Geoff > Status Update

Geoff
added a status update
Since it seems as likely as not that in a week DONALD FUCKING TRUMP is going to be declared commander-in-chief of the most powerful army humanity has ever known, I ask the good people of the world, what are you stocking your bomb shelters with? Also, half of America? Fuck you. I'm not one of you and I don't like you - stay away from me and my family you scary idiots.
— Nov 02, 2016 04:39AM
252 likes · Like flag
Comments Showing 3,051-3,100 of 4,673 (4673 new)

When Trump won I put my head in ..."
Safe travels. You'll be fine. If I survive Disneyland, Puerto Rico should be a cakewalk!
As far as reading: I've dedicated myself to reading the complete fictive works of Nabokov. Whatever gets us though the night.
Oh, the song is by Randy Newman.



And one hears (even on NPR of course) that Trump is not ideological. Ideological to the bone. He is nothing but driveling=sniveling ideology. He just doesn't believe in anything. Give me someone who believes in something any day of the week.

Muslims, for example. Give me Muslims.

Muslims, for example. Give me Muslims."
Exactly. Give me someone that has beliefs founded in reflection and contemplation. Trump is incapable of self-reflection.

Is Rump then a parody of 'blind religious faith'? Instead of blinding* following something, he's blindly following nothing.
* although I certainly quibble with the 'blindly'. Even the average religious fundamentalist repeatedly asks whether they are correctly following what they're supposed to be following ; whether they are true to it. They're usually wrong (about what they're trying to be true to), but they at least ask something of themselves, ask that they be true to something.

Is Rump then a parody of 'blind religious faith'? Instead ..."
I think you're onto something there

Careful what you wish for."
Care to explain? Is it a wrong thought to have preferred a Muslim President of the USofA over Rump?


It is rather depressing to consider that Trump is, at least as far as I can tell, an atheist. Okay... I've always wondered what an atheist POTUS would look like, and now we know. Come back monotheism, all is forgiven.


Just to stick with my claim, a left=leaning Muslim Democrat in the White House should be totally within the range of a sane political imagination.
But I'm not going down that route of the Two Evils. I think it's still possible to imagine a better world ; not this worse world.


No one expects The Spanish Inquisition?


Haha! VIOLENT INSURRECTION SUPERBOWL HALFTIME SHOW WITH LADY GAGA


Lol. Beards have been back in for awhile, Karl Marx Violent Insurrection Facial Hair Styling Products.

“No administration has accomplished more in the first 90 days.”
-President Donald J Trump"
You know, that may be true. For the first time I can remember, the American democratic system looks seriously vulnerable.


Yeah, as far as the downfall liberal democracy and a sane, civil society, he has indeed accomplished more in 90 days than any administration. Truth!

Well yeah except maybe Rutherford B Hayes - dude had a serious internet addiction - also, was into "furry porn" - truth.



Muslims, for example. Give me Muslims."
Exactly. Give me someone that has beliefs fou..."
I have certainly missed a lot here! But (maybe incorrectly) I have to disagree....I think Trump only reflects on himself! He is not concerned with anything or anyone BUT himself! Or what affects him. He certainly has no clue when it comes to what he is supposed to stand for.

“No administration has accomplished more in the first 90 days.”
-President Donald J Trump"
Um..."accomplished"?!?!?! I'm not sure destroying everything that was begun should be considered an "accomplisment"! At least not something to shouted from the rooftops!!

Alright guys,
This is where I lay my cards on the table and, I think, walk away from the game. I got 4 hours sleep last night because of this t..."
Hope you gave your daughter a memorable birthday at Disney! Never show fear to a child :)

We all had a delightful time. Thanks much. Only thing that proved negative is that all three of us are now racked with colds. Thank you again.

We all had a delightful time. Thanks much. Only thing that proved negative is that all three of us are now racked with colds. Thank you again."
Cody, a cold is a mere hinderance! Think yourself better! Positive vibes! Or you could come hang out with me....I rarely, if ever, get sick!
Feel better. :)


Globalism is mainly a good thing, and almost nobody seems to think so. Both right and left seem determined to ruin our economic prospects in an effort to improve our economic prospects.
Five years ago, the National Intelligence Council of the U.S. published their Global Trends forecast, looking forwards towards 2030. (I haven't yet read the new one that came out this year... I'm curious...) They included a discussion of what they called the "most plausible worst-case scenario," a retreat from globalism, which they referred to as "stalled engines." In their analysis, this means "...the risks of interstate conflict increase. The US draws inward and globalization stalls."
The report calls this "a bleak future."
"Drivers behind such an outcome would be a US and Europe that turn inward, no longer interested in sustaining their global leadership. Under this scenario, the euro zone unravels quickly, causing Europe to be mired in recession... global economic growth falters and all players do relatively poorly."
"The US political system fails to address its fiscal challenges and consequently economic policy and performance drift. The European project unravels... More nationalist, even nativist, parties rise to claim positions of influence in coalition governments. By the 2020s, it looks like only a limited free trade zone will remain. Economic growth continues in major emerging markets and accounts for approximately three quarters of global growth. Nonetheless, fundamental economic and political reforms remain elusive in China and India. Corruption, social unrest, weak financial systems, and chronically poor infrastructures slow their growth rates. China’s growth falls, for example, from 8 percent at the start of the period to around 3 percent by 2030. As pressures grow everywhere for disengagement and protectionism, the global governance system is unable to cope with a widespread pandemic that triggers panic. Rich countries wall themselves off from many developing and poor countries..."
"Slower global growth is accompanied by higher food prices."
"The US turns inward... and... is more interested in building a Fortress America."
Now, the above analysis, like several others in the report, puts more stress on pandemic outbreaks than I would have expected. I don't know what to say about that. I've also omitted one point which may not have been on target, but who knows... it referred to the potential failure of the U.S.A.s energy revolution, but I'd say that's very much up in the air right now. Whether global or isolated, the U.S. has potential for economic strength coming from either fossil fuels, OR innovative new energy tech, or so I think... ooops gotta run!

This piece by Susan Watkins was written a year ago, but still holds up remarkably well. The definitive assessment of left-wing opposition groups to have emerged in the west.
https://newleftreview.org/II/98/susan...
I don't think it's at all accurate to speak of a collapse of the left. The left had been dead for decades with neoliberalism & third way-ism. Rather, what we're seeing now is a modest resurgence.
Anyway, looks like Macron will probably get the chance to kick the can a little farther down the road. The existing order is widely despised, but the alternative is terrifying. France is not nearly as advanced in terms of social decay as the US. At least for the moment they seem much less likely to do anything as crazy/drastic as happened in this country.

Very interesting reading, although I don't think that the final statement that "the young are breaking left" is very accurate. Traditionally, young voters have ALWAYS leaned to the left. It is only now in recent years where young people have become open to right-wing populism as well. While it's true that "Supporters of Trump, UKIP and Le Pen tend to be middle-aged or over" they've also had an unprecedented amount of young voters. In France, Le Pen is mostly popular with young people.
http://www.france24.com/en/20170424-f...
There's also the fact that, while Millennials are generally very left leaning, the upcoming Generation Z is apparently "the most conservative generation since those born before 1945"
http://www.marcomm.news/gen-z-is-the-...
I doubt that the "modest revival" of left-wing populism stands a chance against the complete paradigm shift towards right-wing populism.


That article you linked also says Melenchon outperformed Le Pen among young voters. In the US opinion polls show people 30 and under have a more favorable opinion of socialism than capitalism.

Why do you think that people who support right-wing populists are just bad people?

Why do you think that ..."
Because I think their beliefs lead to a decrease of human rights and freedoms and generally obstruct the progress of the human experiment and lead to cultural/national antagonisms.

Until very recently, it was not considered at all controversial to describe the Front National as a fascist organization. I wouldn't say all its supporters are necessarily bad people, but the vision of a hypermilitarized police state to enforce national purity is not my cup of tea.
Plus their leadership strongly endorsed the election of Trump as a herald of their own movement. That's just dumb.
When Trump won I put my head in the book "Wilderness" by Lance Weller. You would like it. Then I went to "Blood Meridian," and now I am having a hard time concentrating with this Korean thing, so I read nature books and weed in my garden.