Josh’s Reviews > Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation > Status Update

I can't tell if he means a formal similarity or an organic identification of inscripturated word with incarnate word. The first could be reasonable, though a stretch; the second borders on absurd.

"christ-centered hermeneutics" and "christological hermeneutics" keeps getting bandied about, but i can't define them. he's failing to recognize the pre-reflective nature of hermeneutics that necessarily precedes a post-chalcedonian reading of the text; that is to say, simply recognizing that christ is/was the god-man in history does not in itself provide a hermeneutic—much less a compulsory one.