Status Updates From Computer Power and Human Re...

Trudging through this 5 pages at a time

This book seems like it will be very interesting, and important in the current zeitgeist, especially to compare the predictions from 50 years ago. However, I think the author creates an intellectually dishonest position when he dismisses key axioms of the scientific method (measurability = reality, repeatability = truth). How can you effectively disagree with a position when you can't agree on a definition for truth.