Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 648

October 26, 2021

New Zealand moving to two-tier society, but the unvaccinated already a global underclass

Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand prime minister, during youth vaccination festival.

Anne Gulland

The Telegraph

New Zealand’s Covid policy has once again hit the headlines. Last week, Jacinda Ardern, the prime minister, admitted that its new plans on loosening restrictions risked turning the country into a “two-tier” society.

Under the “traffic light” policy, those who are vaccinated will be able to move around and use services relatively freely, while the unjabbed will not.

But this policy is not confined to the Pacific island nation: vaccine passes are gaining traction around the world as countries introduce greater freedoms for those who are immunised, risking the creation of an unvaccinated underclass.

Perhaps one of the most eye-opening vaccine mandates under consideration is in Austria, where the number of cases is climbing again – and those who are unjabbed risk being confined to their homes.

On Friday, Alexander Schallenberg, the country’s chancellor,warned that if the number of Covid patients in Austria’s intensive care units exceeds 600 – or a third of the country’s total ICU capacity – those who have not been vaccinated will be forced into lockdown and will only be able to leave their homes under specific circumstances.

This is one of the more extreme options under consideration, but other countries are also becoming less afraid of interfering in their citizens’ lives in a bid to ensure high vaccine rates.

[…]

Via https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/new-zealand-moving-two-tier-society-unvaccinated-already-underclass/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 26, 2021 15:32

Health Care Workers Speak Out on Why They Would Rather Lose Their Jobs Than Take a COVID-19 Vaccine


Frontline health workers have direct experience with Covid’s low mortality and the horrendous side effects of Covid vaccines.


A nurse draws a vaccine dose from a vial in Bowie, Md., on March 25, 2021. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)


1EarthUnited

Doctors and nurses, clinicians are quitting rather than taking the clot shot. Do they know something that you don’t….

and should you be concerned?

By Enrico Trigoso October 25, 2021 Updated: October 26, 2021

Despite the COVID-19 vaccines having been promoted as safe and effective by legacy media, manyhealth care workersare refusing to take them, and those who openly speak out about their concerns get censored by Big Tech companies or kicked off their platforms.

Some nurses and doctors are refusing vaccine mandates even if their refusal will cost them their jobs.

The Epoch Times reached out to some of these health care professionals to see why.

‘Impossible to Give FullyInformed Consent’

Emily Nixon is a registered nurse who has been working in the health industry for 18 years. When heremployer, MaineHealth,announced that it would make the vaccine mandatory, she quickly organized a group calledThe Coalition for Healthcare Workers…

View original post 1,501 more words

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 26, 2021 13:12

Aspirin found to greatly decrease covid hospitalizations

Aspirin found to greatly decrease covid hospitalizations

Dr Eddy Betterman

New research out of George Washington University (GWU) has found that over-the-counter aspirin could help to protect the lungs of patients who test “positive” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).

An investigative team looked at more than 400 Chinese Virus patients from hospitals across the United States who take aspirin for some other unrelated purpose. Compared to patients who do not take the drug, aspirin users were found to have:

• A 44 percent decreased risk of requiring mechanical ventilation
• A 43 percent decreased risk of needing to be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU)
and
• A 47 percent decreased risk of dying in a hospital

“As we learned about the connection between blood clots and COVID-19, we knew that aspirin – used to prevent stroke and heart attack – could be important for COVID-19 patients,” announced Dr. Jonathan Chow from GWU.

“Our research found an association between low-dose aspirin and decreased severity of COVID-19 and death.”

It has been known for some time that low-dose aspirin helps to thin the blood, which in turn can protect against blood clotting issues like a stroke. For people who have had a heart attack or a myocardial infection, taking low-dose aspirin regularly can help protect them against further complications.

Even though the Fauci Flu largely affects the respiratory system, it is also associated with blood clotting, particularly in small blood vessels.

These clots cause tiny blockages in the pulmonary blood system, potentially leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Taking low-dose aspirin reduces risk of covid infection by 29 percent

Researchers from the Barzilai Medical Center in Israel came to a similar conclusion about aspirin back in March when they tested its effects on Chinese Flu-related blood clots.

What they determined is that aspirin carries with it certain immunological benefits that in and of itself are anti-covid. Taking low-dose aspirin as a healthy person, scientists found, can help reduce the risk of contracting the Wuhan Flu by about 29 percent.

“Aspirin is low cost, easily accessible and millions are already using it to treat their health conditions,” Chow added. “Finding this association is a huge win for those looking to reduce risk from some of the most devastating effects of COVID-19.”

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2021/10/27/aspirin-found-to-greatly-decrease-covid-hospitalizations/

 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 26, 2021 13:04

Yale Epidemiology Professor Dr. Harvey Risch says he would pull a healthy child out of public school and homeschool before he gave them this vaccine

The Covid death rate in healthy children is virtually zero. It makes absolutely no sense to give them a risky vaccine that doesn’t prevent them from transmitting Covid.

Tales from the Conspiratum


Yale Epidemiologist and early COVID-19 treatment authority Dr. Harvey Risch. https://t.co/UB6PKuJ6Qd


— James Lyons-Weiler (@lifebiomedguru) October 25, 2021


View original post

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 26, 2021 12:31

October 25, 2021

CHD to Sue FDA for ‘Recklessly Endangering’ Children if Agency Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for Children 5 to 11 Years Old

CHD said it will take legal action against the FDA if the agency grants EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children aged 5-11.By Children’s Health Defense Team

An advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will meet Tuesday to consider emergency authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for young children. In a letter to the FDA, Children’s Health Defense outlines why such a move would be reckless.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) today said it will take legal action against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if the agency grants Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11.

In a letter signed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, and Dr. Meryl Nass, CHD board member, Kennedy and Nass wrote:

“CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke, and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.”

The letter was addressed to Dr. Arnold Monto, chairman of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), committee members and all FDA staff.

VRBPAC members are set to meet Tuesday to consider and likely vote on whether to grant EUA for the Pfizer vaccine for 5- to 11-year olds.

In May, the FDA authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds. Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have not yet been authorized for children under 18.

The letter outlines 12 reasons the FDA should not authorize the pediatric vaccine and provides supporting evidence to back up each argument.

Read the letter:

Dear Chairman Monto, VRBPAC Members and FDA Staff:

We write to you on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a non-profit organization devoted to the health of people and the planet. We have actively followed your work to evaluate, authorize and approve vaccines for the American public and particularly children.

We are aware that you are likely to authorize Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11 at your meeting on Oct. 26. Your authorization thus will expose over 20 million children in the U.S., and millions more around the world, to potential COVID-19 vaccination of an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) product.

We are writing to put you on notice that should you grant EUA status to this pediatric EUA vaccine, CHD is poised to take legal action against you and other Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voting members as well as the FDA.

CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.

We briefly outline why such authorization would be reckless:

1. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID vaccination for young children. Deaths and hospitalizations are rare and have been inflated inaccurately.

2. Nearly half of all children have natural immunity to COVID, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). There is no ethical justification for superfluous vaccination that will put children at elevated risk of vaccine harm.

3. Some children likely will die or be permanently injured from these vaccines based on the authorization for children 12-16.

4. The clinical trials for the pediatric vaccine were too small to detect safety signals for a population in the millions.

5. There are no long-term safety data for COVID vaccination of young children, making this an experiment rather than appropriate medical prevention.

6. Unethical coercive pressure will be applied to children and their parents, as has occurred with older children and adults. To grant authorization is to abet this unethical coercion that violates the Nuremberg Code’s first principle.

7. There is no available care for children injured by COVID shots. The science and medicine have not yet developed, and most families will be unable to cover the costs of potential catastrophic injuries.

8. VRBPAC members should not participate in an exercise disguising a foregone conclusion. The president’s purchase of 65 million pediatric doses, the CDC guidance for COVID vaccine delivery, the American Academy of Pediatrics’s promotion of COVID vaccination for children all call into question whether this committee’s deliberations mean anything.

If the administration is unprepared to wait for your advice, let alone heed it, you should signify your disapproval on behalf of the country the FDA is meant to protect.

9. First, do no harm. You are physicians who owe a duty to patients and medical ethics. If you authorize these shots, given all you know, will you be upholding your oath? If not, is it possible that your acts could later be seen as reason to remove your medical licenses?

10. The liability-free nature of your deliberations may not stand the test of time. In the fullness of time, your decisions may not have the liability protection that they currently enjoy. Under the PREP Act of 2005, all actors advancing an EUA agenda for medical countermeasures enjoy liability protection, absent willful misconduct.

Nonetheless, if at a later point these shots are deemed non-therapeutic gene products that you knowingly and recklessly authorized, and which were then distributed to children as a direct result of your decision, it is possible that liability could later attach.

11. There is no COVID emergency for children of this age.

12. There are safer drugs that could be used prophylactically and therapeutically for COVID in children.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-legal-action-fda-eua-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-children/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2021 17:20

Nostradamus: Prophet of Doom

[image error]

Nostradamus: Prophet of Doom

Directed by Roger Christian (1995)

Film Review

This is a fascinating documentary about French astrologer, physician and clairvoyant Michel de Nostredame, commonly known as Nostradamus.

He was born in Provence in 1503, when the region was not yet part of France. Originally Jewish, his father’s family converted to Catholicism and changed their name to Nostredame to avoid persecution from the Spanish Inquisition. His grandfather trained Michel in astrology, the Kabbalah, Latin, Greek and Hebrew.

According to filmmakers, he entered medical school at the University of Montpelier at age 19 and Latinized his name to Nostradamus following graduation. Other sources reveal he was expelled from university after a year when he was discovered to be a practicing apothecary.*

After leaving medical school, he worked alongside other physicians treating patients afflicted with bubonic plague. He differed from other practitioners in his refusal to bleed patients and his emphasis on hygiene. He had an extremely impressive cure rate (at a time when nearly 100% of plague patients died) using lozenges he concocted from rose petals and rose hips.***

In 1538, after being notified the Inquisition wished to question him, he went on a long tour of Europe, Greece, Turkey and Europe, studying the divination tools ancient civilizations used to foretell the future. When he returned to Provence, he published an extremely popular farmer’s almanac with astrological predictions for the coming year.

In 1555, he became astrologer to to Catherine of Medicis and counselor and physician-in-ordinary to her son King Charles IX of France.

Most of his prophecies derived from self-induced trances based on techniques he had learned through his travels. He recorded his predictions in thousands of “quatrains” he composed using Greek, Latin and anagrams to conceal what he was doing from the Inquisition.****

He published his long term predictions in The Prophecies Nostradamus, in three editions dated 1555, 1563 and 1568. His best known prophecies concern the rise of “Antichrists” (believed to refer to Napoleon and Hitler) who would commit crimes against humanity, his prediction of the French revolution, the US War of Independence, the recent wars against Iraq (Mesopotamia), the invention of the submarine and the Space Shuttle disaster.

He’s also credited with the observation (25 years before Copernicus) that the Sun revolves around the Earth.

*The Kabbalah is an ancient school of Jewish mysticism.

**During the Middle Ages and Renaissance, an apothecary was a medical professional who formulated and dispensed healing herbs and potions to physicians, surgeons, and patients. Considered a “manual trade,” practitioners were prohibited from attending university.

***Modern healers speculated his patients benefited from the high concentrations of Vitamin C found in rose hips.

****At the time, clairvoyance was regarded as heresy punishable by death.

The film can be viewed free on Kanopy.

https://pukeariki.kanopy.com/video/nostradamus-prophet-doom

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2021 12:23

Surprise! Biden Continues the CIA’s JFK Assassination Cover-Up

by Jacob G. Hornberger

The Future of Freedom Foundation

Before I address President Biden’s decision last Friday to continue the national-security establishment’s cover-up of its November 22, 1963, regime-change operation in Dallas, I wish to make one thing perfectly clear: I am not Nostradamus.

Yes, I fully realize that I repeatedly predicted that Biden would never order the release of those 60-year-old assassination-related records that the CIA has steadfastly been keeping secret from the American people. (See here and here.) But that prediction doesn’t make me Nostradamus.

In fact, any reasonable person who has studied the Kennedy assassination could have easily made the same prediction. There has got to be a good reason why the CIA does not want people to see those 60-year-old secret records. That’s why they didn’t disclose them during the era of the Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990s. That’s why they demanded that President Trump continue keeping them secret in 2017. That’s why they demanded that Biden extend the secrecy.

After all, think about it: If Donald Trump, who the national-security establishment loathed, buckled and surrendered to the CIA’s demand for continued secrecy, it’s a no-brainer that Biden, who is owned lock, stocky, and barrel by the national-security establishment, would do the same.

It’s probably worth recalling the candid words of U.S. Senator Charles Schumer: “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” Undoubtedly, Trump, Biden, and the National Archives were all fully aware of the truthfulness of Schumer’s decision in granting the CIA its demand for continued secrecy.

At the risk of belaboring the obvious, those 60-year-old secret records obviously contain incriminating evidence — evidence that consists of more pieces to the puzzle pointing to a regime-change operation in Dallas.

After all, as I have repeatedly pointed out, the notion that the release of 60-year old records could constitute a grave threat to “national security” is nonsensical on its face. Is there anyone who really believes such nonsense?

There can be no doubt that the release of those long-secret records would constitute a grave threat to the CIA, the Pentagon, and the rest of the national-security establishment. But that’s different from constituting a threat to “national security,” whatever meaning one places on that nebulous, meaningless term.

But that’s what Biden stated in his decision last Friday. Biden cited that time-honored term that has become the most important term in the political lexicon of the American people in our time: “national security.”

That’s not all he said. He said that the COVID-19 pandemic had interfered with the National Archives’s ability to coordinate with the CIA, the Pentagon, and other national-security agencies to ascertain whether those records really do constitute a threat to “national security.”

That’s just plain silly. It reminds me of the kid who claimed that his dog ate his homework.

In the 1990s, the CIA and the Pentagon had to set forth the reasons why they wanted another 25 years of secrecy for those records. In 2017, they again had to set forth the specific reasons to Trump as why they were demanding that Trump grant them another five years of secrecy.

Nothing has changed. There are no new reasons for continued secrecy. All that the National Archives needed to do is make a copy of those previously cited reasons and send them to Biden. How in the world could the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded doing that? It couldn’t have. It just another ruse to continue the coverup — and a ridiculous one at that.

Now, let me make something else very clear. I’m not suggesting that those records contain a CIA or Pentagon confession of wrongdoing. From the very start of the CIA, when it began specializing in the dark arts of state-sponsored assassinations and cover-ups, its policy was to never put any of its assassination plots into writing.

What I am saying though is that the records undoubtedly contain incriminating circumstantial evidence that further fills out this particular regime-change mosaic. If I had to predict what that would be, I would say it most likely relates to the operation in Mexico City, where accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to have met with Soviet and Cuban officials.

That part of the regime-change operation clearly went awry, including, for example, producing a photograph of a man who was supposed to be Oswald in Mexico City but who clearly was someone else. Or a tape-recording of a man who was supposed to be Oswald talking to one of those embassies and clearly was the voice of someone else.

In the 1970s, when two young lawyers, Dan Hardway and Ed Lopez, were investigating the Kennedy assassination for the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, they were pressing the CIA for its records relating to Mexico City. In response, the CIA called out of retirement a loyal CIA agent named George Joannides. His job? To block Hardway and Lopez from getting to those records.

[…]

Via https://www.fff.org/2021/10/25/surprise-biden-continues-the-cias-jfk-assassination-cover-up/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2021 12:06

LIVE: Over 10,000 NYC Workers March Against COVID Vaccine Mandates

New York City police, firefighters, first responders, and other essential city workers gathered in Brooklyn Monday to march in defiance of Democrat Mayor Bill de Blasio’s unconstitutional vaccine mandate.

CLOUDHEDGES

Infowars.com

NYPD, FDNY and other city workers risking their careers to fight for medical freedom as vaccine mandate deadline passes.

Tens of thousands of New York City workers are marching in protest of the city’s Covid vaccine mandate.

New York City police, firefighters, first responders, and other essential city workers gathered in Brooklyn Monday to march in defiance of Democrat Mayor Bill de Blasio’s unconstitutional vaccine mandate.

Thousands marched across the Brooklyn Bridge to City Hall holding signs that said “Coercion Is Not Consent,” “No Forced Vax,” and “I Thought We Were Essential.”

Last week, de Blasio issued an order mandating that all New York City employees, including firefighters, police officers, first responders, and sanitation workers get the Covid injection or face termination.

Here’s the scene at FDNY HQ in downtown Brooklyn, as city workers get ready to rally and march across the Brooklyn Bridge to City Hall, in protest…

View original post 177 more words

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2021 11:55

500,000 containers sitting on cargo ships off Southern California coast!

[image error]

Prepare for Change

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA) – As an estimated 500,000 containers are sitting on cargo ships off the Southern California coast, many are wondering how to handle the backlog.

Few are more frustrated about the backlog at the Port of Los Angeles and Long Beach, than truck drivers in the chaos. They say that a trucker shortage is not the problem, instead, the port needs to speed up wait times and have more dock help ready to offload.

“I’ve got friends right now that are in line… from nine o’clock in the morning and they can’t pull the load yet,” said truck driver Walter Martinez. “The people inside, they get paid by the hour, but not the drivers.


Biden administration ignores another crisis as upward of 100 ships now float outside of Los Angeles.
Small business will again face going out of business. pic.twitter.com/sdEuHqyIPS


— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) October 1, 2021


Via https://prepareforchange.net/2021/10/24/500000-containers-are-sitting-on-cargo-ships-off-the-southern-california-coast/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 25, 2021 11:51

October 24, 2021

COMCAST CENSORS VAX INJURED 13-YR.-OLD GIRL WHO VOLUNTEERED FOR PFIZER TRIAL

COMCAST CENSORS VAX INJURED 13-YR.-OLD GIRL WHO VOLUNTEERED FOR PFIZER TRIAL

CD Media Staff

After Initially Accepting 30 Second TV Ad, Comcast Attorneys Kill it at Last Minute

“I’ve waited 7 months for Pfizer or the FDA to acknowledge what happened to my daughter and they haven’t.  They tried to ignore her injuries.  With these ads, she will finally have the chance to be in the room with them, to be seen by them, and for her voice to be heard.”

WASHINGTON, DC, OCTOBER 23. 2021 – A new television ad that spotlights Pfizer vaccine-related injuries suffered by 13-year-old Maddie de Garay was killed Friday late afternoon by Comcast attorneys after initially accepting the ad on Thursday.  The ad was slated to run multiple times before and during the FDA’s VRBPAC Meeting on Pfizer Data on its COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 5-11.

Despite almost no publicity, the public can submit public comments to the FDA for its VRBPAC meeting on Pfizer Data taking place 10/26 for Children ages 5-11. A link to submit a public comment can be found here.

The script of the ad reads:

This is Maddie – she’s 13 and wants to be a pediatric nurse.

When the COVID vaccine became available she volunteered to test it. She said she wanted to help other kids.

 (pause)

This is her now.

(pause)

There are thousands of others like her. They are ignored by the FDA, by the media. She believed it when they said it was safe.

She stepped up to help America. Who’s going to step up for Maddie?

“She wanted to help others, to help the world get back to normal,” said Stephanie.  “She now has lost the ability to walk and relies on an NG tube for all of her nutrition.”

The new physicians treating Maddie asked her about her “anxiety” that was put in her charts in March of 2021, two months after her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.  Maddie looked them straight in the eye and said, “I did not have anxiety before and do not have anxiety now other than from the doctors who have not believed me.”

“She received her vaccine on January 20 and came into our room in the middle of the night, she said she didn’t feel right and couldn’t sleep.  She has been waiting 8 months to be acknowledged by Pfizer, the FDA, and CDC and has not even received acknowledgment from any of them, not an email, a phone call, or a text.  Nothing.  At least with this ad, we know that Maddie will be in the room with the decision-makers and if that can help innocent children in the future not become victims injured by the Pfizer covid vaccine then that is a win in our minds.”

“I’ve waited 7 months for Pfizer or the FDA to acknowledge what happened to my daughter and they haven’t.  They tried to ignore her injuries.  With these ads, she will finally have the chance to be in the room with them, to be seen by them, and for her voice to be heard.”

Despite almost no publicity, the public can submit public comments to the FDA for its VRBPAC meeting on Pfizer Data taking place 10/26 for Children ages 5-11. A link to submit a public comment can be found here.

The video is just one in a series named “The Unacknowledged – the Victims of the Vaccine.” And is a component of a national education effort organized by the not-for-profit organization, the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation.

[…]

Via https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/business/2021/10/23/breaking-comcast-censors-vax-injured-13-yr-old-girl-who-volunteered-for-pfizer-trial/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 24, 2021 16:00

The Most Revolutionary Act

Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
Uncensored updates on world affairs, economics, the environment and medicine.
Follow Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's blog with rss.