Janine Ashbless's Blog, page 124
October 22, 2012
Eyecandy Monday
LARP dryads do not look like this. Ever.So I spent the weekend running round in the woods, smiting monsters, trying to rescue distressed maidens out of trees (boy did THAT go badly), and managing on 3 hours sleep a night. I ache now, though my biceps are like rocks and I appear to have lost 5 lbs - probably all in sweat.
I do not ache as badly as Mr Ashbless, however, who upon seeing me bearing down upon him brandishing my staff, decided to run away instead of standing and dying like a snake-man should (Mr Ashbless' monsters always try to survive ... the wimps.) Haring off into the PITCH DARKNESS, he ran off the edge of the path and face-planted in a ditch full of brambles.
There was blood. He can't walk today :-(
*sigh*
And the moral of the story is - if your wife wants to smack your ass, it's safer to just let her.
But if you prefer to see my more decorous weekends, do pop over to Jennifer Denys' blog, where she spills some of the beans on what erotica writers chat about over tea and cookies :-)
Published on October 22, 2012 07:28
October 21, 2012
Winter is Coming . . .
Published on October 21, 2012 02:00
October 19, 2012
New Roses for old!
One of the great things about e-books, it turns out, is that you can update the cover art anytime you like, to make it look more cool or contemporary or whatever. This is a sneak preview of the new cover for my vampire novel
Red Grow the Roses.
(old cover is still up if you click through, at time of posting)
You like?
I love!
Published on October 19, 2012 02:26
October 17, 2012
Daddy or Chips
I have a bone to pick with the English Language. Yes, the language of William Shakespeare and Milton and Shanna Germain: it's deeply inadequate and it dicks me off.
Consider the following perfectly viable and meaningful statements:
I love chipsI love my Dad and MumI love my wifeI love my mistress I love my child I love my dogI love JesusI love my friends I love my countryI love my gardenI love skydivingI am 80 years old and I love my partner of 40 yearsI am 16 years old and I love my boyfriend of 3 monthsOMG I love Gerard Butler soooo much!
Now, not all those statements are actually true in my case (I have no particular fondness for potato products, for example), but even if they were, only a small child (or, I suppose, someone with serious developmental issues) would ever think that the word "love" as used in those sentences describes the same emotion in every - or indeed any - case.
This is a "daddy or chips" situation. "Love" is used to describe a whole slew of emotions, related only by denoting a positive attitude to the object described. Yet what's the alternative? "Adore"? "Respect"? "Need"? "Enjoy eating"? . . . You run out of synonyms very quickly. We just don't have an adequate range of words to describe what we currently lump under "love."
We'd need dozens of new words, I suspect. And there would always be nuances within each one of those new words. Is the emotion you feel for a child who has just won the school prize the same as for the one who lies in bed all day playing on his Nintendo DS and swearing at you, or the same as for one who is dangerously ill in hospital?
But the thing is, we all muddle by just fine with "love" in conversation or writing because we look at the context. If someone says "I love kittens," we do not assume that that has a romantic or sexual content.
Well, usually. (Sometimes the context of "love" can surprise us.)
Now here's the thing. I think we have a similar "daddy or chips" problem with "Fantasise," even in a purely sexual context. We assume we know what the word means when someone says "I have sexual fantasies about...".
How about:
I fantasise about fucking my boss in the office
If I said that, you would assume that I watch my boss, I make excuses to see him, I would like to fuck him, and that if I was given the chance then I would do it.
But what if I said:
I fantasise about fucking a minotaur.
Do you think that if, by some miracle, a minotaur turned up in my living room one day, my reaction would be "Let's get it on!" Seriously? Because it's not a secret that I do have minotaur fantasies, but believe me if they were real creatures, I'd scream and run and shit my pants just like anyone else.
From the Royal Opera production of The MinotaurThe minotaur fantasy is a fictional fantasy. It does not relate to the real world. It exists only in the interior world of my sexual imagination.
"Ah, but," you might say - "the one about the boss does relate to the real world. If you got the chance, you'd go for it."
HOW THE HELL DO YOU KNOW?
There certainly are sexual fantasies that involve degrees of wishful thinking, planning, and intention. But just because I fantasise about something that might actually happen DOES NOT MEAN THAT I WOULD ACTUALLY WANT TO DO IT IN REALITY. Just like the minotaur, that fantasy can also be completely fictional. It stays in a nice safe place, gets pulled out at the appropriate moment (when I'm heading toward orgasm with my rabbit and need something to trip me over the edge, for example) for joyous contemplation, then gets put away again and ignored.
This, I swear, lies at the heart of all the breast-beating and hair-tearing when it comes to the mainstream success of Fifty Shades of Grey and other BDSM or non-consensual fantasies. "How can millions of women," the well-meaning social observer weeps, "enjoy these sick sexual fantasies? Aren't they betraying their gender and themselves? Whatever happened to decades of feminism? Does it mean they really want to be beaten up, or raped?" And at worst some dickhead will nod sagely and say "There, I knew it - send them back to the kitchen barefoot and pregnant. That's what they really want."
Since when did What you get off on for the minute before orgasm equate to What you really want in life?
I blame the English language. We need separate words for fictional fantasies and intentional fantasies, because otherwise outside observers have no idea what context to take them in.
Worse, we may become confused about our own fantasies. Something pops into our head during sex and we find it hot, and then we may become frightened or guilty or disgusted at ourselves. "Is this the real me?" we ask. "Am I really this sick pervert?" And then it starts to affect our behaviour in non-sexual contexts. And that's bad.
And we start worrying about other people's imaginations. "Are you fantasising about her again, instead of me? Are you looking at porn again? Why aren't I enough for you?"
If we could only accept that there is a part of the sexual imagination that is a separate sphere - sacred space, if you like - that is entirely private, where anything goes, which causes no harm and has no influence over our moral, rational, grown-up lives ... well, then, we would save ourselves and each other a whole lot of grief.
Accept your sexual fantasies. Acknowledge them. They are your business and yours alone. They can be used for pleasure or catharsis, to face up to deep deep fears, to shock and confront, or to explore parts of one's soul. They are fiction. And if you give them sanctioned, separate space to play in, they will not rule you.
So, Mr Shakespeare ... why didn't you give us more words for Love?
Published on October 17, 2012 05:02
October 15, 2012
Eyecandy Monday - bums revisited
By special request, I'm following up last week's feminine bottoms with some male ones. Oh, the work I put in for you guys!
And of course I cannot leave out the classic...
Published on October 15, 2012 03:52
October 14, 2012
Hey, it makes a change from all the sex
Published on October 14, 2012 01:30
October 12, 2012
Frank Papé
Frank Cheyne Papé (1878-1972) was a sort of honorary Kinky Victorian/Edwardian. He contributed to some Golden Age fairytale books, but hit the height of his fame as an illustator in the 1920s when he illustrated the books of James Branch Cabell and Anatole France - yet his style harked back to an earlier era.
There are comparatively few of his illustrations freely available nowadays, as he fell into obscurity and even the details of his life are unclear. But I love his detailed draughtmanship, the way he draws upon non-European dress and styles, and his sense of sensual menace.
And he could be pretty kinky:
Here's a picture of a woman frying up her husbands genitalia and serving them for tea!
But mostly his eroticism is subtler:
From James Branch Cabell's Jurgen
Endpapers from Anatole France's Thais
As I said ... Mostly...
;-)
Published on October 12, 2012 03:45
October 10, 2012
I got mail!
Oh oh oh - look what came through the letterbox! (Actually it didn't, it couldn't possibly have done. I had to answer the door. Wonder what the delivery guy thought of me still in my dressing-gown at 1pm? Also, wonder if said dressing-gown stayed decently shut as I wrestled the box indoors . . .?)
Yes, my lovely lovely Arabian Nights romantic adventure Heart of Flame , available up to now as an e-book, is about to be released in paperback too! It's due out on November 6th, but Samhain Publishing are, as ever, efficient and on-the-ball.
Did you know, this is going to be the first of my book I'm going to be able to give my mother a copy of? Usually she says, "Can I read this one?" and I say, "You won't like it." (Except in regard to
But Mum loves Clan of the Cavebear and that lot, and I reckon the heat in Heart of Flame is probably at a similar level. So there you go: I look forward to her review.
Not.
My brother, btw, refuses to read ANYTHING I write. He says he doesn't want to know what's going on in my head. How very wise!
Hmmm. Do other erotica authors get reviews from their family?
Pre-order Heart of Flame at Samhain : Pre-order at Amazon US : Pre-order at Amazon UK
Published on October 10, 2012 06:43
October 8, 2012
Eyecandy Monday - bums special
Mr Ashbless says that today I have to do a really good Eyecandy Monday to make up for posting so late recently!
So here goes with some apologetic bottoms....
Are we happy now?
:-)
So here goes with some apologetic bottoms....
Are we happy now?
:-)
Published on October 08, 2012 06:57
October 7, 2012
Michael Sabbaton
It's got nothing to do with erotica, but I want to tell the world how much I enjoyed Michael Sabbaton's rendition of H P Lovecraft's The Temple and The Call of Cthulhu at Harrogate Theatre. Try imagining a one-man dramatisation of those two tales: a submarine captain trapped among the corpses of his crew in his powerless U-boat at the bottom of the ocean ... and the perilous piecing together of a worldwide cultic conspiracy ...
If you ever get the chance, go see. He's just brilliant!
Published on October 07, 2012 12:24


