Nosemonkey’s Reviews > Strategy: A History > Status Update
Nosemonkey
is on page 423 of 768
Still lots of focus on left-wing political movements, many of which seemed to have insufficient strategic thinking. Again, interesting - but feels quite a long-winded way of making a point, with lots of details which, while interesting, aren't strictly necessary.
Still good, though - it's just there's often many pages where the strategy elements aren't obvious.
— Oct 29, 2017 12:37PM
Still good, though - it's just there's often many pages where the strategy elements aren't obvious.
Like flag
Nosemonkey’s Previous Updates
Nosemonkey
is on page 542 of 768
This business strategy section is excellent. So far successfully dismissing almost all popular business strategy theories as at best flawed, but usually utter bullshit. Hurrah!
— Nov 12, 2017 03:09PM
Nosemonkey
is on page 505 of 768
On to the business strategy section, and so much makes sense now. So many idiot managers who've obviously read one or two management books and decided to follow just one theory, not realising that things have moved on. Because most management theory is, quite obviously I thought, utter bollocks. This makes clear how those theories developed, which makes them much more understandable. But still bollocks.
— Nov 11, 2017 01:32PM
Nosemonkey
is on page 334 of 768
Chapter 22, and it's getting more obviously strategic again - political strategy, the use of myth, propaganda, cultural shifts, the rise of party, the manipulation of crowds. Good stuff.
— Aug 15, 2017 02:45PM
Nosemonkey
is on page 289 of 768
All interesting and all, but I'm not sure why we're having this long diversion into the history of socialism/communism. I'm assuming all will be revealed...
— May 29, 2017 02:31PM
Nosemonkey
is on page 167 of 768
Cold War strategy section makes it even clearer that rational irrationality and mutually assured destruction are the way the Brexiters are approaching negotiations with the EU. FFS.
— Apr 30, 2017 03:33AM
