Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 547
June 28, 2022
Court Again Blocks COVID Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers
The Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees will remain blocked until at least September after a federal appeals court on Monday agreed to reconsider its previous decision to reinstate the mandate.
The Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees will remain blocked until at least September after a federal appeals court on Monday agreed to reconsider its previous decision to reinstate the mandate.The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans will revisit its April ruling by a three-judge panel that the administration has the legal authority to require federal employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19, The Associated Press reported.
The new injunction will remain until the case can be argued before the full court’s 17 judges. According to The Epoch Times, the court has tentatively scheduled the en banc oral arguments for the week of Sept. 12.
Back-and-forth rulings on federal worker vaccine mandate since January
Biden introduced Executive Order 14043 in September 2021, requiring more than 3.5 million federal executive branch workers to undergo vaccination unless they secured approved medical or religious exemptions. The order did not allow workers to choose regular testing in place of getting the vaccine.
In December 2021, Feds for Medical Freedom — a grassroots organization with about 6,000 members throughout the federal civil service — sued the Biden administration and several federal agencies.
Other parties to the lawsuit included the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 918, a union representing employees in the Federal Protective Service and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and several other individuals and federal contractors.
The groups sought to block two COVID-19 vaccine mandates: one covering federal employees and the other for federal contractors.
Lawyers representing the Biden administration argued the Constitution gives the president, as the head of the federal workforce, the same authority as the CEO of a private corporation, and that therefore mandating vaccination was under the president’s authority.
The plaintiffs disagreed, countering that such action oversteps a president’s powers.
“The main thrust of the argument [of the plaintiffs],” attorney Bruce Castor Jr. told The Epoch Times in February, “is that the president doesn’t have the authority to issue an order like this, pursuant to the powers granted him in Article Two of the United States Constitution, and that’s the same argument that won the day in the Supreme Court regarding the 100 or more employees; the president doesn’t have that authority.”
Castor, a lawyer with the law firm van der Veen, Hartshorn & Levin, which represented the AFGE union, added:
“Instead of going through the checks and balances of congressional approval, which includes feedback from the public, the executive order cuts all that out. It just says, ‘My way or the highway.’
“Certainly, the Constitution grants powers like that to the president in foreign affairs and protecting the nation from aggression from foreign powers. But he doesn’t have the authority, with a sweep of the pen, to affect the lives of millions of people, bypassing Congress.”
In January, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown blocked the mandate, stating in his 20-page ruling that the president and his administration did not have the authority to impose such a mandate.
Brown questioned the president’s power to mandate federal employees undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment, writing in his decision:
“This case is not about whether folks should get vaccinated against COVID-19 — the court believes they should. It is not even about the federal government’s power, exercised properly, to mandate vaccination of its employees.
“It is instead about whether the president can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment.
“That, under the current state of the law as just recently expressed by the Supreme Court, is a bridge too far.”
In February, a 5th Circuit panel of judges refused to block Brown’s ruling pending appeal.
But after hearing arguments in March, a different panel of judges ruled 2-1 in early April that Brown did not have jurisdiction in the case, overturning the lower court’s Jan. 21 injunction against the mandate and ordering the district court to dismiss the case.
Meanwhile, Biden’s vaccine mandate continues to draw fire from health freedom groups who alleged federal overreach. Four groups — including America’s Frontline Doctors and Airline Employees for Health Freedom — filed amicus briefs in June supporting the Feds for Medical Freedoms in the case, Law 360 said.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/biden-administration-federal-covid-vaccine-mandate/
The US Government Is A Criminal Enterprise
Video Rebel’s Blog
The prices of chickens and eggs are rapidly increasing because the US government is using PCR tests to justify the killing of tens of millions of chickens, geese, turkeys and ducks. The US government and the men who act as if it they owned it prepared the way for today’s misery starting back in 2009 when Dr Yoshihiro Kawaoka at the University of Wisconsin crossed bird flu with Spanish flu.
Dr Kawaoka then crossed his bird flu-Spanish flu mix with 3 of the most contagious human flus available. He successfully allowed bird flu to go from centering in the bird’s beak to its lungs. Today human beings in the US and China have caught bird flu. He was not arrested for waging germ warfare. He was given more than $20 million as a reward from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Kawaoka is also an expert in Ebola.
Before February 24, 2022, the US had 26 biolabs in the Ukraine near the Russian border. The US had developed a drone which could spread bird flu to migrating birds and to domestic poultry.
Bill Gates is also heavily invested in African Swine flu research. Never know. There might be an outbreak in the US.
Prices are being pushed higher either by design or incompetence at the FDA. The FDA shut down baby formula production because they found bacteria inside the plant that was not in the formula. So today we import baby formula from Europe and Mexico.
There have been more than 95 highly suspicious fires at major food processing centers. This has hurt the supply chain, increased scarcity and raised prices.
The Biden administration has removed millions of acres of oil lease lands from potential production in order to raise the price of oil, diesel and natural gas. They are in the process of making it even harder for oil companies to build new refineries.
They have been working hard on another plan to impoverish the working and middle classes in America: Open Borders. Rents have increased to an average of $2,000 in the US. It is a lot more in areas impacted by immigration. Years ago I lived in an area in California where middle class Whites could afford to live. The rent today for a one bedroom apartment in my old neighborhood is $2,550 a month plus utilities.
NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) went into effect on January 1, 1994. Since then the US lost 80,000 manufacturing plants. There are 3,143 counties in the 50 US states. That is a loss of over 24 manufacturing plants per county. At the time NAFTA was passed there were fewer than 100,000 people in an average American county.
The US government added 67 million people to the population since NAFTA while destroying millions of high paying jobs for working people. The government has encouraged oxycodone, methamphetamine, fentanyl and other illegal drugs to keep impoverished Americans from rebelling at the poverty created for them by the federal government in Washington DC and by the billionaires of Wall Street.
In 1994 the US M2 Money Supply (Cash, checking account deposits, and easily-convertible near money) was $3.474 trillion vs $21.728 trillion today. That is an increase of 625%. And your wholly compromised corporate media is wondering why prices are going up.
The loss of jobs and the increase in rents and taxes has put a terrible squeeze on family budgets. By printing tens of trillions of dollars and using them to buy free stuff from overseas, politicians in Washington pretended to be acting to do good things for their voters. Of course when, not if, the dollar dies, wages will be cut 60% permanently, 100% for those who lose their jobs in the coming Depression.
In the summer of 2001 George W Bush told his allies that he was going to war against Afghanistan. On September 10, 2001 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld admitted on CBS Evening News that $2.3 trillion had gone “Missing” from the Pentagon. Neither he nor rabbi Dov Zakheim, the Comptroller of the DOD, could find that money. On the morning of September 11, 2001 more than 50 civilian and military auditors who had begun to look for the “Missing Money” were killed.
Also late in the evening of 9-10-2001 a billion dollars (in 2001 prices) of gold and silver bullion was moved out of the COMEX vault in Tower 4 of the Twin Towers. To date no politician and no paid corporate journalist has dared asked questions about who ordered the bullion to be moved and why.
To date no politician and no corporate journalist has asked either the FBI or the DOD for photos of the interior of the Pentagon taken in the aftermath of 911 so the public would know how the auditors were killed.
Dr Mark Skidmore proved from government sources that $21 trillion went missing from the DOD and HUD (Housing and Urban Development) from 1998 to 2015. He told the humorous story of the US Army one day receiving a check for $800 billion from the Treasury Department. They were told to plug the holes in their “Missing Money” accounts. Guess what? The generals lost the $800 billion!!
The US government decided to change Federal Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidelines so that now if anyone asks how a billion dollars disappeared, the bureaucrat can claim “national Security” and legally refuse to answer.
Why did George W Bush want to go to war against Afghanistan prior to 9-11-2001? It might be because the Afghan conflict flooded America with so much heroin that at one time the average age of a first time heroin user was just 14 years.
[…]
Via https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2022/06/28/the-us-government-is-a-criminal-enterprise/
Safe cures against COVID-19 being suppressed in favor of lethal clot shots
Dr Eddy Betterman
An op-ed has expounded on the suppression of safe cures against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) in favor of the more dangerous vaccines.
“Every time a treatment was discovered that improved COVID-19 patients’ outcomes or prevented transmission of the virus, forces stepped in to prevent the treatment from being used,” wrote Rhoda Wilson in a June 22 piece published in the Daily Expose.
“A growing number of natural treatments that could have prevented the spread of this virus, including most of the serious infections, have been blocked by these controllers. Incredibly, a law was passed that prevented clinical physicians from even suggesting such treatments.”
Wilson pointed to the medical establishment’s suppression on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) during the early days of the pandemic, in collusion with the government.
“When it was revealed that early use of HCQ could significantly reduce the severity of the disease and prevent the need for a ventilator, reports immediately surfaced from government agencies declaring that the drug was of no use, was dangerous and should not be used.”
“This occurred despite reports of HCQ’s benefits from doctors actually treating patients. In some states, prescriptions for HCQ were banned,” wrote Wilson,.
New York-based family physician Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko was among the doctors who attested to the effectiveness of HCQ. He shared to Reawaken America Tour founder and Brighteon.TV host Clay Clark how the establishment blocked the use of the drug when it was found to work against COVID-19 infection.
“In March [2020], my treatment protocol was based on the use of HCQ, zinc and the antibiotic azithromycin. But what happened on March 27, 2020 [is that] the ghoul – what I call [former New York] Gov. Andrew Cuomo – issued an executive order (EO) blocking pharmacies in New York state from dispensing HCQ,” recounted the Ukraine-born American doctor. “[It] was approved for other indications and it was safe, so I couldn’t understand why that was obstructed. I lost a few patients because of that EO [since] they couldn’t get medicine.”
According to Zelenko, people die from COVID-19 because of “the moronic doctor who delays care and the tyrannical government that obstructs access to life-saving medication.” (Related: Dr. Zelenko shares how the MSM smeared him for revealing the cure to COVID.)
Ivermectin also suppressed despite its effectivenessWilson also cited the establishment’s suppression of ivermectin, another drug that has shown promise against COVID-19 infection. The writer zeroed in on the efforts of Dr. Pierre Kory, co-founder and president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), to promote ivermectin.
During a December 2021 Senate hearing, the pulmonary and critical care specialist told lawmakers that he and other FLCCC members have spent “tirelessly reviewing the scientific literature to gain insight into this virus and the disease process and to develop effective treatment protocols.” The I-MASK+ protocol to prevent and treat early COVID-19 served as the fruit of this endeavor.
“Ivermectin is highly safe, widely available and low-cost,” Kory said. “In the last three to four months, emerging publications provide conclusive data on the profound efficacy of the [anti-parasitic], anti-viral and anti-inflammatory [drug] called ivermectin in all stages of the [COVID-19] disease.”
The FLCCC president added: “We now have data from over 20 well-designed clinical studies – 10 of them randomized, controlled trials – with every study consistently reporting large magnitude and statistically significant benefits in decreasing transmission rates, shortening recovery times, decreasing hospitalizations, or large reductions in deaths.”
Wilson wrote that Kory “made a number of discoveries that dramatically improved the survival of patients with serious COVID-19 cases.” Unlike physicians who espouse vaccines, the FLCCC head “has spent his professional life treating some of the sickest in the intensive care unit (ICU) settings, including hundreds of COVID-19 patients.”
“There is evidence that early treatment before deterioration occurs, can reduce hospitalization by 85 percent. But each discovery [Kory] made was intensely resisted and rejected by the medical elite and bureaucracies, at least until the proof became so overwhelming that they could no longer deny it. In the interim, thousands died as a result of the elite controller’s intransigence.”
“We see the same thing with ivermectin, another highly effective and safe medication,” concluded Wilson. “As bad as all this is, what’s worse is the alignment of forces being used to prevent safe methods from being used to stop this virus.”
[…]
Via https://dreddymd.com/2022/06/29/safe-cures-against-covid-19-suppressed-in-favor-lethal-clot-shots/
9th Century Islam: Cultural Synthesis and Gradual Islamification of the Steppes
Episode 21: Muslim Merchants and Mystics in Central Asia
Barbarian Empires of the Steppes (2014)
Dr Kenneth Harl
Film Review
After their failure to conquer China (see How 751 Muslim War with China Left Steppes Under Turkish Control), the Abbassid Caliphate ceased its military expansion efforts for 300 years. Instead its leaders focused mainly on cultural synthesis of the new territories they had conquered. They hired mainly Persian administrators, and their new capitol Baghdad (and Islamic cities modeled after Baghdad) modeled itself on Persian culture and civilization, speaking and writing in Aramaic,* Persian and Greek, rather than Arabic.
In the 9th century, Arab scholars began to study Christianity, Judaism, Zororastrianism, as well as Aristotelian and Hindu medical and mathematical texts. Following a 811-13 civil war (over succession), the Baghdad court adopted the Persian custom of keeping harems and eunuchs.
In the early 9th century, political power was decentralized through the appointment of emirs to rule provincial cities and regions. The Samanid emirs, who ruled a border area encompassing eastern Persia and Uzbekistan, became particularly prominent They poured the fortunes they earned from the slave** trade into massive monument building (mainly mosques, madrassa*** and mausoleums). In many cases the latter were erected on top of former Buddhist and Christian monasteries. Under this process, the steppes of Transoxiana gradually took on an Arab/Muslim appearance.
Under Samanid influence, large numbers of Silk Road merchants began converting to Islam for three main reasons.
Arabic had become the new commercial language, as both Persian and Turkic speakers adopted Arabic script for written communication.As Muslims, merchants were protected as members of the Ummah (Muslim community), even beyond the frontiers of the Caliphate.The Sufi mystics who traveled the Silk Road were very influential with Turks owing to their similarity to traditional nomadic shamans.The success of Islam in winning over Turkic nomads would inspire Catherine the Great to establish Islam as an official Russian religion – in the hope of winning the allegiance of steppes nomads living within Russian borders.
*A Semitic language, Aramaic originated in ancient Mesopotamia and for 3,000 years was the language of public life and administration of ancient kingdoms and empires. The Old and New Testament were initially written in Aramaic. Jesus spoke a Galilean dialect of Aramaic.
**Increasingly, Arab regiments were replaced with Turkish mercenaries or slaves. This dramatically increased the need for Turkish slave solders.
***Early Madrassa carried out charitable work in addition to educating male students about the Koran and Islam.
Film can be viewed free with library card on Kanopy.
June 27, 2022
As Prices Soar, It’s Time to Ditch Chemical Fertilizers
By Kathleen Merrigan
Chemical fertilizers applied to fields end up running into rivers and lakes, causing huge algae blooms that die and decompose, depleting oxygen in the water and creating “dead zones” that can’t support fish or other aquatic life.
Farmers are coping with a fertilizer crisis brought on by soaring fossil fuel prices and industry consolidation. The price of synthetic fertilizer has more than doubled since 2021, causing great stress in farm country.
This crunch is particularly tough on those who grow corn, which accounts for half of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer use.
The National Corn Growers Association predicts that its members will spend 80% more in 2022 on synthetic fertilizers than they did in 2021. A recent study estimates that on average, this will represent $128,000 in added costs per farm.
In response, the Biden administration announced a new grant program on March 11, “to support innovative American-made fertilizer to give U.S. farmers more choices in the marketplace.”
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will invest $500 million to try to lower fertilizer costs by increasing production. But since this probably isn’t enough money to construct new fertilizer plants, it’s not clear how the money will be spent.
I direct the Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems at Arizona State University and have held senior positions at the USDA, including serving as deputy secretary of agriculture from 2009 to 2013.
In my view, producing more synthetic fertilizer should not be the only answer to this serious challenge. The U.S. should also provide support for nature-based solutions, including farming practices that help farmers reduce or forgo synthetic fertilizers, and biological products that substitute for harsher chemical inputs.
Too much fertilizer in the wrong places
All plants need nutrients to grow, especially the “big three” macronutrients: nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Farmers can fertilize their fields by planting crops that add nitrogen to soil naturally or by applying animal manure and compost to soil (video below).
Since World War II, however, farmers have relied mainly on manufactured synthetic fertilizers that contain various ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, along with secondary nutrients and micronutrients.
That shift happened because manufacturers produced huge quantities of ammonium nitrate, the main ingredient in explosives, during the war; when the conflict ended, they switched to making nitrogen fertilizer.
Synthetic fertilizers have greatly enhanced crop yields and are rightly credited with helping to feed the world. But they aren’t used evenly around the world.
In poor regions like sub-Saharan Africa, too little fertilizer is available. In wealthier areas, abundant synthetic fertilizers have contributed to overapplication and serious environmental harm.
Excess fertilizer washes off of fields during storms and runs into rivers and lakes. There, it fertilizes huge blooms of algae that die and decompose, depleting oxygen in the water and creating “dead zones” that can’t support fish or other aquatic life.
This process, eutrophication, is a major problem in the Great Lakes, the Chesapeake Bay, the Gulf of Mexico and many other U.S. water bodies.
Excess nitrogen can also contaminate drinking water and threaten human health. And fertilizers, whether animal-sourced or synthetic, are a significant source of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.
What’s causing the crisis
One reason U.S. fertilizer prices have spiked is that farmers are beholden to imports. COVID-19 disrupted supply chains, especially from China, a major fertilizer producer. And the war in Ukraine has cut off access to potash, an important potassium source, from Russia and Belarus.
Another factor is that the fertilizer industry is highly concentrated. There is little competition, so farmers have no choice but to buy fertilizer at the market price. Several U.S. state attorneys general have called on economists to study anti-competitive practices in the fertilizer industry.
The USDA in June invited public comment on competition and supply chain concerns in fertilizer markets.
But out of 66 specific questions the department posed with this request, only one addresses what I believe is the key issue: “How might USDA better support modes of production that rely less on fertilizer, or support access to markets that may pay a premium for products relying on less fertilizer?”
#China’s
#fertilizer exports from January to May tumbled to the lowest level in four years, signaling that supply constraints persist on the global market even as prices retreat from a record. https://t.co/i9bW9Ojlpd pic.twitter.com/Meh9ePbB7p
— Farm Policy (@FarmPolicy) June 10, 2022
Rethinking how to grow crops
I see an opportunity for the Biden administration to take a fresh look at biological products as substitutes for synthetic fertilizers. This category includes biofertilizers and bionutrients — natural materials that provide crop nutrition.
Examples include microorganisms that extract nitrogen from the air and convert it into forms that plants can use, and fertilizers converted from manure, food and other plant and wood wastes.
Another category, biostimulants, comprises natural materials that enhance the uptake of plant nutrients, reduce crop stress and increase crop growth and quality.
Examples include algae and other plant extracts, microorganisms and humic acids — complex molecules produced naturally in soil when organic material breaks down.
In the past, critics dismissed natural products like these as “snake oil,” with little scientific evidence to show that they worked. Now, however, most experts believe that while much remains to be learned, current biofertilizers “offer huge potential in terms of new and more sustainable crop management practices.”
Studies have demonstrated many benefits from these products. They include less need for fertilizer, larger crop yields, enhanced soil health and fewer carbon emissions.
Large synthetic fertilizer companies like Mosaic, OCP and Nutrien are distributing, acquiring or investing in these biological technologies.
Agribusiness giant Bayer has partnered with Ginkgo Bioworks in a joint venture called Joyn whose mission is to create “sustainable ag biologicals for crop protection and fertility that meet or exceed the performance of their chemical counterparts.”
Offering more choices
Panicked U.S. farmers facing daunting fertilizer prices are looking for options.
In public comments on USDA’s fertilizer initiative, the Illinois Corn Growers Association urged the department to investigate why farmers apply fertilizers at levels higher than necessary, while others noted a shortage of agronomists sufficiently trained to guide farmers on how best to sustainably fertilize their crops.
I believe now is an opportune time for USDA to offer incentives for adopting biologicals, as well as practices that organic farmers use to replace synthetic fertilizers, such as crop rotation, composting and raising crops and livestock together.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chemical-fertilizers-algae-blooms-dead-zones/
WHO Behind FDA Scheme to Skip All Future Clinical Trials for COVID Vaccines
By Toby Rogers, Ph.D. The “Future Framework” is coming from the World Health Organization, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO, so Gates is likely directing the play.
Editor’s note: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tomorrow, June 28, will vote on the “Future Framework,” a scheme that would allow Pfizer and Moderna to “reformulate” COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in perpetuity, without conducting clinical trials on the new vaccines. Click here to tell the FDA to vote no on the “Future Framework.”Introduction: The FDA always rigs the game on behalf of Pharma
Late Friday afternoon, the FDA released its agenda for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting that will vote on the Orwellian “Future Framework” on Tuesday, June 28.
Then on Saturday morning, the FDA released a briefing document in connection with this scheme to end science as we know it in connection with future COVID-19 shots. (Much appreciation to the brilliant James Roguski for alerting me to these documents.)
In this article, I will explain what is in the briefing document, what is likely to happen at the meeting and what can be done about it.
The FDA’s ‘Future Framework’ briefing document
The briefing document is 18 pages of text, 1.5 line spacing, with just 19 references — 9 of which are pre-prints or from the CDC’s in-house newsletter Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) which means they are not peer-reviewed.
Any true believer in The Narrative(TM) could have written this in a few hours. To base the entire future of COVID-19 shots on this glorified undergrad term paper is madness.
As I predicted, even though the April 6 meeting was presented as an exploratory initial conversation that reached no conclusions whatsoever, the “Future Framework” is now being presented by the FDA as a done deal, fait accompli, you’d have to be crazy to insist on proper safety studies.
The core argument of the briefing document is hilarious (or rather, it would be hilarious if it was not a plan to permanently institutional genocide and hide the evidence). In several places the FDA argues (colloquialisms mine):
1. These COVID-19 shots work great, miracles really, incredibly effective, boy howdy do they work well! Boosters too, total home run, the Israelis even have 10-weeks of data showing that they might help old people. What more evidence could you want?
2. Okay, well, it depends on what you mean by work. These shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death, even though that’s why we licensed them. Any protection wears off fairly quickly, but It’s Not Our Fault(TM) because This Wily Virus(TM) mutates too fast and no one told us that it would ever mutate.
3. So these shots must be reformulated but we cannot possibly ask Lord Pharma to do proper clinical trials ever again because we already know that these shots work great (see point #1)!
The briefing document literally states:
“The evaluation of modified vaccines for the purpose of vaccine strain composition decisions will need to rely mainly on comparative immunogenicity data due to the time constraints involved in vaccine manufacturing and clinical efficacy evaluation.”
Did you catch that? The evaluation “will need to rely on” (no decision to be made here) measures other than actual health outcomes because of “time constraints.”
Ah, $cience!
Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax are all developing reformulated COVID-19 shots. But they know that the FDA is not going to look at health outcomes so they are going to great lengths to jack up the antibody response.
Pfizer tested a double-strength dose (60 mcg of mRNA instead of 30 mcg) even though they had previously ruled out a higher dose because of safety concerns. So the antibody levels are through the roof.
But the VRBPAC admitted on April 6 that there are no known correlates of protection (meaning: antibody levels do not tell you who will be immune) so these antibody measures are medically meaningless.
Sane people realize that if you turbo charge the immune response, you may also turbo charge adverse events. But the “Future Framework” allows pharmaceutical companies to skip clinical trials altogether.
Furthermore, all of these companies are developing shots to target the original Omicron strain (BA.1) even though it has already been supplanted by other variants (BA.4 and BA.5).
The FDA and these companies claim that shots targeting BA.1 will be effective against later variants but I do not know how they can possibly argue that given the total absence of actual health data.
Words that you will NOT find in the FDA “Future Framework” briefing document:
original antigenic sin,antibody-dependent enhancement,prion disease,myocarditis,VAERSadverse events, orside effects.So the FDA is literally not looking out for any of the worst-case scenario possibilities.
The “Future Framework” is a plan to base the entire COVID-19 vaccine program on magical thinking rather than science.
What’s likely to happen at the VRBPAC meeting on Tuesday, June 28
The cartel is predictable because they follow a playbook and they use the same cast of characters over and over again.
[…]
None of their data will be peer-reviewed so it will all be fanciful fiction — 95% to 100% efficacy based entirely on belief.
[…]
If the FDA stated plainly what they are up to there would be riots.
What is to be done
We only have about 24 hours to act so let’s leave it all on the field!
Please submit a formal comment to the regulations.gov website stating that the FDA must reject the “Future Framework” and that all reformulated COVID-19 shots must go through proper human clinical trials. The docket number is FDA-2022-N-0905.
The docket will close Monday night June 27 at 11:59 Eastern time. Click here to go to the relevant page on the regulations.gov website and look for the blue comment button in the upper left-hand corner.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-fda-gates-future-framework-covid-vaccines/
CIA ops, commandos in Ukraine: Can we just admit we are fighting this war?
Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
Responsible Statecraft
‘No boots on the ground’ seems like an empty assurance considering this new report from the New York Times.
The Central Intelligence Agency is operating in Kyiv and has been for some time, according to new reporting by the New York Times. So, while Biden has insisted on “no U.S. boots on the ground” in Ukraine, there are soft-soled operatives, otherwise known as American spies, providing intelligence and other tactical assistance to Ukraine in its war with Russia.
Sounds like Americans are in this war, like it or not.
The news, based on sourcing from current and former U.S. government officials, is part of a broader report about a “stealthy network” of U.S. and European commandos and spies in “cells” run by the Pentagon’s European Command “to speed allied assistance to Ukrainian troops.” Much of this is operating from military bases in France and Germany and elsewhere. But as the NYT points out, there are European commandos and CIA agents working on the inside.
The commandos are not on the front lines with Ukrainian troops and instead advise from headquarters in other parts of the country or remotely by encrypted communications, according to American and other Western officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters. But the signs of their stealthy logistics, training and intelligence support are tangible on the battlefield.
Several lower-level Ukrainian commanders recently expressed appreciation to the United States for intelligence gleaned from satellite imagery, which they can call up on tablet computers provided by the allies. The tablets run a battlefield mapping app that the Ukrainians use to target and attack Russian troops.
As usual it appears that the administration wants to have it both ways: assure the American people that it is being “restrained” and that we are not “at war” with the Russians, but doing everything but planting a U.S. soldier and a flag inside Ukraine. The CIA, as you will recall, has increasingly had an operational combat focus since 9/11, running elaborate secret prisons overseas, engaging in enhanced interrogations (torture) and manhunting with armed drones and commando teams over the last 20 years. There may be a sliver of daylight between the CIA operatives there today and the U.S. special forces that left Ukraine after Russia invaded, but given the circumstances, is it a meaningful one? Is it all about who is pulling the trigger?
The Russians may not see the distinction and consider this news as further evidence that their war is more with Washington and NATO than with Ukraine. For this and other reasons the NYT report has sparked a heated debate on social media.
What possible value add could the public bring to the debate? They don’t have access to the details or the situational awareness.
— John Sipher (@john_sipher) June 26, 2022
Heer, who is a writer for The Nation, responded to Sipher by saying that military decisions are “subject to civilian oversight,” to which Sipher, whose Twitter profile says he is at the Atlantic Council and is “former CIA Clandestine Service,” quipped, that’s to be done “through elected representatives.”
Right. And I have a bridge to sell you in Fallujah.
Perhaps two percent of Congress through the House and Senate intelligence committees is aware the CIA is operating in Kyiv but like everything — from the 20-year war in Afghanistan to specific operations like the assassination of Qasem Soleimani in 2020 — the whole process has a whiff of retroactive rubberstamping with no room (or interest) for debate in Congress. Operational secrecy and security are no doubt the fig leaf, but when we’re not supposed to be in a war we aren’t supposed to be in a war, right?
“I don’t think people realize that right now the spigot from Congress is fully open. Money, weps, intel, whatever they need,” tweeted Jack Murphy, journalist and Iraq/Afghanistan vet. “The American public is not being appropriately informed about what our government is up to as basically every single op DOD/CIA proposes is getting the green light.”
But then again the CIA acted with impunity through much of its formative years, and it wasn’t until the Church Committee brought all the nastiness to light in the 1970s that the American public was made aware of it. Still, the agency continued to fight bloody proxy wars in places like El Salvador and Nicaragua — and let’s not forget Afghanistan in the 1980s. Are we to believe that there is any more stringent oversight today?
Which brings us to the million dollar question — what do we expect to come from this particular (proxy war) for which the U.S. is engaged well beyond just sending assistance. My Quincy Institute colleague George Beebe, who spent years engaged in Russia analysis for the CIA, wonders if Washington even knows how far it is going here.
“This is reminiscent of the ‘sunk cost’ phenomenon that caused Washington to increase its involvement in Vietnam from a handful of advisors to half a million troops in direct combat,” he tells me.
[…]
New Hampshire Enshrines Medical Autonomy Over Vaccines
On June 24th, 2022, HB1495 was signed into law. This bill prevents the state from requiring businesses to check vaccination statuses as a condition of employment.
From the bill:
The state of New Hampshire and its political subdivisions shall not:
I. Require any business to require the vaccination of any customer or employee except as specified in RSA 141-C:20-a, I; or
II. Require any business to require or check for the possession of any documentation for certifying vaccination or immunity status.
III. This section shall not apply to state agencies certifying a medical facility, or a provider which is subject to a valid and enforceable Medicare or Medicaid condition of participation that imposes a vaccination requirement.
Note that this does not prevent free-association of businesses; businesses in NH are free to require vaccinations if they choose. The state simply is not authorized to require that of them.
Also important to consider is that New Hampshire has some of the lowest unemployment in the country, meaning that there is no shortage of employee choice on this matter.
Religious and medical exemptions for healthcare providers requiredHB1604 was signed into law on June 24th. This bill requires state hospitals and medical facilities to grant religious and medical exemptions from vaccination requirements, provided that any request for a medical exemption shall include the supporting documentation required by federal regulation.
Big Pharma is about to be sued out of existence because “fraud vitiates everything”
Rose Rambles
There is now an overwhelming body of hard evidence that categorically proves that the American Big Pharmaproducers of Covid ‘vaccines’ committed intentional and egregious fraud in the roll-out of their extremely dangerous and deadly injections.
The true scope and magnitude of their fraudulent corporate conduct is only now coming to light; nevertheless, the irrefutable proof of premeditated fraud which has already been accumulated is so incriminating that Big Pharma will eventually collapse.
Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are not the only Big Pharma companies that have poisoned to death and/or sickened countless American citizens; all the other vaccine manufacturers are also culpable of perpetrating a multi-decade criminal conspiracy. For example, both the mandatory childhood vaccination schedules and voluntary adult flu shot programs have been rife with fraud and malicious intent as the rapidly growing number of serious vaccine injuries and deaths clearly indicates. See: FLASHBACK: COURT RULES VACCINES CONTRIBUTE TO AND CAUSE SIDS DEATHS
In point of fact, the great number of vaccine-induced injuries and post-vaccination deaths suffered by school children, which have occurred uninterruptedly over many years, is proof positive that Big Pharma knowingly committed a murderous fraud as they continue to today.
Let’s face it: When even a former BlackRock executive comes out and makes these damning statements, the end is near for the entire Big Pharma international crime syndicate.
Intentional Vax Fraud Committed by Big PharmaStrips Liability Shield — Former Blackrock ExecConclusion
It’s not only Big Pharma that’s in BIG trouble with the American people.
The corporate Mainstream Media is also a willful accomplice in this genocidal scheme that is killing trusting citizens across the USA. For they could never have deliberately killed this many people were those two co-conspirators — Big Media & Big Pharma — not thicker than thieves.
If there’s any doubt about the sheer depth and breadth of this highly organized and well planned Covid depopulation scheme, the following video will forever erase it.
BOMBSHELL! Opening Statements at Grand Jury InvestigationInto Covid Crimes Against Humanity (Video)
All of this unprecedented litigation concerning COVID-19 crimes against humanity translates to one very firm and unmistakable conclusion as far as the Big Pharmacorporate criminals are concerned:
Which means that Big Pharma will crash and burn in a day and a night after the U.S. citizenry takes them to court for the massive and highly calculated fraud that defines their unparalleled Covid crime spree. Because once they committed that intentional fraud, they immediately relinquished their corporate shield of liability.
Even more significantly, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson recklessly exposed themselves — both corporately and the individual corporate officers, scientists and physicians — to criminal prosecution for mass murder.
Given the enormity and gravity of this ongoing global crime wave, the only expected outcome of the future legal proceedings is that these rogue companies will be shut down as fast as they terminated the Arthur Andersen accounting firm in 2002 after the Enron Scandal was fully prosecuted.
KEY POINT: It was the U.S. Supreme Court that handed down the original landmark decision which essentially ruled that “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING” via: United States v. Throckmorton 98 U.S. 61. “There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments” reads the final decree. Therefore, Big Pharma, as a result of its many patently fraudulent Covid ‘vaccine’ endeavors, has forever nullified all indemnification agreements, legislated protections, and especially its corporate shield of liability.
This is why “Fraud Vitiates Everything” is such a critical legal basis upon which to launch every civil lawsuit against and criminal prosecution of the involved Big Pharma vaccine makers. In light of the historical fact that their fraudulent conduct has been institutionalized over decades, there are now volumes of actionable evidence that can be used to take these corporate serial criminals down—FOREVER!
[…]
June 26, 2022
‘Squad’ Members Call on Biden To Declare Public Health Emergency in Wake of Roe Ruling
Robert Schmad
Washington Free Beacon
A coalition of 20 black congresswomen, led by “Squad” member Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.), on Thursday wrote a letter to President Joe Biden that urged him to declare a public health emergency in anticipation of a Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
The Court on Friday overturned the seminal 1973 abortion-rights decision.
The congresswomen urged the president to use “any and all executive authorities” to work against the Court’s decision—including “declaring a public health emergency and national emergency.”
The Court’s decision does not prohibit abortion but rather returns the issue to the states, a majority of which allow the procedure. Just 5 percent of Americans consider abortion the most important issue facing the country, Gallup reported last month. By contrast, 55 percent say that inflation under President Joe Biden is the most important issue, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
The letter says that pro-life measures are “unprecedented and calculated attacks on our bodily autonomy” that harm “the lives and freedom of Black women.” While black women get more abortions than women of any other race, just 32 percent of black Americans support abortion on demand without restrictions, a Gallup poll found in 2020.
The letter’s call comes as threats of pro-abortion violence intensify against churches, pro-life organizations, and Supreme Court justices. While the Department of Homeland Security sounded the alarm about a wave of violence following the Court’s decision, the Biden administration, which supports abortion rights, has done little to stem the tide.
Pressley was not the only prominent far-left Democrat to sign the letter. Fellow “Squad” members Ilhan Omar (Minn.) and Cori Bush (Mo.), as well as Los Angeles mayoral candidate Karen Bass, also called for a post-Roe public health emergency.
[…]
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
