Randy’s Reviews > The Middle Game in Chess > Status Update

Neither EZB's nor Vukovic's analysis holds up. Engines find both new defensive resources and tactical shots. This may have been the first time when analyzing with an engine after looking at two different master commentary generated new (to me), understandable (to me) ideas.

Finally got to the Pillsbury-Tarrasch, Hasting 1895 game that Shereshevsky used so effectively in his "Soviet Chess Conveyor". Like other things Shereshevsky copied from this book, the original, (albeit a translation), is better and more complete.