Osame Osayande > Recent Status Updates

I have seen it before in women. Seen them drive from the room them coming with sympathy and pity, with actual help, and clinging to some trifling animal to whom they never were more than pack-horses. —

if he had said he knew with the words I would not have believed that he had been there and saw us. But he said he did know and I said “Are you going to tell pa are you going to kill him?” without the words I said it and he said “Why?” without the words. And that’s why I can talk to him with knowing with hating because he knows.

What could this possibly mean?

And so it was because I could not help it. It was then, and then I saw Darl and he knew. He said he knew without the words like he told me that ma is going to die without words, and I knew he knew because —

Being nearly four years old, she was certainly a child: and children are human (if one allows the term "human" a wide sense): but she had not altogether ceased to be a baby: and babies of course are not human-they are animals, and have a very ancient and ramified cul-ture, as cats have, and fishes, and even snakes:

in a real reading slump :/

That was a bad example, but I knew what she meant. It meant that to create was a fundament, to appreciate, a supplement. Once created, the creature was separate from the creator, and needed no seconding to fully exist.

Decent book and I like the way that the book explores solidarity between different groups, horizontal hostility and also the exploration of how/if members of oppressed groups in the their home country should help members of oppressed groups in the country that they are currently living in. But ultimately this book is a little too preachy for me, and kind of reads like a old television special “spreading awareness