Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 644
November 3, 2021
Game-changer New Study: COVID Jabs Are Likely Life Shortening!
Principia Scientific
A game-changer study just published in the respected journal, Nature, revealed that the experimental COVID ‘vaccines’ have only temporary benefits, but worse yet, are long term threats to your life! It warns, anyone vaxxed who already has poor health is especially prone to dangers from cardiovascular mortality. [1]
The stark warning from this Nature study is that it:
“recommends additional caution when vaccinating people with pre-existing clinical conditions, including diabetes, electrolyte imbalances, renal dysfunction, and coagulation disorders.”
But don’t be complacent if you’re in rude health when you get the jab because these new results appear to suggest that even healthy people who take the vaccine may be unnecessarily exposing themselves to higher risk of developing diabetes.
A total of 11 healthy adult volunteers of both sexes, aged 24–47 years, with a BMI of 21.5–30.0 kg/m², were enrolled for the study. Adverse events were monitored daily during the first 7 days after each inoculation and then self-recorded by the participants on diary cards in the following weeks. Overall, adverse reactions were mild (grades 1 or 2) and transient (Supplementary Table S3).
The authors noted that the science and “The manner in which vaccination would mimic an infection has not been fully evaluated.”
The study confirmed that these ‘vaccines’ do not have long lasting benefit.
Antibodies production was not sustained over the long period and by the end of three months the vaccine had lost half of effectiveness, such that, “By day 90, IgG positivity also reduced to 50%, indicating antibody production did not sustain for a long time.”
The authors found:
“Testing results from cohort A demonstrated that prior to the 2nd inoculation 0 percent of the participants developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, but by day 28, which was 2 weeks post the 2nd inoculation, 100 percent of the participants were tested positive (Fig. 1b)”
The study adds:
“ PBMCs scRNA-seq results also indicated consistent reductions in CD8+ T cells and increases in monocyte contents, as well as enhanced NF-κB inflammatory signaling, which also mimicked responses after infection. Surprisingly, type I interferon responses, which had been linked to reduced damages after SARS-CoV-2 infection and milder symptoms, appeared to be reduced after vaccination, at least by 28 days post the 1st inoculation. This might suggest that in the short-term (1 month) after vaccination, a person’s immune system is in a non-privileged state, and may require more protection.”
Type 2 Diabetic Concerns
Perhaps the most worrying finding, especially for westerners eating an unhealthy high sugar diet, is the inordinate rise in blood sugar levels directly correlated to being injected with these experimental ‘vaccines.’
The study found:
“To our surprise, quite consistent increases in HbA1c levels were observed in healthy volunteers, regardless of whether they belonged to cohort A or B. By day 28 post the 1st inoculation, three out of 11 individuals reached the prediabetic range (Fig. 2c). By days 42 and 90, medium HbA1c levels appeared to revert back, yet were still significantly higher than those before vaccination. Previous work has demonstrated that diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood glucose levels are more prone to develop severe forms of COVID-1919. High blood glucose levels/glycolysis had been shown to promote SARS-CoV-2 replication in human monocytes via the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and activation of HIF1A20, therefore presenting a disadvantageous feature.”
What is HbA1c?
HbA1c is what’s known as glycated haemoglobin. This is something that’s made when the glucose (sugar) in your body sticks to your red blood cells. Your body can’t use the sugar properly, so more of it sticks to your blood cells and builds up in your blood.
Risks from higher HbA1c
It is known among medical scientists that:
“High HbA1c levels can have many negative effects on your health, whether you have diabetes or not. People with high levels are at an increased risk of dementia, heart disease, kidney disease, mental health problems, fatigue, and bone loss. Scientists think HbA1c levels might also impact a person’s lifespan. Both above and below normal levels have been linked with increased mortality.”[2]
[…]
Via https://principia-scientific.com/game-changer-new-study-covid-jabs-are-likely-life-shortening/
Based On Pfizer’s Own Data, Kids 5-11 Don’t Need Their “Vaccine”
Source: Granite Grok
NWO Report
What I am about to share should be essential reading for all parents and policymakers. I’ll only share a bit because I want you to read the source material. But I think you’re going to want to do that.
And not just because the author deserves the credit or the traffic. What he is saying made perfect sense to everyone at the CDC and the FDA before COVID19.
Let’s examine Pfizer’s EUA application and the FDA’s risk-benefit analysis. By Pfizer’s own admission, there were zero hospitalization, ICU admissions, or deaths, in the treatment or control group in their study of 2,300 children ages 5 to 11.
So the Number Needed to Vaccinate in order to prevent a single hospitalization, ICU admission, or death, according to Pfizer’s own data, is infinity. ∞. Not the good kind of infinity as in God or love or time or the universe. This is the bad kind of infinity as in you could vaccinate every child age 5 to 11 in the U.S. and not prevent a single hospitalization, ICU admission, or death from coronavirus according to Pfizer’s own clinical trial data as submitted to the FDA.
Via https://nworeport.me/2021/11/03/based-on-pfizers-own-data-kids-5-11-dont-need-their-vaccine/
Tens of billions of dollars worth of cargo lay anchored outside American ports as Biden-induced supply chain collapse worsens
NaturalNews.com / JD Heyes
(Natural News) The supply chain crisis brought on, in part, by Joe Biden’s abhorrent economic policies and his administration’s incompetence is getting worse, as a shipping industry website noted this week that tens of billions of dollars worth of cargo lay at anchor aboard dozens of ships waiting to be offloaded.
“There was fleeting hope that Southern California port congestion had turned the corner. The number of container ships waiting offshore dipped to the low 60s and high 50s from a record high of 73 on Sept. 19, trans-Pacific spot rates plateaued, the Biden administration unveiled aspirations for 24/7 port ops, and electricity shortages curbed Chinese factory output,” the Freighways website reported.
But in fact, the site notes further, the port congestion crisis that has been plaguing Southern California isn’t really improving at all.
The site notes that wait times for ships offshore are growing because there are too many vessels arriving daily and there are not enough resources to get cargo distributed in a timely manner. In fact, Freightways says that already, ports have far too much cargo for their terminals, trains, trucks and warehouses, as capacity has been stretched to the limit.
“The number of ships at anchor or in holding patterns is once again at record levels. According to the Marine Exchange of Southern California, 79 container ships were waiting off Los Angeles and Long Beach on Thursday, yet another all-time record,” the website reported, adding:
Marine Exchange data shows that ships waiting offshore on Thursday — including the 79 container ships as well as six additional cargo vessels carrying containers — had aggregate capacity of 597,250 twenty-foot equivalent units. To put that in perspective, that is 28% more than the Port of Los Angeles imported during the entire month of September and 70% of the combined Los Angles/Long Beach port complex’s September imports.
Assuming ships are at capacity, how much cargo value is out there in the “floating warehouse”? What’s in each box, and its value, varies dramatically — it can be worth a few thousand dollars or several hundred thousand dollars. But Port of Los Angeles stats provide a good guide.
In 2020, the website notes, the total customs values of all containerized imports at the Port of Los Angeles was a whopping $211.9 billion. If imports “totaled 4,827,040 TEUs, this equates to an average of $43,899 per import TEU. (Several other sources also estimated average cargo value at around $40,000 per TEU.),” the site added.
So, using these figures, the dollar amount of cargo currently at anchor off the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach is worth a cumulative $26.2 billion, or more than the annual GDP of Iceland and all of McDonalds’ revenues.
The Signal platform shows that wait times from dropping anchor to berthing at the L.A. port rose to an all-time high of 13 days last week, which is up an astounding 65 percent since the beginning of September.
“But the average wait time doesn’t tell the full story. Ships have been sitting in San Pedro Bay for more than twice that long,” Freightways says.
And it’s going to get worse.
“The Port of Los Angeles continues to struggle with the volume of cargo vessels arriving daily. More than 100 container ships are anchored around the port, many continuing to wait weeks for unloading with international crews restricted to their vessels,” the Forward Observer private intelligence service reported Friday.
“Over the summer, 30-40 vessels anchored at a time was considered overwhelming and having direct impacts on consumer product availability. Despite expanding port hours, midstream logistics and lack of warehousing prevent meaningful progress in reducing supply chain bottlenecks,” the firm’s analysts said in a subscriber newsletter.
[…]
Over 23,000 Registered Voters Revealed To Have Same Phone Number and Over 4,000 With Same Date of Registration Found in Wisconsin County
100PercentFedUp. com
Wisconsin’s Racine County’s GOP has discovered significant evidence of Election Fraud while investigating their voter registration database.
The County’s Republican Party Committee on Election Fraud has identified great areas of consternation while sifting through the database. Most notably, there are over 23,000 voters who are registered under the exact same phone number, one that the city claimed was used as a “default” number up until 2005. However, according to the official report, the Committee found “over 100 active voters that registered after 2005 including 38 active voters that were registered in 2020 with this same number”.
One of the key questions brought up in the report is: “If this is an auto fill “default” program, why are there 131,687 people without phone numbers registered in Racine County”.
In addition to the suspicious phone number data, the Committee also uncovered 4,120 individuals who registered on 1/1/1918. 40 people did not have a date of registration listed. To this point, the Republican Committee asked the County why they would not require these voters to re-register in order to confirm the accuracy of their voter database.
This report follows another recent investigation into the same County after they were accused of exploiting their senior citizens to commit election fraud at a nursing home. The staff allegedly filled out the ballots of cognitively impaired residents, breaking state election law.
[…]
November 2, 2021
From Boeing to Mercedes, U.S. worker rebellion swells over vaccine mandates
By Tina Bellon and Eric M. JohnsonReutersAUSTIN/SEATTLE, Nov 2 (Reuters) – In Wichita, Kansas, nearly half of the roughly 10,000 employees at aircraft companies Textron Inc (TXT.N) and Spirit AeroSystems (SPR.N) remain unvaccinated against COVID-19, risking their jobs in defiance of a federal mandate, according to a union official.
“We’re going to lose a lot of employees over this,” said Cornell Beard, head of the local Machinists union district. Many workers did not object to the vaccines as such, he said, but were staunchly opposed to what they see as government meddling in personal health decisions.
The union district has hired a Texas-based lawyer to assist employees and prepare potential lawsuits against the companies should requests for medical or religious exemptions to vaccination be denied.
A life-long Democrat, Beard said he would no longer vote for the party. “They’ll never get another vote from me and I’m telling the workers here the same thing.”
The clock is ticking for companies that want to continue gaining federal contracts under an executive order by Democratic President Joe Biden, which requires all contractor employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by Dec. 8.
That means federal contract workers need to have received their last COVID-19 shot at least two weeks before the deadline to gain maximum protection, according to U.S. government guidance.
With a three-week gap between shots of the Pfizer (PFE.N)/BioNTech vaccine, workers must get the first jab by Wednesday. If the government holds fast to its deadline, it is already too late to choose Moderna’s (MRNA.O) vaccine, which is given in two doses four weeks apart. Workers could opt to get Johnson & Johnson’s (JNJ.N) single-shot vaccine until Nov. 24 to meet the deadline.
Vaccines remain by far the most effective way to prevent COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths, particularly faced with the extremely contagious Delta variant of the virus that can cause infections even among those fully vaccinated.
Despite vocal opposition from some, vaccine mandates have been effective at shrinking the rates of the unvaccinated and convincing the reluctant to roll up their sleeves.
Several big employers such as Procter & Gamble (PG.N), 3M (MMM.N) and airlines including American Airlines (AAL.O) and JetBlue (JBLU.O) have imposed mandates. In some industries, including among food workers, unions have supported vaccine requirements.
But the mandate has stirred protests from workers in industries across the country, as well as from Republican state officials.
Opposition to the mandate could potentially lead to thousands of U.S. workers losing their jobs and imperil an already sluggish economic recovery, union leaders, workers and company executives said.
More legal clashes are likely over how companies decide requests for vaccination exemptions.
For the companies, time is getting tight, though the Biden administration has signaled federal contractors will not have to immediately lay off unvaccinated workers who miss the Dec. 8 deadline.
Under government guidance published on Monday, companies will have flexibility over how to implement the mandate, which may allow them to avoid mass firings.
“A covered contractor should determine the appropriate means of enforcement with respect to its employee,” the guidance said.
For Boeing Co (BA.N) in the United States, more than 7,000 workers have applied for religious exemptions and around 1,000 are seeking medical exemptions, people familiar with the matter told Reuters. That amounts to some 6% of the planemaker’s roughly 125,000 U.S employees.
‘ILLEGAL, IMMORAL AND IMPRACTICAL’
At a rally last week outside Boeing property in Auburn, south of Seattle, many of the three dozen workers gathered in driving rain said they would rather be escorted off Boeing property on Dec. 8 than take a vaccine. Others said they would pursue early retirement.
“The mandate is illegal, immoral and impractical,” said one veteran Boeing program analyst who attended the rally. “We are standing together against a company and government trampling on our rights.”
Many legal experts have said vaccine mandates in the interest of public health are legal. The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected several challenges to mandates, with the high court last week turning away a healthcare worker who sought a religious exemption to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The rebellion has put Boeing executives in a bind. The company could lose skilled staff, but must comply with a presidential order.
A Boeing spokesperson said the company was committed to maintaining a safe working environment for its employees.
The order’s provision for religious and medical exemptions is causing more tension.
Two Textron workers who requested religious exemptions told Reuters the company’s human resources representatives quizzed them on the name of their church leaders and asked detailed questions about their faith.
Textron declined to respond to questions, but in a statement said it was obligated to comply with Biden’s order and was taking steps to do so.
“Employees who are unable to receive the COVID-19 vaccination due to a medical condition or sincerely held religious belief are being provided an opportunity to request an accommodation from this requirement,” Textron said.
Spirit AeroSystems did not respond to a request for comment.
Raytheon Technologies’ (RTX.N) CEO Greg Hayes last week warned the U.S. defense firm will lose “several thousand” employees because of the mandate.
A group representing FedEx Corp (FDX.N), United Parcel Service Inc (UPS.N) and other cargo carriers said it would be virtually impossible to have all their workforces vaccinated by the deadline.
Some companies have imposed vaccine mandates even absent immediate government regulation.
Mercedes-Benz USA, the U.S. unit of German carmaker Daimler AG (DAIGn.DE) which is not a U.S. government contractor, told employees in an October email seen by Reuters that proof of vaccination against COVID-19 would become a condition of employment beginning Jan. 4.
The carmaker said it implemented the move in anticipation of a separate U.S. government vaccine mandate that would apply to businesses with at least 100 employees, affecting some 80 million workers nationwide.
Less than half of the company’s workers at U.S. import processing centers are vaccinated and many refuse to get a shot, according to a source familiar with the matter.
[…]
.
Lt. Col. Theresa Long Silenced by U.S. Army After Grounding Pilots Experiencing Adverse Reactions to Covid ‘Vaccines’
Source: JD Rucker
NWO Report
Not only is the U.S. military forcing service members to get jabbed, they’re also silencing doctors who note adverse reactions.
Physician and Army Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long spoke today during a roundtable discussion organized by Senator Ron Johnson. She reported some very disturbing details of her experiences with patients who had recently been “vaccinated” for Covid-19.
“With respect to aviation safety, risk communication is critical,” she said. “I saw five patients in clinic, two of which presented with chest pain days to weeks after vaccination and were subsequently diagnosed with pericarditis and worked up to rule out myocarditis.”
The military’s push for universal vaccinations, which comes down from the Biden-Harris regime via the Pentagon, has been a contentious issue because the facts do not support the decision. The recovery rate for young and healthy people, which account for the vast majority of members of the military, is so astronomical it boggles the mind to think that this disease is being focused on so tenaciously.
For the elderly and immunocompromised, Covid-19 offers a greater risk, but our military is not comprised of very many who can be classified as vulnerable. Combine this with the fact that natural immunity has been proven to be far superior to the so-called “protections” offered by the vaccines and it’s easy to conclude the Covid injections are completely unnecessary for servicemembers.
Then, there are the adverse reactions, including death, that have been reported so far. The sheer number of reports is exponentially higher than reports for the last two decades of all other vaccines combined. These details make Lt. Col. Long’s story even more infuriating.
“The third pilot had been vaccinated and felt like he was drunk, chronically fatigued within 24 hours after vaccination,” she continued. “The pilot told me he didn’t know what to do so he drank a lot of coffee to ‘wake himself up’ and continue to fly until he realized it wasn’t going away.”
In the past, a handful of reports of adverse reactions were enough to make healthcare and government officials hit the brakes on further injections. But instead of expressing concern and pushing the Lt. Col. Long’s story up the chain of command, she was suppressed. According to her report:
“After I reported to my command my concerns that in one morning I had to ground three out of three pilots due to vaccine injuries, the next day my patients were canceled, my charts were pulled for review, and I was told that I would not be seeing acute patients anymore, just healthy pilots there for their flight physical.”
Here’s the video:
NOW – U.S. Army Brigade Surgeon says “in one morning I had to ground 3 out of 3 pilots due to vaccine injuries” at a panel discussion hosted by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson.pic.twitter.com/jLlGwePPdQ
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) November 2, 2021
She then turned her attention to Anthony Fauci and the medical establishment driving the Biden-Harris regime’s policies on Covid-19. According to CD Media:
U.S. Army Flight Surgeon LTC Theresa Long today slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci and America’s medical agency establishment, saying ‘They are unfit to fly this airplane…’
LTC Long, a senior flight surgeon at the U.S. Army Flight School at Fort Rucker, submitted a signed affidavit earlier in the year warning the Covid vaccine mandate could make the entire Army pilot corp medically grounded. Of course, that is China’s and Biden’s intention all along, to destroy our military fighting capability. A civil airline pilot recently died in-flight after taking the vaccine.
[…]
Media Kinda-Sorta Forgets to Mention Doctor’s $2 Million From Pfizer
By Dr. Joseph Mercola | November 02, 2021
A Canadian doctor pushing COVID-19 vaccine shots for children ages 5 years and up who’s been featured in numerous media reports received nearly $2 million in Pfizer funding for vaccine research.
Whether it was intentional or if the media kinda-sorta forgot to mention the conflict, or if they simply didn’t bother doing their own research before using Dr. Jim Kellner as a lead adviser on the COVID shot isn’t clear. But what is clear is that Pfizer has given the University of Calgary professor and pediatrician $1.9 million, with $787,004 of it still being allocated until 2022.
Kellner didn’t attempt to hide his conflict of interest; it’s easily found in his publicly posted curriculum vitae, with the current funding explicitly stated.
Yet, according to True North news, “Kellner’s name turns up over 41 times and appears in numerous videos and articles on the topic of vaccination without any indication of how much money he has received from the vaccine manufacturer Pfizer.”
[…]
How Human Beings Evolved from Our Closest Ancestors
The Guardian: Neanderthal Cave Art Gibraltar
Episode 2: The Rise of Humanity
The Big History of Civilizations
Craig G Benjamin (2016)
Film Review
This presentation traces the gradual differentiation of human beings from their closest ancestors. Humans belong to the subfamily of Homininae, which includes gorillas, chimpanzees and other bipedal apes. Human beings and chimps share 98.4% of the same genes. Benjamin asserts they’re both descended from the same ancestor 7 million years ago.
According to fossil evidence, primates began walking upright 6.5 million years ago. Some anthropologists attribute this adaptation to a cooling climate that shrank the size of African forests. Standing on two legs allowed early Homininae to see over long savanna grasses and carry food more easily.
A second cooling period 2.5 million years ago possibly favored the rise (via natural selection) of the genus Homo. Most Homo species seem to have used fire for warmth and to scare off predators. Homo habilis, Homo erectus and Homo Neanderthalis are the best known immediate precursors to Homo sapiens.
Homo erectus was the first known species of the genus Homo to stand fully erect (around 1.8 million years ago). They were also the first species to develop semicircular ear canals allowing for running, jumping and dancing.
Early Homo species began migrating out of Africa (mainly to Asia and southern Europe) about 1.7 million years ago, as food shortages led them to follow migrating animals.
The first evidence of symbolic language appeared around 500,000 BC. There are European Neanderthal cave paintings from 200,000 BC suggesting some use of language, collective learning and primitive tools. When members of the species Homo sapiens began migrating out of Africa after 100,000 BP, Neanderthals weren’t able to compete with their superior language, tools and collective planning skills. Archeological evidence suggests their species died out about 40,000 BC.
The film can be viewed free on Kanopy.
November 1, 2021
LA Times: It’s harder to justify COVID vaccine for children if pandemic’s end is near
(Marcio Jose Sanchez / Associated Press)By Melissa HealyStaff Writer
If this were December 2020, or August 2021, the argument for vaccinating young children against COVID-19 would be easy to make.
With case counts surging and hospitals near capacity, giving young kids a jab would be counted on to slow transmission of a virus that’s killing thousands of Americans a day. The risk that inoculation could cause heart inflammation in young kids appears to be minuscule. Countering the coronavirus would clearly win out.
But it’s late October 2021, and the virus appears to be in retreat. New infections and deaths have both plunged more than 45% since a surge in September. And after multiple waves of infections, more than 1 in 4 U.S. residents have likely battled the coronavirus and gained some immunity as a result.
All that is good news, but it also means that widespread vaccination of the nation’s grade-school population offers less of an upside than it would have before.
That makes it harder to say there’s enough to be gained by the shot to offset the theoretical possibility of heart risks — a downside that’s not yet been measured.
These are the calculations experts are trying to make as they decide whether Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11 should be made available — and especially whether it should be recommended — for all 28 million U.S. children in this age group.
[…]
17 Pharma Henchmen Who Voted to Experiment on Your Kids
By Children’s Health Defense Team The 17 members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who voted 17-0 in favor of authorizing Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11 all have deep ties to pharma.
On Oct. 26, the membership of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted 17-0 in favor of lower-dose use of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in children ages 5 to 11.The 17 individuals — including an “acting” committee chair and 11 voting members who were temporary rather than core VRBPAC members — formulaically stated the injections’ benefits outweigh the risks in that age group.
Three days later, Dr. Janet Woodcock — a 35-year FDA veteran serving “temporarily” as commissioner — evoked her personal credentials “as a mother and a physician” when she predictably extended Pfizer’s emergency use authorization (EUA) to the 5-11 age group, having previously granted EUAs for adolescents (ages 12-15) and those age 16 and up.
This article highlights the conflicts of interest and financial entanglements with vaccine companies that enabled this rogues’ gallery’s immoral vote to expose 28 million U.S. children to the risk of injury and death.
These conflicts are ably documented by groups such as the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), in databases such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Open Payments and in the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) eBook, “Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health.”
What this information strongly suggests is that VRBPAC’s members — soi-disant (so-called) authorities in their respective fields — are thoroughly beholden to pharmaceutical, military, philanthropic and academic paymasters, with stock options, grants, patents and prestige clearly ranking well ahead of children’s safety.
This article also gives readers the tools and information to shun and shame these corrupt doctors and scientists — and their institutions. (See shunning action items at the end of the article.)
Sham deliberations
The Biden administration’s Oct. 20 release of a detailed pediatric vaccination plan, the administration’s pre-purchase of 65 million Pfizer pediatric doses and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) advance issuance of guidelines for vaccinating 5- to 11-year-olds are all clear signals that VRBPAC’s “deliberations” and vote were a sham — with the outcome predetermined.
VRBPAC’s Oct. 26 vote to foist the risky COVID vaccines onto defenseless children shows that even under intense and well-informed public pressure, the committee members were prepared to proceed with their shameful and shameless decision.
Buttressed by top-down directives, VRBPAC members apparently felt free to ignore 140,000 comments submitted to FDA by members of the public — an estimated 99.999% of whom objected to administering the vaccines to younger children.
On Oct. 25, CHD put FDA on notice that “CHD will seek to hold [FDA] accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them … at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.”
Around the world, doctors, scientists, parents and citizens who have questioned or opposed the need for pediatric COVID vaccination are horrified by the VRBPAC and FDA decisions, having witnessed the cascade of catastrophic post-injection adverse events in adolescents and young adults — including life-altering injuries that FDA and Pfizer refuse to acknowledge.
Two of VRBPAC’s “yes” votes came from CDC officials — hardly a disinterested or independent contingent. Most of the others who voted “yes,” including the 11 temporary voting members and acting chair, are affiliated with leading schools of medicine and public health heavily reliant on government grants and funding from entities like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (The Gates Foundation is a “major funder of universities” and gives two-thirds of those funds to U.S. institutions).
One National Institutes of Health (NIH) division director abstained, citing “limited safety and efficacy data.” The VRBPAC meeting also included one non-voting pharmaceutical industry representative from Merck.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is widely expected to endorse vaccination of 5- to 11-year-olds at its meeting on Nov. 2-3. As political economist Toby Rogers has noted, “Every person on [the ACIP membership] list has a financial conflict of interest. That is not good science.”
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-pfizer-covid-kids-pharma/
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
