What Kind of Creatures Are We? Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
What Kind of Creatures Are We? (Columbia Themes in Philosophy) What Kind of Creatures Are We? by Noam Chomsky
1,588 ratings, 3.65 average rating, 201 reviews
Open Preview
What Kind of Creatures Are We? Quotes Showing 1-18 of 18
“So understood, anarchism is the inheritor of the classical liberal ideas that emerged from the Enlightenment. It is part of a broader range of libertarian socialist thought and action that ranges from the left anti-Bolshevik Marxism of Anton Pannekoek, Karl Korsch, Paul Mattick, and others, to the anarcho-syndicalism that crucially includes the practical achievements of revolutionary Spain in 1936, reaching further to worker-owned enterprises spreading today in the Rust Belt of the United States, in northern Mexico, in Egypt, and in many other countries, most extensively in the Basque country in Spain, also encompassing the many cooperative movements around the world and a good part of feminist and civil and human rights initiatives.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“If we are biological organisms, not angels, then our cognitive faculties are similar to those called “physical capacities” and should be studied much as other systems of the body are.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“In brief, if we are biological organisms, not angels, much of what we seek to understand might lie beyond our cognitive limits – maybe a true understanding of anything, as Galileo concluded, and Newton in a certain way demonstrated. That cognitive reach has limits is not only a truism but also a fortunate one; if there were no limits to human intelligence, it would lack internal structure and would therefore have no scope: we could achieve nothing by inquiry.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Communication is not a yes-or-no but rather a more-or-less affair.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Language has a creative character: it is typically innovative without bounds, appropriate to circumstance but not caused by them – a crucial distinction – and can engender thoughts in others that they recognise they could have expressed themselves.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Classical liberalism was wrecked on the shoals of capitalism, but”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“the man whose life is spent in performing a few simple operations, of which the effects too are, perhaps, always the same, or very nearly the same, has no occasion to exert his understanding… and generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to be…. But in every improved and civilized society this is the state into which the labouring poor, that is, the great body of the people, must necessarily fall, unless government takes some pains to prevent it.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“In reality, a few years later a North–South compact permitted the slaveholding states to reinstitute a form of slavery by effectively criminalizing black life, providing a cheap and disciplined labor force for much of the industrial revolution, a system that persisted until World War II created the need for free labor. The ugly history is being reenacted under the vicious “drug war” of the past generation, since Ronald Reagan.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“People live and suffer and endure in the real world of existing society, and any decent person should favor employing what means are available to safeguard and benefit them, even if a long-term goal is to displace these devices and construct preferable alternatives.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Languages are not tools that humans design but biological objects, like the visual or immune or digestive system.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“It is, indeed, virtual dogma that the function of language is communication.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Education should not be a matter of pouring water into a vessel [...] it should be conceived as laying out a string along which learners proceed in their own ways, exercising and improving their creative capacities and imaginations, and experiencing the joy of discovery.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“What I hear as noise is perceived as music by my teenage grandchildren, at a fairly primitive level of perceptual experience. And”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“This shriveled conception of democracy has solid roots. The founding fathers were much concerned about the hazards of democracy. In the debates of the Constitutional Convention, the main framer, James Madison, warned of these hazards. Naturally taking England as his model, he observed that “in England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place,” undermining the right to property. To ward off such injustice, “our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation,” arranging voting patterns and checks and balances so as “to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority,” a prime task of decent government.19”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“Tis to work and have such pay As just keeps life from day to day In your limbs, as in a cell For the tyrants’ use to dwell, … ’Tis to be slave in soul And to hold no strong control Over your own wills, but be All that others make of ye.”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“There is no contradiction here. People live and suffer and endure in the real world of existing society, and any decent person should favor employing what means are available to safeguard and benefit them, even if a long-term goal is to displace these devices and construct preferable alternatives. In”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“truisms at least have the merit of being true, which distinguishes them from a good deal of political discourse. And”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?
“In the modern period, similar ideas are reiterated, for example, by an important political thinker who described what he called “a definite trend in the historic development of mankind,” which strives for “the free unhindered unfolding of all the individual and social forces in life.” The author was Rudolf Rocker, a leading twentieth-century anarchist thinker and activist.3 He was outlining an anarchist tradition culminating in his view in anarcho-syndicalism—in European terms, a variety of “libertarian socialism.” These”
Noam Chomsky, What Kind of Creatures Are We?