Ridley’s Reviews > Phantom Waltz > Status Update

Ridley
Ridley is on page 32 of 418
Why are authors always so concerned about letting us know how the paraplegic character pees?
Nov 05, 2011 09:07PM
Phantom Waltz (Kendrick/Coulter/Harrigan, #2)

2 likes ·  flag

Ridley’s Previous Updates

Ridley
Ridley is on page 9 of 418
time away hasn't made this any less offensive. I'm highlighting whole pages.
Nov 05, 2011 08:25PM
Phantom Waltz (Kendrick/Coulter/Harrigan, #2)


Ridley
Ridley is on page 24 of 418
He's *carrying* her around? Is she freaking shitting me?
Jul 10, 2010 03:43PM
Phantom Waltz (Kendrick/Coulter/Harrigan, #2)


Ridley
Ridley is starting
I'm almost certain I'm not going to like it, but I own it, so I may as well give it a shot.
Jul 10, 2010 03:02PM
Phantom Waltz (Kendrick/Coulter/Harrigan, #2)


Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

I know I lie awake at night pondering that little mystery.


Ridley I get that I'm biased about these stories, being disabled myself, but I swear, even in the time when I wasn't disabled, I have never looked at anyone and thought, "I wonder how she takes a piss."


message 3: by NTE (new) - rated it 1 star

NTE Ridley wrote: "I get that I'm biased about these stories, being disabled myself, but I swear, even in the time when I wasn't disabled, I have never looked at anyone and thought, "I wonder how she takes a piss.""

THIS! I read this book at the suggestion of other people, because it had a heroine with a disability, and they thought it was "really well done". Um... NO.

While my disability is not paralyzing, I do use a chair, and I hope to god that while we are having a conversation, people aren't obsessing about how I pee. It's been a while, but I just remember there being a lot wrong with this one.


Ridley I'm reading this as "research" for a blog post/essay on physical disability in romance. It's slow going because the book is such an object lesson in Doing It Wrong that I'm highlighting or bookmarking something on every other page.

This book's problematic quotient is over 9000.


message 5: by new_user (last edited Nov 06, 2011 03:27PM) (new)

new_user LOL! Author assumes everyone's wondering, I guess. But no, I have not wondered that. Too much time...


message 6: by NTE (new) - rated it 1 star

NTE Ridley wrote: "I'm reading this as "research" for a blog post/essay on physical disability in romance. It's slow going because the book is such an object lesson in Doing It Wrong that I'm highlighting or bookmark..."

Well, it's definitely a good example of doing it wrong - I'd be really interested in reading that post: please link it when you finish!


back to top