The World Crisis Quotes
The World Crisis: 1916–1918
by
Winston S. Churchill209 ratings, 4.44 average rating, 9 reviews
Open Preview
The World Crisis Quotes
Showing 1-29 of 29
“I conceive myself entitled to repeat, now that the results are known, the opinions which I put on record before all these battles were fought. I wrote to the Prime Minister on December 29, 1914, as follows: ‘I think it quite possible that neither side will have the strength to penetrate the other’s lines in the Western theatre… Without attempting to take a final view, my impression is that the position of both armies is not likely to undergo any decisive change.’ And in June, 1915: ‘It is a fair general conclusion that the deadlock in the West will continue for some time and the side which risks most to pierce the lines of the other will put itself at a disadvantage.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“In the first three months of actual fighting from the last week in August to the end of November, when the German drive against the Channel ports had come to an end and the first great invasion was definitely arrested, the French lost in killed, prisoners and wounded 854,0001 men. In”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“millions shed their blood or perished in the greatest of all human contentions some twenty years ago. Merciful oblivion draws its veils; the crippled limp away; the mourners fall back into the sad twilight of memory. New youth is here to claim its rights, and the perennial stream flows forward even in the battle zone, as if the tale were all a dream.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The fighting man shall from the sun Take warmth, and life from the growing earth; Speed with the light-foot wind to run, And with the trees to newer birth, And find when fighting shall be done, Great rest and fullness after dearth.
The thundering line of battle stands, And in the air Death moans and sings; But day shall clasp him with strong hands, And night shall fold him in soft wings.’ JULIAN GRENFELL. Flanders, April, 1915.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
The thundering line of battle stands, And in the air Death moans and sings; But day shall clasp him with strong hands, And night shall fold him in soft wings.’ JULIAN GRENFELL. Flanders, April, 1915.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Even in famine the seed corn must be preserved.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“To fight in defence of his native land is the first duty of the citizen. But to fight in defence of some one else’s native land is a different proposition. It may also be a sacred obligation, but it involves a higher conception.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Those who have served in small ships will realize the skill, faithfulness and hardihood required to carry out this duty day after day, month after month, in wild weather and wintry seas without breakdown or failure.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Of all the tasks ever set to a Navy none could have appeared more baffling than that of sheltering this enormous traffic and groping deep below the surface of the sea for the deadly elusive foe. It was in fact a game of blind man’s buff in an unlimited space of three dimensions.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Depend upon it, Sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.’ DR. JOHNSON”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“if only the Generals had not been content to fight machine-gun bullets with the breasts of gallant men, and think that that was waging war.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“high standards of experience, of official routine, and of method, which are the qualifications of the Civil Service.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Such was the picture presented to the public, and such was the mood which ruled. It was not however entirely in accordance with the facts; and facts, especially in war, are stubborn things.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The flower of that generous manhood which quitted peaceful civilian life in every kind of workaday occupation, which came at the call of Britain, and as we may still hope, at the call of humanity, and came from the most remote parts of her Empire, was shorn away for ever in 1916. Unconquerable except by death, which they have conquered, they have set up a monument of native virtue which will command the wonder, the reverence and the gratitude of our island people as long as we endure as a nation among men.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“It is not every councillor who, like the Bastard in ‘King John,’ will say to his sovereign: ‘But if you be afeared to hear the worst, Then let the worst unheard fall on your head.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“there is in time of peace organized opposition which with tireless industry assembles all the worst possible facts, draws from them the most alarming conclusions, and imputes the most unworthy motives.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The temptation to tell a Chief in a great position the things he most likes to hear is one of the commonest explanations of mistaken policy.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The more morally impossible a military operation, the better chance it will have of success if it is physically practicable. Surprise—that sovereign talisman of War—springs from the doing of the exact thing the enemy is certain will never be tried.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The Truths of War are absolute, but the principles governing their application have to be deduced on each occasion from the circumstances, which are always different; and in consequence no rules are any guide to action. Study of the past is invaluable as a means of training and storing the mind, but it is no help without selective discernment of the particular facts and of their emphasis, relation and proportion.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The uncontrollable momentum of war, the inadequacy of unity and leadership among Allies, the tides of national passion, nearly always force improvident action upon Governments or Commanders”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The use of force for the waging of war is not to be regulated simply by firm character and text-book maxims.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“the war in the West resolved itself into two periods of supreme battle, divided from each other by a three-years’ siege.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“Those two impostors,’ Triumph and Disaster, never played their pranks more shamelessly than in the Great War. When men have done their duty and done their best, have shirked no labour and flinched from no decision that it was their task to take, there is no disgrace in eventual personal failure. They are but good comrades who fall in the earlier stages of an assault, which others, profiting by their efforts and experiences, ultimately carry to victory.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“These volumes will leave the reader in no doubt about the opinion of their author. From first to last it is contended that once the main armies were in deadlock in France the true strategy for both sides was to attack the weaker partners in the opposite combination with the utmost speed and ample force. According to this view, Germany was unwise to attack France in August, 1914, and especially unwise to invade Belgium for that purpose. She should instead have struck down Russia and left France to break her teeth against the German fortress and trench lines. Acting thus she would probably have avoided war with the British Empire, at any rate during the opening, and for her most important, phase of the struggle. The first German decision to attack the strongest led to her defeat at the Marne and the Yser, and left her baffled and arrested with the ever-growing might of an implacable British Empire on her hands. Thus 1914 ended. But in 1915 Germany turned to the second alternative, and her decision was attended by great success. Leaving the British and French to shatter their armies against her trench lines in France, Germany marched and led her allies against Russia, with the result that by the autumn enormous territories had been conquered from Russia; all the Russian system of fortresses and strategic railways was in German hands, while the Russian armies were to a large extent destroyed and the Russian State grievously injured. The only method by which the Allies could rescue Russia was by forcing the Dardanelles. This was the only counter-stroke that could be effective. If it had succeeded it would have established direct and permanent contact between Russia and her Western allies, it would have driven Turkey, or at the least Turkey in Europe, out of the war, and might well have united the whole of the Balkan States, Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria and Roumania, against Austria and Germany. Russia would thus have received direct succour, and in addition would have experienced an enormous relief through the pressure which the combined Balkan States would instantly have applied to Austria-Hungary. However, the narrow and local views of British Admirals and Generals and of the French Headquarters had obstructed this indispensable manéuvre. Instead of a clear strategic conception being clothed and armed with all that the science of staffs and the authority of Commanders could suggest, it had been resisted, hampered, starved and left to languish. The time gained by this mismanagement and the situation created by the Russian defeats enabled Germany in September to carry the policy of attacking the weaker a step further. Falkenhayn organized an attack upon Serbia. Bulgaria was gained to the German side, Serbia was conquered, and direct contact was established between the Central Empires and Turkey. The”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“It was their own offensive, not ours, that consummated their ruin. They were worn down not by Joffre, Nivelle and Haig, but by Ludendorff. See”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“In the series of great offensive pressures which Joffre delivered during the whole of the spring and autumn of 1915, the French suffered nearly 1,300,000 casualties. They inflicted upon the Germans in the same period and the same operations 506,000 casualties. They gained no territory worth mentioning, and no strategic advantages of any kind. This was the worst year of the Joffre régime. Gross as were the mistakes of the Battle of the Frontiers, glaring as had been the errors of the First Shock, they were eclipsed by the insensate obstinacy and lack of comprehension which, without any large numerical superiority, without adequate artillery or munitions, without any novel mechanical method, without any pretence of surprise or manœuvre, without any reasonable hope of victory, continued to hurl the heroic but limited manhood of France at the strongest entrenchments, at uncut wire and innumerable machine guns served with cold skill. The responsibilities of this lamentable phase must be shared in a subordinate degree by Foch, who under Joffre’s orders, but as an ardent believer, conducted the prolonged Spring offensive in Artois, the most sterile and prodigal of all.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The Germans, out of a population of under 70 millions, mobilized during the war for military service 13¼ million persons. Of these, according to the latest German official figures for all fronts including the Russian, over 7 millions suffered death, wounds or captivity, of whom nearly 2 millions perished.15 France, with a population of 38 millions, mobilized a little over 8 million persons. This however includes a substantial proportion of African troops outside the French population basis. Of these approximately 5 millions became casualties, of whom 1½ millions lost their lives. The British Empire, out of a white population of 60 millions, mobilized nearly 9½ million persons and sustained over 3 million casualties including nearly a million deaths. The British totals are not directly comparable with those of France and Germany. The proportion of coloured troops is greater. The numbers who fell in theatres other than the western, and those employed on naval service, are both much larger. The French and German figures are however capable of very close comparison. Both the French and German armies fought with their whole strength from the beginning to the end of the war. Each nation made the utmost possible demand upon its population. In these circumstances it is not surprising that the official French and German figures tally with considerable exactness. The Germans mobilized 19 per cent. of their entire population, and the French, with their important African additions, 21 per cent. Making allowance for the African factor, it would appear that in the life-and-death struggle both countries put an equal strain upon their manhood. If this basis is sound—and it certainly appears reasonable—the proportion of French and German casualties to persons mobilized displays an even more remarkable concordance. The proportion of German casualties to total mobilized is 10 out of every 19, and that of the French 10 out of every 16. The ratios of deaths to woundings in Germany and France are almost exactly equal, viz. 2 to 5. Finally these figures yield a division of German losses between the western and all other fronts of approximately 3 to 1 both in deaths and casualties. All”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“When on October 5, 1917, the Passchendaele offensive was sinking into the mire, and the Cabinet sought to bring it to a conclusion, Robertson was compelled to rest himself upon ‘the unsatisfactory state of the French armies and of the general political situation in France, which was still far from reassuring’;10 and again: ‘The original object of the campaign—the clearance of the Belgian coast—was seen to be doubtful of attainment long before the operations terminated, owing to the bad weather experienced and to the delay in starting caused by the change of plan earlier in the year. But, as already explained, there were strong reasons why activity had to be maintained. We must give the French armies time to recover their strength and morale, make every effort to keep Russia in the field in some form or other, and try to draw enemy troops to Flanders which might otherwise be sent against Italy, especially after her defeat at Caporetto. All these purposes of distraction were achieved, and in addition heavy losses were inflicted upon the German armies.’11 For these ‘purposes of distraction’ the killing, maiming or capture of over 400,000 British soldiers was apparently considered a reasonable price to pay. It appears however that although Robertson drove the Cabinet remorselessly forward, he had convinced himself that none of the British attacks for which he bore responsibility in 1915 and in 1916 had had any chance of decisive success. ‘With respect to the alleged error of always attacking where the enemy was strongest,’ he writes,12 ‘I could not refrain from saying that the greatest of all errors was that of not providing before the war an army adequate to enforce the policy adopted…. Until this year we have not had the means to attack with the hope of getting a decision,13 and therefore we have had no choice in the point of attack.’ He used these words on his own avowal on June 21, 1917; so that the highest expert authority responsible for procuring the support of the Cabinet to two years of offensive operations had already convinced himself that up till 1917 the British Army ‘had not the means to attack with the hope of getting a decision.’ Undeterred however by this slowly-gained revelation, he proceeded to drive the unfortunate Ministers to authorize the prolongation into the depths of winter of the Passchendaele offensive.”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The Western Front was at all times, according to this view, the decisive theatre of the war, and all the available forces should continually have been concentrated there. The only method of waging war on the Western Front was by wearing down the enemy by ‘killing Germans in a war of attrition.’ This we are assured was always Sir Douglas Haig’s scheme; he pursued it unswervingly throughout his whole Command. Whether encouraged or impeded by the Cabinet, his policy was always the same: ‘Gather together every man and gun and wear down the enemy by constant and if possible by ceaseless attacks.’ This in the main, it is contended, he succeeded in doing, with the result, it is claimed, that in August, 1918, the enemy, at last worn down, lost heart, crumpled, and finally sued for peace. Viewing the events in retrospect, Colonel Boraston invites us to see, not only each of the various prolonged offensives as an integral operation, but the whole four years, 1915, 1916, 1917 and 1918, as if they were one single enormous battle every part of which was a necessary factor in the final victory. We wore the enemy down, we are told, upon the Somme in 1916, we wore him down at Arras in the spring, we continued to wear him down at Passchendaele in the winter of 1917. If the army had been properly reinforced by the politicians we should have persisted in wearing him down in the spring of 1918. Finally, as the fruits of all this process of attrition and ‘killing Germans’ by offensive operations, the enemy’s spirit was quelled, his man power was exhausted, and the war was won. Thus a great design, measured, foreseen and consciously prepared, reached its supreme accomplishment. Such is the theory. These views are supported in the two important”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
“The strategic aspect of General Joffre’s policy was not less stultified than the administrative. The easterly and north-easterly attacks into which his four Armies of the Right and Centre were impetuously launched, were immediately stopped and hurled back with a slaughter so frightful that it has never yet been comprehended by the world. His”
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
― The World Crisis, Vol. 3 Part 1 and Part 2
