Status Updates From El existencialismo es un hu...

I agree with him, afterall, unlike Kafka with his narratives full of signs that seem meaningful but hard to fully understand, Camus finds tragey in the lack of any transcendence. In Camus' world, meaning isn't hidden but simply doesn't exist.

In "A Commentary on The Stranger," he talked about how Camus creates the feeling of absurd and for him, isn't just an idea, but a condition of human life where a gap between our desire for order and meaning of the messy world we live in. He also separates The Myth of Sisyphus from The Stranger, even tho Camus is often compared to writers like Kafka, Sartre argues that Camus is quite different.

Sartre admitted that freedom exists only within a situations, you ain't free to fly by flapping your arm but free to invent the airplane, the problem still remains, systemic slavery, and his answer not satisfied me, he said the individual is free only to extent that they can revolt against the situation, but we ain't we should change that situation so freedom becomes a livid reality? not just a mental state.

op een dag lees je over homo vampieren, de volgende sartre. balans.

WHAT IS GOING ON!!???

I find myself siding with Naville over Sartre since my earlier doubts about the slavery concept align perfectly with his points. Naville argues that true freedom isn't just an internal choice but there's a victory won through political struggle and material world, he forces us to look at the physical needs and social structure that Sartre overlooked(?). It's telling that Sartre took these critiques seriously.