Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 44

The denazification of Israel

Dmitry Orlov

People tend to get very emotional on the subject of Israel, especially now that the Israelis have made it very difficult to regard them as anything other than genocidal maniacs, what with some of them lounging around drinking beer while looking at people starving and dying right beyond the high-security fence which surrounds Gaza, the world’s largest concentration camp.

The Israelis did not invent concentration camps (that was the Brits during the Boer War, 1899-1902); nor did they invent factories of death with such lovely touches as promising prisoners a shower and then gassing them, or bleeding kidnapped Russian children to death to procure blood with which to transfuse wounded soldiers (that was the Nazi Germans during World War II, 1941-45) but the Israelis did add a few touches of their own, such as attracting starving people with the promise of food, then shooting them.

And then there are the scenic overlooks equipped with high-tech binoculars through which to gleefully watch the killing fields of Gaza, and the coastal boat tours from which to do the same from the waters of the Mediterranean, in which the prisoners are forbidden to fish… Oh, and those lovely Israeli T-shirts featuring a pregnant Palestinian woman getting shot : “One bullet, two kills! Yippee!”

Does any of this make you hot under the collar? Are veins beginning to bulge and throb on your fevered brow? Then perhaps such reading is not for you. Such emotional reactions cloud one’s judgement and preclude accurate, dispassionate analysis of the phenomenon of Israel that would allow us to predict the inevitable end of this latest reincarnation of a sporadically recurring, usually short-lived, mostly mythological phenomenon known as “a Jewish state in Palestine.”

Since only the laziest of commentators haven’t yet addressed the issue of Israel, it is hard to keep such analysis fresh and eye-popping. I will attempt to do this by presenting it from a specifically Russian perspective. Israel, you see, is a Soviet creation and at present at least a third of Israelis are Russian Jews — Russian-speaking and with plenty to connect them to their home country, which is not Israel but Russia.

Since we are going to consider the Russian perspective, we must, as is customary, start by traveling back in time, to the creation of the state of Israel. At the time of its creation, Palestine was governed according to the British mandate. And then a very simple, routine thing happened: the British transferred the rights to govern certain Palestinian territories to the new Jewish administration in accordance with the decision of the UN Security Council. It was a lovely beginning, but then the transfer of rights to govern certain Palestinian territories to the Palestinians, which had also been decided by the UN Security Council, somehow inexcusably dragged on, and then was completely forgotten. This often happens with such things, especially if the bureaucratic foot-dragging is to someone’s advantage.

“Whose advantage?” you might quite reasonably inquire. From the very beginning of the creation of the state of Israel, there was a struggle for who would become the main sponsor of the new state, it being tiny and in need of protection and support. But, wishful moralizing aside, in reality such protection and support are never free and certain services are always required in return.

Thus, from the very beginning, this state was created as a client state, its raison d’être being to further the interests of its sponsor. There were two potential sponsors — the USA and the USSR — and they competed for this role more or less in good faith. But then a funny thing happened: at some point, the Israeli administration perfidiously betrayed the USSR. And thus the USA became the sponsor of Israel, with a significant share of influence from Britain as well, while USSR was frozen out.

This initial perfidious betrayal by the Israelis determined all subsequent relations between the USSR/Russian Federation and Israel. For example, it explains Russia’s support of Arab countries, which were, let’s be frank, heavily incentivized to fight with Israel. With a third of Israel’s population Russian, there was never any other choice but to maintain close diplomatic, social and cultural ties, but an unsolved political problem remained.

Perhaps you didn’t know this, but the Russians don’t hold grudges; they write them all down, then patiently wait for an opportune moment to demand payback. Unlike various “popup countries” that are here today, failed states tomorrow, Russia is forever, and such a moment always comes sooner or later. With regard to Israel, such notes, accumulated over the years, by now comprise quite a weighty tome. For example, the Russians very carefully wrote down all the facts pertaining to Israeli treachery and meanness against the Russian Federation during the Syrian campaign.

This compendium of grudges is a working document; you see, all of these slights and injuries have to be rectified in the fullness of time. The Russians always come for what’s theirs. The Russians do forgive, but only those who plead guilty to their misdeeds, correct them and ask forgiveness. As to when they exact their revenge, the American vernacular expression “Surprise, motherfuckers!” springs readily to mind. This should help produce a better understanding of Russia’s position concerning Israel and the current conflict in the Middle East.

There will certainly be surprises, especially as Israel’s sponsor, the US, enters its senescence, as exemplified by its last two presidents, both of them physically rather ancient, one almost a vegetable, another a bloviating buffoon who continuously spews forth a roiling mass of incoherence and self-contradiction. He can in very short order approve an Israeli attack on Iran, join that attack, unilaterally order a cease fire as soon as it fails and Israel starts whimpering about being counterattacked, and then seek a Nobel peace prize for doing so. Meanwhile, the problem of the Epstein client list, which includes everybody who should be in jail but isn’t, is dispensed with using the traditional “I lost it, my dog ate it and I didn’t know about it.”

Russia, on the other hand, has a long-term strategy. And that long-term strategy, though never publicly announced, is that Israel has to be denazified. Zionism, you see, is a rabidly nationalistic creed, indistinguishable from Nazism. Zionists like to portray such statements as “antisemitic”, but such portrayals are an abuse of language and are therefore null and void.

The term “semitic” is a linguistic term that applies to a group of languages that include “Arabic, Amharic, Tigrinya, Aramaic, Hebrew, Maltese, Modern South Arabian languages and numerous other ancient and modern languages.” [Wikipedia]

It also has a mythical, biblical connection with a character named Shem, son of Noah: “The children of Shem are Elam, Ashur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram. […] Abraham, the patriarch of Jews, Christians, and Muslims, is one of the descendants of Arphaxad.” [ibid.] There is nothing to indicate that Jews are the only Semites/Shemites and should have some exclusive claim to that term. By this logic, the Zionists themselves are the worst anti-Semites imaginable, given their treatment of the equally Semitic Palestinians and other Arabs.

Another Nazi-dominated state that Russia is officially planning to have denazified is the Ukraine. Some people still scoff at such characterizations, but the Ukrainians certainly pass the duck test: if it looks, walks and quacks like a Nazi, then it is probably a Nazi. Well then:

• Do the Ukrainians worship genocidal German Nazi collaborators like Bandera and Shukhevich, whose followers nailed children’s tongues to tables, letting them dangle, cut off women’s breasts and disemboweled men, letting pigs feast on their entrails? (There’s all of that in the Russian archives, and more.) Yes, they do; they have named streets after them, erected statues to them and have schoolchildren sing paeans to them.
• Do they sport German Nazi insignias? Yes, they like the Totenkopf and the Wolfsangel very much and they like getting tattooed with the Hackenkreuz. When Ukrainians in military garb bearing Nazi insignia showed up in Germany, where such insignia are illegal, they were politely ignored. (Does Germany need some more denazifying?)
• Do they copy Nazi German slogans? Yes, “Ukrayina ponad use” is a favorite, and it’s a direct translation of “Deutschland, über alles.”
• Do they dream of something like Hitler’s Lebensraum — lands to the east? Yes, they not only covet them but have even unsuccessfully invaded Russia’s Kursk region (committing fat binders full of atrocities and losing over 75 thousand soldiers in the process).
• Do they show genocidal tendencies? Yes, they do, and wish to kill as many Russians (fellow-Slavs) as possible. For a decade now they have been shelling residential districts in what was formerly Eastern Ukraine, peopled by Russians. They have a particular penchant for shelling beaches during summer holidays. They just recently shelled a city beach in Kursk.
• Do they see themselves as a master race? Yes, they have concocted an entire fictional history of themselves and their past greatness. According to some versions, it is they who built the Egyptian pyramids. They also claim to have excavated the Black Sea and heaped up the spoil to make Caucasus mountains. Such nonsense can be readily found in their schoolbooks. Nobody ever said that evil has to be smart.

Is that enough of a duck test for you? I hope so! Back to the Israelis, which, it turns out, are just as ducky as the Ukrainians, minus the German Nazi bling, of course.

• Is Israel “über alles”? Yes, Israelis, in their own minds, are God’s chosen people. According to their foundational myth, Palestine was promised to them by their tribal god Yahweh (Jehovah) in exchange for them promising to follow 10 simple rules chiseled into stone (or some such).
• Fictional history? Yes, there is King David of Israel, of whom no physical evidence exists except for some ambiguous inscriptions. In a land full of ancient ruins, he didn’t leave any. Oh, and that parting of the Red Sea; care to demonstrate? If not, then that’s fictional history.
• Coveting their neighbors’ lands? But of course! Most of the Palestinian lands have by now been absorbed by Israeli “settlers”, evicting the people whose land it actually is. Most recently, Israel grabbed the rest of the Golan Heights and other formerly Syrian territory.
• Genocide much? Yes, their “operation” in Gaza has been officially declared to be such. The Ukrainians worked hard to genocide their fellow-Slavs (but ended up genociding themselves — oops!); the Israelis have been far more successful at genociding their fellow-Semites/Shemites the Palestinians.

The similarities between the Ukraine and Israel do not end there. From the Russian point of view, they are both, to some extent, part of the Russian world. A third of Israel is Russian-speaking while much of the rest came from various parts of the Russian Empire or the USSR. They may be Russian Jews, but to a Russian a person is first Russian and then Mordvin, Mari, Nenets, Bashkiri, Komi, Udmurt, German, Kazakh, Azerbaijani, Armenian, Chechen, Ingush, Ossetian, Buryat, Yakut… Ukrainian… Jew.

A question, then: why would Russia wish to denazify one part of the Russian world but not another? Wouldn’t that be inconsistent of it? Doesn’t it stand to reason that it would want to denazify both? Russia is certainly not alone in wishing to denazify Israel: for one, there is also Iran. When Iranian crowds chant “Death to Israel!” they mean no harm to Jewish people, plenty of whom have been living peacefully in Iran/Persia for a couple of millennia and are treated with respect. Nobody has any particular issues with the Jews; even most of the Israelis are OK; it is the Zionists that are the issue. What they should be chanting is “Death to Zionism!” What’s more, there is no shortage of Jews who think that Zionism is an abomination. There are even Jews who think that the existence of the state of Israel is the result of a blasphemous misinterpretation of the scripture.

[…]

Via https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/88991f2a-d026-4824-a501-6ba884632f56

Mike Benz: “Jeffrey Epstein Working With CIA Since 1981”

By Colin McMahon

As the debate rages over the Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, Foundation for Freedom Online founder Mike Benz took a close look at Epstein’s history with the intel community talking to host Jesse Kelly. Benz has promised a deep dive on the topic soon.

Mike Benz: Epstein was working with the CIA in the early 1980s at the very start of his career after he left Bear Stearns. In 1981, right after leaving Bear Stearns, Jeffrey Epstein created a one-person for-profit company in his one-bedroom New York apartment. It was called the Intercontinental Assets Group, and it held itself out as an international bounty hunter for high-net-worth individuals to both recover money and shield money internationally. Right away in 1981, he starts this company that basically helped royalty and high-net-worth individuals basically recover loan debts or assets owed to them that were held in cryptic offshore bank accounts, as well as helping them structure their own assets in a way that would make it difficult or impossible for others to collect those assets.

And in 1982, just one year into that, he got a fake passport, an Austrian passport, listing his residence as Saudi Arabia. This is a fake passport. This was recovered by the FBI in 2019 when they drilled a hole in Jeffrey Epstein’s safe and recovered this. Prosecutors held this passport up at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Now, this fake passport was so good that it was able to go through four different country checkpoints. It had a false name, but Jeffrey Epstein’s photo, so that he could get back and forth. And why Saudi Arabia? Well, because Jeffrey Epstein, one of his main clients for the group that he set up in 1981, was Adnan Khashoggi.

Adnan Khashoggi was the CIA arms runner for the Iran-Contra affair when Congress blocked the U.S. federal government through a congressional law called the Bolan Amendment, with the Democrats controlling the House of Representatives, banning any U.S. funds from being directed to the overthrow of the Nicaraguan Sandinista government. And the Reagan White House and National Security Council and Central Intelligence Agency wanted to do it anyway. They were left with a problem, which was that the CIA had been neutered during the Jimmy Carter years. There had been prohibitions on the categories of covert activity it could do, and the Bolan Amendment from Congress blocked them from using U.S. aid funds or State Department funds to run the operation.

Enter Jeffrey Epstein and Adnan Khashoggi, his client. During the Iran-Contra affair, which dogged the entire Reagan administration when all this came out, the U.S. was selling arms together with Israel to Iran, which is kind of ironic as the current geopolitics of Israel-Iran play out around missiles flying overhead earlier this month between those two countries. Israel and the U.S. were selling weapons to Iran at that time through Adnan Khashoggi, the Saudi arms dealer who had been working with the CIA for 30 years.

In fact, this all came out in formal, under-oath testimony from the Paris office of BCCI, which was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, one of the largest banks in the world, which was effectively a CIA proprietary bank for running arms to the Mujaheddin when the CIA was creating the Islamo-terrorist network that would later become Al Qaeda and then ISIS. Adnan Khashoggi was a client of that bank, together with the CIA, and the head of the head of the Paris branch said that Adnan Khashoggi personally told him that he was working for the Central Intelligence Agency and Jeffrey Epstein was his money bundler. This is at the height of the Cold War, mind you.

[…]

Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/mike-benz-jeffrey-epstein-was-working-cia-since/

US pours $1.5 billion into building secretive sprawling Israeli military bases

Israeli army continues to deploy helicopters, tanks and armored vehicles near the Gaza border as the Israeli attacks on Gaza continue after humanitarian pause, in Israel on December 2, 2023. [Mostafa Alkharouf – Anadolu Agency]

Middle East Monitor

The US is overseeing a sprawling military construction initiative in Israel, with projects valued at more than $1.5 billion, funded entirely through American aid, Haaretz has revealed citing newly surfaced documents from the US Army Corps of Engineers.

The massive infrastructure programme includes the construction of airbase runways, helicopter hangars, ammunition storage, command centres, and a new headquarters for Israel’s elite naval commando unit, Shayetet 13. The project is being financed through military assistance provided under the terms of the $3.8 billion annual aid package agreed in 2016 by former US President Barack Obama.

Haaretz, which first reported the story, notes that the US military aid is also covering upgrades to accommodate Israel’s new fleet of CH-53K heavy-lift helicopters and KC-46 Pegasus refuelling aircraft. In one instance, contractors were told that the tender, worth $900 million, would fund facilities linked to Israel’s expanded squadrons of F-15IA and F-35 fighter jets.

Though the tenders are formally awarded to American firms, the bulk of construction work is subcontracted to Israeli companies. More than 20 separate projects are underway or planned, according to the US Army Corps’ documents and presentations. Many are said to be operating under coded designations to obscure their precise locations.

The building spree contradicts mounting demands in the US for a foreign policy realignment focused on domestic priorities. Calls from across the political spectrum, especially among supporters of the “America First” movement, have urged Washington to halt or condition aid to Israel amid its ongoing genocide in Gaza, which has killed over 57,000 Palestinians.

Yet despite US officials claiming the aid is for mutual security, the scale of America’s construction projects in Israel shows something else entirely: deep, long-term military entrenchment.

Take Tel Nof Airbase, for instance. A US-funded project there—referred to in documents as “Site 20136”, involves major upgrades to prepare for Israel’s new CH-53K military helicopters. This means building new hangars, expanding runways and setting up advanced maintenance areas.

Another project, called “Tama 38/58,” is focused on overhauling Israeli army facilities used to repair tanks and other armoured vehicles. Although it shares its name with Israeli urban planning codes, this US-funded “Tama” project has nothing to do with civilian infrastructure, it’s purely military.

And that’s just the beginning. Other US-backed initiatives include constructing new piers for the Israeli Navy, building underground bunkers, expanding weapons storage, and even renovating housing for US personnel stationed at Israeli bases. One massive site known as “Site 911” is an underground command centre, built with millions in American taxpayer money. Another, “Site 81,” is a secret facility beneath a building in central Tel Aviv.

Together, these projects paint a clear picture: the US isn’t just supporting Israel with weapons—it’s physically building the infrastructure of Israel’s military power, on Israeli soil, with American money.

The scale of US military construction in Israel has drawn renewed scrutiny amid shifting public opinion and calls from lawmakers for greater transparency. The expansion of this infrastructure raises ongoing questions about the scope, cost and strategic intent of US security assistance to Israel.

[…]

Via https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250708-us-pours-1-5-billion-into-building-secretive-sprawling-israeli-military-bases/

Tucker Carlson: Govt ‘covering up’ Epstein files to protect US/Israeli intelligence services

By WILL POTTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Tucker Carlson believes the government is ‘covering up’ the Epstein files to protect US and Israeli intelligence services.

The former Fox News host is leading a MAGA backlash against the Trump admins’ failure to deliver on its promise to release Epstein’s anticipated ‘client list.’

Trump and his allies had long teased the release of significant information about the disgraced financier’s mysterious death and a list of influential figures linked to Epstein’s crimes.

But in a major U-turn this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi said there is no evidence Epstein was murdered or that he kept anything amounting to a ‘client list.’

On his podcast today, Tucker said it was ‘obvious’ that Bondi was ‘covering up crimes’.

Amid mounting scrutiny over Trump’s handling of the controversy, Carlson said he is not convinced that the president was covering his own alleged ties to Epstein, and felt the reason is hinged on espionage.

‘I don’t think he’s that guy, actually,’ Carlson said of Trump. ‘I don’t think he likes creepy sex stuff.’

Rather, Carlson floated a more sinister plot to protect the US and Israeli intelligence agencies was driving Trump’s response.

‘The only other explanation that I can think of… is that intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli, and they’re being protected,’ he said.

Tucker Carlson said he believes the Trump administration’s ‘cover up’ of files related to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is aimed at protecting the US and Israeli intelligence services

Carlson waded into the controversy surrounding Epstein after Trump’s administration issued a memo this week claiming that the notorious pedophile had ‘no client list’ and ruled that his mysterious death in 2019 was a suicide

‘I think that seems like the most obvious.’

Carlson waded into the controversy hours after  former Trump advisor Steve Bannon is implicated in the Epstein files.

Musk also alleged weeks ago that Trump is in the Epstein files, saying that ‘is the real reason they have not been made public.’

But on Carlson’s show, his guest Sagaar Enjeti, the host of Breaking Points, agreed that intelligence services likely had a role in the growing scandal over the release of the files.

Enjeti pointed to reports in 2021 that alleged that federal prosecutors had chosen not to prosecute pedophilia cases within the CIA.

‘There have been multiple documented cases of pedophilia inside of the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers,’ he said.

‘This was a BuzzFeed News piece years back where the CIA specifically did not want to prosecute those individuals in federal court for fear that they would reveal sources and methods if they were pulled into open court and they basically just made it go away.

‘The only time they actually prosecuted somebody for child pornography was whenever he’d already been prosecuted for mishandling classified information.’

Carlson joked in response: ‘Well, when they want to crush you, they put kiddie porn on your computer. It’s why I don’t have a computer!’

The issue of Trump’s handling of the Epstein files led the president to snap at a reporter on Tuesday when they asked Bondi about the Justice Department’s internal review of the documents.

Trump brushed off fury from his MAGA base over the abrupt conclusion of the Epstein probe this week, and accused the reporter who quizzed Bondi of ‘desecrating’ the deadly Texas flood tragedy.

‘Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?’ Trump lamented to reporters present for his six-month Cabinet meeting. ‘This guy’s been talked about for years.’

He said that the media needs to move on from ‘this creep’ Epstein and focus more on the tragedy in Texas and ongoing wars in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine.

In the past, Trump has riled up his base with theories over Epstein’s death, and in his 2024 campaign he vowed to release all the government’s secrets, along with documents from the much-scrutinized assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.

Trump, however, is now ready to move on from the Epstein files.

‘Do you want to waste the time – do you feel like answering?’ Trump asked his Attorney General, who was just one seat away from the president with Secretary of State Marco Rubio between them during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday.

Bondi said she didn’t mind answering the question, but Trump continued his tirade against the Post reporter.

‘I mean, I can’t believe you’re asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we’re having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas.

‘It just seems like a desecration, but you go ahead,’ he said to his embattled attorney general.

Bondi then sought to clarify her past remarks about having Epstein’s ‘client list’ on her desk, saying she never admitted there was a ‘client list’ and that she was actually referencing the complete paperwork related to the investigation into Epstein’s child sex trafficking crimes.

She then said that the reason more evidence was not released is because it contained child pornography.

‘They turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein,’ Bondi said. ‘Never going to be released, never going to see the light of day.’

[…]

Via https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14887093/Tucker-Carlsons-jaw-dropping-theory-Trump-burying-Epstein-list.html

The Filipino Children of International Sex Tourists

Fallen Angels

RT (2017)

Film Review

https://en.rtdoc.tv/films/428-fallen-angels

This documentary concerns the large number of Filipino children fathered by international sex tourists. The filming takes place in Angeles City, home to a US Air Force Base until 1991. Retired Americans and other nationalities still flock there to buy sex.

The filmmakers help the children make videos addressed to their dads, asking them to spend just one day with them.

Some of the mothers are still forced to work as call girls and pole dancers to support their children. In one instance where the mother became too old to work in a bar, the grandmother has assumed custody of the baby,who she supports by doing laundry. In another, the children is raised by an adopted transgender mother after being abandoned by his biological mother. The former runs a hair salon from her home to support him.

Most of her neighbors have children with absent German, Scottish, Australian, British, Irish and American fathers. They get teased at school for their mixed race appearance. This, in turn, leads to truancy, though the older girls acknowledge the importance of education, so they don’t end up working “in the bar” like their moms.

There is one interview with a British immigrant who married his Filipino lover when she became pregnant. Both have subsequently suffered strokes.

Trump denies cover-up in Jeffrey Epstein case

US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman announces charges against Jeffery Epstein, New York City, July 8, 2019. ©  Stephanie Keith / Getty Images

RT

The US president has urged supporters not to spread speculation about the alleged list of the sex offender’s clients

US President Donald Trump has pushed back against claims of a cover-up in the Jeffrey Epstein case, defending his administration’s handling of the release of files related to the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender’s death in jail.

Some of Trump’s allies, including journalist Tucker Carlson and former adviser Steve Bannon, have criticized a report by the Department of Justice and the FBI, which found no evidence of a list of powerful individuals to whom Epstein trafficked underage girls. The report also found no signs of foul play in Epstein’s 2019 death at a Manhattan correctional facility, which was ruled a suicide.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump claimed that the Epstein Files were created by prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called ‘friends’ are playing right into their hands,” he wrote.

“Why didn’t these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn’t they use it?” he added.

Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi and argued that federal agencies should instead focus on investigating Democrat-linked scandals and corruption, as well as the 2020 presidential election, which he continues to claim was rigged in favor of Joe Biden. “LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB – SHE’S GREAT!” Trump wrote. He previously said the Epstein case has been used to distract from more pressing issues, including the deadly floods in Texas.

FBI Director Kash Patel also dismissed the allegations. “The conspiracy theories just aren’t true, never have been,” he wrote on X.

Critics have pointed to a minute-long gap in the surveillance footage outside Epstein’s cell on the night of his death, claiming the tape had been doctored. Bondi, however, denied that there is anything suspicious about the video.

The debate surrounding the case has reportedly caused a rift within the government, with several news outlets claiming that FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is considering resigning.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/news/621399-trump-denies-epstein-coverup/

Catherine Austin Fitts: Epstein file linked to $20 trillion stolen from Pentagon and global vaccine coverup

By Medeea Greere

Former Bush official Catherine Fitts says the Epstein files could blow open the real agenda behind Operation Warp Speed, the missing $20 trillion from the Pentagon, and the totalitarian biotech control system disguised as “health.” It’s not just about trafficking. It’s about global financial and biological domination.

Catherine Austin Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George H.W. Bush, has ripped the mask off the real Epstein story — and what she reveals is nuclear.She claims Epstein’s files are the tip of a far deeper iceberg, one that links child trafficking, intelligence operations, vaccine blackmail, and the largest financial theft in American history.

We’re not talking about millions. We’re not even talking about billions. We’re talking about over $20 TRILLION — money that has vanished from Pentagon ledgers with zero accountability, zero audits, and zero explanation.

And the same network that funneled that money into black ops, secret tech, and off-grid power structures… is the same network behind the global COVID vaccine campaign.

FOLLOW THE TRILLIONS: FROM EPSTEIN TO THE PENTAGON HOLE

Fitts has tracked the missing money for over two decades. Her conclusion is blunt:

“The U.S. taxpayer was looted. Epstein’s operation was one of the pipelines. And the cover-up continues through pharma, media, and digital finance.”

According to her, Epstein’s true role wasn’t just as a sex trafficker. He was a financial blackmail tool, used by intelligence agencies to compromise politicians, bankers, and CEOs — and ensure compliance while the system was being drained dry. And guess what? Those names are in the sealed files.

CEOs of pharma companies? Check. Former Pentagon officials? Check. Tech billionaires funding mRNA platforms? Check. Central bankers, royalty, and BlackRock execs? CHECK.

The reason those files haven’t been released isn’t to “protect victims.” It’s to protect the real criminals — the ones who signed off on both the theft of trillions and the mass bio-experiment launched under Operation Warp Speed.

OPERATION WARP SPEED: THE BIO-MILITARY COVER-UP

Now we arrive at the core. The smoke screen. The master stroke.
Operation Warp Speed — a rushed, militarized, propaganda-laced vaccine campaign led not by doctors… but by DARPA, Pfizer, and BlackRock-connected agents.

Let’s break this down:

Who funded the tech?
mRNA platforms were developed with Pentagon money, under classified bio-defense budgets.

Who ran the operation?
General Gustave Perna — a military logistics commander, not a public health official.

Who manufactured the shots?
Private pharma companies shielded from liability, with ties to Epstein-linked executives and biotech investors.

Who pushed the narrative?
Silicon Valley, mainstream media, and bought-out medical institutions — the same ones who buried the Epstein story for years.

Fitts puts it clear:

“First they robbed your Treasury. Then they came for your bloodstream.”

WHY EPSTEIN STILL MATTERS: HE WASN’T JUST TRAFFICKING CHILDREN — HE WAS TRAFFICKING SECRETS

The mainstream wants you to believe Epstein was just a pervert. But the reality is he was a high-level asset in a global control operation.

He trafficked information. He collected leverage. He controlled through compromise — sexual, financial, and digital. And within his files are the names of those who:

Moved untraceable Pentagon funds into shell networks Financed illegal surveillance programs and social engineering tools Tied the vaccine agenda to biotech surveillance, digital ID, and population tracking

Those files are the missing puzzle piece between:

The missing $20 trillion
Operation Warp Speed
The collapse of civil liberties under the pandemic narrative

Unsealing them would connect the dots from elite child abuse to full-spectrum societal control. That’s why they’ll burn the world before they release them.

IF THE TRUTH COMES OUT, THE SYSTEM COLLAPSES

This is not hyperbole. This is a system on the brink. If the Epstein documents are fully unsealed — and if they confirm the web of connections Catherine Fitts outlines — then the fallout is biblical:

Mass resignations from military, pharma, and government sectorsCriminal prosecution of sitting officials and media mogulsCollapse of public trust in vaccines, defense institutions, and the medical-industrial complexThe end of the dollar-based global order, as trillions in black funds are exposed

[…]

Via https://amg-news.com/bombshell-intel-released-operation-warp-speed-exposed-epstein-files-linked-to-20-trillion-stolen-from-the-pentagon-the-global-vaccine-cover-up-video/

US Treasury reports surprise surplus

© Getty Images / Bjarte RettedalRT The gains are largely driven by President Donald Trump’s tariff hikes, which pushed customs duty collections to record highs

The US government posted a surprise budget surplus in June, driven by a sharp increase in customs duties amid President Donald Trump’s tariff hikes, the Treasury said in a monthly report on Friday.

The report shows a surplus of just over $27 billion last month, following a deficit of over $300 billion in May. Much of the increase stems from Trump’s import tariffs introduced since April. Customs duties totaled around $27 billion, up from just $7 billion a year ago – a 301% rise. Since the fiscal year began in October 2024, total tariff collections have exceeded $113 billion, nearly doubling from 2024.

Commenting on the report, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the country is “reaping the rewards” of Trump’s tariff campaign.

”As President Trump works hard to take back our nation’s economic sovereignty, today’s Monthly Treasury Statement is demonstrating record customs duties – and with no inflation!” Bessent wrote on X. Earlier this week, he claimed that customs duty collections could hit $300 billion by the end of the year.

Trump’s first round of tariffs on April 2 – which he called Liberation Day – included 10% tariffs on nearly all US trade partners and steeper rates on China, Mexico, Canada, and the EU. Some measures were delayed for trade talks, but since then, Trump has added tariffs on steel, copper, aluminum, and other key imports. He recently imposed a 25% tariff on goods from Japan and South Korea, with more reportedly planned if no deals are reached.

US trade partners have pushed back against Trump’s tariffs. India, which has been hit with a 50% tariff, has proposed retaliatory tariffs under WTO rules. China, which faces triple-digit tariffs, has called Trump’s moves unlawful, but has paused retaliatory measures amid ongoing talks. Both countries are members of BRICS, which Trump has accused of conducting “anti-American policies” and which he threatened with additional 10% tariffs earlier this month.

The EU has warned of lasting damage due to the tariffs. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said this week that the bloc’s relationship with the US “may never go back to what it used to be.”

Russia has not been hit with the tariffs due to the sweeping sanctions on the country that already exist, but Trump said this week he may support a bill that would impose 500% tariffs on countries that buy its goods and energy. The measure, proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham, aims to pressure Moscow to end the Ukraine conflict. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov dismissed the threat, saying the country will adapt and won’t be swayed from its “sovereign path.” Moscow has said it is ready to negotiate with Kiev, but insists that any peace settlement must reflect the battlefield realities and guarantee Ukrainian neutrality, demilitarization, and denazification.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/business/621381-us-budget-surplus-tariffs/

Why Public Funds Should be Deposited in Publicly Owned Banks

By Ellen Brown

[…]

Yet we cannot do without the functions banks perform; and one of these is the creation of “money” as dollar-denominated bank credit when they make loans. This advance of credit has taken the form of “fractional reserve” lending, which has been heavily criticized. But historically, it is this sort of credit created on the books of banks that has allowed the wheels of industry to turn. Employers need credit at each stage of production before they have finished products that can be sold on the market, and banks need to be able to create credit as needed to respond to this demand. Without the advance of credit, there will be no products or services to sell; and without products to sell, workers and suppliers cannot get paid.

Bank-created deposits are not actually “unbacked fiat” simply issued by banks. They can be created only when there is a borrower. In effect, the bank has monetized the borrower’s promise to repay, turning his promise to pay tomorrow into money that can be spent today — spent on the workers and materials necessary to create the products and services that will be sold to repay the loans. As Benjamin Franklin wrote, “many that understand Business very well, but have not a Stock sufficient of their own, will be encouraged to borrow Money; to trade with, when they have it at a moderate interest.”

If banks have an unfair edge in this game, it is because they have managed to get private control of the credit spigots.  They have often used this control not to serve business, industry, and society’s needs but for their private advantage. They can turn credit on and off at will, direct it at very low interest to their cronies, or use it for their own speculative ventures; and they collect the interest as middlemen. This is not just a modest service fee covering costs. Interest has been calculated to compose a third of everything we buy.

Anyone with money has a right to lend it, and any group with money can pool it and lend it; but the ability to create money-as-credit ex nihilo (out of nothing), backed by the “full faith and credit” of the government and the people, is properly a public function, the proceeds of which should thus return to the public. The virtues of an expandable credit system can be retained while avoiding the exploitation to which private banks are prone, by establishing a network of public banks that serve the people because they are owned by the people.

The Stellar Example of the Bank of North Dakota

Publicly-owned banks can exist at many levels, from giant multinational infrastructure banks, to national infrastructure or postal banks, to local banks owned by states, counties, cities or tribes. In his 2021 book titled Public Banks, Professor Thomas Marois showed that 17% of banks are publicly owned, with collective assets just under $49 trillion. In the US today, many groups are working on establishing local public banks. But our only existing state-owned bank is the century-old Bank of North Dakota (BND).

The BND was founded in 1919, when North Dakota farmers rose up against the powerful out-of-state banking-railroad-granary cartel that was unfairly foreclosing on their farms. They formed the Non-Partisan League, won an election, and founded the state’s own bank and granary, both of which are still active today.

The BND operates within the private financial market, working alongside private banks rather than replacing them. It provides loans and other banking services, primarily to other banks, local governments, and state agencies, which then lend to or invest in private sector enterprises. It operates with a profit motive, with profits either retained as capital to increase the bank’s loan capacity or returned to the state’s general fund, supporting public projects, education, and infrastructure.

According to the BND website, more than $1 billion had been transferred to the state’s general fund and special programs through 2018, most of it in the previous decade. That is a substantial sum for a state with a population that is only about one-fifteenth the size of Los Angeles County.

The BND actually beats private banks at their own game, generating a larger return on equity (ROE, that is, net profit divided by shareholder equity) for its public citizen-owners than even the largest Wall Street banks return to their private investors (for figures, see below). These profits belong to the citizens and are generated without taxation, lowering tax rates. On October 3, 2024, Truth in Accounting’s annual Financial State of the States report rated North Dakota #1 in fiscal health, with a budget surplus per taxpayer of $55,600. Small businesses are now failing across the country at increasingly high rates; but that’s not true in North Dakota, which was rated by Forbes Magazine the best state in which to start a business in 2024.

Why So Profitable? The BND Model

For nearly a century, the BND maintained a low profile. But in 2014, it was featured in the Wall Street Journal, which reported that the Bank of North Dakota “is more profitable than Goldman Sachs Group Inc., has a better credit rating than J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and hasn’t seen profit growth drop since 2003.” The article credited this success to the shale oil boom; but North Dakota was already reporting record profits in the spring of 2009, when every other state was in the red and the oil boom had not yet hit.

The average ROE of the BND from 2000 through 2024 (its latest annual report) was 19.4%. Compare JPMorgan Chase (JPM), by far the largest bank in the country, with 2.4 trillion in deposits. Its average ROE from 2000-23 was 11.38% over the same period. For a detailed breakdown, see here.

The BND does not need to advertise or compete for depositors. It has a massive, captive deposit base in the state itself, which must deposit all of its revenues in the BND by law.  Most state agencies also must deposit there. The BND takes some token individual deposits, but it does not compete with local banks for commercial deposits or loans. As for municipal (as distinct from state) government deposits, the BND generally not only reserves those deposits for local community banks but enhances their ability to secure municipal deposits. In many states, stringent collateral requirements are attached to municipal government deposits, such as a 110% collateral requirement with high quality securities. This essentially prevents local banks from using municipal deposits to fund local lending. In North Dakota, however, the BND provides letters of credit that guarantee the deposits of municipal governments and other public corporations, making collateral unnecessary and making municipal deposits available for local lending. In addition to its deposit base, the BND also has a substantial capital base, with a capital fund totaling $1.059 billion in 2023, along with deposits of $8.7 billion.

The State’s Deposits Are Safer in Its Own Bank

The BND is not only more profitable but also safer than JPM. In fact federal data show that JPM is the most systemically risky bank in the country. The BND, by contrast, has been called the nation’s safest bank. Its stock cannot be short-sold, since it is not publicly traded; and it will not suffer a run, since the state would not “run” on itself.

[…]

Advantages of a State-owned Bank for the Public, Local Government and Local Banks

Like private banks, a publicly-owned bank has the ability to create money in the form of bank credit on its books, and it has access to very low interest rates.   As a result, North Dakota banks were able to avoid the 2008-09 subprime and securitization debacles and the 2023 wave of bank bankruptcies.

[…]

Serving the State as a Rainy Day Fund and for Disaster Relief

Unlike the Federal Reserve, which is not authorized to support state and local governments except in very limited circumstances,  North Dakota’s “mini-Fed” can help directly with state government funding. Having a cheap and ready credit line with the state’s own bank reduces the need for wasteful rainy-day funds invested at minimal interest in out-of-state banks.

[…]

Progress and Challenges

In the past 15 years, groups across the country have worked diligently to establish publicly-owned banks in their states and communities. A big push came in 2011 with the Occupy Wall Street movement, demonstrating that even the dry subject of banking can incite large groups of people to take action in times of economic crisis. Many people moved their individual deposits out of big Wall Street banks into local community banks, but what about the large public deposits held by state and local governments? No community bank was large enough for their needs. The Bank of North Dakota demonstrated the feasibility of another alternative: the state or city could form its own bank.

Although more than 50 public bank bills and resolutions have been filed since 2010, the only new bank to emerge is the Territorial Bank of American Samoa, founded in 2016. Lobbying in opposition by big private banks has deterred politicians, who are reluctant to rock the boat when times are good and no immediate need is perceived. However, times are not so good today for the majority of the population, and they could soon get worse even for the wealthy.

To muster the political will to take action, politicians need a business plan in which the benefits of establishing their own banks clearly outweigh the costs; and public bank advocates today face hurdles that the BND avoided by being grandfathered in before the relevant agency rules were instigated.

One hurdle is that states today typically require uninsured public funds to be backed by pledged collateral (i.e. surety bonds or letters of credit) exceeding 100 percent of the value of the deposits. California, for example, has state tax revenues exceeding $80 billion. As a single deposit in a bank, only $250,000 of that sum would be covered by FDIC insurance, leaving the balance uninsured; so the state insures that balance with a collateral requirement that is 110% of uninsured deposits. The result is to tie up more liquidity than the deposits provide. Public banking advocates argue that the requirement is unnecessary and unfairly burdensome for state-owned banks. The deposits of the BND, which was chartered as “the State of North Dakota doing business as the Bank of North Dakota,” are backed by the state itself. Meanwhile, letters of credit, e.g. from a Federal Home Loan Bank, are a viable alternative.

Another hurdle is that most state constitutions prohibit the state from “lending its credit” to private parties. This has been construed as prohibiting the state from owning a bank, but legal memoranda have refuted that interpretation.

Besides a profitable business plan, politicians need a push from their constituents to take action, and most people haven’t heard of public banks and don’t understand the concept. Wider public exposure and education are necessary. Even many politicians are unaware of how banking actually works. Chartered depository banks have the power to create money as deposits when they make loans, expanding the local money supply and increasing the capacity for local productivity. Over 95% of our money supply today is created by banks in this way. This vast power to create money as credit is one that properly belongs in the public domain.

Times are changing, and public banking momentum continues to grow. By making banking a public utility, with expandable credit issued by banks that are owned by the people, the financial system can be made to serve the people and local enterprise without draining their resources away. Credit flow can be released so that industry and free markets can thrive, and the economy can move closer to reaching its full potential.

[…]

Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/public-funds-deposited-publicly-owned-banks/5894659

 

Catherine Austin Fitts: “How Many People in this Administration have Major Files in the Epstein Operation”?

Top Row: CIA Director William Burns, Thomas Pritzker, executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels, Sergy Brin, co-founder of Google, Larry Page, co-founder of Google, Mort Zuckerman, a real-estate billionaire who owns US News & World Report. Bottom Row: Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase Bank, President Donald Trump, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of HHS.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Catherine Austin Fitts was interviewed on the David Knight show last week.

Catherine Austin Fitts is a Wharton graduate, and was the first woman to be promoted to managing director of Dillon, Read and Co, Inc., the “prototypical elitist men’s club Wall Street investment bank.”

Fitts was instrumental in building a new market for Dillon Read. She began underwriting previously unrated municipal bonds, in essence, financing large government projects which other Wall Street firms said couldn’t be done.

These novel bond sales helped revive New York City’s crumbling subway system, and they provided funding for the City University of New York and other major projects.

The market in unrated and low-rated muni bonds took off, earning Fitts the title of “Wonder Woman of Muni Bonds,” in a glowing Business Week article (February 23, 1987). (Source.)

Fitts worked on the campaign of George H. W. Bush during the 1988 United States presidential election, and was appointed as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing in the Bush administration, where she was charged with repairing the department’s reputation in the aftermath of the savings and loan crisis.

She resigned her post in 1990, following a report that her relationship with Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Jack Kemp had soured. (Source.)

After leaving government, Fitts founded Hamilton Securities, an employee-owned brokerage house, which she ran until 1998. In 1993, Hamilton Securities won a contract with HUD to manage its $500 billion investment portfolio.

However, she did her job too well, as she learned that when you save taxpayers money, you are often lowering revenues for the D.C. crime syndicate.

The Bush family, or those associated with the Bush family, allegedly destroyed her career and threatened to murder people in her family if she went public with what she knew, and she briefly touches on this in her interview with David Knight.

She now runs the Solari Report as a totally private entity.

I have annotated down about 7 minutes from her nearly 1-hour interview with David Knight, where she talks about the Epstein financial network of laundering money.

She asks the question, “How many people in this current administration have major files in the Epstein operation“?

Here’s a partial transcript:

They’re all scared (in the Trump administration). How many people in this current administration have major files in the Epstein operation?

The only guy who doesn’t look scared about the whole thing is Howard Lutnik, because he had the house next door (to Epstein). I’m assuming he got the downloads. Are the Epstein tapes over in his house?

Between the administration and Congress, how many people do you think will stand real transparency around the Epstein files?

When I was in Washington, the Cabinet Secretary (Jack Kemp) I was working for was compromised in the Franklin cover up.

And when the Washington Times started running stories about the Franklin Cover-up, he just went crazy, and was being blackmailed. And I was in the middle of it, because he was trying to order me to do illegal things, and I wouldn’t do it.

I’ve never seen a human being more terrified, more afraid. I mean he was just terrified.

Because here he is, you know, a big family man and a Christian, and somebody is blackmailing him, presumably over pedophilia and he’s scared to death.

There’s a wonderful book called the Red Mafia by Robert Freidman, about the Russian mafia. And the important thing to understand about the Russian mafia is they’re 99% Jewish. So you have enormous rat lines through the Ukraine, into Israel, into New York, and London.

So London, New York, Israel, Ukraine.

When we talk about the Ukraine, you can think of it as a war, (but) I think of it as a huge financial money laundering operation. The Epstein operation is right in the middle of that.

And when Trump says to Zelensky “you don’t hold the cards,” Zelensky is thinking “No, my name is on the bank accounts, and I still got pots of money, and I have all the intel about where the money came in, and where it went out.”

So he does hold cards, is what it looks like to me.

Here is the 7-minute video:

The full David Knight interview can be watched here.

A great source that I found about the story of Catherine Austin Fitts, is an article published in 2002 by Scoop Independent News, titled: Enemy Of The State – The Catherine Fitts Story. It is on Archive.org.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2025/catherine-austin-fitts-how-many-people-in-this-administration-have-major-files-in-the-epstein-operation/