Status Updates From The Middle East: A Brief Hi...
The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 1,722
Brendan
is on page 184 of 448
“Many stories are told in the Arabic chronicles of how, when the Arabs came as conquerors, they tried to take over the government but couldn’t, because nobody could read the accounts except the accountants, and no one could deal with correspondence except the clerks in the office. And so, the stories relate, perforce the Arabs had to give way, and though they were the unchallenged political and military masters
— Apr 13, 2026 08:19PM
3 comments
Brendan
is on page 139 of 448
“The titulature of sovereignty in Islam, unlike that of Christendom, does not normally make use of territorial or ethnic designations. There are no equivalents to the kings of England, of France, of Spain, or other realms in the West. During the great wars between the sultan of Turkey and the shah of Iran in the 16th century, these were titles which each applied to the other to belittle him, and never to himself.
— Apr 11, 2026 01:28PM
1 comment
Brendan
is on page 114 of 448
“The resulting struggle [between the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Iranians] was for both the leadership of Islam and the control of the Middle East. It was waged not only on the battlefield but also in a war of propaganda between the Sunni and Shi’a faiths of which the Ottoman sultan and the Safavid shah were respectively the champions. The struggle ended with a limited victory for the Ottomans, who were able
— Apr 08, 2026 09:07PM
2 comments
Brendan
is on page 67 of 448
“Wherever Shi’ites are to be found, on [the date of the Battle of Karbala] they commemorate the martyrdom of the Prophet’s family, the penitence of those who failed to save them, and the wickedness of [the Umayyad soldiers] who killed them, in religious rituals inspired by the potent themes of sacrifice, guilt, and expiation. The doctrinal differences between Sunni and Shi’a Muslims are of minor importance,
— Apr 06, 2026 09:56PM
2 comments
Brendan
is on page 38 of 448
On the Roman/Persian rivalry that preceded (and enabled) Islamic conquest of the Middle East:
“The Roman, and then Byzantine interest, was to establish and preserve external trade links with China and India, thus bypassing the Persian-dominated center. The Persian Empire tried to use its position athwart the transit routes to control Byzantine trade, so as to exploit it in times of peace or stop it in times of war.
— Apr 06, 2026 04:10PM
1 comment
“The Roman, and then Byzantine interest, was to establish and preserve external trade links with China and India, thus bypassing the Persian-dominated center. The Persian Empire tried to use its position athwart the transit routes to control Byzantine trade, so as to exploit it in times of peace or stop it in times of war.










