Scott Tsao’s Reviews > Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?: A Historical Introduction > Status Update
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
2) Thus, to the degree that the states made up the "nation" in the late 18th century, one could make a legitimate argument, based on the explicitly Christian statements in most state constitutions, that the people of the US did privilege Christianity over other religions. More states were clear about their desire to set up governments run by Christian and, in most cases, specifically Protestant Christians.
— Aug 23, 2013 10:21PM
Like flag
Scott’s Previous Updates
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
...In this sense, the US Constitution does not reflect the religious values, however we choose to define them, of the 18th century American people.
— Aug 23, 2013 10:22PM
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
In conclusion:
1) It is important to remember that the framers of the Constitution did not exclude God because they wanted to establish a completely secular society devoid of any religion. Rather, they realized that the role of religion and the government should be decided locally, among the individuals who made up the states.
— Aug 23, 2013 10:18PM
1) It is important to remember that the framers of the Constitution did not exclude God because they wanted to establish a completely secular society devoid of any religion. Rather, they realized that the role of religion and the government should be decided locally, among the individuals who made up the states.
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
- The First Amendment also forbids the national government from inhibiting the "free exercise" of religion. It protects individuals from government intrusion into their religious practices.
- The First Amendment was written to secure the individual rights to worship according to one's conscience. It was not meant as a means of protecting government from the religious beliefs of its citizens.
— Aug 23, 2013 10:14PM
- The First Amendment was written to secure the individual rights to worship according to one's conscience. It was not meant as a means of protecting government from the religious beliefs of its citizens.
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
- Most interpreters of the First Amendment agree that it forbids Congress from passing a law that privileges a particular religious group over any other.
- Unlike many of the British-American colonies and some of the states, the US government does not promote a specific religious group or use federal funds to support a particular sect.
— Aug 23, 2013 10:11PM
- Unlike many of the British-American colonies and some of the states, the US government does not promote a specific religious group or use federal funds to support a particular sect.
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
...The amendment was part of ten amendments, known today as the "Bill of Rights," passed by the first US Congress in 1789 and ratified, as per the Constitution, by 3/4 of the states.
- The First Amendment stated that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
— Aug 23, 2013 10:09PM
- The First Amendment stated that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
...or its failure to reference Almighty God, others opposed it for its failure to affirm liberty of conscience in matters of religion.
- Anti-Federalist demands for a formal statement defending the right to liberty of conscience in matters of religion came to fruition when the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution went into effect in 1791. …
— Aug 23, 2013 10:06PM
- Anti-Federalist demands for a formal statement defending the right to liberty of conscience in matters of religion came to fruition when the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution went into effect in 1791. …
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
... the Constitution does not mention God or delve deeper into church-state issues not because the framers were trying to create a secular nation, but because, as a point of federalism, they believed that religious matters should be left up to the states.
Religion and the First Amendment
- While some Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution for its failure to affirm a religious test for national office...
— Aug 23, 2013 09:58PM
Religion and the First Amendment
- While some Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution for its failure to affirm a religious test for national office...
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
- so-called "federalist argument"--the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution, "The powers not delegated to the US by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
- This amendment makes the Constitution a "federalist" document.
- Those who uphold a federalist view of the relationship between church and state argue convincingly that...
— Aug 23, 2013 09:54PM
- This amendment makes the Constitution a "federalist" document.
- Those who uphold a federalist view of the relationship between church and state argue convincingly that...
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
- While Anti-Federalist opposition was always more political than it was religious, many Anti-Federalists rejected the Constitution because it did not make any appeals to God.
- Anti-Federalists especially attacked Article VI because it placed no Christian qualifications on officeholders.
Religion and the States: The "Federalist" Interpretation of the Constitution
— Aug 23, 2013 09:49PM
- Anti-Federalists especially attacked Article VI because it placed no Christian qualifications on officeholders.
Religion and the States: The "Federalist" Interpretation of the Constitution
Scott Tsao
is on page 167 of 320
...ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public trust under the US." The framers of the Constitution made clear that a person could not be excluded from serving his or her country in the new national government based solely upon his or her religious convictions.
- This was not the case for the Anti-Federalists, however, who openly opposed ratification.
— Aug 23, 2013 09:45PM
- This was not the case for the Anti-Federalists, however, who openly opposed ratification.
