Brian Yansky's Blog, page 18

Writers: Struggling With Rejection

Every writer knows rejection way too well. We all have to learn to deal with it. Sometimes the rejectors get it wrong. The NYT article below gives some good examples. I think sometimes rejection is just part of the process of improving your work. For most of us, it takes years of writing, revising, learning to find our writing way. In this blog entry, I wrote a little about being stubborn and give some  examples of famous work that was rejected.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/opinion/47-rejections-then-the-booker-long-list.html?src=recg&_r=0

AND MORE ON REJECTION FROM MEYou have to be stubborn to be a writer. You have to be stubborn with the work itself and you have to be stubborn to keep going in the face of compelling reasons not to write at all, let alone try to make a career out of writing.
One of the first things you have to be stubborn about is rejection. Every writer deals with it. Some have fewer rejections than others, it’s true, but with rare exceptions, writers will have a unpleasantly large collection of rejections. And each rejection is, at best, a thorn that you have to pull out of your side. On a bad day a rejection will be worse; it may become the voice that says, “You’re not good enough. You’ll never be good enough.”
So you let the voice have it’s say and you try to go on and if you can’t go on right away then you do something else for a short time. But you have to shut the voice up and remind yourself that the voice is you. A rejection of a story or novel is just saying that one person on that day can’t publish your work. It’s one opinion by someone who can choose very few pieces to publish. It’s not a rejection of you was a writer; it’s a rejection of one piece you’ve written. There’s plenty more where that came from. If you’re a writer, you have or will write many works of fiction. So let me just say it again. They are not rejecting you as a writer. Only you can do that.
And they’re fricken wrong a lot of the time. Here are just a few, a very few, examples.William Golding’s LORD OF THE FLIES –20 publisher rejectionsJK Rowling’s first Harry book—dozens of publishers passed (they cry themselves to sleep many nights)Heller’s CATCH 22—many rejectionsMadeleine L. Engle’s A WRINKLE IN TIME—29 rejectionsStephen King’s first novel, CARRIE—dozens of rejectionsUrsula K. Le Guin, George Orwell, William Faulkner, John LeCarre --all had rejections for great novels.

Using metaphor in speculative fiction

      One thing I love about writing speculative fiction is you can amplify an aspect of the real world and it becomes metaphor. In my novel, Alien Invasion & Other Inconveniences, I was trying to use an alien invasion to explore ideas about corporate greed and colonialism and power and what happens when a much more powerful civilization meets a weaker one. We know, from our own past, what often happens. This time all of earth is on the short end of that stick. OK, I want to tell a story, too, and make the language sing and make interesting characters, but the metaphor—the power of comparison and the various shades of mythical memory they can inspire—opened up many opportunities.     The sequel of my alien duology is Homicidal Aliens & Other Inconveniences. This one plays more with myth, trying to use ideas of the “hero” to give the story  and main character more emotional depth.     In Kristin Cashore’s Graceling series one of the evil characters can actually change the way people think. It’s his grace. Of course we see this kind of influence all the time--sometimes in the minor way of a dynamic speaker and sometimes in the more extreme way such as cult leaders like Manson and political tyrants like Hitler etc… She amplifies this kind of characteristic and uses the metaphor to give the story and character deeper value.     I think fantasy and sci-fi often are situational stories. There are great opportunities to use metaphor in any story but particularly in speculative fiction.

We'd all have to be exactly the same size to see eye-to-eye: making characters distinct

If we all saw everything the same it would be kind of a boring world. In fiction, if our characters all see things the same, well, it’s kind of  boring.
People are different. That’s the beauty and tragedy and mystery and frustration etc…of people. When I’m writing, I sometimes find that my characters start to sound too alike-- or maybe just two of them who I identify with most closely with sound alike. This is not good. Characters need to sound distinct and be distinct. This means not just what they do and how they do it but how they sound when they think and talk.
I struggle with this sometimes. I suppose most writers do. One way to help make your characters more distinct is to focus on their flaws. If your characters don’t have flaws, then that’s a problem too. Most likely they’ll have different flaws, and if they do this might help you make them more distinct. Along these same lines you might think of one sort of major flaw of a character to help you develop that character.
At any rate, characters are not the same size and they should each see the world a little or a lot differently.

Create the story from the inside out

How do you turn on the light? Because that’s one way to look at writing. You have to turn on the light in your fiction. You have to bring your world and story out of the darkness and into the light.
There’s a lot to the question though. The answer would have to cover all the aspects of craft and the somewhat less definable aspects beyond craft. It’s kind of like saying “how do you write a novel?” There are many many answers for that. You can say one sentence at a time but how much does that help? You can  say focus on the characters but…that’s only part of the story. There are so many things you have to do at once without thinking (while thinking a lot) in order to write a novel.
Bradbury says get out of the way. Let your intuition take over. I do think that sometimes you have to do just that. Let yourself be the story, be the characters, and the light will come on. By this I mean see what’s happening through your character’s eyes. Let the light come from that. Move with the character, think with the character, respond to the plot and setting with the character. Create the story from the inside out.

Why It's So Hard to Go From Last to First Draft

            When you’re writing final draft you’re crafting sentences, refining scenes, tweaking characters, sometimes tightening structure. It’s all about refinement. You’re living in your novel by that point. You’re comfortable. You’re excited. Each change seems to help. You know what you’re doing.            Now, of course, you may be wrong. Writers delude themselves all the time. We need this delusion to keep writing. We need to believe we’re writing something well. But whether you’re right about the feeling or not, those final moments of the final draft are pleasant. You’ve made it to your destination or close. Not as perfect as you imagined it. Never that. It was always a bit better in your imagination than you could do.            Still—not bad.            And then a day or week or whatever later you start the next novel. And it’s a bloody mess. Did you ever really know how to write a novel? How could you possibly have finished one in the first place? You know nothing. You can’t even write a decent sentence or if you do write one the next one sucks. Characters are as thin as a paper. And where are you going? You’re wandering like a drunk failing a sobriety test. You think, Lock me up, please! Get me away from this!            BUT “this” was how you began the last novel, too. Writing in the dark, stumbling and fumbling about, trying to find your way. One of the reasons it’s so hard to go from the last stages of a novel to the first stages of the next is the memory of those last stages is clearest in our minds. You yearn, if you’re like me, for the relative clarity and precision of the last work when you were at the last of it. But you have to put that out of your mind. Writing a first draft is a different experience. It has other pleasures, like the pleasures of discovery. Enjoy those. There will be plenty of time for all the refinements later.

A first draft is just the beginning. In a way, that’s liberating

WHY REVISION IS LIBERATING It should go without saying but I think I’ll say it anyway. Revision is more important than drafting. Nothing wrong with NANO or any other method or deadline that helps the writer push through a first draft. My own process is to write a first draft as quickly as possible. Just get it done. Just finish. But here’s the thing—I push through knowing it’s going to be, well, basically, crap. 99.999999999999999999999999999999% of the time it is crap for me and most writers. (That’s a percentage arrived at after careful mathematical evaluation of absolutely no data—in case you were wondering.)
I’ve heard agents call December the cruelest month because people who do NANO finish their novels and send their masterpieces into agents. And naturally they are bad, no terrible, and agents get hundreds of ridiculously bad manuscripts because novice writers have written a draft of a novel and think they’re done.NO. It just doesn't work that way for 99.99999999999999999999999% (or thereabouts) of us.
A first draft is just the beginning.  In a way, that’s liberating. You don’t have to get it right. You won’t get it right. You know this. You allow yourself to write on through the fog, the forest, the wasteland—whatever you want to call it. You accept there will be wrong turns and missteps and that acceptance helps you push through the very humbling experience of writing a first draft.
Revision, really re-seeing the novel in the first few revisions, and then revising language and re-seeing again and going through for particular problems and tightening characters and doing whatever you need to do over the next five or six versions of the novel—or however many it takes—is what shapes that rough draft into something that isn’t rough.
That’s how, in my humble opinion, a novel comes into being. It’s built and rebuilt and rebuilt. 

Don't Fear The Semi-Colon/Punctuation Is Not The Enemy

DON’T FEAR THE SEMI-COLON and DON’T BE A SEMI-COLON HATER. “I’m afraid of the semi-colon,” a fellow writer said. Don’t fear the semi-colon. It’s just a piece of punctuation. And don’t hate it either. There’s no reason to treat the semi-colon like some undesirable who crashes a party. Some people do though.
Some people are worried they’ll use it wrong but others seem to think it will turn off readers. They feel it has a snobbish quality.  Why not just use a period and be done with it? What, you’re too good for a period?  
The semi-colon is just another punctuation tool we have in our toolbox of punctuation. I need all the options I can get. Anyway it’s a sophisticated and friendly little comma and floating period ;--what’s not to like?
The semi-colon (;) looks less powerful than the colon ( :) , but looks can be, as we all know, deceiving. It is the only piece of punctuation that has the muscle, by itself,  to separate two independent clauses (also know in most circles as complete sentences).  So if you have two sentences that are related, the semi-colon works quite nicely. Or if you have a lot of short sentences and you want a longer one for the sake of paragraph rhythm, it’s there for you.  The only thing you have to be careful about is that you do have two complete sentences (thoughts). A thought and a half (dependent clause, independent clause) will just need a comma.
Embrace the semi-colon.  Just not too often.           

The Element of Surprise

HOW NOT TO START A NOVEL/ THE IMPORTANCE OF SURPRISEDon’t start a novel by having an outline that you’ve scratched in stone with diamonds. First of all, that’s a very expensive and difficult way to write. Secondly, you won’t want to change things. I think it’s essential that you be willing to change any outline you write because of the element of surprise. In this case, I mean the surprise most authors encounter in the act of writing fiction.
This surprise can happen in many different ways. Suddenly a character starts doing things you didn’t expect, or things happen to that character you didn’t expect, or a character you didn’t expect shows up in a “guess who’s coming to dinner” sort of surprise. Could be that the tone of the novel itself will change, giving the whole novel a different feel.  Could be many things. It’s the writing itself that puts you in places of surprise. And your surprise will translate into surprises for your readers.
You have to be open to these surprises to take advantage of their narrative vitality and importance. 

genre blending/bending

As a writer I like to draw outside the lines of genre. I cross the borders of sci-fi and fantasy and realistic fiction and mystery and literary fiction and comedy and drama because a mix of genres helps me find the spark(s) that drive my story and give form and structure to it. Genres are all well and good if that’s where your work naturally fits. Mine doesn’t. I have to wander. Good for me. Not necessarily good for marketing.
A lot of people call the kind of fiction I’m talking about genre bending, but I think of it more as genre blending. I end up wandering in and out of genres and taking what I can from each that helps me tell my story.
People who sell books, as opposed to write them, like genres. They want to be able to put fiction in a neat category for the purposes of drawing a particular audience. (More true of adult novels than YA) Completely understandable. It makes it easier to sell a book if the seller can identify the audience and then try to find ways to attract that audience to a novel.  Publishers like genre and bookstores like genre. But here's the thing about fiction. It's not cooperative. There's something inherently rebellious about writing fiction. And there are writers who find themselves, even if they begin writing in a certain genre they love to read, wandering. Sometimes they’ll try to restrict themselves or pull their story back a certain way so they don’t loose their genre place. I think this can deflate certain stories, allow a certain inauthenticity to creep in, rob them of a richness a mix of genres might give.
I think, even though it may make your work harder to sell, you have to tell the story you have to tell. You gotta be who you gotta be. Eventually, readers will find you.
I like to read in many genres. Literary because I love language and character driven stories.  Sci-Fi for ideas—especially the strange ones—fantasy because the world needs magic and is full of mystery, mystery for story and entertainment…Of course I’m most drawn to works that might be presented as belonging to a certain genre but that I see as blending more than one. Kurt Vonnegut, for instance, who mixed realism with science fiction and comedy with drama and social criticism and lord knows what else to create a potent mix. GG Marquez mixed fantastical events and realistic fiction so well critics decided to give him his own genre: magical realism.  Kate Atkinson’s mysteries have elements of literary fiction and her literary fiction has elements of mystery.  These are just a few. There are many.
I love to write. I love to genre blend. I am frustrated that the market often struggles to accept good stories that blend genres but I have to write what excites me. I know there are readers out there like me who love to read books that artfully blend and bend genre and make something different, unusual, unique. I like a lot of books but what I’m looking for are books to fall in love with. 
For me, that’s often a book that doesn’t neatly fit into any category.

Here's a little more on beginnings. What I wish I had sai...

Here's a little more on beginnings. What I wish I had said in this interview that I didn't say (alas, a common thought in interviews I've given and life in general--what I wish I had said--and that may be the title of my next book, in fact) is that knowing the ending is hugely helpful in constructing the book, the structure of the book, and in finding the right place to begin. So I try to remain open to major changes when I revise because it's not until that point that I know the ending (sometimes only roughly and sometimes the actual last paragraph).
http://youtu.be/9d6-ADvUEoQ