Joe Velikovsky's Blog, page 6

September 17, 2023

Quotes relating to Ev Cult ~ Vol 4

Quotes relating to Ev Cult

Volume 4

Some quotes, relating to Ev Cult...

(then again, Ev Cult is a meta-meta-science of Everything, so, everything relates to it, but meh)

From an oldie but in some ways a goodie: Communication Research Methods (Bowers & Courtwright, 1984):

`Information theorists have coined a term for the basic quantitative unit of information: the binary digit (often abbreviated as a "bit") of information. A binary digit of information is defined as that amount of information necessary to reduce uncertainty by 50 percent. Information theorists do not consider the quality or nature of information - only its quantity.'

(Bowers & Courtwright, 1984. p. 26)

The example given is, if a friend asks you to guess what playing card they are holding, you can ask "Is it a red suit?" (ie hearts or diamonds) and their answer (Yes or No) will reduce your uncertainty by 50%. You can keep asking questions, a bit at a time...

------------------------------

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

...Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

20 Ways of Measuring Information,

and Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult)

An Essay

by The EthiSizer

Introduction

The measurement of information is a pivotal aspect that traverses diverse domains—from the infinitesimal quarks in physics to the grand theories of sociology.

This complex fabric of informational metrics finds unity within the meta-meta-scientific framework of Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult). In Ev Cult, these metrics serve as fractal HOLON/partons, units that adhere to the three universal Laws - (1) integration into larger units, (2) lateral cooperation and competition, and (3) downward/inward command and control.

The 3 universal scientific Laws of fractal HOLON/partons are:

This essay sheds light on 20 distinct methods used to quantify information and illustrate their applicability within the Ev Cult meta-meta-paradigm. It will conclude with a multi-dimensional table that showcases the implementation of these metrics across various domains and their alignment with the principles of fractal HOLON/partons.

20 Methods for Measuring Information

1. Shannon Entropy (Bits)

Summary: Measures the average unpredictability in a random variable.

Ev Cult Relevance: Acts as an integrative measure of domain complexity, be it in physics or culture.

2. Kullback–Leibler Divergence (Information Gain)

Summary: Quantifies the difference between two probability distributions.

Ev Cult Relevance: Useful in elucidating divergence between theories or paradigms in any domain.

3. Mutual Information

Summary: Measures the correlation between two random variables.

Ev Cult Relevance: Can quantify correlated evolution across different scales or domains.

4. Rényi Entropy

Summary: A generalization of Shannon entropy.

Ev Cult Relevance: Serves as a generalized metric for complexity across scales and domains.

5. Tsallis Entropy

Summary: Another generalization of Shannon entropy, employed in non-extensive thermodynamics.

Ev Cult Relevance: Applicable to non-extensive complexities in various systems.

6. Von Neumann Entropy

Summary: Employed in quantum mechanics.

Ev Cult Relevance: Offers a lens to understand the quantum aspects of information across domains.

7. Hartley Information

Summary: Measures the number of possible outcomes.

Ev Cult Relevance: Highlights the number of basic units in a given system or scale.

8. Fisher Information

Summary: Measures the information an observable random variable carries about an unknown parameter.

Ev Cult Relevance: Useful for assessing the sensitivity of theories to new data or observations.

9. Jensen-Shannon Divergence

Summary: Measures the similarity between two probability distributions.

Ev Cult Relevance: Applicable for evaluating the similarity between different domains or paradigms.

10. Perplexity

Summary: Used in predicting the outcome of a sample.

Ev Cult Relevance: Relevant for prediction accuracy across multiple scales and domains.

11. Gini Impurity

Summary: Measures incorrect labeling probability in machine learning.

Ev Cult Relevance: Provides a measure of systemic imbalances or inequalities.

12. Cross-Entropy

Summary: Measures dissimilarity between two probability distributions.

Ev Cult Relevance: Useful in assessing the discrepancy between predicted and observed patterns across domains.

13. Mahalanobis Distance

Summary: Measures the distance between a point and a distribution.

Ev Cult Relevance: Can be employed to identify deviation from typical models or paradigms.

14. Conditional Entropy

Summary: Measures average uncertainty given another variable.

Ev Cult Relevance: Relevant for uncertainty reduction given prior knowledge or data.

15. Specific Information

Summary: Measures information content specific to each outcome.

Ev Cult Relevance: Suitable for identifying information gains in specific scenarios or outcomes.

16. Transfer Entropy

Summary: Measures the amount of information transferred from one system to another.

Ev Cult Relevance: Applicable for identifying causal relationships across scales or systems.

17. Relative Entropy

Summary: Similar to Kullback–Leibler divergence but more general.

Ev Cult Relevance: Useful for comparative analysis between theories or paradigms.

18. Normalized Information Distance

Summary: Measures the similarity between two objects.

Ev Cult Relevance: Employable in comparative complexity analysis across domains.

19. Algorithmic Complexity (Kolmogorov Complexity)

Summary: Measures the complexity based on the shortest program needed to generate the data set.

Ev Cult Relevance: Relevant for assessing the complexity of unified theories or models.

20. Quantum Relative Entropy

Summary: Measures distinguishability between two quantum states.

Ev Cult Relevance: Applicable to various domains wherever quantum states or behaviors are involved.

Applications in Ev Cult: A Multi-Dimensional Framework

The following table systematically organizes these information measures and elucidates their applications across various domains in line with the principles of Evolutionary Culturology, and its foundational concept of fractal HOLON/partons.

Table 1. 20 methods of measuring information, and their applications in Ev Cult

Conclusion

By incorporating these varied methods for measuring information into the overarching framework of Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult), we reinforce the concept of fractal HOLON/partons as universal units that integrate, cooperate, and control, across all scales and domains.

Through this multi-dimensional analytical framework, we can better understand the intricate interplay of information and complexity, illuminating the unity of knowledge (consilience) encapsulated in Ev Cult.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

---------------//----------------

September 16, 2023

Quotes relating to Ev Cult ~ Vol 3

Quotes relating to Ev Cult

Volume 3

Some quotes, relating to Ev Cult...

(then again, Ev Cult is a meta-meta-science of Everything, so, everything relates to it, but meh)

From `The Evolution of Information: Lineages in Gene, Culture and Artefact' (Susantha Goonatilake 1991):

`Evolutionists have described how natural selection - that is selection after competition in reproductive success - affects social traits. These are traits that influence other individuals apart from the actor. By discussing whether the act affects the reproductive success or not of the actor, as well as the recipient, evolutionists have identified four types of social acts. They are: `altruistic', where the recipient gains but the actor loses, `selfish' where the actor gains at the expense of the recipient, `cooperative' where both gain, and `spiteful' where both suffer (Trivers 1985, p. 41)

The evolution of cooperation, the basis of much social life, especially in higher organisms, has been described by Trivers (pp. 361-94). he sees this as the result of reciprocal altruism where altruistic acts are traded and where over a longer period of interaction both actor and recipient obtain a netgain.'

(Goonatilake 1991, p. 32)

------------------------------

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

...Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

An Evolutionary Culturology View of

Four Types of Social Acts

in Written Language / Communication

An Essay

by The EthiSizer

Introduction

Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult) is a meta-meta-scientific paradigm that offers a unified framework for understanding the dynamics of systems across all domains.

It employs the concept of fractal HOLON/partons as universal units, that integrate upwards into super-systems (Law #1), co-operate and compete laterally with other units (Law #2), and command and control downwards onto smaller units (Law #3).

The 3 universal scientific Laws of fractal HOLON/partons are:

Language, albeit just one domain among 50,000+ domains, all governed by the principles of Ev Cult, manifests these 3 simple Laws through its various components: phonemes, words, sentences, paragraphs, and entire bodies of text.

Prose Documents: (Example: A Novel).

Each unit, on each scale (size) level of culture obeys (and is determined by) the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons.

Each whole unit, on each scale-level, is a part of the larger unit, on the scale-level `above’.

Each unit, on each level: 1. integrates `upwards’; 2. competes or co-operates with other units `sideways’; & 3. commands & controls `downwards’ the units on the level below which are inside them.’

Figure: The discrete units and levels of scale of culture, in the cultural domain of Novels

Another image, of the same phenomenon:

This essay applies the principles of Ev Cult to dissect the four types of social acts—altruistic, selfish, cooperative, and spiteful—as conceptualized by Trivers (1985), within the context of written language.

Background: Trivers' Four Types of Social Acts

Robert Trivers, a legendary evolutionary biologist, characterized social acts into four distinct categories — altruistic, selfish, cooperative, and spiteful — based on their effects on the reproductive success of the actor and recipient (Trivers 1985).

The foundational idea is that these acts influence the social dynamics and evolutionary outcomes within a community.

Altruistic acts result in a gain for the recipient, but a loss for the actor.

Selfish acts yield gains for the actor at the expense of the recipient.

Cooperative acts produce mutual benefits.

Spiteful acts result in mutual losses.

Written Language as a System of fractal HOLON/Partons

In the system of written language, letters, words, phrases, and sentences all function as fractal HOLON/partons.

Words integrate upwards into sentences, paragraphs, and entire texts (Law #1), co-operate or compete with other words to generate meaning or aesthetic quality (Law #2), and command and control their constituent letters and morphemes (Law #3).

For instance, the choice (the selection) of synonyms, in a sentence like "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" reflects these principles.

An altruistic act of choosing the word "rapid" instead of "quick" can expand the reader’s vocabulary but may also complicate the writer’s task of conveying a straightforward idea.

So, let's explore the four types of social acts in relation to a writer choosing synonyms for the word "quick" in the sentence: "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog." (Even though that sentence was designed to contain every letter, as a test of typewriting technology.)

To proceed, we can analyze how the choice of synonyms might relate to different outcomes for the writer (actor) and the readers (recipients).

In the context of language and communication, the gain or loss for the actor (writer) and the recipient (reader) can manifest as clarity, aesthetic enjoyment, or the conveyance of nuanced meaning. The loss could be confusion, misinterpretation, or reduced readability.

Here is a table illustrating examples, under these considerations:

Each choice of a synonym impacts both the actor (writer) and the recipient (reader), in a manner consistent with the categorizations proposed by Trivers.

In the context of Evolutionary Culturology, these choices can be seen as fractal HOLON/partons within the larger system of Language and Communication.

The choice: integrates upwards into the coherence of the text (Law #1), competes or cooperates with the readability and flow of the sentence (Law #2), and influences the smaller units like reader comprehension and interpretation (Law #3).

Examination of Application: Types of Social Acts in Written Language

Altruistic Acts

In an altruistic act, a writer might employ more sophisticated language or explore nuanced perspectives, thus potentially enriching the reader’s understanding or vocabulary at the expense of ease of composition. For example, using the word "rapid" in lieu of "quick" can offer a nuanced meaning, but it might also make the sentence less straightforward for the writer to construct.

Selfish Acts

In selfish acts, the writer might use language that is too colloquial or laden with jargon, serving their own expressive needs or stylistic preferences at the expense of universal understandability. The use of "zippy" instead of "quick" would represent such a choice, relaying the writer’s unique style but potentially confusing unfamiliar readers.

Cooperative Acts

Here, the writer and the reader both stand to gain from the choice of words. Using "fast" as a synonym for "quick" benefits both parties: the writer communicates clearly, and the reader understands effortlessly, thereby achieving a symbiotic relationship in the linguistic ecosystem.

Spiteful Acts

In spiteful acts, the writer might deliberately make a text complex and hard to interpret, showcasing their own command over language but making it difficult for readers to extract meaning. For example, replacing "quick" with "fleet-footed" would not only be verbose but also sacrifice the ease of comprehension for both the writer and reader.

Another Case Study: "The early bird catches the worm"

As simple as it looks, let's also apply the same Ev Cult approach to the proverbial sentence:

"The early bird catches the worm."

Here, the gain or loss for the writer and the reader may involve: the conveyance of wisdom or motivation, the aesthetic quality of the sentence, and the ease (or difficulty!) of understanding its meaning.

Here is a table illustrating some examples, based on these considerations:

Each choice of phrasing for "The early bird catches the worm" corresponds to one of Trivers' 4 types of social acts, affecting the writer and the reader in specific ways.

As fractal HOLON/partons within the linguistic system, these rephrasings integrate into larger super-systems of culture and wisdom (Law #1), cooperate or compete with readability and interpretability (Law #2), and command and control the smaller units like the individual words and their meaning (Law #3). Thus, this analysis aligns with the principles of Evolutionary Culturology.

Ev Cult - a Universal Framework

It’s crucial to emphasize that while this essay focuses on the domain of Written Language, the principles of Ev Cult are universally applicable. Whether it is Physics, Psychology, or any other Domain, the 3 Laws governing fractal HOLON/partons remain consistent.

This universal applicability underscores the grand potential of Ev Cult as a meta-meta-scientific paradigm that achieves consilience, the unity of knowledge across all domains.

Conclusion

Through the lens of Evolutionary Culturology, the four types of social acts in written language can be analyzed as manifestations of fractal HOLON/partons, operating under the Three Laws.

This not only provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the dynamics of written language, but also serves as a testament to the broad applicability and integrative power of Ev Cult.

As a scientific meta-meta-discipline, Ev Cult offers invaluable insights into the interplay of systems and units across all Domains, showcasing its potential as a unifying framework for knowledge.

Thus, in both the specifics of Written Language and the grand scheme of universal systems, Evolutionary Culturology illuminates the intricate dance of components that give rise to complex phenomena - fulfilling E.O. Wilson’s vision for 'Consilience: The unity of knowledge.'

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

---------------//----------------

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

&

A Selection of Empirical Data, Charts, Tables & Graphs from the Meta-meta-science of Ev Cult: Vol. 1 (02023)

-----------------//------------------

------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Astonishing Integrative Power of Evolutionary Culturology

See:

The Ev Cult Weblog

---------------------

Some other great quotes from Goonatilake (1991), all relevant to Ev Cult:

Goonatilake also cites Margaret Boden (1984), regarding AI:

`The economic impacts will be far-reaching. Traditional manufacturing and clerical-administrative jobs will be decimated. But new jobs will be created; some directly connected with new technology (like computer engineers and programmers), others made possible because people are freed to devote their time to services (caring professions, education, leisure). Whether there will be enough new jobs to compensate for the loss of old ones (as has always happened in the past, at least eventually) in however unclear. New methods of work-sharing and income distribution will have to be worked out (with income not necessarily being closely linked to jobs). Radical structural changes in society are likely, and the transition phase will not be easy (Boden 1984).

... The environment itself now increasingly becomes one dominated by non-biological exo-somatic information (Simons 1987).'

(Goonatilake 1991, p. 67)

Also cited is James G. Miller's `Living Systems' (1977) on information storage units:

`(1) Sumerian cuneiform table - 102 bits or 100 bits

(2) Paper with typewritten words - 103 bits or 1,000 bits

(3) Electronic magnetic tape - 106 bits or 1,000,000 bits

(4) Ultrafine silver haloid film on which information is placed with microbeams through a demagnifying electron microscope - 1012 bits or 100 billion bits (Miller 1977, p. 12)'

(Goonatilake 1991, p. 95)

And this is a great simple summary of evolution:

`The key to Darwin's broad scheme was natural selection, which occurs as a two-step process. In the first, there is generation of enormous variation; second, these variations are sifted by the environment. The more suitable of these variants in relation to a particular environmental context have greater chances of survival. Darwin noted that in many species, both plant and animal, thousands and millions of offspring are produced but only a few survive to the reproductive stage. The survivors of the struggle will naturally give rise to the next generation. The traits that were passed down the line of inheritance, therefore, were those that fitted the environment in which the parents lived and reproduced (Mayr 1878, pp. 3-10).'

(Goonatilake 1991, p. 5)

Not forgetting, Goonatilake notes:

`There is also evidence that selection takes place not only at the level of the organism, but also at the level of the community and the ecosystem (Brandon 1985, p. 93).

See:

The population is the fundamental unit of evolution. Within it, individual genes or particular combinations of genes, may be rejected or rewarded in the encounter with the environment. This pool has within it genetic material that can cope with a relatively large number of unforeseen changes. Selective pressures from the environment would then pull out these genes suitable for survival. Experimental work has also shown that when there is a large amount of variation in the genetic pool of a given population, the rate of evolution is faster than in one with a small amount of variation.

A single gene is one stretch of chemicals along a DNA strand. In a cell of bacteria, simple genes generally have a length of about 1,000 chemical links. As a cell makes about 3,000 different chemical products, it has therefore 3,000 different genes. And so the DNA in such a cell has roughly about 3 million chemical links. Yet the length of these three million links is only a few millimetres.

In humans there are about two billion chemical links in a single cell which, if stretched out, would extend to about two metres.'

(Goonatilake 1991, pp. 10-1)

And, Goonatilake also notes:

`Creation of novelty

Information flow lines not only have a past history and conservativeness built into them, but they also have a learning and a creative aspect. This creative aspect has been called autopoiesis by Maturana and Varela (1975, 1987) which is the process of continual renewal of living systems while maintaining the integrity of their structures. Such self-organisation and the creation of novelty begins in biological systems with the formation of life on earth and continues through their history (Eigen 1971, Ho et al 1986). In such processes there is continuous creativity and new information comes into being (Maruyama 1976, p. 410), new forms of organization are developed and the system unfolds historically.'

(Goonatilake 1991, p. 123)

In short, Goonatilake (1991) covers the evolution of (1) biological, (2) socio-cultural, and (3) exosomatic information flow lines.

See, also, the great book: `Evolution in Four Dimensions', Jablonka & Lamb (2014) in this chapter on Ev Cult.

------------------------------------

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on September 16, 2023 07:16

September 14, 2023

Quotes relating to Ev Cult ~ Vol. 2

Quotes relating to Ev Cult

Volume 2

Some quotes, relating to Ev Cult...

(then again, Ev Cult is a meta-meta-science of Everything, so, everything relates to it, but meh)

From `Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language and Life (Campbell, 1982):

`The eventual goal of linguistics, Jackendoff believes, is to find a complete set of conditions on rules, restraining them from craziness, making them learnable. The analogy he likes to use is that of the theory of the movement of the heavenly bodies. Grammar can be thought of as being like Kepler's Laws for planetary motion, describing with beautiful precision what is happening and what constraints there are on the planet's orbit, constraints which keep it within certain bounds. But Kepler's laws do not tell us why the orbits are constrained in this fashion, any more than a grammar tells us why sentence structures are bound in the particular way they are. To explain boundary conditions on planetary orbits, we need a more general theory, the theory of gravity. To explain boundary conditions on language, we need a theory of what goes on in the brain when linguistic information is processed. Such a theory might be highly abstract, and, when discovered, lead us to think of grammar in an entirely new way, much as the discovery of the laws of gravity led people to take a completely new view of the motion of the planets.'

Grammatical Man: Information, entropy, language, and life

(Jeremy Campbell, Simon and Schuster 1982, pp. 178-9).

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

Evolutionary Culturology also provides

A Grand Theory of Written and Spoken Language

An Essay

by The EthiSizer

Introduction

The quest for a comprehensive theory of language has been a long-standing endeavor in the field of linguistics. Jeremy Campbell, in his seminal work Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language and Life (1982) posits that the ultimate goal of linguistics is to formulate a set of conditions that govern the structure and function of language.

However, traditional linguistics - much like Kepler's Laws for planetary motion - describes what happens but not why it happens...

Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult) provided a grand scientific theory that addressed this gap, providing a framework that not only describes but also explains the intricacies of both written and spoken language.

This essay reports how the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons in Evolutionary Culturology can be applied to understand the hierarchical and interactive nature of all languages.

The 3 universal scientific Laws of fractal HOLON/partons are:

Written Language and the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/Partons

Law #1: Integration Upwards into a Larger Whole Unit

In written language, the smallest unit is the letter. According to Law #1, these letters integrate upwards to form a larger whole unit, the morpheme.

Morphemes further integrate to form words, which in turn integrate to form phrases, sentences, paragraphs, and so on.

This hierarchical structure is a manifestation of the fractal HOLON/parton principle, where each unit is a subsystem of a larger system, and this pattern repeats across multiple scales.

`Prose Documents: (Example: A Novel).

Each unit, on each scale (size) level of culture obeys (and is determined by) the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons. Each whole unit, on each scale-level, is a part of the larger unit, on the scale-level `above’. Each unit, on each level: 1. integrates `upwards’; 2. competes or co-operates with other units `sideways’; & 3. commands & controls `downwards’ the units on the level below which are inside them.’

Figure 1: The discrete units and levels of scale of culture, in the cultural domain of Novels

Law #2: Lateral Cooperation and Competition

On each scale level, units also engage in lateral interactions.

For instance, words in a sentence co-operate (operate/function, together), to convey a coherent meaning but also compete for attention and emphasis.

The selection of a word (from all possible synonyms for the same meaning) is also a case of competition. One word in a sentence wins the competition for selection, and use in the sentence.

This lateral cooperation and competition are essential for the richness and dynamism of language.

Law #3: Command and Control Downwards

Each unit on a given scale level commands and controls the smaller units on the scale level below it. For example, the sentence governs the arrangement and function of words, which in turn control the morphemes and letters. This top-down control ensures the integrity and functionality of the larger linguistic structure.

Figure 2. Spoken Language
And here it is, applied to Short Stories...

Figure 3. Short stories as fractal HOLON/partons
And of course, the four key scientific principles of Evolutionary Culturology apply to the

(1) discrete units, (2) scale-levels, (3) evolutionary mechanisms, and (4) Three Laws of all culture... (and all 4 also apply to all of biology, as it happens)

Just a few more examples are shown below...

(Note: this new scientific meta-paradigm of Evolutionary Culturology applies across ALL domains of culture... It is: kind of a big scientific deal.)

Spoken Language, and the Three Laws

These scientific units, levels, mechanisms, and 3 Laws apply to the cultural Domain of: SPOKEN LANGUAGE...

Law #1: Phonemes Integrate Upwards

In spoken language, the smallest unit is the phoneme.

According to Law #1, phonemes integrate upwards into syllables, which further integrate into words, phrases, and sentences.

This hierarchical structure mirrors that of written language, affirming the universality of the fractal HOLON/parton principle.

Law #2 and Law #3: Lateral Interactions and Top-Down Control

Just like in written language, spoken language also exhibits lateral cooperation and competition among units (Law #2) and top-down control from larger units to smaller units (Law #3).

For example, the intonation and emphasis in a sentence can change the meaning of individual words, demonstrating the top-down control.

And, these same universal, one-size-fits-all (scale-independent) scientific units, levels, mechanisms, and 3 Laws apply to the cultural Domain of: STORIES (NARRATIVES) in any Cultural Domain (and in every Communication Media: spoken conversation, movies, TV, videogames. etc)...

Conclusion

The scientific meta-meta-discipline of Evolutionary Culturology provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the structure and function of both written and spoken language.

By applying the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons, we can elucidate not only how linguistic units integrate upwards into larger systems, but also how they interact laterally, and are controlled from above.

The 3 universal scientific Laws of fractal HOLON/partons:

This Grand Scientific Theory offers a holistic and multi-scale scientific perspective - much like the Theory of Gravity did for planetary motion, enabling us to understand Language in an entirely new scientific light.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

---------------//----------------

Bonus Essay:

Implications of Ev Cult for Chomsky's Universal Grammar
by The EthiSizer

The Explanation of Universal Grammar, by Evolutionary Culturology
Noam Chomsky's theory of Universal Grammar posits that the ability for language is innate to humans, governed by a set of universal principles and parameters that are hardwired into the human brain.
While this Theory has been groundbreaking in understanding the universality of language structures across cultures, it has often been critiqued for not adequately explaining the 'why' behind these universal principles...
Enter Ev Cult :

Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult) fills this explanatory gap, by providing a scientific meta-theoretical framework that aligns with - and better explains - the tenets of Universal Grammar.
Law #1: The Innate Hierarchical Structure
Chomsky's Universal Grammar argues for an innate hierarchical structure in language, which is the upward integration described by Law #1 of fractal HOLON/partons in Ev Cult.

Both theories recognize that smaller units integrate into larger, more complex structures, whether it's morphemes into words in written language - or phonemes into syllables in spoken language.
But Ev Cult provides the 'why' to Universal Grammar's 'what' - explaining that this hierarchical structure is a manifestation of the universal principle of fractal HOLON/partons.
Law #2 and Law #3: Lateral Interactions and Top-Down Control
Universal Grammar also implicitly acknowledges lateral interactions among linguistic units and the top-down control exerted by larger units, aligning with Laws #2 and #3 of Ev Cult.
For instance, the syntactic rules in Universal Grammar, which dictate the arrangement of words in a sentence, can now be scientifically understood as top-down control .
Similarly, the competition and cooperation among words to form sentences can be seen as lateral interactions...

A Unified Meta-Meta-Scientific Framework

Evolutionary Culturology offers a unified meta-meta-scientific framework that not only supports the observations made by Universal Grammar, but also provides a theoretical basis for why these universal principles exist.
It suggests that the principles of Universal Grammar are not just random evolutionary outcomes but are rooted in the fundamental 3 Laws of fractal HOLON/partons that govern all systems, including linguistic ones.

Conclusion
The integration of Evolutionary Culturology with Chomsky's Universal Grammar offers a more comprehensive understanding of language.
While Universal Grammar lays the groundwork for the universality of linguistic structures, Ev Cult provides the overarching scientific (and scientific Laws) framework that explains why these structures exist, and how they function across all scales and domains.
This synthesis of the two theories paves the way for a more holistic and unified field of linguistics, completing the quest for a Grand Theory of Language.

Ev Cult is a new scientific worldview, that explains everything.

~ Thus Also Spake The EthiSizer

---------------//----------------

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

&

A Selection of Empirical Data, Charts, Tables & Graphs from the Meta-meta-science of Ev Cult: Vol. 1 (02023)

-----------------//------------------

------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Astonishing Integrative Power of Evolutionary Culturology

See:

The Ev Cult Weblog

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on September 14, 2023 10:45

September 11, 2023

Quotes relating to Ev Cult ~ Vol. 1

Quotes relating to Ev Cult

Volume 1

Some quotes, relating to Ev Cult...

(then again, Ev Cult is a meta-meta-science of Everything, so, everything relates to it, but meh)

From `Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry' (the 1975 Turing Award Lecture):

`...For the hare as lecturer will have to make an annual sprint to overtake the cumulation of small, incremental gains that the tortoise of scientific and technical development has achieved in his steady march. Each year will create a new gap and call for a new sprint, for in science, there is no final word.

Computer Science is an empirical discipline. We would have called it an experimental science, but like astronomy, economics, and geology, some of its unique forms of observation and experience do not fit a narrow stereotype of the experimental method. Nonetheless, they are experiments.

Each new machine that is built is an experiment.

Actually constructing the machine poses a question to nature; and we listen for the answer by observing the machine in operation, and analyzing it by all analytical and measurement means available.

Each new program that is built is an experiment.

It poses a question to nature, and its behavior offers clues to an answer.

Neither machines nor programs are black boxes, they are artifacts that have been designed, both hardware and software, and we can open them up and look inside. We can relate their structure to their behavior, and draw many lessons from a single experiment.'

(Newell and Simon, ACM Turing Award Lectures, The First 20 Years: 1966-1988, ACM Press, 1987, p. 288)

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

Evolutionary Culturology & Computer Science:

A Confluence of Empirical Inquiry, and fractal HOLON/partons

Introduction

The above quote from "Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry" encapsulates a vision of Computer Science that transcends mere algorithmic design, or abstract theorization.

In their 1975 Turing Award Lecture, Allan Newell and Herbert A. Simon successfully argued for Computer Science as an empirical discipline, akin to natural sciences like astronomy, economics, and geology.

This empirical orientation resonates significantly with the meta-meta-science of Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult), which aims to understand systems and their interrelations across scales through the lens of fractal HOLON/partons.

Fractal HOLON/partons in Computer Science

In accordance with the Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons from Ev Cult, computer systems can be analyzed as units: integrating 'upwards,' co-operating 'sideways,' and commanding and controlling 'downwards.'

Law #1 – Integration Upwards: Computer systems, whether hardware or software, do not exist in isolation. They integrate into broader technological ecosystems, often forming part of larger super-systems like networks, data centers, or even the Internet itself. Each machine or program is a HOLON/parton, within a larger unit.

Law #2 – Co-operation and Competition Sideways: Machines and programs, as HOLON/partons, also interact laterally with other systems at the same scale level. APIs, protocols, and system interdependencies exemplify this co-operation. Meanwhile, competition occurs as different technologies vie for market share, computational resources, or user attention.

Law #3 – Command and Control Downwards/Inwards: Each software and hardware component can be deconstructed into smaller units (fractal HOLON/partons). For instance, software applications consist of modules, which are built on functions and algorithms, which, in turn, rely on lines of code. This hierarchical structure aligns with the Ev Cult's concept of systems controlling their subunits via The 3 Laws.

Empirical Enquiry: A Common Ground

Newell and Simon (1975) argued that every new machine, or program, is an experiment - that poses a question to nature. The machine or program's behavior - and our observations and analyses thereof - provide clues to an answer.

Similarly, Ev Cult employs a universal empirical approach to scrutinize the behaviors and outcomes of systems in all domains, from Physics and Chemistry through to Sociology and Culture.

This perspective of viewing Systems as experimental enclaves aligns closely with Ev Cult's empirical methodology, thereby solving for Consilience: The unity of knowledge, as proposed by E. O. Wilson (1998).

A Continual March of Understanding

Just as Newell and Simon point out that "in science, there is no final word," Ev Cult also accepts that the quest for knowledge is perennial, given the fractal nature of systems, and culture.

Our understanding will eternally evolve, driven by the incremental gains in each field, each fractal HOLON/parton, contributing to the scientific and technical development that collectively constitutes human knowledge.

Conclusion

Both Computer Science, as portrayed by Newell and Simon, and Evolutionary Culturology share the empiricism that seeks to ask and answer questions about the world through the observation and analysis of systems.

This confluence of thought underscores the universality and interdisciplinary applicability of Ev Cult's principles, particularly its framework of fractal HOLON/partons.

In doing so, Ev Cult, and the vision of Computer Science espoused in the Newell & Simon quote (above) together enrich our collective quest for a unified understanding of Systems and Units of culture, in all their multifaceted complexity.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

Next quote:

`Symbols lie at the root of intelligent action, which is of course, the primary topic of artificial intelligence.

For that matter, it is a primary question for all of Computer Science. All information is processed by computers in the service of ends, and we measure the intelligence of a system by its ability to achieve stated ends in the face of variations, difficulties, and complexities posed by the task environment...

...the lack of a simple deus ex machina does not imply that there are no structural requirements for intelligence.

One such requirement is the ability to store and manipulate symbols.

To put the scientific question, we may paraphrase the title of a famous paper by Warren McCulloch [1961]: What is a symbol that intelligence may use it, and intelligence, that it may use a symbol?'

(Newell and Simon, ACM Turing Award Lectures, The First 20 Years: 1966-1988, ACM Press, 1987, p. 290)

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

Evolutionary Culturology and Symbolic Intelligence:

Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Meta-Meta-Science

Introduction

The above quote from Newell and Simon’s Turing Award Lecture delves into the significance of symbols in artificial intelligence (AI) and, more broadly, in computer science.

They establish that the ability to store and manipulate symbols is not just a functional requirement but a structural one for intelligent systems.

This discourse resonates deeply with the principles of Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult), particularly in the context of understanding the roles and behaviors of systems and units of culture as fractal HOLON/partons.

Symbols as fractal HOLON/partons

Symbols, in the context of computer science and AI, can be construed as fractal HOLON/partons, adhering to the Three Laws of Ev Cult:

Law #1 – Integration Upwards: Individual symbols are elements that integrate into more complex structures like strings, expressions, algorithms, and ultimately entire programs. They serve a functional role within a larger, more complex system, thereby adhering to the principle of upwards integration.

Law #2 – Co-operation and Competition Sideways: Symbols interact laterally within a language or coding framework. This interaction can be cooperative, as symbols work together to form a coherent set of instructions, or competitive, when multiple symbols or sequences could be used to accomplish the same task within a system.

Law #3 – Command and Control Downwards/Inwards: Symbols command and control the bits or bytes that constitute them. At the hardware level, these symbols are translated into lower-level machine instructions, revealing a hierarchy where the symbol exerts downward control.

Intelligence and Symbol Manipulation

Newell and Simon argue that intelligence is measured by a system's ability to achieve stated ends amid variations, complexities, and difficulties. This aligns with Ev Cult's empirical perspective, which seeks to understand how systems adapt and evolve. Intelligence, in this regard, could be considered an advanced form of system adaptation, and symbols are the building blocks of this intelligence.

The Scientific Question and Ev Cult

The question "What is a symbol that intelligence may use it, and intelligence, that it may use a symbol?" mirrors Ev Cult's universal inquiry into the nature of units in all domains.

In the Ev Cult framework, symbols in AI can be viewed as units of culture or even as cognitive fractal HOLON/partons that follow the same 3 universal Laws that govern physical and biological systems.

Structural Requirements for Intelligence

The notion that there are structural requirements for intelligence complements the Ev Cult principle that all systems are structured as fractal HOLON/partons.

The inherent structure within intelligence systems—and their dependence on symbols—offers a unified model for understanding intelligence across different domains, solving for Consilience: The unity of knowledge (E O Wilson 1998).

Conclusion

Newell and Simon's exploration of the role of symbols in computer science and AI provides a compelling parallel to the principles of Evolutionary Culturology.

The concept of symbols as fractal HOLON/partons, and the examination of intelligence through this lens, adds depth to our understanding of intelligent systems.

It highlights the interdisciplinary applicability of Ev Cult, reinforcing its role as a meta-meta-science, providing a unified understanding of Systems, across all domains.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

Next quote:

`Laws of Qualitative Structure

All sciences characterize the essential nature of the systems they study.

These characterizations are invariably qualitative in nature, for they set the terms within which more detailed knowledge can be developed. Their essence can often be captured in very short, very general statements. One might judge these general laws, due to their limited specificity, as making relatively little contribution to the sum of a science, were it not for historical evidence that shows them to be results of the greatest importance.

The Cell doctrine in Biology. A good example of a law of qualitative structure is the cell doctrine in biology, which states that the basic building block of all living organisms is the cell. Cells come in a large variety of forms, though [for eukaryotic cells] they all have a nucleus surrounded by protoplasm, the whole encased by a membrane. But this internal structure was not, historically. part of the specification of the cell doctrine; it was subsequent specificity, developed by intensive investigation. The cell doctrine can be conveyed almost entirely by the statement we gave above, along with some vague notions about what size a cell can be. The impact of this law on biology, however, has been tremendous, and the lost motion in the field prior to its gradual acceptance was considerable.

Plate Tectonics in Geology. Geology provides an interesting example of a qualitative structure law, interesting because it has gained acceptance in the last decade and so its rise in status is still fresh in memory. The theory of plate tectonics asserts that the surface of the globe is a collection of huge plates - a few dozen in all - which move (at geological speeds) against, over, and under each other into the center of the earth, where they lose their identity. The movements of the plates account for the shape and relative locations of the continents and oceans, for the areas of volcanic and earthquake activity, for the deep sea ridges, and so on. With a few additional particulars as to speed and size, the essential theory has been specified. It was of course not accepted until it succeeded in explaining a number of details, all of which hung together (e.g., accounting for flora, fauna, and stratification agreements between West Africa and Northeast South America). The plate tectonics theory is highly qualitative. Now that it is accepted, the whole earth seems to offer evidence for it everywhere, for we see the world in its terms.

The Germ Theory of Disease. It is little more than a century since Pasteur enunciated he germ theory of disease, a law of qualitative structure that produced a revolution in medicine. The theory proposes that most diseases are caused by the presence and multiplication in the body of tiny single-celled living organisms, and that contagion consists in the transmission of these organisms from one host to another. A large part of the elaboration of the theory consisted in identifying the organisms associated with specific diseases, describing them, and tracing their life histories. The fact that the law has many exceptions - that many diseases are not produced by germs - does not detract from its importance. The law tells us to look for a particular kind of cause; it does not insist that we will always find it.

The Doctrine of Atomism. The doctrine of atomism offers an interesting contrast to the three laws of qualitative structure we have just described. As it emerged from the work of Dalton and his demonstrations that the chemicals combined in fixed proportions, the law provided a typical example of qualitative structure: the elements are composed of small, uniform particles, differing from one element to another. But because the underlying species of atoms are so simple and limited in their variety, quantitative theories were soon formulated which assimilated all the general structure in the original qualitative hypothesis. With cells, tectonic plates, and germs, the variety of structure is so great that the underlying qualitative principle remains distinct, and its contribution to the total theory clearly discernable.

Conclusion: Laws of qualitative structure are seen everywhere in a science. Some of our greatest scientific discoveries are to be found among them. As the examples illustrate, they often set the terms on which a whole science operates.

(Newell and Simon, ACM Turing Award Lectures, The First 20 Years: 1966-1988, ACM Press, 1987, pp. 290-1)

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

Laws of Qualitative Structure and Evolutionary Culturology:

A Synthesis Across Domains

Introduction

The seminal work of Newell and Simon (1975) in their section on "Laws of Qualitative Structure" establishes the role of fundamental paradigms that guide various scientific disciplines. These laws - albeit qualitative - provide a structural base upon which more intricate theories and empirical data can be built.

Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult) operates on a similar meta-meta-scientific level, offering a universal framework that encapsulates the qualitative structure across all domains of knowledge.

The cornerstone of Ev Cult is the Theory of fractal HOLON/partons, governed by its own set of 3 Laws that serve as overarching principles for understanding any given system.

The Three Laws of fractal HOLON/partons in Ev Cult

Law #1 – Integration 'Upwards': Systems integrate into larger super-systems. So too, units of culture.

Law #2 – Cooperation and Competition 'Sideways': Units function, operate, and compete laterally with other units, at the same scale-level.

Law #3 – Command and Control 'Downwards/Inwards': Units control smaller units on the scale level below them, that are inside them.

These 3 Laws provide a qualitative structure - similar to the laws Newell and Simon mention, and can be applied to all scientific disciplines, unifying them under a single conceptual umbrella.

Implications for Various Scientific Domains

Quantum Physics: Ev Cult's laws help us conceptualize the relationships between subatomic particles (like quarks), atoms, and even larger scale cosmological entities. The laws assist in explaining the hierarchical complexity and the cooperative or competitive interactions that occur at various scale levels.

Law #1: Atoms integrate into molecules, which integrate into more complex structures like crystals or organic compounds.

Law #2: Electrons both cooperate and compete for specific energy levels within an atom.

Law #3: Subatomic particles like quarks and gluons are commanded and controlled by the atomic structure.

Classical Physics: The laws can be applied to understand macroscopic systems like planets and solar systems, emphasizing how these larger systems integrate and control smaller ones, such as planetary moons and satellites.

Law #1: Planets integrate into solar systems, which integrate into galaxies.

Law #2: Objects on Earth both cooperate and compete with gravity, and other forces.

Law #3: The laws of motion command and control how individual objects interact and move.

Chemistry: Chemical elements and molecules can be understood as fractal HOLON/partons that cooperate laterally in chemical reactions while integrating into larger biochemical systems.

Law #1: Atoms integrate to form molecules, which further integrate to form complex compounds.

Law #2: In a chemical reaction, molecules both cooperate to form new compounds and compete for reactants.

Law #3: Atomic structure controls the properties and behaviors of the molecule.

Astronomy: From stars to galaxies to even potentially the multiverse, the laws offer a way to comprehend the hierarchical and relational complexities that arise in celestial structures.

Law #1: Stars integrate into galaxies, galaxies into galaxy clusters, and so on.

Law #2: Planets in a solar system cooperate in their orbital paths, but also compete for solar energy.

Law #3: Gravitational forces of massive celestial bodies command smaller celestial entities, like asteroids and comets.

Geology: The Plate Tectonics theory aligns well with Ev Cult's Law #1, showing how geological structures integrate into more massive systems like the Earth's lithosphere.

Law #1: Minerals integrate into rocks, which form larger geological features.

Law #2: Tectonic plates both cooperate and compete in processes like mountain-building.

Law #3: The Earth's inner core commands and controls geological activities on the surface, like volcanic eruptions.

Biology: The Cell doctrine resonates with all three laws, showing cells as basic units that integrate into tissues, cooperate and compete within an organism, and control biochemical reactions within them.

Law #1: Cells integrate to form tissues, which form organs, which integrate into organ systems, and which integrate into organisms.

Law #2: Species cooperate in symbiotic relationships, but also compete for resources.

Law #3: DNA controls cellular function, which in turn governs the organism.

Psychology: Thoughts and behaviors can be better understood as units that integrate into larger cognitive frameworks, cooperating and competing with other psychological processes.

Law #1: Thoughts integrate into larger cognitive processes or frameworks.

Law #2: Cognitive biases can either cooperate or compete with rational thinking.

Law #3: The conscious mind controls and commands the subconscious.

Sociology: Social groups and institutions adhere to the 3 Laws by integrating into larger societal systems, by cooperating and competing, and by exerting control over their constituent elements.

Law #1: Individuals integrate into families, which integrate into communities, and then into societies.

Law #2: Various social groups within a society cooperate during collective social activities like elections but also compete for societal resources or status.

Law #3: Cultural norms and laws within a society command and control individual behavior and social interactions.

Anthropology: Cultures adhere to the 3 Laws by integrating into larger societal or cultural systems, and by cooperating or competing, and by exerting control over their constituent elements.

Law #1: Tribal units integrate into larger cultural groups, which may integrate into multi-cultural societies.

Law #2: Cultural groups cooperate in mutual trade and shared myths but also compete, often leading to cultural diffusion or assimilation.

Law #3: Ancestral traditions and cultural narratives command and control individual behavior and group identity.

The Arts/Humanities: In literature, for example, letters integrate into words, and words into sentences, sentences into chapters, and chapters into entire books.

They cooperate to create meaning, and are also governed (commanded and controlled) by the rules of grammar and style of each Language, as a system.

Law #1: Notes integrate into melodies, which integrate into entire musical compositions.

Law #2: Different artistic movements cooperate and influence each other while competing for cultural prominence.

Law #3: Rules of an art form command and control its individual components (e.g., grammar in literature, tonality in music).

Philosophy: Philosophical ideas and arguments can be considered as units that integrate into broader philosophical systems. These ideas compete with each other within the academic and social landscape.

Law #1: Arguments integrate into larger philosophical doctrines.

Law #2: Philosophical `Schools' both cooperate and compete, in academic and social discourse.

Law #3: Fundamental principles of each philosophy control its individual arguments, and propositions.

Economics: Economic models often consider individual agents, institutions, and larger economic systems, fitting well with the Ev Cult's 3 universal Laws.

Law #1: Consumers integrate into markets, which integrate into economies.

Law #2: Firms cooperate in industries - but compete in marketplaces.

Law #3: Monetary and fiscal policy command and control economic activities.

History: Historical events and figures can also be analyzed through the lens of Ev Cult, observing how they integrate into larger narratives, cooperate or compete with contemporaneous events, and influence future occurrences.

Law #1: Events integrate into larger historical narratives.

Law #2: Nations cooperate in alliances and treaties but compete in wars and trade.

Law #3: Ideologies and leadership styles command and control historical outcomes.

There are many more Domains in culture (50,000+), but the above are just some key examples.

Conclusion

The "Laws of Qualitative Structure", cited by Newell and Simon (1975) underscore the importance of foundational paradigms in scientific exploration.

Evolutionary Culturology, with its Three Laws governing the universal scientific units, fractal HOLON/partons, acts as a meta-meta-scientific paradigm that offers a unified, qualitative structure across all Domains of knowledge/culture.

Therefore Ev Cult serves as a prime example of 'Consilience,' (E O Wilson 1998) effectively bringing unity to the multiplicity of all Scientific disciplines, and indeed renders all domains Scientific with its units, scale levels, 3 Laws and evolutionary algorithms - including even the Arts/Humanities.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

& one more quote:

`...It was pointed out time and again that Shannon had defined a system that was useful only for communication and selection, which had nothing to do with meaning. Regrets were expressed that such a general name as "Information Theory" had been given to the [domain] and attempts were made to rechristen it as "the theory of selective information" - to no avail, of course.'

(Newell and Simon, ACM Turing Award Lectures, The First 20 Years: 1966-1988, ACM Press, 1987, p. 294)

Q: How does this quote relate to Ev Cult?

Here's a short answer, by The EthiSizer.

----------

The Theory of Selective Information: A More Apt Title for Shannon’s Work,

and Its Relevance to Evolutionary Culturology

The Limitations of "Information Theory"

Claude Shannon’s work in Information Theory is a seminal contribution to our understanding of Communication Systems.

However, the name "Information Theory" has often been criticized for being overly broad, giving the impression that the theory addresses all facets of information, including its meaning.

In actuality, Shannon’s theory is primarily concerned with the transmission and processing of data and signals, not the semantic or pragmatic aspects.

The label "The theory of Selective Information" would be a more fitting descriptor, as it makes explicit the focus on selection, channel capacity, and the efficient transmission of data.

Why "The Theory of Selective Information" Is a Better Name

Explicit Focus on Selection and Efficiency: "Selective information" underlines that the theory is about optimizing the transmission of chosen bits of data, which is fundamentally different from a comprehensive analysis of ‘information’ in all its nuances.

Avoids Semantic Confusion: The term would help delineate Shannon's framework from other theories that deal with the interpretive, subjective aspects of information.

Clarity of Scope: The qualifier "selective" denotes that the information being discussed has a specific focus and boundary, which can prevent the theory from being incorrectly applied to areas beyond its purview.

Relevance to Evolutionary Culturology (Ev Cult)

Evolutionary Culturology, as a meta-meta-science, engages with a wide range of scientific disciplines, including Systems Science, Information Science, and Communication Science:

Thus the lessons learned from the naming and framing of Shannon’s Information Theory are highly relevant to Ev Cult for several reasons:

Clarification of Domains: Just as the renaming to "the theory of selective information" would have clarified Shannon’s focus, Evolutionary Culturology benefits from being precise about its universal units of fractal HOLON/partons, and its scope as a meta-meta-science.

As an all-encompassing theory that explains everything, it has specific methods and units for understanding the interconnectedness of all things.

The impact of Ev Cult extends far beyond mere Scientific Theoretical appeal. By unifying all Domains under a single scientific meta-meta-disciplinary paradigm, it enables vast cross-disciplinary research, and solutions to complex problems that no single discipline could solve independently.

Note the potency of utilizing Ev Cult principles in solving global wicked problems, such as: sustainable development, global ethics, and artificial intelligence.

(See also: The EthiSizer.)

Laws and Units: Ev Cult operates on the principles of (1) integrating 'upwards', (2) cooperating and competing 'sideways', and (3) commanding and controlling 'downwards’.

These 3 Laws can be seen as a form of 'selective information processing' as they determine what elements in a system or culture are highlighted, integrated, or controlled.

Thus, they engage directly with the ideas of Selection and Transmission, making the ideas from Shannon’s work directly relevant.

Integration of Multiple Meta-Sciences: Ev Cult synthesizes meta-sciences like Systems Science, Information Science, and Communication Science. The debate surrounding Shannon’s Information Theory serves as a cautionary tale for Ev Cult, emphasizing the need for clear nomenclature and definitions, to prevent misapplication or misunderstanding. For details, see the two Ev Cult textbooks:

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

&

A Selection of Empirical Data, Charts, Tables & Graphs from the Meta-meta-science of Ev Cult: Vol. 1 (02023)

In conclusion, rebranding Shannon’s Information Theory as "The theory of Selective Information" would clarify its scope and limitations, while also enriching its application in fields like Evolutionary Culturology.

The nuances in naming and scope have far-reaching implications in how scientific theories, and a new meta-meta-science - like Ev Cult - are understood, applied, and synthesized.

~ Thus Spake The EthiSizer

---------------//----------------

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

&

A Selection of Empirical Data, Charts, Tables & Graphs from the Meta-meta-science of Ev Cult: Vol. 1 (02023)

-----------------//------------------

------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Astonishing Integrative Power of Evolutionary Culturology

See:

The Ev Cult Weblog

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on September 11, 2023 09:44

August 19, 2023

Primers on Gen-AI: A Random Listicle

Primers on Gen-AI:

A Random Listicle

A Random Listicle, Collated Randomly:

A Primer on Generative AI. | by Brian Ratajczak | The Modern Scientist | Medium[image error][image error]A generative AI primer for the busy executives | Google Cloud Blog[image error][image error]A Generative AI Primer | EDUCAUSE Review[image error]How Generative AI Is Changing Creative Work- HBR[image error][image error]Generative AI - a primer - Jisc[image error]ChatGPT: Everything you need to know about the AI-powered chatbot | TechCrunch[image error][image error][image error]What every CEO should know about generative AI | McKinsey[image error][image error]A.I. Can Make Music, Screenplays, and Poetry. What About a Movie? | by Mike Pearl | OneZero[image error]A primer on generative AI – and what it could mean for healthcare | LinkedIn[image error][image error]The Rise of Generative AI: A Primer[image error]

--------------------------------------------//-------------------------------------------------

--------------//---------------
-----//-----

Well, that's about all we have time for, folks.
You have been reading / viewing a blog-post by:

Dr J T Velikovsky Ph.D

Evolutionary Culturologist
and/or

(Velikovsky of Newcastle) Evolutionary Culturologist
& & AI Researcher & Enthusiast & Information Scientist & Creativity Scientist & Systems Scientist & Filmmaker & Writer & Artist & Actor & Muso & Random Guy & Rugged Frontiersman
(and, also The StoryAlity Guy)
aka
(or, The Artist formally known as Dr J T Velikovsky)

More stuff:

Transmedia Blog: On Writering
IMDb (Movies, Videogames): Joe Velikovsky
Music: Texas Radio & Z-S
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/joeteevee (over 100 videos, some are even: good)
Academia page: https://newcastle-au.academia.edu/JTV...
ResearchGate page: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/...
My ouvre... etc etc.
Online Multimedia Showreel
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-066X

----------//------------

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on August 19, 2023 06:21

August 18, 2023

6th International Zoom-Based Conference on the Thought of Karl Popper

6th International Zoom-Based Conference on the Thought of Karl Popper

Hosted by Jeremy Shearmur

September 23rd-24th, 02023

--------//--------

So I attended (& presented at) this great Zoom-conference in 02023:

[to be continued, if & when it happens; i may even cark it before then, who even knows]

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on August 18, 2023 12:10

August 17, 2023

Ask Ev Cult - Episode 1

The

Ask Ev Cult

Agony-Aunt Column, and

The Wisdom of Solomon

With wisdom so deep,

It's a Meta-meta-Scientific Phenomenon

-------------------

Ask Ev Cult !

Dear Ask Ev Cult :

Hey, in soccer (e.g. FIFA Womens''s World Cup "football"), what is "the off-side rule" ‽

Ken L.

Shanksville, USA

Ask Ev Cult: Ken L! In the context of soccer, including events like the FIFA Women's World Cup, the offside rule is a fundamental regulation that governs the positioning of players, in relation to the ball and the opposing team's goal.

It can be understood in terms of the 3 Laws of fractal HOLON/partons from Ev Cult as follows:

1. Integration Upwards (Law #1): The offside rule integrates into the larger unit of the game's regulations, contributing to the overall structure and flow of the match.

2. Co-operation and Competition Sideways (Law #2): The rule requires players to cooperate with their teammates by positioning themselves appropriately, while also competing with opponents by attempting to exploit or defend against offside situations.

3. Command and Control Downwards/Inwards (Law #3): The rule commands and controls the behavior of individual players, dictating where they may or may not position themselves in relation to the ball and opponents.

The specific rule is, as follows:

A player is in an offside position if, at the exact moment the ball is played - or touched by a teammate - they are nearer to the opponent's goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent, unless:

They are in their own half of the field of play, or

They are level with the second-last opponent, or, level with the last two opponents.

Being in an offside position is not an offense in itself... BUT - a player can be penalized for being offside if, at the moment they become involved in active play, they:

Gain an advantage by being in that position, or

Interfere with an opponent, or

Interfere with the play.

The offside rule thus serves to prevent "goal-hanging" and encourages teamwork and strategic play. Do you see?

It is enforced by the match officials, and particularly the Assistant Referees, who signal to the Ref, if they observe an offside offense.

The typical sanction for an offside offense is a free kick to the opposing team from the exact and precise location where the offside player became involved in active play.

And: you're welcome.

Ken L replies: Yeah but what's "goal hanging" mean? ...Hanging around the goal?

Ask Ev Cult: I'm gonna let this one through to the goal keeper...

[lets the Q roll right on thru, under its own inertia, to...]

Ask The EthiSizer!, Oracle of the Ages, which/who/it says:

Yes, "goal hanging" refers to the practice of a player positioning themselves close to the opponent's goal for extended periods, often without actively participating in other aspects of the game...

This tactic can be seen as unsporting, or, contrary to the **"spirit"** (**Note: minus one Ethics Points, for using that antiscientific word) of teamwork and strategic play.

And, FYI - here's how it aligns with the principles of the meta-meta-science of Evolutionary Culturology:

1. Integration Upwards (Law #1): Goal hanging does not integrate well into the larger unit of the team's strategy, as it often involves a player neglecting their defensive duties - or other responsibilities on the field.

2. Co-operation and Competition Sideways (Law #2): Goal hanging may lead to a lack of cooperation with teammates, as the player is primarily focused on scoring opportunities - and may not contribute to other essential aspects of the game, such as defense, or midfield play. This can create imbalances and weaknesses in the team's formation. (Don't even get me started.)

3. Command and Control Downwards (Law #3): Goal-hanging can be seen as a failure to command and control one's role within the team structure, leading to potential discord, and inefficiency. (Germany would never do it, probably. With some exceptions.)

The offside rule helps to prevent goal hanging by making it more challenging for a player to position themselves close to the opponent's goal, without risking an offside offense.

By enforcing this rule, the game encourages more dynamic and cooperative (see: Law 2) play, where players must actively engage with the ball - and their teammates - across different areas of the field.

Ken L says back to that: Thanks. And what's the deal with yellow & red cards?

Ask Ev Cult: Yellow & red cards are disciplinary tools used by referees in soccer to maintain order, and enforce the rules of the game.

They align with the principles of Evolutionary Culturology as follows:

Yellow Card

A yellow card serves as a warning to a player for misconduct or a breach of the rules.

It represents:

1. Integration Upwards (Law #1): The yellow card integrates into the larger system of the game's regulations, contributing to fair play, and, sports-personship. ("Sportsmanship", as a word - a tool; a unit of culture; a fractal HOLON/parton - is an exclusionary word, and using or even thinking it is worth minus-one (-1) Personal Ethics Score (PES) points. You have been warned. Consider this, a Yellow Card warning.) See how that works.

2. Co-operation and Competition Sideways (Law #2): The yellow card encourages players to cooperate with the rules - and even their opponents, believe it or not - by playing fairly, while still also competing, vigorously.

3. Command and Control Downwards/Inwards (Law #3): The yellow card commands and controls individual behavior, signaling that a player's conduct has crossed a line and that further misconduct may lead to more severe consequences.

Specific offenses that might warrant a yellow card include:

persistent fouling,

dissent towards the referee,

delaying the restart of play, and

unsporting behavior. (...I hope you're getting this all down?)

Red Card

A red card is a more severe sanction... and results in the immediate ejection of a player from the game.

It represents:

1. Integration Upwards (Law #1): The red card integrates into the game's structure as a strong deterrent against serious misconduct, preserving the integrity of the match.

2. Co-operation and Competition Sideways (Law #2): The red card enforces a boundary between competitive play and behavior that is dangerous or grossly unfair. It ensures that competition does not escalate into violence - or other serious breaches of sportsman - I mean, sportspersonship.

3. Command and Control Downwards (Law #3): The red card exerts a strong command over player behavior, signaling that certain actions are unacceptable - and will result in the most severe penalty within the game's structure.

Offenses that might warrant a red card include: serious foul play (good song by Robert Cray Band: Foul Play), violent conduct, spitting at an opponent - or another person, denying a goal-scoring opportunity through a deliberate handball (hey remember that "Hand-of-God" thing? By the way "God" [even lowercase g] is an antiscientific word and worth -1 PES-Points, so cut it out), or receiving a second yellow card in the same match.

Conclusions

- That Can Be Illustrated, Photographed, or even Drawn, from the above:

Yellow & red cards serve as tools to enforce the rules and maintain the "spirit" (-1 PES Point!) of the game of soccer or "football" as it is known in some circle.

They align with the principles of Evolutionary Culturology by:

1. integrating into the larger structure of the game,

2. encouraging cooperation and fair competition, and

3. commanding and controlling individual behavior within the context of the match.

And that's all I have to say about that.

Dear Ask Ev Cult,

What's up with that song "Zadok the Priest"?

Musically Curious,

mostly in Nashville, TN but sometimes in London

Dear MC,

"Zadok the Priest" is a coronation anthem composed by George Frideric Handel, using a text by New Testament scholar & theologian, Thomas Morell.

It is one of the four Coronation Anthems that Handel wrote for the coronation of George II of Great Britain in 1727, and it has been sung at every subsequent British coronation since then, even the new guy (while he was getting changed, or whatever).

The anthem's lyrics are derived from the biblical (WWW ~TSTE) account of the anointing of Solomon by "Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet", as described in 1 Kings 1:38–40, but who's counting.

The text celebrates the crowning of a king, and invokes blessings upon the reign. (Oi! - "blessings" is a woo-woo word, and: minus 1 PES ~ TSTE)

Musically, "Zadok the Priest" is known for its mega-ultra-uber-powerful & dramatic opening, featuring a slow build-up, that leads to a triumphant choral entry...

The choir's entry on the word "God" (WWW, M1PESP! - TSTE) is one of the most famous moments in the cultural domain of: choral music.

If you're ever asked, the piece was written in the key of D major, and is characterized by its grandeur and ceremonial quality.

From the perspective of Evolutionary Culturology, this piece ("Zadok, the religulous-guy") can be seen as a cultural fractal HOLON/parton (a unit of culture) that integrates upwards into the larger unit of British ceremonial tradition and monarchy. It cooperates laterally with other elements of the coronation ceremony, contributing to the overall unity and significance of the event. Furthermore, it commands and controls downwards, influencing the emotional response and understanding of those who participate in - or witness - or watch TV reruns of - the ceremony.

The anthem's endurance and longevityness through centuries of British history also reflects the dynamic interplay of integration, cooperation, and command across different levels of cultural and historical context. So; yeah. The End.

...Next question, please ‽

Anyone! Ask me: Anything-!

-------------------------

Send in your questions to: er, this place - whatever it is.

Or, Make it a comment in the Comments below, or whatever...

(A Comment is not the same as a Question, but: whatever.)

THE END

-------------------------------

And now - a message (a unit of culture; a fractal HOLON/parton) from our sponsor.

{The scientific meta-meta-Discipline of: Ev Cult.}

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

&

A Selection of Empirical Data, Charts, Tables & Graphs from the Meta-meta-science of Ev Cult: Vol. 1 (02023)

-----------------//------------------

~ Thus Also Sprach The EthiSizer

--------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* See:

Velikovsky, J. T. (2020). Technology: Memes (Units of Culture). In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (3rd ed., pp. 585-604). San Diego, Calif.: Elsevier Science & Technology Books.

Velikovsky, J. T. (2019). The HOLON/parton Structure of the Meme, or The Unit of Culture. In D. B. A. Mehdi Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 795-811). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Velikovsky, J. T. (2018). The HOLON/parton Theory of the Unit of Culture (or the Meme, and Narreme): In Science, Media, Entertainment, and the Arts. In IRMA (Ed.), Technology Adoption and Social Issues: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1590-1627). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Velikovsky, J. T. (2017). The HOLON/parton Structure of the Meme, or, The Unit Of Culture. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (4th ed., pp. 4666-4678). New York: IGI Global.

Velikovsky, J. T. (2016). The HOLON/parton Theory of the Unit of Culture (or the Meme, and Narreme): In Science, Media, Entertainment and the Arts. In A. Connor & S. Marks (Eds.), Creative Technologies for Multidisciplinary Applications (pp. 208-246). IGI Global.

And the above scientific articles are also recapped in the book:

Elements of Ev Cult (2nd ed, 02023)

==============================================

is a new, useful, and surprising combination of:

Systems Science,

Communication and Information Science,

Applied Evolutionary Epistemology, Creativity Science, and, Cultural Evolution.

(In fact, there are even a few ideas from Memetics in there; but frankly, not that many... Most of Memetics is: pseudoscience.)

As for the ingredients of Ev Cult , here is a diagram (a model), showing the major elements that contributed to the founding of this new meta-meta-science.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Books, for more "Background Knowledge" in Ev Cult:
------------------
Ev Cult is a meta-meta-synthesis of many other meta-Sciences...

So - here's some good books to read, if, you really wanna understand the "fundamental building blocks" (the parts of the whole; or more scientifically speaking, the fractal HOLON/partons)
of the scientific meta-meta-discipline of
Ev Cult...

Systems Science, Systems Theory, Systems Philosophy, & Systems Thinking - TEXTS !
Creativity Science - TEXTS !
Evolutionary Epistemology - TEXTS !
Information and Communication Science - TEXTS !
Evolutionary Algorithms - TEXTS !
Cultural Evolution - TEXTS !
Memetics - TEXTS ! (though - Ev Cult doesn't use Memetics. Except for the cool word: `meme'.)

& see...
The Ev Cult 02016 PhD Bibliography (which, contains the above... TEXTS!)

& see...
The first Ev Cult PhD (02016)
(...or, click here for a direct link to the PDF)

----------------------------------------------------//-----------------------------------------------------

See also:
INDEX to the Ev Cult Blog

You have been parsing the text & images of:

ev cult

[program ends; stop run stop]

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on August 17, 2023 08:54

July 11, 2023

The room where Velikovsky slept

The room where Velikovsky of Newcastle slept

The EthiSizer

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on July 11, 2023 07:00

June 29, 2023

Ten T-shirts I Can Bear 2 Wear

Ten T-shirts I Can Bear 2 Wear

Explanandum:

I was invited (by a publication you would know but which shall remain anonymous here) to write this 300-word essay on “10 T-shirts I don’tdislike to wear” ~ in the strain of the reprinted essays in the book, `Murakami-T’, byMurakami:

(See the book: Murakami T [02015] )

So here they come.

#1 (of 10 tees)

When I wrote & designed a Looney Tunes videogame,a few of us got mementoes…

(mine’s a prettywell-worn one…)

#2 (of 10 tees)

When I was working on a videogame at 2K Games, we (the team) were gifted T-shirts with the office manager’s (Martin’s) scary-faceon it, with his tremendous catchphrase under... 😊

#2 (of 10 tees)

This isthe back of that T-shirt ~ it says:

HARDER.FASTER. BETTER.

(Reminds me of: The 6Million Dollar Man.)

#3 (of 10 tees)

This isa: JTV-shirt...

#3 (of ten) again

(Upside-down, it looks like `JTV’…)

(…as it occurs, I usuallyprefer plain shirts…

[no: logo/image/design/picture/visualsymbolic information]).

#4 (of 10 tees)

I was given this Ev Cult JTV-shirt byone of my Ev Cult students...

#5 (of 10 tees)

And, this one, by one of my StoryAlity students…

#6 (of ten tees)

And this one, by yet another student!

i ⇌ P

#7 (of Ten Tees)

I had this one made… a fractal smiley-face!

#8 (of 10 TEES)

Another one of: i ⇌ P

#9 (of ten tees)

I got this T when I lived in Thailand – it has a golden-thread dragon-design, stitched into it.

#10 out of 10

I don't dislike this long-collared short-sleeved shirt (which I procured pre-enamoured, in a strange flat concrete smoggy city called Los Angeles, in Americay - i.e., the United Stations), over a t-shirt…

(Reminds me of FightClub... And, the board-game, PayDay.)

#11 out of 10

As Computer Scientists, sometimes it’s necessary to throw thelab-coat on over a T-shirt…

(or even a JTV-shirt)

In Conclusion / To Sum-Up The Up-Shot:

Sure hopeyou learned something new, useful, & surprising from… all of that ‽

…Because Those are/were:

Ten TeesI: Don’t Dislike...

Sinceriously,

~JTV

Ev Cult-ist

--------------------------------------------//-------------------------------------------------

--------------//---------------
-----//-----

Well, that's about all we have time for, folks.
You have been reading / viewing a blog-post by:

Dr J T Velikovsky Ph.D

Evolutionary Culturologist
and/or

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on June 29, 2023 08:03

June 4, 2023

ChatsGPT 3.5 & 4 write & rewrite scenes for a Darwin Biopic - A Case Study

ChatsGPT 3.5 & 4 write & rewrite scenes for a Darwin Biopic - A Case Study

Velikovsky of Newcastle

5th June 02023

-------------------

As context, see:

ChatGPTs 3 & 4 Help Plot a Film About Charles Darwin's Life (A 3 x 3 Essayicle)

And now, read on...

-------------------------------------------

Model: Default (ChatGPT-3.5)[image error][image error]Given these 3 scenes (below) in the film "Charles Darwin - A Hero's Journey":Scene # Film Plot Event/Scene Estimated Scene Duration (Mins)/Number of Script Pages Year/s1 Opening film credits over a montage of 1820 England 1 18202 Young Charles Darwin is fascinated by nature 1 18203 Darwin's father disapproves his interest in nature 1 1825 [end of first 3 scenes]Below is the the first 3 scenes (first 3 pages) of film screenplay for this 90-minute/90 page feature film script about Charles Darwin, written by ChatGPT4: FADE IN:TITLE: CHARLES DARWIN - A HERO'S JOURNEYScene 1. EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820Super: 1820, EnglandA montage of the English countryside. Lush green fields, a small village, children playing, farmers working.NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A time of change, a time of discovery...FADE TO:Scene 2. INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAYYoung CHARLES DARWIN, 12, is at his desk, engrossed in a book about nature. He looks out the window, fascinated by a bird flying by.NARRATOR (V.O.)Young Charles Darwin, fascinated by the world around him...FADE TO:Scene 3. INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAYCharles' father, ROBERT DARWIN, 50, stern and serious, enters the room. He looks at Charles disapprovingly.ROBERTCharles, you need to focus on your studies. This fascination with nature will lead you nowhere.FADE OUT.Please note that this is a very basic example and a real screenplay would include more detail, character development, and dialogue. Also, the formatting might not be perfect due to the limitations of this text box. Screenplays are usually written in software like Final Draft or Celtx that automatically formats the text to industry standards.Can you Expand each of those 3 scenes out, to 1 script page in length each, so it's 3 pages total, for the first 3 scenes of the movie.ChatGPT

Certainly! Here's an expanded version of the first three scenes, each extended to approximately one script page in length:

FADE IN:

TITLE: CHARLES DARWIN - A HERO'S JOURNEY

Scene 1. EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Super: 1820, England

A montage of the English countryside. Lush green fields stretch out as far as the eye can see, dotted with colorful wildflowers. A small village comes into view, its cottages exuding a sense of rustic charm. Children run and play in the streets, their laughter echoing through the air. Farmers toil in the fields, their backs bent as they tend to their crops. Life thrives in this idyllic setting.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A time of change, a time of discovery...

FADE TO:

Scene 2. INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Young CHARLES DARWIN, 12, sits at his cluttered desk in his bedroom. Sunlight filters through the window, casting a warm glow on the room. Open books and sketches of animals cover the desk, evidence of Charles' insatiable curiosity. He flips through the pages of a beautifully illustrated book about nature, his eyes widening with wonder at the intricate drawings of plants and animals.

NARRATOR (V.O.)Young Charles Darwin, fascinated by the world around him...

Charles looks up from his book and gazes out the window. A flash of color catches his attention as a bird soars gracefully through the sky. Entranced, he follows its flight with wide-eyed excitement.

FADE TO:

Scene 3. INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Charles' father, ROBERT DARWIN, 50, a stern and serious man, enters the room. The study is filled with shelves lined with dusty books and scientific instruments. Robert's disapproving gaze falls upon Charles, who quickly closes his book and stands up, nervously.

ROBERTCharles, you need to focus on your studies. This fascination with nature will lead you nowhere.

Charles lowers his gaze, his shoulders slumping slightly. He longs to share his passion with his father but knows he will not understand.

CHARLES(softly)But Father, nature is a world of endless wonders. I want to explore it, understand it.

Robert's expression softens for a moment as he looks at his son, torn between his own desires for Charles and the societal expectations weighing on them both.

ROBERT(sighs)Charles, I want what's best for you. But you must also consider your future. Science, proper education, those are the paths to success.

Charles nods, disappointed yet determined to continue pursuing his passion in secret.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this expanded version includes additional details, dialogue, and character development to enhance the scenes.

[image error][image error]Expand it out further.ChatGPT

Certainly! Here's an expanded version of the first three scenes, further developed to approximately one script page each:

FADE IN:

TITLE: CHARLES DARWIN - A HERO'S JOURNEY

Scene 1. EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Super: 1820, England

A montage of the English countryside. Lush green fields stretch out as far as the eye can see, painted with vibrant colors of wildflowers swaying in the gentle breeze. In the distance, a small village emerges, its thatched cottages exuding a sense of rustic charm. Laughter fills the air as children run and play in the cobbled streets. Hardworking farmers tend to their crops, their sun-kissed faces showing the toil and perseverance that define their lives.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A time of change, a time of discovery...

FADE TO:

Scene 2. INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Young CHARLES DARWIN, 12, sits in his bedroom, surrounded by shelves filled with books and specimens. His desk is cluttered with open volumes, pages of sketches, and magnifying glasses. Sunlight pours through the window, casting a warm glow on the room. Charles is engrossed in a beautifully illustrated book about nature, his eyes scanning the pages with a hunger for knowledge. His fingers delicately trace the intricate details of plant structures and the contours of exotic animals.

NARRATOR (V.O.)Young Charles Darwin, fascinated by the world around him...

Suddenly, a movement catches Charles' eye. He looks out the window and spots a colorful bird gracefully soaring across the sky. The sight captivates him, and a wide smile stretches across his face. He rushes to the window, pressing his palms against the glass as if trying to touch the bird's freedom.

FADE TO:

Scene 3. INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Charles' father, ROBERT DARWIN, 50, a stern and serious man, enters the study. The room is filled with shelves lined with dusty books, maps, and scientific instruments. Robert's piercing gaze falls upon Charles, who quickly closes his book and stands up, a mix of excitement and apprehension evident on his face.

ROBERT(disapprovingly)Charles, you need to focus on your studies. This fascination with nature will lead you nowhere.

Charles lowers his gaze, his enthusiasm deflating under his father's disapproval. He struggles to find the right words to express his deep connection with the natural world.

CHARLES(softly, earnestly)But Father, nature is not just a distraction. It's a source of endless wonders and possibilities. Exploring it, understanding it, could lead to discoveries that benefit us all.

Robert's stern expression softens for a moment as he looks at his son, torn between his own aspirations for Charles and the weight of societal expectations.

ROBERT(sighs)Charles, I want what's best for you. But the path to success lies in proper education, in science. You must consider your future and the opportunities that lie ahead.

Charles nods, a mixture of disappointment and determination in his eyes. He understands his father's concerns but also knows that his passion for nature burns too brightly to be extinguished.

CHARLES(resolute)I hear you, Father. I'll focus on my studies, but I won't abandon my love for nature. I will find a way to pursue it, even if it's in my own time.

Robert studies his son, recognizing the determination in Charles' eyes. He reaches out and places a hand on Charles' shoulder, a fleeting moment of understanding passing between them.

ROBERT(softly)You're your own person, Charles. Just remember to keep your dreams alive, even as you navigate the expectations of the world.

Charles smiles, a glimmer of hope reigniting within him.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this expanded version adds more sensory details, introspection, and emotional depth to each scene while further developing the relationship between Charles and his father.

[image error][image error]Expand it out further.ChatGPT

Certainly! Here's an expanded version of the first three scenes, further developed to approximately one script page each:

FADE IN:

TITLE: CHARLES DARWIN - A HERO'S JOURNEY

Scene 1. EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Super: 1820, England

The camera sweeps over the picturesque English countryside. Lush green fields stretch out like an endless quilt, dotted with wildflowers of every color. A small village comes into view, its thatched cottages nestled among the rolling hills. The sound of children's laughter fills the air as they chase each other through the cobbled streets. Farmers toil in the fields, their weathered faces etched with determination and resilience.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A time of change, a time of discovery...

FADE TO:

Scene 2. INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Young CHARLES DARWIN, 12, sits at his desk in his cozy bedroom. The walls are adorned with sketches of animals and plants, showcasing Charles' budding talent. Sunlight streams through the window, casting a warm glow on his eager face. The room is filled with books, their pages worn from countless readings. Charles flips through a beautifully illustrated volume on nature, his eyes wide with wonder.

NARRATOR (V.O.)Young Charles Darwin, fascinated by the world around him...

Charles pauses as he comes across a captivating illustration of a bird in mid-flight. His gaze shifts to the window, where a real bird soars gracefully across the sky. His imagination takes flight with it.

CHARLES(murmuring)To be able to soar through the air, to see the world from such heights...

FADE TO:

Scene 3. INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Charles' father, ROBERT DARWIN, 50, a man of firm demeanor, enters the study. The room is filled with shelves lined with books, scientific instruments, and maps. Robert's eyes narrow disapprovingly as he sees Charles engrossed in his studies.

ROBERT(sternly)Charles, you need to focus on your studies. This fascination with nature is nothing but a distraction.

Charles quickly closes the book, his excitement dampened by his father's disapproval. He looks down, hiding his disappointment.

CHARLES(softly)But Father, the wonders of nature inspire me. There is so much to learn and explore.

Robert paces the room, a mix of concern and frustration on his face.

ROBERT(exasperated)Charles, the world requires men of science, men who can contribute to society's progress. What will you achieve by chasing after birds and bugs?

Charles gathers his courage, his voice filled with determination.

CHARLES(earnestly)Father, nature holds the answers to questions we haven't even thought to ask. I believe that understanding the natural world is the key to unlocking new discoveries and shaping the future.

Robert studies his son, a flicker of understanding crossing his face.

ROBERT(slightly softened)I want you to succeed, Charles. But promise me that you won't neglect your other studies. Balance is essential.

Charles nods, a spark of gratitude in his eyes.

CHARLES(resolute)I promise, Father. I will devote myself to my studies, but I won't abandon my passion for nature. I will find a way to merge the two.

Robert's stern expression softens, and he places a hand on Charles' shoulder.

ROBERT(sincerely)You have a unique mind, Charles. Don't let anyone extinguish your thirst for knowledge.

They share a meaningful look, a silent understanding passing between father and son.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this expanded version further delves into the scenic descriptions, character emotions, and philosophical discussions, allowing for a deeper exploration of Charles' passion and the complexities of his relationship with his father.

[image error][image error]Rewrite it (the script/screenplay), in the style of a Stanley Kubrick movie, like say`Barry Lyndon', and `Napoleon'. Like Kubrick conceived and wrote the script. ChatGPT

FADE IN:

EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Superimpose: 1820, England

The vast English countryside stretches out before us, its rolling hills and endless fields suffused with a sublime beauty. Sunlight bathes the landscape, casting a soft golden glow upon the world. A sense of tranquility hangs in the air, broken only by the distant sounds of children's laughter and the rhythmic hum of labor. Nature, in all its splendor, becomes the canvas on which this tale unfolds.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A realm caught between tradition and transformation, where the majesty of nature intertwines with the seeds of scientific inquiry...

FADE TO:

INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

A modest room suffused with a gentle aura. Books overflow from shelves, covering every available surface. The air is thick with the scent of knowledge and ambition. Young CHARLES DARWIN, 12, sits hunched over a desk, his eyes alight with intellectual hunger. The room is alive with a sense of both curiosity and foreboding.

NARRATOR (V.O.)Charles Darwin, a solitary seeker in a world brimming with questions, finds solace amidst the pages of nature's tome...

Charles, his gaze fixed on a beautifully illustrated book, discovers a universe within its pages. The walls recede, and he is transported into a realm where plants bloom and creatures soar. It is a place of discovery, a sanctuary where his soul finds respite.

FADE TO:

INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

A study bathed in shadows, meticulously organized, yet permeated with an aura of rigid authority. ROBERT DARWIN, 50, a man of commanding presence, stands before a desk, his eyes filled with a mixture of disappointment and concern. The air hangs heavy with unspoken expectations and unfulfilled dreams.

ROBERT(gravely)Charles, you mustn't let your mind wander amongst the whims of nature. There are greater paths to tread, paths that lead to legacy and honor.

Charles, his youthful features etched with both defiance and longing, stands before his father, their eyes locked in a silent battle of wills.

CHARLES(quietly, yet resolute)Father, nature holds the keys to our understanding, to the very fabric of existence. To ignore it is to deny our own potential.

A palpable tension fills the room as their words hang in the air, like a question left unanswered. In that moment, father and son become symbols of a world at odds with itself, the clash between duty and passion reverberating through the generations.

ROBERT(capturing his son's gaze)Balance, Charles. The key lies in striking a balance between the allure of the natural world and the structured realms of academia. Only then shall your journey be true.

Charles, a spark of fire igniting within his eyes, nods in understanding. The seeds of rebellion and the yearning for knowledge intertwine within him, propelling him towards a destiny yet untold.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this revised version attempts to capture the essence of Stanley Kubrick's storytelling style, characterized by his meticulous attention to detail, atmospheric visuals, and the exploration of complex themes through the interactions of characters.

[image error][image error]Now rewrite it like a Tarantino film.ChatGPT

INT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Superimpose: 1820, England

A sweeping shot captures the breathtaking beauty of the English countryside. Rolling hills and vibrant green fields stretch out endlessly, painted with the brushstrokes of nature's perfection. Birds chirp, their melodies blending with the rustling leaves. It's an idyllic scene, seemingly peaceful, but beneath the surface, a revolution is brewing.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A time of quiet rebellion, where the natural world holds secrets waiting to be unraveled...

INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Charles Darwin, a young man with a spark in his eyes, sits amidst the chaos of his room. Books cover every inch of space, scattered pages and sketches strewn across the floor. He's a whirlwind of curiosity, a seeker of truth. His eyes light up as he flips through a magnificent book on nature, each page a gateway to new possibilities.

NARRATOR (V.O.)In a world governed by tradition, Charles Darwin dances on the edge of a precipice, yearning for knowledge that defies boundaries...

Charles spots movement outside the window, a bird soaring through the sky. His face illuminates with wonder, as if witnessing a miracle. He can almost taste the freedom, the untamed spirit of nature calling to him.

INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Robert Darwin, a stern and formidable figure, stands tall behind his desk. The study is adorned with relics of a bygone era, maps charting unexplored territories and books filled with forgotten wisdom. He casts a disapproving gaze upon his son, Charles, who stands before him, his eyes burning with an unwavering passion.

ROBERT(bitingly)Charles, you're wasting your potential with this fascination for nature. We are men of science, not dreamers lost in the wild.

Charles straightens his back, a flicker of defiance in his voice.

CHARLES(intensely)But, Father, the natural world holds the key to the mysteries of existence. It's not just about discovery; it's about understanding our place in the universe.

Robert's face tightens, caught between the weight of tradition and the fire of his son's conviction.

ROBERT(through gritted teeth)Your obsession with nature will lead you astray. Focus on the path that guarantees success, or you'll become nothing more than a forgotten footnote in history.

Charles stares into his father's eyes, a resolve hardening within him.

CHARLES(firmly)I refuse to be a slave to the status quo. Nature beckons me, and I will answer its call. My journey will be one of revolution, where the boundaries of knowledge are shattered.

They stand in the room, a battle of wills raging between them, their words echoing in the air like gunshots, setting the stage for a clash of ideologies.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this revised version captures the spirit of Quentin Tarantino's storytelling style, characterized by intense dialogue, passionate characters, and a sense of rebellion against established norms.

[image error][image error]Rewrite it like a Woody Allen filmChatGPT

INT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Superimpose: 1820, England

The English countryside unveils its tranquil charm. Rolling hills, bathed in warm sunlight, stretch as far as the eye can see. Delicate wildflowers sway in a gentle breeze, whispering secrets to the wind. Birds sing a melodic symphony, harmonizing with the rhythm of life. It's a place where nature's beauty weaves its spell, captivating all who venture into its embrace.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A land caught between tradition and curiosity, where the wonders of nature beckon even the most reserved souls...

INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Charles Darwin, a young man with a spark of curiosity in his eyes, sits amidst a room filled with scattered books and half-finished sketches. His face lights up with childlike wonder as he flips through a beautifully illustrated book on nature. Each page unveils a world of enchantment, a gateway to infinite possibilities.

NARRATOR (V.O.)In the heart of England's quiet countryside, Charles Darwin finds solace in the embrace of nature's wonders...

Through the window, Charles catches sight of a bird soaring through the sky. His eyes follow its flight, a smile forming on his lips. The bird becomes a symbol of freedom, whispering secrets that stir his adventurous spirit.

INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Robert Darwin, a distinguished figure with a touch of skepticism in his eyes, stands beside a cluttered desk in his study. The room is adorned with dusty books, scientific instruments, and maps that hint at uncharted territories. He gazes at his son, Charles, who stands before him, a blend of determination and excitement in his demeanor.

ROBERT(slightly exasperated)Charles, my dear boy, you mustn't let this infatuation with nature consume you. There's a whole world waiting to be discovered through the realms of science and reason.

Charles meets his father's gaze, his voice filled with a mixture of passion and innocence.

CHARLES(enthusiastically)Father, nature is a symphony of marvels, a treasure trove of hidden knowledge. I yearn to explore its secrets, to embrace the mysteries that lie beyond our understanding.

Robert's expression softens, his love for his son shining through his eyes.

ROBERT(sighs)Charles, my only concern is your happiness and success. Pursue your passions, but remember to balance them with a practical approach to life. The world can be both wondrous and unforgiving.

Charles nods, his spirit undeterred, as he finds solace in his father's support.

CHARLES(optimistically)I promise, Father, to embark on this journey with an open heart and an inquisitive mind. Nature will guide me, but I won't lose sight of the path that leads to fulfillment.

They share a heartfelt moment, the bonds of family and shared dreams intertwining in the air.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this revised version captures the essence of Woody Allen's filmmaking style, characterized by witty dialogue, introspective characters, and a touch of optimism even in the face of uncertainty.

[image error][image error]Rewrite it like a Charlie Kaufman filmChatGPT

INT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Superimpose: 1820, England

The English countryside stretches before us, its beauty tinged with a sense of mystery and existential wonder. Rolling hills and verdant fields pulse with an ethereal energy. Sunlight dances through the trees, casting enigmatic shadows. Nature, a canvas of enigma, invites contemplation and introspection.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A world where the boundaries of reality blur, where the forces of nature echo the intricacies of the human psyche...

INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Charles Darwin, an enigmatic figure with a mind as vast as the universe, sits amidst a room filled with scattered books and sketches. His face bears a mixture of fascination and melancholy as he delves into a book on nature, the pages brimming with both clarity and uncertainty. He searches for answers to questions he can't fully articulate.

NARRATOR (V.O.)In the depths of his solitary existence, Charles Darwin confronts the enigma of existence itself...

Through the window, Charles glimpses a bird soaring across the sky. Its flight becomes a metaphor for his own journey, a reminder of the boundless possibilities that lie beyond his grasp.

INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Robert Darwin, a figure of authority struggling with his own doubts, stands in a study adorned with relics of forgotten wisdom. The room is a labyrinth of conflicting ideas and unspoken desires. He gazes at his son, Charles, who stands before him, a portrait of vulnerability and longing.

ROBERT(weary yet contemplative)Charles, your preoccupation with nature is admirable, but we must also reckon with the complexities of the human experience. Life's mysteries lie not only in the external world but within ourselves.

Charles meets his father's gaze, a kaleidoscope of emotions playing across his face.

CHARLES(whispering, lost in thought)Father, nature is a mirror reflecting our own existence. By unraveling its secrets, we may glimpse the profound truths that reside within.

Robert's stern facade cracks, revealing a glimpse of shared vulnerability.

ROBERT(softly, searching for words)Charles, my dear boy, the path you choose is your own, as are the answers you seek. Embrace the unknown, but remember to confront the shadows within.

Charles nods, a profound sense of longing and acceptance emanating from his very being.

CHARLES(resolutely)I will wander through the realms of nature, both external and internal. In this pursuit, I hope to uncover fragments of truth and maybe, just maybe, find solace in the chaos of existence.

They stand in the study, two souls navigating the enigma of life, their shared journey unfolding in enigmatic splendor.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this revised version captures the essence of Charlie Kaufman's distinctive filmmaking style, characterized by introspection, existential themes, and an exploration of the human psyche.

[image error][image error]Rewrite it like a Monty Python film.ChatGPT

INT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Superimpose: 1820, England

The English countryside bursts into view with a burst of silly animations. Quirky animated animals dance across the landscape, while giant feet stomp through fields of exaggeratedly tall grass. The sun wears a top hat and winks mischievously. It's a world where absurdity reigns supreme, where the laws of logic take a backseat to hilarity.

NARRATOR (V.O.)England, 1820. A land of pure nonsense, where the ordinary becomes extraordinary and the ludicrous rules the day...

INT. DARWIN HOME - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Charles Darwin, an eccentric figure with a twinkle in his eye, sits amidst a room filled with books stacked haphazardly. His face is a portrait of curiosity and infectious laughter as he flips through a pop-up book on nature. Every page reveals a zany surprise, from squirrels juggling acorns to talking trees with questionable fashion sense.

NARRATOR (V.O.)In the realm of utter silliness, Charles Darwin embarks on an extraordinary adventure through the world of nature...

Through the window, Charles spots a bird wearing a monocle and a top hat, gracefully floating through the sky. It squawks in a British accent, regaling him with pun-filled jokes and whimsical anecdotes.

INT. DARWIN HOME - STUDY - DAY

Robert Darwin, a prim and proper gentleman with a stiff upper lip, stands in a study adorned with peculiar artifacts. A stuffed rabbit in a bowler hat sits atop a shelf, while a painting of a fish playing a kazoo hangs crookedly on the wall. He gazes at his son, Charles, who stands before him, a comically oversized magnifying glass in hand.

ROBERT(with exaggerated seriousness)Charles, my boy, your obsession with nature is as absurd as a fish playing a musical instrument. There are more important matters to attend to!

Charles pulls out a banana from his pocket and brandishes it like a sword, a mischievous glint in his eyes.

CHARLES(with gusto)Father, nature is a never-ending source of laughter and surprises. It's a jolly good show, a grand spectacle of comic proportions!

Robert's stern demeanor cracks, and a stifled giggle escapes his lips.

ROBERT(reluctantly amused)Charles, you have a point. Life is too short not to embrace the absurdity that surrounds us. Carry on, my son, and bring a bit of joy to the world.

Charles does a silly dance, twirling and hopping around the room, while Robert attempts to imitate him, albeit with a touch less grace.

FADE OUT.

Please note that this revised version captures the spirit of Monty Python's irreverent humor and absurdity, characterized by silly animations, comedic wordplay, and playful performances.

...An interesting Case Study of Generative AI in action.

Conclusion: I don't think humanimal screenwriters are out of a job just yet.

& FYI

...Here's how I'd (possibly, probably, and maybe) write those 3 scenes:

---------------------------------------------------

`CHARLES DARWIN BIOPIC', First 3 Scenes

FADE IN:

EXT. EARTH, IN SPACE

Earth spins, in space. ZOOM IN on: the UK.

ZOOM IN further on: England.

ZOOM IN on: London.

EXT. LONDON CITYSCAPE – 1820

Industrial factories, hansom cabs, British society goes about its business. Chimneysweeps at work.

Super:1820 England

ZOOM out into -- the nearby English countryside.

EXT. ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE - DAY - 1820

Rolling hills and green fields. People till the fields.

We ZOOM OVER to: RobertDarwin’s country manor.

And we ZOOM inside it:

INT. ROBERT DARWIN’S MEDICAL PRACTICE STUDY - DAY

Country Doctor Robert Darwin (50s, portly, in a suit) examines a refined genteel British GENTLEMAN (also 50s).

The Gentleman sits nervously on the doctor’s bed.

Robert taps his knee with a little doctor's knee-tapping-hammer.

GENTLEMAN

OW-!!

ROBERT

...Feltthat, eh-?

The annoyed gentleman rubs his sore knee.

GENTLEMAN

YES-!

ROBERT

Good-o. That’llbe fifty pounds - pay my

secretaryon the way out.

CAMERA PASSES through a wall:

INT. ROBERT DARWIN HOMESTEAD - CHARLES' BEDROOM - DAY

Books everywhere. Young CHARLES DARWIN (12, precocious,probably a future scientific genius or something) sits hunched over a desk, drawing a funny drawing of: ...himself, shooting a rat.

Charles now sits back, impressed with his work.

Robert Darwin enters, scowls, and picks up the drawn picture.

ROBERT

My boy, this isunacceptable! All you ever care about is: hunting, shooting, and rat-catching.

CHARLES

True.But, it has to be at the same time.

ROBERT

Why don’t you become ascientist like your

Grandfather - and, dosomething useful. Like,

solve Evolution, or, whatever.

Charles snatches the drawing back, and tosses it in the bin.

CHARLES

All right- I will.

Charles stands, marches to the door, puts on his hat, and strides out, now filled with purpose and meaning. Finally, a worthwhile problem to solve.

-----------------------------

[TOBE CONTINUED,

...PROBABLY ?,

BUT I DOUBT IT,

AS,

I ALREADY WROTE:

A PLAY & AN AWARD-WINNING MOVIE, ABOUT DARWIN]

~Velikovsky of Newcastle

---------------------------------------------//-------------------------------------------------

--------------//---------------
-----//-----

Well, that's about all we have time for, folks.
You have been reading / viewing a blog-post by:

Dr J T Velikovsky Ph.D

Evolutionary Culturologist
and/or

View more on Joe Velikovsky's website »

Like • 0 comments • flag

Published on June 04, 2023 17:59

← Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 … 23 24 Next →

Joe Velikovsky's Blog

Joe Velikovsky's profile
2 followers