sosaspeaks’s Reviews > Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story" > Status Update

sosaspeaks
sosaspeaks is on page 149 of 192
Jung Chang accuses Mao of killing x = a x b x c number of people, where a = 'China's prison and labour camp population', b = 'annual death rate', and c = the years of his rule. She does not explain why a = 10 million.


Jung Chang does not show why Mao was responsible. Apparently she simply blames Mao for every Chinese death of whatever kind.
Aug 11, 2025 05:52PM
Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story"

flag

sosaspeaks’s Previous Updates

sosaspeaks
sosaspeaks is on page 165 of 192
Aug 11, 2025 08:14PM
Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story"


sosaspeaks
sosaspeaks is on page 111 of 192
Aug 11, 2025 05:33PM
Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story"


sosaspeaks
sosaspeaks is on page 44 of 192
Self-interests are indeed primary
for human beings, but it does not stop here. It is also our nature to extend this to helping others ... so working for the interests of others is in my own self-interest'.
Aug 09, 2025 08:18PM
Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story"


sosaspeaks
sosaspeaks is on page 11 of 192
The Great Leap Forward, on the other hand,
was designed to accelerate China's industrialization and farm production. Chang and Halliday show no understanding of the dilemma Chinese communists faced in the late 1950s, as a result of China's severe international isolation and the military blockade.
Aug 09, 2025 07:19PM
Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story"


No comments have been added yet.