Matthew Cannon’s Reviews > The Social Contract > Status Update

Matthew Cannon
is on page 65 of 164
Book III Chap 1 - confusing chapter on trying to explain difference between the body politic and its will in regard to exercise of power.
— Feb 24, 2015 04:27AM
Like flag
Matthew’s Previous Updates

Matthew Cannon
is on page 120 of 164
Book IV chap 4. Some of the chapters between the two entries I have made were confusing in body politic, general will, interested parties and self contradictory.
— Apr 08, 2015 12:11PM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 106 of 164
Book III chap 17. Found a few more quotes that were interesting. Now that he's moved into representation and authority it's making more sense.
— Apr 02, 2015 09:58AM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 100 of 164
Up to book III chapter 15. Multiple chapters on the rule of law in pursuant of the state and legislative body. Some interesting lines I've heard quoted elsewhere "every constitution has built in its own self destruction" is one.
— Mar 06, 2015 11:20PM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 84 of 164
chap 6 & 7. convoluted writing in explanation of monarchy and mixed government
— Mar 04, 2015 04:47AM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 76 of 164
Chapters on Democracy and Aristocracy. Finally made a few intriguing points but still seems just a tad off the mark. Still wondering where his philosophy lies in its basis and implementation
— Mar 03, 2015 05:55AM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 54 of 164
Chap 11. Still a hodge lodge of thoughts, but he finally said something I can actually agree with: Usurpers always bring about or select troublous times to get passed, under the cover of the public terror, destructive laws, which the people would never adopt in cold blood.
— Feb 18, 2015 12:27AM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 50 of 164
Chapter 10 now he's unto political power of the people and he's self contradictory again.
— Feb 10, 2015 03:58AM

Matthew Cannon
is on page 42 of 164
Chapter 7. Covered the will of the people, death penalty and the law. Writes in circular logic in detente to the "general will" and a corresponding sovereign. Both conflicting in power struggle as each seem to be natural extensions of the people but I don't think so as they have different ends.
— Feb 09, 2015 02:56AM