything is dirty, backward, and broken. The streets are filthy and the non-Japanese live in poverty. In contrast, Nazi-occupied America is clean, organized, and prosperous. They showed without telling that while the Japanese have exploited and plundered their zone, the Nazis rebuilt their half. Except for an ominous complete lack of Blacks on the streets, the Reich looks like the real 1960s America.
The show vaguely follows the plot of the book, at least for the first two seasons. The only weird thing is that while there are Jews in the story, the show makes little use of them. Frank, a secular Jew, comes to religious faith in the end with a small group of Jews hiding out in the Neutral Zone. But the show didn't really make much of them. One would think given history that more use would have been made of the dramatic potential of their faith under the ultimate persecution.
The only people in the show who were family-oriented were the Nazis. Other than Juliana, the other characters didn't really have close family relationships and hers were strained. This seems strange in a world torn apart where you'd need support from your family—who else is there to count on? In real life, the Nazi Party was not family oriented. The Party was supreme. You swore total allegiance to Hitler and only him. Children were routinely encouraged to spy on their parents and turn them in for deviation. I don't think the writers understood totalitarianism. More likely, they wanted to showcase the idea that anyone who is conservative, works hard, appreciates order, and is family focused is just a white supremacist Nazi. These days social justice is the theme of all "entertainment" and a big budget production like this isn't going to get funded, especially by Amazon, without kowtowing to it. Even so, the first two seasons were exceptional.
But the third season seemed as if they switched writers. Or perhaps a memo came down from on high to ramp up the propaganda. All of a sudden two characters turned out to be homosexual who heretofore had displayed no evidence of it. Ed, Frank's friend, who was shown earlier as being a secret admirer of Frank's girlfriend Juliana, turns out to be a closeted homosexual. This makes no sense given the fact he'd been attracted to Juliana, as shown in the show. She met Frank first, or Ed would have tried to date her, but he left her alone because she was his best friend's girl. That's from the book. But it makes no sense if he's homosexual, which the character in the book is not. It's as if the producers suddenly realized there were no homosexuals in the show and had to retcon some in.
The similar lesbian subplot is also unnecessary. The character had been previously shown as a slutty Bohemian filmmaker. Absent current political correctness, she could have continued as such and had basically the same effect on the plot through a relationship with the married advertising executive, rather than his wife. The lesbian angle was only included to show that Nazis persecuted homosexuals, therefore anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly endorse the LGBTQZ agenda therefore is also a Nazi.
Late in the third season they bumped the Progressive propaganda up another notch by introducing the Black Communist Resistance. The regular resistance had been fighting the Japanese for eighteen years since the end of the war with no success. The BCR, led by a woman, then undertakes a campaign of terrorism that in a matter of months convinces the Japanese to abandon California and evacuate all the way back to Japan. Obviously the Patriarchy can only be brought down by minorities, especially if led by women. Go Antifa!
The Japanese remark of their determination, "They fought for 400 years and will fight 400 more if necessary." I wasn't aware Blacks fought for their freedom for 400 years. They were originally sold into slavery by other Blacks in Africa. For the next 400 years, except for Nat Turner, there were no major slave uprisings. Other than a few regiments of freed slaves—organized and outfitted by White abolitionists—Blacks got their freedom handed to them after half a million Whites died fighting for it in the Civil War.
To really understand the magnitude of the propaganda, one needs only to compare the treatment of Blacks in the show with Jews. Jews have been persecuted for thousands of years. The Nazis weren't the first to practice genocide on them. The show could have mentioned that for millennia their persecutors have come and gone yet the Jews continue. But no mention is made of this in the show—because of course, social justice warriors are anti-Semitic, Jew-hating Israel bashers and only included them in the show because of the source material and only as far as the source material went.
The show makes a big deal out of films smuggled from alternate realities where the Axis lost World War II and their effect on the occupied peoples. But at the end of season three when the characters mass produce one showing the Allies winning the war, season four begins with the regular non-Black resistance immediately being defeated and the films being captured and burned, the message of the show being that the only thing that can defeat the racist White-supremacist Patriarchy is minorities, because the regular resistance is certainly ineffectual—too many toxic White males, I suppose.
In the final episode, with a Nazi invasion of Communist-liberated California imminent, one of the Blacks suggests fighting under the old American flag, the idea being that the invading Nazi army, made up primarily of Americans now, many of whom were old enough to remember what it was like before the war, would switch sides. But the other Blacks refuse because "everybody knows" that America was no good for Blacks. Apparently, the writers thought the Jim Crow laws were some kind of Federal statute, not an actual violation of the existing 14th Amendment. Those laws only existed in a few Democrat controlled ex-Confederate states, but that doesn't matter because "Stars-and-Stripes-bad" is the only point they want to make here, even if the suggestion to fight under the old flag has merit even if that was true. Who cares if Blacks had it bad in the old America if rallying under its flag gets the invading armies to join you instead of wiping you out? Because America bad, that's why.
Another complaint I have is that while there are some male supporting characters, all the show's important "good" characters are female. Juliana, her sister, the lesbian filmmaker, Smith's wife, his "woke" older daughter, the head of the BCR, even the Japanese Crown Princess who wants peace—they're all female. Meanwhile, all the villains are male except for one kick-ass Gestapo agent who beat the crap out of and would have killed Liam except for Juliana Bourne saving his mediocre male candy-ass. Male supporting "heroes" include a pornographer, a black marketeer, a smarmy art dealer, and the Man in the High Castle himself who turns collaborator until his "heroic" wife is able to kill herself to give him a spine. The only decent, honorable, trustworthy, self-sacrificing real male heroes are Gay Ed and his Brokeback Mountain cowboy lover.
In the end, Reichsmarshall Smith is betrayed by his own wife who for some inexplicable reason after driving him to sell out his country and comrades to become a Nazi collaborator in the first place, suddenly grows a conscience about his plans for a Final Solution to the Black problem. He became a monster to save his family, but in the end his son is murdered by the Party. His oldest daughter rejects Nazism and him. His youngest becomes a Nazi fanatic. His own wife betrays him and is killed. But just as Smith is about to commit suicide out of remorse, Juliana shows up and shoots him—can't have the Evil Patriarch atoning for his sins. Nope. He's got to die at the hand of the Strong Female Protagonist literally a half-second before he shoots himself.
Then at the very end of the episode, for some utterly inexplicable reason the portal opens on its own and a mob of people shamble through it from other realities. Who are these people? Why are they here? We see The Man in the High Castle heading into them as if looking for his dead wife. Are these people who died fighting the Nazis? But the show already established that the portal opens to alternative realities, not the Afterlife. Are these people invaders from other realities where the Nazis were defeated, coming to put an end to them here? No, because they're all in civilian clothes and shambling around with no apparent purpose or direction. The show's ending makes no sense.
The show established that the portal opens onto an infinite number of other realities where anything that could have happened did. Himmler planned to use it to invade and conquer the other realities until it was discovered that you can only enter a reality if no living version of you already exists there. A much better ending to the show would have been if the portal opened up and Allied troops from another realities pushed through to liberate the world from the Nazis. The army would have been made of all the multiple millions of people murdered by the Nazis in this reality, an ironic consequence of their genocidal policies. This ending would have been especially ironic if we saw Smith's son from the alternate 1964 in his US Marine Corps uniform with them. The producers could have even had Juliana be the catalyst for this. She had escaped to an alternate reality 1964 until Smith sent an assassin to kill her. What if instead of then returning to her home reality to try to assassinate one of the most powerful political leaders in the world singlehandedly, she had instead stayed where she was and convinced an alternate reality President Kennedy to intervene by liberating her reality of the Nazis?
Nah. That would have meant presenting a "racist White-supremacist Patriarchial" 1960s America as something good.
* * *
If you're looking for good stories about Nazi alternate history, try my seven volume Agarthi Conspiracy series, which starts with The Fist of God: https://www.amazon.com/Fist-God-Agart...
Based on the book by Phillip K. Dick, the show went four seasons on Amazon Prime. I initially enjoyed it because if you've ever read any of my books, the show followed my standard plot formula: Nazi villains, alternate history, weird technology, and lots of drama.
The writing wasn't predictable. Each episode generally left me surprised and wanting to find out how the characters got out of their new predicament. I especially enjoyed how the character Juliana wasn't just some feminist bad-ass that kicks butt because she's a strong social justice icon. The first episode established she was skilled in judo, so when she throws a Nazi agent off a bridge a couple episodes later, it's totally believable. Her trauma and remorse then for having just killed someone was also very realistic and believable. Given her experiences, that she later gradually developed into a female Jason Bourne was equally believable.
To someone like myself, who grew up in the 1960s, the show was more like a horror flick—a terrifying vision of my country under Nazi occupation. I think the writers did an excellent job of showing what America would have been like.
The show did an exceptional job of dressing the sets. The only thing I noticed that was out of place or unrealistic was the size of Hitler's office. While large, the set didn't compare to his real supermarket-sized palatial office. Also in the show he had a picture of President Hindenburg on the wall when the real Hitler had one of Henry Ford. Hitler hated Hindenburg but adored Ford's book about eugenics.
I found it interesting that Occupied California didn't look like anything had been fixed or updated since 1945. Everything is dirty, backward, and broken. The streets are filthy and the non-Japanese live in poverty. In contrast, Nazi-occupied America is clean, organized, and prosperous. They showed without telling that while the Japanese have exploited and plundered their zone, the Nazis rebuilt their half. Except for an ominous complete lack of Blacks on the streets, the Reich looks like the real 1960s America.
The show vaguely follows the plot of the book, at least for the first two seasons. The only weird thing is that while there are Jews in the story, the show makes little use of them. Frank, a secular Jew, comes to religious faith in the end with a small group of Jews hiding out in the Neutral Zone. But the show didn't really make much of them. One would think given history that more use would have been made of the dramatic potential of their faith under the ultimate persecution.
The only people in the show who were family-oriented were the Nazis. Other than Juliana, the other characters didn't really have close family relationships and hers were strained. This seems strange in a world torn apart where you'd need support from your family—who else is there to count on? In real life, the Nazi Party was not family oriented. The Party was supreme. You swore total allegiance to Hitler and only him. Children were routinely encouraged to spy on their parents and turn them in for deviation. I don't think the writers understood totalitarianism. More likely, they wanted to showcase the idea that anyone who is conservative, works hard, appreciates order, and is family focused is just a white supremacist Nazi. These days social justice is the theme of all "entertainment" and a big budget production like this isn't going to get funded, especially by Amazon, without kowtowing to it. Even so, the first two seasons were exceptional.
But the third season seemed as if they switched writers. Or perhaps a memo came down from on high to ramp up the propaganda. All of a sudden two characters turned out to be homosexual who heretofore had displayed no evidence of it. Ed, Frank's friend, who was shown earlier as being a secret admirer of Frank's girlfriend Juliana, turns out to be a closeted homosexual. This makes no sense given the fact he'd been attracted to Juliana, as shown in the show. She met Frank first, or Ed would have tried to date her, but he left her alone because she was his best friend's girl. That's from the book. But it makes no sense if he's homosexual, which the character in the book is not. It's as if the producers suddenly realized there were no homosexuals in the show and had to retcon some in.
The similar lesbian subplot is also unnecessary. The character had been previously shown as a slutty Bohemian filmmaker. Absent current political correctness, she could have continued as such and had basically the same effect on the plot through a relationship with the married advertising executive, rather than his wife. The lesbian angle was only included to show that Nazis persecuted homosexuals, therefore anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly endorse the LGBTQZ agenda therefore is also a Nazi.
Late in the third season they bumped the Progressive propaganda up another notch by introducing the Black Communist Resistance. The regular resistance had been fighting the Japanese for eighteen years since the end of the war with no success. The BCR, led by a woman, then undertakes a campaign of terrorism that in a matter of months convinces the Japanese to abandon California and evacuate all the way back to Japan. Obviously the Patriarchy can only be brought down by minorities, especially if led by women. Go Antifa!
The Japanese remark of their determination, "They fought for 400 years and will fight 400 more if necessary." I wasn't aware Blacks fought for their freedom for 400 years. They were originally sold into slavery by other Blacks in Africa. For the next 400 years, except for Nat Turner, there were no major slave uprisings. Other than a few regiments of freed slaves—organized and outfitted by White abolitionists—Blacks got their freedom handed to them after half a million Whites died fighting for it in the Civil War.
To really understand the magnitude of the propaganda, one needs only to compare the treatment of Blacks in the show with Jews. Jews have been persecuted for thousands of years. The Nazis weren't the first to practice genocide on them. The show could have mentioned that for millennia their persecutors have come and gone yet the Jews continue. But no mention is made of this in the show—because of course, social justice warriors are anti-Semitic, Jew-hating Israel bashers and only included them in the show because of the source material and only as far as the source material went.
The show makes a big deal out of films smuggled from alternate realities where the Axis lost World War II and their effect on the occupied peoples. But at the end of season three when the characters mass produce one showing the Allies winning the war, season four begins with the regular non-Black resistance immediately being defeated and the films being captured and burned, the message of the show being that the only thing that can defeat the racist White-supremacist Patriarchy is minorities, because the regular resistance is certainly ineffectual—too many toxic White males, I suppose.
In the final episode, with a Nazi invasion of Communist-liberated California imminent, one of the Blacks suggests fighting under the old American flag, the idea being that the invading Nazi army, made up primarily of Americans now, many of whom were old enough to remember what it was like before the war, would switch sides. But the other Blacks refuse because "everybody knows" that America was no good for Blacks. Apparently, the writers thought the Jim Crow laws were some kind of Federal statute, not an actual violation of the existing 14th Amendment. Those laws only existed in a few Democrat controlled ex-Confederate states, but that doesn't matter because "Stars-and-Stripes-bad" is the only point they want to make here, even if the suggestion to fight under the old flag has merit even if that was true. Who cares if Blacks had it bad in the old America if rallying under its flag gets the invading armies to join you instead of wiping you out? Because America bad, that's why.
Another complaint I have is that while there are some male supporting characters, all the show's important "good" characters are female. Juliana, her sister, the lesbian filmmaker, Smith's wife, his "woke" older daughter, the head of the BCR, even the Japanese Crown Princess who wants peace—they're all female. Meanwhile, all the villains are male except for one kick-ass Gestapo agent who beat the crap out of and would have killed Liam except for Juliana Bourne saving his mediocre male candy-ass. Male supporting "heroes" include a pornographer, a black marketeer, a smarmy art dealer, and the Man in the High Castle himself who turns collaborator until his "heroic" wife is able to kill herself to give him a spine. The only decent, honorable, trustworthy, self-sacrificing real male heroes are Gay Ed and his Brokeback Mountain cowboy lover.
In the end, Reichsmarshall Smith is betrayed by his own wife who for some inexplicable reason after driving him to sell out his country and comrades to become a Nazi collaborator in the first place, suddenly grows a conscience about his plans for a Final Solution to the Black problem. He became a monster to save his family, but in the end his son is murdered by the Party. His oldest daughter rejects Nazism and him. His youngest becomes a Nazi fanatic. His own wife betrays him and is killed. But just as Smith is about to commit suicide out of remorse, Juliana shows up and shoots him—can't have the Evil Patriarch atoning for his sins. Nope. He's got to die at the hand of the Strong Female Protagonist literally a half-second before he shoots himself.
Then at the very end of the episode, for some utterly inexplicable reason the portal opens on its own and a mob of people shamble through it from other realities. Who are these people? Why are they here? We see The Man in the High Castle heading into them as if looking for his dead wife. Are these people who died fighting the Nazis? But the show already established that the portal opens to alternative realities, not the Afterlife. Are these people invaders from other realities where the Nazis were defeated, coming to put an end to them here? No, because they're all in civilian clothes and shambling around with no apparent purpose or direction. The show's ending makes no sense.
The show established that the portal opens onto an infinite number of other realities where anything that could have happened did. Himmler planned to use it to invade and conquer the other realities until it was discovered that you can only enter a reality if no living version of you already exists there. A much better ending to the show would have been if the portal opened up and Allied troops from another realities pushed through to liberate the world from the Nazis. The army would have been made of all the multiple millions of people murdered by the Nazis in this reality, an ironic consequence of their genocidal policies. This ending would have been especially ironic if we saw Smith's son from the alternate 1964 in his US Marine Corps uniform with them. The producers could have even had Juliana be the catalyst for this. She had escaped to an alternate reality 1964 until Smith sent an assassin to kill her. What if instead of then returning to her home reality to try to assassinate one of the most powerful political leaders in the world singlehandedly, she had instead stayed where she was and convinced an alternate reality President Kennedy to intervene by liberating her reality of the Nazis?
Nah. That would have meant presenting a "racist White-supremacist Patriarchial" 1960s America as something good.
* * *
If you're looking for good stories about Nazi alternate history, try my seven volume Agarthi Conspiracy series, which starts with The Fist of God: https://www.amazon.com/Fist-God-Agart...
January 16, 2020
Artists Gotta Art
Art comes in many forms: paintings, sculpture, music, poetry, literature, plays, and more. Artists make art because it's what they do. The common stereotype of the tortured artist driven to create is based on reality. I know for myself, if I go too long without being creative I get restive, even depressive. Artists gotta art.
Every artist dreams of doing his art as their full-time job. They yearn to be creating in their "studio" day after day, undisturbed by the sordid cares of this world, but this doesn't usually work out. The other common stereotype of artists is the starving artist, also based in reality. Van Gogh worked construction jobs to buy his paints. Picasso burned a lot of his early works for heat during the winter.
A few artists make it bigStephen King comes to mindbut most don't. If you're an artist you need to create but you also need to eat. You can go through life frustrated and hungry because you can't make a living with your art, or you can be reasonable.
I worked a dozen years trying to make writing my career. I got a lot of books published and some did okay. I got published in a few magazines, an anthology, and won the 2012 Crow Award, but I only made enough money to live off it for about a year. I made the mistake of quitting my day job and had to start over.
A lot of actors drift along from job to job as waitresses, shop clerks, and such waiting to "be discovered" all the while never putting any effort into their day job beyond making enough for the rent. They end up frustrated and angry because they don't "make it." From experience, I think artists ought to assume they're not going to make it. History proves most won't. An artist ought to put effort into their "day" job and be content with creating their art on their time off. Artists gotta art but they have to eat too.
Being content with your art, and not being driven in a futile manner to despair from failure to make a living from it will avoid much misery and depression. And who knows? Maybe you will be successful? But in the meantime you won't be depressed and hungry, and end up cutting off your ear and shooting yourself like Van Gogh.
Every artist dreams of doing his art as their full-time job. They yearn to be creating in their "studio" day after day, undisturbed by the sordid cares of this world, but this doesn't usually work out. The other common stereotype of artists is the starving artist, also based in reality. Van Gogh worked construction jobs to buy his paints. Picasso burned a lot of his early works for heat during the winter.
A few artists make it bigStephen King comes to mindbut most don't. If you're an artist you need to create but you also need to eat. You can go through life frustrated and hungry because you can't make a living with your art, or you can be reasonable.
I worked a dozen years trying to make writing my career. I got a lot of books published and some did okay. I got published in a few magazines, an anthology, and won the 2012 Crow Award, but I only made enough money to live off it for about a year. I made the mistake of quitting my day job and had to start over.
A lot of actors drift along from job to job as waitresses, shop clerks, and such waiting to "be discovered" all the while never putting any effort into their day job beyond making enough for the rent. They end up frustrated and angry because they don't "make it." From experience, I think artists ought to assume they're not going to make it. History proves most won't. An artist ought to put effort into their "day" job and be content with creating their art on their time off. Artists gotta art but they have to eat too.
Being content with your art, and not being driven in a futile manner to despair from failure to make a living from it will avoid much misery and depression. And who knows? Maybe you will be successful? But in the meantime you won't be depressed and hungry, and end up cutting off your ear and shooting yourself like Van Gogh.
Artists Gotta Art
Art comes in many forms: paintings, sculpture, music, poetry, literature, plays, and more. Artists make art because it's what they do. The common stereotype of the tortured artist driven to create is based on reality. I know for myself, if I go too long without being creative I get restive, even depressive. Artists gotta art.
Every artist dreams of doing his art as their full-time job. They yearn to be creating in their "studio" day after day, undisturbed by the sordid cares of this world, but this doesn't usually work out. The other common stereotype of artists is the starving artist, also based in reality. Van Gogh worked construction jobs to buy his paints. Picasso burned a lot of his early works for heat during the winter.
A few artists make it bigStephen King comes to mindbut most don't. If you're an artist you need to create but you also need to eat. You can go through life frustrated and hungry because you can't make a living with your art, or you can be reasonable.
I worked a dozen years trying to make writing my career. I got a lot of books published and some did okay. I got published in a few magazines, an anthology, and won the 2012 Crow Award, but I only made enough money to live off it for about a year. I made the mistake of quitting my day job and had to start over.
A lot of actors drift along from job to job as waitresses, shop clerks, and such waiting to "be discovered" all the while never putting any effort into their day job beyond making enough for the rent. They end up frustrated and angry because they don't "make it." From experience, I think artists ought to assume they're not going to make it. History proves most won't. An artist ought to put effort into their "day" job and be content with creating their art on their time off. Artists gotta art but they have to eat too.
Being content with your art, and not being driven in a futile manner to despair from failure to make a living from it will avoid much misery and depression. And who knows? Maybe you will be successful? But in the meantime you won't be depressed and hungry, and end up cutting off your ear and shooting yourself like Van Gogh.
Every artist dreams of doing his art as their full-time job. They yearn to be creating in their "studio" day after day, undisturbed by the sordid cares of this world, but this doesn't usually work out. The other common stereotype of artists is the starving artist, also based in reality. Van Gogh worked construction jobs to buy his paints. Picasso burned a lot of his early works for heat during the winter.
A few artists make it bigStephen King comes to mindbut most don't. If you're an artist you need to create but you also need to eat. You can go through life frustrated and hungry because you can't make a living with your art, or you can be reasonable.
I worked a dozen years trying to make writing my career. I got a lot of books published and some did okay. I got published in a few magazines, an anthology, and won the 2012 Crow Award, but I only made enough money to live off it for about a year. I made the mistake of quitting my day job and had to start over.
A lot of actors drift along from job to job as waitresses, shop clerks, and such waiting to "be discovered" all the while never putting any effort into their day job beyond making enough for the rent. They end up frustrated and angry because they don't "make it." From experience, I think artists ought to assume they're not going to make it. History proves most won't. An artist ought to put effort into their "day" job and be content with creating their art on their time off. Artists gotta art but they have to eat too.
Being content with your art, and not being driven in a futile manner to despair from failure to make a living from it will avoid much misery and depression. And who knows? Maybe you will be successful? But in the meantime you won't be depressed and hungry, and end up cutting off your ear and shooting yourself like Van Gogh.
December 5, 2019
Jesus' Birthday
Our current Capitalist Consumerist Saturnalia Celebration, the one commonly known as "Christmas," has nothing to do with Christ and never has.
First off, Christ wasn't born on December 25th. While the Bible doesn't state exactly when he was born, it does give quite a few details we can use to sleuth out the truth. Luke 2:7-8 mentions shepherds watching their flocks the night of his birth. This isn't going to happen in Judea in December, a notoriously cold and rainy time of the year. Shepherds would have moved their flocks into winter quarters by then.
The occasion for Mary and Joseph being in Bethlehem was a Roman census. Again, they're not going to hold a census that requires everyone to travel to their city of birth in mid-winter when travel is difficult and the rutted tracks that pass for roads in that part of the Empire are virtually impassable.
In Luke chapter one, we learn of the conception of John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin. His father is serving in the temple "during the course of Abia" (June 13-19 of that year) and gets a visit from an angel who tells him his wife is going to conceive a son. Given he was away from home on his temple service, conception would have occurred afterwards about the end of June, leading to a birth around the following March. Scripture gives the difference in age between the cousins as around six months, therefore Jesus would have been born sometime in September that same year, probably during the Feast of Tabernacles, which fell on 16 September that year.
There is no historical evidence Christmas was celebrated prior to the Emperor Constantine's hijacking of Christianity and merging it with the established Imperial State Church to create the Roman Catholic Church in the Fourth Century. They chose December 25th because of the existing pagan Saturnalia celebration of the same time of year. The Saturnalia celebrated the god Saturn with several weeks of feasting, gift giving and continual partying—pretty much a description of how we celebrate the Christmas "holiday" season.
Christmas is a celebration of greed, lust, envy, gluttony, and sloth. There's really no Christ in Christmas.
* * *
If you're looking for the truth about the Rapture and End Times, read my Bible commentary, Jesus is Only Coming Twice: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/149...
First off, Christ wasn't born on December 25th. While the Bible doesn't state exactly when he was born, it does give quite a few details we can use to sleuth out the truth. Luke 2:7-8 mentions shepherds watching their flocks the night of his birth. This isn't going to happen in Judea in December, a notoriously cold and rainy time of the year. Shepherds would have moved their flocks into winter quarters by then.
The occasion for Mary and Joseph being in Bethlehem was a Roman census. Again, they're not going to hold a census that requires everyone to travel to their city of birth in mid-winter when travel is difficult and the rutted tracks that pass for roads in that part of the Empire are virtually impassable.
In Luke chapter one, we learn of the conception of John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin. His father is serving in the temple "during the course of Abia" (June 13-19 of that year) and gets a visit from an angel who tells him his wife is going to conceive a son. Given he was away from home on his temple service, conception would have occurred afterwards about the end of June, leading to a birth around the following March. Scripture gives the difference in age between the cousins as around six months, therefore Jesus would have been born sometime in September that same year, probably during the Feast of Tabernacles, which fell on 16 September that year.
There is no historical evidence Christmas was celebrated prior to the Emperor Constantine's hijacking of Christianity and merging it with the established Imperial State Church to create the Roman Catholic Church in the Fourth Century. They chose December 25th because of the existing pagan Saturnalia celebration of the same time of year. The Saturnalia celebrated the god Saturn with several weeks of feasting, gift giving and continual partying—pretty much a description of how we celebrate the Christmas "holiday" season.
Christmas is a celebration of greed, lust, envy, gluttony, and sloth. There's really no Christ in Christmas.
* * *
If you're looking for the truth about the Rapture and End Times, read my Bible commentary, Jesus is Only Coming Twice: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/149...
November 13, 2019
A Quote from Socrates
Let us reflect in another way, and we shall see that there is great reason to hope that death is a good, for one of two things: – either death is a state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness, or, as men say, there is a change and migration of the soul from this world to another. Now if you suppose that there is no consciousness, but a sleep like the sleep of him who is undisturbed even by the sight of dreams, death will be an unspeakable gain. For if a person were to select the night in which his sleep was undisturbed even by dreams, and were to compare with this the other days and nights of his life, and then were to tell us how many days and nights he had passed in the course of his life better and more pleasantly than this one, I think that any man, I will not say a private man, but even the great king, will not find many such days or nights, when compared with the others. Now if death is like this, I say that to die is gain; for eternity is then only a single night.
But if death is the journey to another place, and there, as men say, all the dead are, what good, O my friends and judges, can be greater than this? If indeed when the pilgrim arrives in the world below, he is delivered from the professors of justice in this world, and finds the true judges who are said to give judgment there, Minos and Rhadamanthus and Aeacus and Triptolemus, and other sons of God who were righteous in their own life, that pilgrimage will be worth making. What would not a man give if he might converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer? Nay, if this be true, let me die again and again. I, too, shall have a wonderful interest in a place where I can converse with Palamedes, and Ajax the son of Telamon, and other heroes of old, who have suffered death through an unjust judgment; and there will be no small pleasure, as I think, in comparing my own sufferings with theirs.
Above all, I shall be able to continue my search into true and false knowledge; as in this world, so also in that; I shall find out who is wise, and who pretends to be wise, and is not. What would not a man give, O judges, to be able to examine the leader of the great Trojan expedition; or Odysseus or Sisyphus, or numberless others, men and women too! What infinite delight would there be in conversing with them and asking them questions! For in that world they do not put a man to death for this; certainly not. For besides being happier in that world than in this, they will be immortal, if what is said is true.
But if death is the journey to another place, and there, as men say, all the dead are, what good, O my friends and judges, can be greater than this? If indeed when the pilgrim arrives in the world below, he is delivered from the professors of justice in this world, and finds the true judges who are said to give judgment there, Minos and Rhadamanthus and Aeacus and Triptolemus, and other sons of God who were righteous in their own life, that pilgrimage will be worth making. What would not a man give if he might converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer? Nay, if this be true, let me die again and again. I, too, shall have a wonderful interest in a place where I can converse with Palamedes, and Ajax the son of Telamon, and other heroes of old, who have suffered death through an unjust judgment; and there will be no small pleasure, as I think, in comparing my own sufferings with theirs.
Above all, I shall be able to continue my search into true and false knowledge; as in this world, so also in that; I shall find out who is wise, and who pretends to be wise, and is not. What would not a man give, O judges, to be able to examine the leader of the great Trojan expedition; or Odysseus or Sisyphus, or numberless others, men and women too! What infinite delight would there be in conversing with them and asking them questions! For in that world they do not put a man to death for this; certainly not. For besides being happier in that world than in this, they will be immortal, if what is said is true.
November 23, 2018
The Origin of the New World Order
Confederate Brigadier General Albert Pike rose to become head of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, being the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry from 1859. He retained that position until his death in 1891. In 1869, he was also a top leader in the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. He reorganized the Masons, introducing new degrees of initiation and transforming Masonry from the quasi-occultic fraternal society it was in George Washington’s day to a Luciferian cult dedicated to re-establishing the one-world Satanic government that existed at the time of the Tower of Babel.
Involved in the Italian struggle for Unification, Pike corresponded with Italian revolutionaries. In a letter to Cardinal Mazzini dated August 15, 1871 he outlined the Masonic-Illuminati plan for world conquest in a series of three world wars. The first between European powers designed to destroy the Russian monarchy and establish an atheistic communist regime, the second to destroy the power of “Nazism” and bring about the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, and the third to destroy that Jewish state and Islam in a mutually genocidal war. The ultimate goal of these wars was to achieve a one-world government under Masonic-Illuminati control. In order to carry out this plan they created the Progressive movement in the US to become the nucleus of the one-world government rulers, and they established and supported both the Communists and Nazis to provide a directed opposition to push the world in the direction of their desired goal. The Nazis might have been established by the Vril Society, but the Illuminati controlled and directed the Vril to do it.
You might wonder why they set up a Jewish state in one war just to destroy it in a second. Under the Hegelian dialectical philosophy underlying Marxist thought, when two ideas clash (the thesis and antithesis) their struggle transforms societal thinking and results in the acceptance of a new idea known as the synthesis. (Whether this is actually true is irrelevant. Marxists believe it is and act accordingly.) The occultists saw that throughout history many groups have tried to establish a one-world empire and failed. Neither Alexander, Caesar, Charles the Great, nor Napoleon managed it. Society threw up too much opposition. To achieve their goal they planned to use the Hegelian dialectic to modify society by passing it through three major calamities—not just to eliminate opposition to their one-world government, but to make it something people desire and clamor for.
The interesting thing about this letter is it lays out the history of the world for the next century and more before it happened. The First World War ended in an atheistic Russia and the emergence of the US as a world power. The second in the destruction of Nazi power and the effective control of the entire Western world by the Progressive-controlled US-NATO alliance. Only the Eastern Bloc remained free of control. We can see the run up to the third war in the current headlines as we face off with the nations that remain outside the New World Order—Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, etc. The current “Axis of Evil.” World War Three will leave them defeated and the Illuminati-controlled Western powers with no effective opposition. Then they’ll move into their final stage…
“… the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion...We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”
Some people say the letter is a fake. But the letter was first published in The Mystery of Freemasonry by Cardinal Caro Rodriguez in 1925. This is after the First World War the letter mentions but well before World War Two, the establishment of the State of Israel and our current Middle Eastern strife. The letter also mentions Nazism and fascism by name, even though they hadn’t been invented in 1871. If it were a fake worked up in 1925 for Rodriguez’ book, why would the writer bother to mention the Nazis? In 1925 the Nazi party was illegal. Hitler had only been released from prison at the end of 1924 and was banned from public speaking. He hadn’t even published Mein Kampf yet. They were unknown outside of Germany and not that well-known there. Some other boogeyman would have been much more believable. This, combined with the yet to be fulfilled prophecies that unfolded exactly as laid out indicates the letter was authentic—the actual plans of conspiring revolutionaries lat led to the New World Order as we now know it.
The letter mentioned the Nazis in 1871 because the writer knew the plan was to create such a group and use it to start the Second World War. The conspirators financed the Communist revolution in Russia and the takeover of Germany by the Nazis. Anyone who’s done much research into conspiracy “theory” has seen the links between the major New York banks, and Rockefeller's Standard Oil with both the Nazi regime and the Bolshevist communists. We come full circle with the integration of Nazi military intelligence under General Gelen into the CIA after the Second World War with Operation Paperclip. Many of the same high-ranking European nobility who were pro-Nazi before the war (Like Prince Bernard of the Netherlands) became avid supporters of New World Order afterwards. In the 1950s the Bilderberg meetings were full of ex-Nazis hobnobbing with Progressive political activists and corporate bigwigs. Fifty years later they still are.
The New World Order was predicted in this 1871 letter because the Masonic Illuminati have been working for a hundred and fifty years to create it. To this end they have fomented revolution, overthrown governments, and initiated both world wars in order to guide society to their desired Luciferian servitude.
If you’d like to read more about conspiracy reality (no mere theories here) my novels and books are available on Amazon and at www.smashwords.com. Just look for author name M.E. Brines. For more information about this letter visit www.threeworldwars.com.
Involved in the Italian struggle for Unification, Pike corresponded with Italian revolutionaries. In a letter to Cardinal Mazzini dated August 15, 1871 he outlined the Masonic-Illuminati plan for world conquest in a series of three world wars. The first between European powers designed to destroy the Russian monarchy and establish an atheistic communist regime, the second to destroy the power of “Nazism” and bring about the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, and the third to destroy that Jewish state and Islam in a mutually genocidal war. The ultimate goal of these wars was to achieve a one-world government under Masonic-Illuminati control. In order to carry out this plan they created the Progressive movement in the US to become the nucleus of the one-world government rulers, and they established and supported both the Communists and Nazis to provide a directed opposition to push the world in the direction of their desired goal. The Nazis might have been established by the Vril Society, but the Illuminati controlled and directed the Vril to do it.
You might wonder why they set up a Jewish state in one war just to destroy it in a second. Under the Hegelian dialectical philosophy underlying Marxist thought, when two ideas clash (the thesis and antithesis) their struggle transforms societal thinking and results in the acceptance of a new idea known as the synthesis. (Whether this is actually true is irrelevant. Marxists believe it is and act accordingly.) The occultists saw that throughout history many groups have tried to establish a one-world empire and failed. Neither Alexander, Caesar, Charles the Great, nor Napoleon managed it. Society threw up too much opposition. To achieve their goal they planned to use the Hegelian dialectic to modify society by passing it through three major calamities—not just to eliminate opposition to their one-world government, but to make it something people desire and clamor for.
The interesting thing about this letter is it lays out the history of the world for the next century and more before it happened. The First World War ended in an atheistic Russia and the emergence of the US as a world power. The second in the destruction of Nazi power and the effective control of the entire Western world by the Progressive-controlled US-NATO alliance. Only the Eastern Bloc remained free of control. We can see the run up to the third war in the current headlines as we face off with the nations that remain outside the New World Order—Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, etc. The current “Axis of Evil.” World War Three will leave them defeated and the Illuminati-controlled Western powers with no effective opposition. Then they’ll move into their final stage…
“… the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion...We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”
Some people say the letter is a fake. But the letter was first published in The Mystery of Freemasonry by Cardinal Caro Rodriguez in 1925. This is after the First World War the letter mentions but well before World War Two, the establishment of the State of Israel and our current Middle Eastern strife. The letter also mentions Nazism and fascism by name, even though they hadn’t been invented in 1871. If it were a fake worked up in 1925 for Rodriguez’ book, why would the writer bother to mention the Nazis? In 1925 the Nazi party was illegal. Hitler had only been released from prison at the end of 1924 and was banned from public speaking. He hadn’t even published Mein Kampf yet. They were unknown outside of Germany and not that well-known there. Some other boogeyman would have been much more believable. This, combined with the yet to be fulfilled prophecies that unfolded exactly as laid out indicates the letter was authentic—the actual plans of conspiring revolutionaries lat led to the New World Order as we now know it.
The letter mentioned the Nazis in 1871 because the writer knew the plan was to create such a group and use it to start the Second World War. The conspirators financed the Communist revolution in Russia and the takeover of Germany by the Nazis. Anyone who’s done much research into conspiracy “theory” has seen the links between the major New York banks, and Rockefeller's Standard Oil with both the Nazi regime and the Bolshevist communists. We come full circle with the integration of Nazi military intelligence under General Gelen into the CIA after the Second World War with Operation Paperclip. Many of the same high-ranking European nobility who were pro-Nazi before the war (Like Prince Bernard of the Netherlands) became avid supporters of New World Order afterwards. In the 1950s the Bilderberg meetings were full of ex-Nazis hobnobbing with Progressive political activists and corporate bigwigs. Fifty years later they still are.
The New World Order was predicted in this 1871 letter because the Masonic Illuminati have been working for a hundred and fifty years to create it. To this end they have fomented revolution, overthrown governments, and initiated both world wars in order to guide society to their desired Luciferian servitude.
If you’d like to read more about conspiracy reality (no mere theories here) my novels and books are available on Amazon and at www.smashwords.com. Just look for author name M.E. Brines. For more information about this letter visit www.threeworldwars.com.
November 16, 2018
The Muffins of the Damned
I went to a party just the other day and some wretched muffins lay displayed in a steel bowl amid the rest of the snacks. Their tops didn’t even reach the edge of the colorful cupcake papers wrapped around them. Lumpy and vaguely orange, I figured, given the season, they were pumpkin. So, of course I had to try one.
Big mistake. They did taste vaguely like pumpkin. Bland, they were both chewy and crumbling, a difficult feat in a baked good. Unidentifiable lumps could have been nuts or raisins but weren’t. They were so bad, I saw a guy who must have weighed over three-hundred pounds sidle up to the buffet with a predatory gleam in his eye, nibble at a “muffin,” then make a face and head for the trash without swallowing.
Later when the party was breaking up, I saw a blue-haired Millennial chick transferring the muffins from the bowl to a paper plate, I assumed so she could take her bowl home but leave her contribution for others to “enjoy.” She had a whole plateful left. Nothing remained of the other snacks, except for a couple of bowls of chip fragments and the usual veggie platter debris. (I think crudités is actually French for “leave out a couple of hours and then throw away.”)
I gestured at the muffins. “Did you make those?”
She smiled. “Why, yes. Gluten, dairy, and sugar free Vegan pumpkin muffins. My own recipe!”
Thinking that eating unseasoned pumpkin straight out of the can with a spoon would have been more tasty, I replied, “Amazing!” I made myself scarce before she could ask what I found so remarkable.
Later I reflected on the incident. I think those muffins are a good metaphor for what political correctness has done to our culture. It’s become bland, tasteless, and rather unpleasant with no definite texture, crumbling around the edges and held together by the most flimsy of wrappers—bright, and gaily decorated, but with no real substance. Lacking a discernible flavor, it seems to stand for nothing, neither sweet, nor salty, having an unidentifiable texture that can be described many ways but never as good. The only reason it’s like this is because someone in authority decreed “it’s better this way,” that somehow just as our traditional gluten, dairy, and sugar are all “bad,” so is Western Civilization even though for thousands of years people sought those very things and considered it suffering to go without. And just as at the party, nobody these days says anything against this view. They avoid speaking the truth because that just leads to trouble. And so politically correct movies bomb, the LGBT-oriented novels and feminist comic books don’t sell, and progressive TV shows have poor ratings—just like everybody ate up all the pizza rolls and flautas before the fat guy even got to the buffet, leaving him a selection of picked-over veggies and those sad muffins. (Last I saw him, he was nibbling a cucumber slice.) Hungry people will eat what’s available, even if they don’t care for it. The Politically Correct Approved Solution to get people to eat what’s been declared good for them at a buffet is to only allow stuff that’s Vegan-friendly and peanut-free.
And that’s why Google and Facebook and YouTube are so aggressive about blocking Politically Incorrect content—because nobody’s going to eat the muffins of the damned if there’s anything else available. And that’s why Hollywood keeps remaking movies. They have to replace all the old “classics” like The Terminator, Ocean’s Eleven and Ghostbusters with gluten-free, sugar-free, no fat, all PC versions.
Welcome to pop culture Hell.
If you’d like to see my contributions to real culture, my novels and books are available on Amazon and at www.smashwords.com. Just look for author name M.E. Brines.
Big mistake. They did taste vaguely like pumpkin. Bland, they were both chewy and crumbling, a difficult feat in a baked good. Unidentifiable lumps could have been nuts or raisins but weren’t. They were so bad, I saw a guy who must have weighed over three-hundred pounds sidle up to the buffet with a predatory gleam in his eye, nibble at a “muffin,” then make a face and head for the trash without swallowing.
Later when the party was breaking up, I saw a blue-haired Millennial chick transferring the muffins from the bowl to a paper plate, I assumed so she could take her bowl home but leave her contribution for others to “enjoy.” She had a whole plateful left. Nothing remained of the other snacks, except for a couple of bowls of chip fragments and the usual veggie platter debris. (I think crudités is actually French for “leave out a couple of hours and then throw away.”)
I gestured at the muffins. “Did you make those?”
She smiled. “Why, yes. Gluten, dairy, and sugar free Vegan pumpkin muffins. My own recipe!”
Thinking that eating unseasoned pumpkin straight out of the can with a spoon would have been more tasty, I replied, “Amazing!” I made myself scarce before she could ask what I found so remarkable.
Later I reflected on the incident. I think those muffins are a good metaphor for what political correctness has done to our culture. It’s become bland, tasteless, and rather unpleasant with no definite texture, crumbling around the edges and held together by the most flimsy of wrappers—bright, and gaily decorated, but with no real substance. Lacking a discernible flavor, it seems to stand for nothing, neither sweet, nor salty, having an unidentifiable texture that can be described many ways but never as good. The only reason it’s like this is because someone in authority decreed “it’s better this way,” that somehow just as our traditional gluten, dairy, and sugar are all “bad,” so is Western Civilization even though for thousands of years people sought those very things and considered it suffering to go without. And just as at the party, nobody these days says anything against this view. They avoid speaking the truth because that just leads to trouble. And so politically correct movies bomb, the LGBT-oriented novels and feminist comic books don’t sell, and progressive TV shows have poor ratings—just like everybody ate up all the pizza rolls and flautas before the fat guy even got to the buffet, leaving him a selection of picked-over veggies and those sad muffins. (Last I saw him, he was nibbling a cucumber slice.) Hungry people will eat what’s available, even if they don’t care for it. The Politically Correct Approved Solution to get people to eat what’s been declared good for them at a buffet is to only allow stuff that’s Vegan-friendly and peanut-free.
And that’s why Google and Facebook and YouTube are so aggressive about blocking Politically Incorrect content—because nobody’s going to eat the muffins of the damned if there’s anything else available. And that’s why Hollywood keeps remaking movies. They have to replace all the old “classics” like The Terminator, Ocean’s Eleven and Ghostbusters with gluten-free, sugar-free, no fat, all PC versions.
Welcome to pop culture Hell.
If you’d like to see my contributions to real culture, my novels and books are available on Amazon and at www.smashwords.com. Just look for author name M.E. Brines.
January 11, 2018
Why the world is full of pain and suffering
Suppose you were God and wanted to create a perfect world, one without crime, pain, and suffering, a world in which no one lies or murders or steals? Obviously you can do this—you’re God. You’re omnipotent. You can do anything. But how do you go about it?
Why not just create people to be like that? You’re omnipotent; just make people who never make bad choices, who always love each other and never practice aggression such as theft or murder.
But that means your people have no choice or free will. They’re not really people—they’re puppets. They don’t really love each other. They just go through the motions. They don’t have any choice. If you program a computer to “love” you—is it really love?
No. It’s just a really creepy program. To truly love requires the possibility of not loving. This requires free will. Perfect people have to have free will.
But this creates an even less desirable “perfect” world. Free will means people can make choices and that means some of them will make bad choices. This is how we got in the mess our current world is in. So how do we fix that? How about we just make it so our people won’t make bad choices?
Free will with no bad choices allowed requires instant punishment. When I hear people suggest God should just step in—like superman—every time somebody acts out, I don’t think they quite understand what that means. Doing this to create a perfect world—one entirely lacking pain, crime and sorrow—requires a lot more than what Superman does in the comics. There he only acts against felons—robbers, thieves, murderers, and such, and only after they commit the crime. To prevent all crime, and pain, and sorrow God would have to punish every bad act, everything from shoplifting, to lying, being disrespectful to parents, down to guys who leave the toilet seat up.
Many atheists say they can’t believe in a loving God who allows the terrible things that happen in our world. But to make God a cosmic cop who punishes every infraction instantly—and even preemptively, not just in a “you’ll regret this after you die” sort of way—the punishment must occur before the crime to prevent others from harm. Therefore, you end up with a God who quite literally would be striking people dead for thinking about committing murder. A world where an omnipotent deity zaps you constantly for merely thinking out of line isn’t a perfect world. It’s more like a perfect Hell. But it is required if you require your omnipotent deity to serve as a universal cosmic conscience.
So how can we create that perfect world where everyone chooses to do good? We need a world filled with people with free will, who could choose to do wrong, but don’t.
This is how you get there. It takes several thousand years, but it works:
First, you create your world and fill it with people with free will. This is not the “perfect” world, just the first step on the way there.
Then, you let your people know you exist, that you created them, and they need to choose to submit to you and your rules and to treat others as they would like to be treated. (The Golden Rule.) This could be done through direct revelation, the sending of messengers (prophets), or even, say, going yourself as one of the people—the “Son” of God. The Bible says it is a record of God’s numerous such communications with Mankind in just this way.
Third, you step back and allow your creations to choose. Some of them will choose badly and do terrible things. Others will choose wisely. But you must let them choose for themselves. Because many of those people are going to make the wrong choices, the history of your world is going to be like ours, a litany of war, atrocity, crime and suffering. You can’t have heroes without villains and you can’t have free will without the possibility of bad choices. You can’t step in and “make everything right” with miracles—at least not on a regular and systematic basis. People have to choose freely, and live with the consequences of their choices so you can see which of your creations in your cosmic kindergarten “doesn’t play well with others.”
Step Five: After a few thousand years when you’ve “processed” enough people to stock your future perfect world, you wind up the imperfect version—Armageddon.
Finally, you create another world. Then you resurrect all the dead from the previous world—the cooperative ones people your new, now perfect world. The rest get their own world—one where there is no God, no rules, where they can do exactly what they want and prey upon each other to their black hearts’ content. Everybody wins.
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful. And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. (Revelation 21:1-8)
* * *
For more information read…
The Bible - Dead Letter or Message from Your Creator? http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/...
Revolutionary Discipleship http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/...
Jesus is Only Coming Twice. https://www.smashwords.com/books/view...
Why not just create people to be like that? You’re omnipotent; just make people who never make bad choices, who always love each other and never practice aggression such as theft or murder.
But that means your people have no choice or free will. They’re not really people—they’re puppets. They don’t really love each other. They just go through the motions. They don’t have any choice. If you program a computer to “love” you—is it really love?
No. It’s just a really creepy program. To truly love requires the possibility of not loving. This requires free will. Perfect people have to have free will.
But this creates an even less desirable “perfect” world. Free will means people can make choices and that means some of them will make bad choices. This is how we got in the mess our current world is in. So how do we fix that? How about we just make it so our people won’t make bad choices?
Free will with no bad choices allowed requires instant punishment. When I hear people suggest God should just step in—like superman—every time somebody acts out, I don’t think they quite understand what that means. Doing this to create a perfect world—one entirely lacking pain, crime and sorrow—requires a lot more than what Superman does in the comics. There he only acts against felons—robbers, thieves, murderers, and such, and only after they commit the crime. To prevent all crime, and pain, and sorrow God would have to punish every bad act, everything from shoplifting, to lying, being disrespectful to parents, down to guys who leave the toilet seat up.
Many atheists say they can’t believe in a loving God who allows the terrible things that happen in our world. But to make God a cosmic cop who punishes every infraction instantly—and even preemptively, not just in a “you’ll regret this after you die” sort of way—the punishment must occur before the crime to prevent others from harm. Therefore, you end up with a God who quite literally would be striking people dead for thinking about committing murder. A world where an omnipotent deity zaps you constantly for merely thinking out of line isn’t a perfect world. It’s more like a perfect Hell. But it is required if you require your omnipotent deity to serve as a universal cosmic conscience.
So how can we create that perfect world where everyone chooses to do good? We need a world filled with people with free will, who could choose to do wrong, but don’t.
This is how you get there. It takes several thousand years, but it works:
First, you create your world and fill it with people with free will. This is not the “perfect” world, just the first step on the way there.
Then, you let your people know you exist, that you created them, and they need to choose to submit to you and your rules and to treat others as they would like to be treated. (The Golden Rule.) This could be done through direct revelation, the sending of messengers (prophets), or even, say, going yourself as one of the people—the “Son” of God. The Bible says it is a record of God’s numerous such communications with Mankind in just this way.
Third, you step back and allow your creations to choose. Some of them will choose badly and do terrible things. Others will choose wisely. But you must let them choose for themselves. Because many of those people are going to make the wrong choices, the history of your world is going to be like ours, a litany of war, atrocity, crime and suffering. You can’t have heroes without villains and you can’t have free will without the possibility of bad choices. You can’t step in and “make everything right” with miracles—at least not on a regular and systematic basis. People have to choose freely, and live with the consequences of their choices so you can see which of your creations in your cosmic kindergarten “doesn’t play well with others.”
Step Five: After a few thousand years when you’ve “processed” enough people to stock your future perfect world, you wind up the imperfect version—Armageddon.
Finally, you create another world. Then you resurrect all the dead from the previous world—the cooperative ones people your new, now perfect world. The rest get their own world—one where there is no God, no rules, where they can do exactly what they want and prey upon each other to their black hearts’ content. Everybody wins.
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful. And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. (Revelation 21:1-8)
* * *
For more information read…
The Bible - Dead Letter or Message from Your Creator? http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/...
Revolutionary Discipleship http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/...
Jesus is Only Coming Twice. https://www.smashwords.com/books/view...
January 4, 2018
Do Christians, Jews and Muslims all Worship the same God?
Islam does NOT worship the same god as Christians and Jews. Allah is nothing like Jehovah. Christ taught a God of love. Mohamed taught one of domination. Where the Bible declares the equality of all mankind including women:
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)
The Koran declares the servants of Allah are more evolved than other humans and that unbelievers are hardly better than animals. Women are seen as inferior, even to infidel men.
Koran 3: 110 Ye are the best of peoples evolved for mankind enjoining what is right forbidding what is wrong and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith it were best for them; among them are some who have faith but most of them are perverted transgressors.
And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like livestock; rather, they are more astray. It is they who are the heedless. Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve (Koran 8:55) They are the worst of creatures. (Koran 98:6) …he is like the dog; whether you pet him or scold him, he pants. Such is the example of people who reject our proofs. (Koran 7:176)
The Koran provides in chapter 4, verse 34 the proper way to deal with disobedient wives, which includes neglect and beatings, while the Bible advises:
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it… So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. … let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself…. (Ephesians 5:25-33)
Islam considers Jesus as merely a prophet and not even the greatest of those (that’s Mohamed) while Christianity is entirely based on the idea Jesus is the actual divine Son of God. Those two beliefs are mutually incompatible and if you have any doubts on this, the Koran specifically states many times that Allah has no son and such a thing is not even possible. (Koran chapter 6:101, 17:111, 18:4-6, 23:91 etc.) Thus the Koran specifically attacks the cardinal belief of Christianity, not just once but many times. Islam and Christianity are not compatible and do not worship the same God.
Comparing their accounts of the Apocalypse demonstrates the most revealing proof of the actual relationship of Islam to Christianity.
In Islam they await a messiah, the Mahdi, who will someday return, unite the world under his rule for seven years, leading the Faithful in a Holy War against the Jews and Christians who will be eradicated from the Earth, after which will dawn a new age of peace and prosperity. Without a close examination, this appears at first glance to be rather similar to the End Time events predicted by the Christian Apostle John in the biblical book of Revelation. But the Devil’s in the details – literally.
Biblical prophecy indicates at the end of time a spiritual leader will arise and unite the world under his personal dictatorial rule. He will then proceed to persecute Jews and Christians for seven years, martyring them by the millions. So far this sounds exactly like the account in the Koran. The difference is the identification of this world ruler. In Islam he is their Messiah, the Mahdi, the chosen of Allah. In the Biblical account he is the Antichrist, a false messiah ginned up by Satan. His domination is temporary, triggering the Wrath of God, which culminates in the Second Coming of Christ, the real Messiah.
Islam’s ultimate hero is Christianity’s greatest villain, a false Christ designed to deceive the world and seize ultimate power in a worldwide empire.
It is an Islamic lie that their god is the same as our God. But then one expects lies from their god, the Father of Lies.
* * *
If you found this post interesting you might also like some of my books:
The Bible - Dead Letter or Message from Your Creator?
Revolutionary Discipleship What does Jesus expect from his followers? How did he train his disciples?
Has Christianity lost its cultural relevance? Has the Church’s misguided efforts to market itself to non-Christians doomed it to irrelevance? Is it time for a new Reformation? Spiritual Embezzlement Made Easy
Of Myth and Magic A comparison of religion, philosophy and magick throughout history. Are all religions basically the same? Is there a way to Truth and contentment?
The ultimate conspiracy theory book: The Red Pill
The best source book you’ll ever find on End Times prophecy: Jesus is Only Coming Twice.
And if you didn’t like this post…well, there’s always something on TV.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)
The Koran declares the servants of Allah are more evolved than other humans and that unbelievers are hardly better than animals. Women are seen as inferior, even to infidel men.
Koran 3: 110 Ye are the best of peoples evolved for mankind enjoining what is right forbidding what is wrong and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith it were best for them; among them are some who have faith but most of them are perverted transgressors.
And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like livestock; rather, they are more astray. It is they who are the heedless. Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve (Koran 8:55) They are the worst of creatures. (Koran 98:6) …he is like the dog; whether you pet him or scold him, he pants. Such is the example of people who reject our proofs. (Koran 7:176)
The Koran provides in chapter 4, verse 34 the proper way to deal with disobedient wives, which includes neglect and beatings, while the Bible advises:
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it… So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. … let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself…. (Ephesians 5:25-33)
Islam considers Jesus as merely a prophet and not even the greatest of those (that’s Mohamed) while Christianity is entirely based on the idea Jesus is the actual divine Son of God. Those two beliefs are mutually incompatible and if you have any doubts on this, the Koran specifically states many times that Allah has no son and such a thing is not even possible. (Koran chapter 6:101, 17:111, 18:4-6, 23:91 etc.) Thus the Koran specifically attacks the cardinal belief of Christianity, not just once but many times. Islam and Christianity are not compatible and do not worship the same God.
Comparing their accounts of the Apocalypse demonstrates the most revealing proof of the actual relationship of Islam to Christianity.
In Islam they await a messiah, the Mahdi, who will someday return, unite the world under his rule for seven years, leading the Faithful in a Holy War against the Jews and Christians who will be eradicated from the Earth, after which will dawn a new age of peace and prosperity. Without a close examination, this appears at first glance to be rather similar to the End Time events predicted by the Christian Apostle John in the biblical book of Revelation. But the Devil’s in the details – literally.
Biblical prophecy indicates at the end of time a spiritual leader will arise and unite the world under his personal dictatorial rule. He will then proceed to persecute Jews and Christians for seven years, martyring them by the millions. So far this sounds exactly like the account in the Koran. The difference is the identification of this world ruler. In Islam he is their Messiah, the Mahdi, the chosen of Allah. In the Biblical account he is the Antichrist, a false messiah ginned up by Satan. His domination is temporary, triggering the Wrath of God, which culminates in the Second Coming of Christ, the real Messiah.
Islam’s ultimate hero is Christianity’s greatest villain, a false Christ designed to deceive the world and seize ultimate power in a worldwide empire.
It is an Islamic lie that their god is the same as our God. But then one expects lies from their god, the Father of Lies.
* * *
If you found this post interesting you might also like some of my books:
The Bible - Dead Letter or Message from Your Creator?
Revolutionary Discipleship What does Jesus expect from his followers? How did he train his disciples?
Has Christianity lost its cultural relevance? Has the Church’s misguided efforts to market itself to non-Christians doomed it to irrelevance? Is it time for a new Reformation? Spiritual Embezzlement Made Easy
Of Myth and Magic A comparison of religion, philosophy and magick throughout history. Are all religions basically the same? Is there a way to Truth and contentment?
The ultimate conspiracy theory book: The Red Pill
The best source book you’ll ever find on End Times prophecy: Jesus is Only Coming Twice.
And if you didn’t like this post…well, there’s always something on TV.
