An Introduction to the Old Testament Quotes

“In the end, ethical interpretation of the Bible means to think critically about how our practices of textual engagement might help us to become both more human and more humane. We are constantly crafting and recrafting ourselves, and the goal is to do so in such a way that we contribute, even if only incrementally, more to the good in the world than to the bad. We think of the point made by Tim Beal (2011, 184), who notes that the etymological root of the word “religion” is typically taken to be the Latin religare, from the verb ligare, meaning “to bind” or “to attach” (ergo our word “ligament”). Religion, in this line of thinking, has to do with being bound to certain doctrines, ideas, or practices. But Beal points out that there is another etymology, suggested by the ancient Roman politician and philosopher Cicero, who proposed that religion derives from the Latin relegere, itself a form of the root legere, “to read” (ergo our words “legible” and even “lectionary”). “Re-ligion” becomes then a process of “re-reading,” and the shaping of a religious life (or more broadly a moral life, or more broadly still just a life) is a continual process of engagement with tradition in the context of present realities. We spoke early on in this book about the “traditioning” process that lies behind the biblical text, the way in which earlier texts and traditions are taken up in later contexts in which they are both preserved and transformed. As a result, Scripture itself presents a rich variety of voices, and sometimes one author or text disagrees with the other. It is an ongoing conversation rather than a set of settled doctrines. And it is our privilege to be invited into that conversation, to become ourselves part of the traditioning process, seeking to bring an unfolding understanding of the good into our present reality.”
― Walter Brueggemann, An Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Christian Imagination

“It is to be noted concerning the commands that a conventional Christian stereotype of “Jewish legalism” completely misses the point of
what the commands intend and what they effect (E. Sanders 1977). There is little
doubt that such dismissive caricatures of the commands of the Torah on the part
of Gentile culture have succumbed to Enlightenment notions of freedom that
culminate not in covenantal fidelity but in autonomy, a posture from which it is
impossible to maintain a distinct, primal communal identity.”
― Walter Brueggemann, An Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Christian Imagination

“It is clear that human agents have been at work through the entire traditioning process. They witness to the will, purpose, and presence of YHWH, who remains inscrutably hidden in and through the text and yet who discloses YHWH’s own holy self through that same text.”
― Walter Brueggemann, An Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Christian Imagination