Ceilidh > Status Update

Ceilidh
Ceilidh added a status update
So... this is a real thing:

http://stopthegrbullies.com/

The people who run this so-called anti bullying site are hypocrites, liars, slanderers and the very thing they claim to be fighting against. Shaming, defaming and bullying reviewers? Well done, you idiots.
Jul 09, 2012 03:26PM

161 likes ·  flag

Comments Showing 51-100 of 582 (582 new)


message 51: by Ceilidh (new)

Ceilidh Thanks dearie.

Tweet from @Bullying_Org:

Please know that we DO NOT endorse this site in ANY way. They put our banner on their site WITHOUT permission!


message 52: by Nasty Lady MJ (new)

Nasty Lady MJ Hmm, if the images are taken without permission maybe the blog could be shut down for copyright theft. Might be wise to send out multiple abuse reports.

The site in general is really disturbing. And the syntax seems strangely familiar to me-I have my suspicions...Also, is just me or are they trying to be all ironic with their contributors. I.E. the whole Peter Pan thing I think is a rift on Wendy but I might be reading waay too much into it.


message 53: by Brandi (new)

Brandi Lucy wrote: "Godaddy didn't listen to complaints when they did this to Wendy. It's unlikely to come down without a lawyer properly involved."

What happened with Wendy? How can they do this?


message 54: by Shannon (new)

Shannon YAL Book Briefs wrote: "The site in general is really disturbing. And the syntax seems strangely familiar to me-I have my suspicions...Also, is just me or are they trying to be all ironic with their contributors. I.E. the whole Peter Pan thing I think is a rift on Wendy but I might be reading waay too much into it. "

They apparently had a post about Wendy, but it was taken down. And yes, they have a Peter Pan theme, and yes, it's all familiar for a reason.


message 55: by Ceilidh (last edited Jul 09, 2012 04:48PM) (new)

Ceilidh Brandi wrote: "Lucy wrote: "Godaddy didn't listen to complaints when they did this to Wendy. It's unlikely to come down without a lawyer properly involved."

What happened with Wendy? How can they do this?"


Essentially Melissa Douthit, a vanity author who has a less than clean history in author-reviewer relations, dug up tons of info on Wendy and posted it in a blog post shaming her for her now infamous review of The Selection. That post is now password protected.


message 56: by Nasty Lady MJ (last edited Jul 09, 2012 04:46PM) (new)

Nasty Lady MJ Brandi wrote: "Lucy wrote: "Godaddy didn't listen to complaints when they did this to Wendy. It's unlikely to come down without a lawyer properly involved."

What happened with Wendy? How can they do this?"

Bradi, Melissa Douthit better known as Vanity posted a blog entry ranting about Wendy's review on The Selection and revealed private information about her. The site didn't take it down because Wendy wasn't a minor-at least that's the half ass reason I got when I got my reply from the abuse report.


message 57: by [deleted user] (new)

Brandi wrote: "Lucy wrote: "Godaddy didn't listen to complaints when they did this to Wendy. It's unlikely to come down without a lawyer properly involved."

What happened with Wendy? How can they do this?"


A month or so ago, Melissa Douthit posted quite a bit of Wendy Darling's personal information on her blog. :/


message 58: by [deleted user] (new)

YAL Book Briefs wrote: "Hmm, if the images are taken without permission maybe the blog could be shut down for copyright theft. Might be wise to send out multiple abuse reports.

The site in general is really disturbing..."


YES. The syntax, the lexis, it really is just Vanity. I bet those four 'contributors' are just different accounts she logs into to make it look like she has followers to this pathetic 'war effort'.


message 59: by Nasty Lady MJ (new)

Nasty Lady MJ Yep, pretty sure it's Vanity given the Peter Pan theme look at the comments from her supposed followers. Pretty soon I bet they'll be posting Nickelback songs.


message 60: by Brandi (new)

Brandi Oh wow, I stepped out of reading her Selection review after a while, and had no idea that happened!! This is seriously disturbing.


Alicia (is beyond tired of your *ish) This was Wordpress's response about the Wendy incident:

Hello,

Thank you for contacting us regarding your complaint. The information you have listed is not considered to be a violation of WordPress.com policy regarding the posting of personally-identifying information.

Posting of the following information is considered to be in violation of our policies:

* A Social Security, passport, or other national or state ID number
* Credit card numbers
* Full address or telephone information of minors

If any of the above content is present on the blog that is the subject of your complant, please contact us and indicate the exact URL where it appears and identify the content so we can properly investigate.

Thank you.
--
Terms of Service
WordPress.com



Cassi aka Snow White Haggard I just hope they give me a cool nickname if they post about me.


message 63: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley So, a couple of things:

(1) http://stopthegrbullies.com/2012/07/0... So, this: "This, in fact, was the reason she was blocked by Goodreads author, Lauren DeStefano – for harassment." Was this a public thing, or does that mean that Lauren D has to be involved in that blog? Because I really want a reason to read and be snarky about Sever.

(2) One thing you guys could do to try to get the info taken down is send a DMCA takedown notice to godaddy. There are instructions about it here: http://rising.blackstar.com/how-to-se...


message 64: by Brandi (new)

Brandi Cassi aka Snow White wrote: "I just hope they give me a cool nickname if they post about me."


You're on there screencapped.


message 65: by Vi (new)

Vi Vi This kind of shit can legitimately get someone killed. I hope they realize that.


message 66: by Ceilidh (new)

Ceilidh Sparrow wrote: "So, a couple of things:

(1) http://stopthegrbullies.com/2012/07/0... So, this: "This, in fact, was the reason she was blocked by Goodreads author, Lauren DeStefano – for harassment." Was this ..."


No professional author would be involved with this crap. This has vanity author written all over it.


Cassi aka Snow White Haggard I don't think Lauren D is involved in this blog. My memory is fuzzy but I think she was accidentally involved in a hashtag and then later apologized when she realized what the hashtag was referring to. I could've missed something but that's all I remember about her involvement in the dramas.


message 68: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley So, did Lauren post about blocking Lucy somewhere?


message 69: by Vi (new)

Vi Vi I'm voting Jamie M. has something to do with this tbh but that's just my random guess.


message 70: by [deleted user] (new)

Vi wrote: "I'm voting Jamie M. has something to do with this tbh but that's just my random guess."

As well as Vanity.

They could be like Voltron, forming together to forge this alliance.


Cassi aka Snow White Haggard Brandi wrote: "Cassi aka Snow White wrote: "I just hope they give me a cool nickname if they post about me."


You're on there screencapped."


I saw it. I just kind of LOLed at it. Can't let them bother me.


message 72: by Brandi (new)

Brandi I can't get over their recommendations list.


message 73: by Ceilidh (new)

Ceilidh Please be careful about the accusations you make without solid evidence.


Cassi aka Snow White Haggard Brandi wrote: "I can't get over their recommendations list."

You can guess some of the involved parties by it.


message 75: by [deleted user] (new)

Ceilidh wrote: "Please be careful about the accusations you make without solid evidence."

It's still speculation at this point, but that's what it seriously looks like. It could be a red herring, or it could just be a more open way of getting attention. *sigh*

And Cassi, you sure can!


message 76: by Shannon (last edited Jul 09, 2012 05:09PM) (new)

Shannon Ashleigh Paige wrote: "Since we're going to need it later and some of us may not want to give it more traffic, I've got the screencaps and I'll leave them here for future use."

I've been relegated to page 2! Page 2! Oh, the shame.

And here I thought I was front page news. -__-


message 77: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Lauren shouldn't be lumped in with any of this, she sent apologies to everyone involved. It wasn't a big deal, mostly a misunderstanding, and that's what happens when you stalk people and think you know what's going on.


message 78: by Steph (new)

Steph Sinclair Sparrow wrote: "So, did Lauren post about blocking Lucy somewhere?"

No, she did block Lucy, but later unblocked her. Lauren is not involved in that blog.


message 79: by [deleted user] (new)

Well, that is wonderful. I am so sorry for all of you who have to deal with this crap.
I see a load of authors with too much time. Why are they not, you know, writing?


message 80: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Ashleigh Paige wrote: "Look at it this way: they lovehate you so much that you had to be the very first."

Lol, I know. I'm first, bitches. (Well, technically Wendy was first ...)


message 81: by Nasty Lady MJ (new)

Nasty Lady MJ Vanessa yep, it could very well be a red hearing but if I had to make a guess I would say it's a big possibility or it's another vanity author or their minions.


message 82: by [deleted user] (new)

When they write about me, I'll make sure to tell all my friends that I made it big. WOOT, WOOT!

But seriously, sorry this happened to ALL of us. Hope we can get it taken down. It's disgusting and hypocritical.


message 83: by Alexandra (new)

Alexandra OH MY GOSH! This is unbelievable! Someone is a "bully" now if they don't like someone else's book? That is insane.


message 84: by Lucy (new)

Lucy The thing with Lauren involved the hashtag she didn't understand before joining in. I got annoyed because I specifically bought her book based on a pro-reviewer blog post she'd written a year earlier, so I dug it up and commented beneath the last comment (which was my own saying that I was going to buy her book because writers supporting reviewers was important to me.) She deleted my year old thank you comment and my newer 'so I guess this no longer stands comment' before blocking me...

I think she lifted the block when she started apologizing and clarifying her position. I don't even really blame her for deleting my newer comment because I think people saw it in my feed and started poking her, but I've left her blocked and never bothered reading her second book. I just didn't want to invest anything else in her, although I do believe her when she says she had no idea that the hashtag she participated in attacked a reviewer.

I also don't think she's involved in this site. I think Jamie McGuire and Jessica Park are too smart for this, but we all know Vanity has done something similar and done it very recently so that's who I suspect obviously. I think she'd get a very big thrill seeing herself listed with authors who sell books instead of drama.


message 85: by Lis (new)

Lis Oh, dear, this is absolutely revolting.


message 86: by Becki (last edited Jul 09, 2012 07:01PM) (new)

Becki WHAT THE HOLY FUCKING FUCKERTY is wrong with these people.

Hypocrites much.

First they accuse Kat of being a bad parent and an alcoholic. Yet it sounds like these people were drunk when they wrote these posts and showing their children the proper way to get what they want. oh yah your a hero alright 8Snorts* not.

Then they attack The Holy Terror for being a lay about with nothing else to do but stalk people. Ah hello you people seem to have a lot of time on your hands to be stalking everyone and putting thier personal info on the web. ( drips with heavy sarcasm) Keep up the good work you pillars of the community its totally working for you)

And then poor Lucy is being targeted as a follower and and accused of being above everybody else. And when did she write this somewhere. So now you people are imaging conversations yup someones not delusional. and they didn't have the decency to put her as defcon 1 now thats outrageous.

When oh when will people learn. (sighs) I weep for humanity.


message 87: by Lis (new)

Lis I bet what would really make them rage would be if we started a site called stophasslinggrreviewers.com or something.


message 88: by Ridley (new)

Ridley I'm going to choose to be flattered that I was so much bad ass that I warranted not just one, but two articles.


message 89: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Ridley wrote: "I'm going to choose to be flattered that I was so much bad ass that I warranted not just one, but two articles."

Seriously. And they didn't even pick a good one for me, they just piggybacked me onto your drama. Not fair.


message 90: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Skyla (Happy Go Lucky and Lost in Books) wrote: "Also why do I feel like one person is having a conversation with themselves on that site."

XD

For good reason.


message 91: by Becki (new)

Becki @ Skyla probably because it is all the blog posts are by Athena

Does anybody else see the irony in that.


message 92: by [deleted user] (new)

I don't mean to come across as a bleeding heart, but do you guys need to raise funds for a lawyer or anything...?


message 93: by Becki (last edited Jul 09, 2012 07:55PM) (new)

Becki Oh yes yes I just finished reading all the comments. And they do ugh yeesh. And to further back your claim up ever comment is from somone from peter pan What the hell is up with that. Is it because they can't seem to grow up and get over it.


message 94: by [deleted user] (new)

That blog makes me sad.

...That is all.


message 95: by Wendy Darling (new)

Wendy Darling Guys, I'm sorry this has happened to you. This is once again clearly disgruntled parties with an axe to grind, and I think even disinterested bystanders can see that there's obsessive, unbalanced behavior at work.

I think it's a good idea to look at this stuff through screencaps (thanks for that, Ashleigh Paige), as driving more traffic to that site is the last thing it should be rewarded with. And honestly, I know it's hard, but if you can manage it, THT's "I don't give a fuck" attitude is a good way to approach this. These types of personalities desperately crave attention, and they get off on the fact that people get worked up over it.

That doesn't mean that you shouldn't try to get it taken down, of course. Ceilidih posted the appropriate link in message #47 where you can contact GoDaddy, but fair warning that they were not responsive to the many reports that people filed on my behalf back in June, and frankly I'm so over all this drama that I haven't chosen to pursue it further. FYI that a friend of mine had someone look at the MD post who specializes in computer and internet law, and he pointed out that the alleged support she received for that rant on her little blog were all written by her. (He pointed out subtle similar word usage and grammatical errors, etc.) The mental issues with this type of behavior go beyond the legal stuff, so...take that into consideration if you decide to pursue any action.

I'm not around much right now (big surprise), but please do contact me if there's anything I can do to help.


message 96: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Lyn wrote: "I don't mean to come across as a bleeding heart, but do you guys need to raise funds for a lawyer or anything...?"

Lol, no ... the reason I live where I live and can be so fucking lazy is because I'm rolling in it!

: \

Plus, nothing she "dug" up was secret. Feel free to browse my photos and you'll see numerous friends calling me Shannon. And I talk about my husband sometimes. And it's always said where I live. Not exactly rocket surgery to find these facts.

Kat should be pissed though. And Lucy too. Lucy, a minion working at Home Depot in Atlanta? Can you even imagine? Insulting.


message 97: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Wendy Darling wrote: "FYI that a friend of mine had someone look at the MD post who specializes in computer and internet law, and he pointed out that the alleged support she received for that rant on her little blog were all written by her. (He pointed out subtle similar word usage and grammatical errors, etc.) The mental issues with this type of behavior go beyond the legal stuff, so...take that into consideration if you decide to pursue any action."

This translates to ... stay the fuck out of Utah. Seriously.


message 98: by Wendy Darling (new)

Wendy Darling P.S. And really, THT has frequents restaurants and has sex? SCANDALOUS.


message 99: by Scarlett (new)

Scarlett Plage I actually respect a lot of those people on the list who are considered "bullies". This site is terrible.


message 100: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Wendy Darling wrote: "P.S. And really, THT has frequents restaurants and has sex? SCANDALOUS."

HOW COULD YOU? I'm a married woman, I am not allowed to discuss sex, let alone the sex I'm reading about in awful books, and I'm ESPECIALLY not allowed to HAVE sex.

Did you notice the slut shaming they were going for? Since I discuss sex online that means I want other men to find me ... for sex? I don't even ... yeah. That one lost me.


back to top