Nozick grants the skeptic that the nature of the actual world is uncertain, then proceeds to define knowledge with reference to the actual world. Seems to me there are two ways to understand this apparent self-own. There's the silly way, which privileges hypotheses and makes it theoretically possible to 'know' that one is a brain in a vat. (Cont'd in comments.)
— Nov 30, 2021 01:13AM
4 comments
