What Has Government Done to Our Money? and The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
What Has Government Done to Our Money? and The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar What Has Government Done to Our Money? and The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar by Murray N. Rothbard
2,895 ratings, 4.27 average rating, 169 reviews
Open Preview
What Has Government Done to Our Money? and The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar Quotes Showing 1-7 of 7
“lifeblood, not only of our economy, but of civilization”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“And it is certainly true that no Central Bank in recorded history has ever failed. But why not? Because of the sometimes unwritten but very clear rule that it could not be permitted to fail! If governments sometimes allowed private banks to suspend payment, how much more readily would it permit the Central Bank-its own organ-to suspend when in trouble! The precedent was set in Central Banking history when England permitted the Bank of England to suspend in the late eighteenth century, and allowed this suspension for over twenty years.”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“For money as for all other activities of man, “liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order.”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“because "Gresham's Law" proves that "bad money drives out good" from circulation. Hence, the free market cannot be trusted to serve the public in supplying good money. But this formulation rests on a misinterpretation of Gresham`s famous law. The law really says that "money overvalued artificially by government will drive out of circulation artificially undervalued money." Suppose, for example, there are one-ounce gold coins in circulation. After a few years of wear and tear, let us say that some coins weigh only .9 ounces. Obviously, on the free market, the worn coins would circulate at only ninety percent of the value of the full-bodied coins, and the nominal face-value of the former would have to be repudiated. If anything, it will be the "bad" coins that will be driven from the market. But suppose the government decrees that everyone must treat the worn coins as equal to new, fresh coins, and must accept them equally in payment of debts. What has the government really done? It has imposed price control by coercion on the "exchange rate" between the two types of coin. By insisting on the par-ratio when the worn coins should exchange at ten percent discount, it artificially overvalues the worn coins and undervalues new coins. Consequently, everyone will circulate the worn coins, and hoard or export the new. "Bad money drives out good money," then, not on the free market, but as the direct result of governmental intervention in the market.”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“On the free market, then, the various names that units may have are simply definitions of units of weight. When we were "on the gold standard" before 1933, people liked to say that the "price of gold" was "fixed at twenty dollars per ounce of gold." But this was a dangerously misleading way of looking at our money. Actually, "the dollar" was defined as the name for (approximately) 1/20 of an ounce of gold. It was therefore misleading to talk about "exchange rates" of one country's currency for another. The "pound sterling" did not really "exchange" for five "dollars." The dollar was defined as 1/20 of a gold ounce, and the pound sterling was, at that time, defined as the name for 1/4 of a gold ounce, simply traded for 5/20 of a gold ounce. Clearly, such exchanges, and such a welter of names, were confusing and misleading. How they arose is shown below in the chapter on government meddling with money. In a purely free market, gold would simply be exchanged directly as "grams," grains, or ounces, and such confusing names as dollars, franc, etc., would be superfluous.”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“Yet, after all, we are not wedded to a “royal prerogative,” and it is the American concept that sovereignty rests, not in government, but in the people.”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money?
“...большинство стран под воздействием Британии вернулись к золотому стандарту, установив искусственно завышенный курс национальной валюты. В результате была построена типичная финансовая пирамида, в основании которой было золото, на нем - частично обеспеченные золотом доллары, на них - частично обеспеченные долларами фунты и, наконец, частично обеспеченные фунтами национальные валюты континентальной Европы. Это сооружение носило имя «золотодевизного стандарта», а доллар и фунт назывались «ключевыми валютами».”
Murray N. Rothbard, What Has Government Done to Our Money? and The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar