Where the Conflict Really Lies Quotes
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
by
Alvin Plantinga1,027 ratings, 4.02 average rating, 160 reviews
Open Preview
Where the Conflict Really Lies Quotes
Showing 1-3 of 3
“there is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and theistic religion, but superficial concord and deep conflict between science and naturalism.”
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
“Dawkins claims that the living world came to be by way of unguided evolution: “the Evidence of Evolution,” he says, “Reveals a Universe Without Design.” What he actually argues, however, is that there is a Darwinian series for contemporary life forms. As we have seen, this argument is inconclusive; but even if it were air-tight it wouldn’t show, of course, that the living world, let alone the entire universe, is without design. At best it would show, given a couple of assumptions, that it is not astronomically improbable that the living world was produced by unguided evolution and hence without design. But the argument form p is not astronomically improbable therefore p is a bit unprepossessing.”
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
“Of course defeaters can be themselves be defeated; so couldn’t you get a defeater for this defeater—a defeater-defeater? Maybe by doing some science—for example, determining by scientific means that her cognitive faculties are reliable? Couldn’t she go to the MIT cognitive-reliability laboratory for a check-up? Clearly that won’t help. Obviously that course would presuppose that her cognitive faculties are reliable; she’d be relying on the accuracy of her faculties in believing there is such a thing as MIT, that she has in fact consulted scientists, that they have given her a clean bill of cognitive health, and so on.”
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
― Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
