Open Letters Quotes

Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 by Václav Havel
440 ratings, 4.28 average rating, 49 reviews
Open Letters Quotes Showing 1-3 of 3
“Sooner or later, however, a writer (or at least a writer of my type) finds himself at a crossroads: he has exhausted his initial experience of the world and the ways of expressing it and he must decide how to proceed from there. He can, of course, seek ever more brilliant ways of saying the things he has already said; that is, he can essentially repeat himself. Or he can rest in the position he achieved in his first burst of creativity, subordinate everything he learned to the interests of consolidating that position, and thus assure himself a place on Parnassus.

But he has a third option: he can abandon everything proven, step beyond his initial experience of the world, with which he is by now all too familiar, liberate himself from what binds him to his own tradition, to public expectation and to his own established position, and try for a new and more mature self-definition, one that corresponds to his present and authentic experience of the world. In short, he can find his "second wind." Anyone who chooses this route—the only one (if one wishes to go on writing) that genuinely makes sense—will not, as a rule, have an easy time of it. At this stage in his life, a writer is no longer a blank sheet of paper, and some things are hard to part with. His original elan, self-confidence, and spontaneous openness have gone, but genuine maturity is not yet in sight; he must, in fact, start over again, but in essentially more difficult conditions.”
Václav Havel, Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990
“True enough, order prevails.... What prevails is order without life.

True enough, the country is calm. Calm as a morgue or a grave, would you not say?”
Václav Havel, Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990
“Every meaningful cultural act -- wherever it takes place -- is unquestionably good in and of itself, simply because it exists and because it offers something to someone. Yet can this value 'in itself' really be separated from 'the common good'? Is not one an integral part of the other from the start? Does not the bare fact that a work of art has meant something to someone -- even if only for a moment, perhaps to a single person -- already somehow change, however minutely, the overall condition for the better? ... Can we separate the awakening human soul from what it always, already is -- an awakening human community?”
Václav Havel, Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990