Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 478
December 15, 2022
Melbourne has started installing defibrillators outside homes, ensuring easy access for increased sudden cardiac arrest
AUSTRALIA: Melbourne has started installing defibrillators outside homes, making sure every resident has easy access to help with the increase in sudden cardiac arrests.
— Wittgenstein (@backtolife_2023) December 14, 2022
Source: 7 News Australia (Youtube) pic.twitter.com/wZuYtqSuZS
Data of 72 Million Insured Shows “Sudden, Unexpected Deaths” Has Exploded in Germany Since 2021
Sudden and unexpected deaths in per quarter since 2016. Chart: Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV),
“I mmediately after vaccination started on December 27, 2020, sudden and unexpected deaths exploded in Germany.”
This is shown by just released data of the 72 million insured by Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV):”
The number has more than doubled since the vaccine was introduced at the end of 2020, jumping from about 6000 per quarter to 14,000 currently. The difference, 8000, means more than 80 people each and every day are dying suddenly and mysteriously.
The German analysis since the start of Corona vaccination show the population has seen drastic changes in disease patterns and deaths. This is the result of data from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), which Martin Sichert was able to evaluate exclusively together with data expert Tom Lause, and made public at a press conference earlier today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfB6ZFUgIEk
Frightening findings
“Patient data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) on side effects of the Corona vaccinations provide frightening findings,” tweets Prof. Stefan Homburg. “With the start of Corona mass vaccinations, the number of those who died ‘suddenly and unexpectedly’ jumped more than fourfold compared to previous years. In each quarter, beginning with the first quarter of 2021, more sudden and unexpected deaths were recorded by panel physicians than in any total year from 2016 to 2020.”
The task and responsibility of monitoring vaccine safety falls in the hands of Germany’s Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), which appears to have grossly neglected analyzing the KBV data – a duty it is obligated to do in the interest of public safety.
The German government in 2020 indeed standardized the use of the insurance data to protect against immunization damage, but the current government and the PEI have stunningly ignored the law.
German parliamentarian Martin Sichert and data analyst Tom Lausen have since forced forced the release of the data and the shocking results.
[…]
Ancient Greek Architecture: From Quarry to Temple
Episode 3: From Quarry to Temple – Building in Stone
Understanding Greek and Roman Technology: From the Catapult to the Parthenon
Dr Stephen Ressler (2013)
Film Review
In this lecture, Ressler covers the mechanics of stone architecture – how the Greeks and Romans extracted stone blocks from quarries, lifted them into place and fitted them together.
In the 12th century BC, Mycenaeans who preceded Greek civilization first perfected a type of stone building described as “Cyclopian.” It involved fitting together differently shaped polygonal stones to make them lock them into position.
In the 9th century, a timber shortage (with the peninsula’s native forests decimated for ship buildings) forced their Greek descendants to resume building with stone. Known as ashlar masonry, the method they devised fitted rectangular blocks in identical horizontal rows and was firmly established by the 5th century. Dresser believes that Greek traders most likely brought the technology home from Egypt.
Greece had abundant limestone and marble quarries, with the latter becoming the preferred construction material by the 6th century BC. Moving stepwise down the quarry walls, quarry workers cut out blocks of marble with iron-tipped double sided picks. After extracting the base of each block with wedges and a sledge hammer, they transported them on wooden rollers pulled by 17 oxen.
Ancient Greek Quarry
They assembled cylindrical marble segments known as drums to build columns.
Following transport, stone masons “dressed” the blocks and drums (to insure their uniformity) using three kinds of chisels (point chisel, claw chisel and rasp chisel).
Using no mortar, Greek stone masons fitted blocks together using a process known as enarthrosis. Recessing the ends of each block so that only the edges made contact, masons also left wedge shaped notches on the upper and lower faces. Construction laborers would fit them with iron connectors to hold them snugly in place.
To hold the marble drums making up each column in place, masons drove hardwood plugs into the center of each drum and drove iron dowls down the center of the plugs.
Greek laborers moved the blocks into place with a temporary ramp allowing them to push them into place on rollers. Later (due to labor shortages), they used construction cranes powered by windlasses.*
*See Technology in Ancient Greece and Rome
Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.
December 14, 2022
‘Corporate Greed at Its Worst’: 9 Utility Giants Dished Out $11 Billion to Shareholders as Consumers Struggled to Pay Bills
By Jake Johnson
An analysis released Tuesday shows the nine largest U.S. energy utility companies raked in nearly $14 billion in combined profits during the first three quarters of 2021 — and dished out roughly $11 billion to their wealthy shareholders.
With colder winter weather looming, a new analysis released Tuesday shows that the nine largest energy utility companies in the U.S. raked in nearly $14 billion in combined profits during the first three quarters of this year — and dished out roughly $11 billion to their wealthy shareholders — as tens of millions of U.S. households struggled to pay their utility bills due to soaring costs.
The watchdog group Accountable.US found that NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, Southern Company, Dominion Energy, Constellation Energy, Eversource Energy, Entergy Corporation, DTE Energy and CMS Energy Corporation brought in $13.8 billion in the first nine months of this fiscal year.
The firms, the nine largest in the U.S. by market capitalization, returned over $11.2 billion to shareholders during that period in the form of dividends and stock buybacks.
The utility giants‘ massive profits have come at a cost to U.S. households, roughly 20 million of which are behind on their utility payments as providers continue to raise rates across the U.S., pushing home energy costs to unaffordable levels and prompting warnings of a “tsunami of shutoffs.”
The Center for Biological Diversity recently estimated that utilities have shut off households’ power 440,000 times across 15 states that have made their rates publicly available, a large increase from last year.
“Well-heeled utility company CEOs are holding consumers’ feet to the fire with exorbitant energy prices,” Liz Zelnick, director of Accountable.US’ Economic Security and Corporate Power program, said in a statement Tuesday.
“Not because they have to, judging by their own high profits and generous giveaways to wealthy investors — but because they can with colder weather on the horizon.”
“To prey on families who use a necessary service with unreasonable and unjustified rate hikes is corporate greed at its worst,” Zelnick added.
The Accountable.US analysis shows that the same large utility companies raking in huge profits and paying their executives massive pay packages are driving price increases nationwide.
Southern Company’s Georgia subsidiary, for instance, “had a near-12% rate hike approved in June — and in August, its Tennessee subsidiary was granted a rate hike that would result in typical monthly home heating bills rising by about 25%,” the analysis notes.
NEW REPORT: 1 in 6 U.S. homes are behind on utility bills. Yet, the Top 9 U.S. utility companies hiked rates in 2022 while reaping nearly $14 billion in profit.
— Accountable.US (@accountable_us) December 13, 2022
Nearly 20 million households are struggling against rising energy bills. https://t.co/JcjZMbvmOJ pic.twitter.com/RT4Hk6JVNS
NBC News reported in October that “nationwide, investor-owned utilities have requested rate increases amounting to nearly $12 billion from the beginning of the year through the end of August.”
Zelnick argued that utility giants’ price hikes are part of a broader trend of corporate price-gouging, a practice that companies frequently excuse by pointing to higher overall inflation throughout the economy.
“Like so many other industries during the pandemic, utility companies have chased higher and higher profits and enriched investors rather than keep prices stable for working families,” said Zelnick.
“While the economy is seeing signs of slowing inflation, it is clear corporate greed continues to be a primary driver of high costs on everything from groceries to heating bills — a problem that won’t be solved by the Fed’s one-track-minded policy of excessive interest rate hikes that threaten millions of jobs.”
Utility firms’ greedy behavior throughout the coronavirus pandemic has drawn the attention of progressive lawmakers such as Reps. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), who in September introduced a resolution that would recognize access to utilities such as electricity and heating as a basic human right.
The Resolution Recognizing the Human Rights to Utilities has not yet received a vote.
“Utilities are the foundation we build our lives upon,” Tlaib said in a statement upon introduction of the measure.
“In the richest country the world has ever known, it is an outrage that millions of Americans struggle with utility insecurity, substandard and dangerous services, and inhumane shutoffs.”
“It’s time to change the conversation around what we all deserve, take the profit motive out of providing the basics of a good life, and give every American the opportunity to thrive,” Tlaib added.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/utility-bills-corporate-greed-shareholder-profits/
John Bolton Coauthored Strategy on Creating Bioweapons to Ensure US ‘Global Leadership’
Bolton remains one of the world’s most notorious (and unrepentant) war criminals.His continued presence at the very core of US power testifies to the moral bankruptcy of this system.
By Ilya Zukanov
Sputnik International
Some people call Bolton a “lunatic”, but this hides the evil of a professional war criminal.
Russia’s Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection Troops have released trove after trove of confidential documents detailing Pentagon bioweapons programs across the globe, particularly in Ukraine. US officials and media have broadly ignored the revelations, but part of the information has been corroborated in independent reporting.
John Bolton, the Washington arch-neocon who served as one of the architects of George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq, and as former President Donald Trump’s national security advisor before resigning in disgrace, was intimately involved in formulating the US drive for global dominance in bioweapons research, a top Russian military official has indicated.
“The ongoing research by the United States to enhance the pathogenic properties of microorganisms is forcing us to rethink the statements of US officials in charge of countering biological threats. One such official is John Bolton, who [previously] served as the US national security advisor,” Russian RCBP Troops chief Igor Kirillov said in a briefing Saturday.
The “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” paper’s reference to the need for “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” for neocons to be able to implement their empire-building plans raised eyebrows among journalists and historians in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, which took place one year after the paper was published.
New Documents
As is typical in his briefings, Kirillov accompanied his presentation with a fresh trove of documents, including papers related to US efforts to build up the country’s military-biological potential. Unlike in earlier briefings, which featured classified materials, most of the documents cited in Saturday’s presentation are already publicly available, with the MoD’s take focusing on analyzing what is said and reading between the lines to uncover their implications.
The docs included the National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan, a policy document published by the White House in October detailing US efforts ostensibly aimed at “countering biological threats, enhancing pandemic preparedness, and achieving global health security.” Kirillov pointed out that the strategy has received $88 billion in funding for its implementation over five years, including $17 billion during the first year.
Pointing to the document’s statement that “biological risk management requires understanding and assessing biological risks and taking steps to mitigate those risks, regardless of whether they originate in the United States or abroad,” Kirillov cited this as evidence of US attempts to interfere in the internal affairs of other states.
The officer also pointed to US plans to continue the study of the pathogens of especially dangerous infectious diseases endemic to certain geographical areas, and efforts to cover up accusations of military biological activity by inviting the participation of civilian health organizations and scientists to work as contractors for the Pentagon.
[…]
“Thus, within the framework of the strategy, the United States intends to strengthen global control over the biological situation in the world, and reserve the right to conduct ‘dual purpose’ research, including outside US territory,” Kirillov said.
[…]
Kirillov also pointed to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s (DTRA) Strategy for the years 2022-2027, whose unclassified portion similarly acknowledges the “dual use nature” of biological research, and prioritizes US and allied forces’ “ability to compete and, when necessary, win against potential WMD-armed adversaries,” including by “highlighting WMD warfighting challenges and adversary vulnerabilities through strategic and operational analysis, and supporting DoD plans and exercises focused on CWMD threats.The Russian MoD previously implicated the DTRA in a broad range of bioweapons-related activities around the globe, including the operation, funding, construction, and modernization of biolabs across Ukraine working with dangerous pathogens since at least 2005.
Kirillov also pointed to the heavily redacted 345-page trove of recently retrieved by Judicial Watch through a FOIA request regarding the Pentagon’s biological activities in Ukraine, including financing to Pentagon contractor Black and Veatch. The contractor and others like it received tens of millions of dollars to assist in a range of biowarfare-related programs across the Eastern European nation, from research into plague and typhus to diseases targeting agriculture, flora, fauna and even certain ethnic groups.
“The published documents once again confirm the extent of cooperation between Kiev and Washington, as well as attempts to establish control over pathogens in Ukrainian laboratories through the introduction of the Pathogen Asset Control System (PACS), elements of which were transferred to Ukraine under the label ‘property of the US Government,'” Kirillov said.
“This corresponds to the materials at our disposal,” the Russian officer said, pointing out that the MoD has already detailed how PACS has been used to enable the Pentagon to monitor in real time the location and use of deadly pathogens in laboratories across the planet, and provide it access to the results of ethically and legally dubious experimentation.
[…]
Via https://www.greanvillepost.com/2022/12/07/john-bolton-coauthored-strategy-on-creating-bioweapons-to-ensure-us-global-leadership-russian-mod/
Placentas from Covid-Jabbed Women Inflamed, Calcified and Full of Spike Proteins
Dr Eddy Betterman
Oncologists everywhere are reporting that cancers attacking reproductive organs are skyrocketing ever since the “vaccines” for covid were unleashed via Operation Warp Speed.
Dr. Ryan Cole, an Idaho-based frontline physician who is seeing it all firsthand, says oncologists and other colleagues in the medical field are observing unusually high rates of cancer. They are also seeing unusual cancers, including those of the vaginal tract and uterus – and especially leiomyosarcoma in particular.
In addition to the extremely high rates of miscarriage and fetal mortality he has been seeing, Cole says that human fertility is clearly on the decline as the after-effects of the jabs become increasingly more apparent. (Related: Last year, Cole warned that cancer rates among the jabbed had increased 20-fold.)
“People are sending me placentas,” Cole told Dr. Drew Pinsky on his radio program. “These placentas are the wrong size for their gestational age; these placentas are calcified; these placentas have antibodies in them; these placentas have spike protein in them; these placentas have induced excess inflammation.”
You can watch a video clip of Cole’s interview on Dr. Drew’s show at the RAIR Foundation website.
Cole is urging his medical colleagues to do the pathology and look for unusual signs such as these in their patients. He issued a plea on the program for those in the medical field to “start looking at tissues of the deceased; start looking at those fetuses that didn’t make it to full term; start looking at the placentas.”
“Start taking your surgical cases in specimens that are unusual in multiple-jabbed individuals and start looking for what could be causing it,” Cole added. “Obviously, I have my suspicions.”
A pregnant nurse forced to get jabbed to remain employed lost her baby in uteroOne specific example Cole shared is the case of a nurse, eight months pregnant, who was forced to get injected in order to keep her job. That nurse’s baby ended up dying in utero.
There are many such cases like this, though they often never get reported due to fears within the medical industry about bucking the narrative. To suggest anything other than “safe and effective” for these injections often means getting let go and losing one’s professional clout.
“I think this is the problem we are having with this group think of the ‘safe and effective,’ no problems attitude,” Cole said. “But my counterargument is, ‘look, read – it’s hiding in plain sight. We need to do the science.”
Cole’s observations are shared by Dr. Ute Kruger, a Swedish physician who has similarly seen an explosion of cancer, oftentimes of rare varieties, among previously healthy young people who got injected for the Fauci Flu.
Since Tony Fauci, the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Economic Forum (WEF), and many other globalist entities have declared themselves to be the science, Cole’s suggestion that “we need to do the science” will probably not get very far apart from a massive upheaval of the current power structure.
[…]
Construction and Fabrication Materials in Greco-Roman Civilization
Copper ore
Episode 2: The Substance of Technology – Materials
Understanding Greek and Roman Technology: From the Catapult to the Parthenon
Dr Stephen Ressler (2013)
Film Review
The main building materials used during the Greco-Roman period were stone, wood, clay, copper, bronze and iron. According to Ressler all were available before the classical era.* Each featured a unique combination of compressive and tensile strength,** workability (ability to be molded or carved) and durability (resistance to rot, corrosion, fire, etc).
The first stone blades were produced by pre-human hominids 2 million years ago. Soon after homo sapiens evolved around 300,000 BC, they learned to construct stone axes with wooden handles.***
Although stone, owing to its high compressive strength, was an ideal building material for the columns and walls of Greek temples, wood was was better for roofs because it bends without breaking. Yet because it lacks durability, no roofs of Greek temples have survived.
Clay is a highly workable building material because it can be molded into any shape. Clay bricks are still used in third world countries where wood is scarce. It has low to moderate compressive strength, near zero tensile strength and limited durability (clay brick structures rarely last longer than 30 years).
Around 2600 BC, human beings discovered that clay fired in a kiln becomes more durable as tera cotta. The latter was used widely in Rome for roofs and dishes. In Sumeria it was also the world’s first media for preserving written script.
After recognizing the beneficial effect of heating clay, people began heating limestone to make lime, wood to make charcoal and mineral ores to make metals. Pretty much equal in tensile and compressive strength, metals are extremely malleable. They can be melted down and cast in molds, and hammering them into thin sheets makes them even stronger.
Copper was the first metal humans used. Around 9000 BC, people living in the Middle East collected pure copper lumps from streams, melting them down to make into tools and ornaments. It would be another 5,000 years before they learned to smelt copper from copper ore (found in Mesopotamia, Anatolia and Cypress). When copper ore and charcoal are smelted, carbon monoxide from the charcoal combines with oxides in the ore to produce carbon dioxide and pure copper.
With a melting point of 2000 degrees, copper is easier to smelt than iron which melts at 2800 degrees. However even copper smelting requires massive amounts of charcoal. Twenty pounds of charcoal (with seven pounds of wood required for each pound of charcoal) produces one pound of charcoal. According to Stressor, copper and bronze production caused massive deforestation, explaining modern Greece’s desolate landscape.
Once our ancestors learned to add tin to copper to make bronze, they found it was stronger than copper and easier to cast because it had a lower melting point.
The first iron originated from meteorites and was a a luxury item for several thousand years before it was smelted. Around the second millenium BC, humans learned to smelt iron from hematite and charcoal. At 2200 degrees (the highest temperature they could reach), the two combined to produce an impure “bloom” that had to be hammered to remove impurities. Iron produced in this way was referred to as wrought iron. Cast iron wasn’t produced (outside of China) until the Middle Ages.
Prior to the Middle Ages. iron and bronze were used interchangeably. More plentiful than copper or tin, iron formed a sharper edge but was also more susceptible to corrosion. Initially used for weapons and armor, as productions costs dropped Iron was also adopted for civil uses (eg to hold bricks or a ships timber slats together, for wheel rims, axles, fittings and connectors).
*Concrete was the only building material developed during the classical era.
**Compressive strength is the maximum amount of pressure a load bearing feature can withstand before it breaks. Tensile strength is the maximum amount of stress a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking.
***An ax with a stone handle breaks because it has less tensile strength than wood.
Film can be viewed free on Kanopy.
https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/146678/146682
December 13, 2022
DeSantis Seeks Grand Jury Investigation of COVID Vaccines
Freida Fresaro
AP
MIAMI (AP) — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said Tuesday that he plans to petition the state’s Supreme Court to convene a grand jury to investigate “any and all wrongdoing” with respect to the COVID-19 vaccines.
The Republican governor, who is often mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2024, gave no specifics on what wrongdoing the panel would investigate, but suggested it would be in part aimed to jog loose more information from pharmaceutical companies about the vaccines and potential side effects.
He made the announcement following a roundtable with Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo and a panel of scientists and physicians.
“We’ll be able to get the data whether they want to give it or not,” DeSantis said. “In Florida, it is illegal to mislead and misrepresent, especially when you are talking about the efficacy of a drug.”
Vaccine studies funded by pharmaceutical companies that developed COVID-19 vaccines have been published in peer-reviewed journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, and government panels reviewed data on the safety and effectiveness of the shots before approving them for use.
The grand jury request, released later Tuesday, argues that pharmaceutical companies had a financial interest in creating a climate in which people believed that getting a coronavirus vaccine would ensure they couldn’t spread the virus to others.
[…]
Why the ‘Great Reset’ Is a Power Grab of Unprecedented Magnitude
“The Great Reset” is a new “social contract” that ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, and a “social credit” ID that will dictate every facet of your life.
Story at a glance:“The Great Reset” is a new “social contract” that ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, and a “social credit” ID that will dictate every facet of your life.While the COVID-19 pandemic is being used as a justification for The Great Reset movement, the agenda has nothing to do with health and everything to do with a long-term plan to monitor and control the world through digital surveillance and artificial intelligence.The Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution are rebranded terms for technocracy and the old “New World Order” melded with the transhumanist movement.Technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves around technology — in particular, artificial intelligence, digital surveillance and Big Data collection — and the digitization of industry and government, which in turn allows for the automation of social engineering and social rule, thereby doing away with the need for democratically elected leadership.While the real plan is to usher in a tech-driven dystopia free of democratic controls, they speak of this plan as a way to bring us back into harmony with nature.By now, you’ve probably heard world leaders speak of “The Great Reset,” “the Fourth Industrial Revolution” and the call to “Build Back Better” — which also is U.S. President Joe Biden’s plan to rebuild the middle-class slogan.
It was a concept that former President Bill Clinton talked about in 2005 as special envoy to a United Nations Special Convoy.
Another example among many is this speech by Matt Hancock, British Minister for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport, given during an All-Party Parliamentary Group meeting on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in 2017:
“One of the roles of Parliament is to cast ahead … and tackle the great challenges of our time … The nature of the technologies is materially different to what has come before.
“In the past, we’ve thought of consumption as a one-off and capital investment as additive.
“Yet put resources into the networks that now connect half the world, or into AI, and the effects are exponential … I’m delighted to speak alongside so many impressive colleagues who really understand this, and alongside Professor Klaus Schwab who literally ‘wrote the book’ on the 4th Industrial Revolution.
“Your work, bringing together as you do all the best minds on the planet, has informed what we are doing … Our Digital Strategy, embedded within the wider Industrial Strategy, sets out the seven pillars on which we can build our success.
“And inside that fits our 5G strategy, like a set of Russian Dolls. Our Strategy covers infrastructure, skills, rules and ethics of big data use, cyber security, supporting the tech sector, the digitization of industry, and digitization of government.”
What is The Great Reset?
But what do the terms “Great Reset,” “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and “Build Back Better” actually mean? What do they refer to?
In the Oct. 16, 2020, Corbett Report below, journalist James Corbett breaks down the new social contract planned for the world, otherwise known as “the great reset.”
While the current pandemic is being used as a justification for the movement, the agenda has nothing to do with health and everything to do with a long-term plan to monitor and control the world through technical surveillance.
In other words, the world will be reset to depend on digital technocracy run by self-appointed elitists.
It’s a power grab of unprecedented magnitude, and involves the restructuring of social classes to dismantle democracy, erase national borders and allow for the governing of communities from a distance by a group of unelected leaders.
What was in the past referred to as the “New World Order” is now known as “The Great Reset.”
This Great Reset not only ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records but even gives you a “social credit” ID that can run every facet of your life.
This isn’t a lofty conspiracy theory — it’s real. It’s happening now. And you need to know how to fight it before it’s too late.
Ultimately, it’s a technocratic agenda that seeks to integrate mankind into a technological surveillance apparatus overseen by powerful artificial intelligence.
Ironically, while the real plan is to usher in a tech-driven dystopia free of democratic controls, they speak of this plan as a way to bring us back into harmony with Nature.
[…]
In a nutshell, technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves around technology — in particular, artificial intelligence, digital surveillance and Big Data collection — and the digitization of industry (which includes banking) and government, which in turn allows for the automation of social engineering and social rule, thereby doing away with the need for elected government leaders.
Your guide to The Great Reset
According to the World Economic Forum, The Great Reset “will address the need for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future, and a new social contract centered on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.”
[…]
In other words, it’s technocracy, where we the people know nothing about the ruling elite while every aspect of our lives is surveilled, tracked and manipulated for their gain.
1. The Great Reset has NOTHING to do with a virus, the COVID-19 pandemic or anything else related to public health.
2. The Great Reset is a coordinated agenda that has been years in the making — The pandemic is simply being used as a convenient “cover” for an elitist, globalist agenda that has been planned for decades.
3. The Great Reset is NOT the end of globalization — On the contrary, it is globalization turbocharged.
[…]
4. This process is not meant to end — The end of the pandemic will not be the end of this totalitarian, digital enslavement agenda. The plan is not to “reset” the world back to some earlier state that will allow us all to start over with a cleaner environment and more equitable social structures. The plan is to circumvent democracy and shift global governance into the hands of the few.
[…]
Importantly, the pandemic is being used to destroy the local economies around the world, which will then allow the World Economic Forum to come in and “rescue” debt-ridden countries.
However, the price for this salvation is your personal freedom and liberty. The World Economic Forum and the central banks will, through their facilitated financial bailouts, be able to effectively control most countries in the world.
And, again, one of the aspects of the technocratic plan is to eliminate nation borders and nationalism in general.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
A related term to the Great Reset is “the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” This refers to the merging of digital, physical and biological systems. As noted by Schwab, “It will be like a tsunami and actually it’s not just a digital revolution. It’s digital; of course, physical. It is nanotechnology. But it’s also biological.
[…}
In short, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is nothing but a rebranding of technocracy, melded with the transhumanist movement.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/great-reset-power-grab-social-credit-cola/?
What’s Really Driving Netherlands’ Plan to Shut Down 3,000 Farms?
The Dutch government said it plans to purchase and forcibly shut down up to 3,000 farms it deems “peak polluters” in order to cut ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions, but critics question the government’s motives.
The Dutch government said it plans to purchase and forcibly shut down up to 3,000 farms it deems “peak polluters” in order to cut ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions in half by 2030, as required by EU environmental regulations.
Parliamentarian Johan Remkes, who has been negotiating with farmers for the government, said farmers have options — they can drastically innovate farming practices, shift to a different type of business, relocate or voluntarily stop farming.
Christianne van der Wal-Zeggelink, minister for nature and nitrogen policy, said the government will offer to purchase farms at more than 100% of their value, but if voluntary efforts fail, farmers will face forced buyouts.
The announcement follows months of farmer protests across the country against climate policies they say will force them to kill off livestock and will drive them out of business — policies that some argue also will drive up consumer food prices and contribute to the global hunger crisis.
During the protests, Dutch citizens expressed strong support for the farmers, adorning their homes and cars with upside-down Dutch flags and declaring their support in polling last summer.
The protests were accompanied by strong support for a new pro-farmers party.
Farmers are furious that the government is offering more lenient regulations to other top industrial polluters, which include the businesses Tata Steel, Schiphol airport, refineries owned by Shell, BP and Esso, Dow chemicals and industrial companies such as Olam Cacoa and Cargill Cacoa, according to The Guardian.
“For agricultural entrepreneurs, there will be a stopping scheme that will be as attractive as possible,” said van der Wal-Zeggelink in a series of parliamentary briefings, The Guardian reported. “For industrial peak polluters, we will get to work with a tailor-made approach and in tightening permits. After a year, we will see if this has achieved enough.”
Mark van den Oever, leader of a Dutch farmers’ political organization, Farmers Defence Force, said in response that if the government is serious that “600 fine farms” will be shut down, “then we will spring on the barricades.”
The Netherlands is one of the most intensely farmed countries in the EU. It has 1.1% of all of the farmland in the EU and produces 6% of the food. The agricultural sector emits an estimated 45% of greenhouse gases.
The new Dutch policy stems from a 2019 court ruling that the Netherlands had breached EU environmental standards, ordering it to cut nitrogen-compound pollution by 70-80%.
The Dutch government began implementing new rules on nitrogen activity on farmers that halted the expansion of dairy, pig and poultry operations.
In June, officials announced more plans to cut emissions. The Dutch Department for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality released a map showing which areas had to reduce emissions and by how much. In some areas, this meant 95% of farming activity must halt within a year.
Protesting farmers have been in talks with the government, but with no agreement.
Protecting nature? Or elite control of the food system?
Despite obvious impacts on farmer livelihood, a strong resistance movement and the argument that different policies could help Dutch farmers substantially reduce emissions, the government insists that buyouts must move forward to protect nature.
“Nature is under pressure, and we need to act swiftly to restore it,” Lisanne de Roos, a press officer for the minister for nature and nitrogen policy, told NBC News, echoing Remkes’ remarks that nature must be central to farmer negotiations.
Mainstream media has portrayed farmers as anti-environmentalists and conspiracy theorists. But farmers say the new policies are not simply about protecting nature.
[…]
Global bodies and programs, such as the World Bank’s Climate-Smart Agriculture and Protected Areas initiative, the European Commission and NGOs, like the World Wide Fund For Nature, that support this “agri-transition” are implementing a comprehensive policy targeting Dutch farmers, and farmers across the world, using “biodiversity” and “climate” protection as a pretext for taking land as part of a larger project to re-make agriculture, according to a recent report by The Grayzone.
The Sri Lankan government conducted a similar experiment earlier this year, eliminating nitrogen-based fertilizer, which led to a famine that toppled the government. The Irish government also warned farmers that they must cut emissions or face consequences.
Agricultural researcher, permaculturalist and author Christian Westbrook — also known as the “Ice Age Farmer” — explained in an episode of “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast,” how the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have long pushed the idea of a so-called Green Revolution.
Westbrook warned that narratives crafted to appeal to “green consumers” disguise a more nefarious intent on the part of the global elite who, in fact, are in the process of launching a “hostile takeover” of the global food system.
The global elites have used their influence over multilateral institutions to propose a series of top-down technocratic transformations of the global food system that will consolidate their control over global agriculture and limit farmer autonomy in the name of protecting the planet from environmental and climate destruction.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) — a neo-liberal public-private partnership that seeks to “define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda” — has proposed that farmers embrace “climate-smart” methods to completely transform agriculture to “net-zero, nature positive food systems” by 2030.
Sieta van Keimpema, spokesperson for the Farmers Defence Force, discussed the links between the WEF and Dutch politicians with The Grayzone:“They know that what they are fighting is a very strong lobby of multinationals who really want to control food.”
[…]
What will the seized land be used for?
Commenting on the farm expropriation, regenerative farmer Will Harris told The Defender:
“I’ve had great concerns for a long time about Bill Gates and other technocrats taking over land not knowing what to do with it [for ecological management], governments taking over land not knowing what to do with it, the Chinese government buying up land in this country.
“There are very few people left who actually know how to manage land who know how to keep natural cycles.”
Dutch activist Will Engel argued that land currently occupied by farms is strategically important to industry and housing and that the “nitrogen crisis” is being used to implement policies that will make a total reorganization of the Dutch landscape possible, the OffGuardian reported.
A Dutch environmental report indicates that the land will be used for housing for migrants and for high-income people who want to live closer to nature, The Grayzone reported.
Another possible plan proposes to build a new metropolis that encompasses parts of Holland, Germany and Belgium called the “Tristate-City,” to create unified green urban areas across Europe, “an organically green network metropol where urban and rural space remain in balance.”
Transitioning to regenerative farming ‘not quick and easy’ but it can be done
People’s movements and civil society groups across the world have argued that industrial farming generates severe environmental impacts, but the U.N.-WEF vision of “precision agriculture,” genetic engineering, fewer farmers and farms and lab-made synthetic food — all of which consolidate corporate control over food and agriculture — should not be the alternative.
Although industrial agriculture uses substantial resources, small farmers feed most of the world.
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dutch-government-farms-shutdown/
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
