The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture Quotes

“Wilhelm Rau has compiled the Vedic references to pottery from the oldest strands of the Black Yajurveda and found that although the potter’s wheel was known, it was hand made pottery that was prescribed for the ritual sphere. This suggests to him that “the more primitive technique persisted in the ritual sphere while in secular life more advanced methods of potting had already been adopted.” Should this assumption be correct, “we can pin down the transition from hand-made to wheel-thrown pottery, as far as the Aryans are concerned, (down) to the earlier phases of Vedic times” (Rau 1974, 141).12 Of relevance to this line of argument is a verse from the Taittīrlya Samhitā (4, 5, 4), stating that what is turned on the wheel is Āsuric and what is made without the wheel is godly (e.g., Kuzmina 1983, 21). According to Rau’s philological investigations, the characteristic of this oldest pottery was that it was made of clay mixed with various materials, some of them organic, resulting in porous pots. These pots were poorly-fired and ranged in size from about 0.24 m to 1.0 m in diameter at the opening and from 0.24 m to 0.40 m in height. Furthermore, they showed a lack of plastic decoration and were unpainted (Rau 1974, 142). Of further relevance is the fact that firing was accomplished by the covered baking method between two layers of raw bricks in a simple open pit. In later times this was done with materials producing red color. Rau advises excavators to be “on the lookout for ceramics of this description among their finds” (142).”
― Edwin F. Bryant, The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate

“Moreover, even if for argument’s sake it could be established that the percentage of foreign words in the Rgveda was considerably less than that of later texts, the explanation could well be a sociolinguistic (i.e., cultural) one. Many scholars such as Thieme have drawn attention to the linguistic puritanism of the Vedic texts. These are sacerdotal hymns describing ritualistic techniques that were preserved by a culturally distinct group of specialists who, like any elite, took pains to isolate their speech from common vulgarisms. The Epics and Puranas deal with the real world—tribes, geography, history, intrigue, war, and the religion of the people. Naturally, the vocabulary in these latter texts will be far less conservative and more representative of the language of the street, so to speak. One is not compelled to interpret any possible disparate proportion of non-Aryan words in different genres of texts as proof of a linguistic substratum.”
― Edwin F. Bryant, The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate

“In short, although the excesses of Aryan ideology in Europe would be hard to surpass, the Indians themselves were not averse to attempting to extract political mileage from the Aryan theme to support their own agendas. Indeed, in about 1920, one Visnu Sakharam Pandit filed an immigration court case in America, claiming to be a European. Since immigration was closed to Asiatics at that time, the ingenious fellow said he could prove that he was a Brahman and therefore a fellow Aryan. The argument was even entertained for a while, until a California court ruled that the Aryan invasion theory was precisely that: just a theory, and therefore not citable as credible proof for immigration purposes.”
― Edwin F. Bryant, The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate