Nuevas evidencias científicas de la existencia de Dios Quotes

“es que le pida a ese Dios en quien no cree que le de la fe que no tiene. Coincido con William Lane Craig508 cuando dice: «Si Ud. está buscando sinceramente a Dios, Dios le hará Su existencia evidente».”
― Álex Rosal, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“Preguntar por la causa de lo que por definición no tiene causa se parece mucho a una declaración pública de incapacidad intelectiva.”
― Álex Rosal, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“Fe es «un acto del entendimiento que asiente a la verdad divina bajo el imperio de la voluntad movida por la gracia de Dios507».”
― Álex Rosal, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“no quiero que el universo”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“Podría no haber Universo, sin embargo, como es evidente que lo hay, necesariamente la explicación del Universo está fuera de él.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“el aparente ajuste de precisión excepcional de las condiciones del universo para el desarrollo de
la vida sugieren que un Creador inteligente es el responsable». William Phillips28”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS CIENTÍFICAS DE LA EXISTENCIA DE DIOS

“the more religious he is; in the study on the Nobel Prize Laureates to which we referred a little earlier, 90 percent of them identified with a religion and two-thirds of them were Christians.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“one analysis of the Nobel Prize Laureates of the last hundred years concludes that only 10 percent of the prizewinners in scientific matters were not theists, while 35 percent of the Nobel Prize winners in Literature considered themselves atheists.651 The last study conducted by the Pew Research Center652 in 2009 shows that only a minority of the scientists who were consulted do not believe in the existence of a Creator God (41 percent).”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“it is advisable to keep in mind that evil exists and also persons who are eminently perverse.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Thus, the man who has been considered the best English novelist of the twentieth century started to convert to theism (and Catholicism), but this did not prevent him from recognizing that “no one could believe in a God whom he could understand completely” — an admission that is honorable for its humility and brilliant for its logic, since, if our limited intellect were capable of embracing God, He would be nothing but a limited being and therefore not God.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Not having all the answers about the nature of God, or having doubts about His properties, in no way diminishes the certainty of His existence. Sometimes theist believers fall away from this certainty because they do not “understand” God and all His designs (the existence of evil in the world is, in my opinion, the greatest difficulty”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Aristotle explains that “there necessarily is eternal changeless primary being . . . the first [cause] of all things,”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“The “new” atheists claim that science and faith are opposed to each other, using arguments that demonstrate their scientific ignorance almost as much as their antireligious prejudices.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“When we see structures and intentional design we suppose that an intelligent being created them.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Sam Harris — another vehement exponent of the new atheism — found himself forced to admit that “a variety of experiments suggest that children are predisposed to assume both design and intention behind natural events — leaving many psychologists and anthropologists to believe that children, left entirely to their own devices, would invent some conception of God.”512 From this understanding comes — it seems to us — the new atheists’ obsession with making sure that the state forces skeptical ideological training on children from an early age.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“St. Thomas’s definition of faith is simply ingenious; it is worth repeating. An act of belief is “an act of the intellect assenting to the divine truth at the command of the will moved by the grace of God.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“St. Thomas adds that “hence it is proper to the believer to think with assent: so that the act of believing is distinguished from all the other acts of the intellect, which are about the true or the false.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“All of Christian tradition has preached “crede ut intelligas” (believe in order to understand), balanced with “intellige ut credas” (understand in order to believe); in other words, you have to prepare the intellect in order to uphold the faith.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“the thesis that we propose is that, in order to believe in the existence of a Personal Being Who is the Creator, it is not necessary to have a religious faith; all that is necessary is to think.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Where no guiding ideals are left to point the way, the scale of values disappears and with it the meaning of our deeds and sufferings, and at the end can lie only negation and despair. Religion is therefore the foundation of ethics, and ethics the presupposition of life.489 — Werner Heisenberg”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Mr. Collins made the same transition from atheism to theism and Christianity. In his own words: “I began a journey to try to understand why intellectually sophisticated people could actually believe in God — and to my dismay, found that atheism turned out to be the least rational of all the choices.” He ended up realizing that “belief in God . . . was the most rational choice available. Furthermore, I saw in the very science that I so loved something that I had missed — the evidence that seemed to cry out for a Creator: there is something instead of nothing, the universe had a beginning, it follows elegant mathematical laws. . . . God must be an amazing physicist and mathematician.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“the human genome gestated in 1984 in the United States, and the experimental work of the project began in 1990. A decade later, around the middle of the year 2000, the first draft was published, and the project director, Francis Collins,”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“DNA of our species, the hereditary code of life. This . . . text was 3 billion letters long, and written in a strange and cryptographic four-letter code. Such is the amazing complexity of the information carried within each cell of the human body, that a live reading of that code at a rate of one letter per second would take thirty-one years, even if reading continued day and night.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Theists have nothing to fear from inflationary cosmology or the string-theoretic multiverse. Indeed, every known version of these models requires that the universe/multiverse begin to exist, and thus have a transcendent cause.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“The impossibility that life can have arisen from nothing in this universe is the same in any other universe that could be dreamed up, and therefore the idea of a “multiverse” is — in most cases — a smokescreen that only puts off the inevitable logical inference.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“the multiverse theory is not scientific. It is a belief, and furthermore, a “not very serious” belief: “This thesis is not taken seriously, however much the idea of parallel universes flourished in the field of science fiction.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Confronted with the same problem as Mr. Crick, namely, that it turns out to be impossible for DNA to have appeared purely by chance, he proposed another new theory . . . well, not so new, but it is in its application to biology: the multiverse. Or, to put it another way, if it is impossible in this universe, let us multiply the universes and in this way, we will claim that it is possible.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“He did not deem fit to explain to us who creates those more highly evolved beings; for the moment, he just pushed aside the problem of the existence of a Creator — I suppose with the hope that we might lose sight of it. Every time this theory is mentioned, I have to recall Chesterton’s remark: “The problem with not believing in God is not that man ends up believing in nothing. It is much worse. He starts to believe in anything.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“Francis Crick477 was a British molecular biologist and co-discoverer with James Watson478 of the structure of DNA, for which he received the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine. Mr. Crick was a militant atheist, a Christianophobe,479 and in favor of eugenics,480 an idea that he blamed religion for delaying (and on that point, he may have been right). He recognized the impossibility of DNA being produced by chance, and since he considered some intelligent cause necessary for it, he proposed his famous hypothesis of “panspermia,” which came to mean that life on Earth was sown by intelligent extraterrestrials. Yes, you read that correctly, by extraterrestrials.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

“The fact that the universe has a beginning and that therefore there is always a time limit has posed a major problem for skeptical authors: “But we only have so much time before we bump into the 3.5-billion-year barrier when the first cell appeared.”
― José Carlos González-Hurtado, New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God