Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 474

Time to Boycott: Companies Discriminating Against the Unvaccinated

Aletho News

Time to boycott

Almost a year ago, I wrote about the  against their employees just because they were unvaccinated against Covid-19. I suggested boycotting those companies until they changed their policies.

Hopefully some of this pressure made these companies see sense, as a lot of these discriminatory policies have now been removed.

However, a year on and some companies have found a loop hole, making them appear less discriminatory. Now, they can’t be seen to be discriminating against their unvaccinated employees because they will only employ vaccinated individuals in the first place!

So it’s time to name and shame again. If you know of any companies that are still treating their unvaccinated employees differently or only employing vaccinated individuals, then add their names in the comments sections below (please add a link to their policy for verification).

Below is a list of companies, that I have compiled, that require vaccination for employment. I have only included large companies but there are thousands of examples of small companies that also require vaccination. These are for jobs including administrators, care home workers, chefs, dentists, plumbers, nurses, software engineers and support workers to name but a few.

I find it amusing how many of these companies have equal opportunities sections in their job listing postings. Equal opportunities for anyone except the unvaccinated!

And if anyone from any of these companies reads this post, I would highly recommend that you remove your policies for two reasons. Firstly for discriminatory reasons connected to any future employment law issues and secondly, you don’t want to have pushed vaccination on employees, just in case it turns out that the vaccines weren’t as safe and effective as you thought.

I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been turned down from a job or interview if they are unvaccinated.

A selection of companies requiring or encouraging Covid-19 vaccination for employment.

Accenture (Accenture requires all new employees to be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 as a condition of employment);Amazon (Workers in New York City who perform in-person work or interact with the public in the course of business must show proof they have been fully vaccinated against COVID or request and receive approval for a reasonable accommodation, including medical or religious accommodation);American Red Cross (As a condition of employment with American Red Cross, you are required to provide proof that you are fully vaccinated for COVID 19 or qualify for an exemption, except in states where it is prohibited by law);AstraZeneca (AstraZeneca requires all US employees to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 but will consider requests for reasonable accommodations as required by applicable law);Carnival UK (To keep everyone on board fit and well, colleagues who visit or work on our ships must be fully vaccinated, including boosters);CBS Studios (Must be fully vaccinated to work on-site. (To be considered fully vaccinated: 2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or 2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine);Chainalysis (All employees are required to have or obtain a COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment at Chainalysis, unless an exemption has been approved. All employees shall be required to report their vaccine status);Citi (Citi requires that all successful applicants for positions located in the United States or Puerto Rico be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of employment and provide proof of such vaccination prior to commencement of employment);Coca-Cola ( all new employees must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and provide Coke Canada with proof of vaccination);Coles (As part of that commitment, you will need to be vaccinated against COVID-19 before joining the team at Coles, unless you’re medically exempt);Fitch Learning (part of Fitch Group) (UNITED STATES ONLY: As part of its continued efforts to maintain a safe workplace for employees, Fitch requires that all employees who receive a written offer of employment on or after October 4, 2021 be fully vaccinated (as defined by the CDC) against the coronavirus by the first day of employment as a condition of employment, to the extent permitted by applicable law);Jefferies Group LLC (It is Jefferies’ policy that all employees and visitors be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in order to enter any Jefferies office or participate in any Jefferies or client event in person. Should an offer of employment be made, your acceptance of that offer means that you will comply with this policy);Levi Strauss (LS&CO requires proof of being fully vaccinated for COVID-19 as a condition of commencing employment, except in those jurisdictions where prohibited by law);Marella Cruises (Please note that all applicants must be fully vaccinated against Covid-19).

[…]

NSF International (NSF requires all employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of employment, with exceptions only as required by law);OmniAb (New hires based in the US will be required to demonstrate that they have been fully vaccinated and boosted for COVID-19 or qualify for a medical or religious exemption or accommodation to this vaccination requirement);Overseas Adventure Travel (All trip leaders are required to be double vaccinated and boosted (as are all of our passengers));Paypal (Depending on location, this might include a Covid-19 vaccination requirement for any employee whose role requires them to work onsite);Qantas Airways ( It is the intention of the Qantas Group to require employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and this is being explored in all our international locations);Universal Music Group (All UMG employees are currently required to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or provide proof of a negative PCR or Antigen test before entering any Company offices unless they have been approved for an exemption or unless prohibited by applicable law);Visier (As part of this commitment, we require all employees to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 or qualify for an exemption);ZE UK (Accordingly, following with provincial and federal vaccination’s approach, we require that all of our employees to be fully vaccinated and provide their proof of vaccination or substantiated grounds for exemption);

[…]

Via

False Match Leads to Wrongful Arrest, Prompting Calls to Ban Facial Recognition Technology

By Jessica Corbett

Common Dreams

Fight for the Future, a digital rights group, called for an “all-out ban” on facial recognition technology in response to the arrest of a man wrongfully accused of theft and jailed for a week by Louisiana authorities whose use of the technology mistakenly identified the man.

Instead of enjoying a late Thanksgiving meal with his mother in Georgia, Randal Reid spent nearly a week in jail in November after he was falsely identified as a luxury purse thief by Louisiana authorities using facial recognition technology.

That’s according to Monday reporting by NOLA.com, which caught the attention of Fight for the Future, a digital rights group that has long advocated against law enforcement and private entities using such technology, partly because of its shortcomings and the risk of outcomes like this.

“So much wrong here,” Fight for the Future said Tuesday, sharing the story on Twitter.

The group highlighted that many cops can use facial recognition systems without publicly disclosing it, and anyone’s “life can be upended because of a machine’s mistake.”

 

Reid — a 28-year-old Black man misidentified as one of three people who allegedly stole over $10,000 in Chanel and Louis Vuitton purses from a pair of shops via bogus credit card purchases — was pulled over by local police in Georgia’s Dekalb County on Nov. 25, while he was driving on Interstate 20 to meet up with his mother, NOLA.com reported.

“They told me I had a warrant out of Jefferson Parish. I said, ‘What is Jefferson Parish?,’” Reid recalled. “I have never been to Louisiana a day in my life. Then they told me it was for theft. So not only have I not been to Louisiana, I also don’t steal.”

Reid wasn’t released from the Dekalb County jail until Dec. 1. While behind bars, he worried about losing his job as a transportation analyst and being convicted of felonies that he did not commit.

“Not eating, not sleeping. I’m thinking about these charges. Not doing anything because I don’t know what’s really going on the whole time,” he said. “They didn’t even try to make the right ID.”

Tommy Calogero, Reid’s lawyer, told NOLA.com that Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office (JPSO) detectives “tacitly” admitted the misidentification and rescinded a July warrant.

The news outlet noted that court records show a Baton Rouge Police Department detective “adopted JPSO’s identification of Reid to secure an arrest warrant” for one of the thefts.

According to the report:

“Sheriff Joe Lopinto’s office did not respond to several requests for information on Reid’s arrest and release, the agency’s use of facial recognition, or any safeguards around it.

“That office also denied a formal request for the July 18 arrest warrant for Reid and copies of policies or purchases related to facial recognition, citing an ongoing investigation.”

Baton Rouge police also did not respond to questions about its warrant for Reid’s arrest. The warrant, signed by 19th Judicial District Judge Eboni Rose, does not say how Lopinto’s office identified Reid.

As Fight for the Future summarized:

“Police blindly trusted a facial recognition scan to arrest a man in Georgia. He was wrongly imprisoned for a WEEK. Now (surprise, surprise) the cops are stonewalling the press about their failure.”

Experts from the ACLU of Louisiana and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) shared concerns with NOLA.com about police use of the technology — which, as research has shown, more frequently misidentifies people of color.

In response to reporting on Reid’s experience, the national ACLU on Tuesday stressed the flaws of facial recognition tools and asserted that “law enforcement must drop this dangerous technology — we shouldn’t have to worry about being falsely arrested because an algorithm gets it wrong.

So much wrong here. Police blindly trusted a facial recognition scan to arrest a man in Georgia. He was wrongly imprisoned for a WEEK. Now (surprise, surprise) the cops are stonewalling the press about their failure https://t.co/gSda58u0Mo

— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@fightfortheftr) January 3, 2023

The national ACLU has previously called on policymakers to end law enforcement use of facial recognition technology across the United States — including after the January 2020 wrongful arrest of Robert Williams, a Black man in Michigan misidentified as a shoplifting suspect.

“My daughters can’t unsee me being handcuffed and put into a police car. But they can see me use this experience to bring some good into the world,” Williams wrote in a June 2020 opinion piece.

Williams continued:

“I keep thinking about how lucky I was to have spent only one night in jail — as traumatizing as it was. Many Black people won’t be so lucky. My family and I don’t want to live with that fear. I don’t want anyone to live with that fear.”

Even before Williams’ arrest, Fight for the Future and partners groups launched a “Ban Facial Recognition” campaign, which has tracked restrictions and known uses of the technology as well as enabled constituents to pressure lawmakers to ban it.

Despite some progress in restricting or banning law enforcement’s use of such tools at the local and state levels, the United States still lacks federal law on the topic.

“Like nuclear or biological weapons, facial recognition poses a threat to human society and basic liberty that far outweighs any potential benefits,” the campaign’s website argues.

The campaign’s website continues:

“Silicon Valley lobbyists are disingenuously calling for light ‘regulation’ of facial recognition so they can continue to profit by rapidly spreading this surveillance dragnet. They’re trying to avoid the real debate: whether technology this dangerous should even exist.”

According to the campaign, “Industry-friendly and government-friendly oversight will not fix the dangers inherent in law enforcement’s use of facial recognition: We need an all-out ban.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/false-match-wrongful-arrest-facial-recognition-cd/

WHO’s Cancer Research Agency to Assess 5G Health Risks — But Not Until 2025

By  Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer will participate in a project to assess the health risks of exposure to 5G technologies, but critics accused the agency of ignoring already existing evidence and suggested the results could be tainted by industry partners.

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) on Monday announced it will participate in a new project that includes assessing the health risks of exposure to 5G technologies.

According to IARC, the project will “develop tools and instrumentation for reliable evaluation of exposure, conduct experimental studies (in vitro, animal, and human studies) on potential cancer risks, and develop effective health risk communication materials for stakeholders.”

The project — Scientific-Based Exposure and Risk Assessment of Radiofrequency and Millimetre-Wave Systems (SEAWave) — aims to identify differences in exposure patterns between 5G and earlier mobile technologies, such as 2G-4G.

Horizon Europe and SERI (Switzerland) are co-funding the project, which will culminate with a risk assessment of 5G, set to be released in 2025.

Experts on the health risks of exposure to 5G technologies told The Defender that risk assessments should have been conducted years ago.

“A risk assessment should have been performed before the 5G rollout — and not years after it started,” Mona Nilsson, managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, said.

Instead, Nilsson said, “entire populations” have for several years been “effectively turned into 5G lab rats in a dangerous experiment.”

Eileen O’Connor, co-founder and director of the EM Radiation Research Trust in the U.K. and board member of the International EMF Alliance, agreed.

“Why isn’t IARC calling for the precautionary principle as a matter of urgency rather than agreeing to an assessment on 5G?” O’Connor asked. “There is enough evidence and reason for concern regarding public health associated with 2G, 3G and 4G,” she said.

According to O’Connor, “The whole population will be exposed to untested and unregulated [electromagnetic] radiation, which they will absorb into their bodies and without any public agreement. Too many reports and reviews delay and deny the precautionary approach due to economic interests.”

“It’s time for action,” said O’Connor, adding that she is “deeply concerned” about the role “that special interests and industry lobbying are playing.”

“It’s time to demand accountability for the imposition of this technology in every corner of our lives, and time to demand accountability on the part of the individuals who are voting to put this technology in place without a single safety test having been conducted for 5G, as established by U.S. Senator Blumenthal during congressional hearings on 5G,” she said.

Why is ‘risk communication’ last on SEAWave agenda?

According to the IARC, the agency plans to “play a critical role in the later stages of the project by coordinating a comprehensive evaluation of the project’s experimental studies and a review of the latest literature on millimeter-wave frequencies and health effects” — effectively making it the main arbiter for which scientific studies are considered when determining whether there is scientific evidence of health risks posed by 5G.

According to its website, the SEAWave project consists of completing 11 interlinked smaller projects — called “work packages” — initiated at its kick-off meeting and co-design workshop.

SEAWave plans to complete eight work packages, including studies focusing on types of 5G exposure and health outcomes, and then assess the risk of 5G on human health as its ninth work package.

After that, the project will address how to communicate risk to the public.

Scientists who invoke the precautionary principle said risk communication regarding 5G and wireless technologies — such as the use of wireless headphones like Apple’s popular AirPods — should be proactive, not retroactive.

Health risks associated with 5G already known, critics say

Nilsson — who has authored two books on the health risks associated with wireless radiation and co-authored an academic publication titled “International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2020 Guidelines on Radiofrequency Radiation” — said the IARC press release “gives the impression that we do not already know that there is massive scientific evidence of harmful effects from previous generations of telecommunication technology (2G, 3G WiFi).”

[…]

It has been more than a decade, O’Connor explained, since members of the IARC classified the entire RF-EMF spectrum as a “2B Possible Human Carcinogen.” The vote was “nearly unanimous: 29 to 1,” she added.

Since then, O’Connor said, more human studies and toxicology studies in animals, which demonstrated clear evidence of tumors, have added to the evidence of increased cancer risks.

In 2018, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) — part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — determined in a $30 million study that there was “clear evidence” that electromagnetic radiation is associated with cancer and DNA damage.

“The $30 million U.S. National Toxicology Program RF [radio frequency] studies and the Italian Ramazzini Institute’s 10-year research project both found clear evidence of malignant tumors,” she said.

“Two different institutes,” O’Connor emphasized, “with laboratories in different countries, totally independent of each other and both producing parallel consistent findings, reinforces the validity of these groundbreaking animal studies.”

[…]

O’Connor noted that a worldwide list of all peer-reviewed scientific studies, through May 2020, on human health around mobile phone base stations and cell towers, compiled by Karl Muller and the EM-Radiation Research Trust, showed consistent findings of health problems. “Out of 33 studies, 32 (or 97%) reported health problems,” she said.

The only study that did not find health problems was a “very poor study of cancer in Bavaria that by its own admission did not have sufficient controls,” she said.

Just last year, 250 scientists signed a petition to the United Nations that took aim at both non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs), which are used by AirPods and other Bluetooth devices, and cellphones and Wi-Fi, which emit RF radiation.

[…]

Nilsson also noted that IARC’s press release included the “misleading claim” that many exposure parameters of 5G are similar to those of 2G-4G. “But we know that 5G has already led to a massive exposure increase compared to previous generations according to the measurements performed so far during the 5G rollout,” she said.

“The fact that 5G massively increases radiation exposure is also why the telecom sector has lobbied various governments — such as Brussels, Switzerland and Italy — to relax their radiation limits, because they will not be able to roll out 5G as planned otherwise.”

Now years into the 5G rollout, she said, exposure levels “exceed 1 million microwatts per square meter in peak values — which is far above what is known to cause harmful effects in terms of sleep disturbances, headache, dizziness, tinnitus, heart arrhythmia, and fatigue.”

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-health-risks-world-health-organization/

 

 

Here’s the COVID Vaccine Injury Report CDC Was Forced to Release

By Josh Guetzkow, Ph.D.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System safety signal analysis for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events among U.S. adults.

SummaryCenters for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) safety signal analysis based on reports from Dec. 14, 2020 – July 29, 2022, for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events (AEs) among U.S. adults.There were 770 different types of adverse events that showed safety signals in ages 18+, of which more than 500 (or 2/3) had a larger safety signal than myocarditis/pericarditis.The CDC analysis shows that the number of serious adverse events reported in less than two years for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is 5.5 times greater than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the U.S. since 2009 (~73,000 vs. ~13,000).Twice as many mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%). This meets the CDC definition of a safety signal.There are 96 safety signals for 12-17 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, high blood pressure and heart rate, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetencies, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmias, thromboses, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest pain, increased troponin levels, being in intensive care and having anticoagulant therapy.There are 66 safety signals for 5-11 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction and cardiac valve incompetencies, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease, menstrual irregularities, vitiligo and vaccine breakthrough infection.The safety signals cannot be dismissed as due to “stimulated,” exaggerated, fraudulent or otherwise artificially inflated reporting, nor can they be dismissed due to the huge number of COVID-19 vaccines administered.

There are several reasons why, but the simplest one is this: the safety signal analysis does not depend on the number of reports, but whether or not some AEs are reported at a higher rate for these vaccines than for other non-COVID vaccines. Other reasons are discussed in the full post below.

In August 2022, the CDC told The Epoch Times that the results of their safety signal analysis “were generally consistent with EB [Empirical Bayesian] data mining [conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)], revealing no additional unexpected safety signals.”

So either the FDA’s data mining was consistent with the CDC’s method — meaning they “generally” found the same large number of highly alarming safety signals — or the signals they did find were expected. Or they were lying. We may never know because the FDA has refused to release their data mining results.

Introduction

Finally! Zachary Stieber at The Epoch Times managed to get the CDC to release the results of its VAERS safety signal monitoring for COVID-19 vaccines, and they paint a very alarming picture.

The analyses cover VAERS reports for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from the period from the vaccine rollout on Dec. 14, 2020, through to the end of July 2022.

The CDC admitted to only having started its safety signal analysis on March 25, 2022 (coincidentally three days after a lawyer at Children’s Health Defense wrote to them reminding them about our Freedom of Information Act [FOIA] request for it).

Like me, you might be wondering why the CDC waited more than 15 months before doing its first safety signal analysis of VAERS, despite having said in a document posted to its website that it would begin in early 2021 — especially since VAERS is touted as our early warning vaccine safety system.

You might also wonder how they could insist all the while that the COVID-19 vaccines are being subjected to the most rigorous safety monitoring the world has ever known.

I’ll come back to that later. First I’m going to give a little background information on the analysis they did (which you can skip if you’re up to speed) and then describe what they found.

Background on safety signal analysis

Back in June 2022, the CDC replied to a FOIA request for the safety signal monitoring of the VAERS — the one it had said it was going to do weekly beginning in early 2021.

Their response was: we never did it. Then a little later they said they had been doing it from early on.

But by August 2022, they had finally gotten their story straight, saying that they actually did do it, but only from March 25, 2022, through the end of July. You can get up to speed on that here.

The analysis they were supposed to do uses what’s called proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). This is a type of disproportionality analysis commonly used in pharmacovigilance (meaning the monitoring of adverse events after drugs/vaccines go to market).

The basic idea of disproportionality analysis is to take a new drug and compare it to one or more existing drugs generally considered safe.

We look for disproportionality in the number of adverse events (AEs) reported for a specific AE out of the total number of AEs reported (since we generally don’t know how many people take a given drug).

We then compare to existing drugs considered safe to see if there is a higher proportion of particular adverse events reported for the new drug compared to existing ones. (In this case, they are looking at vaccines, but they still use PRR even though they generally have a much better sense of how many vaccines were administered.)

[…]

So what did the CDC actually do?

The Epoch Times obtained 3 weeks of safety signal analyses from the CDC for VAERS data updated on July 15, 2022 and 29, 2022. Here I will focus on the last one since there is very little difference between them and it is more complete.

The safety signal analysis compares adverse events reported to VAERS for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through July 29, 2022, to reports for all non-COVID vaccines from Jan. 1, 2009, through July 29, 2022.

[…]

Recall that a serious report is one that involves death, a life-threatening event, new or prolonged hospitalization, disability or permanent damage, or a congenital anomaly. I will focus on the reports for all AE’s.This isn’t that surprising since both vaccines are very similar and so should present relatively similar adverse events when compared to each other, and any differences are likely not large enough to be picked up by a PRR analysis.

[…]

What safety signals did the CDC find?

[…]

There are 772 AEs that appear on the list. Of these, 770 are marked in yellow and have PRR and Chi-square values that qualify them as safety signals. Some of these are new COVID-19-related codes, and we would expect those to trigger a signal since they didn’t exist in prior years to be reported by other vaccines.

[…]

 

You can peruse the adverse events using the Excel tables provided by the CDC, which were posted by The Epoch Times and Children’s Health Defense at the links at the top of this post.

[…]

What about the children?

If there is anything that looks remotely like a bright spot in all of this is that the list of safety signals for 12-17 and 5-11 year-olds is much shorter than for 18+.

There are 96 AEs that qualify as a safety signal for the 12-17 group and 67 for the 5-11. When we take out the new COVID-19-era AEs, there are 92 safety signals for 12-17 year-olds and 65 for 5-11 year-olds. Here are the most alarming ones:

[…]

Comparisons to myocarditis and pericarditis

We are told that the existence of a safety signal doesn’t necessarily mean the AE is caused by the vaccine and I accept that premise. But the current practice seems to be to ignore safety signals, dismiss them as noise without any evidence and stall any investigation into them as long as possible.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-vaers-covid-vaccines-serious-injuries/

 

Study: Carcinogenic Chemicals in Green Cleaning Products

Chemical Free Life

In recent years, many savvy consumers have made the switch from commercial home cleaning products (known to contain toxic and even carcinogenic chemicals) to “green” cleaning products in the belief that so-called green products (as in good for you, your pets and the environment) are a healthier, smarter choice. But researchers investigating this belief have now uncovered a disturbing reality: While the majority of commercial home cleaning products tested contain toxic chemicals, at least a quarter of the “green” products contained toxins, including carcinogenic chemicals, as well.

.Study overview

The study was a part of the Lifting Up Communities by Intervening with Research (LUCIR) Study”. Scientists measured air concentrations of potentially hazardous volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs, respectively) released from both traditional and green cleaning products in both a home setting and a controlled laboratory setting.

The study focused on “chemicals that might increase women’s risk of breast cancer, including possible carcinogens, reproductive/developmental toxicants, or endocrine disruptors.”

Researchers found a correlation between the use of both conventional and “green” cleaning products and higher concentrations of chemical toxins emitted into the air. Seventy-five percent of the highest VOC emissions were emitted by conventional cleaning products, but researchers also identified VOC emissions of concern from green products.

The research team found that air concentrations of certain VOCs and SVOCs, like chloroform and carbon tetrachloride, were higher in the breathing zones of participants in a home setting. In the laboratory chamber, increases in VOC emissions were also present, with the majority (75%) associated with conventional products while only 25% were associated with “green” products.

Additionally, the researchers uncovered elevated levels of some chemicals, specifically fragrance chemicals (possible endocrine disruptors), associated with use of some “green” cleaning products.–

Solution

There is still no official “green” standard or legal parameters for what may or may not be contained in products sold as “green”.  This leaves consumers on their own to know if the products they purchase contain toxic chemicals–including chemicals known to be carcinogenic.  The statistical odds for exposure to toxic chemicals are lower for green cleaners than commercial, mainstream products. However, the best solution is to make your own cleaning products.  If you are unable to do that, read the ingredients labels on the green products and avoid those that list “fragrances”.

For more recipes for DIY cleaning products and personal care products, go to our Chemical Watch Blog, scroll to the bottom of any blog post and enter “DIY” or “Solutions” in the Search box at the bottom of the post. You can also contact us via our secure email system here and we will do a search for you of our internal database.

[…]

Via https://chemical-free-life.org/2023/01/05/carcinogenic-chemicals-in-green-cleaning-products-study/

Tumors Sprouting Overnight: New COVID Jab Horror Stories

Dr Joseph Mercola

Story at-a-glanceCancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is now one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancyThe leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease and cancer, both of which are potential side effects of the COVID jabsDr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George’s University of London, warns that COVID boosters may be causing aggressive metastatic cancersResearch shows SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that helps your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancerThe COVID jab is less effective in lymphoma patients. Emory University researchers found only 68% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia developed neutralizing antibodies after the second dose, compared to 100% of healthy controls

Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy.

In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was nearly 78.8 years.1 By the end of 2021, life expectancy had dropped to 76.42 — a loss of nearly three years, which is an astounding decline. The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease, cancer and COVID-19, all three of which were higher in 2021 than in 2020,3 and both heart disease and cancer are potential side effects of the COVID jabs.

COVID Boosters Are Triggering Metastatic Cancer

November 26, 2022, The Daily Sceptic published a letter4,5 to the editor of The BMJ, written by Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George’s University of London, warning that COVID boosters may be causing aggressive metastatic cancers.

[…]

New Norm: Explosive Cancer Relapses

In a December 19, 2022, article7 in Conservative Woman, Dalgleish continues discussing the phenomenon of rapidly spreading cancers in patients who were in stable remission for years before receiving their COVID boosters. He notes that after his letter to The BMJ was published, several oncologists have contacted him to say they’re seeing the same thing in their own practices.

[…]A Change of Heart and Mind

Interestingly, in mid-2021, the Daily Mail published an article in which Dalgleish encouraged people to get the COVID shot, especially younger individuals.9 Dalgleish explains that, at the time, there was an “overwhelming push by the government and the medical community … that this would be in everyone’s best interest.”

So, he caved to the narrative, even though he had concerns from the start. Now, however, the environment has changed and there’s really no need for these experimental shots anymore.

His concerns further grew when his son developed myocarditis “after having a jab he did not want but that he needed for work and travel purposes.” A friend of his son, who was in his early 30s, suffered a stroke after his jab, and a relative of a close colleague died from a heart attack at the age of 34 after hers.

[…]

Authorities Have Willfully Ignored All Warning Signals

Dalgleish says his team’s findings were eventually circulated among cabinet members and various medical committees, but everyone ignored them. As a result, many have been placed at unnecessary risk for serious injury and/or death.

As Dalgleish points out, young hearts over-express the ACE receptor that the virus was engineered to bind to. This binding with the ACE2 receptor is what “sets off the inflammatory response, which leads to myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke and deaths,” Dalgleish says.

This could explain the dramatic increase observed in deaths of young athletes who were jabbed: They simply have more ACE2 receptors that bind to the spike proteins created by the jab.

[…]

More Evidence COVID Jab Causes Cancer

Back in August 2022, The Exposé13 highlighted scientific evidence showing the COVID jabs can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast, and that “a monumental cover-up is taking place to suppress the consequences … on women’s health.”

Research shows SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cells that help your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer.

The research in question was that of Jiang and Mei, who published a peer-reviewed article showing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cells that play an important role in your immune system. Lymphocytes help your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer.

[…]

A Not so Rare Cancer Case

At the end of September 2022, The Atlantic18 featured the story of Belgian immunologist Michel Goldman, 67, who in the spring of 2021 got his first and second COVID shot. In the fall that year, he was diagnosed with lymphoma, cancer of the immune system.

Mere weeks after his body scan and diagnosis, he got his first booster, thinking he needed it since he’d soon become immunocompromised by the chemotherapy. But the booster caused a rapid decline in his health.

Another body scan at the end of September 2021, just three weeks after his first scan, revealed “a brand-new barrage of cancer lesions — so many spots that it looked like someone had set off fireworks inside Michel’s body.”

[…]

T Cells Gone Berserk

Goldman, who was an early champion of the mRNA COVID shots, now “suspected that he was their unlucky victim,” Khamsi writes.21 He decided to go public about his cancer despite fears “anti-vaxxers” would use it to argue against the COVID jab. His concern for people who had the same type of cancer he had won out.

There are approximately 30 different subtypes of lymphoma. The kind Goldman had — angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma — attacks follicular helper T cells, which play a crucial role in your body’s immune response to invading pathogens.

Helper T cells serve as a messenger between dendritic cells, which identify the pathogen, and B cells that make the appropriate antibodies. The mRNA COVID shots “are especially effective at generating that message, and spurring its passage through the helper T cells,” Khamsi writes.

This activation of helper T cells is part of what makes the COVID jabs work. But Goldman began to suspect that revving up those helper T cells might in some cases cause them to go berserk, resulting in tumors, or worsening of already existing ones.

Other Case Reports

[…]

In August 2022, Frontiers in Medicine published a case report23 describing “rapid progression of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma” following the COVID jab. The 80-year-old Japanese woman featured in the report developed a noticeable tumor the very next day after her first shot.

[…]

Turbo-Charged Cancers Are Becoming More PrevalentVideo Link

Data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED)26 — historically one of the most well-kept and most heavily-relied upon medical databases in the world — showed that, compared to the previous five-year averages, cancer among Department of Defense (DOD) personnel in 2021 skyrocketed.

Overall, cancers tripled among servicemen and their family members after the rollout of the COVID shots. Breast cancer went up 487%. Exploding cancer rates are also seen elsewhere. One of the first to warn that the shots might cause cancer was Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist who runs his own pathology lab.

He suspects the shots accelerate already existing cancers by way of immune dysregulation.27 He noticed that cancers that were previously well-controlled would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death once they got the COVID jab.

Swedish pathologist, researcher and senior physician at Lund’s University, Dr. Ute Kruger, has also observed an explosion in rapidly advancing cancers in the wake of the COVID shots.

[…]

These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID restrictions, as those days are long gone. Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.

Disturbingly, as detailed in “How Cancer Deaths From the COVID Jabs Are Being Hidden,” analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data suggests the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering out and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal. The signal is being hidden by swapping the underlying cause of death with main cause of death.

[…]

Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/01/05/covid-boosters-trigger-metastasis/

One Nation Under Blackmail: The Phenomenon of Jeffrey Epstein

One Nation Under Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime that gave rise to Jeffrey Epstein

By Whitney Webb

TrineDay 2022

Book Review

Naming names, Webb lays down a thorough background of the murky marriage between US intelligence and organized crime that gave rise to Jeffrey Epstein. Her style is reminiscent of the shadow government research carried out by the late Mae Brussell and John Judge in the 1980s. Many of the intelligence and organized crime figures the book introduces will already be familiar to followers of Brussell’s and Judge’s work, as well as the efforts of Santa Barbara’s Prevailing Winds Research. The latter took over public dissemination of the Christic Institute archives after the IRS stripped the latter of their non-profit charitable status.*

Book 1 is both an encyclopedia and a Who’s Who of US intelligence figures and political officials involved in organized crime, illegal weapons sales,financial fraud, money laundering, pedophilia and sexual blackmail.

Chap 1 The Underworld – details the close collaboration between US intelligence and organized crime initiated by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) on the pretext of enlisting the Mafia-controlled dock workers union against potential German sabotage of US shipping. As the OSS evolved into the CIA, it continued the collaboration, relying heavily on organized crime figures for covert assassinations, gun running, financial fraud, money laundering and sexual trafficking and blackmail. Like its successor the CIA, the OSS was largely a fraternal organization of elite Wall Street families, with the exception of the Rockefeller family – who formed their own intelligence networks.

Chap 2 Booze and Blackmail – mainly concerns the Jewish-Canadian Bronfman family (founders of Seagram’s liquor distillery)** and their involvement in bootlegging during Canadian and US prohibition and eventually prostitution rings and sexual blackmail.

Chap 3 Organized Crime and the State of Israel – concerns the role of US organized crime figures in the early formation of the state of Israel, via their Illegal arms trafficking to the Jewish terrorist organization Haganah.

Chap 4 Roy Cohn’s Favor Bank – provides a biographical sketch of Trump’s mentor Roy Cohn, best known for his role as chef council during the 1954 Army McCarthy hearings. Webb emphasizes Cohn’s close collaboration with late FBI director J Edgar Hoover, both in sexual black male and the sex-blackmail parties they had with other closeted gay men at the Plaza Hotel in the fifties and sixties. She also explores Cohn’s involvement in the 1980’s Savings and Loan Crisis (the failure of more than 1,000 US savings and loan institutions thanks to their looting by intelligence-linked organized crime figures, in part to finance CIA-backed Contras in Nicaragua). This chapter also elaborates sexual blackmail crime boss Meyer Lanksy and OSS director Bill Donovan subjected him to, based on photos of him performing oral sex on assistant FBI director Clive Tolson. Webb attributes Hoover’s refusal to investigate or prosecute organized crime rackets to his fear of being exposed.

Chap 5 Shades of Gray – profiles the shadowy intelligence figure and specialist in CIA homosexual blackmail Robert Keith Gray, who was also linked to the Franklin Scandal, a nationwide pedophile ring exposed in 1988. This chapter also covers the CIA infiltration of the AFL-CIO and organized labor, unsuccessful efforts to subject John Kennedy to sexual blackmail, Operation CHAOS (the largest illegal domestic CIA spying operation – on civil rights and anti-war activists – in US history), and Watergate. For me the most interesting section explores the motivation of the Watergate burglaries (which have never been explained). Webb speculates the burglars were after the confidential records of a call-girl service run out of the Democratic National Committee.

Chap 6 A Private CIA – concerns a private intelligence operation formed by former CIA operative Ted Shackley after reforms initiated by Congress and Jimmy Carter ended the most egregious criminal activities of the CIA and their organized crime cronies. The intent was for Shackley’s private CIA to take over once the Republicans regained the presidency. This chapter also discusses the October Surprise.***

Chap 7 A Killer Enterprise – concerns the cast of characters involved in the CIA-linked Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), initially founded to bolster Saudi development through cheap Pakistani labor. At its height, BCCI was engaged in financial fraud, money laundering, weapons trafficking, drug trafficking and adult and child sex trafficking. Before its collapse in 1991, the bank enabled covert funding of the CIA-back Mujahideen in Afghanistan (in which Jeffrey Epstein played a major role) and Iran Contra. Under Iran Contra, US intelligence used funds from illegal weapon sales to Iran to illegal finance gun running to CIA-backed Contras (after Congress outlawed continued US support) attempting to overthrow Nicaragua’s Sandinista government. The planes used to secretly fly weapons to the Contras in Honduras returned with cocaine shipments destined for major US cities. 

Chap 8 Clinton Contra – concerns Bill Clinton’s role as governor in suppressing investigation into the CIA/Contra cocaine flights into the Mena Airport in Arkansas. It also details the involvement of Hillary Clinton’s Rose Law firm into questionable financial dealings with the companies supplying weapons and airplane parts for the planes involved in the weapons/cocaine exchange.

Chap 9 High Tech Treason – details the involvement of late British publisher and spy Robert Maxwell (father of Ghislane Maxwell) in British, Israeli and Soviet intelligence and his role in selling bugged PROMIS software to dictators in Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America. The software’s ability to track financial transactions in real time made it easier to to commit and hide financial crime. Maxwell died under mysterious circumstances in 1991, the same year as former Texas senator John Tower (who was assisting Maxwell in selling PROMIS software) and investigative reporter Danny Casolaro, The latter was investigating BCCI, the PROMIS software scandal and intelligence/organized crime links.

Chap 10 Reagan Government by Blackmail – details Reagan’s rise to prominence, focusing particularly on the role of longtime Music Corporation of America (MCA) studios president Lew Wasserman and his organized crime links. Wasserman was instrumental in advancing Regan’s TV and film career and funding both his gubernatorial and presidential campaigns. In addition to covering Iran Contra, PROMIS software, BCCI and the CIA-linked savings and loan crisis, this chapter also explores the role of Nebraskan Republican Party activist Larry King as the key organizer of a pedophile ring he ran out of the Franklin Community Credit Union. The latter collapsed in 1988, in part due to King (a major financier of the CIA-backed Contras) siphoning off depositors savings to fund the Contras.

I can’t wait to read volume 2, which concerns Epstein himself and the role he played in arms trafficking, financial fraud, money laundering long before he specialized in sexual blackmail.

*See https://www.christicinstitute.org/. Prior to wide Internet access, subscribers to the Prevailing Winds Catalog/Reader could order among hundreds of carefully researched monographs on research related to intelligence assassinations and drug trafficking and other government crimes.

**The family would also come to play a role in Jeffrey Epstein’s life, specifically his dismissal from Bear Stearns in 1981 following suspected involvement in insider trading.

***The October Surprise was a secret agreement negotiated between Shackley operatives and the Iranian government to sway the results of the 1980 election by delaying release of their US hostages until the inauguration of the new US president (Reagan) in January 1981.

Twitter Files Tip of Iceberg for Needed Church-Style Committee

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 24: U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland (L) and F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray hold a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice on on October 24, 2022 in Washington, DC. The Justice Department announced it has charged 13 individuals, including members of the Chinese intelligence and their agents, for alleged efforts to unlawfully exert influence in the United States for the benefit of the government of China. Kevin Dietsch/Getty ImagesBen Weingarten NewsweekFBI Faces Calls To Be Abolished Over Twitter Files Revelations

The Twitter Files have revealed in stunning detail a largely successful bid by the U.S. national security apparatus to manipulate public opinion at a mass scale by imposing a censorship regime on social media platforms.

This scandal—a conspiracy to police speech in violation of the First Amendment—deserves a congressional probe to reveal the full extent of the collusion between myriad government agencies and Big Tech companies, hold the malefactors to account, and propose laws to prevent it in the future.

Yet this scandal is just one of many perpetrated by the Deep State in recent years. Numerous federal agencies have demonstrated a level of politicization and weaponization so systemic and far-reaching that it demands an expansive investigation—one that could bring about a radical restructuring of the entire security apparatus.

Consider this—by no means comprehensive—list of the many areas ripe for investigation:

The national security apparatus’ alleged inflation of the domestic violent extremist threat—under which they have effectively sought to equate “MAGA” with “terrorist.”FBI’s suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop and seeming unwillingness to pursue related probes, including into how the president might be implicated in corrupt foreign influence-peddling with our worst adversaries—while pursuing, along with the Justice Department (DOJ), the likes of James O’Keefe and Project Veritas over Ashley Biden’s diary.The DOJ’s pursuit of parents critical of draconian COVID-19 policies and Critical Race Theory.DOJ/FBI’s targeting of pro-lifers while treating their attackers with kid gloves.FBI’s alleged purging of conservative employees.DHS’ attempted creation of a Disinformation Governance Board and broader persisting effort across agencies to police “mis-, dis-, and mal-information.”FBI’s deploying of entrapment schemes and use of confidential informants.DOJ/FBI’s double standard in the pursuit of January 6 defendants versus summer 2020 Black Lives Matter rioters.The Mar-a-Lago raid.DOJ/FBI’s hyper-political pursuit of Republican members of Congress, state legislators, and numerous others in connection with January 6.

And then there is Russiagate itself and its subsidiary scandals, from the mass of illegal leaks to FISA abuse, the hyper-political prosecution of Michael Flynn and others, the Mueller special counsel’s politicization, and recent revelations that the Department of Justice was snooping on congressional investigators.

The targeting of Donald Trump and his allies, and the comparative non-pursuit of Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and numerous other powerful left-leaning figures alone could fill years’ worth of hearings.

Newsweek subscription offers >

Collectively these areas of inquiry reveal a national security and law enforcement apparatus willing to use and abuse its awesome powers to target dissenters from prevailing ruling-class orthodoxy and protect its own.

The security state is the tip of the spear of a ruling-class war on wrongthink that casts dissenters as terrorists, and aims to silence them by censorship and coercion, or even criminalization.

To their credit, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee telegraphed a desire to pursue many of these threads in a November 2022 report on FBI and DOJ politicization.

In recent days, House Republicans have started to come around to the idea of a Church-style Committee. Though not fleshed out, proponents would seem to be suggesting a desire to create a cross-jurisdictional panel, fully empowered to get to the bottom of the Deep State’s abuses, which extend far beyond the FBI and DOJ.

House Republicans should commit themselves to exposing the Deep State’s corruption and lawlessness, holding such conduct to account, and deterring it going forward.

National security and law enforcement agencies run amok pose an existential threat to our liberty and justice.

As the late Angelo Codevilla, an expert in intelligence community chicanery from his years serving on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, put it, “America’s Intelligence agencies are the deep state’s deepest part, and the most immediate threat to representative government.” And as Codevilla noted elsewhere of the intelligence agencies, “the business they’re in, which involves surveillance, is uniquely dangerous, because surveillance is inherently a political weapon.”

A police state turned on citizens who dare to question regime orthodoxy, armed with the most awesome powers of surveillance ever known in the history of mankind, would mean tyranny.

Any committee that threatens to defang the Deep State will face its wrath, and an onslaught from allies in government and the private sector. And that we had a Church Committee decades ago yet find ourselves living through this present scandalous era demonstrates that such committees are no panacea. A modern-day Church Committee, even if executed with the requisite focus and discipline—requiring shrewd, judicious, and steel-spined personnel—will not alone fix what ails us.

But establishing such a committee is a necessary first step towards at least getting to transparency, without which there can be no accountability.

[…]

Via https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-files-tip-iceberg-needed-church-style-committee-opinion-1770948

With Roughly 1.7 Million NFL Hits in Last 50 Years Why Have We Never Seen an “Arrhythmia” Cardiac Arrest Before?

Damar Hamlin
The Blogging Hounds

The mainstream media is working overtime to avoid any mention that a Covid vaccine played any part in the NFL’s Damar Hamlin’s cardiac arrest. Their established narrative lays blame on a “blow to his chest” as the cause for his heart attack during the 1st quarter of Monday’s game. This explanation is a deliberate attempt to keep the “V” word out of any Hamlin discussions.

Just a few days ago former NBA Utah Jazz legend John Stockton said “I think it’s highly recorded now, there’s 150 I believe now, over 100 professional athletes dead, in the prime of their life, dropping dead that are vaccinated. I had the proof in my hands, the names… I think it’s in the thousands now. Don’t quote me on that”. The media attacked Stockton to ridicule and debunk his statement. In January 2021, even Senator Ron Johnson noticed this issue. Johnson said: “Athletes are dropping dead on the field after receiving the COVID-19 vaccination”. It was just a matter of time before this happened in the NFL.

The investigating team GoodScienceing documented an astonishing 1,114 athletes who died from cardiac arrest since Covid vaccines were released. Years ago the Olympic Committee studied a 38 year period (1966-2004) and found on average, 29 athletes die per year. In December 2021 an Austria outlet compiled a list of 75 athletes who died over 5 months. Fact Checkers attacked Senator Johnson, both of these organizations, and anyone else looking into athlete collapses and deaths. Checkers typically say “there’s no proof they died from the vaccine”, which is true. Very rarely is a strict examination or detailed autopsy conducted on these athletes.

Steve Doocey on FOX News said, “He took a hit to the heart area.”  Doocey suggests the impact on his heart area is why it stopped. To build up this narrative, FOX brings on two doctors and a cardiologist. None of them mention vaccines. The first doctor says “the blow to the chest caused an arrhythmia.” University of Pittsburg Medical Center cardiologist Dr. Bryan Donohue says “the helmet contact to the chest, at just the right time, and just the right location, caused a commotion to the heart”. Why have we not see this more often in the NFL? Donohue has ties to the NFL through UPMC Dr. Joseph Maroon, who worked for the Steelers and the NFL.

There are roughly 65 plays in every one of the 272 regular season NFL games. Let’s assume at least 2 players face a major impact on each play. This means roughly 35,300 impacts are in every NFL season. But there have only been two cardiac arrests in the history of NFL games. One was due to a spinal cord injury, the other was 51 years ago. In 1971 Detroit Lions Chuck Hughes caught the ball and was hit by two opposing players. Mr. Hughes is the only NFL player to die during a game.

With roughly 1.7 million player hits in the NFL over the last 50 years, why have we never seen an “arrhythmia” cardiac arrest before?

Established sportscaster Jim Gray said: “You don’t get on the field unless you are in good shape. If there’s some kind of medical condition, it would have turned up during his career”. Gray is suggesting the NFL look at Hamlin’s recent medical history, which would include the Covid vaccines. Additionally, the chest protectors used by NFL Defensive Backs distribute a frontal impact across the entire front of the body, including the shoulders. The pads have a solid front. The Douglas models have an Air-Management Main Body cushion system for dispersing the energy of big hits. Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world’s leading cardiologists, and the Chief Scientific Officer for The Wellness Company requested Damar Hamlin’s vaccination history as part of any investigation into this tragedy.
[…]Via https://theblogginghounds.com/2023/01/04/with-roughly-1-7-million-nfl-hits-in-last-50-years-why-have-we-never-seen-an-arrhythmia-cardiac-arrest-before/

Public Health Obligation to Disclose Cause of Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Death

Click to Play: An Obligation to Investigate Possible Role of COVID Vaccination in NFL Collapse

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight (FOX News) I told America that there is a building public health obligation to disclose what happened in a case of cardiac arrest and sudden death when it is unexpected with no antecedent disease.

I walked Tucker through the differential diagnosis and concluded that in the case of Damar Hamlin, that COVID-19 vaccine-induced subclinical myocarditis and then arrhythmic cardiac arrest on the field was at the top of the list. Tucker said that’s “fair.”

I think it’s more than fair since the NFL had a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, as did the military, many corporations, universities, and schools. If an EUA vaccine is mandated, then those who have imposed this product on their players, employees, and students have an ethical public health obligation to tell the world what has happened as a result of the mandate and help all those impacted brace for what could happen next.

Damar Hamlin is not just another “unexplained sudden adult death syndrome” case. It was “prime time” for the NFL and now “truth time” for the family, Buffalo Bills doctors, and the University of Cincinnati Medical Center staff. Did he take the vaccine, brand, and doses given? Is the clinical evaluation consistent with COVID-19 vaccine induced subclinical myocardits and resuscitated cardiac arrest?

If not, what is the proven cause of his calamity (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, anomalous coronary arteries, catecholaminergic ventricular tachycardia, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, pulmonary embolus, spinal cord/intracranial injury, etc.).

I anticipate Hamlin will neurologically recover and come off the mechanical ventilator, so it is possible that the moral obligation of disclosure will be in his hands at some point in the future. Likely is NFL career has ended, an ICD will be implanted, but a new mission in public health may lie in front of him. We pray for his swift and full recovery in the hands of excellent medical staff and the support of his family and team.

[…]

Via https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/public-health-obligation-to-disclose