Jacob Morgan's Blog, page 6

Why Can’t I Add Someone on Facebook? Troubleshooting and Solutions

Facebook is a vital social networking platform for connecting with friends, family, and acquaintances. However, you may sometimes encounter issues when trying to add someone as a friend. The message “Why can’t I add someone on Facebook?” appears often, leaving users confused and frustrated. Whether it’s a restriction on their account, privacy settings, or a technical glitch, several factors can prevent you from adding someone on Facebook.

In this article, we will explore the various reasons why you might be unable to add someone as a friend on Facebook, from privacy settings to account restrictions. We’ll also provide practical steps you can take to resolve the issue and ensure that your Facebook experience remains seamless. Continue reading to discover the most common causes of this issue and learn how to resolve them.

Why Can’t I Add Someone on Facebook?
If you can’t add someone on Facebook, several things could be causing the issue. It could be due to their privacy settings, where they’ve limited friend requests from non-friends. It might also be because Facebook has placed restrictions on your account due to suspicious activity. Additionally, if you’ve already sent a friend request that hasn’t been accepted yet, you may need to wait for them to respond before you can send another request. Check your account’s settings and ensure that you’re following Facebook’s guidelines to resolve the issue.

Trouble Adding Friends on Facebook? Here’s Why

Trying to add someone on Facebook but unable to do so can be pretty frustrating. The issue can stem from a variety of factors, each influencing whether or not you can send a friend request.

One common reason is the privacy settings on the other person’s profile. Many Facebook users restrict who can send them friend requests, often limiting it to “Friends of Friends” or specific groups. If the person you’re trying to add has enabled these settings, you won’t be able to send them a request.

Another reason could be that you’ve reached the friend request limit. Facebook places limits on the number of friend requests you can send over a specific period. If you’ve sent a large number of requests recently, you might be temporarily blocked from sending more.

If the person you’re trying to add has already sent you a friend request, you won’t be able to send one back. You’ll need to wait for them to accept or cancel it.

Additionally, Facebook account restrictions may prevent you from adding others. If Facebook has flagged your account due to suspicious behavior or violations, it may block you from sending friend requests.

Finally, technical glitches or bugs might also be causing the issue. Facebook occasionally experiences temporary problems that could prevent the functionality of friend requests.

How Can I Fix the Issue of Not Being Able to Add Someone on Facebook?

If you’re having trouble adding someone on Facebook, there are several steps you can take to resolve the issue and get back to connecting with others.

Step 1: Check Your Friend Request Limit

Facebook has a limit on how many friend requests you can send in a specific time period. If you’ve reached this limit, you’ll need to wait a few days before sending any more requests. Be patient, as this is a temporary block.

Step 2: Review the Person’s Privacy Settings

Sometimes, users restrict who can send them friend requests. If the person you’re trying to add has set these restrictions, you may not be able to send them a request. In this case, you can try messaging them directly to initiate a connection.

Step 3: Confirm They Haven’t Already Sent You a Request

If the person you want to add has already sent you a friend request, you won’t be able to send one in return. Check your “Friend Requests” section to see if their request is pending. If so, wait for them to accept or decline it.

Step 4: Resolve Facebook Account Restrictions

If your account has been restricted, review any notifications from Facebook to understand the issue. Follow the steps provided to resolve the restriction and regain the ability to send friend requests.

Step 5: Troubleshoot Facebook Bugs

Technical issues can sometimes prevent friend requests from being sent. Make sure you’re using the latest version of the Facebook app or website. If necessary, clear your browser cache or try accessing Facebook from a different browser or device.

When Will I Be Able to Add Someone on Facebook?

If you’ve been blocked from adding someone on Facebook, there are certain timeframes and conditions you need to consider before trying again:

Waiting for a Pending Request to Be Accepted: If you’ve already sent a friend request, you will need to wait for the person to either accept or decline it. You can’t send a new request until the current one is addressed.Friend Request Limit Reset: If you’ve hit the friend request limit, you’ll need to wait for 24 to 48 hours for the system to reset. Once the limit is reset, you can send more requests.Facebook Restrictions Lifted: If Facebook has placed restrictions on your account, you will need to wait until the block is lifted. Facebook typically notifies users about these restrictions and provides guidance on how to resolve the issue.Check the Person’s Profile as an Anonymous Viewer: If you want to see updates or details about a profile you’re unable to add, you might consider using an anonymous viewer . This tool allows you to browse public content without sending a friend request, which can help you stay updated while waiting to resolve the issue.

These timeframes depend on the reason for the restriction, and the duration may vary. It’s important to follow Facebook’s guidelines to avoid further delays.

Why Facebook May Prevent You from Adding Someone?

Facebook may prevent you from adding someone for several reasons related to privacy, security, and account protection. Here are the primary reasons why this may occur:

Account Security Measures: Facebook may flag your account if you send too many friend requests in a short period. This is considered suspicious activity, and as a result, Facebook might temporarily block your ability to add more people.Relationship Between You and the Person: If you and the person you’re trying to add have no mutual connections, Facebook might restrict your ability to send a request. This often happens when the person has set privacy settings that limit friend requests from people they don’t know.Previous Reports: If the person you are trying to add has reported your account in the past, Facebook may block you from sending a request due to privacy and security concerns.Inactive or Fake Accounts: Facebook might restrict you from sending friend requests to accounts that appear inactive or fake. If Facebook detects unusual activity or signs of a fake account, it may block your attempts to connect.

Understanding these factors can help prevent future issues when adding friends on Facebook.

How to Avoid Issues When Adding People on Facebook?

To ensure a smooth experience when adding people on Facebook, follow these simple tips:

Send Friend Requests to People You Know: Always try to send friend requests to people you know or those with whom you have mutual friends. This helps avoid privacy restrictions that may prevent your request from going through.Don’t Spam Friend Requests: Avoid sending too many friend requests in a short time. Facebook’s spam filters may block you temporarily if it detects unusual activity, so be mindful of the number of requests you send.Engage with Mutual Friends First: If you’re having trouble adding someone, consider engaging with mutual friends first. Commenting on their posts or liking shared content increases the chances that the person will accept your friend request.Follow Facebook’s Community Guidelines: Always adhere to Facebook’s community guidelines to avoid any restrictions on your account. Violating these guidelines may limit your ability to send friend requests or even result in account suspension.

By following these tips, you can avoid most common issues when adding friends on Facebook.

Conclusion

In conclusion, if you’re wondering, “why can’t I add someone on Facebook,” there are various reasons, such as privacy settings, account restrictions, or Facebook’s spam prevention measures. Often, the issue can be resolved by waiting for a reset or making adjustments to your settings. 

You may also need to check if the person has restricted friend requests or if you’ve reached the limit for sending them. Understanding the causes behind these limitations and following the steps to resolve them will help you navigate Facebook more smoothly. By staying aware of these factors, you can avoid unnecessary frustration and enhance your social media experience.

FAQ’s

Why can’t I add someone on Facebook even though we have mutual friends?
The person may have restricted their privacy settings to only allow friend requests from “Friends of Friends” or other specific settings. In such cases, even if you have mutual friends, you won’t be able to send a request unless the person changes their privacy settings.

How can I check if I’ve reached the friend request limit?
If Facebook is preventing you from sending more friend requests, it likely means you’ve reached the limit. Facebook temporarily blocks additional requests to prevent spamming. You’ll need to wait 24 hours or longer before trying to send new requests.

What should I do if Facebook is blocking me from adding people?
Facebook may block you from sending friend requests temporarily if you send too many in a short period, which can be seen as spammy behavior. The best course of action is to wait for the block to be lifted and send friend requests more gradually moving forward.

Can I add someone if they have sent me a friend request?
No, if the person has already sent you a friend request, you can’t send one back. You will need to wait for them to accept or decline the request before you can try adding them again.

How do I fix my Facebook account if it’s restricted?
If Facebook has restricted your account, carefully follow the instructions provided in the notification you received. You may need to verify your identity or review any violations of Facebook’s guidelines to regain full functionality.

The post Why Can’t I Add Someone on Facebook? Troubleshooting and Solutions appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

Cloud-Seeding Startup Did Not Cause Texas Floods, Say Atmospheric Experts

In the wake of the devastating floods that swept across Texas, social media users and conspiracy theorists alike have pointed fingers at an unlikely culprit: a cloud-seeding startup known as Rainmaker. The claim? The company’s atmospheric manipulation intensified rainfall and triggered the disastrous deluge. But leading scientists are unequivocal in their response—this theory is baseless and unsupported by any scientific evidence.

Rainmaker did carry out cloud-seeding operations in the broader region days before the storm. However, according to meteorological experts, the timing and nature of the company’s work make it virtually impossible for those actions to have played any role in the rainfall that overwhelmed Texas communities.

“It’s just a complete conspiracy theory. Somebody is looking for somebody to blame,” said Bob Rauber, professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Illinois. Katja Friedrich, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder, was equally clear: “Cloud seeding had nothing to do” with the Texas floods.

Cloud seeding, a technique in use since the 1950s, involves introducing small particles—typically silver iodide—into clouds that contain super-cooled water droplets. These particles serve as artificial nuclei, causing water droplets to freeze into ice crystals. As these crystals grow, they eventually become heavy enough to fall as precipitation. The technique has primarily been employed in mountainous regions during the winter to increase snowfall and improve water supplies during the spring melt.

But while the science behind cloud seeding is sound, its real-world effects are limited. Even in optimal conditions, the amount of additional precipitation generated is modest. For example, in 2017, Rauber, Friedrich, and a team of researchers conducted a detailed study in Idaho, seeding clouds for just over two hours. The result was an estimated 186 million gallons of additional precipitation—a seemingly large number, but minuscule compared to the scale of a major storm system.

“When we talk about that huge storm that occurred with the flooding [in Texas], we’re talking about the atmosphere processing trillions of gallons of water,” Rauber noted. In that context, cloud seeding’s contribution would be little more than a statistical blip.

Moreover, there are compelling scientific reasons to rule out any connection between Rainmaker’s operations and the flooding:

First, the air mass that Rainmaker targeted had likely moved hundreds of miles by the time the storm developed. “The air that was over that area two days before was probably somewhere over Canada by the time that storm occurred,” Rauber explained.

Second, the type of clouds that Rainmaker may have targeted—presumably cumulus clouds common in Texas summers—are not ideal candidates for seeding. Unlike the slow-moving orographic clouds found near mountain ranges, Texas thunderstorms are fast-developing and already highly efficient at generating heavy rain on their own.

“Those clouds are very efficient,” Rauber said. “Seeding those clouds is not going to do anything.”

Even under ideal conditions, seeding such clouds would result in negligible additional rainfall. “The amount of rain that comes out of those seeded clouds is small,” he added.

Despite the clarity from experts, the cloud-seeding theory has gained traction in some corners of the internet, illustrating how misinformation can flourish in the absence of clear understanding. Disasters—especially sudden and overwhelming ones—often leave people searching for someone or something to blame. But turning to pseudoscience can be both misleading and harmful.

Experts emphasize that the real causes of the Texas floods lie in more conventional meteorological factors. An unusually moist atmosphere, driven by warm Gulf air and slow-moving storm systems, dumped massive amounts of rain over already saturated ground. It was a natural disaster, not a manufactured one.

Cloud seeding, while useful in specific contexts—such as boosting snowpack in the Rockies or enhancing rainfall in drought-prone areas—cannot turn an ordinary weather system into a catastrophe. Its effects are small-scale, short-lived, and tightly controlled.

Idaho Power, a utility company that uses cloud seeding to increase winter snowfall, has found the practice cost-effective for hydroelectric power generation. But even they acknowledge that the scale of their results is modest and localized.

In Texas, the storms that caused the flooding involved atmospheric dynamics on a massive scale, far beyond what cloud seeding could influence.

Blaming Rainmaker or cloud-seeding technology for the floods distracts from more urgent conversations, such as improving disaster preparedness, reinforcing critical infrastructure, and addressing the role of climate change in increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.

Climate scientists warn that as the planet warms, the likelihood of such events will only rise. Warmer air holds more moisture, leading to heavier downpours. Urban development without adequate drainage compounds the risk. These are the real issues communities must confront, not unsupported theories rooted in fear and confusion.

As communities in Texas begin the long process of recovery, the public is urged to rely on scientifically sound information and remain wary of viral misinformation. The truth, though more complex than a conspiracy theory, is the key to understanding—and preventing—future tragedies.

The post Cloud-Seeding Startup Did Not Cause Texas Floods, Say Atmospheric Experts appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

Week in Review: Linda Yaccarino Steps Down from X as Tech Giants Reshape the AI and Mobile Landscape

In a week marked by seismic shifts in leadership and technology, the tech world saw significant moves—from Linda Yaccarino’s high-profile resignation as CEO of X to new AI-powered gadgets, foldable phones, and bold EV plays. Here’s your detailed recap of the most impactful developments in the technology space.

Linda Yaccarino Resigns from X After Two Years at the Helm

In a move that surprised many, Linda Yaccarino stepped down as CEO of X (formerly Twitter) after a stormy two-year tenure. Her departure follows a string of ongoing challenges, including persistent advertiser backlash, platform instability, and controversies fueled by Elon Musk, the company’s owner.

While Yaccarino managed to stabilize X’s ad business and attempted to reposition the company amid an AI-driven digital media landscape, tensions surrounding Musk’s erratic leadership style and the platform’s declining trust metrics made the role increasingly difficult.

Why it matters: With her exit, X is once again in a state of flux. The company must now find a successor capable of navigating both technological transformation and corporate turbulence while addressing advertisers’ growing concerns about brand safety.

Apple Walks Back Design Tweaks in iOS 26 Beta

Apple continues refining its upcoming iOS 26 update. The third beta rolls back the extreme transparency elements introduced in the “Liquid Glass” redesign, especially in core apps like Notifications and Apple Music. Early testers cited readability issues and visual discomfort as primary concerns.

Why it matters: Apple appears to be listening to its user base as it fine-tunes the aesthetic versus functional balance—a key focus ahead of the OS’s expected fall release.

Hugging Face Launches Affordable, Open-Source Robot for Developers

AI powerhouse Hugging Face introduced its new open-source desktop robot, Reachy Mini, targeted at developers and robotics enthusiasts. Priced at just $299, the build-it-yourself bot is fully programmable in Python and integrates directly with the Hugging Face Hub.

Why it matters: This move democratizes access to robotics and provides AI practitioners with a tangible, affordable platform to test real-world machine learning applications, from computer vision to conversational AI.

Phone Wars: Samsung and Nothing Unveil Next-Gen Devices

Samsung launched the Z Fold7 and Z Flip7, continuing its foldable phone dominance, and introduced the Z Flip7 FE, a more affordable option for entry-level users. The devices bring incremental upgrades in durability, screen design, and multitasking features.

Nothing, the upstart known for its minimalist tech design, launched the Phone (3) at $799. This model features a secondary display, AI-powered functions, and flagship-tier internals. However, its quirky look and steep price have earned mixed reactions, with many seeing it more as a niche offering than a true competitor to Apple or Samsung.

Why it matters: The smartphone race is heating up with differentiated innovations—from AI integrations to foldable displays—catering to evolving consumer expectations.

Rivian’s New Quad-Motor EVs Aim to Redefine High-End Electric Driving

EV startup Rivian unveiled its ultra-powerful R1T and R1S quad-motor trucks this week. Boasting 1,025 horsepower, a 0–60 mph time under 2.5 seconds, and software-enhanced features like “kick turn” and RAD Tuner, these EVs are aimed squarely at the high-end adventure market. Priced over $115,000, they represent Rivian’s most ambitious models to date.

Why it matters: As Rivian awaits the rollout of its more affordable R2 lineup in 2026, these models are designed to keep the company competitive in the luxury EV space while reinforcing its engineering prowess.

Grok 4: Musk’s AI Vision Faces Objectivity Questions

Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, debuted Grok 4, a chatbot Musk calls “maximally truth-seeking.” However, early testers noted the AI often leans on Musk’s public posts for answers to controversial queries, prompting concerns over objectivity and independence.

Musk revealed plans to integrate Grok into Teslas as early as next week, further intertwining his ventures and raising questions about ethical alignment and user transparency.

Why it matters: The bias concerns highlight the fine line AI companies must walk between innovation and ethical responsibility, especially when the creator’s personal views influence the product.

Apple Loses Top AI Talent to Meta

In a significant talent shift, Ruoming Pang, Apple’s head of AI models, departed for Meta. He is set to join the company’s superintelligence division, signaling Meta’s aggressive push in advanced AI research. Apple’s struggles with scaling its AI capabilities—particularly for on-device use—are now further complicated by this loss.

Why it matters: As Apple attempts to catch up in the generative AI arms race, losing top engineers could delay strategic advancements, especially amid heightened competition from Google, OpenAI, and Meta.

Jack Dorsey Experiments with Decentralized Messaging

Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey quietly launched a closed beta for Bitchat, a Bluetooth mesh-based messaging app that operates without cellular networks or Wi-Fi. Though touted as secure and censorship-resistant, cybersecurity experts are already questioning its privacy claims.

Why it matters: The app reflects growing interest in decentralized communication tools, but also underscores the importance of rigorous security validation before mass adoption.

Intel’s RealSense Spins Out as Independent Company

Intel’s RealSense division has spun off into its own entity, backed by $50 million in funding. Now led by CEO Nadav Orbach, the company aims to expand the use of its 3D stereoscopic imaging technology in robotics, industrial applications, and human-computer interaction.

Why it matters: As demand for spatial perception in AI grows, RealSense could play a pivotal role in enabling safer, smarter automation across sectors.

Bezos-Backed EV Startup Slate Auto Breaks Cover

Slate Auto, a secretive Michigan-based EV startup, emerged from stealth this week with ambitious plans for a low-cost, highly customizable electric pickup truck. Backed by Jeff Bezos, the company has been developing the model for over three years and is targeting mass production by late 2026.

Why it matters: If successful, Slate Auto could disrupt the affordable EV market and challenge dominant players like Tesla and Ford with a new breed of flexible, budget-friendly electric vehicles.

Final Thoughts

This week underscores a broader theme in tech: the transition from experimental to practical applications of AI, EVs, and mobile design. From executive shakeups and platform crises to cutting-edge product launches and talent migrations, the industry continues to evolve at breakneck speed. Whether it’s the AI race, smartphone wars, or decentralized tech, the stakes—and scrutiny—have never been higher.

Want more tech news like this every week?
Subscribe to the TechCrunch Week in Review newsletter and stay informed on the innovations shaping tomorrow.

The post Week in Review: Linda Yaccarino Steps Down from X as Tech Giants Reshape the AI and Mobile Landscape appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

What Software Do Cyber Security Use: Top Tools for Digital Protection

Cybersecurity is the backbone of digital defense in today’s hyper-connected world. As cyber threats become more sophisticated, professionals and organizations are turning to an arsenal of software solutions to detect, prevent, and respond to security breaches. But exactly what software do cybersecurity professionals use?

Understanding the tools that power modern cybersecurity operations is crucial for IT teams, business owners, and aspiring cyber professionals alike. From antivirus software and firewalls to intrusion detection systems (IDS) and SIEM platforms, the right cybersecurity tools can mean the difference between a secure system and a catastrophic data breach.

This guide will explore the most important software used in the cybersecurity industry. We will outline how each type functions, when it’s used, and why it matters—all while ensuring the keyword “what software do cyber security use” is optimized across every section.

What Software Do Cyber Security Use?                                                                                     Cybersecurity professionals use a wide range of software, including antivirus programs, firewalls, encryption tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), SIEM software, VPNs, and endpoint protection platforms. Each serves a specific role in identifying, preventing, and responding to cyber threats.

Top Cybersecurity Tools Used to Prevent Data Breaches

Cybersecurity begins with prevention. Professionals use various proactive software solutions to stop threats before they reach critical systems. Antivirus and anti-malware software are foundational, scanning files and programs for known malicious signatures. These programs are often updated multiple times a day to stay current with emerging threats.

Firewalls act as gatekeepers, monitoring and controlling incoming and outgoing network traffic. Whether hardware- or software-based, firewalls define the rules for safe communication and serve as the first line of defense in any cybersecurity strategy.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) software is another key player in threat prevention. EDR tools monitor endpoints—like laptops, servers, and mobile devices—for suspicious activity and provide automated responses to threats. This is especially critical in a world where remote work is the norm.

Vulnerability scanners such as Nessus or OpenVAS help organizations identify weaknesses in their systems before hackers can exploit them. These tools generate reports that IT teams use to patch and secure their environments.

Security software like web application firewalls (WAFs) protects websites from common attacks such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). By filtering malicious traffic at the application level, WAFs help maintain the integrity of online platforms.

Lastly, data loss prevention (DLP) tools monitor the flow of sensitive data across networks. They prevent employees or attackers from moving critical information outside the organization’s secure environment.

How Do Cybersecurity Experts Monitor Threats?

Monitoring cyber threats requires advanced tools that provide real-time visibility and actionable insights. Here’s how experts stay ahead of attacks.

SIEM: Centralized Threat Detection

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) software is a cornerstone of modern threat monitoring. It gathers logs and security data from multiple sources—servers, firewalls, endpoints, and applications—into a unified system. By analyzing this information in real time, SIEM tools can detect suspicious patterns and generate alerts when anomalies or known threat signatures appear. This allows security teams to react quickly to incidents before they escalate.

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)

Intrusion Detection Systems, such as Snort and Suricata, play a vital role in identifying unauthorized or malicious activities within a network. These tools inspect traffic flows and compare them against a database of known attack signatures. When a match is found, the system notifies administrators, enabling them to take corrective action. IDS tools are crucial for detecting both external attacks and internal misconfigurations.

SOC Platforms for Real-Time Collaboration

Security Operations Center (SOC) platforms consolidate cybersecurity activities into a central command hub. These tools allow teams to monitor threats, share intelligence, and investigate incidents collaboratively. They often integrate with SIEM systems to provide comprehensive oversight.

Behavior Analytics for Insider Threats

User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) tools use machine learning to detect behavioral anomalies. By monitoring user actions over time, they can identify deviations that may signal insider threats or account takeovers, often before any damage is done.

Top Cybersecurity Software Tools Used in 2025 

Cybersecurity professionals in 2025 rely on a variety of advanced software tools to secure digital assets, detect threats, and respond to vulnerabilities. These tools span multiple domains—from network analysis to endpoint protection and penetration testing. Below is a curated selection of the most trusted solutions used across industries today:

Wireshark – A powerful network protocol analyzer that allows security experts to capture and inspect packets in real time, making it ideal for diagnosing network issues and analyzing traffic.
Splunk – A leading SIEM platform that collects and analyzes machine-generated data. It’s widely used for log management, threat detection, and forensic investigation.
Metasploit – A comprehensive penetration testing framework that helps identify system vulnerabilities by simulating attacks.
Kali Linux – A Linux-based OS packed with pre-installed security tools designed for ethical hacking, forensic analysis, and vulnerability assessment.
CrowdStrike Falcon – A cloud-native Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) platform that delivers real-time protection against malware and advanced threats.
Bitdefender GravityZone – Offers robust endpoint security features including antivirus, firewall, and risk management controls.
Burp Suite – A must-have for web application security testing, providing tools for scanning and manual penetration testing.
IBM QRadar – An enterprise-grade SIEM that supports intelligent threat detection and incident response.
Nmap – A lightweight yet powerful network discovery tool used to scan networks and identify open ports or services.
Tenable Nessus – A widely trusted vulnerability scanner that helps organizations detect weaknesses and stay compliant.Why Cyber Security Needs a Variety of Software Solutions 

No single tool can defend against every threat. The modern cyber landscape is filled with diverse attack vectors: phishing, ransomware, insider threats, DDoS attacks, and zero-day exploits. Each type of attack requires a tailored response.

That’s why cybersecurity professionals use a combination of software tools. Antivirus stops known malware, while firewalls block unauthorized access. SIEM systems offer broad visibility, but EDR tools provide deep endpoint analysis. Vulnerability scanners identify weak spots, while encryption tools like VeraCrypt protect data at rest.

The synergy of multiple tools creates a defense-in-depth strategy, ensuring that if one layer fails, others continue to protect the system. Additionally, automation is increasingly integrated into software, with AI-driven tools capable of analyzing millions of events and responding instantly to threats.

Having a diverse toolset also ensures compliance with security frameworks like NIST, ISO 27001, and GDPR. Organizations must demonstrate that they use appropriate safeguards to protect user data.

When Should You Use Cybersecurity Tools and Which Ones Matter Most? 

Knowing when to use cybersecurity tools is just as important as knowing which ones to use. Timely deployment helps prevent breaches before they start.

When to Deploy Cybersecurity Tools

Cybersecurity tools should be implemented proactively, not reactively. Waiting for a threat to materialize before deploying defenses can leave critical systems vulnerable. Continuous monitoring, routine updates, and layered protection strategies are essential components of a strong cyber defense. The timing of deployment is just as important as the type of tool used, as threats can evolve rapidly and strike without warning.

Real-Time Protection for Ongoing Threats

To guard against active threats, tools like CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and Bitdefender are widely used for their real-time protection capabilities. These solutions offer automatic detection and response mechanisms, stopping malware and intrusions before they can spread across the network.

Compliance and Regulatory Requirements

For organizations that must comply with data security laws and regulations, platforms like Splunk and IBM QRadar are vital. These SIEM systems provide centralized logging and reporting, helping businesses demonstrate due diligence. Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tools also play a critical role in ensuring sensitive information doesn’t leak beyond the network perimeter.

Small Business Considerations

Smaller organizations may not need enterprise-grade solutions but still require protection. Antivirus software, cloud-based firewalls, and secure VPNs are more affordable and suitable for modest infrastructures.

Essential Tools for Incident Response

When breaches occur, forensic software such as FTK and EnCase becomes crucial. These tools help investigators uncover how an attack happened, while log analysis and incident management platforms support swift and informed response actions.

Conclusion

What software cybersecurity use is vital in today’s digital age. The right mix of tools—from firewalls to advanced SIEM systems—can empower individuals and organizations to stay secure against evolving threats.

Every cybersecurity software plays a specific role in safeguarding data, infrastructure, and users. A layered, tool-based approach ensures that systems remain resilient against attacks, whether internal or external.

FAQ’s

What is the most commonly used cybersecurity software?

Antivirus tools like Bitdefender and endpoint protection platforms are widely used, along with SIEM systems like Splunk for real-time threat monitoring and compliance.

Can one software tool provide full cybersecurity?

No. A complete cybersecurity strategy requires multiple tools working together to cover various threat vectors, from malware to insider threats and network breaches.

What software do cybersecurity professionals use in government agencies?

Government networks typically use enterprise-grade tools like IBM QRadar, FireEye, and Tenable for SIEM, threat detection, and vulnerability management.

Is free cybersecurity software reliable?

Free tools can offer a decent level of protection for personal use, but they often lack the advanced threat detection, automation, and support needed for organizations.

How often should cybersecurity software be updated?

Cybersecurity software should be updated as frequently as possible—many providers push updates daily or hourly to stay ahead of evolving threats.

The post What Software Do Cyber Security Use: Top Tools for Digital Protection appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

U.S. Navy Accelerates Tech Partnerships with Startups in a Bid to Modernize and Innovate Faster

In a notable departure from decades of sluggish procurement and red tape, the U.S. Navy is swiftly repositioning itself as a serious partner for technology startups. Behind this transformation is Justin Fanelli, the Navy’s Chief Technology Officer, who has spent the last two and a half years dismantling barriers that once discouraged startups from engaging with the military. His mission: to streamline defense contracting and fast-track innovation from the private sector into Navy operations.

While Silicon Valley figures like those at Palantir, Meta, and OpenAI have drawn headlines for donning military uniforms or exploring defense partnerships, Fanelli has been implementing quieter but potentially more impactful changes. His focus is on cutting procurement timelines, rethinking problem-solving frameworks, and making the Department of the Navy more welcoming to agile tech companies that previously saw defense work as unapproachable or unviable.

Instead of prescribing specific solutions, Fanelli and his team now lead with open-ended problems and challenge startups to respond creatively. Using a three-phase model adapted from McKinsey — evaluation, structured pilot testing, and scaling to enterprise — the Navy is inviting startups into the fold with fewer bureaucratic hurdles. This new “Innovation Adoption Kit” is designed to bridge the so-called “Valley of Death,” a stage in the innovation pipeline where promising tech often fails to make it from prototype to deployment.

One example of success under this new framework is the partnership with Via, a Somerville-based cybersecurity startup. The Navy moved from issuing a request for proposal to launching a pilot with Via in under six months — a dramatic shift from past government timelines. Via’s decentralized security infrastructure helps protect sensitive digital identities without relying on single, easily compromised data centers. The U.S. Air Force is also among its clients.

Fanelli’s approach is rooted in real operational need. Rather than simply chasing buzzwords, the Navy is measuring impact through specific, practical metrics: time saved, operational resilience, cost per user, adaptability, and user experience. A pilot project aboard an aircraft carrier that introduced improved networking infrastructure saved 5,000 sailor hours in just one month. Another startup used robotic process automation to eliminate a two-year invoice backlog in under two weeks. These tangible results are changing perceptions both inside the Navy and within the startup ecosystem.

Areas where the Navy is actively seeking private-sector solutions include advanced AI, alternative GPS technologies, and legacy system modernization. AI adoption, Fanelli noted, is moving beyond text generation into more autonomous and agent-driven solutions for tasks like personnel onboarding and real-time ship operations. Meanwhile, alternative precision navigation and timing tools are being rapidly integrated into unmanned systems as a backup to GPS. Outdated technologies like air traffic control systems and shipboard hardware are also slated for upgrades — opportunities ripe for startups offering adaptable, modern software and hardware solutions.

Though Fanelli declined to reveal exact budget figures, he admitted that only a small portion of the Navy’s technology funding currently goes to emerging and commercial tech vendors. He expects that to change significantly as the military becomes more reliant on AI and software-defined infrastructure. One major hurdle, however, remains: budget cycles. Even when pilot projects succeed, funding delays can stall implementation and frustrate both military users and startup investors. In some cases, funding isn’t available unless a new technology replaces an older one — a zero-sum equation that makes transitioning to newer systems even more difficult.

Fanelli, who was once a scholarship cadet in the Air Force but disqualified due to a medical condition, chose to join the Navy out of a deep desire to serve. With a career that spans DARPA, intelligence, and open-source technology, he brings a broad perspective to his current mission: remaking how the Navy thinks about innovation and partnerships.

Despite political shifts and administrative changes, Fanelli believes the current national focus on domestic manufacturing and resilience aligns well with the Navy’s innovation goals. He pointed to efforts like digital twins, additive manufacturing, and on-site production as examples of how the service is working to minimize supply chain vulnerabilities while boosting technological self-sufficiency.

Silicon Valley, long wary of government entanglements, is beginning to warm up to the opportunity. Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth recently remarked that there’s a deeper patriotic streak in the tech world than many assume — and that sentiment appears to be growing. The Defense Innovation Unit recently saw nearly 100 submissions for a niche cybersecurity challenge, many from first-time Department of Defense participants who saw a real-world need and a clear path to implementation.

Fanelli is optimistic that this changing tide will draw even more startups into the fold. His message is simple: if your technology can help solve a critical problem, the Navy wants to hear from you. In his words, “I would invite anyone who wants to serve the greater mission from a solution perspective to lean in and to join us in this journey.”

The post U.S. Navy Accelerates Tech Partnerships with Startups in a Bid to Modernize and Innovate Faster appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

What Is Impersonation in Cybersecurity? Definition, Risks & Prevention

In an age where digital identity is as valuable as currency, impersonation has emerged as one of the most dangerous threats in cybersecurity. From duping unsuspecting users into handing over credentials to orchestrating complex phishing campaigns, impersonation attacks have evolved with alarming sophistication. But what is impersonation in cybersecurity, and why should businesses and individuals alike be deeply concerned?

At its core, impersonation in cybersecurity refers to any malicious activity where an attacker pretends to be someone they are not. This could involve faking an email address, mimicking a trusted vendor, or even using deepfake videos to mislead targets. The goal is typically to gain unauthorized access, exfiltrate data, or install malware through deceptive means.

The damage caused by such tactics is far-reaching. Beyond financial losses, these attacks undermine trust in digital communication and can have severe reputational consequences. For example, a single CEO fraud email impersonating a company executive can result in millions of dollars in fraudulent wire transfers.

Understanding what impersonation is in cybersecurity is the first step in protecting yourself and your organization. This article dives deep into the types of impersonation, how attackers execute these schemes, the psychological manipulation behind them, and most importantly, the best practices to detect and prevent them. By the end, you’ll have a comprehensive roadmap to identify impersonation threats and build a resilient cyber defense strategy.

What is impersonation in cybersecurity?                                                                                                         It’s a tactic where attackers pose as trusted individuals or systems to deceive victims into revealing sensitive data or performing harmful actions. This includes email spoofing, fake login pages, or cloned social profiles. Impersonation is one of the most common and dangerous threats online today.

The Rise of Identity Deception in the Digital Age

Impersonation in cybersecurity involves the act of a malicious actor pretending to be a legitimate user, service, or trusted entity to deceive others. This form of deception is often the first step in a more extensive social engineering campaign, and its success hinges on the victim’s belief in the attacker’s false identity.

This tactic can be executed in many ways. A hacker might mimic a company’s email domain to request sensitive information from employees. Or, a scammer might create a fake website that closely resembles a legitimate one to harvest login credentials. In some advanced cases, attackers use machine learning to create deepfake videos and audio, simulating real people.

Cybercriminals use impersonation to breach networks, steal credentials, gain financial information, or manipulate targets into taking harmful actions. This makes impersonation attacks not only a technical challenge but a psychological one. Users often fall victim because the communication appears trustworthy on the surface.

While the methods used may differ, the intention remains consistent: to mislead. By understanding what impersonation is in cybersecurity and how it operates, we gain a better grasp of the threat landscape. Cybersecurity professionals must stay ahead of evolving impersonation strategies by combining technical defenses with user education and awareness.

The increasing use of cloud services, remote communication tools, and digital identities has only made impersonation easier for attackers. As a result, developing strategies to recognize and respond to these threats is now more critical than ever for businesses and users.

How Do Hackers Perform Cyber Impersonation Attacks?

Cyber impersonation attacks are evolving rapidly, using deception to exploit trust. Below are the most common techniques hackers use to carry out these threats.

Email Spoofing and Phishing

Hackers frequently use email spoofing to manipulate the “From” field in an email, making it appear as though the message came from a trusted source. These emails often contain malicious links or attachments, tricking recipients into revealing passwords, financial data, or installing malware. Phishing remains one of the most effective methods of impersonation due to its simplicity and scalability.

Business Email Compromise (BEC)

In BEC attacks, cybercriminals impersonate high-level executives or trusted vendors to deceive employees. The attacker may send an urgent request to transfer funds or share sensitive files. Because the emails are crafted to mimic internal communication styles, they often bypass suspicion, resulting in major financial and data losses.

Social Media Cloning

Impersonators duplicate an individual’s social media profile to establish connections with the victim’s friends, colleagues, or clients. Once trust is gained, attackers may request money, extract private information, or spread malware. The visual authenticity of cloned accounts makes this tactic dangerously convincing.

Fake Websites and Login Portals

By creating counterfeit websites that closely resemble real ones, attackers trick users into submitting login credentials or payment details. These phishing sites are commonly used in banking, e-commerce, and email scams, where a minor visual difference can lead to significant compromise.

Deepfakes and AI-Generated Media

Advanced attackers now employ artificial intelligence to produce hyper-realistic audio or video deepfakes. These are used to impersonate CEOs, government officials, or public figures, making phone calls or video messages appear legitimate. This emerging threat adds a complex layer to digital impersonation strategies.

Types of Impersonation in Cybersecurity

Impersonation in cybersecurity manifests in several distinct ways, each targeting the victim’s sense of trust and urgency. These attacks are designed to appear credible and often exploit well-known communication platforms to increase their chances of success.

Email Impersonation
Cybercriminals frequently send spoofed emails that appear to originate from company executives or trusted vendors. These messages often request sensitive data, payment transfers, or login credentials, leveraging authority to compel action.
Phone Spoofing (Vishing)
In this tactic, attackers manipulate the caller ID to appear as legitimate institutions like banks, government agencies, or IT support. Victims are often pressured into revealing personal or financial information over the phone.
Social Media Impersonation
Hackers create fake social media profiles by cloning real accounts. They then use these impersonated profiles to trick followers into clicking malicious links, donating money, or divulging private details.
Malware-Laced Messaging Apps
Attackers use apps like WhatsApp or Telegram to impersonate known contacts. They share links or attachments that contain malware, which, once clicked, can compromise the device or network.
Tech Support Scams
Impersonators claim to be tech support from reputable companies. They often contact users directly, offering to “fix” issues while secretly installing malware or stealing data during remote access sessions.Why Impersonation Attacks Are Increasing Rapidly

Impersonation threats are growing because digital trust is easier to exploit than systems. With the rise of AI tools, automation, and social media, cybercriminals can now reach targets at scale with greater sophistication.

Many platforms do not verify identity thoroughly. A scammer can set up a fraudulent domain or clone a social profile in minutes. Combined with access to public data breaches, impersonation becomes even more accessible.

Also, work-from-home environments have led to more reliance on digital communication. This detachment from in-person confirmation makes users more susceptible to believing fake identities.

Attackers also thrive on the urgency. Impersonation tactics often use emotional triggers like fear or authority. When someone thinks the CEO is asking for a bank transfer or a government agency is threatening legal action, they may act quickly without verifying.

These factors, combined with weak security awareness, make impersonation attacks highly profitable. The cybercriminal doesn’t even need to breach a firewall—they just need to fool a person.

How to Defend Against Impersonation Threats in the Workplace

Preventing impersonation attacks requires a mix of employee awareness, technical safeguards, and continuous monitoring. Here are the most effective ways to defend against them.

Educate Employees About Threats

Training staff to recognize suspicious emails, messages, and requests is the first line of defense.

Implement Email Authentication Protocols

Use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prevent email spoofing and protect your domain.

Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

Even if credentials are stolen, MFA adds another layer that prevents unauthorized access.

Monitor Unusual Behavior

User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) can flag activity that deviates from normal patterns.

Verify Identities in Sensitive Transactions

Implement call-back verification processes or second-person approval for wire transfers.

Use Anti-Impersonation Software

Employ AI-powered threat detection tools that scan for impersonation attempts across emails and platforms.

Conclusion

Impersonation is no longer a low-level scam but a central tactic in sophisticated cyber campaigns. As we’ve explored, knowing what impersonation is in cybersecurity provides the foundation for recognizing and responding to these threats. From email spoofing to deepfakes, attackers have a wide arsenal at their disposal. But with awareness, proper training, and the right technology, individuals and organizations can build robust defenses.

FAQs

What is impersonation in cybersecurity?

It refers to cybercriminals pretending to be trusted individuals, services, or systems to trick users into revealing sensitive information or performing harmful actions.

How can I tell if an email is impersonated?

Look for inconsistencies in the sender’s address, poor grammar or formatting, suspicious links, and verify any urgent requests through a separate, trusted communication channel.

Can impersonation attacks be stopped completely?

While no system is 100% foolproof, you can significantly reduce impersonation risks through multi-layered security strategies, regular employee training, and real-time monitoring tools.

What tools can detect impersonation attempts?

Tools like AI-driven email filters, anti-phishing solutions, and user behavior analytics platforms can help detect and block impersonation attempts before damage occurs.

Are social media impersonation attacks common?

Yes, they are increasingly common, especially targeting businesses, influencers, and public figures to carry out scams, spread misinformation, or harvest private data.

The post What Is Impersonation in Cybersecurity? Definition, Risks & Prevention appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

What Makes a Good Cyber Security Professional: Top Skills & Traits

Cyber threats are everywhere—and growing smarter by the second. In a world where one breach can ruin a business, what makes a good cybersecurity professional isn’t just technical know-how—it’s a potent mix of instincts, intelligence, and integrity.

These professionals are more than system guardians—they’re digital warriors trained to outsmart hackers, protect sensitive data, and stay ahead of evolving threats. They possess the perfect blend of analytical thinking, technical mastery, ethical decision-making, and relentless curiosity.

Whether you’re planning a cybersecurity career or hiring someone to safeguard your organization, understanding what makes a good cybersecurity professional is no longer optional—it’s essential.

In this guide, we break down the traits, certifications, skills, and mindsets that define top-tier cyber experts. You’ll discover the “why,” “how,” and “when” behind cybersecurity success—and learn what truly separates average defenders from elite professionals.

Get ready to explore what it takes to become a standout cybersecurity professional in a digital age that never sleeps.

What makes a good cyber security professional?
A good cybersecurity professional combines technical expertise, problem-solving skills, ethical responsibility, and strong communication skills. They stay updated on emerging threats, act proactively, and think like attackers to build resilient defenses. Certifications, curiosity, and adaptability also set them apart in this ever-evolving field.

The Building Blocks of Cyber Security Excellence

Excelling in cybersecurity demands far more than just technical proficiency. It requires a sharp mindset, unwavering focus, and a genuine curiosity about how systems work—and how they can be breached. At the heart of what makes a good cybersecurity professional is the ability to think several steps ahead. These experts don’t just respond to threats—they predict and prevent them.

Top cybersecurity professionals are critical thinkers who remain composed and level-headed under pressure. They thrive in high-stakes situations such as data breaches or ransomware attacks, making decisions with clarity and speed. Their curiosity often drives them to research late into the night, uncovering new vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.

While technical expertise is foundational, it’s only one part of the puzzle. A good cybersecurity professional must also clearly communicate risks to non-technical stakeholders, bridging the gap between IT and business. These qualities are often what earn someone a trustworthiness and reliability within their organization.

Ultimately, what makes a good cybersecurity professional is their commitment to continuous learning, proactive defense, and ethical responsibility. They’re not just reacting to the digital world—they’re actively securing its future.

Why Does Cybersecurity Require More Than Just Technical Skills?

Many assume that cybersecurity is all about coding, firewalls, and penetration testing. But in reality, what makes a good cybersecurity professional goes well beyond technical knowledge. Soft skills, strategic thinking, and ethical decision-making are just as vital in today’s cybersecurity roles.

The Importance of Communication and Collaboration

Cybersecurity professionals don’t work in silos. They must communicate technical risks clearly to executives, legal teams, and non-technical departments. This requires the ability to translate complex issues into business language and collaborate effectively across departments to create secure environments.

Risk Management & Strategic Thinking

A good cybersecurity professional doesn’t just react to threats—they evaluate risk strategically. Understanding which vulnerabilities could disrupt core business functions allows them to prioritize and respond with impact-driven decisions.

Ethical Responsibility and Trust

Handling sensitive information means working with integrity. Cybersecurity experts are trusted to maintain confidentiality and comply with laws and ethical standards, which play a massive role in shaping a company’s reputation and resilience.

Decision-Making Under Pressure

In crises—such as data breaches or malware outbreaks—quick, rational thinking becomes crucial. A cybersecurity professional must remain calm, assess the threat, and respond efficiently to protect data and infrastructure. These traits truly define professional excellence.

What Are the Key Skills That Define a Cybersecurity Expert?

When it comes to what makes a good cybersecurity professional, technical skills play a crucial role. Beyond soft skills and ethics, these professionals need hands-on expertise across various domains. Below are the essential skills that define a top-tier cybersecurity expert:

Network Security Knowledge: Understanding how systems interact and identifying weak points in network communication is fundamental to defense.

Incident Response Planning: Professionals must know how to detect, respond to, and recover from security breaches in real-time.

SIEM & Monitoring Tools: Experience with platforms such as Splunk, QRadar, or ArcSight is crucial for analyzing logs and identifying threats.

Coding & Scripting Abilities: Skills in Python, Bash, or PowerShell help automate repetitive tasks and identify vulnerabilities more efficiently.

Penetration Testing Mindset: Ethical hacking and red teaming allow professionals to test defenses and strengthen weak spots before attackers strike.

Cloud Security Expertise: As businesses move to the cloud, knowledge of AWS, Azure, or GCP security settings is indispensable.

These skills form the technical foundation of what makes a good cybersecurity professional today.

When Should You Start Building Cybersecurity Skills?

Becoming a cybersecurity expert doesn’t happen overnight. It takes commitment, early exposure, and hands-on practice. If you’re wondering what makes a good cybersecurity professional, the journey often starts long before the first job offer. Here’s when and how to begin:

During Formal Education: Start as early as high school or college by pursuing degrees in computer science, cybersecurity, or IT-related fields.

With Online Courses and Certifications: Enroll in programs like CompTIA Security+, CEH, or CISSP to gain foundational and specialized knowledge.

By Engaging with Cybersecurity Communities: Join forums, Discord groups, or Reddit threads to network, ask questions, and stay informed about industry developments.

Through Internships or Entry-Level Jobs: Begin in roles such as IT support or system administration to gain technical experience and exposure to real-world scenarios.

By Practicing in Labs and Simulations: Use platforms like Hack The Box or TryHackMe to test your skills in simulated attack and defense environments.

Starting early and being consistent are significant parts of what makes a good cybersecurity professional.

How Do You Keep Up in the Fast-Changing Cybersecurity World?

The cybersecurity landscape evolves at a rapid pace, and staying ahead of threats is a key aspect of what makes a good cybersecurity professional. Continuous learning, community engagement, and adaptability are non-negotiable for success.

Continuous Learning and Certifications

Earning certifications like CISSP, OSCP, or GIAC is a great way to validate your expertise. These credentials demonstrate your commitment to staying current with the industry and mastering the latest tools and techniques.

Following Industry News and Threat Feeds

Reading cybersecurity blogs, subscribing to threat intelligence platforms, and utilizing tools like Feedly enable professionals to stay informed about trends, vulnerabilities, and attack patterns before they become widespread.

Participation in CTFs and Ethical Hacking

Events like Capture the Flag (CTF) and red team/blue team competitions provide hands-on experience under pressure. These gamified challenges not only build confidence but also develop practical skills.

Developing a Learning Routine

Setting aside regular time each week to explore new tools, test labs, or read white papers helps maintain a sharp edge in your skill set.

Networking with Professionals

Joining LinkedIn groups, Discord communities, or attending industry conferences like DEFCON allows you to learn from peers, gain mentorship, and share insights.

Together, these habits reinforce what makes a good cybersecurity professional truly exceptional in a constantly shifting threat landscape.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, what makes a good cyber security professional goes far beyond certifications or technical jargon. It’s about being proactive, thinking critically, and navigating threats with both logic and integrity. A great cybersecurity expert anticipates problems before they arise, communicates clearly with both technical and non-technical teams, and upholds the highest ethical standards. 

These individuals are constantly learning, evolving, and sharpening their skills in response to a rapidly changing digital world. They don’t just defend systems—they strengthen them with every challenge they face. Whether you’re looking to build a cybersecurity career or hire someone to protect your infrastructure, these core traits define a true digital defender who’s prepared for anything the cyber world throws their way.

FAQ’s

What is the most essential skill for a cybersecurity professional?
While a range of skills is essential, critical thinking and the ability to anticipate threats are vital. These help professionals act proactively and neutralize risks early.

Do I need a degree to work in cybersecurity?
A degree can be helpful, but it’s not mandatory. Many employers prioritize hands-on experience, industry certifications, and demonstrated problem-solving ability over formal education.

How long does it take to become a cybersecurity expert?
It typically takes 2 to 5 years of consistent learning, certifications, and job experience to achieve an expert level, depending on your background and level of dedication.

Are certifications like CISSP or CEH worth it?
Yes, both are widely recognized in the industry. They validate your expertise, improve job prospects, and are often required for leadership or specialized roles.

Can cybersecurity be self-taught?
Absolutely. Many successful professionals are self-taught through online courses, labs, and real-world practice, proving skills without a traditional degree path.

The post What Makes a Good Cyber Security Professional: Top Skills & Traits appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

Aspora Secures $50 Million to Revolutionize Remittances and Banking for Indian Diaspora

Aspora, a rising fintech startup focused on streamlining financial services for non-resident Indians (NRIs), has secured $50 million in Series B funding, underscoring a growing demand for tailored banking and remittance solutions among India’s global diaspora. The investment was co-led by Sequoia and Greylock, with participation from Y Combinator, Hummingbird Ventures, and Quantum Light Ventures. This new round brings the company’s total funding to over $99 million and catapults its valuation to $500 million — a dramatic leap from the $150 million valuation recorded just four months ago.

A New Financial Lifeline for the Indian Diaspora

Formerly known as Vance, Aspora is building a verticalized financial ecosystem designed specifically for NRIs, starting with what founder and CEO Aaryaman Garg calls a “wedge product”: remittances. The startup aims to tackle a long-standing issue — the lack of personalized digital financial journeys for Indians living abroad.

“While multiple financial products for non-resident Indians exist, they don’t know about them because there is no digital journey for them,” said Garg. “They possibly use the same banking app as residents, which makes it harder for them to discover products catered towards them.”

India is the world’s leading remittance destination, receiving a staggering $118.7 billion in 2023–24 alone, according to data from the Reserve Bank of India. This figure is projected to reach $160 billion by 2029, signaling a huge market opportunity for fintech innovation.

Explosive Growth and Global Expansion

Aspora’s growth over the past year has been exponential. The startup has scaled its remittance volume from $400 million to $2 billion annually — a sixfold increase. This rapid expansion spurred investor confidence, leading to a previously undisclosed $35 million Series A round in December 2023. Since then, transaction volume has tripled, prompting even deeper financial commitments from backers.

Originally targeting the UK-India corridor, Aspora has expanded into several other remittance hotspots, including Europe and the United Arab Emirates. The company now sets its sights on launching operations in the United States — one of the largest remittance corridors to India — as early as next month. Plans are also underway to enter Canada, Singapore, and Australia by the end of 2025.

Aspora differentiates itself by offering a flat-fee remittance model with competitive exchange rates — rates the company markets as “Google rate” for their transparency and consumer familiarity, though they may not always reflect live market prices.

Beyond Remittances: A Full Financial Suite for NRIs

While remittances have been the initial driver of user acquisition, Aspora’s ambitions extend much further. The company is poised to roll out several new products over the next few months, transforming itself into a full-service financial platform for the Indian diaspora.

Bill Payments: This month, Aspora will launch a bill payment solution allowing NRIs to directly pay for household services in India, such as rent and utilities.

Foreign Currency Fixed Deposits: In July, the company plans to launch fixed deposit products that allow customers to park money in India in foreign currency, a rare and attractive proposition for wealth preservation.

Full-Stack NRI Banking Accounts: By year-end, Aspora intends to introduce digital-first NRI banking accounts. These accounts, which typically require days to open and often deter users due to bureaucratic friction, are being reimagined for a seamless experience. Many NRIs currently resort to using family members’ domestic accounts, potentially jeopardizing their tax and residency compliance. Aspora hopes to simplify this with a dedicated solution.

Family Care Services: A unique addition to its roadmap is a care platform for elderly parents in India, offering regular medical checkups, emergency services, and concierge support, aiming to provide peace of mind to NRIs supporting loved ones from afar.

Garg emphasizes that most NRIs are not just sending money home to support relatives — they are investing in their own financial futures. 80% of Aspora’s users send remittances to accounts they control, underlining the shift from family sustenance to wealth creation.

Competitive Landscape and Strategic Execution

Aspora operates in a competitive field that includes global heavyweights like Remitly and Wise, as well as India-born challenger Abound, a spinoff from Times Internet. But Sequoia’s Luciana Lixandru, a lead investor in both Series A and B rounds, believes Aspora’s unique approach sets it apart.

“Speed of execution, for me, is one of the main indicators in the early days of the future success of a company,” she said. “Aspora moves fast, but it is also very deliberate in building corridor by corridor, which is very important in financial services.”

By taking a phased, hyper-localized expansion approach — rather than scaling too broadly too quickly — Aspora is carefully navigating the complex regulatory and compliance landscape that governs cross-border financial services.

Why This Matters

For millions of Indians living abroad, managing finances across borders remains a cumbersome and often opaque process. Aspora’s digital-first, user-centric model aims to simplify that experience while also empowering users to invest, save, and care for family in India — all from one platform.

In doing so, the company not only taps into a massive and underserved market but also reflects broader shifts in how global diasporas engage with their home countries financially.

What’s Next for Aspora

The company’s immediate focus will be on executing its launch in the U.S. and introducing the new suite of financial tools. With its sights firmly set on becoming the go-to financial partner for NRIs, Aspora is rapidly transitioning from a niche remittance player into a global fintech force.

If execution remains on pace, Aspora could redefine how the Indian diaspora manages money, not just sending it, but strategically growing and protecting it as well.

User Intent Summary:

What happened? Aspora raised $50 million in Series B funding, bringing its valuation to $500 million and expanding its global reach.

Why does it matter? The funding supports Aspora’s mission to build a holistic financial platform for NRIs, addressing remittances, investments, banking, and elder care.

What’s next? Aspora is launching in the U.S., followed by rollouts in Canada, Singapore, and Australia, and introducing new banking and investment products in 2025.

Let me know if you want a version of this article for publication, a shortened summary for a press release, or SEO optimization.

The post Aspora Secures $50 Million to Revolutionize Remittances and Banking for Indian Diaspora appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

What is RTOS in Cyber Security? Real-Time Defense for Digital Threats

What is RTOS in cybersecurity? As the demand for faster, more secure, and real-time computing grows, Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOS) have become crucial in embedded systems, IoT devices, and military applications. These systems power everything from pacemakers and automotive controls to drones and industrial robotics. In the context of cybersecurity, RTOS plays a central role in managing the timely, secure execution of tasks while protecting sensitive data from intrusion.

RTOS ensures that tasks execute within strict time limits and with high predictability, making it ideal for systems where delay could result in catastrophic failure. Because these systems are often deployed in mission-critical infrastructures, their cybersecurity architecture must be both robust and adaptive. This article explores what RTOS is in cybersecurity, its architecture, the security implications of real-time processing, and how developers can secure RTOS-based systems from vulnerabilities.

From deterministic scheduling to memory isolation, we will dive into why RTOS security matters more than ever in today’s interconnected digital landscape.

What is RTOS in cybersecurity?                                                                                                     It refers to a Real-Time Operating System that ensures time-critical processes execute securely and predictably. In cybersecurity, RTOS is vital for protecting embedded systems and IoT devices in high-stakes environments like healthcare, automotive, and aerospace.

How RTOS Enhances Security in Mission-Critical Applications

Real-Time Operating Systems are specially designed to manage tasks with precise timing requirements. These systems are built to ensure that high-priority operations are executed immediately, without delays caused by multitasking, making them ideal for environments where timing is critical to security.

In cybersecurity, RTOS is essential because it governs embedded systems and devices that often operate in the background of daily life. Think of insulin pumps, ABS brakes, or unmanned aircraft; these systems must react in milliseconds. A delay or intrusion can have disastrous consequences. That’s why understanding what RTOS is in cybersecurity is not just important—it’s essential.

One of the defining features of RTOS is deterministic behavior. It means that you can predict exactly how the system will react to a specific event within a strict timeframe. That predictability is a major asset in cybersecurity because it allows developers to foresee vulnerabilities and build more secure defenses.

Another aspect of RTOS security is memory management. Unlike general-purpose operating systems, an RTOS offers real-time memory protection to ensure critical tasks do not interfere with each other. This is key to preventing attacks like buffer overflows or memory corruption.

Furthermore, the small footprint of RTOS allows it to run on low-resource devices with limited attack surfaces. These minimalistic architectures reduce the number of components hackers can exploit, making RTOS-based devices inherently more secure. But they also need proper configuration and maintenance.

RTOS security also requires compliance with specific standards like MISRA or DO-178C, depending on the industry. By conforming to these certifications, organizations can ensure that RTOS implementations are built with safety and security as a priority.

How Does RTOS Architecture Enhance Cybersecurity?

RTOS architecture is purpose-built for reliability, precision, and security, making it ideal for safeguarding embedded systems in real-time environments.

Real-Time Task Scheduling and Isolation

RTOS uses preemptive, priority-based scheduling. This allows higher-priority tasks (like emergency braking systems) to interrupt lower-priority ones, ensuring mission-critical actions are always addressed promptly. Task isolation ensures that no single failure compromises the entire system.

Memory Management and Access Control

One of the biggest benefits of RTOS is deterministic memory management. Modern RTOS platforms use MMU/MPU features to create secure memory zones. This separation prevents attacks like stack smashing or unauthorized data access.

Inter-Process Communication (IPC) Security

RTOS supports secure message queues, semaphores, and mailboxes for task communication. These mechanisms are monitored for anomalies, helping detect or prevent unauthorized access or privilege escalation.

Secure Boot and Trusted Execution

RTOS-based devices often utilize secure boot mechanisms to ensure the system starts with verified, unaltered firmware. Combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), this guarantees that core components haven’t been tampered with.

Lightweight Codebase and Reduced Attack Surface

Unlike general-purpose OSes, RTOS systems are stripped down, reducing unnecessary modules and services. This minimalist design limits vulnerabilities and simplifies patch management.

Advantages of RTOS in Cyber Security

Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOS) provide several built-in advantages that make them highly effective for securing embedded and mission-critical systems. Their architecture is purpose-built for environments where timing, security, and reliability are non-negotiable.

Deterministic Performance
RTOS ensures tasks are executed with consistent timing, which is critical in detecting and responding to cyber threats in real time. This predictability reduces the risk of system delays or failures during crucial operations.
Minimal Latency
With ultra-low response times, RTOS supports applications that demand immediate action, such as emergency response systems, medical devices, or military-grade equipment.
Memory Protection
Built-in memory management prevents unauthorized access and common threats like buffer overflows, safeguarding sensitive code and data from exploitation.
Low Resource Consumption
RTOS is optimized for devices with limited processing power and memory, allowing secure operation even in resource-constrained environments like IoT or automotive sensors.
Secure APIs and IPC Mechanisms
RTOS uses trusted communication protocols and secure inter-process communication to reduce the chance of breaches during data transfer between system modules.
Certifications and Compliance
Many RTOS options are built to meet strict industry standards such as ISO 26262, IEC 61508, or DO-178C, offering a framework for security assurance and regulatory compliance.

These features make RTOS an essential layer of defense in today’s cyber landscape.

Challenges in Securing RTOS-Based Systems

While RTOS platforms offer significant benefits for cybersecurity, securing these systems presents unique challenges. Many RTOS-based environments prioritize speed and reliability over security during the initial design, which can lead to vulnerabilities if not addressed properly.

Limited Security Updates
In regulated sectors like healthcare and manufacturing, devices may run on outdated RTOS versions for years. Strict certification requirements make updating software a complex, delayed process, leaving systems exposed to evolving threats.
Vendor Lock-In
Proprietary RTOS solutions often limit user access to source code and control over security patches. This dependence on vendors reduces flexibility and visibility, making it harder to implement custom security measures or react quickly to threats.
Inadequate Developer Awareness
Many developers working with RTOS lack specific training in secure configurations, leaving systems vulnerable to misconfigurations and exploitable design flaws.
Legacy System Dependence
Older RTOS deployments still power essential infrastructure. These legacy systems often lack support for modern encryption, access control, or patch management, making them prime targets for attackers.
Exposed Network Interfaces
Embedded devices with network capabilities may operate without encryption or firewall protection, increasing the risk of remote attacks through open ports or insecure protocols.

Securing RTOS systems requires a layered, proactive strategy that doesn’t sacrifice performance for protection.

How to Secure Your RTOS-Driven Systems Against Cyber Threats

Securing Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOS) is critical for protecting embedded systems from evolving cyber threats. Below are key strategies to harden RTOS environments effectively.

Prioritize Secure Boot Mechanisms 

One of the most effective ways to protect an RTOS environment is by implementing secure boot protocols. This process uses cryptographic verification during system startup to confirm the authenticity and integrity of the firmware. If any unauthorized changes are detected, the boot process is halted, preventing the execution of malicious code.

Harden Inter-Process Communications (IPC) 

RTOS environments rely on communication between tasks and threads, making IPC a potential target for attackers. Secure this layer by encrypting all IPC channels and ensuring that buffer overflows or unauthorized message injections are prevented through rigorous validation and boundary checks.

Conduct Threat Modeling and Risk Assessments 

Before deploying an RTOS-driven device, perform a comprehensive threat model. Identify critical tasks, exposed interfaces, and sensitive data flows. Use this information to build layered security defenses tailored to your application’s risk profile.

Implement Runtime Security Monitoring 

Incorporate real-time security tools such as watchdog timers, memory integrity checkers, and anomaly detection algorithms. These components help detect and respond to suspicious behavior during system operation, reducing the window of exposure.

Update Firmware Securely 

Establish a secure firmware update mechanism, preferably over-the-air (OTA), that includes encryption and digital signature validation. Ensure that only authenticated, integrity-checked updates can be applied to the system.

Conclusion

What RTOS is in cybersecurity is key to building and protecting the backbone of modern infrastructure. RTOS-based systems run our cars, control medical devices, and power national defense assets. Their secure and deterministic design makes them ideal for real-time security applications, but they must be implemented thoughtfully.

By emphasizing minimalism, predictability, and strict task control, RTOS helps create a foundation for robust cyber defenses. As cyber threats evolve, developers and security professionals must prioritize real-time protections and remain vigilant against emerging attack vectors. In doing so, we not only safeguard critical systems but also uphold public safety.

FAQ’s

What is RTOS in cybersecurity? 

RTOS in cybersecurity refers to a Real-Time Operating System that enables deterministic task execution, essential for maintaining security in embedded or mission-critical environments.

Why is RTOS used in embedded cybersecurity?

RTOS ensures predictable timing, memory isolation, and faster response times—key features for protecting embedded systems like drones, pacemakers, and industrial controllers.

Can RTOS be hacked? 

Yes, RTOS can be hacked if not secured properly. Common vulnerabilities include unpatched firmware, insecure inter-process communication, and weak encryption protocols.

How is RTOS different from a general OS in terms of security?

RTOS provides deterministic task management, lean architecture, and smaller codebases, reducing potential attack surfaces compared to general-purpose operating systems.

What industries rely on RTOS for cybersecurity? 

Aerospace, automotive, defense, healthcare, and industrial automation sectors depend on RTOS to secure systems where safety, reliability, and timing are critical.

The post What is RTOS in Cyber Security? Real-Time Defense for Digital Threats appeared first on DXG Tech USA.

New York Passes Groundbreaking AI Safety Bill Aimed at Preventing Catastrophic Disasters

New York state lawmakers have approved the RAISE Act, a landmark bill designed to prevent advanced artificial intelligence systems from causing large-scale disasters. Passed on Thursday, the legislation targets so-called “frontier AI models” — powerful systems developed by companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic — and seeks to impose mandatory transparency and safety reporting requirements for models deployed in New York and trained with massive computing power.

The bill is a significant victory for the AI safety movement, whose calls for stricter oversight have often been drowned out by the tech industry’s push for innovation at speed. Advocates such as Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio have endorsed the RAISE Act as a critical step toward ensuring public safety as artificial intelligence evolves.

The bill’s provisions are narrow but potent. It applies only to developers whose models are trained using more than $100 million in computing resources — a threshold designed to exclude startups and academic labs — and made available to New York residents. Should these companies fail to comply with the law’s safety obligations, they could face civil penalties of up to $30 million, enforced by the state’s attorney general.

If signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul, the RAISE Act would require qualifying companies to produce detailed safety and security documentation for their AI models. It would also obligate them to disclose any significant safety incidents, including those involving malicious actors stealing AI technology or systems behaving unpredictably. These requirements mark the first state-level legal framework in the U.S. focused specifically on regulating advanced AI systems.

The bill avoids some of the more contentious elements of other proposals, notably California’s SB 1047, which was vetoed earlier this year. Unlike SB 1047, New York’s legislation does not require AI developers to include a “kill switch” or hold them accountable for harms caused after post-training modifications. It also steers clear of regulating small companies and university labs — a key criticism of California’s effort.

According to Senator Andrew Gounardes, a co-sponsor of the bill, the legislation was crafted with precision to protect innovation while mitigating worst-case AI scenarios. “The window to put in place guardrails is rapidly shrinking given how fast this technology is evolving,” Gounardes said. “The people who know AI the best say these risks are incredibly likely. That’s alarming.”

Still, the tech industry has mounted considerable opposition. Investors and venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz have labeled the bill counterproductive and harmful to U.S. competitiveness in AI. Anjney Midha, a general partner at the firm, described the measure on X as “yet another stupid, stupid state-level AI bill.” Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, while refraining from issuing a formal position, expressed concern over the bill’s broad language and its potential impact on smaller companies, though the bill is not designed to regulate them.

New York State Assemblymember Alex Bores, who co-sponsored the legislation, dismissed the industry’s reaction as overblown. He emphasized that the regulatory burden is light and that no economic rationale supports withholding AI products from New York. “I don’t want to underestimate the political pettiness that might happen, but I am very confident that there is no economic reason for [AI companies] to not make their models available in New York,” Bores said.

Critics have pointed to Europe’s strict tech regulations — which have prompted some AI developers to withhold their products from the region — as a cautionary example. However, supporters of the RAISE Act argue that New York’s economic significance, with the third-largest GDP of any U.S. state, makes it highly unlikely that companies would risk withdrawing from such a large market.

The bill now awaits Governor Hochul’s decision. She can sign it into law, send it back for revisions, or issue a veto. If enacted, New York would become the first U.S. state to codify AI safety standards of this magnitude, potentially setting a template for other jurisdictions seeking to balance innovation with public protection.

In an era where AI technologies are rapidly reshaping industries and societies, the RAISE Act may be a pivotal early move in defining how — and how much — governments should regulate artificial intelligence. Whether other states or federal lawmakers will follow remains an open question.

The post New York Passes Groundbreaking AI Safety Bill Aimed at Preventing Catastrophic Disasters appeared first on DXG Tech USA.