مهاتير محمد's Blog, page 39

EVERYTHING IS FINE

1. Wednesday’s (November 4, 2015) paper reports that we are not facing a financial crisis and we are not going to go into financial crisis.

2. Eight prominent people including the PM tell us everything is fine.

3. Now if everything is fine why is there a need to arrest people for sabotaging the banking and financial system of the country? If they sabotage surely the banking and finance of Malaysia would not be fine. They would be dysfunctional.

4. But is it true that everything is hunky-dory; everything is fine. It can’t be! The banks and the financial system may be fine, but there are other indicators to show that the economy is not fine.

5. The Ringgit is down by 1 Ringgit to 4.3 to 1 USD. That’s a big drop in value and is bound to affect import business or loans in USD.

6. The stock market is down with big loss in market capitalisation. Again this would not be good for the economy.

7. The economic growth is lagging behind those of Indonesia and the Philippines. This is not normal. We use to leave them far behind us.

8. Everyone complains of increase in cost of living – toll rates up, rice prices up, GST, cost of production and services, transport, wages for servants, unemployment of graduates etc. etc are all high, reducing purchasing power of everyone.

9. There is a loss of confidence in the Government precipitated by the 1MDB scandal, the inability to service debts, disappearance of money, cash in the private a/c of PM, its subsequent disappearance, inability to explain 700 million USD, 2016 budget of monetary gifts, shrinking national resources, questionable use of EPF and KWAP funds, poor FDI etc.

10. So all cannot be well. Who is responsible? Cannot be some nonentity!! Must be the people who manage the economy, manage the country, the people with power and influence whose words and deeds can affect the economy.

11. In many countries, leaders resign when they fail; when their policies fail, when their cures fail. They also resign when some catastrophe assails their country e.g Australia and Romania. Of course they resign when they do badly in elections.

12. But not in Malaysia. Find other reasons. Find scapegoats. Blame the climate or whatever.

13. Poor Malaysia. No honour. No accountability. No pride. Just self-preservation.

VERSI BM

SEMUANYA BAIK

1. Akhbar Hari Rabu (4 November, 2015) melaporkan bahawa kita tidak menghadapi krisis kewangan dan kita tidak akan mengalami krisis kewangan.

2. Lapan orang terkenal termasuk PM memberitahu kita semua adalah baik.

3. Sekarang, jika sekiranya semuanya baik mengapa timbul keperluan untuk menangkap orang kerana mensabotaj sistem perbankan dan kewangan negara? Jika mereka mensabotaj sudah pasti perbankan dan kewangan Malaysia tidak akan baik. Ia akan menjadi disfungsi.

4. Tetapi adakah benar bahawa segala-galanya adalah hunky-dory; semuanya baik. Ini tidak mungkin! Bank-bank dan sistem kewangan mungkin baik, tetapi terdapat juga petunjuk-petunjuk lain yang menunjukkan bahawa ekonomi tidak baik.

5. Ringgit turun sebanyak 1 Ringgit kepada 4.3 pada 1 USD. Itu adalah satu penurunan nilai yang besar yang lambat laun akan menjejaskan perniagaan import atau pinjaman dalam USD.

6. Pasaran saham turun dengan kehilangan besar dalam pemodalan pasaran. Sekali lagi ini tidak baik untuk ekonomi.

7. Pertumbuhan ekonomi ketinggalan di belakang Indonesia dan Filipina. Ini tidak normal. Kita biasanya meninggalkan mereka jauh di belakang.

8. Semua orang mengadu kenaikan kos sara hidup – kadar tol naik, harga beras naik, GST, kos pengeluaran dan perkhidmatan, pengangkutan, gaji untuk pembantu rumah, pengangguran graduan dan lain-lain semuanya tinggi, mengurangkan kuasa beli semua orang.

9. Terdapat kehilangan keyakinan terhadap Kerajaan yang dicetuskan oleh skandal 1MDB, ketidakupayaan untuk membayar hutang, kehilangan wang, wang tunai dalam akaun peribadi PM, kemudian kelesapannya, kegagalan menjelaskan USD700 juta, bajet 2016 yang berunsur hadiah kewangan, pengecutan sumber-sumber negara, penggunaan dana KWSP dan KWAP yang boleh dipersoalkan, FDI yang sikit dan lain-lain.

10. Jadi semua tidak boleh dikatakan baik. Siapakah yang bertanggungjawab? Tidak mungkin satu entiti yang tidak wujud!! Mesti ada orang-orang yang menguruskan ekonomi, menguruskan negara, orang yang mempunyai kuasa dan pengaruh yang mana kata-kata dan perbuatan mereka boleh menjejas ekonomi.

11. Di kebanyakan negara, pemimpin meletakkan jawatan apabila mereka gagal; apabila dasar-dasar mereka gagal, apabila usaha pemulihan gagal. Mereka juga meletakkan jawatan apabila beberapa malapetaka melandai negara seperti Australia dan Romania. Sudah tentu mereka meletakkan jawatan apabila berprestasi teruk dalam pilihan raya.

12. Tetapi tidak di Malaysia. Mencari sebab-sebab lain. Mencari kambing hitam. Menyalahkan iklim atau apa sahaja.

13. Kesiannya Malaysia. Tiada kehormatan. Tiada akauntabiliti. Tiada kebanggaan. Hanya pemeliharaan diri sendiri.

SABOTAGE

1.​ I am confused by the AG’s statement that Dato Seri Khairuddin and Matthias Chang are being charged with sabotage of the nation’s banking and financial system.

2.​ I assume that their reports to the police authorities in the UK, Switzerland and Hong Kong, where the transactions took place, are the basis of these sabotage charges which if convicted may land them in jail for up to 15 years.

3.​ But the publication by the foreign press of the shenanigans in the investments by 1MDB came out long before Khairuddin reported. These news reports were not casual reports but were very detailed descriptions of what and who were involved. They were reporting on what is well known to the whole world.

4.​ Why were these newspaper reports not satisfactorily rebutted by 1MDB or the MOF since the impression created about Malaysia’s alleged abuses of the financial and banking systems could result ultimately in the loss of confidence in Malaysia’s political and economic health and its financials?

5.​ But had there been no 1MDB and no 42 billion Ringgit being borrowed, the press would not report nor would there be any police reports. Wouldn’t these press reports then be considered as sabotage?

6.​ 1MDB may sell the 60 Ringgit p.s.f. land that it bought from the Government at 5000% above the purchase price and repay the loans. But the fact remains that had 1MDB not been created, the huge sum of borrowed money would not have disappeared. For this 1MDB and those responsible must still be charged for abuses of the banking and financial system, repayment of the loans notwithstanding. The creators of 1MDB and the managers are the people who sabotaged this country, which before this had a good record for financial management and a sound banking system. They are the people who should be charged in court for sabotage of the Malaysian banking and financial systems. Since it was Najib who created 1MDB, borrow 42 billion Ringgit and invested the money and losing it, Najib should also be charged with sabotage.

7.​ Alternatively everyone, from the initial set-up of 1MDB to the borrowing, to the newspaper reporters and the reports to the police should all be charged with sabotage of Malaysia’s financial and banking systems.

VERSI BM

SABOTAJ

1. Saya keliru dengan kenyataan Peguam Negara bahawa Dato Seri Khairuddin dan Matthias Chang sedang didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem perbankan dan kewangan negara.

2. Saya menganggap bahawa laporan mereka kepada pihak berkuasa polis di UK, Switzerland dan Hong Kong, di mana urus niaga itu berlaku, adalah asas kepada caj-caj sabotaj yang jika disabitkan kesalahan boleh dikenakan hukuman penjara sehingga 15 tahun.

3. Tetapi penerbitan oleh akhbar asing mengenai tipu helah dalam pelaburan oleh 1MDB keluar lebih lama sebelum Khairuddin melaporkannya. Laporan-laporan berita ini bukan laporan sambil lewa tetapi penerangan yang sangat terperinci mengenai apa dan siapa yang terlibat. Mereka melaporkan apa yang sudah diketahui umum di seluruh dunia.

4. Kenapa laporan-laporan akhbar ini tidak disangkal dengan memuaskan oleh 1MDB atau MOF sedangkan tanggapan yang telah terujud mengenai pendakwaan penyalahgunaan sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia boleh akhirnya mengakibatkan kehilangan keyakinan terhadap kesihatan politik dan ekonomi Malaysia dan kewangannya?

5. Jika sekiranya tidak wujud 1MDB dan tiada RM42 bilion yang dipinjam, akhbar tidak akan melaporkan dan tidak akan ada laporan-laporan polis. Tidakkah laporan-laporan akhbar itu dianggap sebagai sabotaj?

6. 1MDB boleh menjual tanah yang dibeli dengan harga RM60 kaki persegi daripada Kerajaan pada kadar 5000% atas harga pembelian dan membayar balik pinjaman. Tetapi pada hakikat seandainya 1MDB tidak dicipta, jumlah besar wang yang dipinjam itu tidak akan lesap. Untuk ini 1MDB dan mereka yang bertanggungjawab masih perlu didakwa kerana penyalahgunaan sistem perbankan dan kewangan, tidak terkecuali juga pembayaran balik pinjaman. Pencipta 1MDB dan pengurus-pengurusnya adalah mereka yang mensabotaj negara ini, yang sebelum ini mempunyai rekod yang baik bagi pengurusan kewangan dan sistem perbankan yang kukuh. Mereka adalah orang-orang yang patut didakwa di mahkamah kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia. Oleh sebab Najiblah yang mencipta 1MDB, meminjam RM42 bilion, melabur wang itu dan menghilangkannya, Najib juga sepatutnya didakwa kerana sabotaj.

7. Atau sebagai alternatif semua orang, dari awal penubuhan 1MDB hingga pinjamannya, pemberita-pemberita akhbar dan laporan kepada polis, semuanya harus didakwa kerana sabotaj sistem kewangan dan perbankan Malaysia.

SEPARATION OF POWERS

1. The Deputy Prime Minister made reference to the separation of power when commenting on the statement of the Rulers over the need for investigations on 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account to be expedited. Is this a breach of the assumed separation of powers between the Rulers and the Government?

2. It is true that the Agong and the Malay Rulers are constitutional monarchs. But that does not mean that they are just rubber stamps to validate all the acts of their governments.

3. Sec 39 of the Federal Constitution (State constitutions follow closely that of the Federal constitution) states clearly that “The executive authority of the Federation shall be vested in the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and exercisable, subject to the provision of any Federal law and of the Second Schedule, by him or any Minister authorised by the Cabinet, but the Parliament may by law confer executive functions on other persons.

4. Section 40 states clearly that the Agong shall be entitled, at his request to any information available to the Cabinet.

5. These two sections clearly gives the Yang di-Pertuan Agong some executive roles.

6. Section 40 para (2) clearly states the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may act in his discretion in the performance of;

a) the appointment of the Prime Minister

b) the withholding of consent to a request for dissolution of Parliament

c) Federal law may make provisions for requiring the Agong to act after consultation with or on the recommendation of any person or body of persons

7. In the recent past we have seen Rulers rejecting nominees by the majority party for the office of Menteri Besar.

8. Should the Prime Minister request for the dissolution of Parliament, the Agong may reject.

9. Again we see here that the Agong and the Rulers may act on their own discretion. They may also consult and accept recommendations of any person or body of persons.

10. Obviously if petitions are made or there is a public clamour, the rulers may not have to listen only to the Cabinet.

11. Section 41 unequivocally states that the Yang di- Pertuan Agong shall be the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Federation. Clearly it is not just the privilege of wearing the uniform.

12. What is clear is that nothing in the Constitution talks about the separation of power between the Government and the Agong. In fact in many instances the Agong may act at his own discretion.

13. And the Agong may listen to other people than the Cabinet. This is only as it should be as failure of the Cabinet to address complaints by the people may require the Agong and the Rulers to urge the Government to respond.

14. In making their statement the Rulers were not in any way exceeding the provisions of the constitution. They were in fact abiding by the provisions of the constitution.

15. On the other hand the same cannot be said regarding the principle of the separation of powers between the legislative, the executive and the judiciary.

16. Currently the Prime Minister as head of the elected legislators is clearly not respecting these principles.

17. For example officers of the administration who were investigating 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit account have been transferred out to the Prime Minister’s Office, resulting in their stopping their work. Their replacements apparently was with approvals of the Prime Minister.

18. Officers of the MACC have been similarly treated, again resulting in the investigations being obstructed.

19. The Attorney-General, a member of the judicial establishment have been removed while he was carrying out the task of preparing the said case for the courts. In his place a judge was transferred to take over as AG. This is actually usurping the powers of the judiciary.

20. The AG was said to be sick, but he denied he was sick. As far as is known no medical certificate certifying that he was sick seem to have been issued.

21. All these are public knowledge. The Rulers may have heard and probably received petitions on the authoritarian disregard for the law and rules of Government.

22. The citizens of this country are the subjects of the Rulers. As Rulers they must care for the welfare of the people.

23. If in their opinion the Government should allow expeditious investigations to be carried over the issues of concern to the people and the country it is the duty of the Ruler to make known to the Government the dissatisfaction of the people over the issue and to ask for the matter to be attended to.

VERSI BM

PENGASINGAN KUASA

1. Timbalan Perdana Menteri merujuk kepada pengasingan kuasa apabila mengulas kenyataan Raja-Raja mengenai keperluan mempercepatkan penyiasatan ke atas 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib. Adakah ini satu pelanggaran pengasingan kuasa yang diandaikan antara Raja-Raja dan Kerajaan?

2. Ianya benar bahawa Agong dan Raja-Raja Melayu adalah raja berperlembagaan. Tetapi itu tidak bermakna bahawa mereka adalah pak turut semata-mata untuk mengesahkan semua tindakan Kerajaan.

3. Perkara 39 Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Perlembagaan Negeri mengikuti Perlembagaan Persekutuan) menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa “Kuasa Eksekutif Persekutuan hendaklah terletak kepada Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan, tertakluk kepada peruntukan mana-mana Undang-Undang Persekutuan dan peruntukan Jadual Kedua, dijalankan olehnya atau mana-mana Menteri yang diberi kuasa oleh Jemaah Menteri, tetapi Parlimen boleh, melalui undang-undang, memberikan fungsi eksekutif kepada individu lain.”

4. Perkara 40 menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa Agong adalah berhak, atas permintaannya, mendapat segala maklumat yang ada kepada Kabinet.

5. Kedua-dua bahagian ini jelas memberikan Yang di-Pertuan Agong beberapa peranan eksekutif.

6. Perkara 40 Peranggan (2) jelas menyatakan Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak menurut budi bicaranya dalam melaksanakan fungsi:

a) melantik seorang Perdana Menteri

b) tidak memperkenankan permintaan bagi pembubaran Parlimen

c) Undang-Undang Persekutuan boleh membuat peruntukan bagi mengkehendaki Agong bertindak selepas berunding dengan atau atas cadangan mana-mana individu atau sekumpulan individu.

7. Pada kebelakangan ini, kita melihat Raja-Raja telah menolak pencalonan oleh parti majoriti bagi jawatan Menteri Besar.

8. Sekiranya Perdana Menteri meminta untuk membubarkan Parlimen, Agong boleh menolak.

9. Sekali lagi kita lihat di sini bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja-Raja boleh bertindak atas budi bicara mereka sendiri. Mereka juga boleh berunding dan menerima cadangan daripada mana-mana individu atau kumpulan individu.

10. Jelas sekali jika petisyen telah dibuat atau ada suara desakan ramai, Raja-Raja tidak perlu hanya mendengar Kabinet.

11. Seksyen 41 tanpa ragu-ragu menyatakan bahawa Yang di-Pertuan Agong hendaklah menjadi Pemerintah Tertinggi Angkatan Tentera Persekutuan. Jelas sekali ini bukan sahaja hak istimewa untuk pemakaian seragam tersebut.

12. Apa yang jelas ialah tiada apa jua dalam Perlembagaan yang bercakap mengenai pengasingan kuasa di antara Kerajaan dan Agong. Malah dalam kebanyakkan keadaan, Yang di-Pertuan Agong boleh bertindak mengikut budi bicara sendiri.

13. Dan Agong boleh mendengar individu selain daripada Kabinet. Inilah sebenar hakikat yang diharapkan kerana kegagalan Kabinet untuk menangani aduan rakyat memerlukan Agong dan Raja-Raja menggesa Kerajaan untuk bertindak balas.

14. Dalam membuat kenyataan mereka, Raja-Raja tidak berada dalam keadaan melebihi had peruntukan Perlembagaan. Mereka sebenarnya mematuhi peruntukan perlembagaan.

15. Sebaliknya, yang sama tidak boleh dikatakan mengenai prinsip pengasingan kuasa antara perundangan, eksekutif dan kehakiman.

16. Pada masa ini, Perdana Menteri, sebagai ketua penggubal undang-undang yang dipilih, secara jelas tidak menghormati prinsip-prinsip ini.

17. Sebagai contoh pegawai-pegawai pentadbiran yang sedang menyiasat 1MDB dan akaun RM2.6 bilion telah dipindahkan ke Jabatan Perdana Menteri, menyebabkan pemberhentian kerja mereka. Penggantian mereka adalah ketara dengan kelulusan Perdana Menteri.

18. Pegawai-pegawai SPRM telah diberi layanan yang sama, sekali lagi menyebabkan siasatan terhalang.

19. Peguam Negara, seorang ahli badan kehakiman telah disingkirkan ketika beliau menjalankan tugas menyediakan kes tersebut untuk mahkamah. Di tempat beliau seorang hakim telah dipindahkan untuk mengambil alih tugas sebagai Peguam Negara. Ini sebenarnya perampasan kuasa badan kehakiman.

20. Peguam Negara dikatakan sakit, tetapi dia menafikan dirinya sakit. Setakat yang diketahui, tiada sijil perubatan yang mengesahkan bahawa dia sakit telah dikeluarkan.

21. Semua ini adalah pengetahuan umum. Raja-Raja mungkin pernah mendengar dan mungkin juga menerima petisyen mengenai sikap pengabaian secara authoritarian undang-undang dan peraturan Kerajaan.

22. Rakyat negara ini adalah subjek Raja-Raja. Sebagai Raja-Raja mereka perlu menjaga kebajikan rakyat.

23. Jika pada pendapat mereka, Kerajaan perlu membenarkan siasatan cepat dan cekap dijalankan ke atas isu-isu yang penting kepada rakyat dan negara ini, adalah kewajipan Raja untuk memaklumkan kepada Kerajaan rasa tidak puas hati rakyat dengan isu ini dan meminta perkara ini diberi perhatian.

1 MDB CLEARED

1. The Attorney Generals Chambers have cleared 1MDB of any wrongdoings with regard to the use of the funds approved by Bank Negara for foreign investments.

2. But Bank Negara is obviously not satisfied and appealed to the AG without any change in the report. Again the AG rejected the appeal.

3. We know of course that the AG is empowered to decide whether a case should go to court or not. The presumption is that the AG would appreciate and understand the seriousness or otherwise of the case before him, that he would appreciate the concern of the complainant or agency making the report, that if there is dissatisfaction the case should be judged in a court of law by a judge and if still dissatisfied that an appeal be allowed.

4. That should be the way. But it would seem that the AG has made the judgement, rejecting the case as having no merit for a hearing in a court of law. And when an appeal is made, the appeal is dismissed by him on grounds which are not clear. There is a lack of transparency here.

5. Is this the rule of law that this country is supposed to uphold? Is the AG higher than a judge, that his judgement is final and there can be no appeal?

6. In this particular case the people would like to know whether the Prime Minister is involved or not. By dismissing this case suspicions will remain in the minds of the people. In fact people are thinking that the decision of the AG may not be by the AG.

7. On the other hand we are seeing people being detained under a law supposedly meant for curbing terrorism.

8. In his speech when introducing Rang Undang-Undang Kesalahan Keselamatan (Security Offences (Special Measures) Act) 2012 the PM said activities which undermine parliamentary democracy is interpreted as an activity carried out by an individual or a group with the intention of toppling or undermining parliamentary democracy through violence and in contravention of the Constitution

9. The Security Offences law itself confines its application to security matters. It provides for the arrest and detention by a police officer any person whom he has reason to believe to be involved in security offences for twenty-four hours and for the purpose of investigations, detention can be extended for not more than twenty-eight days.

10. The arrests of Dato Khairuddin and his lawyer Matthias Chang have created fear among the people that reporting about wrongdoings of the Government and its officers constitute threats to security. Whistle-blowers which the Government is said to encourage, is now threatened with the danger of being accused of threatening the nations security.

11. With this the call by the Rulers for probes to be conducted fairly and in a transparent manner can no longer be achieved. There are literally dozens of people with knowledge of the wrongdoings in 1MDB who will not risk giving evidence or making accusations because they risk being detained and charged under the Security Offences Act.

12. We all know that the investigations into the 1MDB affairs and the USD 700 million in Dato Sri Najibs personal account has been jeopardised by the removal of the AG, the transfer of the MACC officers, the emasculation of the Public Accounts Committee and the implied threat against Bank Negara. Now lawyers for the defence can be questioned and detained.

13. These actions have intensified the lack of confidence and distrust of the people in the Government. Merely by stating the investigation is on going will not convince people that truth will prevail.

14. In the eyes of the world Malaysia has become a pariah state, a state where anyone can be hauled up and questioned by the police, detained and charged through abusing the laws of the country.

15. And the AGs Chambers will dismiss or disregard any report of wrongdoing that involves the Prime Minister.

16. Already the members of the Government are saying that no one, not even the Rulers may comment on obvious Government abuses of the laws of the country.

BM VERSION

1MDB DIBERSIHKAN

1. Jabatan Peguam Negara telah membersihkan 1MDB dari segala salah laku yang berkaitan dengan penggunaan dana yang diluluskan oleh Bank Negara untuk pelaburan asing.

2. Tetapi Bank Negara jelas tidak berpuas hati dan merayu kepada Peguam Negara tanpa apa-apa perubahan dalam laporan itu. Sekali lagi Peguam Negara menolak rayuan itu.

3. Kita tahu memangnya Peguam Negara diberi kuasa untuk membuat keputusan sama ada sesuatu kes perlu dibawa ke mahkamah atau tidak. Anggapannya adalah Peguam Negara akan menghargai dan memahami betapa serius atau sebaliknya kes yang dibawa kehadapannya, bahawa dia akan menghargai keprihatinan pengadu atau agensi yang membuat laporan itu, bahawa jika ada perasaan tidak puas hati kes itu patut dihakim dalam mahkamah undang-undang oleh seorang hakim dan jika masih tidak berpuas hati rayuan dibenarkan.

4. Itulah cara yang betul. Tetapi sekarang nampaknya Peguam Negara telah membuat penghakiman itu, menolak kes itu kerana tidak mempunyai merit untuk perbicaraan di mahkamah undang-undang. Dan apabila rayuan dibuat, rayuan itu ditolak oleh beliau atas alasan yang tidak jelas. Terdapat kekurangan ketelusan di sini.

5. Adakah ini kedaulatan undang-undang yang negara ini patut dukung? Adakah Peguam Negara lebih tinggi daripada seorang hakim, yang penghakimannya adalah muktamad dan tidak ada sebarang rayuan?

6. Dalam kes ini rakyat ingin tahu sama ada Perdana Menteri terlibat atau tidak. Dengan menolak kes ini syak wasangka akan kekal dalam minda rakyat. Malah orang berfikir bahawa keputusan Peguam Negara ini mungkin tidak dibuat oleh Peguam Negara.

7. Sebaliknya kita melihat orang sedang ditahan di bawah undang-undang yang kononnya bertujuan untuk membendung keganasan.

8. Dalam ucapannya ketika memperkenalkan Rang Undang-Undang Kesalahan Keselamatan (Security Offences Special Measures Act) 2012, PM berkata aktiviti yang menjejaskan demokrasi berparlimen ditafsirkan sebagai satu aktiviti yang dijalankan oleh individu atau kumpulan dengan niat untuk menjatuhkan atau melemahkan demokrasi berparlimen melalui kekerasan dan dengan melanggar Perlembagaan.

9. Undang-Undang Kesalahan Keselamatan itu sendiri membatasi pemakaiannya bagi hal-hal keselamatan. Ia memperuntukkan penangkapan dan penahanan oleh seorang pegawai polis mana-mana orang yang dia mempercayai terlibat dalam kesalahan keselamatan selama dua puluh empat jam dan bagi maksud penyiasatan, tahanan boleh dilanjutkan selama tempoh tidak melebihi dua puluh lapan hari.

10. Penangkapan Dato Khairuddin dan peguamnya Matthias Chang telah menimbulkan perasaan takut di kalangan orang ramai bahawa melaporkan tentang salah laku Kerajaan dan pegawai-pegawainya merupakan ancaman kepada keselamatan. Pemberi maklumat yang Kerajaan dikatakan menggalakkan, kini menghadapi bahaya dituduh mengancam keselamatan negara.

11. Dengan ini titah oleh Raja-Raja untuk pemeriksaan dijalankan secara adil dan telus tidak lagi boleh dicapai. Terdapat berpuluh-puluh orang yang mempunyai maklumat tentang salah laku dalam 1MDB yang tidak akan mengambil risiko memberi keterangan atau membuat tuduhan kerana mereka menghadapi risiko ditahan dan didakwa di bawah Akta Kesalahan Keselamatan.

12. Kita semua tahu bahawa siasatan dalam hal ehwal 1MDB dan USD 700 juta dalam akaun peribadi Dato’ Sri Najib telah tergendala oleh pemecatan Peguam Negara, pemindahan pegawai-pegawai SPRM, pengebirian Jawatankuasa Kira-kira Awam dan ancaman tersirat terhadap Bank Negara. Sekarang peguam pembelaan boleh dipersoal dan ditahan.

13. Tindakan-tindakan ini telah meningkatkan kurang keyakinan dan rasa tidak percaya terhadap mereka dalam Kerajaan. Semata-mata dengan menyatakan siasatan adalah berterusan tidak akan meyakinkan rakyat bahawa kebenaran akan berlaku.

14. Di mata dunia Malaysia telah menjadi sebuah negara pariah, sebuah negara di mana sesiapa sahaja boleh ditahan dan disoal siasat oleh polis, ditahan dan didakwa melalui menyalahgunaan undang-undang negara.

15. Dan Jabatan Peguam Negara akan menolak atau tidak mengambil hirau apa-apa laporan salah laku yang melibatkan Perdana Menteri.

16. Sudah pun ahli-ahli Kerajaan mengatakan bahawa tiada sesiapa, tidak juga Raja-Raja boleh komen mengenai penyalahgunaan yang jelas undang-undang Negara oleh Kerajaan.

TAWAU

1. Saya berada di Tawau pada 5 Oktober di atas jemputan dari seorang bekas calon parti lawan.

2. Ramai ahli UMNO di Sabah tidak dapat hadir bicara negarawan yang diadakan kerana dianjur oleh bukan UMNO. Kata mereka SUA UMNO amat marah jika ada ahli atau pemimpin yang hadir diperhimpunan ini.

3. Sesungguhnya saya sudah 15 tahun tidak ke Tawau. Sebab itu walaupun jemputan datang dari musuh UMNO saya terima kerana saya ingin lihat perubahan di Tawau. Kalau nak tunggu UMNO jemput, sampai bila pun saya tidak dapat lihat Tawau. Saya ini, walaupun masih ahli UMNO dan biasa menjadi Presiden UMNO, dianggap oleh kepimpinan UMNO sekarang sebagai musuh parti yang saya pimpin selama 22 tahun.

4. Ya lah. Saya tidak bersetuju dengan Dato Seri Najib, Presiden UMNO dan saya desak supaya dia disingkir. Tetapi dahulu saya juga cuba dijatuhkan oleh Tengku Razaleigh dan Musa Hitam. Tujuan mereka apabila mereka bertanding melawan saya dan Ghaffar ialah supaya saya tidak jadi Presiden lagi dan tidak jadi Perdana Menteri. Mereka berhajat menjatuhkan saya.

5. Saya tidak larang mereka berkempen di kalangan ahli-ahli UMNO dan ahli-ahli UMNO tidak dilarang oleh saya menghadiri kempen mereka. Bahagian-bahagian UMNO menjemput mereka untuk merasmikan mesyuarat Bahagian dan mereka berkempen semasa perasmian dan dimasa-masa lain.

6. Ada Bahagian yang mencalon Tengku Razaleigh dan Musa Hitam sebagai Presiden dan Timbalan Presiden. Saya tidak anggap mereka musuh saya dan perlu diambil tindakan. Tidak ada larangan terhadap pencalonan oleh mereka kerana ini memang cara demokrasi. Diwaktu ini calon-calon untuk Presiden Amerika Syarikat sibuk berkempen dimana-mana sahaja, kerana inilah cara demokrasi.

7. Tetapi sekarang Presiden UMNO belum pun dicabar secara rasmi sudah tidak benar saya berjumpa dengan pemimpin dan ahli-ahli UMNO. Ada unsur ugutan dalam arahan ini. Akan diambil tindakan, akan dibuang dari parti, akan disiasat. Masa depan dalam parti akan menjadi gelap. Tidak boleh jadi pemimpin lagi; tidak akan dijadikan calon lagi.

8. Dimasa yang sama sesiapa yang menegur Presiden dituduh cuba sabotaj, cuba menggugat demokrasi, menjatuhkan Presiden yang dipilih secara demokratik. Mereka yang membuat laporan polis kerana kehilangan duit Kerajaan disoal dan disiasat, dijadikan muflis. Dan seterusnya ditahan. Apabila dibebas oleh mahkamah ditangkap semula bawah undang-undang baru Sosma, undang-undang kononnya untuk terrorist pengganas.

9. Apakah orang yang melapor kepada polis berkenaan jenayah yang berlaku boleh dituduh jadi pengganas.

10. Sambil melaung-laungkan demokrasi peguam pihak yang dituduh pun disoal siasat. Peguam pun hendak ditakutkan.

11. Semua ini menakutkan rakyat, terutama ahli UMNO dan pemimpin kerdilnya. Mereka tahu ada perkara yang salah yang sedang berlaku. Tetapi mulut mereka ditutup. Telinga juga ditutup.

12. Kebebasan bersurat khabar yang kononnya didokong oleh Kerajaan ditutup kerana melapor berkenaan jenayah 1MDB dan lain-lain.

13. Imej negara ini sudah bertukar dari demokrasi kepada seakan-akan police state dimana undang-undang disalahguna untuk menakutkan rakyat. Kesalahan Kerajaan dan Perdana Menteri tidak boleh disebut pun. Perjumpaan rakyat dihalang dengan berbagai cara, dituduh rasis dan Kerajaan menggalakkan demonstrasi rasis diadakan kerana kononnya perhimpunan bersih yang bertujuan meminta Najib berhenti didakwa adalah rasis, satu percubaan orang Cina menjatuhkan Kerajaan Melayu.

14. Kerajaan menuduh sesiapa yang mendedah kesalahan Najib sebagai percubaan mengguling Kerajaan secara tidak demokratik.

15. Sebenarnya Kerajaanlah yang dengan mengugut bertindak terhadap rakyat, melarang ahli UMNO dari mendengar syarahan politik, Kerajaan sudah tidak demokratik lagi. Tidak ada demokrasi untuk diruntuh oleh rakyat, kerana demokrasi sudah pun dimusnah oleh Kerajaan.

16. Alhamdulillah, ada beribu orang Sabah yang tidak gentar dengan ugutan dan mereka hadir di perhimpunan di Tawau.

ENGLISH VERSION

TAWAU

1. I was in Tawau on October 5 at the invitation of a former opposition candidate.

2. Many members of UMNO in Sabah were not able to attend Bicara Negarawan which was held as it was organized by non-UMNO. They said the Secretary General of UMNO will be very angry if there are members or leaders who attend this gathering.

3. Actually I had not been to Tawau for 15 years. Therefore, even though the invitation had come from UMNO’s rival I accepted because I want to see the changes in Tawau. If I have to wait for UMNO’s invitation I do not know when I will be able to see Tawau. I, although still a member of UMNO and used to be the President of UMNO, am now considered by the UMNO’s present leadership as an enemy of the party that I used to lead for 22 years.

4. Yes. I do not agree with Dato Seri Najib, the President of UMNO and I insisted that he should be removed. But previously Tengku Razaleigh and Musa Hitam had also tried to remove me. Their intention when they stand against me and Ghaffar was that I did not become President again and also do not become Prime Minister. Their intention was to remove me.

5. I did not forbid them from campaigning among members of UMNO and UMNO members were not forbidden by me to attend their campaign. UMNO Divisions invited them to officiate their divisional meetings and they campaigned while officiating these programmes and at other times.

6. There are divisions that nominated Tengku Razaleigh and Musa Hitam as President and Vice President. I did not regard them as my enemies and to take action against. There were no restrictions on nominations by them because this is the way of democracy. At this time candidates for President of the United States are busy campaigning everywhere, because this is the way of democracy.

7. But now the President of UMNO has not even been officially challenged, already I am not allowed to meet leaders and members of UMNO. There is an element of intimidation in this directive. Action will be taken, will be sacked from the party, will be investigated. Their future in the party will be bleak. Cannot be a leader anymore, will not be nominated as a candidate again.

8. At the same time those who rebuke the President are accused of trying to sabotage, trying to undermine democracy, of overthrowing a democratically elected President. Those who make police reports on loss of government money are being questioned and investigated, forced into bankruptcy. And subsequently arrested. If acquitted by the court will be re-arrested under the new law Sosma, a law ostensibly for terrorists.

9. Can people who report to police on crimes committed be accused of being terrorists?

10. While there all these talks about democracy, lawyer of the accused was also investigated. Fear are even instilled into lawyers.

11. All these scare people, especially UMNO members and its insignificant leaders. They know there are things not right happening. But their mouths are shut. Their ears are also closed.

12. Freedom of press supposedly backed by the Government are abolished due to reports made about the crimes of 1MDB and others.

13. Image of the country had changed from a democracy to a quasi-police state in which laws are being abused to scare people. Errors of the Government and the Prime Minister cannot even be mentioned. Gathering of people is restricted by various means, accused of being racist, and the Government encouraged demonstrations with racist overtone supposedly because Bersih rally that aimed to ask Najib to resign is deemed racist, an attempt by the Chinese people to overthrow a Malay Government.

14. The Government has accused those who attempt to expose Najib’s wrong doings as undemocratic attempts to overthrow the Government.

15. Actually, it is the government that is threatening action against the people, prohibiting UMNO members from listening to political lectures, the government is no longer democratic. There is no democracy to be demolished by the people, for democracy is already destroyed by the Government.

16. Thanks to Allah, there are thousands of people in Sabah that are not daunted by threats and they were present at the rally in Tawau.

NO CONFIDENCE VOTE

1. I read a report that the Speaker of Dewan Rakyat will not allow a motion of non-confidence to be tabled in the Dewan by anyone.

2. He insists that only he can decide whether such a motion can be put before the house or not.

3. The reason he says is that Parliamentary standing orders are silent on this matter. Also it had never been done before.

4. True, it had never been done before. That was because none of the previous five Prime Ministers had 2.6 billion Ringgit in their personal accounts, nor have they been involved in financial scandals and the alleged murder of anyone.

5. None of the previous Prime Ministers had dismantled the institutions investigating into the origins and whereabout of the money they had.

6. None of the previous Prime Ministers had borrowed RM42 billion at high cost to set up a development fund which became involved in shady deals.

7. None of them had invested more than one billion USD in dubious joint-venture projects with equally dubious Arab companies.

8. None of them had dissolved the joint-venture company only 6 months after formation and converted the 1MDB capital into loan with the partner they don’t think they should continue to have the joint-venture with.

9. But Najib is involved in all these. And now, other than saying the 1MDB assets are worth more than the 42 billion Ringgit borrowed, he cannot prove where the money is. The assets are actually Government land which Najib allowed 1MDB to acquire at ridiculously low prices, and then revalued 500 times more.

10. A vote of non-confidence is totally democratic. Parliament may not have any provision for it but the Constitution, the supreme law of the country clearly states that if the Prime Minister no longer commands the support of the majority of the members of Parliaments, he should resign. Article 43 (4) of the Federal Constitution states “If the Prime Minister ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House of Representatives, then, unless at his request the Yang di-Pertuan Agong dissolves Parliament, the Prime Minister shall tender the resignation of the Cabinet”.

11. So, is the Speaker trying to ignore the constitution?

12. Today, if you go abroad, foreigners, especially their press will ask, “Hey, what is happening to your country?” You will feel ashamed, but you can do nothing about it. The people who can do something are totally without shame. They openly admit to having received money by the millions from the Prime Minister. This is corruption at its worst. They support the PM because he gave them money, money which he cannot explain with any credibility that he obtained legally.

13. No wonder Malaysia is now listed as among the top of the corrupt countries of the world. And now the supporters of the Government do not even respect the Constitution.

14. No vote of non-confidence because the speaker will not allow it.

NAJIB

1. I had worked hard to make Najib the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

2. But now I want him to be removed, to step down from being Prime Minister.

3. It is nothing personal.

4. It is because he has failed terribly as Prime Minister.

5. Very early I noted the wrong things he was doing.

6. We have been independent since 1957. We should be able to run our own country by ourself. Indeed we had been doing so for decades before Najib, and we did very well.

7. But Najib appointed several British officers as his advisers.

8. Najib appointed many foreign consultants to advise him on running the country.

9. These people cost billions of Ringgits but their advise were generally not good for the country. They knew nothing about the politics, economics and sensitivities of Malaysia. As a result the development of Malaysia has slowed down and the races are at each others throats.

10. Najib’s Government became extremely unpopular. Despite giving lots of money to the people, they rejected him in the elections of 2013. He performed worse than Abdullah, who was also rejected by the people. The Chinese rejected him totally despite his declaring himself to be their brother.

11. He antagonised the civil servants by setting up Pemandu to take over the job of the EPU. Pemandu non-Government personnel were paid very high salaries, far above the Government Salary Scheme. So annoyed were the Civil servants that a few, upon retirement joined the opposition party and stood as opposition candidates, something which never happened before.

12. The growth of the economy fell below those of the Philippines and Indonesia.

13. The currency depreciated and share prices went down badly creating problems for businesses, importers and exporters. The cost of living went up especially after the GST.

14. Then came the 1MDB scandal. A totally unnecessary fund was created which was to be financed by huge borrowings. The Government gave one million Ringgit as capital but 1MDB (1 Malaysia Development Berhad) borrowed 42 billion Ringgit from the market. It paid high interest of 5.9% and gave 10% commission to Goldman Sachs. Government never borrowed so much or paid such high rates.

15. 1MDB bought electric power plants at higher than market price. It also bought the debts of the power companies. Total cost was 18 billion Ringgit. 1 MDB lost so much money that it cannot pay the interest on the loans.

16. 1MDB bought Government land at 60 Ringgit per square foot when the real price is over RM3000 psf. Revaluing the land by 50 times, it claims its asset is bigger than its debts. This is like selling Approved Permits obtained free from the Government.

17. Then 1MDB entered into shady business with Petro Saudi as JV partner. It paid USD 1 Billion for its 40% share. Six months, later the JV was dissolved. But the USD 1 Billion together with another 700 million USD were converted to a loan to Petro Saudi. The money has now disappeared.

18. The only assets that 1MDB has are the power plants and the land in Kuala Lumpur. More than RM20 Billion of the 42 billion Ringgit cannot be traced or accounted for.

19. Then suddenly the Wall Street Journal reported that Najib had in his private account at the Arab Malaysian Bank USD700 million (amounting to RM2.6 billion at that time)

20. No PM of Malaysia or UMNO President can have that much money. All donations to UMNO are normally received and banked by the UMNO Treasurer. All assets are placed under the name of three trustees.

21. Never in the history of UMNO had there been more than RM250 million in cash. All other assets are in the form of shares, land and buildings. The President is duty-bound to hand over all donations to the treasurer for banking. The President never had UMNO money or money donated to UMNO for elections for example in his private account. There is no provision for UMNO accounts to be operated by the President.

22. Najib and his wife are well-known for a lavish life-style. Obviously millions were spent on the betrothal and numerous wedding ceremonies in Malaysia and Kazakhstan. Najib’s step-son spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying property in London, New York and California. He also financed the production of a Hollywood movie, “The Wolf of Wall Street” with over 100 million US Dollars.

23. On Najib’s salary as Prime Minister, it is impossible for him to spend millions on all these. A statement by the PMO claimed that the money for the foreign properties and film was inherited. It is impossible for Tun Razak, or Haji Noah or Rosmah’s father to have and leave hundreds of millions of Ringgit. They were not even known as millionaires. Najib’s brothers refuted the claim.

24. So where did the money come from. Najib claims the 2.6 billion Ringgit was donated to him by an Arab. This is ridiculous. Nobody ever gives that amount of money to anyone. And Najib cannot prove that the Arab had given the money.

25. And so a special task force consisting of the A.G, the Anti Corruption

Commissioner, the Governor of Bank Negara and the Inspector-General of Police was set up to investigate the source of the RM 2.6 billion in Najib’s private account at The Arab Malaysian Bank.

26. The Public Accounts Committee of the Dewan Rakyat was also investigating what happened to the RM 42 billion Ringgit borrowed by 1MDB. So was the Auditor General.

27. Suddenly Najib sacked the Attorney-General claiming he was sick. The A.G denied he was sick. There was no certificate by doctors to prove he was sick. Najib had no right to claim that the A.G was sick.

28. At the same time the head of the Anti-Corruption Commission was said to have gone on leave. The Governor of Bank Negara was silent. Later she stated she was afraid of being arrested.

29. Two of the Government members of the PAC were made deputy ministers and another two given other jobs. They could not carry on their work as PAC members. The PAC was without a Chairman and its investigation of 1MDB has stopped.

30. Two members of the Anti-Corruption Commission were arrested, released and transferred to the PM’s office. After complaints were made they were transferred back to the Commission.

31. The assistant head of the Special Branch was transferred out. He then made a strong statement against his transfer.

32. People who spoke about 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s account, or reported on it were arrested, have their passports confiscated and threatened by the police with questioning. It seems that any question about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion constitute acts to undermine democracy and to topple a properly elected Government. People can be detained for up to 28 days without trial under a new law which is meant for acts of terrorism. Talking about 1MDB and Najib’s 2.6 billion seems to constitute acts of terrorism. Najib forgets that he was involved in the removal of his predecessor who was also elected democratically.

33. Then came a bombshell. Al Jazeera screened the story of the murder of the Mongolian girl Altantuya. It was clear from the story that Najib has something to do with the murder.

34. Many Malaysians refuse to believe it. But people all over the world believe the story. It has become an international scandal. It has brought shame to Malaysia. Everywhere one goes, one is asked, “What has happened to Malaysia”.

35. Between 1MDB, the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s private account and the murder of Altantuya, Malaysia’s good name has been totally blackened. Never before has Malaysia become so disgraced by its own Prime Minister. Never before have people looked down upon this country. Never before have Malaysians been so ashamed of their country.

36. Najib has paid people to demonstrate in the streets in support of him. He has of course made it illegal for people to demonstrate for his removal.

37. If the currency and the economy is to recover, Najib must cease to be Prime Minister of Malaysia. Malaysians must demand for Najib’s removal. It is totally democratic to demand for his removal. The actions he has taken to detain people for holding rallies to demand for his removal is what is undemocratic and against the laws of this country.

38. I call upon all Malaysians to demand that Najib allows the investigation against him to be carried out by independent people not appointed by him. Najib must allow due legal process to go on. If it is found that he had done illegal things he should be made to resign.

39. Only his ceasing to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia will the economy recover, the Ringgit revalued up, and cost of living go down. Only after his removal can Malaysians stand tall again.

VERSI BM

1. Saya telah bekerja keras untuk menjadikan Najib Perdana Menteri Malaysia.

2. Tetapi sekarang saya mahu dia disingkirkan, meletak jawatan daripada menjadi Perdana Menteri.

3. Ia bukan hal peribadi.

4. Ia adalah kerana dia telah gagal teruk sebagai Perdana Menteri.

5. Daripada awal lagi saya perhatikan perkara-perkara salah yang dia lakukan.

6. Kita telah merdeka semenjak 1957. Kita sepatutnya dapat mentadbir negara kita sendiri. Sesungguhnya kita telah pun berbuat demikian selama beberapa dekad sebelum Najib, dan kita telah melakukannya dengan cemerlang.

7. Tetapi Najib melantik beberapa pegawai British sebagai penasihatnya.

8. Najib telah melantik ramai perunding asing untuk menasihatinya bagaimana mentadbir negara.

9. Orang-orang ini melibatkan kos berbilion-bilion ringgit tetapi nasihat mereka secara amnya tidak baik untuk negara ini. Mereka tidak tahu apa-apa tentang politik, ekonomi dan sensitivi Malaysia. Akibatnya pembangunan Malaysia lembab dan bangsa-bangsa berada dalam keadaan menentang satu sama lain.

10. Kerajaan di bawah pimpinan Najib menjadi sangat tidak popular. Walaupun memberi banyak wang kepada rakyat, mereka menolak beliau dalam Pilihan Raya 2013. Prestasi beliau lebih buruk daripada Abdullah, yang juga telah ditolak oleh rakyat. Orang Cina menolaknya sama sekali walaupun beliau mengisytiharkan dirinya sebagai saudara mereka.

11. Dia menimbulkan kemarahan kakitangan awam dengan menubuhkan Pemandu untuk mengambil alih tugas EPU. Kakitangan Pemandu yang bukannya pegawai Kerajaan telah dibayar gaji yang tinggi, jauh lebih tinggi mengatasi Skim Gaji Kerajaan. Begitu marah, sebilangan pejawat awam sebaik sahaja bersara mereka telah menyertai parti pembangkang dan bertanding sebagai calon pembangkang, sesuatu yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelum ini.

12. Pertumbuhan ekonomi jatuh di bawah paras pertumbuhan ekonomi Filipina dan Indonesia.

13. Mata wang telah susut dan harga saham susut dengan teruk mengakibatkan masalah untuk perniagaan, pengimport dan pengeksport. Kos sara hidup meningkat terutama selepas GST.

14. Kemudian datangnya pula skandal 1MDB. Suatu dana yang sama sekali tidak perlu telah diwujudkan yang akan dibiayai oleh pinjaman yang besar. Kerajaan telah memberi satu juta Ringgit sebagai modal tetapi 1MDB (1Malaysia Development Berhad) telah meminjam 42 bilion Ringgit daripada pasaran. Ia membayar faedah yang tinggi sebanyak 5.9% dan memberikan komisen 10% kepada Goldman Sachs. Kerajaan tidak pernah meminjam begitu banyak atau membayar kadar yang begitu tinggi itu.

15. 1MDB membeli loji kuasa elektrik pada harga lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran. Ia juga membeli/mengambilalih hutang piutang syarikat-syarikat janakuasa. Jumlah kos adalah 18 bilion Ringgit. 1MDB kehilangan begitu banyak wang sehingga ia tidak boleh membayar faedah ke atas pinjaman.

16. 1MDB membeli tanah Kerajaan pada 60 Ringgit kaki persegi sedangkan harga sebenarnya adalah lebih daripada RM3,000 kaki persegi. Dengan menilai semula tanah itu sebanyak 50 kali ganda, ia mendakwa asetnya adalah lebih besar daripada hutangnya. Ini adalah seperti menjual permit import yang didapati secara percuma daripada Kerajaan.

17. Kemudian 1MDB telah menyertai perniagaan yang mencurigakan dengan Petro Saudi sebagai rakan usaha sama. Ia membayar USD1 Bilion bagi saham 40 peratus miliknya itu. Enam bulan kemudian usaha sama ini telah dibubarkan. Akan tetapi USD1 Bilion itu bersama dengan USD700 juta yang lain telah ditukar menjadi pinjaman kepada Petro Saudi. Wang ini kini telah lesap.

18. Satu-satunya aset yang dipunyai oleh 1MDB sekarang adalah loji kuasa dan tanah di Kuala Lumpur. Lebih daripada RM20 Bilion daripada 42 Bilion ringgit itu tidak dapat dikesan atau dihitung.

19. Kemudian tiba-tiba Wall Street Journal melaporkan bahawa Najib mempunyai USD700 juta dalam akaun peribadinya di Bank Arab-Malaysia (bersamaan RM2.6 bilion pada masa itu).

20. Tidak ada PM Malaysia atau Presiden UMNO yang boleh mempunyai wang sebanyak itu. Semua sumbangan kepada UMNO biasanya diterima dan dibankkan oleh Bendahari UMNO. Semua aset diletakkan di bawah nama tiga pemegang amanah.

21. Tidak pernah dalam sejarah UMNO terdapat lebih daripada RM250 juta secara tunai. Semua aset lain adalah dalam bentuk saham, tanah dan bangunan. Presiden adalah bertanggungjawab untuk menyerahkan semua sumbangan kepada Bendahari untuk perbankan. Presiden tidak pernah menyimpan wang UMNO atau wang didermakan kepada UMNO, untuk pilihan raya misalnya, di dalam akaun peribadinya. Tiada peruntukan untuk akaun UMNO dikendalikan oleh Presiden.

22. Najib dan isterinya terkenal dengan gaya hidup yang mewah. Jelas sekali jutaan telah dibelanjakan untuk pertunangan dan pelbagai majlis perkahwinan di Malaysia dan Kazakhstan. Anak tiri Najib membelanjakan ratusan juta dolar membeli hartanah di London, New York dan California. Beliau juga membiayai pembikinan filem Hollywood, “The Wolf of Wall Street” dengan perbelanjaan melebihi USD100 juta.

23. Dengan gaji Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri, adalah mustahil baginya untuk membelanjakan jutaan ringgit bagi semua ini. Ada satu kenyataan oleh PMO yang mendakwa bahawa wang bagi harta-harta luar negara dan filem itu telah diwarisi. Adalah mustahil bagi Tun Razak, atau Haji Noah atau bapa Rosmah untuk memiliki dan mewariskan ratusan juta Ringgit. Malah mereka tidak dikenali sebagai jutawan pun. Adik beradik Najib menafikan dakwaan itu.

24. Jadi dari mana datangnya wang itu? Najib mendakwa 2.6 bilion Ringgit itu telah didermakan kepadanya oleh seorang Arab. Ini tidak masuk akal. Tiada siapa yang pernah memberikan wang sebanyak itu kepada sesiapa. Dan Najib tidak dapat membuktikan bahawa orang Arab itu telah memberinya wang.

25. Dan dengan itu sebuah pasukan petugas khas yang terdiri daripada Peguam Negara, Pesuruhjaya Pencegahan Rasuah, Gabenor Bank Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara telah ditubuhkan untuk menyiasat punca RM2.6 bilion berada dalam akaun peribadi Najib di Bank Arab-Malaysia.

26. Jawatankuasa Kira-Kira Dewan Rakyat juga sedang menyiasat apa yang berlaku kepada RM 42 bilion Ringgit yang dipinjam oleh 1MDB. Begitu juga Ketua Audit Negara.

27. Tiba-tiba Najib memecat Peguam Negara dengan mendakwa dia sakit. Peguam Negara menafikan beliau sakit. Tidak ada sijil oleh doktor membuktikan dia sakit. Najib tidak mempunyai hak untuk mendakwa bahawa Peguam Negara sedang sakit.

28. Pada masa yang sama, ketua Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah dikatakan telah pergi bercuti. Gabenor Bank Negara membisu. Kemudian dia menyatakan dia takut ditangkap.

29. Dua daripada ahli-ahli Kerajaan PAC dilantik Timbalan Menteri dan dua lagi diberi pekerjaan lain. Mereka tidak dapat meneruskan kerja-kerja mereka sebagai ahli PAC. PAC adalah tanpa seorang Pengerusi dan siasatan 1MDB telah berhenti.

30. Dua anggota Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah telah ditangkap, dibebaskan dan dipindahkan ke Pejabat Perdana Menteri. Selepas komplen dibuat mereka telah dipindahkan semula ke Suruhanjaya.

31. Penolong Ketua Cawangan Khas telah dipindahkan keluar. Beliau kemudian membuat kenyataan yang keras terhadap pemindahannya.

32. Orang yang bercakap mengenai 1MDB dan 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun Najib, atau melaporkan mengenainya telah ditangkap, pasport mereka dirampas dan diancam oleh polis dengan soal siasat. Ianya seolah-olah sebarang soalan mengenai 1MDB dan Najib 2.6 bilion merupakan tindakan untuk melemahkan demokrasi dan menjatuhkan Kerajaan yang dipilih dengan betul. Orang boleh ditahan sehingga 28 hari tanpa perbicaraan di bawah undang-undang baru yang bertujuan untuk mencegah tindakan keganasan. Bercakap tentang 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion kepunyaan Najib seolah-olah merupakan tindakan keganasan. Najib lupa bahawa beliau sendiri terlibat dalam penyingkiran pemimpin terdahulu yang juga dipilih secara demokrasi.

33. Kemudian datangnya sesuatu yang menggemparkan. Al Jazeera menayangkan kisah pembunuhan gadis Mongolia Altantuya. Adalah jelas daripada kisah itu bahawa Najib mempunyai kaitan dengan pembunuhan itu.

34. Ramai rakyat Malaysia tidak mahu mempercayainya. Tetapi orang di seluruh dunia mempercayai cerita itu. Ia telah menjadi satu skandal antarabangsa. Ia telah memalukan Malaysia. Di mana-mana sahaja sesiapa pergi, ada yang bertanya, “Apa yang telah berlaku kepada Malaysia”.

35. Di antara 1MDB, 2.6 bilion ringgit dalam akaun peribadi Najib dan pembunuhan Altantuya, nama baik Malaysia benar-benar rosak. Tidak pernah sebelum ini, Malaysia menjadi begitu hina oleh Perdana Menterinya sendiri. Tidak pernah orang memandang rendah negara ini. Tidak pernah sebelum ini rakyat Malaysia begitu malu dengan negara mereka.

36. Najib telah membayar orang untuk menunjuk perasaan di jalan-jalan untuk menyokong beliau. Dengan sewenangnya beliau juga mengharamkan usaha orang-orang tunjuk perasaan bagi memecatnya.

37. Untuk mata wang dan ekonomi pulih, Najib mesti berhenti menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Rakyat Malaysia mesti menuntut penyingkiran Najib. Ianya sesuatu yang amat demokratik untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau. Tindakan yang diambil beliau untuk menahan seseorang untuk mengadakan perhimpunan untuk menuntut penyingkiran beliau adalah apa yang tidak demokratik dan bercanggah dengan undang-undang negara ini.

38. Saya menyeru semua rakyat Malaysia untuk menuntut Najib membenarkan siasatan terhadapnya yang akan dijalankan oleh orang-orang bebas yang tidak dilantik olehnya. Najib mesti membenarkan proses undang-undang berjalan. Jika didapati bahawa dia telah melakukan kesalahan dia perlu didesak untuk

meletakkan jawatan.

39. Hanya dengan pengundurannya sebagai Perdana Menteri Malaysia barulah ekonomi akan pulih, nilai ringgit akan meningkat, dan kos sara hidup akan turun. Hanya selepas penyingkirannya rakyat Malaysia akan mampu berdiri semula.

Al-JAZEERA

1. Najib’s Government claims that Al-Jazeera is trying to subvert his Government with the half-hour documentary on murder in Malaysia. It claims there is no truth in the report.

2. If the Government thinks there is no truth in the documentary, then it should sue Al-Jazeera for defamation.

3. Al-Jazeera is watched by millions throughout the world. Most will believe what they see. Merely saying that it is not true may convince some Malaysians but will not convince foreigners.

4. After all during the Merdeka month Al Jazeera showed a glowing documentary on Malaysia, including its PM. Viewers have a choice to believe which documentary.

5. This new documentary will blacken not only Najib’s name but the whole country as well. It is not pleasant to be told that the Prime Minister of Malaysia may be involved in a murder case.

6. Najib and his Government have a duty to clear our name. Proof must be given that the murder, the cover-up, the police involvement and Razak Baginda were in no way guilty of the terrible crime. The Judiciary including the AG’s Chambers too must clear their names especially with regard to the acquittal of Razak Baginda and the appeal by the Attorney General which was confined only to the two policemen. They were retried and were found guilty and sentenced to be hanged to death by the Appeals court.

7. Already Malaysians abroad are being asked what has happened to our country. This new episode is not going to improve the image of the country after the other scandals.

8. The Government must take this documentary film seriously and try to clear our name. Taking it off Al Jazeera in Malaysia would not change anything. The documentary has gone viral in Malaysia and is still shown throughout the world.

VERSI BM

Al-JAZEERA

1. Kerajaan Najib mendakwa bahawa Al-Jazeera cuba menggulingkan Kerajaan dengan dokumentari setengah jam mengenai pembunuhan di Malaysia. Ia mendakwa tidak ada kebenaran dalam laporan itu.

2. Jika sekiranya Kerajaan fikirkan tidak ada kebenaran dalam dokumentari ini, maka ia perlu menyaman Al-Jazeera kerana menfitnah.

3. Al-Jazeera ditontoni berjutaan orang di seluruh dunia. Kebanyakan akan percaya apa yang mereka lihat. Dengan hanya mengatakan bahawa ia tidak benar boleh meyakinkan sesetengah rakyat Malaysia tetapi tidak akan meyakinkan orang asing.

4. Sesungguhnya semasa Bulan Kemerdekaan Al Jazeera telah menunjukkan dokumentari gemilang mengenai Malaysia, termasuk Perdana Menteri. Penonton mempunyai pilihan untuk percaya mana-mana dokumentari.

5. Dokumentari baru ini bukan akan hanya menghitamkan nama Najib tetapi seluruh negara juga. Tidak menyenangkan diberitahu bahawa Perdana Menteri Malaysia mungkin terlibat dalam satu kes pembunuhan.

6. Najib dan Kerajaan beliau mempunyai tanggungjawab untuk membersihkan nama kita. Bukti perlu diberi bahawa pembunuhan ini, penyembunyian (cover-up), penglibatan polis dan Razak Baginda tidak sama sekali bersalah atas jenayah yang dahsyat ini. Badan Kehakiman termasuk Pejabat Peguam Negara juga perlu membersihkan nama mereka terutamanya yang berkaitan dengan pembebasan Razak Baginda dan rayuan oleh Peguam Negara yang terhad kepada dua anggota polis sahaja. Mereka telah dibicara semula dan didapati bersalah dan dihukum gantung sampai mati oleh Mahkamah Rayuan.

7. Sudah pun rakyat Malaysia di luar negara ditanya apa yang telah berlaku kepada negara kita. Episod baru ini tidak akan meningkatkan imej negara ini selepas skandal-skandal yang lain.

8. Kerajaan mesti mengambil serious filem dokumentari ini dan cuba untuk membersihkan nama kita. Mengeluarkannya dari Al Jazeera di Malaysia tidak akan mengubah apa-apa. Dokumentari ini telah tersebar luas di Malaysia dan masih ditayangkan di seluruh dunia.

WAHAI AHLI UMNO

1.Najib mendesak supaya kamu menyokong dirinya untuk kemenangan PRU14.2.​Malangnya menyokong Najib sebagai Ketua UMNO lebih menentukan kekalahan UMNO dan bukan kemenangan.

3.​UMNO tidak pernah menang semata-mata kerana sokongan ahli-ahlinya. Jumlah ahli dalam mana-mana kawasan tidak mencukupi untuk memberi kemenangan bagi calon UMNO. Tidak pernah ahli UMNO melebihi separuh dari jumlah pengundi dalam mana-mana kawasan.

4.​Yang memberi kemenangan kepada calon UMNO ialah orang Melayu, yang percaya kepada perjuangan UMNO, tetapi tidak menyertai UMNO. Orang Cina dan India juga menyumbang kepada kemenangan calon UMNO.

5.​Sekarang semua mereka ini sudah tidak percaya lagi kepada UMNO. Mereka benci Najib dan mereka percaya Najib mengguna wang untuk membeli sokongan pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO. Ini diakui oleh beberapa Ketua Bahagian dan Ahli Parlimen secara terbuka. Apabila pembangkang menamakan pemimpin UMNO yang telah disogok, tidak ada penafian dibuat oleh sesiapa.

6.​Tindakan Najib menghalang siasatan keatas wang 2.6 billion Ringgit yang ada dalam akaun peribadinya, membuktikan wang ini didapati secara haram. Jika didapati secara halal, Najib tidak perlu takut siasatan diteruskan.

7.​Pentadbiran Najib menyebabkan nilai Ringgit jatuh sehingga harga barang semua naik, inflasi tinggi, dan saham jatuh harga. Ramai sekarang ini sudah muflis. Beban ditokok dengan GST yang menyebabkan harga barangan dan khidmat naik lagi.

8.​Mereka yang ada anak belajar di luar negari terpaksa tambah Ringgit yang merosot nilai dari 4 Ringgit bagi 1 Pound kepada hampir 7 Ringgit 1 Pound.

9.​Pembangunan negara diabaikan dan wang sebanyak RM42 billion dipinjam, dilabur secara tidak bijak dan berbillion Ringgit sudah tidak dapat dikesan. Yang diketahui ialah Najib memiliki wang sebanyak 2.6 billion Ringgit dalam akaunnya di bank Arab-Malaysian. Sekarang wang ini telah dipindah entah kemana. Apabila siasatan dibuat oleh badan Kerajaan yang bertanggungjawab Najib bubar badan-badan ini.

10.​Sesungguhnya majoriti rakyat menolak dan benci Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri. Mereka tidak dapat terima dakwaan Najib bahawa 2.6 billion Ringgit yang ada dalam akaunnya adalah derma orang Arab.

11.​Dalam PRU14 mereka semua, Melayu, Cina dan India akan tolak BN kerana kepimpinan Najib. UMNO akan hancur kerana ramai dari ahli UMNO tidak dapat terima Najib dan perbuatannya. Ramai dari mereka akan undi parti lawan atau tidak mengundi.

12.​Sebaliknya jika Najib tidak lagi menjadi Presiden UMNO dan memimpin BN, besar kemungkinan BN dan UMNO akan menang. Perasaan benci rakyat tidak tertumpu kepada UMNO atau BN. Mereka tidak terima Najib dan kemarahan mereka hanyalah kepada Najib dan beberapa pemimpin UMNO yang membodek kerana hendak jawatan atau lain-lain.

13.​Ahli-ahli UMNO yang sayang dan ingin UMNO kekal dan berkuasa perlu tolak Najib sebelum pilihanraya. Jika penolakan ini dibuat terlalu lewat, masa untuk pemulihan UMNO tidak mencukupi.

14.​Jika sayang UMNO tolak Najib sekarang. Jika sayang Najib, UMNO akan hilang kuasa dan berkecai.

​

ENGLISH VERSION

OH UMNO MEMBERS

1.Najib urged you to support him to win the 14th general election.

2. Unfortunately supporting Najib as head of UMNO will most likely ensure a defeat for UMNO and not victory.

3. UMNO never won simply because of the support of its members alone. The number of members in any consti1.Najib urged ytuency is not sufficient to give victory to UMNO candidates. Members of UMNO never exceed more than half of the total voters in any constituency.

4. What gave victory to UMNO candidates are the Malays, who believe in UMNO’s struggle, but do not join the party. Chinese and Indians also contributed to the victory of the candidates of UMNO.

5. Now all these people no longer believe in UMNO. They hate Najib and believe Najib had used money to buy the support of UMNO leaders. This has been acknowledged openly by several Heads of Division and Members of Parliament. When the opposition named UMNO leaders who had been bribed, no disclaimer was made by anyone.

6. Najib’s action in preventing investigations into the RM 2.6 billion money existing in his personal account proves that this money had been obtained illegally. If it had been obtained lawfully, he need not fear if investigation continues.

7. Najib’s administration has caused the ringgit to fall until the price of everything goes up, high inflation and stock prices falling. Many today have gone bankrupt. The burden had been made worst with GST that causes the price of goods and services to rise further.

8. Those who have children studying outside the country are forced to add up to the Ringgit as the Ringgit have deteriorated in value from 4 to 1 to about 7 Ringgit per Pound.

9. Development of the country is neglected and a sum RM42 billion is borrowed, invested unwisely and billions of Ringgit is untraceable. What is known is that Najib has a sum of RM2.6 billion in his account at Arab-Malaysian Bank. Now the money has been transferred to who knows where. When investigation was made by the government body entrusted, Najib dismantled the body.

10. Indeed, the majority of the people rejects and hates Najib as Prime Minister. They cannot accept Najib’s contention that the RM2.6 billion in his account is donation from some Arabs.

11. In the GE14 all of them, Malays, Chinese and Indians will reject BN because of Najib’s leadership. UMNO will be destroyed because many of UMNO members cannot accept Najib and his actions. Many of them will vote the opposition or will not vote at all.

12. On the other hand, if Najib is no longer the President of UMNO and leads BN, there is a better likelihood that BN and UMNO will win. People’s hatred is not focussed on UMNO or BN. They do not accept Najib and their anger is towards Najib and some UMNO leaders who want to curry favour for appointments or others.

13. UMNO members who love and wish UMNO retained and in power must reject Najib before the election. If this rejection is made too late, the time to rehabilitate UMNO will not be sufficient.

14. If you love UMNO reject Najib now. If you love Najib, UMNO will lose power and be shattered.

BERSIH

1. Saya hadir dalam tunjuk perasaan anjuran Bersih pada 29-30 Ogos. Ramai yang tertanya-tanya apakah saya sudah jadi penyokong Bersih. Apakah saya sokong parti lawan DAP dan Kit Siang. Ada juga yang bertanya saya sudah

memihak kepada orang Cina.

2. Saya pernah menyatakan demonstrasi jalanan tidak harus diguna untuk tekanan politik kerana ia menjejaskan perniagaan terutama perniagaan kecil dan ekonomi Negara. Apakah sekarang perbuatan saya tidak menunjuk sifat berdolak-dalik dalam politik.

3. Saya tidak setuju dengan tunjuk perasaan kerana ada saluran lain yang boleh digunakan untuk menekan Kerajaan apabila menyalahguna kuasa.

4. Kita boleh buat laporan polis, dengan harapan polis dan Pendakwa Raya akan ambil tindakan, menghadapkan pihak yang dituduh ke mahkamah.

5. Tetapi sekarang Najib sudah bubar dan musnahkan institusi-institusi Kerajaan yang ditugas untuk melindungi hak rakyat.

6. Apabila dituduh telah lesapkan duit Kerajaan melalui 1MDB, Najib serah siasatan kepada Ketua Audit Negara dan Jawatankuasa Kira-kira Wang Negara (PAC – Public Accounts Committee) Dewan Rakyat. Rakyat disuruh tunggu sehingga siasatan oleh badan-badan ini selesai.

7. Apabila wang sebanyak RM2.6 bilion terdapat dalam akaun peribadi Najib, dan dia tak dapat menafi duit ini ada dalam akaunnya, dan ramai bertanya daripada mana duit ini datang, dan penjelasan yang munasabah tidak dapat diberi oleh Najib, maka satu pasukan bertugas (task force) dibentuk untuk secara rasmi menyelidik wang ini.

8. Pasukan ini terdiri daripada Pendakwa Raya, Ketua Polis Negara, Ketua Badan Pencegah Rasuah dan Gabenor Bank.

9. Rakyat menunggu hasil siasatan ini. Tiba-tiba Pendakwa Raya disingkir oleh Najib, Ketua Badan Pencegah Rasuah diarah bercuti, dan Gabenor Bank diugut kononnya kerana Bank Negara bocor maklumat. Dan terhentilah siasatan oleh badan ini.

10. Di masa yang sama Pengerusi PAC dan tiga lagi ahli diberi jawatan dalam Kerajaan dan siasatan berkenaan wang 1MDB oleh PAC pun dihentikan.

11. Beberapa pegawai polis dan lain-lain pegawai dipindah ke jawatan lain supaya tidak lagi dapat meneruskan siasatan.

12. Yang ditinggal dan yang baru dilantik adalah orang yang tidak tunjuk minat untuk membuat siasatan, bahkan sengaja menghalang apa-apa siasatan terhadap 1MDB dan duit RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib.

13. Semua saluran untuk menyiasat 1MDB dan RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun Najib sudah tidak lagi ada.

14. Sebaliknya Najib dan konco-konconya sering mendakwa duit RM2.6 bilion adalah derma. Tidak pula diperkenalkan penderma, punca kekayaannya, bentuk wang yang diberi, bank yang terlibat dan lain-lain butiran. Sebenarnya dakwaan ini tidak boleh diterima akal.

15. Kepada pemimpin UMNO Najib mendakwa bahawa RM2.6 bilion ini adalah untuk pilihanraya ke-14. Jika untuk parti belanja membeli nasi lemak atau minuman atau sewa kereta seperti dahulu, jumlah ini beratus kali ganda wang yang diperlukan.

16. Tetapi untuk sogok pemimpin dan ahli Dewan Rakyat dengan berjuta tiap seorang, untuk sogok pegawai supaya menipu, besar kemungkinan wang sebanyak RM2.6 bilion diperlukan.

17. Jika Najib menang kerana sogok wang, dia akan perlu lebih banyak wang lagi untuk mengekalkan dirinya sebagai PM dan untuk PRU 15. Dari mana akan datang berbilion lagi jika tidak secara haram. Malaysia akan diperintah oleh seorang Perdana Menteri yang bergantung kepada rasuah. Najib sendiri berkata “Cash is King” “Wang Tunai adalah Raja”. Raja inilah yang disembah oleh Najib.

18. Najib akan nafi tetapi keadaan Negara sekarang amat buruk. Hubungan kaum tegang. Nilai Ringgit dan saham jatuh dengan teruknya jauh lebih teruk dari Thailand, Singapura dan lain-lain Negara. Kos sara hidup melambung naik kerana GST dan lain-lain. Hutang Negara bertimbun dan lain-lain.

19. Inilah masa depan Malaysia jika Najib kekal. Segala cara menukar Perdana Menteri yang mengikut undang-undang dan Perlembagaan Negara sudah ditutup oleh Najib. Hanya dengan suara keramat rakyat dibantu dengan undi tidak percaya Dewan Rakyat sahaja yang boleh menjatuhkan Najib dan menyelamatkan Negara daripada perasuah.

20. Oleh itu saya terpaksa menyertai demonstrasi jalanan anjuran Bersih yang bertema singkirkan Najib kerana rasuah, dan saya rayu kepada ahli Dewan Rakyat UMNO dan BN supaya menyokong undi tidak percaya kepada Najib. BN tidak akan jatuh setelah Najib disingkir. BN masih parti majoriti.

21. Selagi Najib berkuasa semala itulah ekonomi merosot, nilai Ringgit jatuh, saham jatuh, kos sara hidup meningkat kerana GST, hutang Negara bertimbun dan tidak dapat dibayar, pengangguran bertambah, berbilion duit rakyat disalahgunakan.

22. Inilah nasib yang menunggu Malaysia kerana Najib.

ENG VERSION

1. I attended the demonstration organized by the Bersih on 29 to 30 August. Many have wondered whether I have become a supporter of Bersih. Do I support the opposition party DAP and Kit Siang. There are also some that asked whether I now favour the Chinese.

2. I did say that street protests should not be used for political pressure as it affects business, especially small businesses and the national economy. Is it not now my action reflects the flip-flop nature of politics.

3. I do not agree with demonstrations as there are other avenues that can be used to pressure the Government when there is abuse of power.

4. We can make a police report, hoping the police and the public prosecutor will take action, bringing the accused to court.

5. But now Najib had dismantled and destroyed the institutions of government that are tasked with protecting the rights of citizens.

6. When the accused had made Government money disappeared through 1MDB, Najib handed over the investigation to the Auditor General and the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee. People were told to wait until the investigations by these agencies are completed.

7. When the sum of RM2.6 billion appeared in Najib’s personal account, and he cannot deny this money in his account, and many had asked where the money came from, and no reasonable explanation can be given by Najib, then a task force was formally formed to investigate this money.

8. The task force is comprised of the Public Prosecutor, Inspector-General of Police, Head of Anti-Corruption Agency and Central Bank Governor.

9. People wer waiting for the results of this investigation. Suddenly, the Public Prosecutor was dismissed by Najib, Head of Anti-Corruption Agency was ordered to go on vacation, and Central Bank Governor threatened because it seemed Bank Negara leaked information. Thus ceased the investigation by this body.

10. At the same time the Chairman of the PAC and the three other members were given positions in the Government and the investigation by PAC on 1MDB money was stopped.

11. Several police officers and other officials were moved to other positions so that they were no longer able to continue the investigation.

12. What is left and the newly appointed are people who do not show any interest in making investigations, even wilfully obstructing any investigation into 1MDB money and RM2.6 billion in Najib’s account.

13. All channels to investigate 1MDB and RM2.6 billion in Najib’s account are no longer available.

14. Instead Najib and his henchmen often times claimed the RM2.6 billion money is a donation. No necessity to identify the donor, the source of his wealth, in what form the money was given, the banks involved and other details. In fact, this claim does not make any sense.

15. To leaders of UMNO Najib claimed the RM2.6 billion is for the 14th General Elections. If this is for the party to buy ‘nasi lemak’ or drinks or rent cars as in the past, this is hundreds of times more than the amount of money required.

16. But in order to bribe leaders and members of the House of Representatives by millions for each person, to bribe officials in order to deceive, it is highly probable that a sum of RM2.6 billion is required.

17. If Najib wins by bribing, he will need more money to retain himself as the PM and for PRU 15. From where will come the billions if not illegally. Malaysia will be governed by a Prime Minister who relies on corruption. He himself said, “Cash is King”. This is the King that is worshipped by Najib.

18. Najib will deny, but the situation in the country is now very bad. Tense race relations. The value of Ringgit and shares fell very badly, much worse than Thailand, Singapore and other countries. The cost of living skyrocketed because of GST and others. National debt piled up and others.

19. This is the future of Malaysia if Najib remains. All avenues to change the Prime Minister according to the law and the National Constitution have been closed by Najib. Only the sacred voice of the people assisted by a vote of no confidence in the House of Representatives can bring down Najib and save the country from the corrupt.

20. Therefore, I had to join street demonstrations organized by Bersih themed ‘get rid of Najib because of corruption’, and I appeal to UMNO and BN members of Parliament to support the vote of no confidence on Najib. BN will not fall after Najib is dismissed. BN is still the majority party.

21. As long as Najib remains in authority that will be for how long there is going to be economic slump, fall in ringgit, fall in stocks, the rise in cost of living because of GST, national debt will piled up and cannot be paid, increased unemployment, billions of public fund misused.

22. This is the fate that awaits Malaysia because of Najib.