Global Warming Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink: How science can shed new light on the most important "non-debate" of our time (GWPF Report Book 28) Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink: How science can shed new light on the most important "non-debate" of our time by Christopher Booker
56 ratings, 4.66 average rating, 12 reviews
Open Preview
Global Warming Quotes Showing 1-2 of 2
“2009/2010, the ‘consensus’ suffered its three most damaging blows yet: the release of the Climategate emails between the little group of scientists at the heart of the IPCC establishment; the collapse in Copenhagen of the long-planned bid to agree a new global climate treaty, again essentially because of a division between developing nations and the West; a series of scandals that revealed that the most widely-quoted and alarming claims in the 2007 IPCC report had not been based on science at all, but on claims made in press releases and false reports put out by climate activists.”
Christopher Booker, Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink: How science can shed new light on the most important "non-debate" of our time
“But for 30 years the way this has all come about has given expert observers cause for increasing puzzlement. In particular they have questioned: the speed with which the belief that human carbon dioxide emissions were causing the world dangerously to warm came to be proclaimed as being shared by a ‘consensus’ of the world’s climate scientists; the nature and reliability of much of the evidence being cited to support that belief; the failure of global temperatures to rise in accordance with the predictions of the computer models on which the ‘consensus’ ultimately rested. But there was also the peculiarly hostile and dismissive nature of the response by supporters of the ‘consensus’ to those who questioned all this, a group that included many eminent scientists and other experts.”
Christopher Booker, Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink: How science can shed new light on the most important "non-debate" of our time