Brian Yansky's Blog, page 21
March 6, 2012
doors and windows
It's important to figure out your strengths as a writer.
It's important to figure out what you do well in writing and what you don't do well. You're not going to do everything well. No one does. If you can discover some of your strengths and weaknesses, you can emphasize the former and minimize the later.
So how do you do that? By writing. By paying attention to what the people who read your writing say. Not everything, of course, and not from everyone. Some people just won't "get" your writing. Some people will focus in on certain aspects of your writing and not be able to help you with others. But if you keep hearing, again and again, from critique group members or other readers that they need more description of physical details in a scene you might start looking and focusing on that weakness of your writing in revision. You might look for places to add details and adding those details might actually help you in other ways, help you focus a scene etc… Sometimes working out one problem will have a larger effect on a manuscript that just the one problem because you'll see the work itself in a new way.
I know one of my problems is not enough physical details in scenes. In revision I always look for places--I think of them as doors and windows--where I can add something that will bring a scene into focus.
Or so I think today
It's important to figure out what you do well in writing and what you don't do well. You're not going to do everything well. No one does. If you can discover some of your strengths and weaknesses, you can emphasize the former and minimize the later.
So how do you do that? By writing. By paying attention to what the people who read your writing say. Not everything, of course, and not from everyone. Some people just won't "get" your writing. Some people will focus in on certain aspects of your writing and not be able to help you with others. But if you keep hearing, again and again, from critique group members or other readers that they need more description of physical details in a scene you might start looking and focusing on that weakness of your writing in revision. You might look for places to add details and adding those details might actually help you in other ways, help you focus a scene etc… Sometimes working out one problem will have a larger effect on a manuscript that just the one problem because you'll see the work itself in a new way.
I know one of my problems is not enough physical details in scenes. In revision I always look for places--I think of them as doors and windows--where I can add something that will bring a scene into focus.
Or so I think today
February 24, 2012
understanding character
Why are some actors not very good? Talent, of course, is part of any discussion about any art. But just setting aside talent for a second, when an actor isn't truly in a scene I think it's often because they don't understand the character. Or they understand the character only in a surface way and so their lines and expressions and body language all seem untrue. I think this is what happens to writers. They force themselves along and a scene just gets less and less true. The reader feels it when reading the manuscript. The writer isn' t there in the scene and the scene feels false.
How do you get there inside the character? I think writers find different ways. Some outline. Some journal. Some write and rewrite and rewrite and rewrite and so on. Thankfully, we have many chances. But one thing to consider is you have to try to see the scene unfold in a moment-to-moment way through the eyes of your narrator. When you're actually writing the scene, you have to try to be there by living the scene. If you're there in the scene, you'll make the right decisions and the scene will be true. Of course, you should test and retest this in revision but being there in the scene will allow the fiction to move forward in an organic way so that the plot grows out of the situation and characters.
It's a constant struggle and it isn't easy but one thing I do always try to do is see the scene unfold through the character.
How do you get there inside the character? I think writers find different ways. Some outline. Some journal. Some write and rewrite and rewrite and rewrite and so on. Thankfully, we have many chances. But one thing to consider is you have to try to see the scene unfold in a moment-to-moment way through the eyes of your narrator. When you're actually writing the scene, you have to try to be there by living the scene. If you're there in the scene, you'll make the right decisions and the scene will be true. Of course, you should test and retest this in revision but being there in the scene will allow the fiction to move forward in an organic way so that the plot grows out of the situation and characters.
It's a constant struggle and it isn't easy but one thing I do always try to do is see the scene unfold through the character.
February 21, 2012
student alien invasion video
Love this student video for ALIEN INVASION & OTHER INCONVENIENCES. It's for an English class.
February 17, 2012
Writing Badly
It's good to write bad sometimes. It doesn't seem good while you're doing it. Annoying. Frightening. Irritating. Discouraging. It seems more along the lines of these words. It FEELS more like that. You want to be better. You want to write beautiful prose with depth and meaning and you want your characters to feel right and all that.
Sometimes you can't.
In fact, in early drafts, you can't a lot. You have to write badly in order to get to the good stuff. For me, I'm finding my way in early drafts and I have to accept the imprecision of language and plot and character. If I don't accept these things, then I have to stop writing.
I don't want to do that.
I write nearly every day because I love it and because I believe that's how you keep the momentum of a manuscript. So I take the good with the bad and hope that in revision I can turn most of that bad into good.
Sometimes you can't.
In fact, in early drafts, you can't a lot. You have to write badly in order to get to the good stuff. For me, I'm finding my way in early drafts and I have to accept the imprecision of language and plot and character. If I don't accept these things, then I have to stop writing.
I don't want to do that.
I write nearly every day because I love it and because I believe that's how you keep the momentum of a manuscript. So I take the good with the bad and hope that in revision I can turn most of that bad into good.
February 9, 2012
Writing Isn't Baking a Pie
Writing isn't baking a pie. I see recipes for writing all the time and I think how part of me wishes they worked so I could find the recipe and every time I'd make a very nice pie and that would be that. No more worrying and driving myself crazy about whether this or that works or doesn't work or how to make a character really real instead of just a shadow of real. OR the big question—what am I missing in this manuscript? Parts of it sound right but parts of it don't. I want to ignore this sense of missing but I just can't quite fool myself into thinking it works and sometimes it haunts me.
If I had a recipe I could just put it all together, bake, and serve and people would eat (well, not literally) my book and they would say, "Pretty good." Maybe there are writers who do this. A few—not many.
So, yes, I wish for this sometimes. BUT where's the fun in that? Oh, maybe once or twice it would be fun, but without the struggle, the failures and the hard-earned victories, writing wouldn't be the adventure that it is. I look at writers like Ray Bradbury and Elmore Leonard, writers in their 80s, who say they still love writing, it still gets them out of bed in the morning. That's a wonderful thing. The act of writing enriches a life.
Recipes don't work but maybe it's a good thing they don't
If I had a recipe I could just put it all together, bake, and serve and people would eat (well, not literally) my book and they would say, "Pretty good." Maybe there are writers who do this. A few—not many.
So, yes, I wish for this sometimes. BUT where's the fun in that? Oh, maybe once or twice it would be fun, but without the struggle, the failures and the hard-earned victories, writing wouldn't be the adventure that it is. I look at writers like Ray Bradbury and Elmore Leonard, writers in their 80s, who say they still love writing, it still gets them out of bed in the morning. That's a wonderful thing. The act of writing enriches a life.
Recipes don't work but maybe it's a good thing they don't
January 31, 2012
invention
Here's something that I don't think is often talked about in writing books or writing magazines. I can't recall it being mentioned in the writing classes I've taken, including the MFA workshops I was in when I was getting my Masters in Writing. I think there's a certain atmosphere in most MFA programs that brands any talk about story as belonging to popular fiction and so from the wrong side of the tracks.
I don't believe that. All kinds of fiction need story. The great writers of the past, with notable exceptions of course because great means doing uniquely powerful work and that breaks all rules, have also been good storytellers.
Anyway, be that as it may, I think the topic of INVENTION isn't talked about much. Invention though can make a huge difference in the quality of work.
Now maybe at the sentence and language level invention is talked about. Inventive style and use of language is applauded. What I'm talking about though is coming up with inventive twists and turns of a story or inventive ideas that propel scenes or give characters a compelling otherness that's hard to resist as a reader.
Maybe one difficulty of talking about it is that inventiveness seems to belong more on the side of talent than craft. To my mind though, like the use of language, while certainly partly innate to the writer, aspects of it can be encouraged.
SO:
Don't be satisfied with obvious actions. Looks for places where characters might act in less obvious ways.
Allow yourself the freedom to wander wildly in a first draft when it comes to plot direction. You will, of course, go in many wrong directions and need to REVISE and REWRITE. Invention, by its nature, carries with it many failures. Ask any inventor. You will pay for your attempts, but those attempts may be the very thing that makes your story unique.
I don't believe that. All kinds of fiction need story. The great writers of the past, with notable exceptions of course because great means doing uniquely powerful work and that breaks all rules, have also been good storytellers.
Anyway, be that as it may, I think the topic of INVENTION isn't talked about much. Invention though can make a huge difference in the quality of work.
Now maybe at the sentence and language level invention is talked about. Inventive style and use of language is applauded. What I'm talking about though is coming up with inventive twists and turns of a story or inventive ideas that propel scenes or give characters a compelling otherness that's hard to resist as a reader.
Maybe one difficulty of talking about it is that inventiveness seems to belong more on the side of talent than craft. To my mind though, like the use of language, while certainly partly innate to the writer, aspects of it can be encouraged.
SO:
Don't be satisfied with obvious actions. Looks for places where characters might act in less obvious ways.
Allow yourself the freedom to wander wildly in a first draft when it comes to plot direction. You will, of course, go in many wrong directions and need to REVISE and REWRITE. Invention, by its nature, carries with it many failures. Ask any inventor. You will pay for your attempts, but those attempts may be the very thing that makes your story unique.
January 22, 2012
forget the formula
Bad Writing Advice #9: Write using a formula.
There are a lot of people out there who have story formulas they're trying to sell. And maybe they do work for some though I don't personally know any writer they work for. In most cases, I don't believe they work because writing is an organic act. You make a story come to life. Having to do X by page 49 and Y by page 61 and so on strangles the life out of your writing. This is not to say a writer shouldn't outline. Some do very well with an outline. It's not to say a writer can't plot and plan, but adherence to any formula throughout a manuscript robs it of the kind of spontaneity it needs to come to life.
You need, as a writer, to come upon surprises while you write and engage in those surprises in a way that they lead you to interesting shifts in story and character. You have to get down deep in yourself when you're writing and make connections between all the elements in your story. This requires intuitive leaps. Forget the formula.
Or so I think today.
There are a lot of people out there who have story formulas they're trying to sell. And maybe they do work for some though I don't personally know any writer they work for. In most cases, I don't believe they work because writing is an organic act. You make a story come to life. Having to do X by page 49 and Y by page 61 and so on strangles the life out of your writing. This is not to say a writer shouldn't outline. Some do very well with an outline. It's not to say a writer can't plot and plan, but adherence to any formula throughout a manuscript robs it of the kind of spontaneity it needs to come to life.
You need, as a writer, to come upon surprises while you write and engage in those surprises in a way that they lead you to interesting shifts in story and character. You have to get down deep in yourself when you're writing and make connections between all the elements in your story. This requires intuitive leaps. Forget the formula.
Or so I think today.
January 11, 2012
Plot
Einstein said something like make things as simple as possible but not simpler. Plot is rudimentary. It's what happens in a story. That's the simple version.
Jack and Jill go up the hill. Jack fetches a pail of water. On his way back to Jill he comes upon Sleeping Beauty and can't help kissing her. Jill catches them in the act. All the king's horses and all the king's men can't put Jack back together again.
I think you could complicate plot by adding that beyond what happens in the story there is what happens inside a character. The development of the character, her reaction to what happens in the story, is also a kind of internal plot, but if you want to keep it simple when trying to get into writing a story go back to the simple stories and ask what happens.
Jack and Jill go up the hill. Jack fetches a pail of water. On his way back to Jill he comes upon Sleeping Beauty and can't help kissing her. Jill catches them in the act. All the king's horses and all the king's men can't put Jack back together again.
I think you could complicate plot by adding that beyond what happens in the story there is what happens inside a character. The development of the character, her reaction to what happens in the story, is also a kind of internal plot, but if you want to keep it simple when trying to get into writing a story go back to the simple stories and ask what happens.
January 5, 2012
writing
Recently I was reading Laura Ruby's blog. Her novel, LILY'S GHOST, did very well when it came out six or seven years ago. But, as happens, it is now out of print. So she got her rights back and self-published the book (an e-book version) herself so the book lives on. That's an example, I think, of how the new world of publishing can be a good thing for writers. I know there are other writers who are having success self-publishing after being traditionally published, too. They have an audience. I think this has happened in music. Many well-known musicians who aren't "hot" enough for the big labels anymore do very well putting out their own songs or having a small recording company put them out.
Another example that I've seen discussed on-line in a few places is this situation: a first novel of a trilogy or series does pretty well but the publisher decides not to publish the second or third book because it didn't do well enough for them. It may have less to do with the quality of the new manuscript than sales and perception of the potential sales at the publisher. Why shouldn't the author publish the book if they still believe in it? The series probably already has some readers waiting for the next novel and it will be easier to publicize for this reason. Let the readers decide if it's as good as the first book or other books in the series. So in this case, self e-publishing makes sense.
And I should add I'm for anything that gives writers more power and choices. E books definitely give writers more options. However, I think a lot of writers will self-publish and find disappointment. It's hard, even with the backing of a publisher, for a book to get attention, get reviewed, and find readers. It will be even harder for new writers without any help.
And though we writers all complain about the lack of publisher support, publishers DO help every book. And they take care of all those little details and a lot of difficult non-writing work for the writer. I, for one, don't want to devote my time to the whole publishing business. I want to devote my time to writing new stories.
I don't really have any big insights. I just think it's an interesting time. Though I'm aware of the Chinese curse, "May you be born in interesting times" I think all this change is kind of exciting. Will there be more good books out there? Hard to say. For example, someone who is good at sales and publicity has a great advantage in self-publishing over someone who isn't. Their writing might not be very good but they get attention because they're good salespeople while better work goes unnoticed. So someone skilled at selling sells their book well and gets noticed and someone who isn't won't. Fair? I suppose in a business sense yes but not an artistic one. A lot of good books will still go unnoticed.
At any rate, good or bad, changes are coming. There will be some opportunities in those changes, and some disappointments. We,as writers, just have to stay most focused on writing, on the thing we love.
Or so I think today.
Another example that I've seen discussed on-line in a few places is this situation: a first novel of a trilogy or series does pretty well but the publisher decides not to publish the second or third book because it didn't do well enough for them. It may have less to do with the quality of the new manuscript than sales and perception of the potential sales at the publisher. Why shouldn't the author publish the book if they still believe in it? The series probably already has some readers waiting for the next novel and it will be easier to publicize for this reason. Let the readers decide if it's as good as the first book or other books in the series. So in this case, self e-publishing makes sense.
And I should add I'm for anything that gives writers more power and choices. E books definitely give writers more options. However, I think a lot of writers will self-publish and find disappointment. It's hard, even with the backing of a publisher, for a book to get attention, get reviewed, and find readers. It will be even harder for new writers without any help.
And though we writers all complain about the lack of publisher support, publishers DO help every book. And they take care of all those little details and a lot of difficult non-writing work for the writer. I, for one, don't want to devote my time to the whole publishing business. I want to devote my time to writing new stories.
I don't really have any big insights. I just think it's an interesting time. Though I'm aware of the Chinese curse, "May you be born in interesting times" I think all this change is kind of exciting. Will there be more good books out there? Hard to say. For example, someone who is good at sales and publicity has a great advantage in self-publishing over someone who isn't. Their writing might not be very good but they get attention because they're good salespeople while better work goes unnoticed. So someone skilled at selling sells their book well and gets noticed and someone who isn't won't. Fair? I suppose in a business sense yes but not an artistic one. A lot of good books will still go unnoticed.
At any rate, good or bad, changes are coming. There will be some opportunities in those changes, and some disappointments. We,as writers, just have to stay most focused on writing, on the thing we love.
Or so I think today.
December 14, 2011
story ideas
Ideas might come directly from character. A lot of writers start with a character and make that character move forward. What that character wants and what gets in the way of that want is what powers the story.
So let's say you have a little girl, a tomboy, and she's got a very distinct Southern voice. She lives in a little town. She has a strange neighbor next door.
Now what? Seems a little generic. If the voice of the girl is strong, though, maybe this will help the writer find her way. Let's say she has a brother and maybe a friend. They have some adventures.
Things begin to happen but if this story is just about the little girl and her friends, it might be good but it won't be great. A Southern town during the time of segregation and the Depression and a social structure that creates inequality and promotes prejudice though adds another dimension. The setting is another idea of the author and the development of that setting broadens the story. But now we need some kind of inciting event. A black man is accused of raping a white woman. The girl's father defends the black man.
I don't really know how Harper Lee began her story, but somehow many, many ideas bloomed in what could have been the simple story of a girl growing up in a small town. Harper Lee found her way to this larger story situation and then was able to write it so vividly she created a great novel.
So let's say you have a little girl, a tomboy, and she's got a very distinct Southern voice. She lives in a little town. She has a strange neighbor next door.
Now what? Seems a little generic. If the voice of the girl is strong, though, maybe this will help the writer find her way. Let's say she has a brother and maybe a friend. They have some adventures.
Things begin to happen but if this story is just about the little girl and her friends, it might be good but it won't be great. A Southern town during the time of segregation and the Depression and a social structure that creates inequality and promotes prejudice though adds another dimension. The setting is another idea of the author and the development of that setting broadens the story. But now we need some kind of inciting event. A black man is accused of raping a white woman. The girl's father defends the black man.
I don't really know how Harper Lee began her story, but somehow many, many ideas bloomed in what could have been the simple story of a girl growing up in a small town. Harper Lee found her way to this larger story situation and then was able to write it so vividly she created a great novel.
