Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 651

October 20, 2021

The Syrian Charity Scam

[Source: rescue.org ] By Paul Larudee
Covert Action MagazineAmericans want to feel good about themselves by giving money to charities that claim to be helping the Syrian people. But they are being duped into supporting terrorist forces that have brought misery and violence to the country—while crippling U.S. sanctions accentuate the humanitarian crisis. Are major charitable organizations supporting terrorist organizations through tax-deductible donations while denying aid to those they claim to serve?Doctors Without Borders, the Syrian Emergency Task Force, the International Rescue Committee, the Syrian American Medical Society, the White Helmets, Syrian Forum USA, Islamic Relief USA, CARE, the Syrian American Council, and other major tax-deductible charities all advertise that they are providing humanitarian aid to Syrians. Their ads appear in Facebook, Twitter and other social media on a regular basis. But their aid is not reaching 6.5 million displaced and needy Syrians in Syria.Some of the international charities do excellent work in other countries, but in the small portion of Syria where they provide services and supplies through proxies, their work is under the control of al-Qaeda affiliates and their aid is directed primarily to the fighters and their families.This is the case for both medical services like Doctors Without Borders, and for delivery of food, medical and other relief supplies, hoards of which have been discovered in massive quantities in terrorist headquarters after removal of the terrorists. The civilians in areas formerly held by the fighters report that they often had to pay extortionist sums to get services or supplies.[…]

Via https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/10/20/the-syrian-charity-scam/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 20, 2021 10:41

October 19, 2021

Nancy Pelosi’s Suspicious Ties With Dominion Voting Systems Favored Biden Ballots

The Dominion “glitches,” as defined by Democrats and news media as they were uncovered, were favorable to Biden and first discovered in Georgia. Later, it was revealed the same software was also behind the glitch that reversed 5,500 votes in Antrim County, Michigan. After the Michigan glitch was fixed, it was discovered that President Donald Trump actually won the county by around 2,500 votes.

Clever Journeys

Nancy Pelosi had alarming connections to Dominion Voting Systems, the company with all the voting machines that created more votes for Joe Biden in the 2020 Election.

Their DC lobbyist is Nancy Pelosi’s longtime aide. The company hired Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck earlier in 2020. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.

🔹The Dominion “glitches,” as defined by Democrats and news media as they were uncovered, were favorable to Biden and first discovered in Georgia.

🔹Later, it was revealed the same software was also behind the glitch that reversed 5,500 votes in Antrim County, Michigan.

🔹After the Michigan glitch was fixed, it was discovered that President Donald Trump actually won the county by around 2,500 votes.

Detroit Elections Center hides ballot counting from legal observers.

“Officials with Antrim County posted updated results showing President Trump won the county with 9,783 votes…

View original post 162 more words

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 19, 2021 13:26

Freedom and Ivermectin Prevail

Celebrating Mount Rushmore's Super-Sized and Quirky ...

By Justus R Hope, MDThe Desert Review

The Victory of the Underdog

The nurse plunked down ten crisp hundred-dollar bills, looked the pharmacist in the eye, and said,

“Spray it on the floor. Don’t inject it. I’ll pay you 1,000 dollars if you fill out the card and say I got the vaccine.”

One can draw two inferences from this story:

One, those health care professionals in the know do not want to risk taking the jab. Two, they feel confident they are better protected with something else – and that something is Ivermectin.

By August 13, 2021, the CDC reported Ivermectin prescriptions had reached 88,000 per week, up 24-fold from the baseline of 3,600 per week. Based upon increasing popularity, it appears this number has risen many times again over the past two months, easily reaching into the millions.

https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/han00449.asp

Up-to-date October data are not public for obvious reasons.

But what has been released are the daily COVID cases and deaths, and these tell a striking tale. The current graph of the United States COVID cases has taken on the “Ivermectin Fingerprint” pattern so familiar to us from India, Peru, and Indonesia after they adopted Ivermectin.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout

It is familiar to anyone who read the book Ivermectin for the World or Dr. Pierre Kory’s peer-reviewed article, “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19.”

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

It is also familiar to anyone who has reviewed Juan Chamie’s graphs.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/epidemiologic-analyses-on-covid19-and-ivermectin/

A study by Hellwig and Maia published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents in January 2021 described the much lower rate of COVID-19 infection in those countries that routinely used prophylactic chemotherapy (PCT), including Ivermectin.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698683/

These researchers noticed a strong negative correlation between Ivermectin use and  COVID-19 cases – ranging from a reduction of between 30 to 90%.

Now, some nine months later, we see the near-complete eradication of COVID-19 from Uttar Pradesh, India, after a systematic test and treat program coordinated by the WHO that involved the distribution of millions of Ivermectin-containing home treatment kits.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed

Today, we notice the United Kingdom, with nearly 70% of its citizens fully vaccinated, has encountered an unrelenting rise in Delta cases. Their Delta Surge began a month before the United States, and it is lingering longer. If the vaccines worked, the United Kingdom should be performing better than the US. But the reverse has occurred.

The United States, with its vaccinations stagnated at 57.3%, is enjoying a massive drop in cases.

At nearly the same vaccination rate as the US, 55%, Australia is seeing a deadly and unforgiving Delta surge amidst harsh lockdown measures that are universally failing. As a result, their cases are going through the roof despite mandatory mass vaccinations. At the same time, the United States’ cases are dropping like a stone.

The reason? Ivermectin.

In Australia, Ivermectin has been banned, even for off-label use, since September 10, 2021.

https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-restrictions-prescribing-ivermectin-covid-19

They have paid a terrible price in cases and deaths – despite having almost the same vaccination rate as the United States.

On September 10, Australia averaged just 1673 new COVID cases per day. However, after the Ivermectin ban, cases surged, and by October 10, they had risen to 2295 per day, a jump of 37%. These figures were compiled by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE).

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

The United Kingdom, with 66.7% of the population fully vaccinated, went from an average of 37,691 new daily cases to 40,050 in the same time frame. However, the United States enjoyed a drop from an average of 145,666 daily new cases on September 10 to just 96,565 on October 10, a decline of more than one-third.

Why?

There are many reasons, but the greatest has to do with freedom – creating off-label access to Ivermectin. In the United States, we continue to enjoy a patient’s right to choose their doctor and their medical treatment – at least when we are out of the hospital.

[…]

Via https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/freedom-and-ivermectin-prevail/article_05d8061e-3035-11ec-bfe8-2b94d8993caf.html/

 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 19, 2021 12:55

Hidden History: The Great African American Migration North

Goin’ to Chicago

Directed by George King (1994)

Film Review

This documentary is about the great African American migration to Northern cities that occurred between 1915 and the late sixties. Roughly 1.5 million African Americans left the South after 1915. This related partly to the mechanization of the cotton harvest (and major job losses) and partly to extreme terrorist violence Blacks faced from white supremacy groups like the Ku Klux Klan.

Blacks from Texas and Louisiana tended to migrate to California; those from Georgia, Alabama and the Carolinas to Eastern cities; and those from Mississippi to Chicago.

Most settled in Chicago, filling thousands of job openings in the stockyards, steel mills and factories and with the railroads.

Owing to a shortage of housing, many landlords divided up their apartments and charged higher rents than for spacious apartments on Chicago’s exclusive North Shore. Redlining* and restrictive covenants** made it extremely difficult for African Americans to purchase homes. The first Blacks to move into white neighborhoods were subject to rock throwing and other forms of intimidation.

Mayor Richard Daly built the Cabrini Green high rise in 1962 to accommodate new migrants. Owing to tenancy conditions forcing people to move out when their incomes improved, by the late sixties Cabrini Green and similar subsidized high rises had become the new ghetto. To make matters worse, between 1975 and 1990 more than half Chicago’s manufacturing jobs moved to the non-union South or overseas.

*Refusal of banks to grant mortgages to African Americans

**Conditions in property titles that prevented homeowners from selling their homes on to African Americans.

The full film can be viewed free on Kanopy.

https://pukeariki.kanopy.com/video/goin-chicago

 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 19, 2021 11:57

October 18, 2021

California School Walkout as Thousands of Parents Defy Child Vaccine Mandate

Chairs, desk and other school furniture is stacked outside a classroom at a public elementary school in Glendale, California just north of Los Angeles, August 17, 2020 amid the coronavirus pandemic. Thousands of children will not be in school on Monday as parents protest California Governor Gavin Newsom’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement for students. © Robyn Beck/AFP

By Jack DuttonNewsweek Thousands of children will not be in school on Monday as parents protest California Governor Gavin Newsom‘s COVID-19 vaccine requirement for students, by taking their kids to the state capitol to protest. In October, Newsom’s Office announced that California would be the first state in the U.S. to require school students to be vaccinated following the full FDA approval of the COVID-19 vaccine for grades 7 to 12 and K-6. California also was the first state to implement school mask and staff vaccination mandates.

The “Our Children, Our Choice!” protest will take place at the California State Capitol in Sacramento, at 10 a.m. local time. On the Facebook event, there are more than 1,100 people indicating they are “going” and more than 3,300 who say they are “interested”.

Tess Van Dusen, event organizer, said in a statement: “We’re fighting for the freedom to make the medical choices that are best for our children. We are fully prepared to pull our kids from public school and hire our own teaching staff if that’s what it takes. We do not co-parent with the government.”

“The point of this protest is for the right of choice. We have a right to do what is best for our family—that’s the bottom line,” said Amber Faddis, another protest organizer.

[…]

Via https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/california-school-walkout-as-thousands-of-parents-defy-child-vaccine-mandate/ar-AAPEpXF

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 18, 2021 17:03

The Unvaccinated Are Looking Smarter Every Week

Thomas T. Siler, M.D., American Thinker
Waking Times 

There is a massive propaganda push against those choosing not to vaccinate against COVID-19 with the experimental mRNA vaccines. Mainstream media, the big tech corporations, and our government have combined efforts to reward compliance and to shame and marginalize non-compliance. Their mantra says that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Persons who choose not to vaccinate are characterized as unintelligent, selfish, paranoid people who don’t read much and live in a trailer park in Florida (or Alabama, or Texas, or name your state). Never has there been such an effort to cajole, manipulate through fear, and penalize people to take an experimental medical treatment.

However, as time has passed with this pandemic and more data accumulates about the virus and the vaccine, the unvaccinated are looking smarter and smarter with each passing week. It has been shown now that the vaccinated equally catch and spread the virus. Vaccine side effect data continues to accumulate that make the risk of taking the vaccine prohibitive as the pandemic wanes. Oral and IV medications (flccc.net) that work early in the treatment of COVID-19 are much more attractive to take now as the vaccine risks are becoming known, especially because the vaccinated will need endless boosters every six months.

First, let’s address the intelligence of the unvaccinated. Vaccine hesitancy is multi-factorial and has little to do with level of education or intelligence. Carnegie Mellon University did a study assessing vaccine hesitancy across educational levels. According to the study, what’s the educational level with the most vaccine hesitancy? Ph.D. level! Those can’t all have been awarded to liberal arts majors. Clearly, scientists who can read the data and assess risk are among the least likely to take the mRNA vaccines.

The claim that there’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated is, therefore, patently untrue. As a retired nurse from California recently asked, “Why do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that did not protect the protected in the first place?” If the vaccine works to prevent infection, then the vaccinated have nothing to worry about. If the vaccine does not prevent infection, then the vaccinated remain at some risk, and the unvaccinated would be less likely to choose a vaccine that does not work well.

The mRNA vaccine efficacy is very narrow and focused on the original alpha strain of COVID-19. By targeting one antigen group on the spike protein, it does help for the original alpha strain, but it is clear now it does not protect against Delta strain and is likely not protective against any future strains that might circulate. It also appears that the efficacy wanes in 4-6 months, leading to discussions about boosters.

[…]

Via https://www.wakingtimes.com/the-unvaccinated-are-looking-smarter-every-week/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 18, 2021 11:51

Groundbreaking: Nebraska AG Says Doctors Can Legally Prescribe Ivermectin, HCQ for COVID

Groundbreaking: Nebraska AG Says Doctors Can Legally Prescribe Ivermectin, HCQ for COVID, Calls Out FDA, CDC, Fauci, Media for ‘Fueling Confusion and Misinformation’

Few subjects have been more controversial than ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine

By  Megan Redshaw

At the request of the Nebraska Department of Health, on Oct. 15, Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson issued a legal opinion that Nebraska healthcare providers can legally prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID, so long as they obtain informed consent from the patient.

Few subjects have been more controversial than ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine — two long-established, inexpensive medications widely and successfully used in many parts of the world for the prevention and treatment of COVID.

By contrast, the use of both medications against COVID has been largely suppressed in the U.S, where doctors have been threatened and punished for prescribing them.

On Oct. 15, Nebraska Attorney General (AG) Doug Peterson issued a legal opinion that Nebraska healthcare providers can legally prescribe off-label medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID, so long as they obtain informed consent from the patient.

However, if they did neglect to obtain consent, deceive, prescribe excessively high doses or other misconduct, they could be subject to discipline, Peterson wrote.

The AG’s office emphasized it was not recommending any specific treatment for COVID. “That is not our role,” Peterson wrote. “Rather, we address only the off-label early treatment options discussed in this opinion and conclude that the available evidence suggests they might work for some people.”

Peterson said allowing physicians to consider early treatments will free them to evaluate additional tools that could save lives, keep patients out of the hospital and provide relief for our already strained healthcare system.

The opinion, based on an assessment of relevant scientific literature, was rendered in response to a request by Dannette Smith, CEO of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.

Smith asked the AG’s office to look into whether doctors could face discipline or legal action under Nebraska’s Uniform Credential Act (UCA) — meant to protect public health, safety and welfare — if they prescribed ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

“After receiving your question and conducting our investigation, we have found significant controversy and suspect information about potential COVID-19 treatments,” Peterson wrote.

For example, a paper published in the Lancet — one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world — denounced hydroxychloroquine as dangerous, yet the statistics were flawed and the authors refused to provide analyzed data.

The paper was retracted, but not before countries stopped using the drug and trials were cancelled or interrupted.

“The Lancet’s own editor-in-chief admitted that the paper was a ‘fabrication,’ a ‘monumental fraud’ and a ‘shocking example of research misconduct’ in the middle of a global health emergency,” Peterson wrote in the opinion.

A recently published paper on COVID recognized that “for reasons that are yet to be clarified,” early treatment has not been emphasized despite numerous U.S. healthcare providers advocating for early treatment and “scores of treating and academic physicians” — who have published papers in well respected journals — urging early interventions.

Peterson cited numerous studies showing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine reduced mortality by up to 75% or more when used as a preventative or prophylaxis for COVID, suggesting hundreds of thousands of lives could have been saved had the drugs been widely used in America.

“Every citizen — Democrat or Republican — should be grateful for Doug Peterson’s thoughtful and courageous counteroffensive against the efforts of Big Pharma, its captive federal regulators, and its media and social media allies to silence doctors and deny Americans life-saving treatments,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman of Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender via email.

“We finally have a leader who puts constitutional rights, peer-reviewed science and human health above industry profits. Doug Peterson is uncowed and unbowed — a genuine hero on horseback for all Americans.” Kennedy said.

Children’s Health Defense President Mary Holland agreed. “This Nebraska AG opinion lets doctors get back to being doctors — without being second-guessed by government, pharmacists and others interfering in the crucial doctor-patient relationship,” Holland said.

Although the AG’s office did not rule out the possibility that other off-label drugs might show promise — either now or in the future — as a prophylaxis or treatment against COVID, it confined its opinion to ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the sake of brevity.

Nebraska AG highlights science on ivermectin

In his legal opinion, Peterson concluded evidence showed ivermectin demonstrated striking effectiveness in preventing and treating COVID, and any side effects were primarily minor and transient. “Thus, the UCA does not preclude physicians from considering ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID,” Peterson wrote.

In the decade leading up to the COVID pandemic, Peterson found numerous studies showing ivermectin’s antiviral acti­vity against several RNA viruses by blocking the nuclear trafficking of viral proteins, adding to 50 years of research confirming ivermectin’s antiviral effects.

In addition, safety data for ivermectin showed side effects were “vanishingly small.” The latest statistics available through VigiAccess reported only 5,674 adverse drug reac­tions to ivermectin between 1992 and October 13, 2021, an “incredibly low” number given that 3.7 billion doses have been administered since the 1980s, Peterson wrote.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nebraska-ag-doug-peterson-legal-opinion-ivermectin-hcq-covid/

 

 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 18, 2021 11:23

US Sanctions On Iran Aggravate the Global Energy Crisis

Crude oil pouring out of a barrel

Crude oil pouring out of a barrel | Photo: Twitter/ @SpiroSpianadaTelesur

Iran can increase its oil exports by 1.5 million barrels per day in less than six months if the sanctions are lifted, which would contribute to the reduction of international prices.

As the world is facing a grave energy crisis caused by growing demand for fossil fuels, the U.S. sanctions on Iran have hindered an alleviation of the crisis.

With major economies slowly recovering from the pandemic, the previous harsh winter having depleted Europe’s gas reserves and cold days ahead, global demand for energy has shot up and commodity prices are consequently going up. In Europe, gas prices are at record levels. Britain is one of the hardest-hit countries due to the dwindling North Sea supplies and its limited gas storage. Spain and France are seeing surges in electricity prices and other commodity prices. Meanwhile, gas prices are soaring in the United States amid a sudden increase in the price of oil.

A real solution to the energy crisis is still not in sight. Although Russia has promised to increase exports, the remaining major fossil fuel suppliers currently seem either unable or unwilling to make a significant contribution to the alleviation of the crisis. The global energy market needs new blood, analysts have said.

Iran has abundant hydrocarbon resources. It held 32 trillion cubic meters of proven gas reserves as of 2019, ranking second in the world and accounting for about 16 percent of the global natural gas reserves. This nation held 156 billion barrels of proven oil reserves as of 2019, ranking fourth in the world and accounting for about 9 percent of the entire global oil reserves. Iran, located along the International North-South Transport Corridor and having access to the high seas, Europe through Turkey and Central Asia, can also be a source of rather cheap energy owing to its geographical position, said observers.


#Spain is canary in the mine for Europe’s emerging energy crisis. Spain relies more on imports for its energy needs than most EU nations, the country’s experience shows what lies in store for region as it heads into colder, gas-burning months of winter.https://t.co/H69aVtFacz pic.twitter.com/d05rD2ehMt


— Holger Zschaepitz (@Schuldensuehner) October 16, 2021


Prior to Washington’s withdrawal in 2018 from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and the reimposition of the unilateral sanctions mainly targeting the oil and gas sector, Iran used to pump about 2.8 million barrels per day of crude oil into the global market. Iran is also exporting gas to some neighboring countries, including Turkey and Iraq, and can be a reliable supplier to Europe as well as the rest of the world in the long run. Iranian energy expert Morteza Behrouzi said that Iran can increase its oil exports by 1.5 million barrels per day in less than six months if the sanctions are lifted, which can create a win-win situation.

The U.S. sanctions on Iran have, however, deprived the world of the boon as they have denied this Islamic nation access to billions of dollars in annual revenues, thus creating a zero-sum game. Earlier, Iranian Oil Minister Javad Owji said that the U.S. and some European countries have hindered Iran from exporting oil for many years, and Iran is not the only one paying the price. This unilateral policy also has a negative impact on the American and European people.

[…]

Via https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/US-Sanctions-On-Iran-Aggravate-the-Global-Energy-Crisis-20211018-0005.html

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 18, 2021 11:10

October 17, 2021

Amazon Caught Throwing Away Tons of Unexpired Food as US Faces Unprecedented Food Insecurity

amazon


Matt Agorist 


FreeThoughtProject


Food insecurity in the Land of the Free is at a historical high. Thanks to the fed printing trillions to pay for their irresponsible and economically devastating lockdown policies, food costs have gone through the roof, supply chains are disrupted, there are fewer workers, and the impact is empty shelves. According to a report in Bloomberg, some of the countries largest food distributors are reporting difficulties in fulfilling orders.

Naturally, if the retail food supply is in a rut, the food banks and charities reflect this. The U.S. Census Bureau reported in March that as many as 9 million children live in a household where they don’t eat enough because the parents can’t afford it. And now, those who are able to donate, can’t due to shortages in the supply chain.


One company, however, isn’t reporting any shortages and, according to a shocking account, has an excess so large, they are throwing thousands of pounds of food away every single day.


An anonymous whistleblower from inside Amazon has exposed a practice by the delivery giant that removes any claims of Amazon running an efficient and sustainable ship. This person claims to be an employee inside an Amazon warehouse and has provided photographs of thousands of food items being destroyed on a daily basis — with the expiration dates days or weeks away.


The images were uploaded to a Reddit board by a person who claims to work inside an Amazon warehouse. The OP originally claimed that this was happening in all Amazon warehouses, claiming he had talked to other employees, but changed the post so he wouldn’t be sued by Amazon if, in fact, it wasn’t all warehouses.


According to the OP, “these food items are being scanned out as “exp-removal-donate” and being trashed at my facility. These items are on the same list as our daily donations lists we have. Canned, boxed, toiletry and other are donated accordingly but refrigerated and frozen are not at my facility at least.”


Unfortunately, these items are not making it to the donations area and instead are being destroyed on site. When asked why the food is being destroyed, the OP responded:



This food is days or weeks away from the labeled best-by or sell by date on the packaging. New product is constantly coming in and room has to be made daily for such.


These items are being scanned out with our daily donations lists we have. Canned, boxed, toiletry and other are donated accordingly but refrigerated and frozen are not at my facility at least.


I have seen multiple pallets come in to the warehouse to be immediately thrown away as we did not have the storage capacity to store said product.



Amazon could easily contact the multiple food banks in the area who are ready and willing to come by and pick it up for free, up to and including the frozen and chilled items.


“There are plenty of food banks and resources out there that are willing to pick up items in a refrigerated/frozen truck to disperse to ensure the items do not perish or go bad in transit,” the OP said.


[…]


Via https://thefreethoughtproject.com/amazon-caught-throwing-away-tons-of-unexpired-food-as-us-faces-unprecedented-food-insecurity/






 
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 17, 2021 12:46

Men ‘cleared’ for release from GITMO a cruel, twisted joke

Gitmo explained

Written by  Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
Responsible Statecraft

It likely means years of languishing until some other client state takes them on board under Washington’s strict conditions.

The announcement that the Biden Administration has cleared two more Guantanamo Bay detainees for transfer is a hopeful sign in as much that two men have surpassed one hurdle on the way to freedom. But don’t be fooled, they may not see the light of day outside the barbed wire and concrete of the Cuban island for years. And if they do, it will most likely be in a foreign country not of their own choosing, with government monitors awaiting them. And if they are sent to the United Arab Emirates, it could be the next stop to an even greater hell.

Simple question: What kind of constitutional republic are we that supports federal measures that detain other human beings without charge for 20 years and then, when they are “cleared” to go, insist they must be released to a foreign government that agrees to treat them as criminals furthermore?

According to the New York Times, Sanad Yislam al-Kazimi and Assadullah Haroon Gul, of Yemen and Afghanistan respectively, cannot go back to their native countries because of obvious security concerns. Al-Kazimi is likely to go to neighboring Oman, which has taken some 30 repatriations over the years, and Gul’s fate is up in the air.

The Biden Administration has released but one Guantanamo Bay prisoner since he took office. But even then, the process for Abdul Latif Nasser’s release began during the Obama administration. Nasser, 56, who was never charged with a crime, actually got to return to his home country of Morocco, though he was subsequently put under investigation there, too.

So who is left? According to the Times, there are 39 detainees at the prison (which Obama had pledged to close during his time) today. Al-Kazimi and Assadullah now join 10 others of that number who are cleared to go but awaiting repatriation. Another 15 are not charged but are considered “law of war” prisoners and not cleared (news flash: supposedly we are not “at war” anymore — or are we? Apparently it is fungible). That includes Abu Zubaydah, who was waterboarded 83 times upon his capture nearly 20 years ago and still hasn’t been charged (and is still awaiting a ruling as to whether his detention is lawful). There are 10 who are awaiting trial (including the so-called 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four cohorts), and two already convicted. No one has any confidence that those trials will go anywhere soon, given the issues over torture evidence and the convoluted nature of the system. Meanwhile, as of 2019, each prisoner at GTMO has cost the U.S. taxpayers $13 million a year.

[…]

Via https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/10/15/men-cleared-for-release-from-gitmo-is-a-cruel-twisted-joke/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 17, 2021 12:31

The Most Revolutionary Act

Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
Uncensored updates on world affairs, economics, the environment and medicine.
Follow Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's blog with rss.