The Three Languages of Politics Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
The Three Languages of Politics The Three Languages of Politics by Arnold Kling
1,127 ratings, 3.88 average rating, 165 reviews
The Three Languages of Politics Quotes Showing 1-11 of 11
“In politics, I claim that progressives, conservatives, and libertarians are like tribes speaking different languages. The language that resonates with one tribe does not connect with the others. As a result, political discussions do not lead to agreement. Instead, most political commentary serves to increase polarization. The points that people make do not open the minds of people on the other side. They serve to close the minds of the people on one’s own side.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“One of my prescriptions for slow political thinking is to try to avoid telling yourself, “I’m reasonable, they’re not.” Instead, I would suggest the following rule of thumb. The only person you are qualified to pronounce unreasonable is yourself.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“Groups must balance the need to enforce norms with the need to adapt. If the group is unable to enforce social norms, then there will be too much cheating, and cooperation will break down. However, if the group is too rigid in its social norms, then it will fail to adapt to new circumstances.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“Americans today, ideology has become a powerful marker of identity. Ps, Cs, and Ls are now rivalrous, hostile tribes. As such, they have developed linguistic differences and negative stereotypes of one another, which the three-axis model can help to articulate. Within a tribe, political language is used to reassure others of one's loyalty to the tribe, to lift one's status within the tribe, and to whip up hostility against other tribes.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics
“In his important book The Revolt of the Public, Martin Gurri points out that the latest communications media have empowered new popular movements everywhere, from the Arab Spring to Brexit. Gurri paints a picture of a nihilistic public, offended by what they see as a corrupt and inept ruling class.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“Thus, I would view political disagreement as a social phenomenon rather than an individual one. We naturally tend to organize into tribe-like groups. Tribes differentiate in part on the basis of shared beliefs, including political beliefs. Our inclination to seek high status in a tribe leads us to become loyal to the beliefs of our tribe. This results in persistent disagreement.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics
“Consider three goals that a political pundit might have. One goal might be to open the minds of people on the other side. Another goal might be to open the minds of people on the pundit’s own side. A third goal might be to close the minds of people on the pundit’s own side. Nearly all the punditry that appears in the various media today serves only the third goal.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“As a social phenomenon, political discussions invite us to position ourselves relative to others. We want to raise our individual status in our own tribe, and we want to reduce the status of other tribes. By framing issues in terms of our preferred axis, we appear to accomplish both of these goals. We impress the people who agree with us, and we delegitimize those who disagree.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“For politically engaged Americans today, ideology has become a powerful marker of identity. It is useful to think of progressives, conservatives, and libertarians as rivalrous, hostile tribes. As such, they have developed linguistic differences and negative stereotypes of one another, which the three-axes model can help to articulate. In a tribe, political language is used to assert the moral superiority of one’s tribe. Communicating using the preferred axis of the tribe is good for reassuring others of one’s loyalty to the tribe, for lifting a person’s status in the tribe by pleasing those who agree with him or her, and for whipping up hostility against other tribes. What political language is not good for is persuading people outside one’s tribe or improving relations with them.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“The three axes allow each tribe to assert moral superiority. The progressive asserts moral superiority by denouncing oppression and accusing others of failing to do so. The conservative asserts moral superiority by denouncing barbarism and accusing others of failing to do so. The libertarian asserts moral superiority by denouncing coercion and accusing others of failing to do so.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides
“The only person you are qualified to pronounce unreasonable is yourself.”
Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides