Kaz :)’s Reviews > Black on Both Sides: A Racial History of Trans Identity > Status Update
Kaz :)
is on page 139 of 256
Part 3! But also, oh we’re just not gonna talk about black women at all huh 🫠. No, that’s cool who gives a shit actually.
— Jul 09, 2026 05:08AM
Like flag
Kaz :)’s Previous Updates
Kaz :)
is on page 205 of 256
The pages after this are the Notes (sources) and the Index, I’m just not marking it as complete until I’m done formulating my thoughts on it.
— Jul 09, 2026 12:05PM
Kaz :)
is on page 176 of 256
Chapter 4’s the best one just because it talks about actual Black trans people and not the theoretical transness of all Black people by the way of being denied traditional (white) gender. Like I get it, I see it, I am acknowledging the fact and theory of it, but let’s talk about something real now.
— Jul 09, 2026 06:06AM
Kaz :)
is on page 135 of 256
“Black men are feminized by being born from a black women as laboring bodies” but also “Black sons can only become men when they untangle themselves from the burden of their mother” (the burden being. The Blackness). Idk it just rubs me the wrong way that this section didn’t go into the masculinization of black women while it went on about how black mothers are holding their sons back from manhood. :/
— Jul 09, 2026 05:05AM
Kaz :)
is on page 126 of 256
It would be more instructive [..] to read this instance of mammy-fication as the articulation of certain gendered dimensions of blackness in which the black "mother-like" is neither a black "woman" nor a black "man" but rather an emblem of a masochistic relation and a symbol of the processes by which black gender becomes fungible in slavery’s political and visual economy of indifference to black gender difference.
— Jul 08, 2026 10:23AM
Kaz :)
is on page 119 of 256
Oh goodie we’re talking about the black mammy now, are we still gonna be using Booker T Washington, W.E.B. DuBois and James Weldon Johnson as our framework?
— Jul 08, 2026 09:46AM
Kaz :)
is on page 119 of 256
“Just as […] were made to stand in for a black body politic, they also demonstrated how masculinism sometimes functioned as a mask for gender fungibility. Put differently, in the production of blackness as monolithic and of black people as interchangeable, gender difference continued to be lost.” (pg 119)
This argument would be better if the three referenced authors in this section so far weren’t all men.
— Jul 08, 2026 09:42AM
This argument would be better if the three referenced authors in this section so far weren’t all men.
Kaz :)
is on page 101 of 256
Semi-serious question, do I have to read the 60 pages of acknowledgments and notes (les sources) at the back?
Technically read yesterday.
— Jul 08, 2026 06:18AM
Technically read yesterday.

