Tavistock Institute Quotes

“All of these techniques share an ontological purpose: to manipulate perceptions and to re-create reality. Once that Pandora’s box was open, there was no closing it again. The temptation was too great. For those who wanted to play God, there was the next best thing: one could play with the elements of creation in such a way that magical transformations would take place. As the men of the OSS, CIA, military intelligence and with Tavistock’s oversight developed from the armchair scholars that most of them were before the war years into soldiers fighting on all fronts of the Cold War, they became, in a very real sense, magicians. “The CIA mind control projects themselves represented an assault on consciousness and reality that has not been seen in history since the age of the philosopher-kings and their court alchemists.”9”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Almost 22% believe they have seen an Unidentified Flying Object themselves.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“In the 1920s, the Rockefeller family bankrolled the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography, which later would form a central pillar in the Third Reich.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“If fear and destructiveness are the major emotional sources of fascism, eros belongs mainly to democracy.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Please understand, mainstream news limits your understanding of the world by what it chooses not to report and ignore.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“When you watch TV, the right hemisphere is twice as active as the left, which in itself is a neurological anomaly. “The crossover from left to right releases a surge of the body’s natural opiates: endorphins, which include beta-endorphins and enkephalins. Endorphins are structurally identical to opium and its derivatives (morphine, codeine, heroin, etc.).”1 In other words, your television works as a high-tech drug delivery system, and we all feel its effects. Another effect of watching television is that the “higher brain regions such as the midbrain and the neo-cortex, are shut down, and most activity shifts to the limbic system, your lower brain region. The lower or reptile brain simply stands poised to react to the environment using deeply embedded ‘fight or flight’ response programs. Moreover, these lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a job performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real, releasing appropriate hormones and so on.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“In a 1961 lecture, Aldous Huxley had described this police state as “the final revolution” – a “dictatorship without tears,” where people “love their servitude.” He said the goal was to produce “a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will, in fact, have their liberties taken away … but … will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing ... enhanced by pharmacological methods.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“So, what is it that makes an ‘open conspiracy’ open, as in placed there in plain sight for everyone to see? Larry Hecht explains: “what makes the ‘open conspiracy’ open, is not the laying out of some secret master plan, not the revealing of the membership roster of some inner sanctum of the rich and powerful, which the typical deluded populist supposes to be the secret to power in the world. It is, rather, the understanding that ideas, philosophy and culture, control history. What constitutes a conspiracy, for good or evil, is a set of ideas which embody a concept of what it is to be human, and a conception of man’s role in universal history.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“A little known fact about Interpol is that it grew out of anticipation of the First World War, set up by the House of Rothschild in Vienna in 1923. The family felt it needed a special intelligence organization to watch over the interests of bankers, who were financing both sides of the war. In order not to make things look too suspicious, they called on Prince Albert I of Monaco to invite lawyers, judges and police officers from several countries to discuss international co-operation against crime.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“The Rockefeller Foundation, which had been heavily funding Tavistock and Tavistock members since 1934, readily accepted, and the Tavistock Clinic was transformed into the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.”69 The Institute developed national and international operations under the heading “operation research.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“One of the key proposals coming from the Rockefeller camp was to push a “democratic” employee stock ownership plan, because “it makes the worker a capitalist in his viewpoint and this renders him a conservative and immune from radical ideals,” and produces greater productivity, which is the aim.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Rees and Tavistock understood, through their extensive engagement in group work, that manipulation based upon bourgeois conceptions of the outside world as magical (mother’s fears) was fundamental to mass control. In other words, the Institute looked for methods by which to manage populations by exploiting their ideology. By first creating numerous social groups and then setting such groups into competition contingency, and making all gains contingent on winning these at the expense of the contingency groups, a self-policing fascist social order could be established. It was merely necessary to atomize the subject population, employing an “armamentarium of sociological and psychiatric weaponry to the effect of so dividing the people against itself,”62 setting race against race, language group against language group, women’s ‘self-interest’ against men as ‘oppressors,’ further subdivide them by professional category and so on, and to further subdivide them into small territorial community ‘self-interest’ groups, that the military forces are “never confronted with more than a small material force represented by a hard core resistant to a generally effective combination of sociological and psychiatric weapons of control.”63”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Rees’ logic is clear. For true mental health, there must be a complete transformation of society along the lines of rational selection. But, as he laments in his book, “many don´t see reality this way, including most workers who believe that any method of selection is a mechanism by which the wicked capitalist aims to get more work out of the workers, and that argument dies hard.”8 In the Reesian world-view, such nay-sayers, along with anyone who engages in “strikes” or “subversive activity,” are themselves neurotic, desperately “in need of treatment, but unfortunately unable to see that they are ill. In such a world of unwitting neurotics, psychiatry, the only arbiter of sanity, can be exercised only by a cabal in every country, groups of psychiatrists, linked to each other” prepared to muster all their weapons and influence for a move “into the political and governmental field.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Drug counterculture was precisely the weapon that the Frankfurt School and their fellow-travellers employed, over the next 50 years, to create a cultural paradigm shift away from the so-called ‘authoritarian’ matrix of man in the living image of God, and the superiority of the republican form of nation-state over all other forms of political organization.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“Many young people became “Deadheads” following the Grateful Dead on tour. Veteran investigative journalist Jim Keith writes: “An FBI internal memo from 1968 mentions the employment of the Grateful Dead as an avenue ‘to channel youth dissent and rebellion into more benign and non-threatening directions.”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses

“if there are globes in the heaven similar to our earth, do we vie with them over who occupies the better portion of the universe? For if their globes are nobler, we are not the noblest of rational creatures. Then how can all things be for man’s sake? How can we be the masters of God’s handiwork?”
― Daniel Estulin, Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses